Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AGENDA
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES - 360O VIEW
Consumer
Advertisers
Industry
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
1
WHAT IS FAKE NEWS?
yellow journalism or propaganda….
…. a type of
…written and published with the intent to mislead in order to gain financially or politically, often with
sensationalist, exaggerated, or patently false headlines that grab attention
2
Fake News is not a new ideaTHE GREAT MOON HOAX
How do
consumers
define fake
news?
“News with
misleading
headlines”
“Stories that
purposely spread
misinformation”
3
1. The rise of social media and global
KEY connections result in spreading of
THEMES fake news
4
Consumer
360 O Perceptions
Industry
5
CONSUMER IMPACT
6
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
CONSUMER IMPACT
7
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
27%
12%
10% 10%
8% 8%
6% 6% 6%
4% 3%
Social media Mainstream TV Conservative Politicians Satire news (e.g. Liberal media Mainstream print Internet news Lifestyle websites Late night talk None of the
(e.g. Facebook, news (e.g. media (e.g. The Onion, The (e.g. the Atlantic, news (e.g. New aggregator (e.g. (e.g. Refinery29, shows (e.g. The above
Twitter) MSNBC, CNN, Breitbart) Daily Show) HuffPost) York Times, Wall Google, Yahoo) BuzzFeed, Tonight Show,
Fox) Street Journal) PopSugar) Bill Maher)
Millennials 36%
I only read
trust news news from
sites/sources
less than I trust
74%
Hateful/ Fake News state that credible, brand-
safe environments are
Offensive/ worth paying a premium
for.
Derogatory
content
76%
Source: OMG, National Online Survey June 2017l; Top 2 box agreement 10
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
12
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
INDUSTRY IMPACT
Gaining control
over digital
budgets is
driving
advertisers to
think
differently…..and
more cautiously
INDUSTRY IMPACT
% Spending of Respondents
Spendin Spending
g more less 14% No, this was
33% Yes, this not part of the
was one of decision
many 35%
Spending about the same reasons 48%
Yes, this
53% was the
primary
reason 17%
Source: Brightroll (4/2017) 16
INDUSTRY TOOLS
17
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
But is it working?
“They’re talking to us, but there hasn’t been a lot of action yet.” (News
Media Alliance)
19
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
20%
of media decision makers
rely on “internal monitoring/management”
20
Four Challenges
to Overcome for
a Comprehensive
Brand Safety
Solution
Challenge #1 Challenge #2 Challenge #3 Challenge #4
“Brand safety” A blacklist needs help Fake news Transparency in
can be highly for strategic brand requires human brand safety
subjective safety identification performance
21
Rely on
experts to
identify fake
news
Open Brand Safety (OBS)
Framework
22
Open Brand Safety (OBS)
A measurement and analytics
Challenge #3: company improving brand
advertising online
Cut off funding to
fake news and A service for journalists that
extremist content identifies videos likely to go viral
and verifies their authenticity
using tech +
human review Top journalism institutions, fact
checkers, and think tanks on the
forefront of fake news identification
23
If brand safety relies on accurate content classification
and whether domains are classified as fake news, you
Prioritize need a way to monitor activity on those fronts
brand safety
measurement Potentially False Information
Moat’s new
metric:
Potentially
False
Information
24
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
25
Importance of
Fake news isn’t
credible context
new
for advertisers
NEED FOR
BALANCE
26
Fake News, Real Consequences: Impact on Consumers, Publishers and Advertisers – PDRF 2017 Madrid
What does this all mean and how can we continue to fight for the integrity
of our content and advertising environments?
THOUGHTS