Running Head: METAPHORS

Discussion of Statement

[Name of the Student]

[Name of the Institute]

[Date]
 Metaphors 2

Table of Contents

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Discussion ....................................................................................................................................... 3
How common individual should treat certain politics and their words? ........................................ 5
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 8
References ..................................................................................................................................... 10
 Metaphors 3

Discussion of Statement

Introduction

The Metaphors lie at heart of the linguistic itself. It has been argued that metaphor can be

included in the thought and the daily jargon both. In the cognitive linguistic view, the conceptual Commented [QA1]: Inappropriate sentence

metaphors builds not only the communication, but also way we reflect and perform. The

Metaphor plays a very important role in the human understanding, thought or even creating our Commented [QA2]: Kindly use third person in academic
context
psychological, social, and cultural reality, because it is used effortlessly by the ordinary

individual in the daily life. The attempt to understand the metaphor means understanding what

type of world we reside in. As a fundamental reasoning structure, the metaphor aids us to learn a Commented [QA3]: Invalid argument

comparatively conclusive point by means of more solid concept. The area of dispute is

metaphorically active for all kinds of “conflict and human struggle” (Sageman, 2017). The “war Commented [QA4]: 50 inverted commas in a 2000 words
assignment is a bit too much
metaphors” have developed a vital area of English linguistic for more than thousands of the

years, hence additional terms for war such as “besiege, fight for, win out, attack, battle and fend

off” are extensively utilised by normal individual in daily linguistic.

Discussion

Currently, thousands of the military jargons are implemented to the non-military

circumstances in daily writing or speech, which has proved to a normal process, hence individual

are highly likeable to draw on the experiences in one particular area of the life to comprehend the

experiences in another. For instance, we have the war standings to elaborate love in daily

linguistic. He won her heart through marriage. She is overwhelmed by the suitors. His teacher Commented [QA5]: Is this an example of metaphor?

won out but she did fight for him. Most of the English speakers keep in to consideration this way
 Metaphors 4

of communicating regarding the marriage or the love as the natural and the normal for daily

determination and they eventually do not consider that they are using the metaphors (Yaneva,

2017). Hence the war conditions are so persistently used in daily linguistic, it is commendable to

consider the outcomes that why “war metaphors” are so extensively accepted by the individual in

daily linguistic and in what areas are war conditions frequently metaphorically implemented as

well as how the war metaphors act in these multiple sectors to aid the individuals to understand

conclusive domains of target.

Rather than emphasising on the academic research, the discussion focuses on portraying Commented [QA6]: What? Is this not an academic
research?
the cases to prove the point. The concepts revolving this statement will be portrayed in this

discussion. In the war and the politics of any type for linguistic strategies is the sub-ordinate to

the reality and facts hence the term politics cannot be considered as “philology”, it is rather

considered as the biology, the politicians must be capable to manipulate and confront power Commented [QA7]: Invalid argument

midpoints for their own will and desire (O'Reilly, 2016). Secondly, both politics and sports are

constantly about hostilities, as dissimilar benefits clash, though, within politics the negotiation is

possible. Thirdly, the war essentially sub-ordinate to diplomacy and politics (which is

fundamentally politics). Fourthly, the sports is considered as the replica of war which is

somewhat politics. Commented [QA8]: Inappropriate sentence and phrases

It is due to the fact that several benefits collide in this perspective, however, in a very Commented [QA9]: In what perspective

harmless and “parody” manner. The term “politics - comes from Greece – politikos” which has

significance which relates to an area population. According to Aristotle, “Human beings are by Commented [QA10]: This is again inappropriate and is
best to be revised
nature political animals, who naturally want to live together” (O'Reilly, 2016). This indicates that

the politics is considered as the art or the science of individuals who are residing together. In the

political system, multiple benefits of individual come across, when careers, wealth and existence
 Metaphors 5

are at risk. Therefore, it is quite obvious that in the political system, individuals are not arbitrated

on their disputes, speeches and the linguistic devices they consider, actual acts and the benefits

are the initial steps that the politicians consider.

“Politics is the art of the possible, said Otto Von Bismarck”. Certainly, the politics

initiated when the procedure of bargaining amongst several group of individual (or even the

nations) initiate. Preferably, the politicians must find the procedure to attain the circumstances

when his political party will get everything it requires whilst reimbursing nothing in return.

Though, as we know this circumstance cannot be attained, the politicians must pursue for

compromise which is acceptable (Pedullà, 2018). Amongst the group with multiple interests,

there can be a negotiation, but not an expressive contact. Considering this, linguistic of politics

and war must sustain this wish to discover most beneficial negotiation - in the politics everything

must be automatically re-entered in own support. The major purpose in this scenario is not to

manipulate the mind-set of enemy, instead to demonstrate own reinforce moral and strength of

own side, best case is making a propaganda.

How common individual should treat certain politics and their words?

The politician is an individual whose actions are firmly controlled. Such individual is in a

thin path of the change amongst the government, profit gaining organisations and the lives of

individual. In the meantime, the life of a politician is associated with the socialising

characteristics of an individual, who consistently mentions to “oneself with a politician’s words”

regarding, demanding to state oneself at own expenditure (Preece, 2016). Therefore, the

individual must consider the political individual as their “public servants” whom they might

support or abide in the war for power. This is general philosophy; though, every politician must
 Metaphors 6

appropriately govern the position of the opponent within the politics, based by individual’s

allowed capability and the extent of sub-ordination to the determination of another. Therefore, it

must be concluded that every term of the “metaphor, analogy, politician” or any other linguistic

device consider common perspective which is to increase own power and influence (Preece,

2016).

Though, the politicians must never lie because the enemies can expose them as the liar,

therefore doubting individual, she/he must put the accents which are correct is considered as the

main area of utilising the linguistic device amongst the political individuals. Therefore, the

politician is an individual that manipulates a person who are above the individuals rank. The

political actors tries to use a person who are influential, smarter, up to date and wealthier than

others. However, such manipulation cannot be completed with the assistance of the “metaphors”

and linguistic device. However, they can be adapted to assure powerful individual concerning

particular actions which can be helpful. “War is the continuation of politics by other means, said

Carl von Clausewitz”, which demonstrated that the politics involves conflict, and war is

considered as the last solution in this context (Gupta, et al., 2017).

For instance, particular individual, with the assistance of domestic government is pushed

out from individuals abode in the heart of the city, whilst the “Construction Company” gives

considerable reimbursement. This individual though, does not desire to reside own property -

which might proceed to the legal pressure, then to the terrorisation and even murder. In any of

the civilised country the individual can go to court of law and, highly likeable to attain own

rights at the particular stage of legal pressure? In the “international law”, there is no particular

place to defend one’s own fundamental rights (Gupta, et al., 2017). “There is a court in The

Hague, the UN, but they are actually secondary, powerless, and for the most part insidiously
 Metaphors 7

disguised institutions”. Consequently, government can beat, scare, or to murder (which means to

declare war) with another state.

This is quite normal even for a lot of the civilised country, the instances are not very far

to seek. Krauzowitz suggested that negotiations were the basis of military action, but such a

massacre was only a specific period of negotiation (Gupta, et al., 2017). In fact, there is no war

just because of conflict and political negotiation. For example, Germany decided in 1890 to

eliminate Heligoland from England and succeeded without a war. What can change possible

military conflicts? Due to the German victory, there is no equivalent of reports and cases

worldwide, and some (other) regional changes have been corrected. On the other hand, politics

around the world is a “war”, which is mainly a Cold War or a zero-sum war (guarantees and their

silent implementation or tacit resignation) (Gupta, et al., 2017).

Regardless of whether war is fought, there is a political, political and social perspective

that is far from being military. Today, conflicts occur in different regions, so the military aspect

is irrelevant. One model is the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is about financial damages,

worries, political pioneers and personal fears. In this case, the rhetorical instrument can be used

to deceive the average person, but different negotiation / conflict debates are inspired by reality.

Instead, rhetoric was used to transmit them to recruits, and they needed service and murder so

that their country could win the war for a complete change. These days it was used for similar

reasons to create a “general feeling”. A model can be described as “active nuclear war between

the United States and Europe”. In view of the mass propaganda struggles, the nuclear power

plant was completely destroyed amongst westerners. For this reason, conventional hot rolling

trains, especially with respect to nuclear waste, are almost unsafe (Pedullà, 2018).
 Metaphors 8

From a security point of view, the collapse of a flood dam can have many desperate

consequences caused by nuclear power plants. The nuclear power plant is generally not identical

to all other power plants. This is because the possible consequences of a limit extension do not Commented [QA11]: How does it relate to the metaphor,
war or sports?
end. Under normal nuclear energy conditions in the advanced post-mechanical world, each state

needs a “mind” to improve it. The “brain” provides development, but the elements can be

grouped in other created countries. But after the betrayal of nuclear energy, each state needs

“heart” and “oil” (in addition to the waste of combustible gas and varied vitality). Until then,

non-state oil (and gasoline) was in a murky area of free competition between organisations

around the world. Asset management is becoming the most important element of global policy.

The United States is trying to control oil-rich areas with the help of military influence (this is

now obvious to most ordinary people) (Preece, 2016). For the creation of neoconservatives. -

Colonial control in areas rich in oil (more precise than ever). It is strongly recommended that

political activities at the district, district and country level result from conflicts between

individuals. Most average people are more aware of average personal data and agree with that

statement.

Conclusion

In summary, it tends to suggest that the scope of the statements showed that the policy

addressed the conflict and supported the divergent views of the Creator on this point. Unlike

politics, sports issues are not that important. If anyone lose the ground, fans get sick and the door

opens less to invite athletes, but these are wars or “political wars”. The loss of military losses can

lead to financial and financial difficulties. Similarly, unlike politics in sport, an agreement cannot

be reached. There is only one champion. Because the outcome of the game does not completely
 Metaphors 9

affect people’s lives, the sport has shifted to key areas that have been reinforced by the media,

rather than personally interacting with government officials. Enjoy sports For example, the

behaviour of football fans has become as important as any attempt or purpose that is the main

cause of collective pain in urban Europe. At the same time, the patriotism of football fans is an

incredible board game that is underestimated in personal interviews between European countries.
 Metaphors 10

References

Gupta, S., Katsarska, M., Spyros, T.A. and Hajimichael, M., 2017. Usurping Suicide: The

Political Resonances of Individual Deaths. Zed Books Ltd..

O'Reilly, C.C., 2016. The Irish language in Northern Ireland: The politics of culture and identity.

Springer.

Pedullà, G., 2018. Machiavelli in Tumult: The Discourses on Livy and the Origins of Political

Conflictualism. Cambridge University Press.

Preece, J., 2016. The life and work of Gunter Grass: literature, history, politics. Springer.

Sageman, M., 2017. Turning to political violence: The emergence of terrorism. University of

Pennsylvania press.

Shapiro, M.J., 2018. The Political Sublime. Duke University Press.

Taylor, L., 2017. Handling heterogeneity in English geography textbooks 1850–2000. Journal of

Curriculum Studies, 49(5), pp.683-702.

Yaneva, A., 2017. Five ways to make architecture political: An introduction to the politics of

design practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.