Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.2 Apparatus:
i. S-6 Glass sided tilting flume with
manometric arrangement.
ii. Point gauge for measurement of depth of
flow in channel.
V = C √(𝑅𝑆)
Where V= velocity
C= Chezy’s Roughness Coefficient
R= Hydraulic Radius
S= Slope of the Channel
1.3.11 Manning’s Roughness Coefficient:
As we know that,
1 2/3 1/2
𝑉= 𝑅 𝑆
𝑛
Where V= velocity
n= Manning’s Roughness coefficient
R= Hydraulic Radius
S= Slope of the Channel
1.3.12 Prismatic Channel:
Channel whose dimensions & slope remains constant w.r.t time.
1.3.13 Hydraulic Radius:
It is the ratio of area over wetted parameter.
𝐴
R=
𝑃
1.4 Procedure:
i. Adjust the slope of the flume.
ii. Switch on the motor & allow the flow to stabilize in the channel.
iii. Set the flume on the constant discharge value.
iv. At the constant discharge find the three different depths of the flow at three different points
of the flow.
v. Adjust the 2nd discharge & repeat the same procedure as for the discharge 1st.
1.5 Calculations & Observations:
Flow Rate Depth of Flow (mm) Area Manning Chezzy
Wetted
of Flume of Hydraulic Velocity Coeff. Coeff.
S.No Perimeter
(m3/s) Y1 Y2 Y3 Y(avg.) Flow Radius Of Flow
(m)
(m2) (m) (m/s)
1 0.009795 67 60 57 61.33 0.0184 0.4226667 0.043533 0.53234 0.01042 57.0508
2 0.011659 69 67 65 67 0.0201 0.434 0.046313 0.58005 0.00996 60.2694
3 0.012646 71 70 68 69.67 0.0209 0.4393333 0.047572 0.60507 0.00972 62.032
4 0.014 74.6 73.8 53 67.13 0.0201 0.434 0.046406 0.695 0.0083 72.14
5 0.0159 80 75.6 65 73.53 0.0221 0.4481 0.04923 0.72 0.0084 72.4
Table 1.1: Calculations
1.6 Graphs:
c~v
80
70
60
50
40
C
30
20
10
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
V
n~c
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
n
0.004
0.002
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
c
0.01
0.008
0.006
n
0.004
0.002
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
v
1.7 Comments:
From graphs c is inversely proportional to n, n is inversely proportional to v and c is directly
proportional to v.
Job # 2
Investigation of specific energy as the function of depth of flow (y) of the
following fluid in the laboratory flume.
2.1 Objective:
i. To study the variation of specific energy as a depth of flow.
ii. To determine the percentage difference of experimental critical depth & theoretical
critical depth.
2.2 Apparatus:
i. S-6 Glass sided tilting flume with manometric arrangement.
ii. Point gauge for measurement of depth of flow in channel.
Vc = √(𝑔 ∗ yc)
2.4 Procedure:
i. Stable the constant discharge throughout the experiment.
ii. Set the slope 1:500 and find depth of flow at 3m, 4m & 5m and find average of it.
iii. Same process is repeated for different slopes.
iv. Put the date in the Excel table and calculate the specific energy by using given formulas.
v2
yc = [ q2/g]1/3 where q = Q/B , S.E = yavg + 2𝑔
v. The percentage difference of experimental critical depth & theoretical critical depth can
be find by using the formula given below.
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
Percentage Difference = 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
m³/sec mm mm mm mm m m² m/sec M
1 1:500 0.011997 61.0 69.0 70.0 66.67 0.0667 0.0200 0.5999 0.0850
2 1:300 0.011997 50.0 51.0 54.0 51.67 0.0517 0.0155 0.7740 0.0822
3 1:200 0.011997 42.0 45.0 51.0 46.00 0.0460 0.0138 0.8693 0.0845
4 1:100 0.011997 37.0 38.0 44.0 39.67 0.0397 0.0119 1.0082 0.0915
5 1:70 0.011997 32.0 32.1 33.0 32.37 0.0324 0.0097 1.2355 0.1102
Table 2.1: Calculations
0.0620
Emin = 0.0822 m
DEPTH OF FLOW (M)
0.0570
0.0517, 0.0517 0.0822, 0.0517
0.0520
v2/2g = 0.0305m
0.0460, 0.0460 0.0845, 0.0460
0.0470
0.0370 yc = 0.0517 m
0.0324, 0.0324 0.1102, 0.0324
0.0320
0.0320 0.0420 0.0520 0.0620 0.0720 0.0820 0.0920 0.1020 0.1120
SPECIFIC ENERGY (M)
S.E E=y
2.7 Comments:
The graph shows that the point (0.0822, 0.0517) have the minimum experimental specific
energy (Emin = 0.0822) & the values of yc is 0.0517. Above this point the flow is sub-critical
because yc goes on increasing & below that point flow is super critical because yc decreasing.
Job # 3
To study the characteristics of the flow over a hump/weir.
3.1 Objective:
To study the variation in the characteristics of the flow of the channel due to the
introduction of the hump or weir.
3.2 Apparatus:
i. S-6 Glass sided tilting flume with manometric arrangement.
ii. Point gauge for measurement of depth of flow in channel.
iii. Sharp cornered hump. (Broad creasted weir)
iv. Round cornered hump. (Broad creasted weir)
Where,
ΔZ = Normal hump height
Zc = Critical hump height
Figure 3. 1
Flow Parametric Condition:
y0 = y1
y1 > y2
y3 = y2
Case 2:
When ΔZ = Zc
Where,
ΔZ = Normal hump height
Zc = Critical hump height
Figure 3. 2
Flow Parametric Condition:
y0 = y1
y2 = yc
y1 > y3
y3 > y2
Case 3:
When ΔZ > Zc
Where,
y1 > y0
y2 = yc
y1 > y2
y3 > y3
y3 < y2 = yc
3.4 Procedure:
i. Fix the slope of the flume.
ii. Stable the flow at a specific discharge.
iii. Find the average values of depth before, after and at the hump.
iv. Find the horizontal distances from the starting point of the flume to the points where we
have to find the depths.
3.5 Calculations:
Sr. No. Types of Q q yc Depth of water u/s (mm)
Depth of water above hump depth of water d/s (mm) Type of flow (mm)
27.6 21.9 24.7 22 19.9 20.9 sub. Cr. sub. Cr. sup. Cr.
21.2 28 24.6 23 16.6 19.8 sub. Cr. sup. Cr. sup. Cr.
26.6 23 24.8 17.5 14.5 16 sub. Cr. sup. Cr. sup. Cr.
38.3 31.4 34.85 27.8 25 26.4 sub. Cr. sup. Cr. sup. Cr.
39.1 31 35.05 25 21.6 23.3 sub. Cr. sup. Cr. sup. Cr.
Table 3. 2: Calculations
3.6 Graphs:
Q1 FLOW DIAGRAM
140
120
100
80
DEPTH (M)
60
40
20
0
3.2 3.4 5.4 5.8 7.0 7.4
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (X) M
Q2 FLOW DIAGRAM
100
90
80
70
60
DEPTH 50
(M)
40
30
20
10
0
3.2 3.4 5.4 5.8 7.0 7.4
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (X) M
Q3 FLOW DIAGRAM
120.02
100.02
80.02
DEPTH 60.02
(M)
40.02
20.02
0.02
3.2 3.4 5.4 5.8 7.0 7.4
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (X) M
Q4 FLOW DIAGRAM
180
160
140
120
100
DEPTH (M)
80
60
40
20
0
3.2 3.4 5.4 5.6 7.0 7.4
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (X) M
Q5 FLOW DIAGRAM
200
180
160
140
120
DEPTH100
(M)
80
60
40
20
0
3.2 3.4 5.4 5.6 7.0 7.4
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (X) M
Q6 FLOW DIAGRAM
200
180
160
140
120
100(M)
DEPTH
80
60
40
20
0
3.2 3.4 5.4 5.6 7.0 7.4
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (X) M
3.7 Comments:
Type of flow depends upon the value of yc and yavg. If yc < yavg then flow is sub critical
and vice versa.
Job # 4
To Study the flow characteristics of hydraulic jump develop in lab flume.
4.1 Objective:
i. To study the physical formation of the hydraulic jump in laboratory flume.
ii. To study the physical dimension of the hydraulic jump in laboratory flume.
iii. To study the amount of energy loss in the laboratory flume due to the creation of the
hydraulic jump.
iv. To study the flow profiles of the hydraulic jump developed at different discharges.
4.2 Apparatus:
i. S-6 Glass sided tilting flume with manometric arrangement.
ii. Point gauge for measurement of depth of flow in channel.
i. Usually hydraulic jump reverses the flow of water. This phenomenon can be used to
mix chemicals for water purification.
ii. Hydraulic jump usually maintains the high water level on the downstream side. This
high water level can be used for irrigation purposes.
iii. Hydraulic jump can be used to remove the air from water supply and sewage lines to
prevent the air locking.
iv. It prevents the scouring action on the downstream side of the dam structure.
1 No Jump
4.5 Calculations:
Sr. No. Q (m3/s) q=Q/B Depth of flow before the H.J (mm) Depth of flow after the H.J (mm)
(m3/s/m) d1 d2 d3 davg d1 d2 d3 davg
1 0.00692 0.0231 18.7 18.8 20.9 19.5 86.5 111.7 128 108.7
2 0.008 0.0266 21.6 25 21.8 22.8 83.2 118.5 136.4 112.7
3 0.00894 0.0298 23.2 24.2 22.5 23.3 117.3 136.6 150 134.6
4 0.00979 0.03265 23.5 24.6 22.5 23.5 166 126.7 138.7 123.8
5 0.01326 0.0442 30.4 32 28.9 30.4 111.4 129.2 147.4 136.3
Table 4. 2: Calculations
Hz. Distance before the H.J (mm) Hz. Distance after the H.J (mm) Velocity (v=q/davg) m/s
x1 x2 x3 x1 x2 x3 Before Jump After jump
2000 2600 3400 4500 5400 6000 1.184 0.212
2400 2700 3160 4500 5400 6000 1.167 0.236
2000 2600 3380 5370 6000 6500 1.32 0.22
2200 3000 3500 4700 5500 6000 1.387 0.0263
2200 2800 3400 4500 5100 5800 1.4523 0.3394
Table 4. 3: Calculations
80
60
40
20
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
x (mm)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
x (mm)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
x (mm)
150
depth (mm)
100
50
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
x (mm)
Graph 4. 4: Graph between Depth of flow & Horizontal Distance for Q4
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
x (mm)
Graph 4. 5: Graph between Depth of flow & Horizontal Distance for Q5
4.7 Comments:
Error in final value of depth is due to the fluid flow from the sides and below the hump
which causes the error in length & energy loss.