Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sensor implementation is an important phase in attitude determination. Satellite projects according to CubeSat standards necessitate
miniaturized sensors. When not available in the market, or not affordable, those sensors need to be fabricated. At Universidad Nacional de
Ingeniería, within the development of the one-unit CubeSat picosatellite Chasqui I, a solar cell unit appropriate for attitude estimation of small
satellites has been designed, assembled and tested. This solar cell unit is characterized by the use of COTS components. Importantly, the
electronic design considers the limitations of low-cost components and the requirements of the attitude determination system. Several tests have
been conducted on the solar cell unit in order to determine the relation between solar radiation and solar cell inclination angle.
1. Introduction
The solar cell unit design incorporate two parts: the solar
radiation acquisition and the data handling. The solar radiation
acquisition is responsible for receiving Sun radiation and
converting it to an analog voltage signal, suitable for further
processing. A silicon solar cell, and a current sensor are the
components of this part. The resulting analog voltage
information, proportional to the incident radiation, is sent to a
microcontroller’s A/D converter. Fig. 1. Cosine detector solar cell
1
W/m2, the value of resistor RS is set to 2Ω. 4. Test and results of solar cell unit’s characteristics
2
Fig. 6. Test scenario of Sun sensor unit
Fig. 7. Location of solar cell in the platform - For performance tests of the cells should be
considered to always be a small error in
With the acquired data we proceeded to make the measurement due to the reflection of sunlight on
adjustment cosine solar sensor, for it was found cosine other surfaces in the environment where testing is
graph closest to the data, equation (5), which fits well the conducted, figure 10.
data obtained in the field of view (FOV) of 19 ° to 85 °.
(5)
References
[1] James R. Wertz, S.: Attitude Determination and Control, Members of
the Technical Staff-Attitude Systems Operation-Computer Sciences
Corporation, pp. 156-158.
Fig. 8. Sun sensor output vs. angle of incidence [2] Su-Jeoung Kim, Sun-Ok Kim, Byoung-Young Moon, Young-Keun
Chang, Hwa-Suk Oh, S.: Development of Ultra-Light 2-axes Sun
According to this expression, the maximum error is at 62°, sensor for small satellite, Space System Research Lab, Hankuk
Aviation University.
figure 9 where the difference is the theoretical value of
34.5mV which represents 6% error.
3
[3] Yonatan Winetraub, San Bitan, Yuval Nativ, Dr Anna B. Heller, S.:
Attitude Determination – Advanced Sun Sensors for Pico Satellites,
Handasaim School, Tel-Aviv University.