Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advanced Demand
Waterfall® Use Cases
14 May 2015
Today’s Session: Flexing Your Waterfall Muscles
• Key issues
• Too few organizations have utilized the Demand Waterfall® beyond functional
alignment, process definition and basic measurement
• Advanced Demand Waterfall applications require the addition of new data
elements, collection strategies and analysis methodologies
• Aggregate Demand Waterfall reporting masks insights and diagnostics that can be
applied to optimize and improve marketing and sales programs
• What you will walk away with
• An understanding of the value of advanced use cases for both marketing and sales
• Insight into data collection and analysis methodologies needed for these use cases
• Strategies to diagnose investments in marketing and sales programs
Inquiry
Inbound Outbound
Performance Measurement
Marketing Qualification
Sales Qualification
Close
Won Business
Demand Planning
Inquiry
Inbound Outbound
Sales Qualification
Close
Context Filters Demand Planning
Won Business
Data filters
Filters
provide
Aggregate context
Campaign Creation
Date
Revenue
Define
Requirement
Waterfalls
Step 2
Waterfall
measurement starts
Step 3 with defining the
right context for
Step 4 analysis; multiple
Waterfall views may
be necessary
Step 5 US and CAN Nordics China
• TBD
Revenue
Define
Requirement
Waterfalls
Isolate
Cohorts Campaign Campaign
#1 #2
Out of
Campaign
Campaign Campaign
#1 #2
Out of
Campaign With Waterfalls
defined, isolate
Step 3 Volume
(1000s) 24.9 19.1 8.8 1.4
3.2 1.1
2.8 0.7
3.1 cohorts by lead
Throughput origination filters
1.1% 3.7% 1.9% 3.6%
1.3% 3.1%
1.4% 2.6%
2.2%
Step 4
(INQ – C/W)
and analyze for
Velocity
64 61 69 76
88 79
85 84
90
volume, conversion
(# Days)
and velocity
CPL
Step 5 (USD)
$880 $914 $715 $1,080
$830 $990
$745 $685
$590
Revenue
Define Campaign Campaign Non-
Requirement
Waterfalls #1 #2 Campaign
Build management
Dashboards 65.5% 15 90.0% 15 90.0% 20 dashboards, giving
visibility into both
979 2,355 594
SQL
Step 4 program
28.0% 40 30.0% 41 28.0% 42 performance and
274 707 166 Deals Won effectiveness of lead
WON
Step 5 management
$30.1M 64 $69.9M 61 $14.1M 69 Value Cycle
processes
© 2015 SiriusDecisions. All Rights Reserved 17
Advanced Performance Measurement Examples
SiriusPerspective: Waterfall measurements must be disaggregated to conduct
meaningful analysis of the programs and processes contributing to current performance.
Revenue
Define
Requirement
Waterfalls |-----------------SLAs IN COMPLIANCE---------------|
Revenue
Define
Requirement
Waterfalls
Inquiry
Isolate
Inbound Outbound
Reinforce functional
Marketing Qualification
Cohorts
Automation Qualified Leads (AQLs)
Teleprospecting
Qualified Leads (TQLs)
Teleprospecting Generated
Leads (TGLs) daily management
Build Sales Qualification
Close
management council
Convene
Won Business
that meets
Council periodically to
review and optimize
Step 5 programs and
processes
© 2015 SiriusDecisions. All Rights Reserved 19
Advanced Performance Measurement Examples
SiriusPerspective: Waterfall measurements must be disaggregated to conduct
meaningful analysis of the programs and processes contributing to current performance.
Revenue
Define
Requirement
Waterfalls 1 Make Observations (Pattern Analysis)
Isolate
Cohorts 2 Ask Why Ongoing
optimization
Build
Dashboards 3 Form Hypotheses requires a diagnostic
approach to
Convene identifying and
4 Test Hypotheses address
Council
underperforming
Diagnose 5 Analyze Findings and Act programs and
Problems processes
Revenue
Identify 0.38% B 0.65%
Requirement
Patterns Acme Peers
Total Waterfall Efficiency
(INQ – Won)
Step 2
5.7% B 10.7% 6.8% A 6.1%
Step 3 Marketing Function
(INQ – TQL)
Sales Function
(TQL – Won)
The ABAA pattern
identifies a likely
break point in the
Step 4 AQL-to-TQL
57.0% A 54.0% 9.9% B 19.8% 31.0% A 29.1% 22.0% A 21.0%
conversion process
Automation
Qualification Tele Qualification Sales Qualification Sales Close
Step 5 (INQ – AQL) (AQL – TQL) (TQL – SQL) (SQL – Won)
Revenue
Identify AQLs do not meet tele’s profile fit
expectations
Requirement
Patterns Input (AQL)
AQLs sent to tele prematurely
Evaluate
Hypotheses Broken service-level agreements
Telequalification skills/enablement
Step 3 AQL TQL In-Process
gaps The hypothesis map
Messaging delivered by tele is not
for the ABAA pattern
xBxx resonating identifies possible
Step 4 Solution not addressing market reasons for under-
needs
performance
Revenue
Identify Are broken service-level agreements with teleservices an issue
for our organization?
Requirement
Patterns 1 2 3 4 5
Evaluate
Definitely Probably Possibly Not Likely No
Hypotheses
Define
acceptance, engagement or
Clear rules for acceptance,
engagement or lead timeouts
performance to
lead timeouts
best practices
Enforce
Revenue
Identify Teleprospecting Key Metrics
Requirement
Patterns Activity
Unworked Lead % 27%
Evaluate
Hypotheses Initial-Touch Timing Compliance 57%
Revenue
Identify
Requirement
Patterns
Form SLA Governance Teleservices
Hypotheses
Assess • Notifications • Call Scoring
Processes • Escalation • Sales Alignment
Prove • Yield Analysis • Culture
Hypotheses
Take
Action
© 2015 SiriusDecisions. All Rights Reserved 27
Revenue Forecasting: Three Key Questions
SiriusPerspective: Understanding the expected future revenue value of your current
Demand Waterfall provides opportunities to prevent revenue shortfalls.
Revenue
Analyze Current Waterfall Stage Volume
Requirement
Volume Current
Volume
Step 2
INQ 6,215
AQL 171
Step 3 TAL 569
Validate that current
stage volume
TQL 34
reflects active
Step 4 SAL 54 engagement and
SQL 3,568 buying cycles
Step 5
Revenue
Analyze Current Waterfall Stage Volume
Requirement
Volume Current Current Net Estimated Estimated
Volume Conversion Conversion Close/Won Revenue
Forecast to C/W
Value INQ 6,215 54% 0.30% 19 $2,595,293
Revenue
Analyze Expected Timing of Waterfall Revenue
Requirement
Volume Avg. Days at Avg. Days to Quarter Estimated
Stage Close Impact Revenue
Forecast
Value INQ 40 221 3 $2,595,293
Revenue
Analyze Quarterly Expected Revenue Against Goals
Requirement
Volume $3,000,000
Forecast $2,500,000
Value $2,000,000
In this scenario, we
Revenue
Revenue
Analyze
Requirement
Volume
Service-Level
Forecast Acceleration Management
Value
• Passive Recycle • Sales Handoff
Forecast Nurtures • Compliance
Timing
• Pipeline • Culture
Identify Acceleration
Gaps • Economic Value
Tools
Adjust
Plan
© 2015 SiriusDecisions. All Rights Reserved 34
Demand Planning: Three Key Questions
SiriusPerspective: Demand planning provides critical insight into both the Waterfall
efficiency and volumes required to meet future revenue goals.
Revenue
Set Demand Planning for FY2016
Requirement
Goal Revenue
Revenue
Set Waterfall Analysis
Requirement
Goal Revenue Goal $7,000,000 Deal Size $40,000
Reverse
Conversion Conversion Required
Waterfall Point Rate
Stage
Waterfall
INQ to AQL 54% INQ 16,763
Leveraging
Step 3 AQL to TAL 83% AQL 9,052 current Waterfall
TAL to TQL 12% TAL 7,513 conversions, 16,763
inquiries are
Step 4 TQL to SAL 79% TQL 902
required to reach
SAL to SQL 39% SAL 71,216
the revenue goal
Step 5 SQL to C/W 18% SQL 278
Plan C/W 50
Revenue
Set Budget Analysis
Requirement
Goal Current Plan
Blended Cost per Inquiry $60
Reverse Inquiries Required 16,763
Waterfall
Budget Allocation
Align The available budget
Acquisition $1,005,782
Campaigns will not fund the
Nurture inquiry volume
Enablement required at current
Step 4
Total Budget $1,005,782 conversion rates and
Available Total Budget $840,000 execution plan
Step 5 Budget Gap ($165,782)
Revenue
Set Waterfall Scenario Analysis
Requirement
Goal Revenue Goal $7,000,000 Deal Size $40,000
Revenue
Set Budget Analysis
Requirement
Goal Current Plan Improved Plan
Blended Cost per Inquiry $60 $60
Reverse Inquiries Required 16,763 10,934
Waterfall
Budget Allocation Changing
Align
Acquisition $1,005,782 $656,036 investments to mid-
Campaigns stage and late-
Nurture $100,000
Evaluate Waterfall programs
Enablement $75,000
enables us to meet
Scenarios Total Budget $1,005,782 $831,036
revenue goals with
Finalize Available Total Budget $840,000 $840,000 existing budgets
Plan Budget Gap ($165,782) $8,964
• Which Waterfall use case do you think will add the most value for
your organization moving forward?
• Performance management
• Waterfall diagnostics
• Revenue forecasting
• Demand planning