You are on page 1of 6

Review

Cannabinoid receptors in osteoporosis and osteoporotic


pain: a narrative update of review
Jing Wanga , Hong-xia Lub and Jing Wangc
a
Department of Osteoporosis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China , bDepartment of
Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China and cDepartment of Nephrology, The
Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

Keywords Abstract
cannabinoid receptors; glial cells;
osteoporosis; pain; TRPV1 Objective Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease with decreased bone mass and alter-
ation in microarchitecture of bone tissue, and these changes put patients in risk
Correspondence of bone fracture. As a common symptom of osteoporosis and complication of
Jing Wang, Department of Osteoporosis,
osteoporotic fracture, chronic pain is a headache for clinicians. Nonsteroidal
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen
University, No. 118 LongJing Second Road,
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective COX-2 inhibitors and opioid drugs
Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong can temporarily reduce osteoporotic pain but have relevant side effects, such as
Province, China. addiction, tolerability and safety. The review summarized the recent advance-
E-mail: wangjing1mail@163.com ments in the study of CB receptors in osteoporosis and osteoporotic pain and
related mechanisms.
Received February 27, 2019 Key findings Recent studies indicated the two nociceptive receptors, cannabi-
Accepted June 15, 2019
noid receptor (CB) and transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1)
doi: 10.1111/jphp.13135
channel, are co-expressed in bone cells and play important role in the metabo-
lism of bone cells, suggesting that dualtargeting these 2 receptors/channel may
provide a novel approach for osteoporotic pain. In addition, both CB receptor
and TRPV1 channel are found to be expressed in the glial cells which play vital
role in mediating inflammation, chronic pain and metabolism of bone cells, sug-
gesting a role of glial cells inosteoporotic pain.
Summary Multiple-targeting against glial cells, CB receptors and TRPV1 channel
may be one effective therapeutic strategy for osteoporotic pain in the future, fol-
lowing the elucidation of the complicated mechanism.

treatment can effectively prevent the further development


Introduction
of osteoporosis and occurrence of osteoporotic fracture
As one common disorder in the ageing era, particularly for which is an important cause of morbidity and mortal-
menopausal women, osteoporosis is a worldwide disease ity.[3,4] However, due to the complex of pathologies of
caused by the reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) osteoporosis, it is still not very clear of its mechanism.
and alteration of bone architecture which results in the Recent studies have shown that the central nervous sys-
increase of bone fragility and fracture risk. Because of the tem (CNS), including neurons and glial cells, plays an
complicated causes of osteoporosis such as age, sex, post- important role in regulating bone metabolism and there-
menopausal status, rheumatoid arthritis, vitamin D defi- fore in the pathology of osteoporosis through cannabinoid
ciency, low calcium intake, hyperkyphosis, alcohol abuse receptors (CB1 and CB2)[5,6] which are involved in pain
and long-term of certain therapies, etc, the management of modulation.[7,8] In addition, the transient receptor poten-
osteoporosis is still a headache problem, and controversial tial vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) which is increased in dorsal
effects are encountered although there are a variety of root ganglia innervating femur of rats with osteoporosis[9]
advancements.[1,2] also modulates the activities of osteoblasts[10–12] and
Because osteoporosis is a systemic disorder affecting all pain[13,14] through the interaction with glial cells and CB
bones of the body, it has different demonstrations in clinic. receptors.[13] These results imply that the CB and TRPV1
Amongst, osteoporotic pain is the most prevalent morbid- receptors may play important role in the pathology of
ity and greatly affects the life quality of patients.[3] As osteoporosis and osteoporotic pain, following more and
osteoporotic pain is an early sign of osteoporosis, correct more studies are performed in this field (Table 1).

© 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, ** (2019), pp. **–** 1
Cannabinoid receptor and osteoporotic pain Jing Wang et al.

Table 1 The key references and findings about the cannabinoid sys-
Cannabinoid and osteoporosis tem in osteoporotic pain
Cannabis is widely used for recreation with a long history, Reference
and cannabinoids are proposed to play a role in bone number First author (year) Key findings
homoeostasis. Although a national survey of people at age [34]
Bellini G (2017) TPRV1 channel and CB2
of 20–59 years failed to find association between self-re- receptor show opposite effect
ported cannabis use and bone mineral density (BMD) of in modulating osteoclasts
hip or spine,[15] more and more data support the idea that [46]
Franks LN (2018) Inhibition of CB2 receptor with
the endocannabinoid (EC) system which is composed of inverse agonist prevented
cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, arachi- inflammation and
donoylethanolamine, 2-arachidonoylglycerol and cannabi- osteoclastogenesis
[13]
Giordano C (2012) TRPV1 channel antagonist and
nol), receptors (CB1 and CB2) and related synthetic and
CB1 receptor agonist inhibit
catalytic enzymes (Figure 1), plays an important roles in neuropathic pain
osteoporosis. For example, endocannabinoids anandamide [10]
He LH (2017) TRPV1 channel facilitates
(AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) are detected in fracture via promotion of
the skeleton while CB1 and CB2 receptors are expressed in osteoblast activity.
[40]
bone cells, suggesting that the EC system is involved in the Huo W (2018) Microglia is involved in bone
pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Consistently, pharmacologi- cancer pain
[14,31]
Kanaya K (2016) TRPV1 channel is involved in
cal and genetic inactivation of EC system could inhibit
osteoporotic pain via osteoclast
bone absorption/loss and increase bone mass in adult mice. activity.
In addition, the CB1 and CB2 receptors have a protective [16,28,38]
Lozano-Ondoua AN Activation of CB2 receptor
effect against age-dependent bone loss in the ageing mice (2010, 2013), Lu C attenuates breast cancer-
regardless of gender.[16] One study indicated that activation (2017) induced bone pain and bone
of CB1 receptor also promotes osteoporosis induced by loss
[37]
corticosteroid in young rats but prevents osteoporosis in Miost J (2018) Activation of CB1and blockade
of TRPV1 receptor attenuate
aged rats.[17] The expression of CB2 receptor is down-regu-
osteoarthritis
lated in osteoporotic patients while over-expression of CB2 [30]
Naito Y (2017) Osteoporotic pain involves
receptors in osteoporotic bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) TRPV1 activation and CGRP
increases the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), phos- expression to affect bone
phorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase resorption
[11]
(MAPK), expression of osteogenic genes and deposition of Reni C (2016) TRPV1 channel is involved in
mineralized extracellular matrix.[18] Activation of CB2 diabetes-induced osteoporotic
pathology
receptor is found to increase the activity of ALP, expression [17]
Samir SM (2014) CB1 receptor is involved in
of osteogenic genes and calcium deposition in extracellular osteoporosis
matrix. On the contrary, knockdown of CB2 receptor by [9]
Yoshino K (2014) Osteoporosis increases TRPV1
siRNA shows opposite effects and reduces the phosphoryla- activities in DRG neurons
tion of p38 MAPK. In addition, the CB2 receptor in the innervating femur
bone marrow of samples is lower in osteoporotic patients
when compared with that of healthy people.[19] Knockout
of CB1 and CB2 receptor gene can enhance the bone mass CB2 receptor produces high-turnover osteoporosis in aged
of mice at birth and adulthood, and prevent bone loss mice which show relative uncoupling of bone resorption
induced by ovariectomy through inhibiting the activities of from bone formation and reduced capacity to form bone
osteoclast. The age-related increase of bone mass in CB1 nodules in vitro, and impairs PTH-induced ALP activity.
and CB2 receptors double knockout mice is due to the On the contrary, activation of CB2 receptor promotes bone
overweighting of osteoclast inhibition against reduction of formation of nodule in wild-type osteoblasts but not in
bone formation, which is in contrast with reports showing CB2 knockout osteoblasts, cell migration and ERK phos-
higher bone loss in single inactivation of CB1 or CB2 recep- phorylation in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells. Action of
tor, suggesting an overlapping but non-redundant roles in CB2 receptor also prevents bone loss induced by ovariec-
regulating osteoclast and osteoblast activities by CB1 and tomy in wild-type mice by stimulating bone formation but
CB2 receptors, and also indicating that combined inhibi- not in ovariectomized CB2 knockout mice.[21] These results
tion of CB1 and CB2 receptors should be considered in further indicated that CB receptors are involved in
treating age-related bone loss, whereas blockade of individ- osteopathogenesis but may have different roles which
ual receptors may be detrimental.[20] Similarly, knockout of remain to be further studied.

2 © 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, ** (2019), pp. **–**
Jing Wang et al. Cannabinoid receptor and osteoporotic pain

(a) (b)
HO H
THC N
O
AEA

Fatty acid amide


OH
hydrolase
H 2N
O

(c) AA
OH
Extracellular

OH OH OH

Monoacylglycerol
ygy
lipase
O
OH
CB1 Intracellular 2-AG
2 AG O
CB2 OH
O

Figure 1 The EC system. Structure of natural cannabinoid THC (a), endocannabinoid AEA, AA, 2-AG and related enzymes (FAAH, MGL) (b), and
structures of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 (c).

and bone marrow cells, while blockade of TRPV1 signifi-


Cannabinoids and osteoporotic pain cantly inhibits the bone metabolism in ovariectomized
Chronic pain is one of the most important complications of mice,[14] suggesting TRPV1 channel plays important role in
osteoporosis and is a challenging management for clini- osteoporosis by promoting bone loss induced by ovariec-
cians.[22,23] In addition to the direct effects of resulting frac- tomy (OVX). TRPV1 knockout reduces the number of
ture which can cause acute and chronic nociceptive and osteoclasts, impairs the osteoclast formation and resorption
neuropathic pain,[24] pain is also a common feature in osteo- activity, decreases the oscillation frequency and peak con-
porosis without fracture.[3] It has been reported that post- centration of cytoplasmic calcium in osteoclast precur-
menopausal women have significant higher prevalence of low sors.[10] Consistently, ovariectomy of mice produces
back pain[25] and there is an association of repetitive pain with osteoporosis and mechanical hyperalgesia, and up-regulates
regional migratory osteoporosis (RMO).[26] Central sensitiza- the expression of TRPV1 channel and calcitonin gene-re-
tion has been suggested to play an important role in the devel- lated peptide (CGRP) in dorsal root ganglion DRG) neu-
opment and maintenance of chronic pain related with rons.[30] It is found that the TRPV1-positive neurons are
osteoporotic fracture which is difficult for treatment and usu- increased in DRG innervating osteoporotic femur of
ally requires a comprehensive strategy including a large spec- mice[9] while the DRG neurons are sensory neurons playing
trum of drugs and non-pharmacological treatments.[23,27] critical role in pain transmission. Inhibition of TRPV1
The EC system has been implicated in pain modula- channel can attenuate pain behaviours in mice with osteo-
tion[7,8] and may be involved in the osteoporotic pain as porosis induced by OVX.[31] These results suggest TPRV1
the EC system is involved in the pathology of osteoporosis channel may play a vital role in menopausal osteoporosis
as mentioned above. In fact, it is found that activation of and related pain.
CB2 receptor by agonists JWH015 could via cytokine/che- As TRPV1 channel and CB1/CB2 receptors are found to
mokine suppression reduce breast cancer-induced bone be co-expressed in human osteoclast and mesenchymal
loss and severe bone pain induced by implanting the spon- stem cells, selective TRPV1 channel agonist resiniferatoxin
taneously occurring murine mammary cell line (66.1) into increased the activity of osteoclast, suggesting that TRPV1
the femur intramedullary space.[28] channel and CB1/2 receptors might crosstalk in modulating
the homoeostasis of bone mineralization and resorption by
different actions of anandamide.[32,33] Recently, it is found
Mechanism of CB in osteoporotic
that the TRPV1 channel and CB1/2 receptors oppositely
pain
modulate the activity of human osteoblast in culture, that
is, CB2 receptor promoting osteogenesis whereas TRPV1
Interaction of CB receptors with TRPV1
channel inhibiting osteogenesis in glucocorticoid- or OVX-
channel
induced bone mass loss.[34,35] Consistently, osteoclasts from
As a Ca2+ permeable cation channel and pro-nociceptive patients with osteosarcoma shows significant increase of
channel,[29] TRPV1 is found to be expressed in bone tissue pro-osteoporotic tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase

© 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, ** (2019), pp. **–** 3
Cannabinoid receptor and osteoporotic pain Jing Wang et al.

(TRAP) and decrease of CB2 receptor when compared to


osteoclasts from healthy donors. The immunomodulator Glia
mifamurtide reduces the expression of TRAP, PKCbeta2
Nerve injury
and TRPV1, and increases CB2 receptor in osteoclasts from Inflammaon
healthy donors,[36] implying there is an interaction between
CB receptors and TRPV1 channel in modulating bone Cancer
metabolism. In a study of osteoarthritis of which the main TRPV1
1 channel
symptom is chronic pain, dual-acting component targeting
CB receptors and TRPV1 channel demonstrated strong jus-
tification,[37] further implying an interaction in modulating
osteoporotic pain between CB receptors and TRPV1 chan- CB R t rs
Receptor
nel of which remains to be further studied.

Other mechanisms Osteoblast Osteoclast


In a variety of studies of pain induced by bone cancer
which is one common cause of osteoporosis by itself or
chemotherapy,[16,28,36] the expression of G-protein-coupled Osteoporosis
receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) in spinal cord is down-regulated
and the down-regulation of GRK2 is inhibited by CB2
receptor agonist but potentiated by CB2 receptor antago- n
Pain
nist.[38] This study implies that CB2 receptor may affect the
activities of GRK2. Activation of CB2 receptor also Figure 2 The mechanism of CB receptors in osteoporotic pain.
increases the activities of PI3K/Akt, which is enhanced by
receptor activator of NFjB ligand and parathyroid hor-
mone.[39] In the development of bone cancer pain, it is cannabidiol display increases of serum osteocalcin and
found that the microglial cells in spinal cord display bone mineral density of tibiae and femurs, and decreases
increase of classically activated state and decrease of alter- of serum collagen type I cross-linked C-telopeptide.[22]
natively activated state; and these changes are accompanied The usage of cannabinoid to treat rats suffering spinal
with over-production of IL-1b and inhibition of IL-10.[40] cord injury which commonly induces chronic pain but
On the other feature, bone fracture could activate glial cells effective treatment is not identified also increases bone
in spinal cord.[41] These results imply that glial cells which volume, trabecular thickness and trabecular number, and
play important in cannabinoid-mediated pain[7,8] may also decreases trabecular separation in proximal tibiae. These
play role in osteoporotic pain through inflammation which effects may be related with the up-regulation of mRNAs
is also a common reason for osteoporosis and osteoporotic of alkaline phosphatise, osteoprotegerin, wnt3a, Lrp5 and
pain.[42] In addition, it is reported that bone cells also ctnnb1, and down-regulation of mRNAs of receptor acti-
express leptin and leptin receptor which is modulated by vator of NF-kappaB ligand and tartrate-resistant acid
glucocorticord and dexamethasone.[43] All these studies phosphatase in femurs.[45]
suggest that the involvement of the nervous system includ- In addition, the first-generation ridaifen compound
ing glial cells may be another mechanism for cannabinoid RID-B can bind to and/or inactivate CB1 and/or CB2
to modulate osteoporosis and osteoporotic pain, which receptors, demonstrating anti-inflammatory and anti-os-
remains to be further studied. teoclastogenic properties.[46] These results imply that
Rubus coreanus Miquel (RCM) is found to inhibit the cannabinoids play a complicated role in cancer-related
osteolysis of osteoclasts and the dysplastic progress in osteoporosis and pain through complicated mechanisms.
prostate gland, and to increase the expressions of CB
receptors and osteoprotegerin.[44] These results suggest
Conclusion
that cannabinoid receptor-related up-regulation of
osteoblastogenesis contributes to the anti-osteoporotic There are more and more studies[32,37] verified that both
effect of RCM in prostatic hyperplasia by simultaneously CB receptors and TRPV1 channel are involved in the meta-
altering the activation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. bolism of bone cells and the pathology of osteoporosis
They also imply that treatment with RCM may benefit which is an common complication of many pathological
these patients with osteoporosis due to prostatic disease. conditions (such as chemotherapy, cancer and menopause)
It is found that rats treated with the non-psycoactive and cause of osteoporotic pain (Table 1). The interaction

4 © 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, ** (2019), pp. **–**
Jing Wang et al. Cannabinoid receptor and osteoporotic pain

between these two pain-related receptors raises more and


more attentions for the elucidation of their mechanism in Declarations
modulating osteoporosis and osteoporotic pain,[33]
through complicated mechanisms including inflammation, Conflict of interest
cancer and nerve injury to affect osteoblasts and osteoclasts The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest
(Figure 2). Targeting again CB receptors and TRPV1 chan- to disclose.
nel has been a novel therapeutic approach against chronic
pain,[37,47] and may be a strategy for osteoporosis and
osteoporotic pain in the future. In addition, following the Acknowledgements
elucidation of glial cells in osteoporosis and osteoporotic The study was supported by the National Natural Science
pain through inflammation,[40–42] it is possible to design Foundation of China (NSFC#81371230) and Committee of
multi-target drugs against glia, CB receptors and TRPV1 Science and Technology Innovation of Shenzhen
channel for osteoporosis and osteoporotic pain.[48] (JCYJ201504021520056).

References 10. He LH, et al. TRPV1 deletion 18. Wang B, et al. Restoration of osteo-
impaired fracture healing and inhib- genic differentiation by overexpression
1. Akkawi I, Zmerly H. Osteoporosis: cur- ited osteoclast and osteoblast differen- of cannabinoid receptor 2 in bone
rent concepts. Joints 2018; 6: 122–127. tiation. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 42385. marrow mesenchymal stem cells iso-
2. Skjodt MK, et al. Side effects of drugs 11. Reni C, et al. Diabetes stimulates lated from osteoporotic patients. Exp
for osteoporosis and metastatic bone osteoclastogenesis by acidosis-induced Ther Med 2018a; 15: 357–364.
disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 85: activation of transient receptor poten- 19. Sun YX, et al. Activation of cannabi-
1063–1071. tial cation channels. Sci Rep 2016; 6: noid receptor 2 enhances osteogenic
3. Paolucci T, et al. Management of 30639. differentiation of bone marrow
chronic pain in osteoporosis: chal- 12. Rossi F, et al. The genetic ablation or derived mesenchymal stem cells.
lenges and solutions. J Pain Res 2016; pharmacological inhibition of TRPV1 Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 874982.
9: 177–186. signalling is beneficial for the restora- 20. Sophocleous A, et al. Combined defi-
4. Curry SJ, et al. Screening for osteo- tion of quiescent osteoclast activity in ciency of the Cnr1 and Cnr2 receptors
porosis to prevent fractures: us pre- ovariectomized mice. Br J Pharmacol protects against age-related bone loss
ventive services task force 2014; 171: 2621–2630. by osteoclast inhibition. Aging Cell
recommendation statement. JAMA 13. Giordano C, et al. TRPV1-dependent 2017; 16: 1051–1061.
2018; 319: 2521–2531. and -independent alterations in the 21. Sophocleous A, et al. The type 2
5. Idris AI. Cannabinoid receptors as tar- limbic cortex of neuropathic mice: cannabinoid receptor regulates bone
get for treatment of osteoporosis: a impact on glial caspases and pain per- mass and ovariectomy-induced bone
tale of two therapies. Curr Neurophar- ception. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 2495– loss by affecting osteoblast differentia-
macol 2010; 8: 243–253. 2518. tion and bone formation. Endocrinol-
6. Idris AI, et al. Cannabinoid receptor 14. Kanaya K, et al. TRPV1, ASICs and ogy 2011; 152: 2141–2149.
type 1 protects against age-related P2X2/3 expressed in bone cells simul- 22. Bryce TN. Opioids should not be pre-
osteoporosis by regulating osteoblast taneously regulate bone metabolic scribed for chronic pain after spinal
and adipocyte differentiation in mar- markers in ovariectomized mice. J cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases
row stromal cells. Cell Metab 2009; 10: Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2016b; 2018; 4: 66.
139–147. 16: 145–151. 23. Mattia C, et al. Bone pain mechanism
7. Wang J. Glial endocannabinoid system 15. Bourne D, et al. Cannabis use and in osteoporosis: a narrative review.
in pain modulation. Int J Neurosci bone mineral density: NHANES 2007– Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2016;
2018; 129: 94–100. 2010. Arch Osteoporos 2017; 12: 29. 13: 97–100.
8. Wang S, et al. 2-arachidonyl glycerol 16. Lozano-Ondoua AN, et al. A cannabi- 24. Vellucci R, et al. Understanding osteo-
modulates astrocytic glutamine syn- noid 2 receptor agonist attenuates porotic pain and its pharmacological
thetase via p38 and ERK1/2 pathways. bone cancer-induced pain and bone treatment. Osteoporos Int 2018a; 29:
J Neuroinflammation 2018b; 15: 220. loss. Life Sci 2010; 86: 646–653. 1477–1491.
9. Yoshino K, et al. Increase of TRPV1- 17. Samir SM, Malek HA. Effect of 25. Zaman M, et al. Role of dual energy
immunoreactivity in dorsal root gan- cannabinoid receptors 1 modulation X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan in
glia neurons innervating the femur in on osteoporosis in a rat model of dif- the diagnosis of chronic low back pain
a rat model of osteoporosis. Yonsei ferent ages. J Physiol Pharmacol 2014; – A Prospective Randomized Con-
Med J 2014; 55: 1600–1605. 65: 687–694. trolled Study in Osteoporotic Patients

© 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, ** (2019), pp. **–** 5
Cannabinoid receptor and osteoporotic pain Jing Wang et al.

Hospitalized in a Tertiary Care Insti- receptors. Pharmacol Res 2015; 102: nociceptive sensitization after fracture.
tute. Maedica (Buchar) 2018; 13: 120– 254–263. Neuroscience 2015; 310: 73–90.
124. 34. Bellini G, et al. PKCbetaII-mediated 42. Li Y, Wang L. Changes in inflamma-
26. Unoki E, et al. Repeated low back cross-talk of TRPV1/CB2 modulates tory factors in patients with osteo-
pain caused by regional migratory the glucocorticoid-induced osteoclast porotic vertebral compression fracture
osteoporosis of the sacroiliac joint. J overactivity. Pharmacol Res 2017b; and influences of rehabilitation train-
Orthop Case Rep 2018; 8: 54–56. 115: 267–274. ing on postoperative functional recov-
27. Vellucci R, et al. Understanding osteo- 35. Rossi F, et al. CB(2) and TRPV(1) ery and inflammation. J Musculoskelet
porotic pain and its pharmacological receptors oppositely modulate in vitro Neuronal Interact 2018; 18: 272–279.
treatment: supplementary presenta- human osteoblast activity. Pharmacol 43. Chen SM, et al. Dexamethasone
tion. Osteoporos Int 2018b; 29: 2153– Res 2015; 99: 194–201. down-regulates osteocalcin in bone
2154. 36. Bellini G, et al. The role of mifamur- cells through leptin pathway. Int J
28. Lozano-Ondoua AN, et al. Disease tide in chemotherapy-induced osteo- Med Sci 2018; 15: 507–516.
modification of breast cancer-induced porosis of children with osteosarcoma. 44. Lim HK, et al. Stimulation of
bone remodeling by cannabinoid 2 Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2017a; 17: cannabinoid receptors by using Rubus
receptor agonists. J Bone Miner Res 650–656. coreanus extracts to control osteo-
2013; 28: 92–107. 37. Mlost J, et al. Molecular understanding porosis in aged male rats. Aging Male
29. Jardin I, et al. TRPs in pain sensation. of the activation of CB1 and blockade of 2015; 18: 124–132.
Front Physiol 2017; 8: 392. TRPV1 receptors: implications for novel 45. Li D, et al. Cannabidiol administra-
30. Naito Y, et al. Alendronate inhibits treatment strategies in osteoarthritis. Int tion reduces sublesional cancellous
hyperalgesia and suppresses neuropep- J Mol Sci 2018; 19: E342. bone loss in rats with severe spinal
tide markers of pain in a mouse 38. Lu C, et al. A single intrathecal or cord injury. Eur J Pharmacol 2017;
model of osteoporosis. J Orthop Sci intraperitoneal injection of CB2 recep- 809: 13–19.
2017; 22: 771–777. tor agonist attenuates bone cancer 46. Franks LN, et al. The tamoxifen
31. Kanaya K, et al. Acid-sensing ion pain and induces a time-dependent derivative ridaifen-B is a high affinity
channel 3 or P2X2/3 is involved in modification of GRK2. Cell Mol Neu- selective CB2 receptor inverse agonist
the pain-like behavior under a high robiol 2017; 37: 101–109. exhibiting anti-inflammatory and
bone turnover state in ovariectomized 39. Sophocleous A, et al. Bone cell-au- anti-osteoclastogenic effects. Toxicol
mice. J Orthop Res 2016a; 34: 566– tonomous contribution of type 2 Appl Pharmacol 2018; 353: 31–42.
573. cannabinoid receptor to breast cancer- 47. Malek N, Starowicz K. Dual-acting
32. Rossi F, et al. The endovanilloid/en- induced osteolysis. J Biol Chem 2015; compounds targeting endocannabi-
docannabinoid system in human 290: 22049–22060. noid and endovanilloid systems-a
osteoclasts: possible involvement in 40. Huo W, et al. Dehydrocorydaline novel treatment option for chronic
bone formation and resorption. Bone attenuates bone cancer pain by shift- pain management. Front Pharmacol
2009; 44: 476–484. ing microglial M1/M2 polarization 2016; 7: 257.
33. Zador F, Wollemann M. Receptome: toward the M2 phenotype. Mol Pain 48. Dvoracsko S, et al. The design of mul-
interactions between three pain-re- 2018; 14: 1744806918781733. titarget ligands for chronic and neuro-
lated receptors or the "Triumvirate" of 41. Li WW, et al. Substance P spinal sig- pathic pain. Future Med Chem 2015;
cannabinoid, opioid and TRPV1 naling induces glial activation and 7: 2469–2483.

6 © 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, ** (2019), pp. **–**

You might also like