Matriks Sorotan Kajian Berkaitan Penerimaan GURU & VLE

Analisis
Sumber Sampel/Lokasi Teori Faktor Penerimaan Moderator Dapatan Instrumen Jurang
Data
 The findings suggest that
three variables are useful
predictors of intention for
future use of organizational e-
learning: low complexity,
authenticity and technical
 Age
979 employees support
Fleming, J., Becker, K., & Newton, C. (2017). Factors  Perceive Complexity  Future research could expand into
who had  overall satisfaction with e-
for successful e-learning: does age matter? Education  Authentic learning Path Model different industries and contexts in
completed two or TAM NA learning was found to be an Questionnaire
+ Training, 59(1), 76–89. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07- (PU) Analysis order to further explore the
more e-learning intermediate variable in the
2015-0057  Technical support generalizability of findings.
courses relationship between these
 Overall satisfaction factors and intentions to use
e-learning in the future
 age was not a significant
factor impacting either future
use intentions or satisfaction
with e-learning
  

Analisis Konstruk Kajian Lepas Berkaitan Penerimaan Teknologi dalam Kalangan GURU
Pengkaji
Bourgonjon
De Smet, Pynoo, B.,
, J., De Pynoo, B.,
C., Devolder,
Grove, F., Abdullah, Tondeur,
Kuo, D. C.- Bourgonjon P., van Raaij, Hu, P. J.
Hew, T. S., De Smet, Z., Mansor, Nam, C. S., J., Van Chen, H. Wang, W. Yuen, A. H.
Hubungan Teo, T., & Abdullah, Sumak, B., Jeong, H. Wong, G. L., Wu, Y.- Nair, I., & , J., De Tondeur, E. M., & H., Clark,
& Kadir, S. Kelly, H. C., Van N., & Bahn, S., & Braak, J., R., & T., & Wang, K., & Ma,
Zhou, M. F., & Ward, & Sorgo, A. I., & Kim, Y. K. W. T., & Hsu, Das, M. V. Wever, B., J., Van Schepers, T. H. K., &
L. S. A. (2014) Looy, J., Hassanuddi Lee, R. Duyck, W., Tseng, H. C. C. W. W. K.
(2016). R. (2016). (2016) (2016). (2016) C.-L. (2012) Schellens, Braak, J., J. J. L. Ma, W. W.
(2016) Soetaert, n, N. A. (2013). Sijnave, B., F. (2012) (2009) (2008)
(2013) T., & Duyck, W., (2008). (2003).
R., & (2013). & Duyck, P.
Valcke, M. & Duyck, P.
Valcke, M. (2012).
(2012). (2011).
(2013).
CoTL→TA +0.463
+0.04
Exp→PU +0.169
(NS)
SN→PU +0.301 +0.07 +0.31 +0.3 +0.54 -0.32
Enj→PU +0.452
CA→PU +0.070
-0.07
SE→PU +0.174
(NS)
 Rujukan Dapatan/ Model

Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning
on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(March), 1–15.
http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
 QUESTION PAPER

TITLE ....

QUESTION PAPER

DEGREE OF PHILOSOPHY DOCTOR

Name: ... ..
 CHAPTER ONE:

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Study

1.2. Problem Statement

The integration of technologies in classrooms to enhance learning has been highlighted in numerous studies (Wong, Teo & Russo, 2013; Katsamani, Retalis, & Boloudakis,
2012; Lu & Law, 2012). In this regards, Malaysian teachers are expected to integrate technologies in their daily teaching and learning activities. Having that, many Malaysian
schools, with the support from related government departments, have devoted considerable resource to technology. Malaysian schools and colleges have included computer
technology as an integral part of learning experiences and as a way to equip them with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in the 21st century. As the consequence,
electronic based teaching tools are becoming increasingly prevalent in Malaysian classrooms. The Malaysian Ministry of Education (MOE) has highlighted the significance of
computer-based technology in schools.

1.3. Frame

Given the vital role of BL teaching and learning for in our current Malaysian educational system, and growing concern the vital responsibility of practicing teachers the process
of integrating blended learning in schools, time has come to review and examine factors that influence BL acceptance among these teachers . The findings from this study
enable policymakers and educators have a better view and more informed knowledge on the factors that have significant impacts on the use and acceptance of BL. They are
more inclined to design programs that enhance the use of BL among teachers. Thus, the purpose of the study is to explore and understand how far factors such as School
Environment, Computer Attitudes and Computer Teaching Efficacy could have significant relationship with BL acceptance in teaching among Malaysian teachGiven the vital
role of BL teaching and learning for in our current Malaysian educational system, and growing concern the vital responsibility of practicing teachers the process of integrating
blended learning in schools, time has come to review and examine factors that influence BL acceptance among these teachers. The findings from this study enable
policymakers and educators have a better view and more informed knowledge on the factors that have significant impacts on the use and acceptance of BL. They are more
inclined to design programs that enhance the use of BL among teachers. Thus, the purpose of the study is to explore and understand how far factors such as School
Environment, Computer Attitudes and Computer Teaching Efficacy could have significant relationship with BL acceptance in teaching among Malaysian teachers.

Given the vital role of BL teaching and learning for in our current Malaysian educational system, and growing concern the vital responsibility of practicing teachers the process
of integrating blended learning in schools, time has come to review and examine factors that influence BL acceptance among these teachers . The findings from this study
enable policymakers and educators have a better view and more informed knowledge on the factors that have significant impacts on the use and acceptance of BL. They are
more inclined to design programs that enhance the use of BL among teachers. Thus, the purpose of the study is to explore and understand how far factors such as School
Environment, Computer Attitudes and Computer Teaching Efficacy could have significant relationship with BL acceptance in teaching among Malaysian teachers.

Theory
1.4. Research Objective

1.5. Research questions

1.7. Theoretical framework of the study

Examples of Figure 1. The framework of the study theory

Example 2.

iv dv
Figure 2: Theoretical framework of the study

Example 3:
Figure 3: Theoretical framework of the study
Example 4:

Figure 4: Theoretical framework of the study

EXAMPLE 5:

Figure 5: Theoretical framework of the study

1.8. Rationale of the Study

1.9. Operational definition

1.10. The importance of the study

1.11. Limitation of the Study

CHAPTER TWO:

LITERATURE OVERVIEW

2.1.Problems

This part of the researcher will explain some literature relating to the relevant studies that some researchers have done. The researcher divides this part into concept
........................, ........................., ............................... as well as models related to ...................... and past studies related to ............................................. .. as well as those
associated with the selected variables.

2.2. The concept .......................... (DESCRIPTION OF ANY VARIABLE STUDY)

Explicit measures tend to rely on self-reports or easily observed behaviors. These tend to involve bipolar scales (e.g.,
good-bad, favorable-unfavorable, support-opposition, etc.). [44] Explicit measures can also be used by measuring the
straightforward attribution of characteristics to nominate groups. Explicit attitudes that develop in response to recent
information, automa

. Teori-teori berkaitan
2.4. Related theories

2.6. Review of related studies (OVERSEAS COUNTRY)

2.7. Review of the study (IN NEAGRA)

2.8. Study gap (Gap) and rationale of variable selection.

Figure 7: Summary of literature (critical analysis)

No WRITING RELATIONSHIPS / METHODOLOGY INSTRUMENT & SAMPLE GAP / DEFINITION Theory

1 Fleming, J., Becker, K., & Newton, C. (2017). Factors for successful e-learning: does age matter? Education + Training, 59 (1), 76-89. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2015-
0057 The findings suggest that three variables are useful predictors of intention for future use of organizational e-learning: low complexity, authenticity and technical
support

overall satisfaction with e-learning was found to be an intermediate variable in the relationship between these factors and intentions to use e-learning in the future

age was not a significant factor impacting either future use intentions or satisfaction with e-learning TAM Teacher

SBT questionaire Future research can expand into different industries and contexts in order to further explore the generalizability of findings.

Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820
(March), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
Teachers' CoTL have a significant influence on their technology acceptance.

Moderation effects of the proposed variables were not found. TAM

TRA 592 school teachers from a South-East Asian country (Singapore) Types of technologies examined in this study were not specified in the survey questions.

Further research that involves random sampling from many regions to increase generalizability

2.9. Study variables ..........

2.8.5. The rationale for selecting the study variables

2.8.6. Rational selection theory

Theoretical / Social Theory of Behavioral Behavior (Bndura) TRA

(Ajzen, 1991) Theory Of Crime study (Holmes, 2011) Immunities theory of Behavoiur (Zeller, 2002) Good Moral Theory (Malik, 2011)

Razak et al (2016)

Peter & Crouch (2017)

Liza & Madiah (2016)

Al Bukra (2015)

Al Bellaki et al (2017)

Ajzen (1991)

Atmar & Zeller (2017)

Assayuti (2017)
Based on the literature review made, the researcher found that most previous researchers used the theory .................................. .... as the framework of each study's
theory. This suggests that this theory is so demanding in the context of the study and being a fairly stable theory in explaining ............................... ..................this research.
According to Peter et al. (2017) states that social theory is a superior theoretically capable of predicting aspects of research that have been described and resolved to
explain the phenomenon of the study. In line with the author of Ajzen (1991) The theory ... is a very precise theory of human behavior.

The theory used by researchers in the context of this study is ........................................ ........ (theoretical name). This theory was founded by ..............................................
............... (name of founder and year). and he is used extensively and fits in the context of this study. This theory explains that .............................................. ..................
(explain your dv and your hypothesis). In the context of this study, this theory will be able to predict ........................................ ........... (Survey Dv) against
.................................. ................................. (IV study). Based on literature reviews made by the researcher, the researchers found that the variables described in previous
surveys were insufficient to describe the phenomenon in particular. For example ................................................ ................. (insert some previous studies of Citation) just
managed to explain 46% variance only. This means that the variables can still be explained in the context of this study. Therefore, the researcher feels that this theory is
suitable for use in the context of this study.

2.10. Conceptual framework of the study

Figure: The conceptual framework of the study

CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1. Introduction

This chapter discusses the methodology used by the researcher to collect and analyze the data to get the results of the study to further the objectives and objectives of the
study. It covers study design, population and sample studies, instrument of study, validity and reliability of instruments, data collection procedures and data analysis. All
discussions lead to the purpose of gaining and seeing the influence ....................................................................................... ..

3.2. Research design

The study basically uses quantitative methods. The quantitative method is used to describe the nature of the current expost Facto (causal effect) which is ongoing at the
time of the study and able to make the right interpretation (Mohd Nasir, 2003). Quantitative descriptive methods can illustrate phenomena, show relationships, test
hypotheses, make predictions and get the meaning of the implications of a problem that you want to solve (Sukarmin, 2010).

A survey study aims to gather information about the variables to be investigated and appropriate to the purpose of the study. This survey study is usually conducted in
educational research (Mohd Majid 2000). Furthermore, Sekaran (1992) explains if this study is planned and carried out in accordance with standard practices, it can
produce a high reliability.

3.3. Population and sample studies

The population of this study is ............................................. .. Sample selection from ............................................. .. is based on a previous report showing that ......
................................................ .. The sample selection of this study is based on the sample size determination of Krejcie and Morgan (1970) which is a population of
.............................. .. respondents, the number of sample sizes required and calculated accordingly is as much as ....................................... people. According to Gay (2006),
the minimum sample number of survey types is 10 percent of the total population. While Mohammad Najib (1999) suggested 30 per cent of the sample for the perception
study.

Table 1: Number .......................................................................................... ..

Number of population Estimated sample of study

17000

........................ .. 370

............................

Total sample of study: ...... 370 ............ .. people

Source: Kedah State Education Department ............................................. ..

3.4. Sampling method

This study uses a stratified random sampling method. The use of this method is suitable for non-uniform (heterogeneous) populations such as those in IPTAs who have
diploma and diploma students. The stratified random sampling method is also capable of reducing sampling errors (Konting, 2005). The use of stratified random methods
requires researchers to first identify the stratum of the study population. In this study the identified stratum in the study population was the teachers of Malay language
(not the option) who taught in high school in Pahang state. Samples from non-option teachers need to be obtained to ensure the sample of the study can represent the
population of the study. Then the number of stratum populations is sought. After the stratum population was obtained, the researchers divide the stratum population with
the values obtained from the Krejcie and Morgan charts to obtain the sample quantities. For example, the Krejcie and Morgan tables (1970) state that, if the population is
600, then the sample of the study is 234.
L

70 P

50

37 P

43

14 P

40

Type equation here.

Figure 2: Determination of study sample

3.6. Research instrument

The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed based on previous studies. The research used was adapted from the previous
researcher's research relevant to this study. Since the instruments used have fulfilled the validity and reliability aspects, the content of the validity of the content has been
fulfilled (Sanchez-Franco and Roldán, 2010). Measurements for each construct are combined to form research instruments compiled as follows:

Table 2: Summary of Instrument Review

Variable item (variable item) Referenced source (reference sources) Total questions

3.8. Validity

The validity of this study refers to measuring what was supposed to be measured (Kerlinger 1986). In summary, instruments used in research should be able to measure
exactly what to measure. Highly-legged research shows that the findings are based on facts or evidence and are able to give precise justification (Creswell & Clark 2011).
3.8.1. Content validity

One of the criteria for fulfilling the validity of content is through literature review (Jusoh, 2008). The items used in this study were identified through past studies thus
meeting the validity criteria of the content. Since the instruments used have fulfilled the validity and reliability aspects, the content of the validity of the content has been
fulfilled (Sanchez-Franco and Roldán, 2010).

3.8.2. Face validity

Then the questionnaire was given to 3 experts (refer to Appendix E) to determine face validity before the questionnaire was distributed to the respondent. According to Lyn
(1986), for the purpose of obtaining a validity, the questionnaire requires a minimum of three experts but does not need to exceed ten. To get the value of I-CVI,
researchers will find the average value of the scale points by summing up their scores given by each expert and divide that value by the number of specialists. According to
Stewart & Haswell, 2013; Polit & Beck, 2006), the acceptable I-CVI is 0.80 and above, while the value of 0.90 is an excellent value for the face value. After calculating 2 items
were dropped because the I-CVI value was less than 0.80.

Table 8: Scores for each item to rate I-CVI

SPECIAL ITEM 1 SPEAK 2 SPECIFIC 3 I-CVI

1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

9 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

16 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.66

17 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.66

AVERAGE 1.00 0.94 0.94 16.33

= 16.33

S-CVI = AVE I-CVI = 0.96

AVE I

3.10. Pre testing test

Before distributing the questionnaire to the actual respondents, researchers conducted pre test tests on questionnaires that were formed although the questions were
constructed and adapted from the questionnaire previously tested. The first phase of February 12, 2015 researchers provide a translated questionnaire from the English
language to two Malay language lecturers. The purpose of this test is to identify the clarity of the questions), as well as the suitability of language and grammar as well as
any confusion as well as proposed improvements that may be possible to strengthen the questionnaire. According to (Hunt, 1982) it should be carried out to see the
suitability, the clarity of the language of the measuring instrument to be used by the researcher.

Pre test trial test results First phase, some suggestions and comments have been received. Among them:

1 .................. ..

2 .................. ..

The second phase of the test was conducted on March 10, 2015. The set of survey instruments was provided to four different students (teacher trainees) of different
disciplines in Islamic Studies. Instruments used are instruments that have been added well based on response results in the first phase. The feedback received, the four
students (trainee teachers) stated that the questions read from the given instruments were well understood and the sentences used were also clear. Therefore, the
researcher will use the question which has been improved and improved in the actual pilot study of 100 respondents to be randomly selected. The selected data will be
analyzed to see the reliability of the instrument and produce irrelevant details.

The third phase, the researcher distributed the questionnaire instrument, to 220 teaching staff to determine the validity of the instrument used either suitable for the
purpose of this study. Reliability test using Cronbach Alpha analysis and validity test by using analytical factor (Nunnally, 1978) was conducted on 6 constructs found in the
questionnaire. This Cronbach Alpha analysis implements the internal consistency reliability method recommended by Churchill (1979) is well suited to field research as it
only requires an administrative measure for an instrument (Nunnally, 1978).

3.10. A pilot study

Before the questionnaire was distributed to the sample, the researcher would conduct a pilot study. Pilot study should be carried out in every research before the actual
study is conducted. This is to ensure that the psychometric characteristics of the study tool and each item in each construct can be evaluated and the reliability of the study
tool is ensured and in its true value. This study will be conducted on ............................................................................................................ ..

This pilot study will be conducted with the objective of identifying the problems with the understanding and interpretation of the respondents on question items in the
questionnaire, looking at the time allocated to answer items in the questionnaire and getting responses from respondents to improve the items. Data from the
questionnaire will be processed using the IBM SPSS version 20.0 software to determine the reliability level of questionnaire items through the Internal Consistency method.

Pilot Research will be held by the researcher at a later time. The survey form has been administered by the researcher to determine the validity and reliability of the
questionnaires to be used in the actual study. In the pilot test the expert opinion can be obtained to improve the validity and quality of the instruments used (Nunnally &
Bernstein, 1994; Forza, 2002; Calvo-Mora, Leal & Roldan, 2006; Hair et al., 2007).

However, the choice of respondents should not be statistically conducted (Cooper & Schindler, 2006) due to this pilot study is not aimed at to generalize, but focus on the
clarity of the questions, the items, the format and scale of the measurement used. There are some reasonable indicators or general guidelines that can be used for the
purpose of selecting the sample size of the pilot study. Generally, the sample size for pilot study is small. Cooper and Schindler (2006) suggested between 25 to 100
respondents. Forza (2002) suggested about 15 respondents. Hair et al. (2003) set between 5 to 30 respondents. In pilot studies, a group of subjects (proposed using a
number of 30 to 40 subjects) to answer the measurement items that have been constructed (Chua, 2006). However, in the early stages the researcher wanted to distribute
the questionnaire to 100 respondents based on the suggestion stated by Gorsuch (1983) which states that the ideal number for pilot study is not less than 100 (Rule of
Gorsuch) as well as suggestions made by (Mac Callum, Widaman and Zhang and Hong, 1999). However, based on the views of some experts it is suggested that the
researchers distribute questions to larger numbers for better results as factor analysis in quantitative studies requires large amounts of data. Therefore, the researcher
distributed the questionnaire to .............................................................................................................

3.10. Factor analysis

Before the analytical factor procedure can be carried out, the refined pilot data should meet the assumption of data normality. In addition, the preliminary assessment of
instrument items found that the value of the adequacy of Kaizer-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) sample was 0.645 while the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity test was significant 0.00.
(Results of both tests show the adequacy of the sample to produce significant factors for the study) The anti-image diagonal index (anti image) shows the correlation value
above 0.50 (Field, 2009). not less than .30, is at a minimum (Hair et al., 1998).

Before analyzing the main analysis, factor analysis has been carried out by researchers to test the construct validity of all independent variables and dependent variables for
this study. Factor analysis was carried out by the researcher to further strengthen the instruments. According to Cooper (1990), the use of certified instruments such as
factor analysis can help researchers identify the correct variable selection for measurement purposes. Factor analysis was carried out on variables
................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................... Test
results of the factor analysis has been implemented as the next paragraph.

3.8. Research tool reliability

The validity of this study refers to measuring what was supposed to be measured (Kerlinger 1986). In summary, instruments used in research should be able to measure
exactly what to measure. Highly-legged research shows that the findings are based on facts or evidence and are able to give precise justification (Creswell & Clark 2011).
While the reliability of the study refers to the consistency of a measure and the stability of a measure over time (Cohen et al., 2011 Creswell 2008). If measurements
provide the same or almost identical measurements each time the measurements are made on the same individual, then the measurement has high reliability.

In testing the measurement model, validity and reliability testing need to be done to determine whether the instrument to be used is actually measuring the concept that
should be measured (Sekaran and Bougie, 2010). Before distributing the questionnaires to the actual study sample, the researcher conducted a pilot study first. The
questionnaire was distributed to 100 teachers who were not a sample of the study. A pilot study was conducted on 100 teachers around Kuantan Pahang. According to
Nunally and Bernstein (1994), there are three types of validity ie content validity, predictive validity and construct validity.
One of the criteria for fulfilling the validity of content is through literature review (Jusoh, 2008). The items used in this study were identified through past studies thus
meeting the validity criteria of the content. Construct validity refers to the extent to which the results obtained from the use of certain instruments, conform to the theory
or concepts used and evaluated through convergent validity and discriminant validity (Sekaran and Bougie, 2010). To see the validity of the research constructor conducts
the Factor Analysis (CFA) procedure while looking at

Facebook And Apple Are Serious About Augmented Reality

Bernard MarrContributor

Enterprise & Cloud

When Facebook and Apple make extraordinary investments in new technology like they are with augmented reality, you know it's something to pay attention
to. Both companies have made it clear recently that they are committed to developing, testing and implementing augmented reality technology. Apple is more
focused on creating tools for the development community while Facebook's strategy is making AR available to the masses.
Adobe StockADOBE STOCK

What is augmented reality (AR)?

Augmented reality is the technology that puts virtual objects into the real world either through an AR headset or by using the camera on a phone or tablet. Users
then interact with those virtual objects from the screen, and the line that separates the virtual from the real world becomes a bit fuzzy. The bunny ears and
mustaches of selfie filters are one of the most obvious applications, but augmented reality was also the technology behind the Pokémon GO video game that
launched in 2016 and quickly became an obsession for many around the world as users chased Pokémon characters around public areas. We’re just at the
beginning of the possibilities and as augmented reality matures it is expected to change many things from how we work to how we play, learn and connect.

Apple’s ARKit 2.0 Released

With the announcement recently that they were releasing ARKit 2.0, the third version of Apple’s developer platform for AR apps, the company is stepping up
its commitment to the technology. Bank of America Merrill Lynch expects augmented reality to be an $8 billion “revenue opportunity” for Apple.

One of the drivers of Apple’s growth is expected to be AR apps that will “command a price premium” but also the additional sales of iPhones due to the new
technology. Here are a few apps that are already deployed or are in prototype thanks to ARKit:

 IKEA Place: No more guessing how furniture will look, feel and fit in your home. With this app, you can imagine it and virtually “place” true-to-scale IKEA
objects in your space.
 American Airlines: This AR app prototype overlays real-time info to your surroundings in airport terminals so you can navigate with ease whether you
need to grab something to eat or find the nearest restroom.
 Complete Anatomy: Imagine how lifelike learning can be with the Complete Anatomy app that lets users see the human body in great detail.

Facebook Tests AR Ads

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Grads of Life BRANDVOICE

Businesses Should Be Leaders In Training Workers

Civic Nation BRANDVOICE

How Attorneys Are Helping Create An America Of We, Us, And Ours

Despite recent negative press, Facebook is still popular and has atremendous reach on its platforms—more than 1.3 billion users on Messenger, 2 billion on
Facebook and 800 million on Instagram.

Facebook wants to make AR available to the masses and with their tremendous reach they already have a head start. It's easier for people to experiment in AR
with the app they already have—Facebook, Instagram, and Messenger—and they definitely expect to expand beyond face filters.
Some Facebook advertisers are getting exclusive access to test out ads with special effects with "tap it to try it on features." Want to see how a pair of
sunglasses looks on your face—you can do so virtually with AR. So far, Pottery Barn, Wayfair, NYX Professional Makeup and Bobbi Brown are a few
businesses who have been able to test this AR ad functionality.

Another AR innovation introduced at the F8 conference was the ability to make regular photos look 3D. This has potential to provide additional applications in
AR such as incorporating a 3D object as a virtual gift in a news post. Besides, AR can be used in Facebook Messenger to visualize and try out products.

Facebook also introduced a feature that lets you connect images, logos and signs with augmented content. It’s part of a closed beta test of “target tracking” that
uses the Facebook camera and movie posters for A Wrinkle in Time and Ready Player One that connects real-world pictures with augmented content. This is an
example of persistent AR, where the experience is connected—and persists—based on places or things in the real world.

The partnership between developers and the large tech companies of Apple and Facebook allowed AR applications to be dreamed up and built out creating
opportunities for games and play, business solutions and revenue opportunities.

Bernard Marr is an internationally best-selling author, popular keynote speaker, futurist, and a strategic business & technology advisor to governments and
companies. He helps organisations improve their business performance, use data more intelligently, and understand t...
MORE

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/08/08/facebook-and-apple-are-serious-about-augmented-reality/#2b2cdffa6b4b