Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STRUCTURES
GUIDED BY SUBMITTED BY
Mrs. VARNA K THANKAPPAN ZAFRIN MOHAMED
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ROLL.NO:77
IIET,NELLIKUZI S7 CE B
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CONTENTS
• Introduction
• Need for high rise buildings
• Different configurations
• Advantages
• Disadvantages
• Brief explanation of shear lag
• Conclusion
• References
INTRODUCTION
• Introduced by Fazalur Khan,Dhaka
Bangladesh
• Hollow cantilever perpendicular to
the ground
• Buildings in excess of 40 stories
• A 43-story Khan-designed De-Witt
Chestnut Apartment in Chicago
• Steel, concrete, or composite
construction
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 2/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CONCEPT OF TUBULAR
SYSTEM
• Design of strength, rigid and stable
structures
• Largely economic solution
• Building designed for resisting lateral loads
• Hollow cantilever perpendicular to ground
• Incarnation of the tubes
• Exterior-Columns and beams forms a rigid
frame
• Interior-simply framed for gravity loads
• 50% of windows
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI on exterior wall surface 5/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Cont..
• Grid like facade structures and is repetious
• Use of prefabrication possible
• Larger distance of exterior column from
NA resists bending moment
• Economically attractive and possess
torsional rigidity
• Greater flexibility in space planning
• A well known example-World Trade Centre
Cont…
• vertical extrusions of square plans
• The framed tube consist of 56 box steel
columns joint by moment resisting
connections
• The overall dimensions of framed tube
column are constant
• Wall thickness increases from top to
bottom to increse response to loads
Cont…
• Large sized windows are allowed
• Braces transfer axial load from highly
stressed column to low stressed
column
• Hence eliminates difference between
load stress
• Large scope of architecture .uses a
structural-architectural concept
14/26
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
15/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Cont…
• 780 third avanue,Metro Manhattan
office space is the first work
• Concrete shear wall for bracing in the
hull(fig)
• Off centre core allowing column free
interiors
• Accuracy,reliability and simplicity are
verified
hull
Bundled Tube
19/26
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Cont..
• Highly efficient in
economic terms
• Bundled together
in different sorts of
grouping
• Not necesserily
box shaped
Willis Tower
Burj Khalifa
Advantages of TFS
• Allows greater flexibility in planning of
interior space
• Regularity in the column schedule allows
off-site fabrication and welding
• maximum advantage is taken of the total
width of the building to resist overturning
moment
• Identical framing for all floors
• When well designed, tubular forms uses
same amount of material as in a half large
structure
22/26
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Criticism of TFS
• Reduces the size of the opening in
the building .
• At greater heights,view of outer
world is obstructed
• Shear lag
• Linear distribution of axial forces
across flange and web varies
• closely spaced columns are not
encouraged and undesirable
Shear lag
• Occurrence of non uniform
axial stress distribution
Features:-
• Positive shear lag
• Negative shear lag
• Negative shear lag-buckling
on the compression side
&cracking on tension side.
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 24/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Conclusion
• The provision of adequate, stiffness,
particularly lateral stiffness is a major
consideration In the design of a tall
building hence TFS are engineers favorite
References
1. Er. Nahant Rana,et.al.” Structural Forms Systems for Tall Building
Structures,SSRJ”, International Journal Of Civil Engineering (SSRG IJCE),
September 2014volume issued4