Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TEAM: EUROPE
Sushi Assignment
SUBMITTED BY:
THOMAS PAUL PALAKUNNEL – N01255049
SONALI SHENDE – N01269535
NAVNEET KHARE – N01257530
KRUTART SHAH – N01270325
.HARJOT – N01270014
SILKY SHARMA – N01269724
VANIT KAUR – N01270693
ANTONY JOSEPH - N01270078
HINAL MAISURIA – N01266686
Business Case #1: How Sushi Went Global. Foreign Policy Nov. 19, 2009
http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/19/how-sushi-went-global/
1
contact and often conflict with customers, governments, regulators and environmentalists
around the world.
Fishers in New England, whose traditional livelihood depended on the unfamiliar tastes
and distant markets, turned to Japan’s ability to transform tuna from trash into treasure around
the world. For fishers all over the world, the meaning of tuna — the equation of tuna with
Japanese identity — is simple: Tuna is nothing less than the samurai fish!
5. Identify the institutions that were important in the spread of sushi and explain briefly.
Ladies’ Home Journal:
2
In 1929, the Ladies’ Home Journal introduced Japanese cooking to North American
women, but discreetly skirted the subject of raw fish and omitted any recipes using the delicate
and raw tuna fish which is sliced wafer thin and served iced with attractive garnishes which
might not sound as entirely delicious as they were in reality.
Holiday and Sunset Magazines:
By 1960s, articles on sushi began to show up in lifestyle magazines like Holiday and
Sunset. But the recipes they suggested were canapés like cooked shrimp on caraway rye bread,
rather than raw fish on rice.
New York Times and kosher sushi bar:
A decade later, however, sushi was growing in popularity throughout North America,
turning into a sign of class and educational standing. In 1972, the New York Times covered the
opening of a sushi bar in the elite sanctum of New York’s Harvard Club. Esquire explained the
fare in an article titled "Wake up Little Sushi!" Restaurant reviewers guided readers to
Manhattan’s sushi scene, including innovators like Shalom Sushi, a kosher sushi bar in SoHo.
Business Case#2 Google in Asia: Seeking Success. Economist Feb. 26, 2009.p.71
http://www.economist.com/node/13185891
3
So, basically, Naver is Yahoo! Answers, Blogger, YouTube and Google's paid search
combined. Searchers look for necessary information by browsing different types of Naver's
search results, such as the Q &A database, News search, Blog search, etc.
7. What is the relevance of understanding cultures in the success of a business such as illustrated
by an internet businesses like Naver? Please explain briefly.
Every society has its own “cultural themes,” which have a substantial impact on how
that culture does business. In order to mark the presence in that country or region for any
business, it is critical to understand and research on the culture of that region. In the Computer
world, still users are adapted to their cultural background in regards to the kind of navigational
support because of their work efficiency, trust, user satisfaction.
South Korea has long been one of the most advanced web markets, with high internet
penetration and fast connectivity. For Example - Naver’s knowledge in, which give the new
ways in the history of Korea’s search market because not only did Naver’s “Knowledge Search”
algorithm is in the local Korean Language, which helps Naver deliver more relevant results than
Google, since Korean syntax is quite different from the English language. It enables people to
ask questions, the answers to which are served up from a database provided by other users. If
an answer is incomplete or inaccurate, it can be easily changed, Wikipedia-style, for the benefit
of others who ask the same question in future. According to Naver business mutual
understanding creates a new culture, it offers spaces where users can communicate to create
and share information it include information necessary for daily life, individual know-how, and
expert knowledge.
Mr. Chae, CEO of Naver says he plans to launch several more culturally specific search
engines, such as “Naver California”, “Naver Korean-American” or “Naver Chinese-American”.
That would be attacking Google on its home turf.
4
start-ups specializing in sectors of AI, Internet of Things and virtual reality, which is why global
tech giants are eyeing the market
9. Can the VRIO framework be used to explain the advantage of Naver over Google? Please
explain briefly.
Yes, The VRIO framework can be used to explain the advantage of Naver over Google.
The VRIO framework stands for: Value, Rarity, Imitability and organization.
Value:
The number of indexed sites per user in Naver is less than the number of indexed sites
per user in Google. But the quality of those sites is better than those in Google. Naver prefers to
have less stuff in its index, but to make sure that stuff is real. That's why it gives priority to paid
listing, directory submissions, user generated content, Web 2.0 properties, etc.
Rarity:
Having rarity in a firm can lead to competitive advantage. One important thing to bear
on mind is that Naver's search algorithm is built around the Korean language, which helps
Naver deliver more relevant results than Google, since Korean syntax is quite different from
that of the English language.
Imitability:
Firms with valuable and rare resources, which are hard to imitate by other firms, can
gain the first-mover advantages in the market and can hence gain competitive advantage.
The Services provided by Naver can of course be imitated but the cost of imitation would be
high for the imitating company. Also other factors such as search algorithm in Korean language
and the Korean webmasters blocking google for many websites.
References:
Bestor, Theodore c. (November, 2009). How Sushi Went Global. Retrieved from
http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/19/how-sushi-went-global/
Seongnam City and SHANGHAI. (February, 2009). Google in Asia Seeking success. Retrieved from
https://www.economist.com/business/2009/02/26/seeking-success
KIM JEE-HEE. (June, 2017). Naver will buy Xerox Research Centre Europe. Retrieved from
http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=3035156
Krush, Alesia. Google Vs. Naver: Why Can’t Google Dominate Search in Korea?, Retrieved from
https://www.link-assistant.com/blog/google-vs-naver-why-cant-google-dominate-search-in-korea/
Bonfils, Michael. (May, 2011). Search Marketing Guide to Naver, Korea’s Most Popular Search
Engine Retrieved from https://searchenginewatch.com/sew/opinion/2070244/search-marketing-
guide-naver-koreas-popular-search-engine