PROJECT :

CLIENT :
JOB NO. : DATE :
Sheet Pile Wall Design Based on 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC / ACI 318-19
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
HEIGHT OF CANTILEVER Hcant = 10 ft
SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 500 psf
ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL-BEARING PRESSURE IN EMBEDMENT
Pp = 300 psf / ft
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 35 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE = 450 psf / ft (for Hcant > 12 ft only)

SOIL SPECIFIC WEIGHT gb = 110 pcf

CONCRETE STRENGTH fc ' = 4 ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 44 in
PILE SPACING S = 4.0333 ft, o.c.
PILE VERT. REINF. 16 # 11
LATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 6 @ 8 in o.c.

THE SHORING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

( Hembd = 20.51 ft. Min. Req'D)

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE PILE SECTION FORCES AT CANTILEVER BOTTOM
Hb = 0.5 S Pa (Hcant)2 = 7.06 kips, ASD
Hs = ws S Pa (Hcant) / gb = 6.42 kips, ASD
HE = 0.5 S PE (Hcant) =
2
90.75 kips, ASD
P = S D ws + 0.25 p gc D Hcant =
2
23.23 kips, ASD
V = Hb + HE + Hs = 104.23 kips, ASD
M = (Hb /3 + 2HE /3 + Hs /2 ) Hcant = 520.1 ft-kips, ASD

Pu = 1.2 P = 27.88 kips, SD

Vu = 1.6 V = 166.76 kips, SD
Mu = 1.6 M = 832.1 ft-kips, SD

CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS

fc ' = 4 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory]
D= 44 in > MAX[( Hcant + Hembd) / 30 , 12 in] [Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY

      2 
  f C'  2   c     c   , for 0   c   o
e
 fC    o    o  
 '
  e f C , for  c   o


2 ef C
'
 fy  ty , for c
 o  ,  ty  , t  
Ec Es  ty  0.003 ,
'
E c  57 f C , E s  29000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu
 5000

4000
Note:
3000 1. Between compression & tension co
f Pn (k) Transition, which the f should be b
2000
interpolation. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2
1000 2. ACI 318-19 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2
e (22.2.2.4.1) and cu (Fig. R21.2.
0
But AISC 360/341-16 has different
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
e (1.0 or 0.7).
-1000

-2000

Solid Black Line - Tension Controlled f Mn (ft-k)

Solid Red Line - Transition f Mn = 1706 ft-kips @ Pu =
Dash Line - Compression Controlled

CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY

f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) = 312 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
> Vu [Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)
A0 = 1228 in2. Av = 0.88 in2. fy = 60
Vc = 2 (fc') A0 =
0.5
155.4 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) = 261.0 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5.1)
smax = 12 (IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) sprovd = 8
smin = 1
rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = 0.008 < rs,provd = 0.008 [Satisfactory] (ACI 318-19 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

DETERMINE PILE EMBEDMENT LENGTH, Hembd, (IBC 1807.3)

By trials, use pole depth, d = Hembd = 20.51 ft
Lateral bearing @ bottom, S3 = 2 Pp Min( d , 12' ) = 7.20 ksf
Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S1 = 2 Pp Min( d / 3 , 12' ) = 4.10 ksf
Require Depth is given by
A 4.36h 
d 1  1   for nonconstrained 
2 A  20.51 ft [Satisfactory]

Where P=V = 104.23 kips

A= 2.34 P / (D S1) = 16.21
h =M / V = 4.99 ft
 PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

(IBC Table 1808.8.1)

(IBC 1810.3.5.2)
c 
2

  , for 0   c   o  s E s , for  s   ty
o  , fS
 f y , for  s   ty
o
fy  ty , for compression controlled
, t  
Es  ty  0.003 , for tension controlled
000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu  0.003
 (cont'd)

compression & tension controlled is

n, which the f should be by linear
on. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2.2 & Fig. R10.4.2.1)
9 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2b) and keeps
.4.1) and cu (Fig. R21.2.2a) the same.
360/341-16 has different f (0.9 only) and

28 kips > Mu
[Satisfactory]

ksi

in
[Satisfactory]
19 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 0 no P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 104.23 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h= 4.989739 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b= 3.666667 ft h
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.3 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 09 1806.3.4) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> d = 20 ft

Use 3.66666666666667 ft dia x 20.51 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level d

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  d , 12 ' 

LATERAL BEARING @ d/3 : d 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
3 
2.34 P
A
bS 1
A 4.36h 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
REQUIRD DEPTH : 2  A 
d 
 4.25 Ph , FOR CONSTRAINED
 bS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 104.23 k 104.23 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h => 5.0 ft 5.0 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b => 3.67 ft 3.67 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.60 ksf / ft 0.60 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY d1 => 20.00 ft 20.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.00 ksf 4.00 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.63 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.95 ft 9.15 ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY d2=> 20.47 ft 14.57 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.09 ksf 2.91 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.24 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.54 ft 9.15 ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY d3=> 20.51 ft 11.86 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.37 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.12 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.22 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.52 ft 9.20 ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY d4=> 20.51 ft 10.53 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.11 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.32 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.21 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.51 ft 9.77 ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY d5=> 20.51 ft 10.15 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.03 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.09 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.21 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.51 ft 9.95 ft