Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SHANGHAI TANG :
LUXURY BRAND ?
INTRODUCTION :
HISTORY
1994
was the born year of Shanghai Tang by David Tang in Hongkong
Positioned as a custom tailoring business.
Using the best quality Chinese materials from luxurious Chinese silk to
the finest Mongolian cashmere and precious Chinese jade,
1996
A robust market selling Chinese Souvenirs to well-heeled tourist
Positioned changed to Ready to wear.
SHANGHAI TANG
HISTORY
1997
Shanghai Tang open a store on Madison Avenue in New York
The fashion world at 1997 seemed confused about whether Tang want to
lunch new era of fashion or keep selling Chinese fashion merchandise
1999
Tang had miscalculated the demand of Americans for Chinese Fashion
Shanghai Tang needed to be more modern, need continuous fresh design
to keep customer coming back
Clothes must be wearable and modern, not customey design
Shanghai Tang move to another smaller outlet far from Madison Avenue
SHANGHAI TANG
HISTORY
2001
David Tang decided to sell the major of shareholder to Richemond,
Luxury Group
But the revenue was still stagnant, it's not improving
Asian financial crisis happened, the store in Asia and America weren't
going well
2002
The SARS virus attacked the world, and it shuted down business in
Hongkong for six months
SHANGHAI TANG
HISTORY
2002 - 2003
Enter de Chermont (one of the member of Richemont) took over the
top level management of Shanghai Tang.
He changed the niche mission of Shanghai Tang to the first profitable
Chinese Brand
The company worked on repositioning Shanghai Tang, to be more
Modern, relevant and luxury. Since Prestige is the most important in the
Asian Market
But for a year, it is still out of touch with market
“The brand had no depth, no sincerity, no differentiation”
SHANGHAI TANG
HISTORY
TANG PRODUCT
Product
Brand Name
ACTUAL PRODUCT
Loyalty program
Returns and Exchanges
Refund and Cancellation
Payment Security
International Delivery
TARGETING AND
POSITIONING
India There might be a problem for Shanghai Tang to expand their market to India
Germany and southeast ASIA since those countries have opposite culture, they tend to
Japan use full body clothes and China use fenceless clothes.
Brazil
French So Shanghai Tang should do the same formula as they did in the U.S which
Indonesia mixes the culture and design the clothes with South East Asia Designer.
UK
Shanghai tang should not do Downward Stretching in their product lines to get a
lower level segment, because it will ruin the core customer value, which is
prestigious and luxury.
Shanghai Tang should extend their product line length, they should add more
kid’s product since the parent tend to spend more money on their kids and the
population of developing countries will increase every year, means many kids
will born or grow in several years
POSITIONINGS
COMPANY
Advantages
Has full control of the company and it is easy to make the
decision
The DNA of the company will not easy to be vanish
All the revenues only go to the company
Easy to make a product by their own creativity or Idea
without getting any interrupt by other parties.
It is lower cost than the other alternatives
Disadvantages
The risk is own by Shanghai Tang only.
Has Limited Idea and Creativity
Has no ability in marketing expertise of luxury market
Has to compete with another western luxury brand
ALLYING WITH WESTERN
COMPANY
Benefits
Shanghai Tang can get knowledge from Western Luxury brand
Shanghai Tang can mix the Chinese culture and modern fashion with designer from
western luxury brand
Shanghai Tan can get help in term of marketing expertise from Western luxury
brand
U.S is one of the big market of luxury market
Western allies can contribute to the improvement of the general image of Chinese
products, which will facilitate the development of future Chinese luxury brands.
Luxury is heavily influenced by western countries
Western luxury brands were generally perceived as being more luxurious and
prestigious,
Sharing Risk
ALLYING WITH WESTERN
COMPANY
Disadvantages
Shanghai Tang may lose their DNA
Sharing Profit
Each partner is an agent of the partnership and is
liable for actions by other partners
Hard to take a decision
It cost higher than without allying with Western
Company
CONCLUSION
SO MUCH!