Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decision Support System For Optimum Soft Clay Improvement Technique For Highway Construction Projects
Decision Support System For Optimum Soft Clay Improvement Technique For Highway Construction Projects
net/publication/335240495
Decision Support System for Optimum Soft Clay Improvement Technique For
Highway Construction Projects
CITATIONS READS
0 110
3 authors:
Rana Khallaf
Future University in Egypt
12 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmed Ebid on 27 September 2019.
Civil Engineering
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Identifying a soft clay improvement strategy is a main challenging in highway construction projects due
Received 30 March 2019 to the various conditions involved. Hence, the objective of this paper is to present a Decision Support
Revised 26 July 2019 System (DSS) to select the optimum soft clay improvement technique for this type of projects. Value
Accepted 13 August 2019
Engineering (VE) is integrated with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for the proposed (DSS). Using
Available online xxxx
the AHP provides a robust means of identifying the relative importance of any criteria or factors for soft
clay improvement alternatives. The scope of this study includes four of the most commonly used tech-
Keywords:
niques for soft clay improvement: soil replacement, pre-loading, vertical drains, and the construction
DSS
VE
of embankments on piles. The proposed methodology was verified using four case studies of highways
AHP under construction in northern Egypt. The results show that the proposed (DSS) successfully predicted
Soft clay improvement the optimum soft clay improvement technique in three out of the four cases.
Highway embankment Ó 2019 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams Uni-
versity. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Introduction to construct a granular filter on the soft soil, load it with embank-
ment load and wait until the soft layer consolidates then reshape
Multiple challenges face construction projects in achieving the the distorted embankment and construct the road (referred to as
project objectives while balancing all the constraints. Therefore, embankment with pre-loading). The third technique is similar to
it is crucial to explore all possible approaches that would help the second one but adds the utilization of vertical drains (wick
reach the project objectives related to cost, time, performance, drains) to speed up the consolidation process (referred to as
and quality. For highway construction projects, soft clay improve- embankment with vertical drains). The fourth alternative, denoted
ment is one of the main items that affect both the cost and time of embankment on piles uses a recently developed system in which
a project. This is particularly important when the highway is the embankment is supported on a grid of piles connected by
founded on a surface layer of soft clay. The main target of soft clay two perpendicular layers of geo-grid at the ground surface. The
improvement in this case is to enhance the mechanical properties arching effect generated in the embankment soil and the tie action
of the existing soft soil. This enables it to support the weight of the provided by the geo-grid layers act together as virtual raft transfer-
highway embankment and the traffic loads acting on it with ring the embankment loads to the grid of piles. A small cap on each
acceptable safety factors and embankment settlement as per the pile is used to prevent punching [31].
project specifications. In this study, four soft clay improvement
alternative techniques are considered. One of these technique is 2. Objective
to replace the whole soft layer with compacted granular soil
(referred to as embankment on replacement), the second one is The aim of this research is to develop a decision support system
(DSS) for optimum soft clay improvement of highway sloped
embankments on soft clay during the early design phase. Value engi-
⇑ Corresponding author. neering (VE) integrated with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and
E-mail addresses: ibrahim.mahdi@fue.edu.eg (I.M. Mahdi), ahmed.abdelkha- Delphi are used to develop this assessment approach. The developed
leq@fue.edu.eg (A.M. Ebid), rana.khallaf@fue.edu.eg (R. Khallaf).
(DSS) considered eight factors which are cost, construction duration,
Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University.
constructability, sustainability, environmental impact, risk impact
and safety, technology impact, and infrastructure conflict to recom-
mend the optimum improvement technique considering all points
of view not just the cost reduction one. Also, using AHP provides a
Production and hosting by Elsevier
robust tool for identifying the relative level of importance of the cri-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
2090-4479/Ó 2019 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
2 I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx
teria used for the selection of the optimum soft clay improvement educated opinions to make decisions. The objective of an MCDM is
alternative. The following sections describe the Value Engineering, to structure a problem and identify and evaluate the multiple cri-
Delphi technique, and the AHP conducted in this study. The pro- teria available. These techniques have been used in construction
posed (DSS) is verified using highway under-construction projects management research in areas such as highway management, pro-
in the north of Egypt at current market conditions. ject delivery methods, and risk identification and ranking
[15,32,14,13]. However, no previous research has proposed a DSS
3. Background for soil improvement techniques. In this paper, the selected MCDM
technique is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
3.1. Value engineering
3.3. Delphi technique
The construction industry faces numerous challenges in its effort
to achieve project objectives while maintaining project constraints. The Delphi technique is a tool used to collect data and achieve
Therefore, the optimum strategy is to study all possible approaches consensus on an issue. An advantage of this methodology is that it
that increase the value with minimum effort, cost, and time while does not require all experts to be physically located in one place,
achieving optimal performance and quality. Value Engineering which makes it easier to identify experts without any geographic
(VE) was introduced to the construction industry during the late constraints. It also eliminates biases since all experts provide input
nineteen fifties and has been employed worldwide for over 60 years. individually and are not swayed by group dynamics. Multiple
Since its early beginnings, this technique has been widely applied in rounds are conducted to achieve consensus between participants
construction projects [22,7,16,4,10]. VE is a systematic approach, to facilitate decision-making. Hallowell and Gambatese [9]
which aims at achieving value for money by providing all necessary reported that usually 1 to 3 rounds are conducted in a study, which
functions at the lowest cost. Chen et al. [4] classified VE as an orga- mainly depends on the presence of consensus or dissent in the
nized application that uses both technical knowledge and common results of each round. It has been widely used in construction man-
sense to identify and eliminate unnecessary project costs and agement research for reporting and decision-making among other
thereby achieve value-for-money. Chavan [3] categorized VE as uses [21,29,13].
one of the most appropriate and systematic techniques to improve
value in construction projects. The VE process explores con-
3.4. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
structability, manufacturability, and maintainability of a project at
the early stages and thereby identifies potential conflicts as well as
It was developed by Saaty [26–27]. The AHP is used to calculate
savings [24,17,5]. The VE process, denoted as a VE job plan, is an
the relative importance and weighting of multiple alternatives and
organized problem-solving technique which consists of several
consists of the following steps: (i) creating a hierarchical arrange-
phases, namely, information, creativity, evaluation, development,
ment of criteria (goals); (ii) performing pair-wise comparison of
and proposal. The creativity phase is the most crucial phase to pro-
criteria and alternatives in the comparison matrix using a proper
duce innovative ideas. This phase requires existing information
scale; (iii) pair-wise evaluation of elements in the hierarchy (goals,
and experiential knowledge from past projects [23]. Dell’lsolla [7]
criteria (sub-criteria) and alternatives); and (iv) calculation of the
utilized his wide practical experience in the construction manage-
maximal eigenvectors (kmax) and the consistency index
ment and value engineering to declare that VE should be performed
CI ¼ kmax
n1
n
. The consistency of the decision is obtained with con-
as early as possible before securing of funds, approval of services,
sistency ratio CR. If in the comparison matrix CR is less than 0.10,
systems, or design to maximize the value. Potential savings from
then the estimated relative importance of the criteria (priority of
VE applications are much greater with its early application. When
the alternative) is deemed acceptable.
VE is applied at a later stage, increased investment is required to
implement any changes as well as more effort to withstand potential
stronger resistance to change. 3.5. Soft clay improvement techniques for highway projects
Value Engineering (VE) can be viewed as a rigorous, interdisci-
plinary problem solving technique, which focuses on improving 3.5.1. Embankments on soil replacement
the value of the functions that are required to accomplish the This alternative is based on replacing the entire top soft layer
objective of any product, process, service, or organization. The with well-compacted granular soil. The replacement layer should
highest performance in VE is achieved when the focus is mainly be extended horizontally beyond the toe of the slope from both
to increase the value rather than to reduce the costs. Gudem sides at a distance equal to its thickness to ensure that the dissi-
et al. [8] stated that implementing VE in projects can bring about pated embankment load will be contained within the replacement
numerous benefits, such as reducing costs by 20% to 30%, enhanc- layer, as shown in Fig. 1a. It is a simple technique to improve the
ing operational performance by 40% to 50%, and upgrading product soil strength beneath the embankment utilizing the same kind of
quality by 30% to 50%. The application of VE in this research is lim- labor and equipment used for the construction of the embankment.
ited to the determination of the optimum technique to improve This technique may be suitable for top soft layers up to 3.0 m thick,
soft clay layers underlying the highway sloped embankment of but it is uneconomical for thicker layers.
highway projects during the conceptual design phase.
Value study generally involves three stages: (i) pre-workshop 3.5.2. Embankments with pre-loading
(preparation); (ii) workshop (execution of the six-phase job Plan); In this technique, the soil beneath the embankment is improved
and (iii) post-workshop (documentation and implementation) by using the weight of the embankment itself as pre-loading on the
[28]. The most crucial phases in the VE methodology are the func- top soft layer. The soft soil tends to consolidate under loading and
tional analysis, the creativity in finding alternatives, and the eval- the excess water dissipates into the adjacent permeable layers.
uation process. However, consolidation is a very slow process, which may need
weeks or even months to achieve the desired effect depending
3.2. Decision support systems on the properties and the thickness of the soft layer. Because of
that, it is a common practice to use a granular filter on the top of
Decision support systems such as multi-criteria decision- the soft layer to speed up the consolidation process, as shown in
making (MCDM) are created to channel expert judgment and form Fig. 1b. The thickness of this filter is designed to ensure that the
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx 3
Fig. 1. Soft clay improvement techniques: (a) Replacement, (b) Pre-loading, (c) Vertical drains and (d) Embankment on piles.
volume of the voids between the particles is large enough to structural system that can transfer the embankment loads to the
absorb the excess water from the consolidating soft layer. It is a piles, as shown in Fig. 1d. This mechanism is based on dividing
common practice to use a geotextile layer below the embankment the embankment loads into three parts. The first part contains
to act as a filter that allows water to pass through and prevents soil the soil in and above the arching zone and is transferred directly
particles from moving. In addition, two perpendicular layers of to the piles by arching action. The second and third parts consist
geo-grid are commonly used below the embankment to increase of the soil below the arching zone. The second part is transferred
the global stability and minimize the differential settlement to the piles through the geo-grid while the third part is supported
caused by consolidation (Sadok et al. [25]). directly on the soft soil layer and causes it to settle [30]. In order to
minimize the third part, van Eekelen [30] recommends that the
3.5.3. Embankments with vertical drains spacing between piles be kept at less than 2.5 m and that the min-
This technique is commonly used for thicker soft-top layers imum embankment height to be equal to 0.66 times the spacing.
(>9.0 m). It uses the same concept of consolidation described pre-
viously with one additional enhancement. Instead of waiting for
4. Methodology
the water to flow through the soft layer to the top or bottom sur-
face, which may take a considerable amount of time, a fast track
4.1. Estimating cost and construction duration for each alternative
vertical path is provided by using vertical sand drains or vertical
wick drains to direct the water from the top filter layer down to
In order to estimate the cost and duration (for construction) of
the permeable bottom layer (refer to Fig. 1c). This system consid-
each alternative, structural design must be carried out to deter-
erably speeds up the consolidation. The down side is that sand
mine the dimensions, specifications, and quantities of materials
drains cost almost as much as piles, while wick drains need special
used. The technical bases of this structural design are described
equipment and highly skilled labor to install [19]. Like pre-loading
for each alternative in Appendix A.
technique, two layers of geo-grid and one layer of geotextile are
used below the embankment.
4.2. Development of the decision support system (DSS) for optimum
3.5.4. Embankments on piles soft clay improvement technique of sloped embankments
This technique avoids loading the top soft layer altogether.
Instead, the loads from the embankment are transferred down to Selecting the optimum technique depends on many factors such
the supporting strata using piles. To achieve this goal without as the soft layer thickness, embankment height, existing highway
using a concrete raft, a combination of arching action in embank- constraints, as well as the characteristics of soft clay improvement
ment soil and tie action in geo-grid layers is utilized to form a technique. In this study, eight factors are considered to identify the
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
4 I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx
optimum soft clay improvement alternative. These factors are: (1) to 12 m and using an embankment length equal to 100 m and
cost; (2) construction duration; (3) constructability; (4) sustain- thicknesses of the soft clay layer ranging from 1 m to 9 m. Hence,
ability; (5) environmental impact; (6) risk impact and safety; (7) the cost and duration for each case were calculated using the aver-
technology impact; and (8) infrastructure conflict. These eight fac- age current prices and productivity in the Egyptian market, which
tors are evaluated and ranked using the Delphi technique. are illustrated in Table 1. Those prices were collected from BOQ &
The DSS that combines AHP and Delphi for soft clay improve- Specifications department of (NECB) consultancy firm.
ment alternatives (SIA) with respect to all eight evaluation factors Based on the calculated values, the relative weights for both the
were conducted in one excel sheet for ease of use. The output of cost and the duration for each alternative were calculated for each
this (DSS) is relative weights (or scores) of each alternative for a combination of embankment height and thickness of clay layer.
certain combination of embankment height and thickness of the Tables 2 and 3 show the calculated weights for each alternative.
soft clay layer considering all eight evaluation factors. The alterna- Sample of the calculations is presented in Appendix B.
tive with the highest weight (score) is the optimum choice for that
combination.
5.2. Identifying the relative weights of the factors using the Delphi
technique
5. Applying the developed (DDS) on case of Egypt at present
conditions Eight Egyptian highway construction experts were involved in
this process with the following characteristics: two highway con-
The proposed methodology was applied to highway construc- sultant engineers with an experience of more than 20 years, two
tion projects in Egypt considering the present conditions such as heads of technical office of highway construction companies with
material prices, labor productivity and equipment availability. an experience of more than 15 years, two senior highway design
The details of the calculations are presented in the following engineers with an experience of more than 10 years, and two fac-
sections. ulty staff members at universities (one specialized in soil mechan-
ics and the other specialized in construction management) with an
5.1. Estimating cost and construction duration for each alternative experience of more than 20 years each. The experts were asked to
assess the four soft clay improvement techniques in terms of the
Quantities of each alternative were calculated using eight factors considered. These factors are: cost, construction dura-
Eqs. (1)–(17) (see appendix) for embankment heights from 1 m tion, constructability, sustainability, environmental impact, risk
Table 1
Considered unit price, number of crew, and crew productivity.
Item Unit Cost (LE)/Unit Crew productivity (/month) No. of crew Total productivity (/month)
Pavement (m2) 300 1200 2 2400
road base (m3) 100 4500 2 9000
Pitching (m2) 150 125 6 750
Embankment (m3) 200 4000 6 24,000
Replace./Filter (m3) 250 2000 6 12,000
Wick drain (m) 100 12,000 1 12,000
Geo-grid (m2) 100 7500 1 7500
Pile (m3) 8000 2500 1 2500
Indirect cost (/month) 200,000
Table 2
Samples of relative weights of soft clay improvement alternatives with respect to the cost factor.
Table 3
Samples of relative weights of soft clay improvement alternatives with respect to the time factor.
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx 5
impact and safety, technology impact, and infrastructure conflict. calculated for both factors. The results of the AHP are summarized
After collecting and analyzing the results, they were sent to the in Table 5. Sample of the calculations is presented in Appendix B.
experts for a second round. The results received showed some dis-
sent so a third round was necessary. The results of applying the 5.4. Mapping the optimum improvement technique using the
Delphi method for the considered eight factors are illustrated in developed (DSS)
Table 4. Sample of the calculations is presented in Appendix B.
Combining relative weights of each alternative with respect to
cost and duration with those of the remaining evaluating factors
5.3. Development of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) model and triangulating them using the results of the Delphi methodol-
ogy for each combination of embankment height and soft clay
The AHP process was used as described in the previous section to layer thickness gives a clear map for the optimum choice of soft
estimate the relative weights of soft clay improvement alternatives clay improvement for any combination. This map is illustrated in
with respect to six of the eight evaluation factors: constructability, Table 6 and can be used by researchers or practitioners to deter-
sustainability, environmental impact, risk impact and safety, tech- mine the optimum method to choose in case of similar conditions
nology impact, and infrastructure conflict. The remaining factors to those in Egypt.
(cost and duration) were calculated depending on the respective
characteristics of each alternative since quantitative data could be 5.5. Varifiing the optimum improvement technique map
Table 4
Relative weights of evaluation factors using Del- The (DSS) optimum choices shown in Table 7 were selected
phi method. directly from Table 6 based on embankment height and thickness
Evaluation factors Relative weight
of soft clay layer and verified using case studies of highway pro-
jects under-construction in Northern Egypt where soft clay layers
Cost 41.5%
Construction duration 23.7%
are commonly encountered. (NECB) was the contractor’s consul-
Constructability 7.6% tant in the following four case studies:
sustainability 4.2%
Environmental impact 5.1%
(i) 30 June highway – Port Said; it is a new strategic highway
Risk impact and safety 5.9%
Technology impact 4.2% passes in the soft clay at Suez Canal zone. The embankment
Infrastructure conflict 7.6% at the considered section was 6.0 height (at crossing tunnel)
and was located on 32.0 to 35.0 m thick soft clay, the soil
Table 5
Relative weights of soft clay improvement alternatives with respect to evaluation factors.
Soft clay improvement alternative Constructability Sustainability Environmental Risk and Safety Technology Infrastructure
Alt.1 Embankment on Replacement 32% 32% 12% 32% 16% 30%
Alt.2 Embankment with Pre-Loading 38% 14% 34% 38% 14% 40%
Alt.3 Embankment with VL. drains 12% 16% 33% 12% 36% 12%
Alt.4 Embankment on piles 18% 38% 21% 18% 34% 18%
Table 6
Optimum soft clay improvement alternatives for different embankment heights and soft layer thickness.
Table 7
Case study results.
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
6 I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx
report suggested both pre-loading and vertical drains tech- ment height between (3.0–12.0 m). This mapping leads to the
niques to improve the soft layer and the contractors (DETAC following findings:
Co. & Misr Delta Co.) chose the vertical drains techniques.
(ii) Port Said-Damietta highway; the location was at the approach For thin soft soil layers (3.0–4.0 m thick), replacement is the
of Ashtom-Elgamil bridge near Port-Said. Embankment optimum choice regardless of embankment height. This makes
height was 4.0 m and rested on 26.0 m of soft clay. Both con- sense because it eliminates any negative impact of soft soil lay-
sultant and contractor (EL-Safa Co.) agreed to use piles option. ers at a reasonable cost and with little impact on time and
(iii) Banha-El Mansoura highway; the considered zone was the constructability.
approach of new bridge at Kafr-Shokr village, approach For soft clay layers thicker than 4.0 m, the embankment height
height was 5.5 m and rested on 9.0 m of soft clay. Both has a greater significance on deciding the optimum soft clay
replacement and piles techniques were suggested in the soil improvement technique. In case of lower embankment heights
report and the contractor (SAMCO) chose the replacement (up to 5 m), embankment on piles technique is the most suit-
alternative. able choice. This result is reasonable because the relatively
lightweight embankment significantly reduces the cost of piles.
(iv) Zagazeg – Elsemballawen highway, this project aims to dou-
On the other hand, for thicker embankments (more than 5 m),
ble the width of the existing highway, the embankment
the best choice for soft clay improvement is the vertical drains
height was varied between 5.0 m in typical sections and
technique. This result is logical because this technique is much
8.0 m at crossing tunnels, that soft clay layer thickness was
cheaper than piles and a noticeable reduction in indirect cost is
about 2.0 to 4.5 m and the contractor was El-Salam Interna-
also realized by avoiding the longer construction duration
tional Co. which carried out the recommended replacement
required for a piled alternative.
layer as per soil report.
Embankment with pre-loading is the optimum choice for a lim-
ited range of conditions. For thicknesses of the soft clay layer in
Case studies locations are shown in Fig. 2. Real recommended
the 3.0–4.0 m range and embankment heights of more than
improvement techniques were collected by the authors from their
9.0 m, this technique is suitable. This is because the relatively
consulting work. Verification results shows good matching between
long time required to construct the high embankment is suffi-
the actual chosen soft clay improvement technique and the pro-
cient to consolidate the relatively thin soft clay layer, which
posed optimum technique calculated by the (DSS). The improve-
minimizes the indirect cost of the project.
ment technique recommended in real-life matched the technique
calculated using the (DSS) in three out of four of the projects.
It should be noted that these findings are based on the relative
weights, prices, and rates of productivity that are used in the DSS.
6. Verification results and discussion This makes the findings valid for highway construction projects in
Egypt in the current (2018) market conditions and the boundaries
Table 6 summarized the results of applying the developed (DSS) between alternatives will shift with changes in the weights and
considering the present conditions in Egypt. It covers all combina- market conditions.
tions of soft clay thickness between (1.0 to 9.0 m) and embank-
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx 7
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
8 I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx
2
Pile volume ðm3 Þ ¼ H slope ðL stock þ H clayÞ=400 ð15Þ B. Sample of Cost and Time Calculations:
Time and cost for the previously calculated BOQ could be calcu-
Total volume of piles ðm Þ 3
lated using the unit prices and productivity rates listed in Table 1
¼ Pile volume Required land area=6:25 ð16Þ as follows:
For embankment on soil replacement
Regarding the two layers of geo-grid, they area could be calcu-
lated considering 50% lap as follows:
Item Cost (LE) Time (month)
Geo grid Area ðm2 Þ ¼ 1:5 2 Required land area ð17Þ
Pavement 1800 300 1800/2400
Eqs. (1)–(17) were used to calculate the quantities and duration = 540 000 = 0.75
needed for each alternative. The Application section provides the Base layer 700 100 700/9000
steps taken and a discussion of the steps for the proposed DSS. = 70 000 = 0.08
Embankment 11200 200 11 200/24 000
Appendix B. (Sample of DSS Calculations) = 2 240 000 = 0.47
Slope pitching 2200 150 2200/750
A. Sample of BOQ Calculations: = 330 000 = 2.93
The BOQ of different alternatives for embankment length, Replacement 12600 250 12 600/12 000
height and top width of 100.0 m, 4.0 m and 20.0 m respectively = 3 150 000 = 1.05
with side slopes of 1V:2H rested on 3.0 m thick soft clay layer Site preparation – 4200/4200
could be calculated as follows: = 1.0
Indirect cost 6.3 200 000 –
= 1 260 000
Pavement area (m2) Total 7 590 000 6.30
= ð20:0 2:0Þ 100:0 = 1800
Base layer volume (m3)
= 0:35 20:0 100:0 = 700 For embankment with pre-loading
Embankment volume (m3)
= 100:0 4:0 ð20 þ 2 4:0Þ = 11200 Item Cost (LE) Time (month)
Slope pitching area (m2) Pavement 1800 300 1800/2400
= ð4:5 4:0 þ 4:0Þ 100:0 = 2200 = 540 000 = 0.75
For embankment on soil replaceement (H rep = 3.0 m) Base layer 700 100 700/9000
Required land area (m2) = 70 000 = 0.08
= ð20:0 þ 4 4:0 þ 2 3:0Þ 100 = 4200 Embankment 11 200 200 11 200/24 000
Volume of replacement (m3) = 2 240 000 = 0.47
= 4200 3:0 = 12600 Slope pitching 2200 150 2200/750
For embankment with pre-loading (H rep = 0.5 m) = 330 000 = 2.93
Filter thickness (m) = 3:0=6 = 0.5 Filter 1850 250 1850/12 000
Required land area (m2) = 462 500 = 0.15
= ð20:0 þ 4 4:0 þ 2 0:5Þ 100 = 3700 Site preparation – 3700/4200
Filter volume (m3) = 3700 0:5 = 1850 = 0.88
Consolidation time (month) = 3:02 =3 = 3.0 Geotextile 3700 100 3700/7500
Geotextile area (m2) = 3700 = 3700 = 370 000 = 0.50
Geo-grid area (m2) = 2 3700 = 7400 Geo-grid 7400 100 7400/7500
For embankment with vertical drains (H rep = 0.5 m) = 740 000 = 1.00
Filter thickness (m) = 3:0=6 = 0.5 Consolidation time – 3.0
Required land area (m2) Indirect cost 9.76 200 000 –
= ð20:0 þ 4 4:0 þ 2 0:5Þ 100 = 3700 = 1 952 000
Filter volume (m3) = 3700 0:5 = 1850 Total 6 704 500 9.76
Geotextile area (m2) = 3700 = 3700
Geo-grid area (m2) = 2 3700 = 7400
Consolidation time (month) = 3:0=3 = 1.0 For embankment with vertical drains
Total wick drain length (m)
= 0:25 3700 ð3:0 þ 0:5Þ = 3238 Item Cost (LE) Time (month)
For embankment on piles (H rep = 0.0 m)
Required land area (m2) Pavement 1800 300 1800/2400
= ð20:0 þ 4 4:0 þ 2 0:0Þ 100 = 3600 = 540 000 = 0.75
Pile Diameter (D) (m) = 4:0=18 = 0.22 Base layer 700 100 700/9000
Stock length (L stock) (m) = 0:4 4:0 = 1.60 = 70 000 = 0.08
Pile length (m) =Max½10mOrð1:6 þ 3:0Þ = 10.0 Embankment 11 200 200 11 200/24 000
3 2 = 2 240 000 = 0.47
Pile volume (m ) = 0:785 0:22 10:0 = 0.38
Slope pitching 2200 150 2200/750
Total volume of piles (m3) = 0:38 3600=6:25 = 219
= 330 000 = 2.93
Geo-grid Area (m2) = 1:5 2 3600 = 10800
Filter 1850 250 1850/12 000
= 462 500 = 0.15
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx 9
Similarly, the relative weights of alternatives shown in the 1st The optimum improvement techniques for each of four cases in
column of Table 3 could be calculated as the ratio between mini- Table 7 were selected directly from Table 6 based on the embank-
mum duration to alternative duration as follows: ment height and soft clay thickness.
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
10 I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx
References [5] Cooke J. Improving the value of products and processes by combining value
analysis techniques and lean methods with TRIZ. In: TRIZ FUTURE
CONFERENCE – Global Innovation Convention. p. 2.
[1] Bowles J. Foundation analysis and design. 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-
[6] Das B. Advanced soil mechanics. New York, NY, USA: Taylor & Francis; 2008.
Hill; 1997.
[7] Dell’lsolla AJ. Value engineering: Practical Applicationsfor Design,
[2] Brockenbrough R. Highway engineering handbook: building and rehabilitating
Construction, Maintenance and Operation, 1997. Kingston, USA: R.S.Means;
the infrastructure. 3rd ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2009.
1998.
[3] Chavan AJ. Value engineering in construction industry. Int J Appl Innov Eng
[8] Gudem M, Steinert M, Welo T, Leifer L. Redefining customer value in lean
Manage 2013;2(12):18–26.
product development design projects. J Eng, Des Technol 2013;11(1):71–89.
[4] Chen WT, Chang PY, Huang YH. Assessing the overall performance of value
[9] Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi
engineering workshops for construction projects. Int J Project Manage 2010;28
method to CEM research. J Constr Eng Manage 2010:99–107. doi: https://doi.
(5):514–27.
org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137.
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
I.M. Mahdi et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal xxx (xxxx) xxx 11
[10] Ismail A, Aminzadeh R, Aram A, Arshad I. Science publications value Ibrahim Mahmoud Mahdi is a Professor of Project
engineering application in highway projects applying lean thinking in Management at the Future University in Egypt. He
construction and performance improvement. Am J Eng Appl Sci 2010;3 received his Ph.D. from University of Southampton,
(4):699–703. England UK. Dr. Mahdi has over 30 years of professional
[12] Kezdi, A. Stabilized earth roads. Copyright (r) by Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, experience in all project management aspects including
Hungary; 1979. Planning; Cost a, Risk management and Project Control.
[13] Khallaf R, Naderpajouh N, Hastak M. A systematic approach to develop risk He has been responsible for many assignments of highly
registry frameworks for complex projects. Built Environ Project Asset Manage technical projects in Egypt, Kuwait and Gulf area espe-
2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2017-0051. cially KSA and UAE. His experience includes Preparing
[14] Li F, Phoon KK, Du X, Zhang M. Improved AHP method and its application in
tender’s packages; receiving and analyzing tenders,
risk identification. J Constr Eng Manage ASCE 2013;139:312–20.
making consultant and contractor recommendations,
[15] Liang R, Pensomboon G. Multicriteria decision-making approach for highway
slope hazard management. J Infrastruct Syst 2010;16:50–7. issuing, executing and administering contracts; and
[16] Male S, Kelly J, Gronqvist M, Graham D. Managing value as a management finally, supervising the construction to insure quality and schedule requirements
style for projects. Int J Project Manage 2007;25(2):107–14. are met Dr. Mahdi has wide work experience in education and practicing project
[17] Nawi MM, Jalaluddin SMFWS, Zulhumadi F, Ibrahim JA, Baharum F. A strategy management.
for improving construction projects sustainability through value management
approach. Int J Appl Eng Res 2014;9(24):28377–85.
[18] NAVFAC DM-7.02 (Naval Facilities Engineering Command) (1986). Found Ahmed M. Ebid is an Assistant Professor at the Future
Earth Struct.; 1986. University in Egypt. He received his Ph.D. in soil
[19] Nicholson P. Soil improvement and ground modification methods. Elsevier Inc; mechanics from Ain-Shams Uni.-Egypt 2004. He is a
2015. consultant in both geotechnical engineering and
[20] Nikolaides A. Highway engineering pavements, materials and control of designing concrete structures since 2012, He published
quality. Ó 2015 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC; 2015. 14 researches in geotechnical engineering, soil
[21] Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example,
mechanics, repairing using FRP and optimizing the
design considerations and applications. Inform Manage 2004;42:15–29.
design of concrete elements.
[22] Palmer A, Kelly J, Male S. Holistic appraisal of value engineering in
construction in United States. J Constr Eng Manage 1996;122(4):324–8.
[23] Parker DE. Value engineering theory. Washington, D.C: Lawrence D. Miles
Value Foundation; 1985. p. 62–4.
[24] Perera S, Hayles CS, Kerlin S. An analysis of value management in practice: the
case of Northern Ireland’s construction industry. J Finan Manage Property
Constr 2011;16(2):94–110.
[25] Benmebarek Sadok, Berrabah Fouad, Benmebarek Naïma. Effect of
geosynthetic reinforced embankment on locally weak zones by numerical Rana Khallaf is an Assistant Professor at the Structural
approach. Comput Geotech 2015;65:115–25. and Construction Management Department, Faculty of
[26] Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process and the analytical network process: Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt
planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill; (FUE). Dr. Rana has over 7 years of experience working
2003.
in Egyptian and American companies in the field of
[27] Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci
construction project management consulting. She has
2008;1(1).
[28] SAVE International. Value methodology standard and body of knowledge also previously cofounded a Project Management Con-
Retrieved 2012, January 10 from http://www.value-eng.org, ; 2007. sultancy, which served US-based projects. She received
[29] Sourani A, Sohail M. The Delphi method: review and use in construction her PhD in Civil Engineering (Specialization: Construc-
management research. Int J Constr Edu Res 2015;11(1):54–76. doi: https://doi. tion Engineering and Management) from Purdue
org/10.1080/15578771.2014.917132. University in the United States. She then worked as a
[30] van Eekelen S. Basal Reinforced Piled Embankments Experiments, field studies Lecturer at Purdue University before joining the Future
and the development and validation of a new analytical design model Ph.D University in Egypt. Prior to that, she received her Bachelors and Masters degrees
thesis. Technische Universiteit Delft; 2015. from Ain shams University. She is active in research and her current interests
[31] Wahls H. Design and construction of bridge approaches. Transport Res Board include: Public-private partnerships, Integrated project delivery, Game theory, Risk
Natl Res Council 1990. analysis, Disaster risk reduction, as well as other contemporary topics.
[32] Xia B, Chan APC, Yeung JFY. Developing a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making
model for selecting Design-Build operational variations. J Constr Eng Manage
2011;137(12):1176–84.
Please cite this article as: I. M. Mahdi, A. M. Ebid and R. Khallaf, Decision support system for optimum soft clay improvement technique for highway con-
struction projects, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.007
View publication stats