Professional Documents
Culture Documents
39
39
C h a p t e r
MONITORING JOBS
5 AND INFLATION**
Lecture Notes
Monitoring Jobs and Inflation
The unemployment rate, the employment-to-population ratio, and the labor force
participation rate are key labor market indicators.
The natural unemployment rate is the unemployment rate at full employment; it
is comprised of frictional and structural unemployment.
The unemployment rate fluctuates over the business cycle.
The price level and the inflation rate are measured using the CPI as well as other
price indexes.
I. Employment and Unemployment
Current Population Survey
The U.S. Census Bureau measures the population, labor force, and amount of
employment. The working-age population is the total number of people aged
16 years and over who are not in jail, a hospital, or some other form of
institutional care. The labor force is the sum of the employed and the
unemployed.
Unemployment occurs when someone who wants a job cannot find one. To be
counted as unemployed, a person must be available for work and must be in one
of three categories:
Without work but has made specific efforts to find a job within the previous
four weeks
Waiting to be called back to a job from which he or she has been laid off
Waiting to start a new job within 30 days
Ask the students, “If I was to assign a homework assignment of estimating the
unemployment rate in your city, how would you do it?” You will probably get an answer
of “Google it,” but tell them that this is not an Internet mining project! Try to have some
of your students suggest an in-person survey or a phone survey. Now you can walk
through some of the issues economists face with data collection (questions to ask,
sample size, bias, etc.). Discuss how a grocery store may be a decent place to get a
random sample of people from all demographics and how a phone survey might miss
some poor, unemployed person without a phone or students who do not have a land-
based phone.
Marginally attached workers are people who are available and willing to work
but currently are neither working nor looking for work. These workers often
temporarily leave the labor force during a recession and decrease the labor force
participation rate. Because they are no longer counted as unemployed,
marginally attached workers lower the unemployment rate. A discouraged
worker is a marginally attached worker who has stopped looking for work
because of repeated failures to find a job.
Economic part-time workers are people who are working part-time but would like
to find full time work. These workers are not unemployed by the U-3 standard
but are considered “part-unemployed.”
Marginally attached workers (and discouraged workers) as well as economic part-
time workers who want a full-time job are not counted as unemployed in the
official unemployment rate.
Real World Examples from the Class: Ask the class if anyone has an example of a
‘discouraged worker’ or someone who has taken a part-time job even though he or she
wants a full-time job. It would be unusual if no one had a story to tell.
A really big difference is made by adding the economic part-time workers (U–
6). In June 2017, adding these workers to the U-5 unemployed increased the
underemployed rate to 8.5 percent.
II. Unemployment and Full Employment
Types of Unemployment
Frictional unemployment is the unemployment that arises from normal labor
turnover. These workers are searching for jobs. The unemployment related to
this search process is a permanent phenomenon in a dynamic, growing
economy. Frictional unemployment increases when more people enter the labor
market or when unemployment compensation payments increase.
Structural unemployment is the unemployment that arises when changes in
technology or international competition change the skills needed to perform jobs
or change the locations of jobs. Sometimes there is a mismatch between skills
demanded by firms and skills provided by workers, especially when there are
great technological changes in an industry. Structural unemployment generally
lasts longer than frictional unemployment. Minimum wages and efficiency wages
create structural unemployment.
Cyclical unemployment is the fluctuating unemployment over the business
cycle. Cyclical unemployment increases during a recession and decreases during
an expansion.
Identifying frictional, structural, and cyclical unemployment. Ask your class if
anyone they know has been laid off. Then discuss whether losing a job creates
frictional, structural, or cyclical unemployment. Look at your local examples. If you live
in a steel-producing or car manufacturing area, for example, you can talk about local
structural unemployment arising from the closing of factories due to international
competition. For cyclical unemployment, ask students how they think the business
cycle and cyclical unemployment is related to full-time enrollments at higher education
institutions. Students often don’t think there is any relationship. But nationally during a
recession, the growth rate of full-time enrollments increases. Ask students if they can
explain this relationship. The answer is that during a recession and due to the increase
in cyclical unemployment, the opportunity cost of school decreases. This is a great way
to keep students thinking about marginal benefits and costs.
Work through each type of employment asking whether it is good or bad for society
(call to their attention that it is usually bad for the individual, but may be good long
term for society)
Frictional? Good because a healthy, dynamic, economy needs new
entrants to the labor force , such ascollege graduates, and freedom for
people to quit a job they don’t like.
Structural? Good because a healthy, growing economy has technological
change that makes some jobs obsolete.
Cyclical? Bad because it is unfortunate to have unemployment strictly
because of the cyclical nature of the economy. If it were possible to
maintain the same level of economic growth with less fluctuation, we
would have less cyclical unemployment with a higher level of welfare. Can
and should the cycle be managed? This is a big question in
Macroeconomics that we will continue to tackle!
“Natural” Unemployment
Natural unemployment is the unemployment that arises from frictions and
structural change when there is no cyclical unemployment—when all the
unemployment is frictional and structural. Natural unemployment as a
percentage of the labor force is called the natural unemployment rate.
Full employment is defined as a situation in which the unemployment rate
equals the natural unemployment rate.
What Determines the Natural Unemployment Rate?
The Age Distribution of the Population An economy with a young population has
a large number of new job seekers every year and has a high level of frictional
unemployment.
The Scale of Structural Change The scale of structural change is sometimes
small but sometimes there is a technological upheaval. When the pace and
volume of technological change and when the change driven by international
competition increase, natural unemployment rises.
The Real Wage Rate The natural unemployment rate increases if minimum wage
is raised to exceed the equilibrium wage rate or if more firms use an efficiency
wage (a wage set above the equilibrium real wage to enable the firm to attract
the most productive workers and motivate them to work hard and discourage
them from quitting).
Unemployment Benefits Unemployment benefits increase the natural
unemployment rate by lowering the opportunity cost of job search.
There are two controversies that surround the natural unemployment rate. The first is
the use of the term “natural,” which offends many who believe any unemployment is
always a bad thing. From the perspective of an unemployed individual who has yet to
find the job he or she wants, unemployment is bad. However, there is some level of
unemployment that is good for society because it will help create more productive
matches between firms and workers and allow for technological changes that lead to
economic growth. The second controversy is what level of unemployment corresponds
to the natural rate. Because this number is unobserved, it must be estimated. Some
estimates imply the natural rate is stable and changes only slowly over time. Others
imply that most of the fluctuations in unemployment are “natural”. These differences
are important for macroeconomic policy because one of the typical goals of policy is to
keep the unemployment rate from making wide swings around the natural rate.
dissatisfied with a job could quit and be assured of a new job (often at higher pay!)
within a few days. Indeed, firms paid for expensive radio advertisements “begging” for
workers to apply for jobs.
The Economics in the News discusses “Job Growth at Full Employment.” It shows how
the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate have interacted with each
other as the economy reached full employment.
Additional Problems
1. Michigan: Unemployment Record Holder
Michigan now holds a dubious record: It leads the U.S. in joblessness. The
state’s unemployment rate was 8.5% in May while the U.S. unemployment
rate was only 5.5%. The reason is clear: Detroit’s emphasis on big trucks
and sport-utility vehicles has turned sour. But even though the official
unemployment numbers look awful, the reality is worse. The official
number does not reflect those who have given up looking for a job.
Business Week, June 24, 2008
In 2010, at 13.6 percent of the state’s labor force, Michigan had the
nation’s highest official unemployment rate. But in 2012, Michigan’s
unemployment rate fell to 9 percent, a larger fall than that in the United
States as a whole. Around 11,000 businesses in Michigan produce high-
tech scientific instruments and components for defense equipment, energy
plants, and medical equipment.
a. Why was the reality of the unemployment problem in Michigan actually
worse than the 8.5 percent unemployment rate statistic in 2008?
b. Was this higher unemployment rate in Michigan frictional, structural, or
cyclical? Explain.
c. What factor led to the favorable 2012 employment results in Michigan
compared to the U.S. average? Was this a frictional, structural or cyclical
factor? Explain.
2. The Great Inflation Bias
In 1996 the Boskin Commission was established to determine the accuracy
of the CPI. The commission concluded that the CPI overstated inflation by
1.1%. The commission described four biases in the way the CPI was
determined.
Fortune, April 3, 2008
a. What are the main sources of bias that are generally believed to make the
CPI overstate the inflation rate? By how much did Boskin estimate the CPI
overstates the inflation rate?
b. Do the substitutions among different kinds of meat make the CPI biased
up or down?
c. Why does it matter if the CPI overstates or understates the rate of
inflation?
d. What steps has the BLS taken since 1996 to lower the bias?
unemployed. If a company has announced that it will be laying off workers in the
future, its workers are measured as employed even though they will shortly join
the ranks of the unemployed.
b. The higher unemployment rate in Michigan is structural. Consumers are
decreasing the number of U.S.-made large cars in favor of foreign-made smaller
cars. And to the extent that consumers are buying U.S.-made cars, they are
generally smaller cars, many of which are not manufactured in Michigan. So the
skills possessed by Michigan workers are not the skills needed for jobs and the
location of workers in Michigan is not the location of available jobs.
c. The improved labor statistics for Michigan reflected a structural factor in that
industries with goods in high demand were able to move to Michigan and use
retrained skilled workers for their production.
2. a. The Boskin Commission presented four reasons why the CPI overstates the
inflation rate. The four sources of bias are the new goods bias (new goods often
cost more than the good they replace); quality change bias (price hikes might
reflect quality changes); commodity change bias (changes in relative price lead
consumers to switch away from goods and services whose price has risen more
rapidly than other goods and services); and, outlet substitution bias (people buy
from lower-priced sources when prices rise). The Boskin Commission estimated
that the CPI overstates the inflation rate by 1.1 percentage points.
b. Substitutions among different types of meat biases the CPI upward because the
CPI ignores these substitutions. For instance, if the price of beef rises and the
price of chicken does not change, then consumers respond by switching from
beef to chicken. Consumers will eat (approximately) the same amount of protein
as before but the substitution of chicken for beef means that their expenditure
on protein will not change by the full amount of the price rise for beef. The CPI
ignores this substitution and assumes that people buy the same amount of beef
as before. Therefore the CPI erroneously reports that expenditure on protein has
risen by the full amount of the price hike of beef. The article says that when
consumers respond to a change in relative price by switching from one type of
meat to another, the price of the new type can’t be compared to the price of the
old type because consumers prefer the old type of meat to the new one.
However the article’s statement can’t be literally true because consumers
generally cannot think the second type of meat ranks at zero compared to the
first type of meat. Hence allowing for no substitution biases the CPI upward
because consumers will substitute from one meat to another when relative
prices change.
c. Many decisions depend on the CPI and any errors in the CPI will lead to errors in
these decisions. For instance, some wage contracts are linked to the CPI. If the
CPI overstates inflation, then the firms pay too much and some workers might
lose their jobs if the firm decides to fire them. Conversely if the CPI understates
inflation, then workers are paid too little. Additionally the government links about
a third of its expenditures, including Social Security payments, to the CPI, If the
CPI overstates inflation, then government outlays rise more rapidly than justified
whereas if the CPI understates inflation, then outlays do not rise enough to offset
the true inflation rate.
d. The BLS has now corrected much of the bias with more frequent expenditure
surveys to avoid substitution bias and by using statistical methods to lessen new
goods and quality change bias. The bias in today’s CPI is almost certainly less
than it was in 1996, but some remains.
match between worker and job will be poor: The firm is eager to find a
worker and the worker accepts the offered job to end his or her spell of
unemployment. But then as time passes the match is discovered to be
poor—the worker does not perform well and/or dislikes the job. This
situation is bad for the business and bad for the worker.
5. How do you think the business cycle affects the duration of
unemployment? On the average, unemployment has a longer duration in
recessions and a shorter duration in expansions.
6. Why is a change in the age structure of the population, increasing
the proportions of young or old workers in the labor force, likely
to change the natural unemployment rate? When the proportion of
young workers increases, the natural unemployment rate rises because
young workers change jobs more frequently than experienced workers. As
these young workers change their jobs, frictional unemployment and,
therefore, natural unemployment rise. Older workers are less prone to
change jobs because they have had more time to find a good job match.
The frictional unemployment rate is lower and so, too, is the natural
unemployment rate when the proportion of old workers in the labor force is
higher.
7. What is the natural unemployment rate? What is the controversy
concerning its measurement? The natural unemployment rate is the
unemployment rate when the economy is at full employment. The natural
rate is comprised of frictional and structural unemployment. One
controversy arises because it is difficult to measure frictional and structural
unemployment. Another controversy arises because the issue of whether
discouraged workers and marginally attached workers should be included
in the natural rate is unclear. While the number of these workers can be
measured with reasonable accuracy, whether they should be included in
the natural rate is controversial.