Cody Bortle Arizona State INQUIRY MODULE REFLECTION 2 Inquiry Module Reflection 1) Peer reviews have been used for a long time and allows for students to obtain feedback on whatever project or essay they’re working on. This feedback is necessary so students can make the appropriate changes to their work to make sure it’s in it’s optimal condition prior to submission. Although peer reviews have been practiced for a long time not many people know how to use it properly. For example, it's important that your feedback is positive, but hints at what revisions you’re recommending. Also it is extremely important for whoever is receiving the feedback to read the comments and make the changes that are recommended. I recently received peer feedback on one of my major assignments for EDT 180 from my friend Brian. He suggested that for my section on Internet of Things that I should relate Podcasts to the actual topic itself more efficiently because he felt that the way I did it was not entirely effective. Throughout the feedback process he also stated that my research on the Google AIY Voice Kit was extremely effective and that my research had a lot to offer for those who were unfamiliar with the technology. Finally he mentioned about how strong my relation of the technologies I chose to research and my subject of interest was. Overall Briansuse of peer review in my project helped me submit an extremely well written assignment. 2) With the revisions that I received I am only able to modify a few of them because of time, expertise, or cost. For example, Brian suggested that I should take a different approach with the Internet of Things section because my approach with podcast was not completely successful. If I had enough time I would choose to change my technology entirely to 3D Printing and the use of them within the educational environment. I feel that 3D Printing would fit better with the topic of Internet of Things way better than Podcasts do, which would allow me to make a more compelling argument. He also suggested that I should change the approach I took with the shortfall of the Oculus Rift being too expensive and that I should research any other versions of the Oculus Rift that may be cheaper. This is an extremely effective revision and would not take too much time to complete. 3) Throughout this project I have learned a lot about the process of revision. In the past I have completed major projects and submitted them without taking a second look. However, since I’ve practiced peer review and revision, I feel that from now on with all major assignments I will practice them and submit better assignments. I learned that peer review isn’t all about the negative aspects of the assignment and that it is important to highlight the positives so the other person can recognize what was working in the assignment. If I were to restart this assignment I would take a different approach with the types of technology I researched so they will match the topics better and research them more in depth to offer more information to those who are unfamiliar. INQUIRY MODULE REFLECTION 3 4) Before completing this assignment I believed that the Oculus Rift was primarily used for gaming and could never be used as an educational asset. I was unaware of what it had to offer for educators. For example, since I would like to be either a math, art, or spanish teacher in the future the Oculus Rift would allow me to take my students on tours of different countries, mathematics driven structures, or even art museums. I have not taken a class that even had this technology available for students and didn’t consider what it had to offer from an educational standpoint.