You are on page 1of 5

IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information Communication Technology, May 20-21, 2016, India

A MIMO Antenna : Study on Reducing Mutual


Coupling and Improving Isolation
Pratima Nirmal, A.B.Nandgaonka, Sanjay L. Nalbalwa

Abstract— MIMO antenna has gained lot of attention for The performance of MIMO systems depends on cross-
research today due to various advantages such as increase in correlation coefficients between received signals by different
capacity, low signal loss and less multipath fading. Although it antenna elements and mutual coupling of antenna element [2].
has many benefits, the main challenge lies in the design of Thus, in MIMO antenna design, an important objective is to
MIMO Antenna i.e to reduce the mutual coupling between the minimize the correlation coefficient between antenna elements
antenna element and to provide high isolation. To reduce the
in order to increase the system capacity. Ideally the corelation
mutual coupling and for improving the isolation, various
techniques are employed such as Defected Ground Structure coefficent should be less than 0.5 dB for an good MIMO
such as slits, slot, spiral square structure, EBG structure, U antenna. Conventionally, the correlation coefficient can be
shaped parasitic element, stubs, neutralization line, parasitic reduced by increasing the distances between antenna elements
elements, etc. The mutual coupling of more than 20 dB is but eventually it will increase the size of the antenna. Besides
obtained by employing all these technique. The main focus of this these, mutual coupling should be less among the antenna
paper is to present and compare the different technique to reduce elements. The mutual coupling is higher for antenna elements
the mutual coupling and increase the isolation for various which is spaced less than 0.5λ. The presence of mutual
frequency bands. coupling degrades the radiation pattern, increases the cochanel
intereference and changes the input characteristic of the
Keywords— MIMO Antenna, EBG Structure, Defected Ground
antenna. The antenna element should be highly isolated from
Structure (DGS), Parasitic elements, Mutual Coupling.
each other to achieve better performance of MIMO Antenna.
I. INTRODUCTION The various techniques has to be incorporated between
the MIMO antenna element such as defected ground structure,
electromagnetic band gap structure, parasitic element,
neutralization line, metamaterial, etc to reduce the mutual
interference between the antenna elements and to improve the
isolation between the elements. The size, shape, position and
dimension of these isolation structures have to be optimized to
have huge amount of mutual coupling reduction. The
following section shows the study of various mutual coupling
techniques and a comparison between these different
technique is done.
Fig.1: MIMO system
The MIMO antenna as the name indicates consists of multiple II. RELATED WORK
antennas at transmitter and receiver side. MIMO antenna
system is denoted as MxN where M = Number of transmitting This section deals with various method proposed by different
antenna, N =Number of receiving antenna as shown in the author to reduce the mutual coupling in antenna system
Fig.1. MIMO systems make use of spatial multiplexing to A. Microstrip antenna with EBG structure for array
transmit data efficiently. Spatial multiplexing allows applications:
transmitting different streams of data simultaneously using
multiple antennas. The advantage of this method is that the
data rate can be increased without requiring more spectrums.
MIMO systems also make use of diversity to improve the
quality of signal. It exploits various forms of diversity such as
space diversity, polarization diversity and pattern diversity.
In order to achieve these benefits, we must design MIMO
antenna with compact size, low mutual coupling, greater
isolation and ground plane modifications.

Pratima Normal, Department Of Electronics and Telecommunication


Engineering, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere,
Raigad, India (pratima.nirmal@gmail.com )
Fig.2: Microstrip antenna array with EBG
A.B.Nandgaonkar, Department Of Electronics and Telecommunication
Engineering, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere,
and comparison is made between these techniques. This
Raigad, India (abnandgaonkar@yahoo.com) section also discussed the benefits and drawback of these
methods.
Sanjay L. Nalbalwa, Department Of Electronics and Telecommunication Electromagnetic band gap structures are periodic
Engineering, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere,
Raigad, India (nalbalwar_sanjayan@yahoo.com )
structures which is also known as photonic band gap structure
is widely used for reducing the Mutual coupling [3]. It has two

978-1-5090-0774-5/16/$31.00 © 2016 IEEE


1736
IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information Communication Technology, May 20-21, 2016, India

features: (a) to suppress the surface wave (b) in phase C. Compact dual band patch array antenna for
reflection coefficient [3].. These characteristics of EBG have MIMO system:
advantage of improving radiation pattern and gain of the
antenna [3]. The author initially studied the band gap
characteristic of mushroom type EBG for supression of
surface wave and the E and H mutual coupling of microstrip
antenna array separately [3]. Then they placed EBG structure
in between the microstrip array to reduce the mutual coupling
among the antenna elements [3]. The EBG structure is
simulated by using FDTD simulation method [3]. The
simulated and measured results are in good comparison with
each other. The antenna is made to resonant at 5.86 GHz with
8 dB mutual coupling reduction as compared to antenna Fig.4: 1x2 linear array antenna
without EBG .The disadvantage of EBG is its complexity in
design and they occupy a comparatively large area. The researcher has design U slotted rectangular array
antenna on duroid substrate for dual band frequency operation
for WLAN and LTE applications at 5 GHz and 3.5 GHz
B. PIFA MIMO Antenna with slitted pattern in
respectively having mutual coupling of less than 15 dB across
ground plane to improve mutual coupling:
the frequency bands [5]. Due to U shaped slot created in
radiating patches, there is increase in equivalent surface
current length [5]. The gain is more than 7 dBi over dual band
frequency operation with efficiency of more than 80%. The
antenna is simulated using ADS software and is compared
with the measured fabricated results [5] .

D. Mutual Coupling reduction in arrays using High


impedance surface:

Fig.5: Array configaturion in E and H plane integrated with High impedance


Fig.3: Geometry of PIFA antenna with slitted ground structure surface

A PIFA MIMO Antenna with center to center spacing of Electromagnetic band gap structure are also known as high
0.116λo has been designed by authors at resonating frequency impedance surface can be inserted between the antenna array
2.31 GHz [4]. The authors has introduced the pair of slits of to reduce mutual coupling between the antenna [6]. The author
equal length in ground plane to reduce the isolation. The slits had studied the high impedance surface such as mushroom
introduced in the ground plane perturbed the current type EBG and fork type EBG structure for its band gap
distribution of the ground plane and it blocks the current to characteristics at 10 GHz frequency [6]. It has zero phase
propagate from one element to other antenna element [4]. reflection coefficients resulting into high impedance structure.
These slit act as inductance and capacitance which act as a These EBG structure can be represent by an LC filter where
band stop filter at desired resonating frequency of antenna. inductance arises due to current flowing through via and
Moreover this technique can be extend to three or more capacitance arises due to gap between the EBG patches [6].
antenna, monopole antenna or more than two radiating
patches. The isolation of more than 20 dB is achieved by using ∆⍵ 1
this technique. Moreover structure is easy to fabricate and
𝐵𝐵. 𝑊𝑊 = = �𝐿𝐿/𝐶𝐶 …….(1)
⍵ 𝜂𝜂
have low cost [4]. where ⍵ =
1
√𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿
and η = 120 п is the free space impedance.

Further E and H coupling of microstrip antenna array has been


studied for surface wave propagation . Then one coloumn of
EBG patches is inserted between E coupled and H coupled
microstrip array as shown in fig.4 to reduce the mutual
coupling. The S21 without EBG is -53 dB and by employing

1737
IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information Communication Technology, May 20-21, 2016, India

mushroom EBG structure and fork shape EBG structure :S21 wave between air and superstrate. So the near field coupling
reduces to -64 dB and -84 dB at reasonant frequency of 10 can be reduced by placing an extra clement which will
GHz is reported [6]. induce an opposite current to direct coupling current leading to
cancellation of current and hence improved isolation between
antenna is achieved [8]. The two microstrip antenna is placed
E. Reduction of mutual coupling in microstrip patch antenna
at 0.6 λ apart from each other having S21 of about -30 dB at
using rectangular defected ground structure:
reasonnat frequency 2.44 GHz [8].

G. Compact MIMO antenna For UWB applications:

Fig.6: Geometry of antenna array structure

A rectangular DGS consisting up of pair of rectangular


slits of length L and width W is etched in the ground plane to
reduce the mutual coupling of 16.5 dB among the closely Fig.8: Geometry of proposed antenna
spaced micro strip patch antenna at resonant frequency 9.2
GHz has been reported by the authors [7]. The designed The two square monopole mimo antenna having good
antenna is fabricated on FR-4 substrate having thickness of isolation are placed perpendicular to each other for UWB
1.59 mm and is fed by 50 Ω microstrip line on ground plane of application has been reported [9]. Two stubs are added in the
63.5 mm x 40 mm [7].These slits act as filtering structure and ground plane to increase the isolation and the impedance
poseses rejection band at 9.2 GHz [7].. The parametric study bandwidth of the antenn [9].. Besides, a short strip is used for
such as dimension , spacing , length and width, number of slit connecting the both monopole ground together. The length
is done to have maximum amount of isolation among the and position of the stub is optimized to have wide isolation
microstrip antennas [7]. The maximum no of slit optimized is across the frequency band [9].. The entire structure is placed
three. By increasing the number of slit there is huge on 26 x 40 mm2 ground structure leading to compact size of
interaction between the slits and the antenna which degrade antenna. The microsrtip antenna is fed by 50Ω microstrip line.
the S-parameter. The mutual coupling of more than -15 dB and envelope
correlation of less than 0.2 dB is obtained across the 3.1- 10.6
GHz frequency band [9].
F. Reduction of mutual coupling in microstrip patch antenna
using U shaped microstrip section : H. Mutual coupling reduction Using EBG structure:

Fig.7: Antenna structure with U shaped microstrip


Section

The mutual coupling is reduced by simply placing a U


shaped microstrip patch antenna is proposed [8]. The U
shaped microstrip section is placed between suspended
microstrip patch antenna having height of 8 mm between Fig.9: Study of Mutual coupling in Arperture Coupled Microstrip patch
Antenna
superstrate and the ground plane [8]. The gain of greater than
The aperture couple feed microstrip antenna with
8 dBi is found for the desired frequency. Since suspended
mushroom type EBG Structure to reduce the mutual coupling
antenna is used, the mutual coupling can occur in two ways:
has been studied and purposed [10]. The designed antenna
(a) direct near field coupling (b) coupling through surface

1738
IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information Communication Technology, May 20-21, 2016, India

resaonant at frequency of 10.5 GHz. The upper superstrate has


pemitivity of 4.4 and lower substrate having permitivity of
10.2 is used to feed the mircrostrip line [10]. The increase in
bandwidth is obtained due to high thickness of substrate. The
one antenna is fixed and other antenna is moved from point A
to G i.e from E plane to H plane in order to study the mutual
coupling between the two antennas [10].
The dispersion diagram of EBG structure which is placed
between the microstrip fed antenna is analyzed using FDTD
method for surface wave supression effects for the desired
working band of antenna. Then row of EBG is incorporated
between antennas to reduce the mutual coupling among the
antennas by 16.4 dB [10].

I. Closely spaced MIcrostrip MIMO antenna with slot to


improve isolation :

Fig.11: E shaped MIMO antenna (a) placed orthogonally


(b) placed parallely

By placing two slots it create an extra U shaped current


path which leads to an extra resonance [12]. E shaped patch
without slot, one slot and two slot has been studied for
different frequency band of operation. The two array of such
printed E shaped monopole antenna in five different
configuration has been analyzed to lower the mutual coupling
[12]. Further envelope correlation coefficient and radiation
pattern of antenna is measured to show the effect of mutual
coupling. The spacing between MIMO antenna is set to
10mm. It has been observed that the antenna element when
placed orthogonal to each other have low mutual coupling as
compared to antenna element when placed perpendicular to
each other [12]. The proposed antenna is simulated using
HFSS software.

Fig.10: MIMO antenna with single slot in ground plane III. CONCLUSIONS
An simple method to reduce the mutual coupling at 5.8
GHz for WLAN applications with the help of single slot is This paper presents the detailed study and comparison of
proposed by the researchers. The microstrip antenna is placed various techniques to reduce the mutual coupling in MIMO
at a distance of 0.33 λ0 from each other is fabricated on the antenna which is proposed by the different authors. The
substrate of having permittivity 2.65 and loss tangent 0.0015 various method to reduce the mutual coupling such as
[11]. The ground plane dimension is of size of 0.85 λ0 × 0.55 Mushroom type EBG, sliited groundplane, Rectangular DGS,
λ0 . The length and width of antenna is equal to 15.5 mm. U shaped parasitic element, protruding stubs, etc has been
The dimension and position of the slot is optimized and studied.
parametric study has been done to have good amount of These each method described above has its own
isolation [11]. advantages and disadvantages in term of complexity, cost,
The proposed design is simulated using IE3D software. fabrication technique and mode of operation. The researcher
The proposed method has a good amount of isolation of had also tried to improve capacity of system, bit error rate,
around 45 dB as compared to the other antenna. gain, and diversity of the MIMO antenna system. Further the
stated MIMO antenna can be used for single, dual and
multiband applications. There is more scope of doing research
J. Triband E Shaped MIMO antena : in printed MIMO antennas with compact size and multibands
Initially E shaped monopole antenna is designed for single for various applications.
resonance at frequency 2.4 GHz for MIMO applications [12].
Then two slots is placed within E shaped monopole to create
an extra two resonance at 5.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz respectively.

1739
IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information Communication Technology, May 20-21, 2016, India

TABLE I: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHOD TO REDUCE MUTUAL COUPLING

Radiation
Mutual
Technique to improve Band of ECC Surface current Complexity pattern
Ref. coupling
Isolation operation measured Distribution shown to deisgn Deteriotaion
(S21) dB

3 Mushroom Type EBG -24.6 dB Single NO NO Difficult NO

4 Slitted pattern in ground plane -20 dB Single NO YES Simple YES


-18 dB
5 Space diversity Dual NO YES Simple NO

Mushroom type EBG -68 dB


6 Single NO NO Difficult NO
Fork type EBG -84 dB

7 Rectangular DGS -32 dB Single NO YES Simple YES

8 U shaped Microstrip section -31 dB Single NO NO Simple NO

9 Two Protruding stubs -38 dB UWB YES YES Simple YES


Row of Mushroom type EBG
10 -48 dB Single NO NO Difficult NO
structure

11 Slot -45 dB Single NO YES Simple YES

12 Orthogonally placed -42 dB Triple YES YES Simple NO

REFERENCES
IEEE International Wireless Symposium (IWS), X'ian, pp. 1-4, March
[1] Atif Jamil, Mohd Zuki Yusoff and Noorhana Yahya," Current Issues and 2014.
Challenges of MIMO Antenna Designs", IEEE conference on Intelligent [11] J. OuYang, F. Yang and Z. M. Wang,"Reducing Mutual Coupling of
and Advanced Systems (ICIAS),Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, pp. 1 - 5, June Closely Spaced Microstrip MIMO Antennas for WLAN Application",
2010.
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters,vol.10, pp. 310-313,
[2] Christian Volmer, Jorn Weber, Ralf Stephan and Matthias A. April 2011.
Hein,"Mutual coupling in multi-antenna systems: Figures-of-merit and
[12] S. Nezhad and H. Hassani,"A Novel Triband E-Shaped Printed
practical verification", European conference on Antennas and
Monopole Antenna for MIMO Application", IEEE Antennas and
Propagation,Berlin,pp.1114-1118, March 2009.
Wireless Propagation Letters,vol.9,pp. 576-579, May 2010.
[3] Fan Yang and Y. Rahmat Samii ,"Microstrip antennas integrated with
electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: a low mutual coupling
design for array applications", IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, Vo:51, pp.2936 - 2946, Oct 2003.
[4] Chi-Yuk Chiu, Chi-Ho Cheng, Ross D. Murch and Corbett R. Rowell,"
Reduction of Mutual Coupling Between Closely-Packed Antenna
Elements", IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation ,vol. 55, pp.
1732-1738, June 2007.
[5] W. Swelam , M.Ali Soliman, Ali Gomaa and T.E.Taha ,"Compact Dual-
Band Microstrip Patch Array Antenna for MIMO 4G Communication
Systems", Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium
(APSURSI),Toronto, pp. 1-4, July 2010.
[6] Cuong Tran Manh, Xiaoke Han, H. Hafdallah Ouslimani, Alain Priou,
Aurélien Marteau and Gérard Collignon ,"Reduction of the coupling
between Microstrip Arrays Antennas Using High Impedance Surface
(HIS) Structures", European Microwave Conference (EuMC) , Paris,
pp.1453-1456, Sept 2010.
[7] Asieh Habashi, Javad Nourinia and Changiz Ghobadi,"A rectangular
defected ground structure (DGS) for reduction of mutual coupling
between closely-spaced microstrip antenna", 20th Iranian Conference
on Electrical Engineering (ICEE),Tehran, pp. 1347-1350, May 2012.
[8] S. Farsi, Hadi Aliakbarian, Dominique Schreurs, B. Nauwelaers and Guy
A.E. Vandenbosch,"Mutual Coupling Reduction Between Planar
Antennas by Using a Simple Microstrip U-Section",IEEE Antennas and
Wireless Propagation Letters , vol.11 , pp. 1501-1503, Dec 2012.
[9] Li Liu, S. W. Cheung and T. I. Yuk,"Compact MIMO Antenna for
Portable Devices in UWB Applications", IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, Vol.61,Issue 8, pp. 4257-4264, May 2013.
[10] Ning Ma and Huiling Zhao,"Reduction of the mutual coupling between
aperture coupled microstrip patch antennas using EBG structure", 2014

1740

You might also like