Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructions Part 2 Writing CAE PDF
Instructions Part 2 Writing CAE PDF
Teacher’s notes
Procedure
1. Ask students, in pairs, to complete the Key Facts in Exercise 1. They should use the
Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) Handbook to check the information.
2. Check the answers with the whole class. Ask if there are any other questions about Part 2;
you could look through the Writing section of the Handbook to see if there are any points
there you would like to raise with your class.
3. Ask students when people usually write a report (in order to give feedback on something
such as a language course or a new coursebook). Ask students to read the Part 2 question
very carefully, and discuss with a partner what they have to do to answer the question. Ask
students to complete the table in Exercise 2.
4. Check the answers with the whole class (see key). Emphasise the importance of answering
the specific points in the question, writing in an appropriate format and style, and keeping to
the word limit.
5. Ask students to read the sample answer (see Exercise 3) and to underline the parts where
they find the answers to the question.
6. Check the answers. Use this sample answer as a model for writing reports.
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Suggested follow-up activity
If you want to look at the sample task in more depth, you could get students to look through the
examiner comments and say whether they agree with them or not.
You could then do an error correction exercise and ask the students to look for and correct the
errors in the sample question (as language accuracy is what needs work in this answer).
Get students to write their own report to answer the questions. Exchange with a partner and get
students to think about whether the answer has covered all the content points, what examiner
comments they would give, etc.
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) Writing Part 2 – answer keys
Key facts:
Candidates will be expected to show awareness of the style and tone required by a task, and must
be prepared to demonstrate appropriate use of two or more of the following functions as specified in
the task: describing, evaluating, hypothesising, persuading, expressing opinions, comparing, giving
advice, justifying and judging priorities.
Candidates must write 220–260 words.
Exercise 2
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Exercise 3
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the efficiency of the three week study and work
programme. It is based on my personal experience, which I received while taking part in the
aforementioned programme.
General findings
The programme as a whole was very engaging and helpful. As it took place in the language
environment, many aspects of the English-language, which will not be taught in the class room,
could be learned through the programme.
Issues
No issues can be raised about the work part of the programme. However the English classes that
take place in the morning offer no substantial benefit over classes taken in my home country, even if
they are taught by a native speaker.
Suggestions
Firstly the organiser of the programme should increase the amount of time, that is spent working
during the programme and reduce the amount of classes taken. Moreover the organiser should
keep finding more companies with which to cooperate, to make the programme attractive to more
people with different interests. (251 words)
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) Writing Part 2 – Student’s worksheet
Exercise 1: Key facts for Writing Part 2
Working in pairs, complete the Key facts below. The first word of each answer is given and each _
represents one letter. Use the Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) Handbook to check the
information.
Key facts:
Candidates will be expected to show awareness of the s_ _ _ _ and t_ _ _ required by a task, and
must be prepared to demonstrate appropriate use of two or more of the following functions as
specified in the task: describing, e_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, hypothesising, persuading, expressing o_ _ _ _
_ _ _, comparing, giving a_ _ _ _ _, justifying and judging priorities.
Candidates must write _ _ _ – _ _ _ words.
Look at the Part 2 question below and complete the writing plan.
Writing plan
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Part 2
You have just finished a three-week study and work programme in an English-speaking country.
You studied English language in the mornings and worked for a local company in the afternoons.
The programme organiser has asked you to write a report about your experience. In your report,
you should evaluate the programme, explaining which part of the programme was more useful, and
suggest changes you would recommend for next year’s programme.
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Exercise 3: Sample answer
Now read the sample answer and underline the information that was asked for. In this way you can
check to make sure the question has been answered.
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the efficiency of the three week study and work
programme. It is based on my personal experience, which I received while taking part in the
aforementioned programme.
General findings
The programme as a whole was very engaging and helpful. As it took place in the language
environment, many aspects of the English-language, which will not be taught in the class room,
could be learned through the programme.
Issues
No issues can be raised about the work part of the programme. However the English classes that
take place in the morning offer no substantial benefit over classes taken in my home country, even if
they are taught by a native speaker.
Suggestions
Firstly the organiser of the programme should increase the amount of time, that is spent working
during the programme and reduce the amount of classes taken. Moreover the organiser should
keep finding more companies with which to cooperate, to make the programme attractive to more
people with different interests.
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions
Examiner comments
Organisation 4 The text is a well-organised and coherent whole. Good use is made
of appropriate organisational patterns for the genre in terms of
layout, such as sub-headings and the order of information, with
general points being mentioned before specific ones.
A variety of cohesive devices, relative clauses and referencing are
used to connect the ideas across and within sentences (While
working for a company I learned ...; ... which makes the
programme). The structure of the report overall is clear and logical.
© UCLES 2014. For further information see our Terms and Conditions