Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Laws of Porperty PDF
Economic Laws of Porperty PDF
CHAPTER
this purpose, government policies of these countries want to assist by removing most of
Economic laws of.... land
I[~
the Jaws relating to excise and customs tax and render them free to operate in an area set
aside for the purpose. India drafted its Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Policy in 2000 with
and Property the main objective of providing an internationally competitive environment for exports.
The law was enacted in 2005 because mere gov~rnment policy without the backing of a
Jaw might not provide enough confidence to investors. A legal framework always ensures
stability, continui ty, and purpose.
Although industrial development is in the interest of public good, vast problems have
Principle: Domimum non potestesse in pedenti. cropped up in the acquisition of land for such development. In a highly populous country
A right to property cannot be in suspension. like India, land is a relatively scarce resource, which is more often than not owned by poor
farmers. Land being their only resource of sustenance, acquiring land for industries has
usually met with stiff resistance from them.
The Urban Land C eiling and Regulation Act, 1976 was enacted fo r the purpose
~
4 .----.,.._';!£q ...,,_ .. .A.- ,~t -..t¥ ,.,,_.,:_ _ 45
of overcoming the scarcity of land in the urban areas, for better planning, and fo r
( CHAPTER OUTLINE
_& ..,...._ discouraging undue sp eculation. Large expanses of land in the cities used to be in th e
W
I
Introduction and Interpretation
The Transfer of Property Act, I 882 hands of a few. Through this law, the government sought to acquire land in the interest
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005
Establishment of Special Economic • Land Acquisition Act, 1894 of the public good. H owever, the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act could not be
Zone • Stamp Act, 1899 put into practice by the states because of the extreme dissatisfaction of the land owners
Authorities and Officials • Registration Act, 1908
and the lack of urban planning by the government, thereby indicating the difficulty of
Facilities and Incentives Case Study: Public Cause vs
Property Laws Public Good land acquisition.
• Legal Luminary: Anand Sharma T itle of the property, whether land or any other such as stocks and shares, needs legal
certification. This is achieved through registration. The process of registration is finalized by
paying money to the registry and it is identified by government revenue stamps. The yaJue
16 of the stamp depends on the value of the property.
.1 INTRODUCTION AND INTERPRETATION For you as a manager, this chapter highlights the fact that land resource management
l ,_
must be considered with several allied laws in the context of all the laws of business. There
No person shall be deprived ofhis property save by authority oflaw. d. is no resource, property, or ownership upon the Earth as best as the land.
>< • · n of In ,a
_"""' 300A, ''""""'" 16.2 SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES ACT, 200S
:: Th, '<op, of ,h;, ,h, p" ' fndod,s sp,aaJ . <conom,c . 1aw,. Among
. td.
h ese,ssed
the because
Special
Economic Zones Act, 2005, also called the SEZ Act 200 , is speci f roperty an (1) A SEZ shall, on and from the appointed day, be deemed to be a territory outside the customs
'"°"•m,m. Es,.••«
5 .
of i,, rek»oc, '"'°"as, maru,g,, Yoo an, led thmogh t ' a ' .
ficaJJy 1scu
h Jfed laws O P
htt ind,peadeo.,,, fodia has grown econom,cally , n
dis oomid«
t depends
d
d
I§ territory ofIndia for the purposes of undertaking the authorized operations.
(2) A SEZ shall, with effect from such date as the central government may notify, be deemed to be
a port, inland container depot, land station, and land customsstations, as the case may be, under
<o be ooc of th, leading cmc,Wng economies of the world. Econonuc "' """ o
oo mdosmaJ
.
laod. ib"'
.
" '"
"°'""· '""' md,.oiaJ
.
. d elopmen
dewlopmcn, demand, not onlY lacg, ""
bo«a0cracy ,od less legal « qoiremenis, wluch ' Pm
I"' Co,.
d red and
f
Sec. 1 of the Customs Act, 1962.
- The SEZ Act, 2005, 53, 1 and 2
'>pfd Tod"" riali,a asid<
. h 1 . unhm e
hn,~ Ode of th, Au, <h, SEZ Aa 2005 deno«sa,ea, ononcs . ch"' Salient Features
. . f land set A SEZ may be established under this Act, either jointly or St'\ -erally by the central government,
fior tIie speuaJ
•·• 1purpose of
. . . ' . "'"' .so d up
B ·1 Ru . · ' · economic activity. The need of em ergrng econo
O
JOSJ"' state government, or any person for manufactm-e of goods or rendering sen ices or for both
~" , . "", od,a, Chm,, "d .>,"<h Africa is,o '" ,.sidead, qua<n poc< To ,chio'
rrooom,c Pmwc,, <hmogl, P,odo«ioo, '"de, and <ommen,, fairly onhindeccd. or as a free trade and warehousing zone [Sec• 3 (I)]·
......
9'JJ
'f;7 4~ 2 Lega!AspectsofBusiness
I§ future, to one or more other Jiving persons, or to ,mse , and one or more other livin enc or in
and 'to transfer property' is to perform such an act. 9 Persons, propcrty-
f//11stration · A Itransfers
fi h ·property
Ii of which he is the owner to Bin trust r·or A and h". .
1s mtend ed
- The Transfer of p
roperty S
, ec. s vifc successive. y or t cir. ves, and, after
. the death of the su!VI·vor, ,or
r the. eIdest son u f th c
In the forn·-fourth .-\mendment to the Constitution of India, properh, 1\·otcndcd marriage for hfc, and after l11s death for n"'s ·second son.
. The mtcrest
- so created 1.or
. . . -,~~ . . , , es not cxtcn d the whoIe of
to
the fundamental ri!!:hts. Apart from Article 300A, which expressly t· tachcd ~ e benefit of the eldest son does not take effect becausp "t do
1
_ "_ _. . . . _ . s ,Hes tha rolli til
depnn· a11othcr of his properues, the spmt of the enure Constnuuon of . ~ none c Ns remaining 111tercst 111 the property.
1nd1
· of dim11tY
· · of lifce and t he m · aJ1·ena bil1ty
· of one's prope a 1s b an
the proiecoon u • rty. T he T astd on sale of ~ovable p~operty - Sec. 54 Sale is a transfer of ownership in exchange
Property .-\ cl 1882. is an allied Act of the Contract Act, 1872, and the Sale of ransfer 0r for a price paid or promised or part-paid and part-promised. Such transfer, in the ca.~e of
J 930. Simi.Jar!); there are other Acts such as the Land Acquisition Act 1 . GoodsAq tangible immovable property, can be made only by a registered instrument. lt takes place
, 894, the R · ,
.-\cl 1908: Easements Act, l 882: the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation A egistration when the seller places the_buyer or such a person as he directs, in possession of the property.
1976
n-commended for repeal due to its non-performance); the Benami Tran c_t, (Which ~ A contract for the sale of immovable property is a contract that a sale of such property shall
. . sacuons p n1· .
.-\CL 1988: and the state-mse rent Acts. For you at this stage it is suffici· ro b1tion take place on terms settled between the parties. It does not, of itself, create any interest in,
' ent to kno
thesr .-\ct.s are important because whenever a law is enforced, its interlinki w_thatal) or charge on, such property.
i.~ logical. ng rela11onship
Mortgage- Sec. 58 A mortgage is the transfer of an interest in a specific immovable
property for the purpose of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced
16.7 THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 by means of loan , an existing or future debt, or the performance of an engagement that
may give rise to a pecuniary liability. The transferor is cailed a mortgagor, the transferee a
Living person The transfer of property is between living persons. Living person can be a
mortgagee, the principal money and interest of which payment is secured for the time being
compam: an a~sociation, or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, but nothin are called the mortgage money, and the instrument (if any) by which the transfer is effected
herein c~ntained shaUaffect any law for the time being in force relating to the transfer ~
0 is called a mortgage deed.
prope~ · w or br companies, associations, or bodies of individuals. Living person is a wider
term than natural human beings. It includes juristic persons such as companies and others Charges- Sec. 100 Where immovable property of one person is by act of parties or
such a, associations or body of indi\~duals irrespective of whether registered or not. operation of law made security for the payment of money to another and the transaction
does not amount to a mortgage, the latter person is said to have a charge on the property:
Transfer A process or an act by which something is made over to another. It does all the provisions herein before contained that apply to a simple mortgage shall, so far as
not. hm,·e,·er, mean that the making m·er of the thing should always be absolute. I may
may be, apply to such charge.
transfer my book to you for a dar I may also transfer it to you absolutely either by sale,
Leases of immovable property- Sec. 105 A lease of immovable property is a transfer
~ift. ur in exchange of your book. In either case, what is primarily essential is that I hare
of a right to enjoy property, made for a certain time, express or implied; or in perpetuity,
to hand rm:·r the book tu you. This act of handing over the book to you is the transfer
of the book. in consideration of a price paid or promised; or of money, a share of crops. seni ce, or any
other thing of value, to be rendered periodically or on specified occasions to the transferor
Conveyance of property Transfer of property has special technical meaning in the by the transferee, who accepts the transfer on such terms.
Transfer of Property Act. Only five com·eyances are considered transfer of property for the Exchanges- Sec. 118 When two persons mutually tra~sfer the ownership of one
::n_- Th_ree modes convey absolute title, for example, sale, gift, and exchange. Two convey thing for the ownership of another- neither thing nor both thmgs ~emg _money only- the
st
lurnted intere , for example, mortgage and lease. Transfer can be in the present or future, · · all d h A ti·ansfier of properrv in compleoon of an exchange can
but the transferor and the transferee mu~t be a living person. The only exception is Sec. 13 transacnon 1s c e an exc ange. ·,
of the Transfer of Propert>' Act. be made only in a manner provided for the transfer of such a property by sale.
Gifts- Sec. 122 Gift is the transfer of certain existing mo,·able or immovable property
Exception to trans£. O f fit · ·d · b · one person cailed the donor, to another,
f er property according to Sec. 13- Transfer for bene
o unborn person Wh - d fi r made voluntarily and without cons1 , eraoon,behalf) of 1hr donee.
· Acceptance must be made
1ht· bencIi I r,f a person not 111
·ere, on
·st. •a transfer of property,' an interest therein is create
· 0t
called the donee, and accepted b) or on
• eXJ cnce at the date of the transfer, subject to a prior rnteres
re ;28 Legal Aspects ofBusiness
Economic La ws Of Land and Property ~
42~
Fina] dedaration · Sec. 4 (1) After receipt of objections, the concerned authoritJ 16.9 STAMP ACT, 1899
,hali conqdcr those objections, and if found unsatisfactory, a final declaration rejecting Lht Objective T he government wants to charge for its various sen;ccs. starting from postal
'. !aims inll be i,,ued. According to Sec. 6 of the amended Act, the final declaration shaUIx delivery to transfer of property. Cirizens too have come to accept something stamped or sealed
th th
l%u_ed b~· ,, au oiit)· ll'ithin a period of one year from the da te of issuance of preliminary as trustworthy. People trust documents on stamp paper similar to how they have confidence
nouficauon According to S 6(2' Of' • · J ted in cu rrency coins and bills or notes. There are Yarious st:1mps for Yarious sen-ices. such as
undrr the Act . , de· I·ec.• · J I11c Act before the amendment, the umc·snpufa he
· for final
sha re b rokers propert\' deals and revenue-related deals..\11 these are imtruments of revenue
I. .
pre rmrnarv .
noufication The Ii I d wa~
c arauon I three
. years from the da te of publicanon t ° ' . ,
· · na ec ara11on has to be published as required. collection to the goYernment.
~·~
~ 430 Lega/Aspectsof Business
• c◄ the law r
Basis or
.·- 1- ·-din1hc,011110 s,
Tax 1, t ,,c
Tl , Constimtion of India has provided provisio ~
.
1t . . ns •or J, .
f ' tamps 0 11 mstrume nts rccordrng the tra n . . cvy,n. ,_
. .·
,. d to be convcme nt for coll cc lio n and supervisi
sact,on · ·" "'Ii,
s. I his, · 6 1
contd
abfe1 :..:.,_- . .
Economic Laws of Land and Property 431
~,.
. •~1
. · has b,·en ,oun
of taxanon1 · . ·ith tax on
.
transaCllons.
.
Article 246
_
a nd the
· on. l'h
sc , c Stamp ·
'Otii,
r__. __ Used m insurance departments to authenticate
. ti I - arue dea1mg " · V( nth s h \ insurance policies
is Ia sea1 , .' . ·d , the lcoislati,·e power to levy stamp dutfrs. J\nicl ' ' •C Cduie I
. \\1th reg,11 IO ,,. . . . cs 265 •rt .11 Stamp duty in respect of import paid to India
re c, an . h· iTgarding the d1stnbu11o n of n ·, ·c nut·. Th,• p • 268 a foreign bl . .
•)69 c) arc rde,·ant marn . . . rocccds . , llj
- . . . financial ,·ea r shall be assign ed to th e state. Undn ~ . _ · of st,.. fer Used m transaction of shares by financial institutions
5haretran1~s~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - T . - : - ~ - - - - - - - - = - - -- - - - - - ,
I,
dur..- k \lablc Ill an~ . ' . . , . . . '"HlJcJc 2 ·••p
t ·ip duuc, . _ a,_ a1.,l ,iicntioned m a hst are levied • by_ till umon, but Und er A .46,suc'" •sroker's stam p Used in respect of transaction through brokers - ·i
, an . ·I11. 11 1h )" are levied collects a nd re tams the proceeds. As th rticJe ilia NotafY___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _-'--------------------'1
Used at notarization of documents l I.I
1hr statr 111 " c e . . c rcvcn ·
sramp dun. 1.s assign _. ed to the state m which . they arc_ collected, ea ch sta tl' govcr Ue fr%
r,
· "b d. b . I thar stamps purchased m the sta te a lone shou ld lie used r. . 11111 cn1 h, , . A art from the above m entioned stamps used in the government dcpanments, embossing a nd frankin,\
prcscn e ~ ru e or 1ns1ru 1 J,ov. p ps arc also in vogue. It 1s both effiocnt and convcmmt rather than ha,ing docum,·nts p asted and 0
execu1ed 111 11.
. . Ille% of these stam ·
d with seals separately. 'I
S d ty n s,arnpe
tamp u o negotiable iostnunents . Tax is levie d in the form of Stanip . re I
f tl·ons in instruments such as bill of exchange, letter of credit debe
o 1ransar . ,
10 Pe<1
nture 5r '·
of insurance, agreement or memorandum of agreement, lease cum sale, sale of p; P01t1 All stamps arc available in suitable and varied denominations. Each state of India has regulation.,
deposit of deeds. conveyance, and so on as defined in Schedule 2 of the Starn °Pell). regarding st.amp duty. The states also have the power to incrca.<;c or decrease the stamp duty
prO\ided in the Stamp Act, all dunes · wit . h wh 1c
' h a ny 111st1
. -umcn ts a re chargeabJ
p Act. --\s
be paid and such payment shall be m . d'ICate d on sueh m
. strument by means of • e sh.Ji
. · by the government. An ms'.1 . . .ument to be duly stamped 1should
rnpre55ed 16.10 REGISTRATION ACT, 1908
stamps or ~tamps issued ht
stan1ped w11h a stamp not only of the amount reqmred by the law but also in the Inspector of Registration-0) The State Government shall appoint an officer to be the Inspector
prescribed by the law. manner
I§ General of Registration for the territories subject to such Government. Provided that the State
Government may, instead of making such appointment, direct that all or any of the powers and
duties hereinafter conferred and imposed upon the Inspector Generalshall be exercisedand performed
Paying for stamps Stamps hm·e rnrious uses (Table 16.1 ). The stamp duty parabl
by such officer or officers, and within such local limits, as the State Government appoints in this behalf.
on an instrument may also be paid in cash by challan in a ba nking treasury or a tre~u:
counter signed by an officer empowered by state government or by a demand draft or ~- - The Registration Act, 1908, Sec. 3
pay order drawn on a branch of any scheduled bank. Instruments may be stamped Iii~
an adhesi\·c stamp. Any d ocument requiring legitimacy in matters of property, sale, brokering, and the like needs to
be registered with the central or state governments. There are various authorities who perform
Table 16. 1 Types of stamps and thei this task, such as the registrar or sub-registrar or anyone authorized officially (Case I 6.2 ).
I Stamp Compulsory registration of doCUJDents- Sec. 17 U nder this section, there are
Revenue Use a numbe r o f documen ts or instruments enumerated that are required to be compulsorily
Court fee registere d:
Judicial stamp (a) Instruments by which an immovable property is gifted.
(b) Instruments that create, declare, assign limit, or extinguish any right, title, or interest- vested
Non-judicial stamps Used for transaction with the judiciary
or contingent- in any immovable property, exceeding n 00 in value. However. if these
Used since 1928. Used for contracts, agreement sales, a re testam entary instruments. for example, wills and codicils, then these are not coveITd.
Fiscal (adhesive) deed, wills, lease, rent, and so on
(c) Instrumen ts th at acknowledge receipt/ payment of any consideration on account of any
Used in non-judicial documents for financial creation, declaration, assignment, limitation, or extinction of any right. title, o r intt'rest
transactions
are covered. The testa mentary instruments a re not covered.
(d) Leases of immovable properties that are made annually exceeding a term of one year
Conld
- -
"Th, o, ,r
-,omps
- ;, oh;q,;,ow; d yo, ge, <oofowd ahoo, ;,s ose, ,J,e ;m•g~ wdl d ea, yo,s do,b" S. or reseIVing a yearly rent.
h11p:/ /\nn,.ksphc.org/starnpit/ info (3 O ctober 20 11 ). (e) Instruments transferring or assigning any decree or order of a mun or any award if it
c reates, d eclares, assigns, limits, or extinguishes any right_ titk. or interest- vested o r
15':'
32 Legal Aspects ofBusiness
Economic Laws of Land and Property 433 QJ 1f11if t
nv~1t.11
PETTTIONER:
Thiruvengada Pillai vs RESPONDENT: Navaneethamm
a 1and Ot'-
••ers•
contingent . in any · h 1mm0\ ,tblc ~
d propc1ty' exi·teding ' 1(J[J .11 1 ,·a1U<' , f"r ,·xampk. cn11rt "'t 1,
DAn: OF JUDGEMENT: 19 February 2008 ord crs dca
. I mg wtt _mcrg!'r,
.' emt-r"ns
" · , .,tn.angemcnts, an<l , r, r,n Sec, Y I! '3'J l r,f tlw
ompa nies Act, 19::>6);
. . again t,·stamrntary in,., tru Ill( .IW, ,<llf'
. cxctnplt' d .
C
Specific perfonnance: validity of stamp paper, opinion of experts 5 oc uments cnntammg. contra!'ts to. transfer for l'<>n ,1c .· In,,uon
. · o f any 1111m", ·abl,· propcnv
Fr...rrs:
St mp Act l 899; the Indian Stamp Rules, 1925; Sec. 45 of the lndi eEc._S4 of the 1 . (f) D
in pa rt performanc<· of a !'ontract !Src :>3A of the Tr·ti1';l-rpr l () 1- p rop('nv A{ t. I n 82 h.IC h,
a an V1denc 11d1,, L r ) ) • \ \'
Plaintiff-Appellant alleged that the first defendant agreed to sell . e Act, 181 ave•brcn cxccut . . cdnn oraftn 2"1-S!'l11emb'Lr 2001 , mu~t br 1Tgt~t!'rl'd. · , It ha, bi>t·n lurthcr
. d . . suit Pr0 l h
agreement and received some amount as a vance. Plaintiff issued . Perty h.. rovided that ii suC'h docum,·111> an· not n:o-i,tcrcd
.,. , tl1 <. n t ht-y !-)I1aII nnt Ilt.1\ T a n , f> fl-e t t
· h b I D ,
the sale deed and receive t e a ance amount. e,endant denied th a notice uy
to exec •n P
for the purposes of S,T. 53/\ of' tlH' T ramfer of Propert) Art , 1882. '
executed the sale deed in favour of a second defendant. Plaintiff fil de agreement IJte
e a suit i al)j Non-compulsory regiStr ation of docwnents The foll,l\\ing need not I,1· compulv,rily
performance. Defendant contended that the sale agreement put fo h or sPecific
was forged and concocted. Trial court dismissed the suit on the grou rtd by the Plaintiff registered:
. n that th (a) Instruments relat ing to shan:s in a company whrrtc all the share, of the cr,mpan~ 1 onw,t
forth by plaintiff was false. H1_gh court allowed the second appeal filed b e salePot
defendant restoring the dec1s1on of the tnal court. Hence, the prese t Ythe letO!Jd of immovabk property
n appeal
Is the agreement of sale executed on two stamp papers pure'- · (b) Some court decrees
11ased on d'" (c) Any endorsement on a m urtgagr deed acknowlr·dging thr payment of the whok o r part
dates and more than six months before the date of execution not v . h,ere11
. 'fi e d in . th e d 1sputed 7
first appellate court 1ust1 . comparing ' thumb imp ahd . · Was the of the m ortgage money and any other receipt for the payment of tht' monry due under
. . . . ress,on . h
admitted thumb 1mpress1on and recording a findin g a bout the authen .. Wit the a m ortgage whe n the receipt dues not extinguish mortgage
thumb impression, without the benefit of any opinion of an expertl t1eity of lhe
0 Penalties C hapter XI\· discusses the penalties fix incom·ctly endorsing, cop)ing, translatim;. or
court err in reversing the judgement of the first appellate court in the s· 1d the h·19h
econd ap registering document,, faJse statements, delivering fal-;c copil's of documents, false impersonation.
Held, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, nowhere prescribes any expiry date f pe,11
stamp paper. No ,mpe · d'
1ment ,,or a stamp paper purchased more tha or. use of,• and abe011ent. The registering offict>r may conduct undC'r thl' Indian Penal Code, 1860.
. .
before the proposed date of execution being used fo r the document.
n six month5 A The aboYe issu(' is merely a pointer. You arc recomm<'nded to read thi.,
/ ...,. MANAGER'S TAKEAWAY Act carefully because all your acti,itics concerning va1ious instrumt>nt,
JUDGEMENT. Appeal dismissed
Adocument is a of contract, sale, brokering, and so on will have a day-to-day occupation
RwoN: The trial court had analyzed the evidence properly and had dismissed the suit by giving legal instrument that with registration processes of onl' kind or the other. You arc further
cogent reasons. The first appellate court reversed it by wrongly placing onus on the a manager should advised to read and understand the Indian Easement, Act, 1882. which
defendants. Its observation that when the execution of an unregistered document put assiduously
• guard.
d d .
concerns 1t,ell . with
. leave and · licenses.
· · dispcnsable acu,
an m · 1C\·
· o f the
forth by the plaintiff was denied by the defendants, it was for the defendants to establish OnIy a s1gne , seaIe , . . . .
and stamped document company management. The Rent Act, which 1s speofic to each st.ate. 1s
that the document was forged or concocted, is not sound proposition. The first appellate
court proceeded on the basis that it is for the party who asserts something to prove that is a legal instrument. another important law you should know for the lx-nefit of your company
thing; and as the defendants alleged that the agreement was forged, it was for them to
prove it. But the first appellate court lost sight of the fact that the party who propounds
the document will have to prove it. In this case, plaintiffs came to court alleging that the
first defendant had executed a Page 0954 agreement of sale in favour. The first defendant SUMMARY
having denied it, the burden was on the plaintiff to prove that the first defendant had Stamp Act, 1899
There are several laws of property and land . Registration Act, 1908
executed the agreement and not on the first defendant to disprove it. The issues also
The SEZ Act, 2005 suddenly seemed to have Land acquisition is a difficult issue as it is tied with
placed the burden on the plaintiff to prove the document to be true. No doubt, the
increased the public consciousness dramatically people's emotions and livelihoods such as those of
plaintiff attempted to discharge his burden by examining himself as also the scribe and
against acquisition of large sizes of lands for quick farmers.The transfer of property ensures the correct
one of the attesting witnesses. However, the various circumstances enumerated by the
industrialization. manner of conveyance of rights and entitlements
trial court and high court referred to earlier, when taken together, rightly create a doubt
th In the context of SEZ, the following allied laws thereof. Registration of property ensures legal title.
abou_t e authenticity of the agreement and dislodge the effect of the evidence. The ensure justice and safeguard the rights of citizens, This title is endorsed through documents that are
deos,on of th e high court, reversing the decision of the first appe llate court, does not call stamped, sealed, and signed. Stamp duty is a means
associations, and the corporations:
for interference. There is no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed.
----- SEZ Act, 2005 for the government to levy tax for the services it
·Toiruvengada Pillai vs Nava th ·//WWW• Transfer of Property Act, 1882 renders.
lawinhk·com/ (3 0 ctober 201neee
OJ.
ammal and others, in the Supreme Court of India; see also http. Land Acquisition Act, 1894
~
•.r:.:::J/11' 434 LegoIAspectsofBusiness
Economic Laws of Land and Property 435~
EXERCISES
~
. . rca for sening up Units fi,r artiVJtirs, being counsel for tlw ptlll1onrr 1ha1 1·xrru11un of ~lul·,and so
rcss111g a . .
H;,, Th, la,,d ""l";,;,;.,, fhC P'-o re of goods, or rcndcnng service;, on is in contravention of th e provision, "f S<'c. G of Ihr-
Sitar.un got a notice from the government S.1)~ng ,ufaclU . 1.
Per the law of SEZ by niaking p e ratrirc1 ,, dir n131 -xclusively for trac lllg or ware huming State Act of 2003 should 11o1 l,c ac tepted b,· the court.
that land under a cc11ain sUIWY number that . area c . ..
g 1 1,c or T he non-proccssmg area, for arUVJUcs other Alier pointing out to 1hr court that 1hr , uhstr~tum of the
happens to be his " ·ould be acquired for the overnment or to the Board of Aiiroposa110 th, U~t-ii
(iii) M o han wrnt to the sub-registrar PrO\'ai. . 'It urp0srs, •fied under clause (a) ur clause (b). writ petition is the alleged viuldti,,n of till' State Act of
highwa~ project. He filed a suit claiming that he P hose speo
. . . and s1 1han 1 . rovisions of tlus Art shall haw eflrct notwitlt~tanding 2003, it was argued that then· arc no far wal avPrnH'n ls
has no knowledge of any p ublic notification. H e his brother m a sale dcrd 1,1thout h· . gntd~,. :,I,(I)'fhcP
. sistent tl1erew1'ti1containe
. d .111 any othrrlaw for or grounds relating 10 violation of th,· Ct·ntral Art of
contended that if there " ·ere such a notification, p~wer of attorney. In fact, he aclcda11ngani• .
as if •Pilr~ ,u,)1hing1ncon. in force or in any .mstnnnc-nt having dlrct by 2005, and as the rhall rnge 10 the allotment of J.,nd 1,1
his brother. ht ' <J tin,c being .
he would han: filed objections w1der Sec. 5A of the law other than this Act. respond!'nt number 5 pron-eds on a fundamental le~al
Hint: Impersonation is a criniinat offrn . ,;r1ur of an)' ' misconception, thr pc·tition should 1,e di, missed.
the :\cL The gO\-ernment contended that it has the
l)enahze
· d under Sre 62 u f thr Stanip Ace, hr •'"• ~ and His Cause
right to dispense with Sec. 5A as per Sec. l 7 (.J.). P utioner Adjudicator of Cause and the Good
(iv) Is SEZ a short-lrnn law? It docs no, c1, 1908 e La.I Sharma was a municipal employee. After his
Hint: Yes. under the said section the government h · Chief JusticeJM Panchal and J ustice ~I Rafiq of the High
cannot dispen..<1' the right of the people for objections. same p lace among laws o f propert a"t ii·! ·\ [ohan
. he dedicated h,msr
. If to publ.1c cause: fighting
reurcrnen 1' Court of Rajasthan heard tlw argument, c,f the counsel,
. d grab. He raised the .issue through a Puhlir
.
r.-
ll .-\ company acquired land in SEZ as per the law. . . .
of Acqu1s1t10n o 1· p ropen y and Tray as, Iha, nsl 1an from either side, elaborating their respecU\·e pusiuon,. They
Property. ns,er of ag,31 Litigation against the land alluncd to developers
H oMwr. afier some rime they pressurized the Interest came to the follO\,ing conclusion:
through UH' SEZ Act, 2003, in the State uf Rajasthan. Thr Thr record thus does nut indicate that the land was
adjutant owners to sell their properties to the (v) Narrate the \'arious uses and instances of not only sold cheap, but was also sold 10 people
compam·. Iand waS alloucd in a surreptitious or clandestine manner. :\or does
Stamp Duty Act for a private limited corn~ , · teresLs which did not speak of any public good ,t,
\Vil1l tn ' the record show that there is any sram as 1s sought to be
per the stated objective of the SEZ. made out by the petitioner. Ii would not be out of place to
Under Sec. 6 (I) of the State Act of 2003, the State of state that the so-called scam is a figment of the imagination
•
-
Take up a summer internship at a SEZ of your
-
DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL EDGE
-·-----------
-~~~:J
When back in your training institutes, rnale
Rajasthan has to identify and notify the area to be developed
as a special economic zone whereas under Ser. 6 of the
said Act, the state government has bren entrusted "' th the
of the petitioner, which has no factual basis at all. & noticed
earlier, srveral decisions taken under the Central Act of 2005
are no1 challenged by 1hc petitioner al all. Therrfore. the
interest duty to select a developer for the purpose of development court "iU have to proceed on the footing that those decisions
p resentations foc using o n th e legal probltlll;
Encourage others to do the samf'. of the zone. and under Sec. 6 (3) of the said Act, the state arc ,·alid. Once thr decisions taken under the Central Art
confronted at the zone.
At the end of the internship collate your reports. government is required to prescribe the procedure to select of 2005 arc tn·ated 10 be valid, thi, roun finds that nothing
the developer. remains to be done in the instant public litigation The
The land involved was a whopping 13,000 bighas for petition will haw to he carried to its logical conclusion by
- -
projects such as IT City, Bio Tech City, and Knowledge dismissing the same.
FURTHER READIN<i
Web resources
- _, '~
.--~~
-: -:~
• Registration Act, 1908 http: / / www.indiacode.co.in.
City. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was
signed between the government and the developer
Mahindra and Mahindra, the renowned industrial group.
The Moral of the Case
Although prudence may convince the fairness of a caLLse,
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005. justice demands fidelity to the application of the law.
• Latest Case Law o n Land Acquisition Act. 189-1 The charge of the Public Interest Litigation petitioner is
Transfer of Propeny Act. 1882. that the land, which is commercially highly valuable, was Discussion Q.uestions
Land Acquisition Act. 1894. http://revenueh aryana.gov.in/ html/am_rules/ I. What are main issues in this c='
transferred to the developer for free. He pleaded with
Stamp Act. 1899. land¾ 20acquesition¾20 1894.pd( 2. What is the relationship of the disputin~ parties'
the High Court of Rajasthan to set aside the ~!oC. The
SEZ http:/ /www.sezindia.nic.in. 3. How do you evaluate a land resource?
petitioner's commercial estimate of the land was Rupers
4. What do you understand by the term land use?
one crore per bigha. Hr pleaded stating that 1his is a
5. Howwould you evaluate the judgemenl of the Rajasthan
...CASE STUDY ~, land grab in the garb of SEZ, depri,, ng the state of its
- ..
PL'BLIC CAUSE VS PUBLIC GOOD High Court?
---