National university open and distance Unad

School of education sciences Ecedu

Educational management
Unit 2 - Collaborative activity 2

HIGH SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MONITORING AND

EVALUATING THE QUALITY TEACHING

PRESENTED BY

EMILY KATERIN
CODE: 1006514600
ROSA ANGÉLICA GARCÍA

CODE: 1002799673

XIOMARA LORENA QUINTÍN

CODE: 1069738249
EDWARD ANDRÉS ADAIME MUÑOZ
CODE: 1117500665
TUTOR: CARLOS ALBERTO PENA
GROUP: 551030_11

UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA UNAD

BACHELOR'S DEGREE IN ENGLISH
JULY 03th – 2019
 National university open and distance Unad
School of education sciences Ecedu
Educational management
Unit 2 - Collaborative activity 2

Educational quality Assessment

Matrix for implementation

High School Development plan for monitoring and Evaluating the Quality
Teaching

Institution Public
DANE 2500234576893
location Kilometro 6 via the airport, Florencia city
Type of Students from 5 years of age to 17 years of age
population socioeconomic strata 2 and 3
Responsible
for the
development
plan Teacher:Emily Teacher: Xiomara Teacher: Angelica Teacher Sara Teacher Edward
Justification The new global scenarios directly affect all social organizations and force them to
undertake rapid transformations. Education is not alien to this phenomenon and, for
this reason, the education system faces important challenges to provide timely and
relevant responses to the new training needs of citizens for the 21st century.
How will
educational Consolidation of a quality assurance system aimed at providing the population with
quality be more and better educational opportunities.
evaluated?
Evaluation policy: this starts from the results of the different tests with the purpose of
making a diagnosis and then an action plan.

Plan development
1. Define the competences, they mark the way we want to go.
2. Articulate the educational project (PEI) with the quality standards, to meet these quality goals.
3. Study the different state tests from elementary to 11th grade
4. Diagnose the test result
5. Depending on the results of the institution, the team will be analyzed, and the teams will review
the individual contributions of managers and teachers.
6. The individual evaluation serves to review what has been or what should be the contribution,
to be in the dynamics and improve as a team.
7. The team must work around global objectives and individually. Each one must give his
contribution to those objectives.
 National university open and distance Unad
School of education sciences Ecedu
Educational management
Unit 2 - Collaborative activity 2
Organizational chart of the institutional
development plan

The 1. The manager will be in charge of administrative planning and delegating work
implementation. roles

2. The Academic Coordinator will be responsible for organizing the work

En esta parte teams.
Cada docente
Debe unirse
A un grupo y 3. Department of institutional educational project PEI: This will seek to
Comenzar a improve the areas of area and classroom, objectives or skills articulated with
Trabajar. quality standards.

4. Department of strategies: this will look for significant experiences in

teaching.

5. Evaluation Department: this will defend the ways of evaluating students.

6. Department of monitoring: This will be responsible for measuring progress

in the development plan

7. Department of statistics: This department will take care of measuring what

was also in the tests.

8. Department of tool and actions for the improvement of quality: In this you
must set monthly dates, or by academic periods to verify among all how the
plan goes.
 National university open and distance Unad
School of education sciences Ecedu
Educational management
Unit 2 - Collaborative activity 2

Team
Strategies

Verification of the plan

In this last part an evaluation is made only to the plan to verify how successful, what impact it produced,
what were its strengths and weaknesses so that in the next period these observations are adjusted and a
short term improvement is achieved, the idea is to go Improving little by little, because the quality of
teaching depends on the success of the development plan.

Web tool that

explains the LINK OF OUR DIGITAL TOOL
advantages of
our monitoring
plan and
evaluation of https://qualityteaching11.blogspot.com/
quality in
education

References 1.MEN Educational Management 2007:

https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-137440.html

2.MEN The way of educational management 2007:

https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-137437.html

3. Thomas Vásquez, Evaluation and monitoring 2008:

http://agenda21escolar.absostenible.es/index.php?id=87

4. Leadership and Strategic Management in Education .Autor: Bush, Tony, Coleman,

Marianne (200) Recovered by the Unad library.
 National university open and distance Unad
School of education sciences Ecedu
Educational management
Unit 2 - Collaborative activity 2

Referencias:

Bush, T., & Coleman, M. (2000). Leadership and Strategic Management in Education.

London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved

from http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?

direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=309760&lang=es&site=ehost-live

Postolache, F. (2011) New Technological Trends in Educational Management. Retrieved

from http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/794/721

Lopez, J. (2017)551030_One_Perspective_to_Understand_New_Trends. Retrieved

from http://hdl.handle.net/10596/12375

Söderström, T. (2010) The Transition from Distance to Online Education: Perspectives

from the Educational Management Horizon. Retrieved

from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ979610.pdf