Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unoriented nylon-6 films were subjected to aqueous formic acid and benzyl alcohol treatments.
Formic acid was found to be more active in causing structural changes. The highest possible formic
acid concentration that could be used advantageously was found to be 50% owing to heavy shrin-
kage at higher concentrations. Solvent-induced crystallization with respect to time of treatment and
concentration of solvent revealed entirely different trends. These treatments give rise to shrinkage of
films. WAXD and IR spectroscopy revealed that crystallization results in the formation of a large
amount of monoclinic a-crystalline form. Scanning electron micrographs revealed significant changes
in surface morphology due to solvent etching.
93
INDIAN J. FIBRE TEXT. RES., SEPTEMBER 1990
where W, is the original weight; and Wz, the final were recorded using a Spectra-Physics He-Ne la-
weight. ser (output power, 5 mW) which gives polarized
light of 632.8 nm wavelength. Sample-to-film dis-
2.3 Measurement of Density tance was 7 ern. Radial intensity distribution at
Floatation technique!' was used to determine 45° azimuth was found by photomctering the
the density of film samples using n-heptane and photographic plates.
CCl.j as inert liquids.
2.8 Scanning Electron Microscopy
2.4 Measurement of Shrinkage Scanning electron micrographs were obtained
The % shrinkage was measured by noting the using an ISI-DS-130 scanning electron micro-
change in the length of film samples before and scope employing an accelerating voltage of 25 kY.
after the treatments. The measurements were car- The samples were coated with thin film of gold to
ried out on samples dried in air" at 25°C for 24 h. avoid the building up of electrostatic charge.
The % shrinkage was calculated as follows:
3 Results and Discussion
I, - 10 3.1 Loss in Weight
'Yc, Shrinkage = - -=- x 100
Fig. I shows the loss in weight of nylon-6 films
II
treated with 50% aqueous formic acid solution
for different durations. It is observed that signifi-
where I, is the length before the treatment; and ./2,
the length after the treatment. cant loss in weight occurs up to 4 h of treatment.
Thereafter, only a nominal loss in weight occurs.
2.5 X-ray Diffractometry
Similar results were obtained for lower concentra-
X-ray diffractograms of nylon-6 films were re- tions. After 8 h of treatment, no significant weight
corded using a General Electric XRD equipment. loss was found. This indicates saturation of disso-
The diffractograms were recorded in symmetrical lution process accompanying solvent action. All
reflection mode in 2 () range of 10° to 35°. Scann- further experiments were performed on samples
ing speed was l°/min. treated up to 8 h. Benzyl alcohol treatments did
a-y conversion was quantitatively estimated us- not cause noticeable change in weight.
ing the method proposed by Mitsuhashi and Kyo-
tani '4. The change in lateral order was followed 3.2 Density Measurements
by measuring the change in resolution of the The values of densities for different pretreated
peaks in the diffractograms using the method of nylon samples are given in Table 1. These values
Manjunath et al.I5 The crystallite sizes were calcu- were used to calculate the crystallinity index. The
lated using Scherrer's formula 10. For this purpose, changes in crystallinity index with respect to con-
the peaks were resolved after the normalization of centration of solution and duration of treatment
the profile. are depicted graphically in Figs 2 and 3 respect-
ively. It is seen that density increases linearly as
2.6 Infrared Spectroscopy
IR spectra of the film samples were recorded 8
using a Perkin-Elmer IR Spectrophotometer 7
(model 397). The IR crystallinity index was deter-
mined using absorbance measurements at 930 cm-I 0:6
~
and 1120 em -1, the latter being the internal
~5
standard 17. w
~4
z
...
Crystallinity index
A930
= --
;(;3
<J)
A1120 g2
where A is the absorbance defined by A= log loll
in which 10 is the incident intensity, and I, the
transmitted intensity at a given wavelength. o 2 4 6 8 10 12 t4 16
DURATION OF PRETREATMENT I h
2.7 Small Angle Light Scattering (SALS) Fig. 1 - Loss in weight of nylon-6 films pretreated witl: 5 (JO;;,
H v SALS patterns of control and treated films formic acid for different durations
94
BHAT et al: UNORIENTED NYLON -6 FILM
10 ( a) 1h ( a) 2 h
Table 1 - Density and crystallinity of nylon-o films pretreated 09
with formic acid and benzyl alcohol 08
07
Solvent Duration of Cone. of Density Crystallinity 06/~ _~
pretreat- solvent g! cc index 05_- .:
ment % 0-4
h 83
:x
~- J'2
1.139 0.40 Z ~J' ~
95
INDIAN 1. FIBRE TEXT. RES., SEPTEMBER 1990
--10'"
11001 ----30-,.
-_·-so·/.
....
>
in
z
w
•...
z
- L_----
..
~-:"~
.-
--
o~~~~--~
30 40 50 60
__70~~~~ __~
eo 90 100
BRAGG ANGLE,2e
SOLUBILITY PARAMETER
Fig. 5 - X-lay diffractograms of nylon-6 films pretreated with
formic acid solution for 8 h
Fig. 4 - Shrinkage of nylon-6 films pretreated with formic
acid of different concentrations
Table 2 - Lateral order (crystallinity) of nylon-6 films pre-
concentration, the shrinkage increases in a fairly treated with formic acid and benzyl alcohol on the basis of
linear manner. This can be understood in terms WAXD and IR spectroscopy
of changes in morphology taking place due to Solvent Duration of Cone. of Amount Crystallinity
swelling action. The mobility of chains increases pretreat- solvent of
ment % yform IR WAXD
and chain folding may take place, leading to sol- h %
vent-induced crystallization. This leads to contrac-
35.5 0.27 0.14
tion of chains and subsequent crystallization. The Formic acid 1 10 33.5 0.27 0.18
values of crystallinity indices obtained from the 1 30 29.1 0.54 0.20
measurement of density and X-ray diffraction are 1 50 0 0.66 0.49
in conformity with this mechanism. 8 10 32.5 0.39 0.20
8 30 28.9 0.63 0.24
8 50 0 0.90 0.50
3.4 X-ray Crystallinity and Crystallite Size
Fig. 5 shows the X-ray diffractograms for nyl- Benzyl 1 100 35.0 0.28 0.18
on-6 films treated with different concentrations of alcohol 8 100 34.5 0.53 0.19
formic acid. The three peaks occur at the Bragg
angles 20S, 21.r and 23.8° out of which the
peak at 21.r corresponds to the y-phase (I) and disappears and the peak corresponding to
the remaining two to the a-phase (I al and I a2)· (002)+(202) doublet shifts by about 1°. It has
These peaks correspond to the reflection from the been observed by previous workers'Y" that the
planes (200) and (002) + (202) corresponding to crystallization of nylon-6 proceeds at different
monoclinic a-form. The middle peak corresponds rates along the different crystallographic direc-
to (100)+(010) reflection from the hexagonal y- tions of the monoclinic a-unit cell. It was ob-
form. By using maxima and minima observed in served that as the crystallinity increases the half-
such diffractograms, the values for the lateral or- width of the (200) reflection (a, peak) reduces,
der were calculated using the method mentioned indicating increased crystallite size in the direction
in 2.6. The values (Table 2) show that the lateral normal to these planes (Table 3); as this direction
order and the amount of a-form increase as the corresponds to the direction of interchain hy-
concentration of formic acid is increased. The drogen bonds forming the n-crystallites it may be
corresponding values for benzyl alcohol show on- concluded that more and more molecular chains
ly slight increase in this parameter. From the dif- tend to align themselves with the crystallite as the
fractograms, it is observed that the relative crystallization proceeds. In other words, more and
changes take place in the several peaks. In parti- more hydrogen bonds are formed. Another inter-
cular, the reflection peak (100)+(010) at 21.r esting feature is that an increase in crystallite size
96
BHAT et al: UNORIENTEO NYLON-6 FILM
97
INDIAN J. FIBRE TEXT. RES., SEPTEMBER 1990
4 Conclusion
Solvent-induced crystallization of nylon-6 by
formic acid and benzyl alcohol results in the for-
mation of a-crystallites. Formic acid is more ac-
tive than benzyl alcohol in causing structural
changes. Solvent-induced crystallization is also ac-
companied by surface etching.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Mis Garware Nyl-
ons Ltd for supplying the nylon films. They are
also indebted to the Surface Science Laboratory,
University of Western Ontario, Canada, for per-
mitting the use of facilities. One of the authors
(NVB) is grateful to the Centre for Chemical Phy-
sics, University of Western Ontario, Canada, for
the award of a senior visiting fellowship.
References
I Jameel Hasan, Waldman Joshuja & Rebenfeld Ludwig. J
Appl Polym Sci. 26 (1981) 1795.
2 Weigmann Hans-Dietrich in Handbook of fibre science
and technology. Vol. 1 i Chemical processing offibres and
fabrics, fundamentals and preparation. Part Ai. edited by
Macachem Lewin & Stephen B Sello \ Marcel Dekker
Inc., New York) 1983,2-44.
11 Ribnick A S, Weigmann Hans-Dietrich & Rebenfeld L, 17 Wunderlich Bernhard, Macromolecular physics, Vol. 1
Text Res], 42 (1972) 720. (Academic Press Inc., London) 1973,418.
12 Jacobs M I,J Appl Polym Sci, 13 (1969) 1191. 18 Froeling P E, Koenhen D M, Bantjes A & Smoulders C
13 Moore W R & Sheldon R P, Polymer, 2 (1961) 315. A, Polymer, 17 (1976) 835.
19 Heuvel H M, Huisman R & Lind K C J B, ] Po/ym Sci,
14 Mitsuhashi S & Kyotani M, J Polym Sci, Part A-2, 10
Po/ym Phys Ed, 14 (1976) 921.
(1972) 1497.
20 Huisman R & Heuvel H M, J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed,
15 Manjunath B R, Venkatraman A & Stephen Thomas, ] 14(1976)941.
Appl Polym Sci, 17 (1973) 1091. 21 Samuels R J, Structured polymer properties (John Wiley &
16 Scherrer P, Gottinger Nachrichten, 2 (1918) 98. Sons, New York) 1974, 91.
99