Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nike Strategic Analysis
Nike Strategic Analysis
Even though Strategy is what differentiates a company from another but the strategy is not
the overall driver of the company’s success since every strategy a company makes gets
copied by rivals and sometimes the rivals copy it and implement that strategy in a more
effective and efficient way than the originator. This is why the ultimate ingredient that
differentiates the uniqueness of a company is its strategic thinking which is also called the
strategic intent.
The strategic intent and desire of Nike Corporation to lead the sports industry has caused
every other competitor in the sports industry to trail Nike. Nike is always ahead of the
competition. It believes in customer loyalty and value to the customers particularly athletes.
In order to delight its customers, Nike continuously comes up with innovative ideas and
customization in its products.
This report contains a strategic analysis of Nike Corporation. The report makes a complete
external and internal analysis of Nike thereby highlighting all the pluses and minuses of Nike
and their impact on capitalizing the opportunities and mitigating the risks that lie ahead. The
report, than moves on to the strategies that Nike could very well undertake to keep up the
edge on the competition. The financial analysis of the company is also present which
represents the soundness of the company’s financials. A complete analysis of the products
Nike is offering is made along with the strategic position of the company in the form of
space matrix. Finally the report enunciates a couple of new break through innovative
strategies Nike can come up with to give a crushing defeat to its competition.
NIKE AT A GLANCE
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The company was founded in 1964 by two men, namely Phil knight who was a middle
distance athlete, and he was also a business student of Stanford University, his partner in
this venture was Bill Bower man who was a track coach in the University of Oregon. Both of
them were talented and they realized the demand of athletic shoes in USA. When the
company was formed its initial name was “Blue Ribbon Sports”. The first store was open
Santa Monica, California in 1966.
The company introduced its Nike brand of shoes in 1972, just in time for the US Track &
Field trials, which were held in Eugene, Oregon that year. The Nike name which took its
name from the Greek Goddess of victory, had its famous “swoosh” logo designed by Carolyn
Davidson, a graphic design student at Portland State University. The company officially
renamed itself as Nike in 1978. By 1980 the company had gone public followed by an
impressive 50% market share of the US athletic shoe market.
Some wrong decisions in 1980s, particularly miscalculating the aerobics boom of that time
period caused Nike to face some downfall in the athletic footwear industry. But, changes in
the company by Phil Knight, particularly the introduction of a Michael Jordan endorsed
basket ball shoe in 1985, propelled Nike bank to the top of the industry by 1988.
The company began to diversify at that time with the purchase of Cole Haan shoes, a casual
and dress shoe manufacturing company. From this point, Nike would go on and acquire
other brands such as Bauer (1995), Hurley (2002), Converse (2003), Starter (2004) and
eventually Umbro ltd (2008).
PRODUCTS
FOOTWEAR
APPAREL
EQUIPMENT
In footwear, Nike designs and sells products that are primarily for athletic usage, although a
significant percentage of Nike customers wear them for leisure or as fashion accessory. Nike
places a great deal of emphasis on the design of the footwear as well as high quality
construction. Footwear constitutes around 70% of Nikes total revenues and sales in US.
Nike’s sports related apparel is designed to complement the company’s athletic footwear
products, and it is often sold through the same location and/or under distribution channel.
Typical apparel products include shirts with licensed college or professional team logos,
athletic bags and accessories, running shorts and baseball caps, all emblazoned with the
ubiquitous Nike “swoosh”. Apparel accounts for 25% of Nikes sales.
Sports equipments typically sold under the Nike brand names which include items such as
bags, socks, sport balls, eyewear, golf clubs, bats and gloves.
Vision:
Build a sustainable business and create value for Nike and our stakeholders by decoupling
profitable growth from constrained resources
Mission:
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTHS
1. Nike is globally recognized for being the number one sportswear brand in the
World.
2. Nike has no factories; rather it uses contract factories to get the work done
which makes it quite a lean organization.
3. Nike is quite strong regarding its research and development; quite evident
regarding its evolving and innovative product range.
4. It has a strong sense of marketing campaign by sponsoring top athletes.
5. The versatile product range makes it more competitive.
6. NIKE, Inc. includes five distinct brands, each with a powerful connection to its
customers.
7. NIKE’s products are sold in approximately 170 countries around the world.
8. NIKEid provides loyal consumers the power to design their own pair (Mass
Customization) which eventually boosted sales.
WEAKNESSES
1. Even though the organization has a diversified range for sportswear, the income
of the business, however, is still heavily dependent on footwear.
Revenues generated from footwear $ 13,426
Revenues generated from apparel $ 6,333
Revenues generated from equipments $ 1,202
2. Nike is criticized for making their products on third world countries, breaking
many labor laws and paying the workers below minimum wage to make more
many as a company
3. Inventory pile up in China and Western Europe is reducing Nike’s profits.
4. Nike products are seemed to be blurring into other product ranges. Within the
Nike Free range, there is Freerun 3.0, Freerun 5.0, Freerun+ 2ID, FlyKnit, FlyKnit
Lunar1 +ID and it can be confusing when picking a running shoe.
5. Nike is considered as “the expensive brand”
OPPORTUNITIES
1. The brand is strictly defended by its owners who believe that Nike is not a
fashion brand, however, a large number of consumers wear Nike product
because they derive a fashion trend rather than to participate in a sport.
2. There is a room for NIKE’s Revenue maximization by focusing on products other
than footwear.
3. Nike could look at investing into more types of wearable technology.
4. The business could also be developed internationally, building upon its strong
global brand recognition. There are many markets that have the disposable
income to spend on high value sports goods.
5. Growing segment of women athletes.
6. Nike has the tendency to invest more in their employee development programs
because the employees are the key resources for the organization.
7. Nike can go towards related and unrelated product diversification because of its
intense R&D and globally recognized brand name.
THREATS:
1. The market for sports shoes and sportswear is quite competitive; the
competitors are constantly developing alternative brands and techniques to take
away Nike’s market share.
2. Increased awareness of human rights
3. Increased raw material prices
4. Consumer price sensitivity is a potential external threat to Nike
5. For the multinational corporations like Nike the biggest threat is currency
fluctuations.
INTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION
(IFE MATRIX)
STRENGTHS WEIGHTAGE RATING WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
1. Globally recognized and number 1 0.10 4 0.4
sportswear brand
2. no factories 0.05 4 0.2
3. strong research and development 0.10 4 0.4
4. strong sense of marketing 0.10 4 0.4
5. versatile product range 0.05 4 0.2
6. Five distinct brands, each with a 0.05 4 0.2
powerful connection to its customers.
7. Operating in 170 countries 0.10 4 0.4
8. Mass Customization 0.05 4 0.2
WEAKNESSES
1. Heavy dependence on footwear market 0.10 1 0.1
2. criticized for making products in third 0.10 1 0.1
world countries
3. Inventory pile up in China and Western 0.05 2 0.1
Europe
4. products seemed to be blurring into 0.05 2 0.1
other product ranges
5. “the expensive brand” 0.10 1 0.1
Total 1 2.9
ANALYSIS:
The weighted average score of 2.9 reflects that Nike incorporation has strong internal
position but there is a room for further improvements.
EXTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION
(EFE MATRIX)
OPPORTUNITIES WEIGHTAGE RATING WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
1. Nike is often considered as fashion brand 0.10 4 0.4
ANALYSIS:
The weighted average score of 3.25 reflects that NIKE Inc. enjoys a strong position with
respect to its external environment.
SWOT MATRIX
STRENGHTS-S WEAKNESSES-W
1. Globally recognized and 1. Heavy dependence on
number 1 sportswear brand footwear market
2. No factories 2. criticized for making
3. Strong R&D products in third world
4. Strong sense of marketing countries
5. Versatile product range 3. inventory pileup in China
6. 5 distinct brands and Western Europe
7. Operating in 170 countries 4. Confusing product names
8. Mass customization 5. “the expensive brand”
FINDINGS:
ANALYSIS:
The above mentioned competitive profile matrix reflects that Nike is the most competitive
of the all with the weighted score of 3.9, whereas Adidas Group is the toughest competitor
for Nike Inc.
BCG MATRIX
HIGH +20
INDUSTRY FOOTWAER
GROWTH RATE APPAREL
EQUIPMENT
MEDIUM 0
LOW (-20)
SPACE MATRIX NIKE INC
After illustrating the space matrix it is obvious that Nike Inc should follow aggressive
strategies which includes forward and horizontal integration, market development, market
penetration, product development and diversification (related or unrelated).
FINANCIAL POSITION
1.00
0.50
COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY
POSITION POSITION
1 2 3 3.97
Defensive Profile
Competitive Profile
STABILITY POSITION
ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS MODEL
ELEMENTS NIKE INC.
Value proposition Nike provides the most efficient products to foster the best
possible performance of athletes
It offers ground breaking apparel, footwear and equipments
with cutting edge technology.
Customer segmentation Athletes and fitness segment
Channel Nike outlets, retailers, online stores and distinctive marketing to appeal
more customers
Customer relationships Vey high
Revenue streams A major portion of their revenues is generated from footwear market
Key resources Efficient employees
Strategic marketing innovations
Distribution network
Integrated research laboratories
Brands (Nike, Nike Golf, Converse, Hurley and Jordan)
Key activities Highly innovative product designing
Distinctive marketing strategy
Distinctive research and development
Periodic employee trainings
Effective distribution
Key partnerships Suppliers, Contract factories, advertising agencies and endorsed
athletes
Cost structures Invests heavily in R&D and Marketing
Lower manufacturing cost due to outsourcing
Low distribution cost due to distribution capability
May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Return on Sales
Gross profit margin 43.59% 43.40% 45.58% 46.28% 44.87% 45.03%
Operating profit margin 12.86% 12.60% 13.49% 13.01% 9.69% 13.07%
Net profit margin 9.82% 9.21% 10.22% 10.03% 7.75% 10.11%
Return on Investment
Return on equity (ROE) 22.28% 21.41% 21.67% 19.55% 17.11% 24.06%
Return on assets (ROA) 14.13% 14.37% 14.22% 13.23% 11.22% 15.13%
Source: Based on data from Nike Inc. Annual Reports
May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Current ratio 3.47 2.98 2.85 3.26 2.97 2.66
Quick ratio 2.31 1.82 1.94 2.32 1.93 1.68
Cash ratio 1.52 0.97 1.15 1.53 1.05 0.84
Source: Based on data from Nike Inc. Annual Reports
May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Debt to equity 0.12 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.08
Debt to capital 0.11 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.07
Interest coverage 144.17 91.39 84.65 70.92 49.93 65.18
Source: Based on data from Nike Inc. Annual Reports
May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Net fixed asset turnover 10.32 10.59 9.86 9.84 9.79 9.85
Total asset turnover 1.44 1.56 1.39 1.32 1.45 1.50
Equity turnover 2.27 2.32 2.12 1.95 2.21 2.38
Source: Based on data from Nike Inc. Annual Reports
NIKE INC., SHORT-TERM (OPERATING) ACTIVITY RATIOS
May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31, May 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 7.37 7.20 7.68 9.32 8.14 7.64
Receivables turnover 8.12 7.36 6.65 7.18 6.65 6.66
Payables turnover 15.38 15.19 14.20 15.15 18.58 14.46
Working capital turnover 2.61 3.15 2.84 2.50 2.97 3.38
Average No. of Days
Average inventory processing 50 51 48 39 45 48
period
Add: Average receivable collection 45 50 55 51 55 55
period
Operating cycle 95 101 103 90 100 103
Less: Average payables payment 24 24 26 24 20 25
period
Cash conversion cycle 71 77 77 66 80 78
Source: Based on data from Nike Inc. Annual Reports