Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0891842202000046 Main
1 s2.0 S0891842202000046 Main
Imaging technique
The ankle and hindfoot are imaged with an extremity surface coil, with the
patient supine and the ankle in neutral position or mild plantar flexion. Imaging is
* Department of Radiology, Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90007, USA.
E-mail address: Rkerr@laoh.ucla.edu (R. Kerr).
0891-8422/02/$ – see front matter D 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 8 9 1 - 8 4 2 2 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 0 4 - 6
286 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
Ligament injury
Most ankle injuries occur with forced plantar flexion and inversion, resulting
in injury to the lateral ankle ligaments. The anterior talofibular ligament is
weakest, and is torn first and most frequently (Fig. 1). As the force of injury
increases, the calcaneofibular ligament and the posterior talofibular ligament are
torn in sequence. MR signs of acute ligament tear include ligament discontinuity,
detachment, attenuation or thickening, intraligamentous increased signal intensity
on T2-weighted images, and extravasation of joint fluid beyond the normal
confines of the involved ligament. A chronically torn ligament may appear
attenuated or elongated and wavy, reveal diffuse or nodular thickening, or be
Fig. 1. Normal anterior talofibular ligament. On an axial T2-weighted image, the normal anterior
talofibular ligament appears as a well-defined, low signal intensity band (arrow).
R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307 287
obscured by fibrous tissue or synovial proliferation (Fig. 2). The anterior and
posterior talofibular ligaments are best evaluated in the axial plane. The
calcaneofibular ligament may require both axial and coronal images to be
adequately demonstrated.
The anterior and posterior tibiofibular ligaments are usually torn in asso-
ciation with disruption of the interosseous membrane (syndesmosis injury), and
medial malleolar or fibular fractures. These ligaments have an oblique course,
and may normally appear discontinuous on axial MR images. Ligament
continuity may be inferred by viewing consecutive axial images. When torn,
these ligaments appear thickened, distorted, nodular, or grossly discontinuous.
Following syndesmosis injury, the interosseous membrane may undergo heter-
Fig. 2. Chronic partial tear of the anterior talofibular ligament. On an axial T2-weighted image the
ligament is diffusely thickened (arrows).
288 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
otopic ossification that may be painful. On MRI, this may be confused with a
mass lesion (Fig. 3). Symptoms may be relieved by excision of this region of
ossification [2].
If primary surgical repair is being contemplated after an acute ankle sprain,
MRI may be used to document the extent of ligament injury. In patients with
chronic ankle pain or instability, MRI may be useful for assessing the ankle
ligaments and detecting associated lesions, such as an osteochondral fracture or
tendon abnormalities. MRI is limited in predicting the clinical outcome after
ankle sprain. There is a tendency toward a better outcome with partial anterior
talofibular ligament tear and an uninjured peroneal tendon sheath [3]. In one
Fig. 3 (continued ).
Anterolateral impingement
The anterolateral compartment is a space enclosed by the anterolateral aspect
of the talus and tibia, the anteromedial aspect of the fibula, and the anterior
tibiofibular, anterior talofibular, and calcaneofibular ligaments. Anterolateral
impingement is a syndrome that is usually seen after one or more ankle sprains.
It is produced by synovial hypertrophy, fibrotic scarring or, less commonly, an
accessory fascicle of the anteroinferior tibiofibular ligament. When this tissue is
present within the anterolateral gutter of the ankle, it may become entrapped
290 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
within the joint during dorsiflexion. Patients present with pain, swelling, limited
dorsiflexion, subjective instability, or weakness. Arthroscopic debridement and
partial synovectomy usually produce good or excellent results. Soft tissue
encroachment upon the anterolateral gutter is best seen on axial MR images
(Fig. 4). The reliability of MRI in achieving this diagnosis, however, has not been
established. Soft tissue fullness within the lateral gutter, without an associated
joint effusion, was an accurate indicator of this disorder in one study [5], yet
unreliable in another [6]. Other investigators concluded that the diagnosis may be
suggested when fluid in the lateral gutter outlines an abnormal soft tissue
structure separate from the anterior talofibular ligament (see Fig. 2) [7].
Fig. 5. Osteochondral lesion. A sagittal inversion recovery image reveals a partially cystic
osteochondral lesion of the medial aspect of the talar dome (large arrow). The overlying subchondral
cortical bone is slightly flattened and of decreased thickness (small arrows).
292 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
Fig. 6. Magic angle effect. On a sagittal T1-weighted image the peroneus brevis tendon (arrows) reveals
intermediate signal intensity. Compare to the low signal intensity of the peroneus longus tendon (PL).
R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307 293
Fig. 7. Longitudinal split tear of peroneus brevis tendon. On an axial T1-weighted image, the split,
partially torn peroneus brevis tendon (curved black arrows) is medial and lateral to an intact peroneus
longus tendon (open arrow).
courses around the peroneal tubercle of the calcaneus and, within the midfoot,
under the cuboid bone (Fig. 8). Tears of this tendon at the midfoot often produce
non-specific symptoms and are underdiagnosed [14]. Factors predisposing to
lateral dislocation of the peroneal tendons include a flat or convex retromalleolar
groove, a torn or absent superior peroneal retinaculum, and a stretched
retinaculum, due to a low-lying PB muscle or an accessory peroneus quartus
muscle. Lateral dislocation may only occur in certain positions and require
dynamic MRI, obtained with varied degrees of plantar- and dorsiflexion, for
diagnosis. A radiographic clue to traumatic dislocation of the peroneal tendons
is a flake-like fracture off the posterior border of the lateral malleolus, due to
avulsion by the superior peroneal retinaculum. Stenosing tenosynovitis of the
294 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
Fig. 8. Partial tear of peroneus longus tendon. On a coronal T1-weighted image, the peroneus longus
tendon is enlarged and deformed (arrows) when viewed in cross-section as it courses inferior to the
cuboid; pb = peroneus brevis tendon; C = cuboid bone.
sinus tarsi syndrome. Tendinosis and partial and complete tears usually occur
where the tendon courses around the medial malleolus, and may be clinically
indistinguishable [15]. Athletes tend to present with tenosynovitis secondary
to overuse.
On MRI, the PTT is best assessed in cross-section on axial or axial-oblique
images [16]. It is normally twice the width of the adjacent flexor digitorum
longus tendon, and slightly smaller than the combined width of the peroneus
brevis and longus tendons. This tendon increases in diameter, and is of
intermediate, rather than low, signal intensity as it approaches its principal
insertion on the navicular tuberosity. With tenosynovitis, MRI reveals a
normal tendon surrounded by a moderate amount of fluid within the tendon
sheath. With partial tear, the tendon may be of increased or decreased
diameter, with variable intratendinous increased signal intensity (Fig. 9).
Avulsion of this tendon from its navicular insertion may be difficult to detect
with MRI, especially if chronic, because this portion of the tendon normally
increases in size and signal intensity. The presence of edema or hemorrhage
should lead to the correct diagnosis. When completely torn, the tendon is
absent, due to proximal and distal retraction of the torn ends. MRI accurately
demonstrates the extent of tear, and aids the surgeon in choosing between the
various surgical options [17]. The plantar calcaneonavicular or spring ligament
is an additional stabilizer of the longitudinal arch that should be evaluated on
MRI in patients with PTT dysfunction.
Fig. 9. Chronic posterior tibial tendon tear. On an axial T2-weighted image, the partially torn tendon is
enlarged (black arrow) as it extends into the hindfoot and is surrounded by a high signal intensity
tenosynovial effusion (open arrow).
296 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
Fig. 10. Flexor hallucis longus tenosynovitis. On an axial T2-weighted image, a large fluid collection
(black arrow) surrounds the flexor hallucis longus muscle and tendon (white arrow). There was no
tibiotalar joint effusion; M = medial malleolus, F = fibula.
R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307 297
may reveal fusiform or diffuse tendon enlargement, with normal signal intensity
or linear or globular foci of increased intratendinous signal intensity.
With a complete tear, the tendon is discontinuous, with frayed, irregular ends,
intratendinous and peritendinous signal abnormality, and sometimes tendon
retraction. The diagnosis of complete tear is best accomplished with axial
T2-weighted images. A small, intact plantaris tendon, medial to the Achilles
tendon, should not be confused with intact Achilles fibers (Fig. 12).
Insertional Achilles tendon abnormalities are usually due to repetitive over-
use or inflammatory arthritis. On MRI, insertional tendinosis is characterized
by one or more of the following abnormalities: intratendinous increased signal
intensity on T2-weighted images, with variable tendon enlargement; an
enlarged, fluid-filled retrocalcaneal bursa; superficial Achilles bursal fluid/
Fig. 11. Achilles peritendinitis. A sagittal fat-saturated T2-weighted image reveals extensive edema
(arrows) of the pre-Achilles fat pad.
R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307 299
Fig. 12. Achilles tendon rupture. On a coronal inversion recovery image, high signal intensity fluid
fills the tendon defect (large arrows). The intact plantaris tendon (small arrows) is medial to the
disrupted Achilles tendon.
300 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
Fig. 13. Accessory soleus muscle. On an axial T1-weighted image there is a bilobed mass with the signal
characteristics of muscle (arrows) within the pre-Achilles fat pad; fhl = flexor hallucis longus tendon.
Fig. 14. Pigmented villonodular synovitis. A sagittal T1-weighted image reveals multiple lobulated,
intermediate-to-low signal intensity masses about the tibiotalar and posterior talocalcaneal joints and
within the tarsal canal (arrows).
foot, it most often involves the first two toes [26]. There may be pressure erosion
in the underlying bone. The diffuse form of giant cell tumor of tendon sheath
tends to be larger, with an irregular, infiltrating appearance. On MRI, this lesion
reveals intermediate to low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images
(Fig. 15). The extent of low signal intensity within the mass is proportional to the
hemosiderin content.
Synovial osteochondromatosis is an unusual cause of ankle pain, as it most
frequently affects the knee, elbow, hip, and shoulder. It represents chondroid
metaplasia of synovium, and may arise within a joint, bursa, or tendon sheath.
Synovectomy is the treatment of choice. The appearance on MRI varies,
depending on the age of the lesion. The signal intensity of uncalcified
chondroid bodies is intermediate on T1-weighted images, and intermediate to
high on T2-weighted images. Calcified or ossified lesions reveal low signal
intensity. A mature osteocartilaginous body may contain marrow and dem-
onstrate the signal characteristics of fat with a thin, peripheral rim of low signal
intensity bone.
Fig. 15. Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. A sagittal T2-weighted image reveals a low signal intensity,
soft tissue mass (large arrows) inferior to the flexor hallucis longus tendon (small arrows) as it courses
under the sustentaculum tali.
aspects of the foot and toes. The heel is usually spared, due to lack of impinge-
ment upon the medial calcaneal branch of the posterior tibial nerve. Muscle
weakness is a late, infrequent sign. Electrodiagnostic studies may be negative and
cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis.
On MRI, the tarsal tunnel is best evaluated in the axial plane. Nerve
entrapment or displacement may be caused by a variety of space-occupying
lesions, including neoplasms, ganglion cysts, and accessory or hypertrophied
muscles, as well as fracture deformity and post-traumatic fibrosis (Fig. 16). MRI
is particularly well-suited to evaluating this disorder, because the inciting lesion
often cannot be localized by the clinical findings [27]. It is useful in selecting
patients for surgery, as the best results are obtained in patients with mass lesions
304 R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307
Fig. 16. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. An axial T2-weighted image reveals a high signal intensity ganglion
cyst (arrow) within the tarsal tunnel, laterally displacing the medial (mp) and lateral (lp) plantar
nerves; T = talus, F= fibula.
Fig. 17. Sinus tarsi syndrome associated with ganglion cyst. An axial fat-saturated, T2-weighted image
reveals a lobulated, partially septated fluid collection (arrows) within the sinus tarsi, extending into the
lateral soft tissue; C = calcaneus, T = talus.
predilection to arise within the lower extremity, including the ankle region. It
typically occurs in young adults and often has an unfavorable prognosis.
Clinically, it may be mistaken for a benign process, due to a slow growth rate.
On MRI, synovial sarcoma usually reveals a heterogeneous pattern of signal
intensities, especially when it is greater than 5 cm in diameter. Smaller lesions
may have a non-specific appearance of intermediate signal intensity on T-1
weighted images, and intermediate to high signal intensity on T2-weighted
images [31].
Because of its excellent soft tissue contrast, MRI is useful for lesion detection
and assists surgical planning by documenting the extent of a mass lesion. For
example, on MRI, ganglion cysts often reveal small serpiginous extensions that
must be excised in order to avoid post-operative recurrence. Certain tumors or
tumor-like processes have a unique radiographic and MRI appearance that
allows accurate diagnosis [32]. Often, however, the benign or malignant nature
of a soft tissue mass cannot be predicted based on its appearance on MRI.
Summary
In summary, MRI has become the dominant imaging modality for assessing
soft tissue disorders of the ankle. It is useful in evaluating patients with acute or
chronic ankle pain or instability, and for diagnosis and staging of soft tissue mass
lesions. MRI often provides information that is essential to treatment planning of
a variety of traumatic, degenerative, and neoplastic lesions.
References
[1] Anzilotti K, Schweitzer ME, Hecht P, et al. Effect of foot and ankle MR imaging on clinical
decision making. Radiology 1996;201:515 – 7.
[2] Veltri DM, Pagnani MJ, O’Brien SJ, et al. Symptomatic ossification of the tibiofibular syndes-
mosis in professional football players: a sequela of the syndesmotic ankle sprain. Foot Ankle
1995;16:285 – 90.
[3] Zanetti M, DeSimoni C, Wetz HH, et al. MR imaging of injuries to the ankle joint: can it predict
clinical outcome? Skeletal Radiol 1997;26:82 – 8.
[4] Chandnani VP, Harper MT, Ficke JR, et al. Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR
arthrography, MR imaging and stress radiography. Radiology 1994;192:189 – 94.
[5] Jordan LK, Helms CA, Cooperman AE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in antero-
lateral impingement of the ankle. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29:34 – 9.
[6] Farooki S, Yao L, Seeger LL. Anterolateral impingement of the ankle: effectiveness of MR
imaging. Radiology 1998;207:357 – 60.
[7] Rubin DA, Tishkoff NW, Britton CA, et al. Anterolateral soft tissue impingement in the ankle:
diagnosis using MR imaging. AJR 1997;169:829 – 35.
[8] Anderson IP, Crichton KJ, Grattan-Smith T, et al. Osteochondral fractures of the dome of the
talus. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71A:1143 – 52.
[9] Magee TH, Hinson GW. Usefulness of MR imaging in the detection of talar dome injuries. AJR
1998;170:1227 – 30.
[10] Alexander AH, Lichtman DM. Surgical treatment of transchondral talar dome fractures (osteo-
chondritis dissecans). J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62A:646 – 52.
R. Kerr / Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19 (2002) 285–307 307
[11] Khoury NJ, El-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, et al. Peroneus longus and brevis tendon tears: MR
imaging evaluation. Radiology 1996;200:833 – 41.
[12] Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Cheung YY, et al. MR features of longitudinal tears of the peroneus
brevis tendon. AJR 1997;168:141 – 7.
[13] Erickson SJ, Cox IH, Hyde JS, et al. Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity:
a manifestation of the ‘‘magic angle’’ phenomenon. Radiology 1991;181:389 – 92.
[14] Rademaker J, Rosenberg ZS, Delfaut EM, et al. Tear of the peroneus longus tendon: MR imaging
features in nine patients. Radiology 2000;214:700 – 4.
[15] Funk DA, Cass JR, Johnson KA. Acquired adult flat foot secondary to posterior tibial tendon
pathology. J Bone Joint Surg 1986;68A:95 – 102.
[16] Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the posterior tibial tendon. AJR
2000;175:627 – 35.
[17] Conti S, Michelson J, Jahss M. Clinical significance of MRI in preoperative planning for
reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle 1992;13:208 – 14.
[18] Kannus PA, Jozsa L. Histopathologicl changes preceding spontaneous tendon rupture. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 1991;73A:1507 – 25.
[19] Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Pihlajamaki HK, et al. MRI during healing of surgically repaired
Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:164 – 71.
[20] Haims AH, Schweitzer ME, Patel RS, et al. MR imaging of the Achilles tendon: overlap of
findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29:640 – 5.
[21] Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. AJR 2000;
175:613 – 25.
[22] Karjalainen PT, Soila K, Aronen HJ, et al. MR imaging of overuse injuries of the Achilles
tendon. AJR 2000;175:251 – 60.
[23] Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, Roederer G. MR imaging of Achilles tendon in patients with familial
hyperlipidemia. AJR 1995;164:403 – 7.
[24] Buschmann WR, Cheung Y, Jahss MH. Magnetic resonance imaging of anomalous leg muscles:
accessory soleus, peroneus quartus and the flexor digitorum longus accessorius. Foot Ankle
1991;12:109 – 16.
[25] Lin J, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA, et al. Pigmented villonodular synovitis and related lesions: the
spectrum of imaging findings. AJR 1999;172:191 – 7.
[26] Ushijima M, Hashimoto H, Tsuneyoshi M, et al. Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (nodular
tenosynovitis). A study of 207 cases to compare the large joint group with the common digit
group. Cancer 1986;57:875 – 84.
[27] Kerr R, Frey C. MR imaging in tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;
15:280 – 6.
[28] Pfeiffer WH, Cracchiolo A. Clinical results after tarsal tunnel decompression. J Bone Joint Surg
1994;76A:1222 – 30.
[29] Anderson MW, Kaplan PA, Dussault RG, et al. Association of posterior tibial tendon abnormal-
ities with abnormal signal intensity in the sinus tarsi on MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2000;
29:514 – 9.
[30] Klein MA, Spreitzer AM. MR imaging of the tarsal sinus and canal: normal anatomy, pathologic
findings, and features of the sinus tarsi syndrome. Radiology 1993;186:233 – 40.
[31] Jones BC, Sundaram M, Kransdorf MJ. Synovial sarcoma: MR imaging findings in 34 patients.
AJR 1993;161:827 – 30.
[32] Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue masses: a current perspective.
AJR 2000;175:575 – 87.