DISCUSSION 1

Discussion

Prepared by

Name

Date
 DISCUSSION 2

Introduction

The research thesis was to look at how fungal competitors affect the physical soil

response, effect of fungi on soil water repellency was investigated through inoculation of

Mycena galopus; and hydrophobic Armillaria fungi competitors. The change in soil water

repellency and infiltration is measured by the water repellency index. One of the leading causes

of soil water repellency is hydrophobic fungal structures and exudates that alter the relationship

between water and soil (Romell ,1939). The purpose of this investigation was to determine

whether soil water repellency and infiltration are being manipulated through inoculation with

fungi. This ability for fungi to change the ground water repellency and trap soil particles results

in changes to the infiltration dynamics in soil. It appears that individual fungal species have

different capacities to utilize and produce some potentially hydrophobic substances in soil.

The main objective of this dissertation is to explore whether fungi actively alter their

habitat to gain competitive advantage and behave differently when under competition. I

hypothesized that fungi in competition with a different species would produce more extracellular

materials such as EPS and hydrophobias, thereby increasing the development of water

repellency. These impacts will radiate spatially from the growing fungi over time, with effects

not measured until colonies interact directly by hyphal growth. Fungi are thought to be the prime

cause of water repellency in soil. The first scientific study showing this link was over 40 years

ago by Bond (1964) and more recent work has identified the role of individual fungal species.
 DISCUSSION 3

According to the research showed direct link between the presence of MG fungi and the

development of AM. There is a strong relationship between fungal biomass and water repellency

in an agricultural soil. However, this could not be simulated in a study that controlled fungal

biomass with biocides in the laboratory. The area of soil around plant roots, generally referred to

as the rhizosphere, has also been shown to have greater levels of water repellency than bulk soil

(Bachmam et al ,2001)Specific compounds produced by plant roots have been shown to induce

water repellency, but the effects could also be due to microbial secondary metabolites from root

exudates decomposition. The specific objectives of this study are to Study the Spatial and

temporal changes in hydrophobic-hydrophilic interfaces as the fungus grows across substrates

and begin to compete. To measure mainly water sorptivity with a few checks of ethanol

sorptivity. It is hypothesized that the wetting properties of fungi are one of the most important

factors of soil water repellency and that any changes in surface properties of the soil will result in

a change in soil water repellency and infiltration behavior(Dekker et al, 2006). For water

sorptivity, a linear transects between the two inoculation zones, measuring at 1 cm intervals

using a miniature infiltrometer. When it comes ethanol sorptivity, it will not be affected much.

Identify a relationship between the time and severity of soil water repellency.

Soils, the foundation of life for plants, animals and humans, provide an extensive range of

services for the environment, by sustaining agriculture and food production. Furthermore, soils

maintain regulations of the water balance; water, which is stored in soils, serves as a secure

supply for plants (Alanir et al., 2016). Soils act as a filter, therefore, providing high-quality fresh

water. Fungi are known to alter the physical environment of soil to improve competitive

advantage. They also produce surface active compounds to allow hyphae to push through an air-

water interface and allow fruiting bodies to develop. Water content is a major factor that
 DISCUSSION 4

influences soil water repellency. Dry soil is more water repellent, and moist soil is wet. In a wet

soil, water voluntarily penetrates. In comparison, water balls up into spherical droplets on a

repellent soil. In extreme cases, no water infiltrates, irrespective of how long the soil is exposed

to water.

A small degree of soil water repellency is essential for stabilizing soil structure (Tisdall

and Oades, 1982). However, these surface properties will have implications on soil hydrology as

well as soil processes like immobilization of substances and transport within a ground, and

Walsh, Hydrophobicity or water repellency is not a static soil property but follows short-term or

seasonal variations. Where hydrophobicity is linked with fungal or other microbiological

activity, hydrophobicity may increase with soil moisture initially, due to the associated enhanced

biological activity before disappearing as the soil becomes wet. The hydrophilic portions of

fungi to reorient themselves with any changes in water content, leaving primarily the

hydrophobic areas uncovered. Soil water repellency (SWR) has been found the world over in

numerous textures in all dirt surfaces .However, sandy soils are the most powerless to soil water

repellency (Schoene, 1983). The noteworthiness of soil water repellency in connection to

horticultural creation is progressively being perceived as changes in water and atmosphere will

compound the issue extensively

During the research, two types of saprophytic growths were utilized. Fungi are known for

being hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and brisk or moderate developing. Sand from Dublin Woods

was utilized as the dirt medium. The soil tests were air-dried in the shelter for a week. The soil

was separated, and afterwards in this way sieved through a 2 mm strainer to expel any vast

flotsam and jetsam, plant material and roots. If Club in the sand is dried, it gets to be

hydrophobic so the impact of the water content on the infiltrometer perusing was watched and
 DISCUSSION 5

changed likewise. It was then disinfected by twofold autoclaving and put in the split Petri dishes.

Part Petri dishes were being utilized as a part of the investigation, and a little crevice was made

in the divider utilizing a hot surgical tool. The crack was caused to urge the parasites to

associate. Growths were immunized at inverse closures of the split petri dish and after that

permitted to develop. The plates were being brooded in the light at 24-27oc(DeBan, 2002).

At interims of 1, 7, 25, 32, 53 days, water and ethanol sorptivity estimations at diverse

areas up to the crevice were recorded. This uses a small scale infiltrometer to decide soil water

driven properties, for example, soil sorptivity, hydrophobicity and pressure drove conductivity.

The infiltrometer tip had a contact range of 2 mm. The measure of fluid entering the dirt was

measured by recording the weight reduction in a store as an element of time. For Sw, a linear

transect between the two immunizations zones was measured at 1 cm interims. Twofold clean

water (ddH2O) was utilized as a part of the infiltrometer. Ten areas were chosen in each of the

duplicates. For Se, estimations were taken radically rather with the goal that they are at the same

separation from the parasites, however not covering the area of the water evaluation. It was

accepted that the parasites would not change the pore structure of the dirt, so Se qualities were

evaluated for variability and after that, the mean worth for every treatment and outspread

separation was utilised to figure water repellency.

In the wake of autoclaving, soils were rewetted to 0.05 g-1 moisture content.Generally,

ufficiently dry to take into consideration water invasion from the infiltrometer that is set to mm

water strain. The aim here was to regulate the soil moisture. The following is the outline of the

experiment .Mycena galopus is an unpalatable type of parasite. This saprobic growth a leaf litter

decomposes; it uses all the significant constituents of plant litter. It is particularly capable of

assaulting cellulose and lignin, the last of which is the second most bottomless renewable natural
 DISCUSSION 6

compound in the biosphere. The mushroom latex contains chemicals called benzoxepines, which

are thought to assume a part in an injury initiated substance protection component against yeasts

and parasitic organisms (Watson et al., 1970).

During Sub culturing micro-organisms there is exchanging microorganisms starting with

one development compartment then onto the next, furnishing the organisms with a fresh supply

of supplements on a powerful or fluid medium. Sub refined empowers the examiner to change

the parameters of a microorganism's living space, for example, its temperature and physical

environment, to get data utilized as a part of animal groups distinguishing proof. Understanding

where a microbial society lives or bites the dust secludes its strain. In a few occasions, a

microbial culture can be identified in light of the time span required for new development to

show up after the subculture exchange. Petri dishes with agar, a coagulated substance produced

using ocean growth, are utilized as a secure domain to develop microorganisms. At the point

when a fluid situation is required, a counterfeit supplement stock is employed (Ritsema,

2003).Cultures with blended microorganisms that are developed in soup should be sub cultured

onto a big media to disengage provinces for exact ID.

Once on the agar surface, every organism state speaks to only types of microorganism,

starting from the augmentation of an isolated cell. This characterized and segregated state is

known as a pure culture and is a critical beginning stage in microbiological research. Mycena

gallops is a saprobic creature, and accept a significant role in timberland organic groups as a

decomposer of leaf litter This parasite atmospheres soil minerals, making them more open to

mycorrhizal plants. Phosphorus, primary macronutrient affecting plant advancement, customarily

happens in essential minerals like apatite or other regular structures, and its level dissolvability

much of the time realizes low phosphorus availability in soil.

 DISCUSSION 7

The natural activity of M. galopus mycelium can fabricate the openness of phosphorus

and different supplements, both as a delayed consequence of soil maturation in light of action

uptake and by the method for the entry of weathering administrators such little sub-nuclear mass

standard acids. Studies have exhibited that the parasite is sensitive to low mergings of sulphate

(SO32−), a reaction of sulphur dioxide tainting, recommending that this pollution can be deadly

to the improvement of the development of biologically noteworthy core interests. Armillaria

Melle growth in the variety Armillaria. It is a plant pathogen and part of an enigmatic animal

groups compound of firmly related and morphologically comparative species. It causes

Armillaria root decay in numerous plant species and produces mushrooms around the base of

trees it has contaminated. The side effects of disease show up in the crowns of infected trees as

stained foliage, decreased development, dieback of the branches and demise. Miniaturised scale

life forms are developed or refined on powerful medium, for instance, agar plates.Subculturing

deals with transferring of micro-organisms to fresh medium in this case malt extract agar on to

sand. The freshly inoculated medium is then incubated at the temperature optimum for growing

the fungus. Aseptic technique was used to minimize the risk of contamination. Heating sterilizes

metal instruments such used to transfer the fungi till red hot in the blue part of the Bunsen flame.

This process is carried out before and after use to destroy any fungal spores which might cause

contamination.

Cultures of Armillaria Melle(AM) and Mycena gallops (AM)were kept up on Calvin sand

blended with remove malt agar (50g Malt extricate agar in 1 L pure H2O) at 22.5-23oC (room

temperature) in a hatchery. The organisms were from a dynamic developing society and

immunized on Culbin sand blended with supplements. A standout amongst the most critical

elements of the vegetative part of the Armillaria mellea life cycle is securing a domain. This
 DISCUSSION 8

promises the organism access to supplement sources inside it and additionally carbon.

Additionally, the diffuse aficionados of A. smelled get to be solidified into lines at a separation a

few centimeters behind the developing mycelial front. The hyphae are in a favored position and

are for the most part is known for its exceptional rivalry Mycena gallops is surely understood to

assault all the significant constituents of plant litter which incorporates hemicelluloses, lignin

and dissolvable sugars. It is likewise ready to out-compete other growths much more quickly

developing species when under rivalry on immaculate societies. The transient nature of water

repellency brought about by hydrophilic what's more, hydrophilic-surface holding amid drying

links between hydrophobic mixes in soil and the improvement of water repellency have not been

persuading. While it should be recognized that more noteworthy plenitude of high nuclear polar

mixes in water repellent soils, adding these mixes to wettable soils did not as a matter, of course,

incite repellency (care et al, 2003. There is developing enthusiasm for the compound glomalin in

soil science as its highly adhesive and hydrophobic properties are structure soundness as it may;

work by Feeney et al. (2004) demonstrated that it was ineffectively identified with water

repellency. Utilizing Diffuse-Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform (DRIFT) Spectroscopy to

distinguish hydrophobic mixes in soil. Again, links between DRIFT and actual measurement ts

of water repellency are unconvincing Although significant advances are been made in the

previous ten years in understanding the effect of hydrophobic natural mixes on water repellency,

there is still a much add up to be learnt. Of specific significance is the collaboration between

surface scope and the hydration status of natural combinations (Doerr et al., 2000).Current

exploration examining the science of hydrophobic mixes in the soil will likewise help to see

impressively of specific helpfulness is related examination from modern natural chemistry which
 DISCUSSION 9

has detected exceedingly surface dynamic hydrophobias delivered by parasites that presumably

assume an overwhelming part in the water repellency of soil.

Amelioration of Water Repellency

Physical, biological and chemical exist to improve soil water repellency. In the endless locales of

south-eastern Australia, which have large regions of fruitless soils incapable of holding water for

a significant part of the year, agriculturists have attempted a scope of options. A possible natural

arrangement is to expand populaces of wax-debasing microbes that consume hydrophobic mixes

(Roper et al., 2006).Tillage of soil is a concrete solution as the abrasion of particles by farm

implements can remove hydrophobic coatings from soil surfaces. It is also possible to increase

the surface area of soil by adding clay as an amelioration strategy although the costs are

prohibitive without a local source of clay. Wetting specialists give the quickest answer for

fighting water repellency and safe water soils they have been appeared to impact sly affect crop

yield and quality. Early research has discovered persuading positive effects of wetting specialists

on hydraulic properties of agricultural soils which are supported by considerable exploration on

sandy enhancement soils.

At present, there are numerous wetting administrators advanced especially for soil

oversees meant. Some of these blends are chemicals that change the surface weight of watering

framework water, usually with momentary constructive outcomes (Ritsema, 2003). More

complicated wetting administrators used as a piece of irrigated potatoes have extended yields by

up to 20% and upgraded tuber quality and no doubt have longer-term beneficial outcomes on

overall yield quality. Before the across the board determination of wetting specialists is

energized, the wider environmental ramifications of taking out repellency should be assessed.
 DISCUSSION 10

Hydrophobicity is critical to the auxiliary soundness of soils .so enhanced water uptake taking

after the use of a wetting agent may come about in greater slaking of soil. Be that as it may, if

wetting operators forestall drying of the soil, they may reduce the degree of slaking hassles. The

particular stream is upgraded by repellency and expansions draining of agrochemicals to

groundwater. Erosion is also improved by the repellency of surface soils (Buzko et al., 2006).

Wetting agent may, therefore, later affect concoction filtering and erosion. Although wetting

operators may enhance water penetration and maintenance, they may also increase the measure

of vanishing from the uncovered soil. Provide direct proof of less vanishing from water repellent

soils.

Given that water repellency diminishes with depth a more hydrophobic layer of soil at

the surface could shape a little hindrance that decreases evaporation. Research is needed to

examine the potential ramifications to water spending plans if wetting agents are connected and

whether a thin hydrophobic barrier at the soil surface could be a viable technique to decrease

general dissipation. It is likely that enhanced water distribution with wetting specialists and

diminished particular stream, would more than offset any adverse effect from vanishing, yet it

would be worth examination summing it all contagious rivalry may result in different soil

physical reactions as talked about in this discussion(Watson et al., 1970).

 DISCUSSION 11

Reference

Letey, J., Osborn, J. and Pelishek, R.E. (1962) ‘Measurement of liquid-solid contact angles in

soiland sand’, Soil Science, 93(3), pp. 149–153. doi: 10.1097/00010694-196203000-

00001.

Linder, M.B. (2009) ‘Hydrophobins: Proteins that self assemble at interfaces’, Current Opinion

in Colloid & Interface Science, 14(5), pp. 356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2009.04.001.

Olorunfemi, I. (2014) ‘Soil Hydrophobicity: An overview’, Journal of Scientific Research and

Reports, 3(8), pp. 1003–1037. doi: 10.9734/jsrr/2014/7325.

Rankin, P., & Ross, C. (1982). Dry patch- So what's new? Sports Turf Review 139., 61-66.

Rillig, M.C. (2005) ‘A connection between fungal hydrophobins and soil water repellency?’,

Pedobiologia, 49(5), pp. 395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.04.004.

Rillig, M.C., Mardatin, N.F., Leifheit, E.F. and Antunes, P.M. (2010) ‘Mycelium of arbuscular

mycorrhizal fungi increases soil water repellency and is sufficient to maintain water-

stable soil

aggregates’, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42(7), pp. 1189–1191. doi:

10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.03.027.

Newell, K., 1984. Interaction between two decomposer basidiomycetes and a collembolan

under Sitka spruce: distribution, abundance and selective grazing. Soil Biology and

Biochemistry, 16(3), pp.227-233.

 DISCUSSION 12

Hiscox, J., Savoury, M., Johnston, S.R., Parfitt, D., Müller, C.T., Rogers, H.J. and Boddy, L.,

2016. Location, location, location: priority effects in wood decay communities may vary

between sites. Environmental microbiology.

Dighton, J., 2016. Fungi in ecosystem processes (Vol. 31). CRC Press.

Peyret-Guzzon, M., Stockinger, H., Bouffaud, M.L., Farcy, P., Wipf, D. and Redecker, D.,

2016. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities and Rhizophagus irregularis

populations shift in response to short-term ploughing and fertilisation in a buffer strip.

Mycorrhiza, 26(1), pp.33-46.

Bárcenas-Moreno, G., García-Orenes, F., Mataix-Solera, J. and Mataix-Beneyto, J., 2016.

Plant community influence on soil microbial response after a wildfire in Sierra Nevada

National Park (Spain). Science of The Total Environment.

Barreiro, A., Bååth, E. and Díaz-Raviña, M., 2016. Bacterial and fungal growth in burnt acid

soils amended with different high C/N mulch materials. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,

97, pp.102-111.

Cozzolino, V., Di Meo, V., Monda, H., Spaccini, R. and Piccolo, A., 2016. The molecular

characteristics of compost affect plant growth, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and soil

microbial community composition. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 52(1), pp.15-29.

Alanís, N., Hernández‐Madrigal, V.M., Cerdà, A., Muñoz‐Rojas, M., Zavala, L.M. and Jordán,

A., 2016. Spatial gradients of intensity and persistence of soil water repellency under

different forest types in central mexico. Land Degradation & Development.

Bachmann J, Horton R, van der Ploeg RR 2001. Isothermal and nonisothermal

 DISCUSSION 13

evaporation from four sandy soils of different water repellency. Soil Sci. Soc. J. 65:

1599-1607.

Bond RD 1964. The influence of the microflora on the physical properties of soils. II

Field studies on water repellent sands. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2: 123-131.

bu-Zreig M, Rudra RP, Dickinson WT 2003, Effect of application of surfactants on

hydraulic properties of soils, Biosys. Eng. 84: 363-372.

Buczko U, Bens O, Huttl RE 2006. Tillage effects on hydraulic properties and

macroporosity in silty and sandy soils. Soil Sci. Soc. J. 70: 1998-2007.

Capriel P 1997. Hydrophobicity of organic matter in arable soils: influence of

management Eur. J. Soil Sci. 48: 457-462.

Cisar JL Williams KE Vivas HE, Haydu JJ 2000. The occurrence and alleviation by

surfactants of soil-water repellency on sand-based turfgrass systems. J. Hydrol. 231:

352-358.

Clothier BE, Vogeler I, Magesan GN 2000. The breakdown of water repellency and

solute transport through a hydrophobic soil. J. Hydrol. 231-232: 255-264.

Crabtree WL, Henderson CWL 1999. Furrows, press wheels and wetting agents

improve crop emergence and yield on water repellent soils. Plant Soil 214: 1-8.
 DISCUSSION 14

Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals (ISAA2007)

6-9 August 2007

Publisher: International Society for Agrochemical Adjuvants (ISAA) Columbus, Ohio, USA

Editor: RE Gaskin

Produced by: Hand Multimedia, Christchurch, New Zealand ISBN 978-0-473-12388-8

Czarnes S, Hallett PD, Bengough AG, Young IM 2000. Root- and microbial-derived

mucilages affect soil structure and water transport. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51: 435-443.

DeBano LF 2000. Water repellency in soils: a historical overview. J. Hydrol. 231: 4-32.

Dekker LW, Doerr SH, Oostindie K, Ziogas AK, Ritsema CJ 2001. Water repellency

and critical soil water content in a dune sand. Soil Sci. Soc. J. 65: 1667-1674.

Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Boersma OH 1998. Effect of drying temperature

on the severity of soil water repellency. Soil Sci. 163: 780-796.

Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ 2006. Occurrence prediction and

hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid

temperate climate. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57: 741-754.

Ritsema, C.J., and L.W. Dekker. 2003. Soil water repellency: Occurrence, consequences, and

amelioration. Elsevier Science.

 DISCUSSION 15

Romell, L.-G. (1939) ‘The ecological problem of Mycotrophy’, Ecology, 20(2), pp. 163–167.

doi:10.2307/1930737.

Roper, M. (2006) ‘Potential for remediation of water repellent soils by inoculation with

waxdegrading bacteria in south-western Australia’, Biologia, 61(19). doi:

10.2478/s11756-006-0189-3.

Schoener, T.W. (1983) ‘Field experiments on Interspecific competition’, American Naturalist,

The, 122(2), p. 240. doi: 10.1086/284133.

Tisdall, J.M. and Oades, J.M. (1982) ‘Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils’,

Journal of Soil Science, 33(2), pp. 141–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x.

Watson, C.L. and Letey, J. (1970) ‘Indices for characterising soil-water Repellency based upon

contact angle-surface tension relationships1’, Soil Science Society of America Journal,

34(6), p. 841. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400060011x.