Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Operating with two clamping cylinders (Fig. 10) gives the best
forward motion, but unfortunately also the greatest clamping
distance (a) between the cylinders and the beating elements.
a
Fig. 14 – Securing band (a / b), bars and spikes of the inclined lattice
passing the latter, and because in the upper region of the lattice
there is a counter-rotating roller (Fig. 44), also clothed with 1.3.2.4. Rotating devices
spikes and located fairly close to the lattice. This roller strips the 1.3.2.4.1. Rollers with teeth (blades) or spikes
large material lumps from the lattice. The counter-operation of
the two systems of spikes causes the tufts to be plucked apart. Flat, oval or round bars are welded, riveted or screwed to
The intensity of the opening action is dependent upon: closed cylinders. In another system flat bars are secured
• the distance between the devices; with the narrow side facing in the direction of rotation.
• the speed ratios;
The rollers are therefore called spiked rollers (Fig. 16).
Various spacings of the striker elements are used. These
devices are incorporated mainly in modern horizontal
cleaners, chute feeds, mixing bale openers, step clean-
ers, etc., which are located from the start to the middle
of the blowroom line.
At the start of the line, the spacing of the striker ele-
ments on the roller is greater; finer spacings are used in
the middle (to the end) of the line. The rollers rotate at
speeds in the range of 600 - 1 000 rpm.
Fig. 24 – Rollers with pinned bars (Kirschner rollers) Fig. 25 – Two-part grid
1.3.3.2. The elements of the grid 1.3.3.3. Waste collecting chambers under the grid
Impurities and fibers fall through the grid gaps and accumulate
in large quantities in the chamber under the grid. Waste used
to be periodically removed manually, but pneumatic removal
systems are used today. As far as the cleaning effect is con-
cerned, modern waste chambers are passive elements, without
influence on the operation. In older designs they sometimes
participated actively, and afforded the possibility of exerting
a significant influence on events by permittingsome of the
transport air for forwarding the tufts (the so-called secondary
air) to enter through the waste chamber and the grid. Such sys-
tems enabled the interaction of airflow and beating power to
b a
be exploited. Heavy particles could drop out, against the air-
flow through the grid gaps, because of their high ratio of mass
to volume. However, fibers were taken up again with the air-
flow because of their low ratio of mass to volume. Today, this
principle cannot be exploited because of the small size of the
foreign matter, which would now be carried back along with
c d the fibers. Accordingly, a so-called dead chamber is now used;
none of the transport air now passes through the grid gaps.
a
3
a
2
b
1
b
0
0 1 2 3 4
c
B
A [%]
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
4.5 8.5 12.5
B [s]
Fig. 29 – Influence of feed pedal distance (s; B, mm) on waste elimination (A, %)
1.3.5. Alternative cleaning possibilities
An alternative to the commonly used mechanical clean- ing was the airflow cleaner from the former Platt Company.
The ‘Air-stream-cleaner’ comprises two parts, a Kirschner roller as opening assembly (and pre-cleaner) and the airstream cleaner itself,
as shown diagrammatically in Fig. 33.
The cotton passes from the Kirschner roller (in front of
A) into duct A. The transporting air is subjected first to acceleration due to convergence of the duct bore, and to an additional
airstream created by fan (V).
A
C
In region C, the whole airstream undergoes a sharp diversion (of more than 90°) towards E.
While the relatively light cotton tufts can follow the change of direction, the heavier foreign particles fly through an opening in the
duct, beyond region C, into the waste chamber.
This is an extremely gentle cleaning technique, but it requires foreign matter significantly less able to float than the fibers, i.e. it must
be substantially heavier than the fibers.
Unfortunately, this is no longer true for all cotton variet- ies, and therefore this good cleaning idea is not appli- cable today.
1.3.6. General factors influencing opening and cleaning
Degree of opening, degree of cleaning and fiber loss are pri- marily dependent upon, and can therefore be influenced by:
• the type of opening device;
• speed of the opening device;
• degree of penetration into the material;
• type of feed;
• spacing of the feed from the opening device;
• type of grid;
• area of the grid surface;
• grid settings (airflow through the grid);
• condition of pre-opening;
• thickness of the feed web;
• material throughput;
• position of the machine in the machine sequence.