Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document B: Declaration of
Independence, 1776
1. Life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness.
41
Document D: James Madison, On protector of people’s rights against
Property, 1792 the action of the states. The federal
1. government gained power while the
everything to which a man may states lost it.
attach a value and have a right: land,
merchandise, or money, as well as Document F: Slaughterhouse Cases,
opinions and the free communication 1873
of them, religious opinions, safety 1.
and liberty, free use of his faculties. immunities narrowly, as rights which
According to Madison, property is an owe their existence to the national
inalienable right: “…(A)s a man is said government, as opposed to the state
to have a right to his property, he may governments.
be equally said to have a property in
his rights.” Examples are: The right to come to
2. the seat of government to assert a
claim upon it, or to transact business
2. Yes. This amendment changed the teacher’s right to teach, the parents’
relationship between the national right to hire him to do so, and the
government and individuals by authority of parents to direct the
education of their children.
42
2. The government could not abridge 2. Two rights not included in “the
the rights of individuals; the ends concept of ordered liberty” include
did not justify the means. “Certain the right to trial by jury and immunity
fundamental rights must be from prosecution except as the result
respected…a desirable end cannot be of an indictment.
promoted by prohibited means.”
3. Accept reasoned responses.
1. The power of the national government 1. The Court will presume that laws are
is not made greater by crisis “powers constitutional. The Court should trust
of the national government are
limited by the constitutional grants.” the legislators in laws that regulate
“Extraordinary conditions do not
create or enlarge constitutional only whether the law is rationally
power.” related to a legitimate state interest.
The rational basis test is a very
2. The ruling asserts that the Founders low standard and results in most
“anticipated and precluded” the laws that are subjected to it being
argument that times of crisis would interpreted as constitutional.
justify enlarging the power of the
federal government, and acted 2. Footnote 4 lists circumstances in
which the Court might NOT assume
adding the Tenth Amendment to the the constitutionality of a law: when
Constitution. legislation appears on its face to be a
violation of a protection listed in the
Bill of Rights, or is directed against
Document J: Palko v. Connecticut, 1937 particular religious, or national, or
1. racial minorities, or against discrete
including rights to speech, press,
religion, peaceable assembly, normal protections of the political
process. In these instances, the
crime, or those rights “implicit in the Court should apply a stricter standard
(“strict scrutiny”) in determining
fundamental.” constitutionality, and will be less
43
(Fewer laws survive strict scrutiny 2.
1. As encompassing “intimate 4.
relations,” which are protected by
virtue of emanations and penumbras Convention, 1936
of other constitutional protections.
5.
2.
the pattern set by Footnote 4 in the
6. The
Carolene Products decision, applying
Farmer Refuted, 1775
only the rational basis test to laws
touching on these areas. 7. Progressive - Williams Jennings
3. Related, implied rights help support
Democratic National Convention,
stated rights.
1896
4. Accept reasoned responses.
8. Founder - Thomas Jefferson,
Resolutions Relative to the Alien and
Document N: Lawrence v. Texas, 2002
1. 9. The
from “unwarranted government National Gazette, 1792
intrusions into a dwelling or other
private places.” Even outside the 10. Progressive - Woodrow Wilson,
home, we should have an expectation Socialism and Democracy, 1887
“of an autonomy of self that
11.
includes freedom of thought, belief,
Letter on the Passage of the 18th
expression, and certain intimate
conduct.”
1928
2.
12. Why
economic rights.
Prohibition!, 1918
QUOTE MATCH:
44
public reporting requirements Amendment],” or that “spending [on
and dollar-amount limitations on an abortion] amounted to [an abortion]
contributions (FECA, 1971 & 1974), protected by the [Due Process Clause of
and a ban on “electioneering the Fourteenth Amendment].” Rather,
communications” within a set time the reasoning would be that banning
period prior to elections (BCRA, 2002). such spending unconstitutionally
interfered with the rights to assistance
2. The Court deemed that restricting
of counsel, private education, or an
independent spending by individuals
and groups to support or defeat a
on candidates from traveling in order
candidate interfered with speech
protected by the First Amendment, so
be unconstitutional because the ban
long as those funds were independent
on travel unconstitutionally burdened
of a candidate or his/her campaign.
45
4. Those with power will “become 4.
wolves,” which is to say they will may note that in the cartoon’s time
oppress those without power.
state legislatures.
Document C: The First Amendment,
1791 Document E: New Nationalism Speech,
1. Accept reasoned answers. Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
1.
2.
“control and corrupt the men and
persuasively to friends or larger
methods of government for their own
writing for a newspaper or other
2. Roosevelt’s description of “special
interests” seems very similar to
media, writing letters to the editor, Madison’s concept of “faction.”
attending political rallies, meeting in
clubs or other groups. Document F: Buckley v. Valeo, 1976
1.
Document D: “The Bosses of the the same First Amendment
Senate,” Joseph Keppler, 1889
1. “Quid pro quo” refers to a more speech. Civil discourse on politics
or less equal exchange. In the is essential for self government.
context of political discourse, the Engaging in speech requires
term often suggests bribery. “Quid spending money. Therefore, limits on
pro quo” refers to an expectation spending by individuals and groups
that, if wealthy contributors donate unconstitutionally burden their ability
large sums of money to a political
campaign, the person receiving this
against a candidate, and was meant
to ensure such speech could occur in
a variety of ways.
2. The cartoonist believes that, through
Document G: Citizens United Mission
the business interests of the Statement, 1988
industrial age have seized control of 1. Probably not. While Citizens United
is “a number of citizens…united and
actuated by some common…interest,”
pro quo corruption is indicated by its expressive activities do not satisfy
the position and size, relative to the
faction: “adversed to the rights of
business interests. other citizens, or to the permanent
and aggregate interests of the
3. The closed door leading to the public
community.”
the author’s message that the 2. Accept reasoned answers.
government is no longer open to “the
people.”
46
Document H: McConnell v. F.E.C., 2003 Document K: Concurring Opinion,
1. Citizens United v. F.E.C., 2010
to engage in political speech, 1. This concurring justice argues that
corporations and unions are not corporations existed at the time of
the Founding. They not only engaged
merely must do so through their in speech and petitioned the
PACs. government, but were understood by
the authors of the First Amendment
2. Accept reasoned answers.
to have speech rights equivalent to
individual Americans. Further, the
Document I: Citizens United v. F.E.C., First Amendment does not allow
2010 restrictions to be made on the basis
1. The First Amendment protects
citizens, or associations of citizens,
from being punished for engaging in Document L: “Another Dam Breaks,”
political speech. Matt Wuerker, 2010
2. Accept reasoned answers. 1.
Court’s ruling in Citizens United
3. Accept reasoned answers.
union and corporate money from
Document J: Dissenting Opinion, overwhelming American voters with
Citizens United v. F.E.C., 2010 political speech. The resulting wave
1. The dissent argues that the right to of “special interest” money threatens
free speech was designed to protect
individual voting Americans.
was never understood to apply to 2. Accept reasoned answers.
corporations, which are business
associations, not political ones. The
notion of “corporate speech” was
foreign to the Founders, and the First
Amendment doesn’t protect it at the
same level. Congress has a legitimate
interest in protecting against “undue
47