Petition to the

Inter-American Human Rights Commission

Organization of American States (OAS)
Washington, D.C.

John M. Nagel
v.
the United States of America
July 29, 2014

Page
1
Table of Contents - OAS Human Rights Petition against the United
States of America Filed July 29, 2014
1.
1.1
1.2
2.
2.1
2.2
3.
3.1
4.
4.1
5.
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.
6.1
6.2
7.
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
8.
8.1
8.2
8.3
9.
9.1
10.
10.1
10.2
10.3
11.
11.1

Preface: An American Witness to Obama / CIA Organized Crime Ties

4
Bob Woodward: The President’s Man
6
An Orwellian Deprivation of Civil Rights…An Election Connection?
7
Petition to the Inter-American Human Rights Commission
11
Background of Victim – John M. Nagel
13
Chronology of Human Rights Abuses against Victim
21
Summary: September 25, 2012 – January 26, 2014 21
Electronic Torture Using “Neuroweapons” 21
September 25, 2012
23
An American Banker
23
September 26, 2012
24
Internet Search for the Banker’s Picture
24
“Silent Sound” Communications Begin
24
Kidnapping Threat at U.S. Embassy
25
September 27, 2012
27
The Banker - a Mob Godfather?
27
Torturers “Protecting the President”…An Election Connection?
28
September 28, 2012
29
Victim Undergoes Forced “Socialization” as “Secret Agent”
29
Woodward Discusses Secret “Game-Changing” Iraq Technology
30
Attacks on Broadcasters while on Air Chill Media “Mind Control” Coverage
31
“Mind Reading” Using Subvocalization Recognition
31
DARPA – NASA - Google Patent Subvocalization Recognition Tech
33
September 29 – October 31, 2012
35
Ongoing Threats to Family Members
35
Prominent individuals named during torture sessions
36
Police Complaint Filed Against CIA
37
October 31, 2012 – December 9, 2012
38
Victim Tortured in Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua…
38
December 10, 2012 – December 12, 2012
39
A Public Suicide in Legitimate Protest
39
Victim Seeks Relief, Exposure of U.S. Neuroweapon WMD Use
40
Widespread U.S. Embassy Involvement
41
December 13, 2012 – Date of filing of this Petition
42
Letters to Mexican Congress, Embassies in Mexico
42
Page
2
11.2 Mysterious Death of Victim’s Closest Associate
43
12.
Overview of Development of Psychotronic Weaponry 44
12.1 Neuroweapons More Powerful than Nuclear Bomb
44
12.2 Radio Telepathy a Focus of Neuroscience and the U.S. Military
45
13.
Three Main Components of Neuroweapons
48
14.
Statements by U.S. and multilateral bodies regarding psychotronic
weaponry
49
14.1 U.S. Army Research Lab Confirms Neuroscience Focus
49
14.2 Russia Seeking Neuroweapons
50
14.3 A Microwave Assault on the Honduran President
51
14.4 Additional Electromagnetic Targeting Cases 52
14.5 A Failed Bid to Ban Space-based Mind Weapons
53
14.6 EU Parliament Resolution Calling for a Global Ban on Neuroweapons 53
14.7 MkUltra, the CIA’s Long, Documented History of “Mind Control” Experimentation
56
15.
Excerpts from selected Academic Articles on Psychotronic Weaponry
60
15.1 Humans Can Hear Microwave Energy
62
15.2 60 Minutes “Mind Reading” Segment
63
16.
Psychotronics Weaponry Potential of the U.S. BRAIN Initiative
64
16.1 BRAIN Initiative Focus on Neuroimaging
65
16.2 Asia Human Rights Commission Warns of Neuroweaponry Abuse
66
16.3 DARPA Focus on Electromagnetic Brain Signals
66
17.
Evidence of U.S. Military Development of Psychotronic or Microwave
Weapons
68
17.1 Definitive Proof of Neuroweaponry - an Army Screenshot
68
17.2 MEDUSA – An Unclassified Neuroweapon 69
17.3 Active Denial System (ADS)
70
18.
Selected Media Reports of Actual Psychotronic Weaponry Use
71
18.1 Media Coverage of Psychotronics Use in Iraq
71
18.2 Terrorist Brain Patterns Linked to Woodward’s Secret
73
18.3 A Billion-Dollar Psychotronic Arms Race
74
19.
List of Selected Patents on Technology with Psychotronic Weaponry
Potential
75
19.1 Patents Covering Silent Communications Technology, as well as Mood
Modification
Technology:
75
19.2 Patents Covering Subvocal Recognition (Essentially, “Reading of Internal
Dialogue/Thoughts”): 77
19.3 Patents Covering Brain Activity Visualization and Neuroimaging, such as
“Functional
Magnetic Resonance Imaging” and “Functional Electroencephalograms”
78
20.
Selected companies and agencies involved in development of
psychotronic weaponry or electronic warfare capabilities
80
Page
3
20.1 Private Sector Companies with Potential to Develop Neuroweapons 81
Organizational Chart of the U.S. Surveillance and Intelligence Community
83
21.
Targeted Individuals Phenomenon in U.S. and Worldwide
84
22.
Speculation on Basic Components of U.S. Psychotronic Weapons
System
85
22.1 A 13 Billion-Square-Mile Space-Based Radio Telescope Array
85
22.2 Microwave, UHF or VHF? Our Entire Bodies are SIGINT (Signals Intelligence)
86
23.
Victim’s Closing Statement
86
24.
Life, Interrupted
95
24.1 A Public Death 95
24.2 Nothing Goes as Planned
96
24.3 A Suicide Note 98
24.4 12/12/12
98
24.5 What it Feels Like to Torture Someone to Death
99
25.
The End of Privacy
101
25.1 Brain Taps
103
25.2 A Call for International Oversight
103
25.3 Woodward Holds Back on “Amazing” New Technology
104
25.4 A Very Brief History of Mind Control in America
105
25.5 Our Entire Bodies are SIGINT
106
25.6 Remote Sensing Via Radiotelescope
106
25.7 Targeted Individuals: High Tech Political Prisoners
107
26.
Copy of Police Report Against CIA in Mexico
109
27.
E-Mail to John Nagel from U.S. Federal Election Commission
110
28.
An Open Letter to Senate Intelligence Committee on Psychotronic
Weaponry
111
28.1 Psychotronic Weapons in Iraq War I and II 111
28.2 Echoes of Snowden, Assange
113
28.3 Microwave, UHF or VHF? Our Entire Bodies are SIGINT
114

1. Preface: An American Witness to Obama / CIA Organized Crime Ties

My name is John Nagel, and until 2012, I lived as a “Gringo,” or American
expatriate, in Mexico
City for 18 years.
This is my story:
On January 24, 2014, and then again with new facts and allegations on June 9, 2014,
I filed a
complaint with the Organization of American States (OAS) Human Rights Commission
against
the Government of the United States.
Page
4
I allege that I came to learn that the CIA exported $200 million monthly of
narcotics from Mexico,
and often much more, using CIA agents with diplomatic cover and immunity, CIA
contractors
and agents with non-official cover, CIA-protected aircraft, and CIA intelligence to
gain an
advantage over other drug trafficking organizations.
I also allege that I met an Obama-connected, organized crime-affiliated American
banker in
Mexico City in 2012 and, after trying to identify him by searching for an online
photograph, was
subsequently threatened with kidnapping by CIA “duty officers” at the U.S. Embassy
in Mexico
City and later with murder on three separate occasions by presumed CIA agents at
the Mexico
City airport.
It is worth noting that these threats at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City took place
while Hillary
Clinton, likely candidate for the 2016 presidential election, was Secretary of
State of the United
States. Such was my terror that when my passport needed extra pages in 2014, I
refused to
enter a United States diplomatic mission; an accommodating consular official at the
U.S.
Embassy in San Jose came outside to take my signature and tape in the extra pages.
In addition, and even more shockingly, I allege that I was subjected to
psychological “no touch”
torture using top secret technology in order to turn me into a virtual “political
prisoner” due to
information I came to possess about Obama and the CIA’s involvement in the Mexican
drug
trade, and to keep me silent about the Obama administration’s organized crime ties
in the runup to the 2012 election.
It can take years for the Commission to decide on the admissibility of a case, and
as of this
writing I have had no word on the Petition’s status, apart from an e-mail
confirmation that it has
been received.
Although, understandably, you may choose not to believe all or part of my account,
every word
is true.
I have sought to provide ample evidence of my bona fides by showing pictures of
prominent
individuals and organizations with whom I have associated professionally and
personally over
my lifetime, as well as extensive biographical information.
Even if you choose to not believe the assertions made in my specific case, it is my
hope that
you will leave this account convinced that so called “psychotronic” weapons, or
“neuroweapons,” which are designed to affect the electromagnetic signals in the
human nervous
system, exist in the United States’ arsenal and have been used, including in Iraq.
It is also my intent to convince you that the potential for abuse of psychotronic
arms poses an
extreme human rights risk to the global population.
I was ultimately incited by my Torturers to attempt a public suicide in December
2012 in protest
of my treatment and virtual enslavement, finally cutting my own throat with a
boxcutter and
receiving a total of 48 stitches.
Page
5
I chose suicide as a means of legitimate protest against the human rights
violations committed
against me, and I had lost hope that my relentless and brutal torture would ever
end. At that
point, I had been tormented non-stop for nearly three months.
My life had been threatened thousands of times, as had the lives and security of my
family
members, including my daughters, 11 and 2 years old at the time.
I later learned that the pattern of my torture was straight out of a CIA manual,
the KUBARK
manual on torture and interrogation.
Alluding to that manual, a Honduran army official trained in KUBARK techniques
said, “The first
thing we would say is that we know your mother, your younger brother. And better
you
cooperate, because if you don't, we're going to bring them in and rape them and
torture them
and kill them.”1
That is, essentially, what was done to me, just using the “silent communications”
technology and
“no—touch” psychological torture using the weapons which are described and heavily
documented in my Petition.
In an effort to escape my Torturers, I made four protest suicide attempts over a
period of 4 days.
In the final section of this volume, I discuss my suicide attempts and several
other points raised
in the Petition.
1.1

Bob Woodward: The President’s Man

Among many other topics related to the development of psychotronic weaponry, I

address what
I consider to be the negligence of the Washington Post’s Bob Woodward, ostensibly
the great
reporter of his generation.
Despite having exposed Watergate, and then written “All the President’s Men,” among
other
Pulitzer-winning work, ultimately, Woodward’s reputation may eternally be
tarnished.
Why?
Because, as you will learn, when ordered by top U.S. military commanders, Woodward
appears
to have allowed himself to be stifled and willfully neglected to disclose the use
of “psychotronic”
weaponry in the 2007 “surge” of American troops to Iraq in his 2008 book, “The War
Within: A
Secret White House History 2006-2008.”2

Gary Cohn, Ginger Thompson, and Mark Matthews, “Torture was taught by CIA;
Declassified manual
details the methods used in Honduras; Agency denials refuted,” The Baltimore Sun,
27 January 1997,
available at: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/40/055.html.
2
Bob Woodward discusses a new top-secret weapons system of the impact of the atomic
bomb, which
Victim states could include a psychotronic weapons system, in an interview with
Andrea Mitchell,
available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLhOUFYjTDM.
1

Page
6
Specifically, it is my contention that it is at least possible that Woodward failed
to reveal
technology such as the “Voice of God” weapon which is part of the system that I
describe in this
volume, as well as a new biometrics system for reading “terrorist brain patterns,”
a concept
originally developed by Lockheed Martin scientist John Norseen.3
Because of Woodward’s silence, thousands of innocent victims may have needlessly
suffered;
some, like me, may have turned to suicide when tortured with the same mind weapons
system
that Woodward coyly chose not to expose - which Woodward has stated is a “game
changing”
array of “new techniques and operations” that would “amaze” those who learned about
it the
future, and which, as you can see for yourself, Woodward has stated has the secrecy
and
impact of the Manhattan Project during World War II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=wLhOUFYjTDM.
Others could end up in mental institutions, with which I have been threatened
numerous times,
considered a “favorable outcome” by the intelligence community for a dissident who
is given socalled “medical leave” – remote psychological torture, possibly even
combined with an injection
with a cocktail of pharmaceuticals, designed to induce insanity and permanent
institutionalization and annul the credibility of the victim.
Bob Woodward, once eager to take down a president for wrongdoing, perhaps overly
attached
to his role as a former Naval Intelligence officer or not wanting to lose access to
top government
officials, has refused to disclose, even now, seven years later, anything specific
that he knows
about these amazing “techniques and operations” used in Iraq.
Of course, it is quite possible that my reasoned guess about the nature of these
“techniques and
operations” is wrong.
Woodward could be referring to an entirely different, but equally sinister,
technology which can
track humans using atomic sized particles.
He could, for example, be referring to the Terminator-like Continuous Clandestine
Tagging,
Tracking, and Locating (CTTL) program to target and monitor terrorists, which
tracks individuals
using technology such as nanoscale quantum dots and advanced remote sensor drones
to
monitor biometrics and bioelectrical data such as a person’s unique thermal
signature or heart
electricity pattern, as well as features such as long distance facial recognition
and gait analysis,
among other traits (chillingly but assuredly, CTTL is a technology soon to come to
a police force
or federal surveillance agency near you, leading to far more grievous abuses of
privacy and
further encroachment by the surveillance state than we have seen so far).

Doug Pasternak,“John Norseen, Reading Your Mind and Injecting Smart Thoughts,”
Newsweek, Jan. 3,
2000, archive available at
http://web.archive.org/web/20010815122646/http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/Norseen
.htm.
3

Page
7
But the CTTL program is seemingly not as secret as the Manhattan Project, as
evidenced by an
unclassified 2007 presentation published by Wired magazine.4 And, it is not clear
that the CTTL
program would have been fully deployable at that time.
In any case, it has been independently reported that “Voice of God” weapons, able
to project
voices into the brains of targeted humans, were used in Iraq, as noted by Wired
Magazine and
the Toronto Star,5 among other publications, a major development in the use of
psychotronic
weaponry in wartime on which Woodward failed to report.
Isn’t it past time for Woodward to inform the American people about a military
development
tantamount to the Manhattan Project and the atomic bomb?
No matter what it is, I want to know.
Don’t you?
Or will Bob Woodward take his biggest story to the grave?
1.2

An Orwellian Deprivation of Civil Rights…An Election Connection?

Whether the “techniques and operations” Woodward was referring to included so-
called
“psychotronic” weapons or not, the fact is that, in my case, due to my knowledge of
the CIA’s
heavy involvement in the Mexican narcotics trade, I became what is known as a
“Targeted
Individual,”6 or a person who is homed in on by black U.S. government units and
tortured using
weapons and systems designed to affect the behavior or mood of human beings, such
as “Voice
of God” technology.
As a result of these abuses, over the past year and a half, I have come to see
myself as a
dissident of the U.S., my country of birth – but without the publicity of my
comrades in dissent,
Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange. Because I have been tortured,
and
even virtually “enslaved” by the CIA and told I am a political prisoner of the US
Government, I
consider myself to be one of the leading dissidents in the world today, on a level
with Aung Aan
Suu Kyi or similar activists who have been punished for their beliefs or
activities.
My basic human rights have been systematically denied by clandestine agencies using
top
secret, ostensibly “non-lethal” “Voice of God” communications weaponry and other
psychotronic
arms against me.
These agencies include the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security
Agency (NSA),
the Defense Department and/or other secret U.S. intelligence agencies or their
contractors
4

Unclassifed presentation of CTTL from 2007 available at:

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/files/Richardson_Continuous.pdf
5
CTTL and “Voice of God” Technology described by the Toronto Star:
http://www.thestar.com/news/2008/09/13/pentagons_secret_weapon_woodward.html .
Voice of God
weapon described by Wired Magazine http://www.wired.com/2007/12/the-voice-of-go/.
6
Available at: http://noliesradio.org/archives/26610.

Page
8
which began to torture me starting just prior to, and perhaps even skewing the
results of, the
2012 election -- due to the damaging information I came to possess about the White
House and
the CIA while living in Mexico City.
You will come to understand the astonishing ways in which my rights have been
violated in the
following Petition made to the Organization of American States Inter-American Human
Rights
Commission.
Bear in mind that these occurrences have taken place amidst the greatest turmoil
ever seen in
U.S. and global intelligence agencies, with seemingly unlimited NSA spying on U.S.
and foreign
citizens and leaders, a world in which, for example, the CIA - an agency which it
is well
documented has no problem with kidnapping and torture - controls a growing drone
air force.
Thanks to whistleblower Edward Snowden, it is now well known that the United States
has
engaged in global spying on a massive level against Americans, as well as against
allies such
Italy, France, Germany, Brazil, Spain and Mexico, largely in collusion with the
United Kingdom,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand – the Five Eyes English-speaking nations, who
cooperate
closely on intelligence matters.7
The NSA’s activities range from hacking Angela Merkel’s cell phone to even
diverting computer
deliveries and installing backdoor programs which use radio transmissions to
monitor all
computer activity, even when offline.8

And that’s just the beginning.

Because now, “out of control” extends to “mind control,” and though I know it
sounds incredible,
you will see that this technology has been actively under development and that the
U.S.
defense/intelligence structure is intent on “hacking our brains.”
For today's police/surveillance state, our entire bodies are SIGINT (signals
intelligence), subject
to remote monitoring, torture and worse by black government agencies or off-books
contractors
hired to provide the CIA with plausible deniability.9
I know, because as a result of such torture, I took the drastic action of my public
suicide
attempts, cutting my own throat in front of a major media outlet in legitimate
political protest
against the Obama administration and its actions against me and my family.
I was well on the path to death.
Available at: http://rt.com/op-edge/nsa-revelations-uk-reaction-832/
DAVID E. SANGER and THOM SHANKER, “N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers,”
The New
York Times, Jan. 14, 2014, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/us/nsa-
effort-pries-opencomputers-not-connected-to-internet.html?_r=0.
9
According to Wikipedia, “plausible deniability is a term coined by the CIA in the
early 1960s to
describe the withholding of information from senior officials in order to protect
them from
repercussions in the event that illegal or unpopular activities by the CIA became
public knowledge.”
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability.
7
8

Page
9
How did I get on this path?
I’ll let the following Petition to the Inter-American Human Rights Commission
explain why I
made my suicide attempts and how I have undergone brutal torture due to my meeting
an
Obama-connected banker, rumored to be a “Mob Godfather.”
Also in this account, I elaborate extensively on my situation and on the origin,
nature and extent
of U.S. psychotronic weaponry, as well as its risks.
And although the following account deals with concepts reminiscent of science
fiction, it is
grounded in personal experience and extensive research into government
“neuroweapons”
programs.
I ask readers only to suspend their initial reaction of disbelief, and to treat the
account provided
here as if every word were true - because that is indeed the case.
The Petition included herein is dedicated to the memory of innocent victims of
psychotronic
weaponry and those who have been subjected to non-consensual experimentation - or
who may
be in the future.
In other words, as you shall come to understand, it is dedicated to everyone on
Earth – because
no one is immune from this technology.

Page
10
Page
11
2. Petition to the Inter-American Human Rights Commission

FORM

SECTION I. INFORMATION ON THE ALLEGED VICTIM

AND PETITIONER
1. INFORMATION ON THE ALLEGED VICTIM(S)
Please provide the information about the person or group affected by the
violation(s) of
human rights.
It is important to notify the Commission immediately and in writing if the alleged
victim(s)
wish/ wishes to change representation or become the petitioner in his/her/their own
petition.
If there is more than one victim, please add the data in the “Additional
Information”
Section. Name of the alleged victim:

JOHN M. NAGEL

Sex of the alleged victim: F ❑ M √

Date of birth of the alleged victim: (14/3/1969)
Mailing address of the alleged victim (including the street or avenue, number/name
of the
building or house, apartment, city, state or province, postal code, country):
Tokio 7G
Col. Juarez
Mexico, DF 06000

Telephone number of the alleged victim (include area codes if possible):

+525552080874

Page
12
Fax number of the alleged victim (include area codes if possible: +52 55522080874
Email of the alleged victim: jnagel1000@hotmail.com
jnagel1000@hotmail.com
Is (are) the alleged victim(s) deprived of liberty? No √ Yes ❑
Additional information about the alleged victim(s):

Page
13
2.1

Background of Victim – John M. Nagel

Victim states that he was born in New York City, was educated in the United States,
lived in
Mexico for more than 18 years, that he is a United States Citizen and a legitimate
businessman.10
Victim states that he founded a business in Mexico and also previously worked as
the Mexico
City Correspondent for a major Washington publishing house.
Victim notes that an early investor in his business was Mr. William J. Solloway, a
major global
investor, mining executive and president of Toronto-based Klondike Mines Ltd.11
Victim states that he has interviewed and been photographed with senior government
officials,
including former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo and Mr. José Ángel Gurria,
current
Secretary General of the Organization for Economic Development (OECD).
Victim states that he worked in ambulances of the Mexican Red Cross in 2012, and
that he has
saved the lives of Mexican people, risking his own life to do so.
While with the Red Cross, he was photographed with Tadateru Konoé, President of the
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, as well as
Marcelo Luis
Ebrard, former Mayor of Mexico City.12
Victim states that he was also an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) licensed in
2010 by the
Philippine Society of Emergency Medical Technicians (PSEMT), and he worked in
ambulances
in the Philippines.13
Victim states that he wrote more than 1,500 daily news articles on the economy,
international
trade, regulations, labor affairs and the environment as Mexico City Correspondent
for the
Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (BNA), a Washington-based publishing house which
is now a
subsidiary of Bloomberg News.
Victim states that he has reported for and/or has been published in numerous media,
including
the Journal of Commerce, the Manchester Guardian, the London Independent, the
Christian
Science Monitor, the Philadephia Inquirer, the Daily Deal, Time Magazine, the
Washington
Times and El Financiero International, among other publications.
Victim’s Curriculum Vitae is available at:
http://www.conexionejecutiva.com/Contents/John
%20Nagel.docx.
11
BusinessWeek profile of Mr. William J. Solloway available at:
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?
personId=7338180&ticker=KDX:CN.
12
Available at: http://www.ifrc.org/en/who-we-are/governance/president/.
13
The Philippine Society of Emergency Medical Technicians (PSEMT) is the only
recognized governing
body for standards and certifications for professional emergency medical
technicians in the Philippines.
Available at: http://www.psemt.org.
10

Page
14
Victim states that his work has been referenced before the United States Supreme
Court,14 the
United States International Trade Commission,15 and elsewhere.
Victim states that he has interviewed or reported on numerous senior U.S., Mexican
and other
foreign government officials and executives, such as U.S. investor and leveraged
buyout
specialist Mr. Wilbur Ross of WL Ross & Co.,16 former U.S. Ambassador to Mexico
James
Jones,17 former U.S. President William Clinton, former U.S. Treasury Secretary
Lawrence
Summers and many others.
Victim attended the University of Southern California’s Center for International
Journalism,
where he was awarded a prestigious Fellowship in International Journalism, which
brought hiim
to Mexico in 1994. While a graduate fellow at U.S.C., Victim states that he met
prominent
journalists such as former CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite and the Washington
Post’s David
Ignatius. While at U.S.C, Victim studied under international relations specialist
Abraham
Lowenthal, among many others.18
Victim states that he worked at the Investor’s Business Daily Newspaper in Los
Angeles,19 and
was Managing Editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere, a highly-regarded
newsletter published by the Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA), a Washington-
based think
tank on U.S. Latin – American relations.20
Victim states that he graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, where he
earned a B.A. in Latin American studies.

Example of citation of Victim's work in U.S. Supreme Court Petition: No. 03-358,
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. PUBLIC CITIZEN, ET AL. ON
PETITION FOR A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Available
at: http://www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2003/2pet/7pet/2003-358.pet.aa.html.
15
Example of citation of Victim's work in International Trade Commission publication:
Magdolna Kornis,
“Mexican Trucks Gain Access to U.S. Highways,” International Economic Review,
March/April 2002, p 9.
Available at: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?
q=cache:XHtJ3F0pdRAJ:www.usitc.gov/publications/ier/pub3506.pdf+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk
.
16
BusinessWeek profile of Mr. Wilbur Ross available at:
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?
personId=209191&privcapId=43474931&previousCapId=1624483&previousTitle=Debevoise
%20&
%20Plimpton,%20LLP.
17
Biography of Ambassador James Jones available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Robert_Jones.
18
Abraham F. Lowenthal is professor emeritus of international relations at the
University of Southern
California, president emeritus of the Pacific Council on International Policy, an
adjunct professor
(research) at the Watson Institute at Brown University, and a nonresident senior
fellow at the Brookings
Institution. He was the founding director of both the Latin American Program of the
Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars and of the Inter-American Dialogue, and served as
a Ford Foundation
official in Latin America, as director of studies at the Council on Foreign
Relations, and on numerous
editorial and governance boards. His AB, MPA and PhD are all from Harvard
University. Biography
available at: http://watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/lowenthal .
19
Victim was employed at William O’Neal & Co. Publisher of the Investor’s Business
Daily Newspaper in
1991- 1992.
20
More about COHA available at: www.coha.org.
14

Page
15
Victim also states that he attended the Lawrenceville School, a U.S. preparatory
school also
attended by, for example, Geoff Morrell, a longtime White House Correspondent for
ABC News,
who also served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs with
the U.S.
Department of Defense from 2007-2011. Other Lawrenceville alumni include Theodore
Boesky
and Jonathan Boesky, sons of Ivan Boesky, a prominent former Wall Street trader who
was
convicted of insider trading in the 1980s.
Victim states that he attended the Browning School in New York City, along with
students such
as John Zaccaro, Jr., son of Geraldine Ferraro, ex-candidate for Vice President of
the United
States (the finances of Ferraro’s husband, John Zaccaro, Sr., were a significant
issue in Walter
Mondale’s 1988 presidential campaign).
Victim states that another classmate was Andrew Zuccotti, son of John Zuccotti, the
New York
real estate developer for whom Zuccotti Park is named, where the Occupy Wall Street
protests
took place.
Victim states that his mother at one time had a personal friendship with David
Koch, a principal
in Koch Industries.
Victim states that he was confirmed at Saint James’ Church in New York City, and
that Victim’s
religion classes were imparted by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the Nobel laureate who,
at that
time, in the early 1980s, was a visiting minister at the Church.
Victim states that he comes from a prominent U.S. family.
For example, the Bridgehampton, NY home of his grandmother, Francis Schieffelin,
was
purchased by Lee Radziwell, sister of Jacqueilne Onassis, forming a compound with
the
neighboring Kennedy-Smiths.
The Victim’s cousin, Chalkley J. Hambleton, was president and vice-chair of Harris
Trust bank in
Chicago and worked for the bank for 40 years.21
The victim’s grandfather, Aldo Balsam, was controlling shareholder and treasurer of
the
Celanese Corporation and on the board of the Harvard University chemistry
department.
Victim also states that he is a so-called “Mayflower Descendant” - a descendant of
the original
European settlers of the United States in 1620.
Victim includes several photographs with prominent individuals below.

21

Obituary of Chalkley J. Hambleton Sr.: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-

0919/news/9609190017_1_boards-metropolitan-chicago-jay.
Page
16
Left to Right: Kevin Hall, McClatchy Newspapers, John M. Nagel, former President of
Mexico
Ernesto Zedillo,

Page
17
Victim in second row, last person on right. Center of picture features Tadateru
Konoé, President of the
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, as well as
Marcelo Luis Ebrard,
former Mayor of Mexico City and Mayor’s spouse, 2012.

Victim, right, with former CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite, 1993. 22

While CBS News anchor, Walter Cronkite was repeatedly referred to as “the most
trusted man in
America.” Victim states that he was selected among all students of the University
of Southern
California School of Journalism at the time to chauffeur Mr. Cronkite to Los
Angeles International Airport
following an honorary dinner attended by Diane Sawyer, anchor of ABC News' flagship
program, ABC
World News, among other prominent journalists.
22

Page
18
Victim, right, with domestic partner and colleague, Comdex Mexico, 1997.

Victim, right, on duty at Lifeline Rescue, Manila, Philippines, 2010.

2. INFORMATION ON THE FAMILY MEMBERS

Please provide information regarding the close family members of the alleged
victim(s)
who are likely to have suffered harm as a result of the alleged violation of human
rights.
Name of the family members and relationship to the alleged victim:
Nancy Sanchez, former domestic partner of Victim and mother of Victim’s 1st
daughter
Anik Nagel Sanchez, Victim’s daughter
Marie Ordanel, Mother of Victim’s 2nd daughter
Page
19
Jannah Ordanel, Victim’s daughter
Suzanne Nagel, Victim’s mother

Mailing address of the family members (including the street or avenue, number/name
of
building or house, apartment, city, state or province, postal code, country):

Telephone number of the family members (include area codes if possible):

Fax of the family members (include area codes if possible):

Additional information on the family members:

Victim’s alleges that family members have been repeatedly threatened as described
in this petition.

3. DATA ON THE PETITIONER

Page
20
Please provide information about the person or group that is submitting the
petition.

It is important to notify the Commission immediately of any change in mailing

address.
Name of the petitioner (In the event that it is non-governmental organization,
include the name of the
legal representative(s) who will receive the communications. If it is more than one
organization or person,
include the additional information in the space provided):
Acronym of the organization (if applicable):

Mailing address of the petitioner (including the street or avenue, number/name of

building or house,
apartment, city, state or province, postal code, country):

(NOTE: The Commission requires a mailing address to send notifications related to

your petition.)

Telephone number of the petitioner (include area codes if possible): +506 221-0111,
+52 555-2080874

Fax of the petitioner (include area codes if possible): +52 555 208-0874

Email of the petitioner:

In certain cases, the Commission can keep the identity of the petitioner
confidential, if expressly
requested. This means that only the name of the alleged victim will be communicated
to the State if
the IACHR decides to process your petition.
Do you want the IACHR to keep your identity as petitioner confidential during the
procedure?
No √ Yes
Additional information about the petitioner(s):
See background information about Victim above (Victim is Petitioner). .

4. IS YOUR PETITION RELATED TO A PREVIOUS PETITION OR A REQUEST

FOR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES?

Page
21
Have you previously submitted a Petition to the Commission concerning these same
facts? No √ Yes
(If yes, indicate the number of the Petition): No.
Have you submitted a request for precautionary measures to the Commission
concerning these same
facts?
N o √ Yes

SECTION II. FACTS ALLEGED

1. MEMBER STATE OF THE OAS AGAINST WHICH THE COMPLAINT
IS SUBMITTED
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

2. THE FACTS
Provide, in chronological order, an account of the facts that is as thorough and
detailed as
possible. In particular, specify the place, the date, and the circumstances in
which the
alleged violations occurred.
2.2 Chronology of Human Rights Abuses against Victim

3. Summary: September 25, 2012 – January 26, 2014

3.1 Electronic Torture Using “Neuroweapons”
Victim alledges that, due to numerous contacts that he had with the American
intelligence
community in Mexico, he came to learn that the CIA exported $200 million monthly of
narcotics
from Mexico, and often much more, using CIA agents with diplomatic cover and
immunity,nonofficial cover agents, CIA-protected aircraft, and CIA intelligence to
gain an advantage over
other drug trafficking organizations.
Due to his knowledge of organized crime ties of the administration of U.S.
President Barack
Obama and participation by the CIA in the Mexican drug trade, Victim alleges that
he has been
subjected to numerous violations under OAS Human Rights Treaties including threats
by CIA
agents (duty officers) at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico, as well electronic torture
purportedly
inflicted on him by clandestine agencies of the Government of the United States
using
microwave/ Ultra High Frequency (UHF)/ Very High Frequency (VHF) and/or other
similar and
related psychotronic weaponry technologies,
Page
22
Victim alleges that he was incited by the U.S. Government’s use of secret WMD
psychological
torture technology to attempt suicide on 4 occasions in December 2012.
Victim alleges that electronic torture – consisting primarily of so-called “Voice
of God” silent
communications technology, subvocal recognition and remote neural monitoring - has
been
inflicted on him from Sept. 25, 2012 until at least the date of filing of this
Petition, in four different
OAS member States – Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica and Nicaragua.
Victim states that all of the human rights abuses against him have been designed to
keep him
what his captors have called his “virtual political prisoner” of the CIA due to his
knowledge of
organized crime times of the U.S. presidential administration and participation in
the Mexican
drug trade.
Victim states that the aforementioned technologies are described in depth in points
11 through
20 of this Petition.
Victim notes that the OAS Permanent Council denounced and condemned the
circumstances
leading to a complaint over microwave torture made by ousted Honduran President
Manuel
Zelaya in 2009, and it urged the OAS Human Rights Commission to “follow up on this
situation.”23
In addition, Victim highlights the following 2013 statement from the Asian Human
Rights
Commission on the use of so-called “neuroweapons:”
“The threat is real...(there are) many indications that brain technology for
neuroweapons is
scientifically possible. Additionally, some say such technologies have been used
systematically
against select people in various jurisdictions.”24

Victim states that, in addition to resolving on his own situation, urgent attention
is required to the
main issues raised in this Petition to prevent the possibility of virtual “mental
enslavement” of
individuals, sectors of the population, or the global population as a whole through
the use of
weapons designed to affect the behavior and emotions of human beings.
Victim notes that his torture has taken place in a context in which the President
of the European
Parliament, Martin Schulz, has said that U.S. secret services are “out of control,”
and it is now
known that the U.S., with the knowledge of President Obama, has engaged in spying
on a
massive level.25

Organization of American States (OAS) “CONDEMNATION OF THE ACTS OF INTIMIDATION

AGAINST
THE EMBASSY OF BRAZIL IN HONDURAS,” (Approved by the OAS Permanent Council at its
meeting of
October 21, 2009), available at: http://www.oas.org/consejo/resolutions/dec43.asp.
24
See September 27, 2013 statement from the Asian Human Rights Commission on
neuroweapons,
available at: http://www.humanrights.asia/news/ahrc-news/AHRC-STM-174-2013.
25
Available at: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101142910.
23

Page
23
Victim calls attention to the statement from former National Security Agency
Contractor and
whistleblower Edward Snowden, who stated in a 2013 Christmas address:
“A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all. They'll
never know what it
means to have a private moment to themselves -- an unrecorded, unanalyzed thought.”
26

Snowden also has been reported as stating that he fears for his life and health due
to threats
from the United States Government.27
Alluding to Snowden, Time.com said:
“The whistleblower, who has been granted asylum in Russia, cited reports of
anonymous U.S.
officials wishing him harm. ‘These people, and they are government officials, have
said they would
love to put a bullet in my head or poison me when I come out of the supermarket and
then watch
me die in the shower,' Snowden said.”28
Snowden was responding to threats made on the media website Buzzfeed, which said:
“One Army intelligence officer even offered BuzzFeed a chillingly detailed fantasy.
“I think if we had
the chance, we would end it very quickly,” he said. “Just casually walking on the
streets of Moscow,
coming back from buying his groceries. Going back to his flat and he is casually
poked by a
passerby. He thinks nothing of it at the time starts to feel a little woozy and
thinks it’s a parasite
from the local water. He goes home very innocently and next thing you know he dies
in the
shower.”29

Victim states that the threats made against Snowden constitute proof that U.S.
clandestine
agencies have established assassination programs and have lethal secret injection
weapons
that can be used against dissidents and whistleblowers.30
Victim states that he, like Snowden, has been constantly threatened, as has his
family.
In the context of this documented Orwellian surveillance and intimidation carried
out by the
Government of the United States, Victim provides the following account of numerous
and
ongoing human rights abuses committed against him during this period:

Edward Snowden statement available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqkpxMrxWkI.

Kharunya Paramaguru, “Snowden: My Life Is In Danger,” Time Magazine website, 26
January 2014,
available at: http://world.time.com/2014/01/27/snowden-german-tv-comments/.
28
Ibid.
29
Benny Johnson, “America’s Spies Want Edward Snowden Dead,” Buzzfeed.com, Jan. 14,
2014.
Available at: http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/americas-spies-want-edward-
snowden-dead.
30
Ibid.
26
27

Page
24
4. September 25, 2012
4.1

An American Banker

Victim alleges that, on this date, he met an American Banker on the street while
buying coffee
nearby his Mexico City residence, located three blocks from the United States
Embassy in
Mexico City.
Victim alleges that the Banker initiated the conversation, apparently having prior
knowledge of
the Victim’s identity, and mentioned that he was a political fundraiser for U.S.
President Barack
Obama.
Victim states that video evidence of said banker and the Victim crossing paths
would be
available from Avenida Reforma almost direcctly in front of the location of Banamex
near
Calle Praga at approximatley 9 a.m. Victim urges investigation of this video for
the purpose of
confiirming the identity of this indivividual.
Victim states said Banker did not identify himself by name. However, the Banker
told Victim that
the U.S. government had “heavily invested” in Victim because Victim “helped to calm
violence in
Mexico.”
Victim concluded that the Banker was referring to Victim having been a prominent
member of
his community, due to his having been a journalist and innovative businessman in
Mexico City,
as well as being a Mexican Red Cross ambulance worker. In 2012, Victim also made a
successful complaint to local governmental authorities (Delegacion Cuauhtémoc)
about
organized crime activities in Mexico City, despite repeated death threats from
organized crime
elements. Victim states that as a result of his activities, he gained stature in
his community, and
through a series of circumstances came to learn of extensive CIA involvement in the
Mexican
drug economy.31
The subjects later conversed.
The American Banker did not elaborate further, but set an appointment to meet with
Victim at
10:00 a.m., September 26, 2012, at the Lobby Bar of the Sheraton Maria Isabel Hotel
in Mexico
City (adjacent to the U.S. Embassy), to discuss a major financial transaction
concerning Victim’s
www.conexionejecutiva.com Internet business, telling the Victim to prepare a “deal
memo” for
sale of said business.

31

Copies of the aforementioned complaint were delivered to the U.S. Ambassador to

Mexico, Anthony
Wayne, as well as the Ambassadors of other diplomatic missions in Mexico, including
Japan, Korea and
the United Kingdom, among others.
Page
25
5. September 26, 2012
5.1

Internet Search for the Banker’s Picture

Victim alleges that he attended said meeting at the time and place established with
said “deal
memo,” but that the American Banker failed to attend the meeting.
Victim subsequently (within 15 minutes of original meeting time), while at a
Starbucks coffee
shop in Mexico City -- within the Sheraton Maria Isabel -- performed an Internet
search using
the Google Search Engine to search images for “Obama Fundraiser” in an attempt to
identify
the Banker by locating a photograph of him on the Internet, so as to contact the
Banker for the
purpose of concluding the financial transaction, which the Banker had suggested
would be
highly beneficial to the Victim.
Victim alleges that he very briefly searched for photos of the Banker on the Google
Search
Engine, but was unable to locate him. Victim alleges that the physical description
of the Banker
is as follows: very tall, expensive grey suit, about 6’6" – 6’7,” very
slender/thin, with slicked back
grey/black hair, gaunt face and a hawk nose, approximately 55-60 years old,
American accent.
Banker was wearing expensive suit. Victim reiterates that video of the individual
in question, a
reputed Mob Godfather, is available of him crossing paths with the Victim.
5.2

“Silent Sound” Communications Begin

Victim alleges that, almost immediately after performing the aforementioned search
for said
Banker, he began to be subjected to what he later understood to be electronic
torture in the form
of hearing threatening voices in English which other people could not hear,
apparently using
well-documented “Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS)”32 or similar secret
technology
allowing for silent communication directly into the human brain.
Victim states that a detailed description of how Silent Sound Spread Spectrum
(SSSS)
technology works, using the “Microwave Auditory Effect” (also known as the
Microwave Hearing
Effect, the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect, or the Frey Effect), as well as
detailed information
about related “psychotronic” weapons technologies, is provided in sections 11 - 20
of this
Petition.33
Victim states that although many weapons experts believe that most U.S. “silent
sound” and
other psychotronic weapons are highly classified secrets,34 there is at least one
U.S. weapons
system, developed by the Navy as a “Remote Personnel Incapacitation System” and
known as
One of many explanations of Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS), sometimes referred
to “Quad S”
silent communications technology, is available at:
http://educateyourself.org/cn/soundsofsilence11dec08.shtml. The existence of this
technology and its use by the
United States Military during both U.S. wars in Iraq (1991 and 2007) are discussed
in section 17 of this
Petition.
33
Ibid.
34
See Cheryl Welsh, Essex Human Rights Review Vol. 9 No. 1, June 2012, 31. Available
at:
http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V9N1/WELSH.pdf.
32

Page
26
MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio), which is unclassified and is
known to
have “silent sound” communication capability.35 A description of the MEDUSA weapons
system
is provided in section 16 of this Petition. Extensive evidence is provided of the
existence of such
“silent sound” technologies and their use by the United States, for example in both
U.S. wars in
Iraq.
Victim alleges that the first such “silent sound” communication that he heard,
seconds after
performing the Internet search for a photograph of the Banker, was a disembodied
voice stating:
“You’re toast.”36 Victim states that he later understood this voice to be generated
using the socalled “silent communications” technology described above, allowing for
the remote projection of
human voices directly into the human brain using targeted radio frequencies and/or
microwaves.
Victim, being of sound mind, states that, at the time, he was obviously alarmed by
this
disembodied voice, which he took to be a threat. Due to the timing and nature of
this threat,
Victim concluded that it was directly related to the search for the picture of the
American Banker
(Victim asserts that while preparing this Petition, he has extensively searched the
Internet for
pictures of said Banker, but has been unable to identify him).
Subsequently, Victim continued to hear disembodied voices which continuously
threatened the
Victim with death, as well as threatening Victim’s daughter and her mother.
5.3

Kidnapping Threat at U.S. Embassy

Victim alleges that, also on this date, while still in Starbucks adjacent to the
United States
Embassy in Mexico City, a middle-aged American male individual approached Victim
where he
was sitting and, still standing, said, “This isn’t funny. Get ready to have your
ears pinned back”
Anohter added, “We have a holding car.” 37 Victim urges review and investigation of
Starbucks video and audio evidence verifying his accounts and showing that he was
being threatened by US officials.
After making these statements, said individual abruptly left Starbucks, not waiting
for a response
from Victim. Victim states that he understood these comments to be threats that he
would be
kidnapped, murdered or both.
Victim remained in Starbucks but, concerned about his daughter and her mother due
to the
threats made to him using what he later understood to be secret “silent
communications”
technology, attempted to telephone his daughter’s mother to ensure the safety of
his family
members.

See original Navy contract and description of MEDUSA project, available at:
http://www.navysbirprogram.com/NavySearch/Summary/summary.aspx?pk=F5B07D68-1B19-
4235B140-950CE2E19D08.
36
“You’re toast” is an American expression meaning “One that is doomed, in trouble,
or unworthy of
further consideration.” Definition available at:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/toast.
37
To “have one’s ears pinned back” in American idiom means “to be chastised, scolded
or verbally
disciplined in a very forceful manner, or, by extension, to be soundly defeated in
a contest or an
argument.” Definition available at: http://www.word-detective.com/2007/07/ears-
pinned-back/.
35

Page
27
When attempting to call his family via cellular telephone, Victim’s cellular phone
signal was
suddenly cut off, which, in combination with the aforementioned threats of
kidnapping and
murder and harm to Victim, contributed to Victim’s anxiety. Victim immediately left
Starbucks
and approached the front gate of the United States Embassy in Mexico City, 30
meters away,
and asked to urgently speak to an Embassy officer. Victim’s cellular telephone
remained without
service.
Victim asserts that he went to United States Embassy because he felt that Embassy
staff might
have knowledge of, or be able to assist in, his situation due to the Banker’s
statement the
preceding day that the U.S. government had “invested heavily” in Victim due to his
“helping to
calm the violence in Mexico.”
Victim asserts that large numbers of the staff of the U.S. Embassy in Mexico were
aware of
Victim’s identity due to his being a frequent customer at Starbucks adjacent to the
U.S.
Embassy, and due to his being a prominent member of his community, as well as
having been a
journalist who frequented the Embassy, in addition to being a businessman and
having
delivered the aforementioned complaint regarding local organized crime activities
to Anthony
Wayne, the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico, among other diplomatic missions in the
country.
Subsequently, two men who identified themselves as “Duty Officers” came to talk to
Victim,
remaining within the Embassy gates, while the Victim remained on the sidewalk of
Paseo de la
Reforma, the main avenue outside the U.S. Embassy in Mexico.
Victim states that these Duty Officers, or CIA officers, did not identify
themselves by name or
exact position in the U.S. Embassy. One Duty Officer was bearded, approximately 30
years old
and 5’11,” the other was taller and very thin, approximately 25-30 years old and
6”1,” clean
shaven.
Victim explained his situation to these Duty Officers and stated that he felt that
he had just been
threatened with kidnapping or murder in Starbucks and that his cellular telephone
service had
been cut off. Duty Officers assisted in contacting Victim’s family using the
cellular telephone of
one of the Duty Officers. Victim asked his family to meet him at the Embassy.
While waiting for his family members, Victim remained outside of the front gate of
the United
States Embassy. During this period, Victim overheard the bearded duty officer
respond to a
remark by the second duty officer, saying, “We’re not going to kidnap an American
off the
street.” Victim states that Mexican police guarding the Embassy were standing
nearby and
witnessed this incident.
Victim urges facial recognition and audio searches of his interactions with U.S.
Embassy
personnel so as to verify his version of events, and that embassy officers were
threatening him.
Victim became alarmed at the apparent suggestion that he might be kidnapped by the
Embassy
officials, concluding that it was possible that the U.S. Embassy, its staff, or the
United States
Government or its contractors were responsible for what he later understood to be
Silent Sound
Page
28
Spread Spectrum (SSSS) or similar silent communications technology and the previous
kidnapping/murder threat in Starbucks.
Victim concluded that it had been his Internet search for the American Banker’s
photograph
which had triggered the sudden and unexpected use of electronic weaponry against
him, as well
the “holding car” remark from the individual in Starbucks, and also the Duty
Officers’
conversation regarding kidnapping of Victim.
Victim immediately distanced himself from U.S. Embassy Duty Officers and waited for
his family
near Mexican police. Victim’s family arrived safely and Victim accompanied family
to Victim’s
office. Victim’s cellular telephone service was eventually restored on this date.
That evening, Victim alleges that he was practically unable to sleep due to
constant
psychological torture inflicted by American voices using what he later understood
to be Silent
Sound Spread Spectrum or similar “silent communications” technology, purportedly by
psychological operations (PSY-OPS)38 operatives of clandestine agencies of the
Government of
the United States or their contractors, which eventually alternately identified
themselves to the
Victim as being either with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the
National Security
Agency (NSA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD).
Victim alleges that these voices, transmitted using electronic microwave or similar
Radio
Frequency (RF) communications technology, constantly insisted that Victim would be
killed or
kidnapped, as would his daughter and her mother.

6. September 27, 2012

6.1 The Banker - a Mob Godfather?
On this date, electronic torture of Victim continued in the form of disembodied
voices
threatening to harm Victim and his family.
Also, Victim was told by persons in his neighborhood, including U.S. and Mexican
intelligence
sources, that the Banker two days previously that there was a rumor in Victim’s
neighborhood
that the Banker was an American “Mob” organized crime leader, or more specifically,
“the
Godfather.”
Based on this information, Victim deduced a possible motive for the electronic
torture which
began simultaneous with the Google search for the Banker’s photograph: that, in
addition to
being an Obama fundraiser, the Banker was possibly involved with organized crime
(perhaps
being “the Godfather” as the rumor said), which made Victim’s search to identify
the Banker a
potential political liability for the U.S. government due to the administration’s
possible links to
organized crime, illegal campaign financing or other offenses.
According to Wikipedia, Psychological Operations, or PSY-OPS “are planned
operations to convey
selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions,
motives, objective
reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and
individuals. The
purpose of United States psychological operations is to induce or reinforce
behavior favorable to US
objectives.” Available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations_(United_States).
38

Page
29
Victim’s Torturers continued to torment victim psychologically, mainly threatening
his personal
safety and that of his family, as well as accusing him of having “criminal
associations” which the
Victim states that he does not have, as well as threatening to have Victim
arrested, prosecuted
or extradited for offences of which Victim has no knowledge.
Victim alleges that Torturers explained what they said was the difference between
the “Mafia”
and the “Mob.” According to Torturers, “Mob” refers to the financial side of
organized crime,
while “Mafia” refers to the operations and enforcement side of organized crime.
Torturers told Victim using silent communication that torture was “to teach a
lesson” to Victim,
because Victim had searched for pictures on the Internet in an effort to try to
identify and locate
the American Banker.
Victim’s Torturers - which range in number from approximately 2 to 5 individuals at
any one time,
on a 24-hour, 7-day-a-week basis - repeatedly suggested that torture of Victim
would cease if
Victim cooperated with Torturers. Victim alleges that he made every effort to
placate his
tormenters in an effort for the torture to cease, but that every time he did so,
Torturers would
take a new approach and continue torturing him.
6.2

Torturers “Protecting the President”…An Election Connection?

Victim alleges that his electronic Torturers implied that the upcoming 2012
presidential election
in the United States was one of the reasons he was being tortured, in order to keep
Victim
marginalized so that Victim would be unable to publicize his knowledge of possible
organized
crime ties to the Obama administration, and thus would be unable to negatively
influence the
2012 presidential election.
Victim states that Torturers suggested that torture would stop after the 2012
elections (which
Victim alleges is untrue – Victim alleges that torture has continued on an ongoing
basis at least
until the date of the filing of this Petition).
Victim states that Torturers told Victim using silent communications technology
that their mission
was “to protect the President” from any political scandal that could affect his
contest with Mitt
Romney, the Republican Presidential Candidate in 2012.39
Victim urges an in-depth investigation into possible organized crime ties, illegal
campaign
financing or other related offences committed by the Obama administration.

39

Mitt Romney’s biography is available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney.

Page
30
7. September 28, 2012
7.1

Victim Undergoes Forced “Socialization” as “Secret Agent”

Victim alleges that his electronic torture continued, but with a new guise – on
this date, Victim
was told using silent communications technology that he was a “secret agent”
working for the
Government of the United States.
Victim states that Torturers at one point on this date told Victim, “You’re a CIA
agent now” and
began what Torturers described as a “socialization” process ostensibly to educate
Victim as an
“agent,” consisting primarily of what Torturers referred to as “Stum Tests,”40
which involved
having Victim attempt to empty his mind of thoughts for extended periods of time.
Torturers told Victim that the so-called “Stum Tests” were designed to gauge the
Victim’s ability
to “empty his mind” so that other “enemy governments” would be unable to probe
Victim’s mind
using remote subvocalization recognition, which is, essentially, a proven “mind
reading”
technology which is described in greater detail later in this Petition.
Victim states that Torturers told Victim “we see what you see, we hear what you
hear.”
Victim states that Torturers, using the aforementioned “silent communications”
technology, told
Victim that they were his “handlers” and that obedience by Victim to Torturers’
demands would
lead to a reduction in further torture or the end of torture, although this was
untrue – the torture
was constantly intensified despite Victim’s best efforts to placate Torturers.
Victim alleges that Torturers would make Victim sit on his couch in his residence
trying not to
think for hours on end. Torturers would brutally chastise and threaten Victim and
his family every
time a stray thought entered his head, making him start a new “Stum Test” every few
minutes,
suggesting that the torture would end if Victim could pass a “Stum Test.”
Victim states that he was told by Torturers that it would help him to keep “Stum,”
or prevent new
thoughts from entering his head, if he constantly visualized a “wire mesh that you
can’t get
through,” or else “a barbed wire fence.”
Victim states that he was told that the purpose of the “Stum Tests” was for the
Victim to be an
effective “CIA agent.”
Victim alleges that, despite constantly trying to follow Torturers’ instructions
and placate his
Torturers, he could never pass a “Stum Test” because thoughts would enter his mind,
and this
form of torture, among others, lasted several weeks.
Victim states that he eventually reached the conclusion that Torturers had no
interest in the
Victim passing a “Stum Test” – Victim concluded that the so-called “Stum Tests”
were designed
to control and “hypnotize” Victim into constant submission and obedience to
Torturers, which
Victim characterizes as being tantamount to “mental enslavement.”
40

To “Keep Stum” means “to keep silent” or “to not talk.”

Page
31
Victim alleges that he was never paid any wages or benefits and was never
officially terminated
as a CIA “employee” as required under Mexican law after being told in Mexican
territory that he
was a “CIA agent,” and that it his intent to file a related lawsuit in 2014 before
a Mexican Labor
Board,41 alleging the corresponding violations of Mexican labor law by the U.S.
Embassy in
Mexico due to the United States Government forcibly “employing” the Victim as a
“CIA agent”
using duress, and then torturing Victim due to his apparent knowledge of the Obama
administration’s organized crime ties.
7.2

Woodward Discusses Secret “Game-Changing” Iraq Technology

Victim notes that reporter Bob Woodward discusses, in an interview with Andrea
Mitchell, a new
and top secret weapons system used during the “surge” of troops during the U.S. war
in Iraq
in 2007.
Woodward says that this weapons system is highly secret, silent and lethal, and
equates the
significance of the development of this weapons system as being tantamount to the
“Manhattan
Project,” which developed the United States’ nuclear bomb.42
Woodward also compares this development to the invention of the tank or airplane in
earlier
wars. “There are secret operational capabilities that have been developed by the
military to
locate, target and kill” adversaries, Woodward told 60 Minutes in 2008.43
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLhOUFYjTDM
Victim notes that Woodward, in the aforementioned interview on the Surge of troops
in Iraq in
2007, states:
“There are newly developed techniques and operations that contributed to the
lowering of violence.
People I talk to say it’s the prime factor…it’s a big deal. You think about the
Manhattan Project in
World Word II to developing the atomic bomb, it was all secret, all of a sudden two
bombs are
dropped on Japan and it’s the end of the war…these techniques and operations, you
are not going
to see or hear, but they are lethal and effective… 85-90% of actionable
intelligence comes from
these techniques and operations…”

Victim asserts that a psychotronic weaponry would meet the description of the new,
silent and
lethal and secret weapons system which provides large amounts and accurate
intelligence
described in the television interview with Woodward above.

Junta Local de Conciliacion y Arbitraje.

Video of Bob Woodward discussing a new top-secret weapons system used in Iraq,
which Victim
states could only be a psychotronic weapons system, in an interview with Andrea
Mitchell, available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLhOUFYjTDM.
43
60 Minutes interview of Bob Woodward available at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/woodwardmilitary-brass-opposed-surge/.
41
42

Page
32
7.3

Attacks on Broadcasters while on Air Chill Media “Mind Control” Coverage

Victim notes that there have been a number of episodes of apparent “brain attacks”
on U.S. and
foreign media which have occurred while reporters have been in the midst of
transmissions of
news reports.
Some examples of this are seen in the following shocking videos of TV reporters and
a possible
wave of brain wave disruption, possibly through transcranial magnetic stimulation
(TMS) or
other similar technology, available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA1pKMtb9tk. A similar video is available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLo43d4JhTU.
Andersen Cooper on CNN also showed signs of what could be a similar possible attack
here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA1pKMtb9tk.
Victim speculates that such possible or seemingly apparent attacks on mass media
reporters
could be one means of intimidating the news media, promoting a chilling effect due
the potential
repercussions of brainwave disruption as a consequence of reporting news on issues
unfavorable to a political party in power.
7.4

“Mind Reading” Using Subvocalization Recognition

Also on this date, Victim states that he discovered that communication with
Torturers was “twoway” and that Torturers, in addition to projecting voices into
his brain using well-documented
remote silent communications technology, could read the Victim’s
“subvocalizations.”44
Subvocalizations are defined as our internal dialogue, or thoughts, when we are
thinking to
ourselves. Subvocalizations are also referred to as “covert speech,” “silent
speech,” or
“imagined speech.”45
Victim asserts that this subvocal recognition and Remote Neural Monitoring
technology detects
the minute electrical currents in the human brain via remote scanning technologies,
also known
as “Functional Neuroimaging.”46
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subvocal_recognition.
According to Wikipedia, “imagined speech (silent speech or covert speech) is
thinking in the form of
sound – “hearing” one’s own voice silently to oneself, without the intentional
movement of any
extremities such as the lips, tongue, or hands. Logically, imagined speech has been
possible since the
emergence of language, however, the phenomenon is most associated with the signal
processing and
detection within electroencephalograph (EEG) data as well as data obtained using
alternative noninvasive, brain–computer interface (BCI) devices.” Available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagined_speech.
46
Functional neuroimaging is the use of neuroimaging technology (primarily what is
known as
“functional” EEG or MRI) to measure an aspect of brain function, often with a view
to understanding
the relationship between activity in certain brain areas and specific mental
functions. Description of
this technology is available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_neuroimaging. Functional
neuroimaging can consist of the use of technologies such as functional magnetic
resonance imaging
(fMRI), functional electroencephalograms (fEEG) and functional positron emission
tomography (PET) to
scan the electromagnetic activity of the brain remotely. Also see a 2008 NBC news
article, titled “Army
44
45

Page
33
Other related technologies include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which uses
electromagnetic currents to disrupt operation of the brain, as noted in the video
available in the
footnote to this sentence.47
Some of the many known capabilities of functional neuroimaging are described in the
following
60 Minutes segment with Lesley Stahl from 2008, available at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5119805n, which Victim states provides an
essential
foundation for understanding the direction of neuroscience and the possible misuse
of this
technology when weaponized.
In the aforementioned 60 Minutes segment, Stahl states:
“Neuroscience research into how we think and what we are thinking is advancing at a
stunning
rate, making it possible for the first time in human history to peer directly into
the brain to read out
the physical makeup of our thoughts - some would say, to read our minds.”

In addition, Victim states that Torturers were able to perform this virtual “mind
reading” of his
“internal dialogue” remotely, possibly using radio telescope technology in
combination with what
is known technically as “subvocalization recognition,” a technology which has been
developed,
among others, by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the
main
military technology research agency of the U.S. government.
According to the Wikipedia entry on “covert speech:”
“In 2008, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) provided a $4
million
grant to the University of California (Irvine), with the intent of providing a
foundation for synthetic
telepathy. According to DARPA, the project “will allow user-to-user communication
on the battlefield
without the use of vocalized speech through neural signals analysis. The brain
generates wordspecific signals prior to sending electrical impulses to the vocal
cords. These imagined
speech signals would be analyzed and translated into distinct words allowing covert
person-toperson communication.”48
Wikipedia added:
Developing Synthetic Telepathy – Similar Technology Marketed as a Way to Control
Video Games by
Thought,“ available at: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27162401/#.UtqgsBDnbIV. This
article states: “A
new Army grant aims to create email or voice mail and send it by thought alone. No
need to type an email, dial a phone or even speak a word. Known as synthetic
telepathy, the technology is based on
reading electrical activity in the brain using an electroencephalograph, or EEG.
Similar technology is
being marketed as a way to control video games by thought.” In addition, an October
28, 2008
segment of the CBS News program 60 Minutes entitled “Mind Reading” describes
amazing advances in
neuroscience imaging, viewable at: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5119805n.
47
Shocking video of TV reporters juxtaposed with video of transcranial magnetic
stimulation available
at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA1pKMtb9tk. More at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=kLo43d4JhTU.
48
Information on DARPA’s synthetic telepathy and subvocalization (covert speech)
programs available
at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagined_speech.

Page
34
“DARPA's program outline has three major goals:



To attempt to identify EEG patterns unique to individual words

To ensure these patterns are common to different users to avoid extensive device
training


To construct a prototype that would decode the signals and transmit them over a
limited
range
Methods for detection

The process for analyzing subjects' silent speech is composed of recording

subjects’ brain waves,
and then using a computer to process the data and determine the content of the
subjects’ covert
speech.
Recording
Subject neural patterns (brain waves) can be recorded using BCI (Brain-Computer
Interface)
devices…”

7.5

DARPA – NASA - Google Patent Subvocalization Recognition Tech

In addition, alluding to the preceding DARPA project, a 2013 article, “Artificial
Telepathy to Create
Pentagon’s Telepathic Soldiers,”49 said:

“known as synthetic telepathy, the technology is based on reading electrical

activity in the brain
using an electroencephalograph, or EEG. Similar technology is being marketed as a
way to control
video games by thought. In April last year, a Dailymail report said a team of UC
Irvine scientists has
been awarded a $4 million grant from the U.S. Army Research Office to study the
neuroscientific
and signal-processing foundations of synthetic telepathy. “I think that this will
eventually become
just another way of communicating,” said Mike D’Zmura, from the University of
California, Irvine
and the lead scientist on the project. “It will take a lot of research, and a lot
of time, but there are
also a lot of commercial applications, not just military applications,” he said. 50

Nearly a decade prior to the aforementioned DARPA research, “subvocalization

recognition”
technology was also developed by the National Space and Aeronautics Administration
(NASA).51 In a 2004 news release, NASA announced “NASA Develops System to
Computerize
Silent, "Subvocal Speech.”52
Eko Armunanto, “Artificial Telepathy to Create Pentagon’s Telepathic Soldiers,”
Digital Journal, 13
May, 2013, available at: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/349839.
50
Ibid.
51
NASA news release “NASA Develops System To Computerize Silent, Subvocal Speech”
available at:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004/mar/HQ_04093_subvocal_speech.html. Statement
issued
March 17, 2004 jointly by John Bluck, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.,
(Phone listed in
release: 650/604-5026). as well as by Michael Braukus, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, (Phone listed
in release: 202/358-1979).
52
Ibid.
49

Page
35
This NASA news release adds:
“NASA scientists have begun to computerize human, silent reading using nerve
signals in the
throat that control speech…."What is analyzed is silent, or subauditory, speech,
such as when
a person silently reads or talks to himself," said Chuck Jorgensen, a scientist
whose team is
developing silent, subvocal speech recognition at NASA's Ames Research Center,
Moffett Field,
Calif. "Biological signals arise when reading or speaking to oneself with or
without actual lip
or facial movement," Jorgensen explained. "A person using the subvocal system
thinks of
phrases and talks to himself so quietly, it cannot be heard, but the tongue and
vocal chords do
receive speech signals from the brain," Jorgensen said.53

In addition, Victim notes that Motorola Mobility, then a subsidiary of Google Inc.,
in 2013 filed
a patent application for a “skin tattoo” capable of reading subvocalizations which
could allow
communication by thought to a mobile phone device using unspoken “voice signals,”
or neural
signals analysis such as those referenced in the DARPA and NASA information
above.54
This Motorola Mobility patent application, No. WO 2013166377 A1, is titled
“Coupling an
electronic skin tattoo to a mobile communication device.”55
Said patent application describes using “the audio signal from the electronic
tattoo to determine
if the audio includes either a voiced or unvoiced component and to determine the
pitch of a voice, should one be detected…a signal processor comprising circuitry
for receiving
vocal signals and comparing to a predetermined pattern…”56
Victim notes that, as described in the NASA news statement cited above, “voice
signals” can be
interpreted to be the minute electrical signals given off by the brain but which
are not spoken –
as is expressed in the above information on DARPA and NASA.
Victim alleges that aforementioned patent application indicates, in essence, that
the thoughts of
human beings could be compared to a database of brainwaves of each person so as to
easily
categorize repeating thoughts using advanced algorithm. Victim states that this
database could
also contain the transcriptions of the recognized subvocalizations of every person
on Earth,
making for classification of thoughts with a high degree of reliability. Victim
notes that aspects of
this theory have been advanced by Dr. John Hall, a board-certified
anesthesiologist, in his 2009
Ibid.
Motorola Mobility’s U.S. patent application No. WO 2013166377 A1, “Coupling an
electronic skin
tattoo to a mobile communication device,” which describes recognition of voice
signals using a “skin
tattoo” is available at https://www.google.com/patents/WO2013166377A1?
cl=en&dq=that+comprises+an+electronic+skin+tattoo+capable+of+being+applied+to+a+thr
oat+r
egion+of+a+body&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tyXaUrLGIufgsATSooKQBw&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAA. Motorola
Mobility was acquired by Lenovo, the world’s largest make of PCs for $2.9 billion
in a deal announced
29 January 2014, according to Bloomberg article available at:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/201401-29/lenovo-said-near-deal-to-buy-google-
handset-unit-for-about-3b.html.
55
Ibid.
56
Ibid.
53
54

Page
36
book “A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America,”57 as well by former CIA
engineering
contractor Dr. Robert Duncan.58
The aforementioned Motorola Mobility patent application is referenced in a January
7, 2014
article on the Extremetech website, titled “Motorola Patents e-Tattoo that can Read
Your
Thoughts by Listening to Unvocalized Words in Your Throat.”
The aforementioned article states that:
“The tattoo they have in mind is actually one that will be emblazoned over your
vocal cords to
intercept subtle voice commands — perhaps even subvocal commands, or even the fully
internal
whisperings that fail to pluck the vocal cords when not given full cerebral
approval. One might even
conclude that they are not just patenting device communications from a patch of
smartskin, but
communications from your soul.”59

Victim notes that the senior vice president at Motorola Mobility until its sale in
Jan. 2014 to
Lenovo was Regina E. Dugan, where her charge was to build and lead the Advanced
Technology & Projects (ATAP) group. Dugan has remained as an executive with Google
following the sale of Motorola Mobility.60
Victim notes that Dugan specializes in advanced “remote sensing” technology and she
formally
served as Director of the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA)
from July 2009 to March 2012.61
Victim notes that DARPA is the main technology research agency of the United States
Military,
which suggests to Victim that Dugan is intimately familiar with secret and advanced
technology
Dr. John Hall, “A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism, 2009, in America,” available at
http://www.satweapons.com/. Hall’s biography available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hall_(physician).
58
Robert Duncan, “The Matrix Deciphered,” 2006, available at:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_matrix57.htm.
59
An article which describes the technology, “Motorola patents e-tattoo that can read
your thoughts by
listening to unvocalized words in your throat,” is available at:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/171992-motorola-patents-e-tattoo-that-can-read-
your-thoughtsby-listening-to-unvocalized-words-in-your-throat.
60
Ina Fried, “Lenovo Won’t Get Regina Dugan’s Advanced Research Group in Motorola
Deal,”
Recode.net, January 29, 2014, available at: http://recode.net/2014/01/29/lenovo-
apparently-notgetting-regina-dugans-advanced-research-group-in-2-91-billion-
motorola-deal/.
61
According to Wikipedia entry on Regina Dugan: “Dugan (born March 19, 1963) is an
American
inventor and businesswoman. She served as the 19th Director of the Defense Advanced
Research
Projects Agency (DARPA). She was appointed to that position on July 20, 2009 and
was the first female
DARPA director. In March 2012, she left her position to take an executive role at
Google,” available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regina_E._Dugan#cite_note-darpa_bio-1A. DARPA official
biography of
Dugan reads: “Experienced in counterterrorism and defense against explosive
threats, Dr. Dugan first
served the Nation as a DARPA program manager from 1996 to 2000. During this first
tour with the
Agency, she directed a diverse $100 million portfolio of programs including the
“Dog’s Nose” program,
an effort focused on the development of an advanced, field-portable system for
detecting the
explosive content of land mines.” http://www.darpa.mil/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?
id=2391.
57

Page
37
developed or implemented by DARPA, including advanced “subvocalization recognition”
and
other psychotronic technologies.
Victim states that additional information on subvocal recognition technology is
provided in
sections 12 and 17 of this Petition.

8. September 29 – October 31, 2012

8.1

Ongoing Threats to Family Members

During this period, Victim was constantly subjected to electronic torture using
silent
communications technology.
Victim alleges that Torturers, for an entire day, played digitally synthesized
recordings using
voices of Victim’s daughter and her mother, with Victim’s daughter being raped and
her mother
being murdered by gunshot. Victim later was able to confirm safety of family
members.
Victim alleges that he was repeatedly threatened with electronic torture,
kidnapping and
hospitalization of his then 11-year-old daughter and her mother, who continue to
reside in
Mexico, and agents claiming to be from the CIA, NSA and DOD said that they would
electronically torture his family for the rest of their lives, or murder them and
make their deaths
appear to be suicides.
Victim alleges that there were also constant threats that he and his entire family,
including a 1year-old daughter of the Victim in the Philippines and her mother, as
well as associates of the
Victim, would be murdered by the CIA or its contractors.
Victim alleges that Torturers repeatedly threatened Victim with being placed on a
“Terror List”
and that his family members and business would be placed on such a list, which
Torturers said
would restrict victim’s ability to travel or make it impossible for him to carry
out financial
transactions required for operation of his business.
Torturers repeatedly threatened to damage Victim’s business interests, saying that
they would
“strangle” him financially. Torturers told Victim that his United States Passport
had been
revoked, leaving him stateless (again, this was apparently untrue; Victim has
continued to travel
on his U.S. passport).
8.2

Prominent individuals named during torture sessions

Torturers for several weeks conducted the aforementioned “Stum Tests” several times
a day,
promising that the torture would end if Victim could successfully complete a single
“Stum Test,”
which Victim states he was never able to do, because the parameters of the “Stum
Tests” would
constantly change.
Page
38
Victim alleges that Torturers threatened to defame him and portray him as a
criminal, saying that
they would “coke his house,” which they explained to mean planting cocaine in his
apartment,
and have Victim arrested by Mexican authorities and his home and businesses seized.
Victim alleges that Torturers said they would defame and discredit Victim by
claiming that he
is/was a criminal, insane, or that he had taken narcotics or other drugs to explain
any action to
resist or expose Torturers or his apparent knowledge of organized crime connections
to the
Obama administration.
Victim alleges that Torturers told Victim that he was deeply involved in the U.S.
and Mexican
“economy,” which Torturers explained to mean “organized crime,” though Victim
states
unequivocally that he has no organized crime connections or criminal associations.
Victim states that CIA Torturers were particularly perturbed at the mention of New
York real
estate financier John Zuccotti in Victim’s biographical information, stating that
Zuccotti was
heavily involved in the U.S. economy and that he was the “chairman of the board of
the
chairmen of the board,” which Victim understood to mean that Zuccotti was very
highly placed in
the United States financial community.
Victim was allegess that he was told by his ostensibly CIA torturers that various
political figures
were aware of “every detail of this situation,” including senior presidential
advisor Valerie Jarrett
(who was said to be giving orders from the White House), Senator Saxby Chambliss
and
Senator Diane Feinstein (to whom he addressed the letter that appears that the end
of this
account), Senator John McCain, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Bill and Hillary
Clinton, George
Soros and many other prominent individuals, and that that these individuals either
“supported”
his torture or opposed it based on their political calculations. Victim has no way
of verifying
these statements by his torturers and doubts their veracity.
Victim alleges that Torturers told Victim that before torture began, he had been
selected to “look
out for Barack’s business” in Mexico, which was explained to Victim as meaning
organized
crime interests, including narcotics trafficking. However, Victim alleges,
Torturers told him that
they were “teaching a lesson” to Victim because Victim had searched for a picture
of the
American Banker.
Torturers repeatedly threatened to “suicide” Victim by using electromagnetic means
to damage
his mental processes, administering toxic pharmaceuticals to make his death appear
selfinflicted, or else that Victim would be given “medical leave” – which Torturers
explained as
meaning being injected with mind-altering medication to damage his mental processes
by CIA,
NSA or DoD agents or contractors, for the purpose of leaving him hospitalized for
life in a
mental institution.
Victim has also been repeatedly threatened with “medical leave,” or relentless
torture designed
to leave him permanently institutionalized.

Page
39
8.3

Police Complaint Filed Against CIA

Victim filed a complaint with the Mexico City police department against the Central
Intelligence
Agency in order to document, in a general manner, the threats being made against
him.62 (Copy
attached).
As Victim gradually succumbed to constant torture, Torturers gloated that they had
“infantilized”
Victim, reducing his personality to a childlike, moldable state, and also that they
had
“sexualized” victim as a result of torture, causing Victim to briefly have bizarre
sexual
hallucinations.
Victim alleges that, in an effort to flee his torturers and fearing for his
personal safety, Victim
made five attempts to leave Mexico during this period via the Mexico City Airport
(Benito Juárez
International Airport).
During each attempt to purchase airline ticket at said airport, Torturers would
confuse and
frighten Victim using silent sound communication so that he would not leave Mexico,
saying that
he would be arrested if he returned to the United States and was on a “Terror List”
preventing
Victim from travelling internationally and that Victim was being followed by
“secret agents.”
Torturers dissuaded Victim from purchasing airline ticket via Internet, saying that
“enemy
governments” would know Victim’s plans and intercept him during his travels.
In addition, Victim alleges that he was threatened with murder on three separate
occasions by
persons with American accents during these attempts to leave Mexico while in the
Mexico City
airport.
On the first occasion, two Caucasian males with American accents threatened to
“shoot” Victim
at loading/unloading area outside Mexico City airport. On second occasion,
Caucasian man
passing Victim said with American accent, “I want to murder you.” On third
occasion, Caucasian
man with long curly hair said to Victim, with American accent, “I wish I had a
gun,” as Victim
passed.
Victim states that the Mexico City Airport should have security video and audio of
the
above incidents and urges investigation of such video records. Victim alleges that
he did not
learn the identity of threatening individuals, but that he deduced that, given the
circumstances,
they could be American agents persecuting Victim because of his apparent knowledge
of the
Obama administration’s organized crime ties.
Victim alleges that Torturers repeatedly threatened that automated “programs would
be run” to
transmit excruciating sounds or emotions directly to Victim’s brain using advanced
mind control
technology, known as "computerized telepathy” or "synthetic telepathy,”63 which
Torturers said
The complaint, filed on October 3, 2012 with the Mexico City Prosecutor’s Office,
reads: “in recent
days, I have received a number of threats from agents of the Central Intelligence
Agency of the United
States which include murder, kidnapping, making my death appear a suicide,
injecting me with
substances to impair my mental processes…” A copy of this complaint is attached to
the end of this
Petition.
62

Page
40
would damage Victim’s mental processes and render him hospitalized, no longer a
threat to the
Obama administration.
Victim alleges that he received threats from Torturers that clandestine agencies
would ruin his
business, blocking communication and blocking traffic to his Internet sites, as
well as hacking
his e-mail and bank accounts.

9. October 31, 2012 – December 9, 2012

9.1

Victim Tortured in Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua…

On October 31, 2012, Victim was finally able to resist torture sufficiently to
purchase airline
ticket and depart Mexico for San José, Costa Rica, where Victim’s mother resides.
Victim was electronically tortured with threats while airborne, as well as while in
transit through
the Panama City airport, and was continuously remotely tortured by the same
Torturers in the
country of Costa Rica, in largely the same terms as described on previous dates.
Mainly, Torturers would repeatedly threaten Victim and his family with violence and
that he
would extradited to the United States for unspecified or manufactured offences,
such as having
sent a threatening letter forged in Victim’s hand to President Obama.
Victim alleges that, on one occasion, Torturers awoke Victim at 3:00 a.m. while in
San José and
told Victim that Costa Rican police were en route to detain him so he would be
extradited to the
United States for an unspecified offense.
Torturers advised Victim to flee at that time to the Costa Rican city of Liberia by
bus, which
Victim states he did not do. Victim states that there was no such action by Costa
Rican police,
and that, as in virtually all cases, torture was limited to causing severe
psychological distress to
Victim, rather than actual physical actions.
Victim alleges that, during this period, psychological torture consisting of
constant threats was
ongoing and that Victim was so brutalized by torture that Victim began to
contemplate suicide in
order to cease torture.

See 2008 NBC news article, titled “Army Developing Synthetic Telepathy – Similar
Technology
Marketed as a Way to Control Video Games by Thought,“ available at:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27162401/#.UtqgsBDnbIV. This article states: “A new Army
grant aims to
create email or voice mail and send it by thought alone. No need to type an e-mail,
dial a phone or
even speak a word. Known as synthetic telepathy, the technology is based on reading
electrical
activity in the brain using an electroencephalograph, or EEG.” See also Information
on DARPA’s
synthetic telepathy and subvocalization (covert speech) programs available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagined_speech.
63
Page
41
10. December 10, 2012 – December 12, 2012
10.1 A Public Suicide in Legitimate Protest
Victim alleges that after nearly 3 months of torture by PSY-OPS psychological
warfare
operatives claiming to be from the CIA, NSA and DoD, he made the obviously
difficult decision
to take his life in order to cease torture.
Victim asserts that he ultimately decided to take his life publically as a form of
protest against
the constant torture and threats against Victim and Victim’s innocent family.
Victim alleges that Torturers repeatedly told him that his mother would be murdered
by U.S.
agents and that Victim would be blamed, prompting him to commit suicide in order to
save his
mother’s life.
Victim alleges that as a result of these and other threats, he was incited to
suicide on 4
occasions during this 3-day period, including one failed suicide attempt with
pharmaceuticals
(20+ tablets of beta blocker Atenolol) and 3 failed suicide attempts using a knife
to cut his throat.
Victim states that for final suicide attempt, he planned to kill himself in front
of a mass media
outlet in public protest of his continuous and brutal torture.
Victim states that on December 12, 2012, he used a “boxcutter” knife to cut his own
throat
outside of the La Nacion Newspaper in San José, Costa Rica. Victim states that La
Nacion
newspaper should have dramatic, grisly photos – a photographer was present - and
security
camera video footage and numerous witnesses. Victim states that this public suicide
attempt,
reminiscent to him of Buddhist monks who have used self-immolation to protest
Chinese
occupation of Tibet, was interrupted by Costa Rican police forces.64
Victim alleges that his Torturers actively encouraged him to commit suicide,
psychologically
torturing Victim, saying “there’s a pulse point, John, there’s a pulse point”
repeatedly as Victim
attempted to locate and sever an artery in his own neck.
Victim alleges that Torturers also threatened to rape and kill Victim’s daughter
and her mother,
and kill Victim’s mother if Victim did not complete suicide attempt.
Victim states that he was able to cut his jugular vein and begged his rescuers to
remove
pressure from his wounds and allow him to die in order to cease torture.
Victim alleges that he wanted to die because of the deep psychological and
emotional damage
inflicted through ongoing torture by psychological operations professionals using
so-called

Over 120 Tibetans have self-immolated in Tibet and China since February 27, 2009 in
protest of
Chinese intervention in the nation. Reference available at:
https://www.savetibet.org/resources/factsheets/self-immolations-by-tibetans/.
64

Page
42
“Voice of God” or “Voice to Skull” (also known as V2K) silent communications mind
control
technology against him, which is described in greater detail in section 12 of this
Petition.65
Victim was hospitalized December 12, 2012, in Hospital Mexico in Costa Rica where
he
underwent emergency surgery as a result of his wounds to his neck and jugular vein,
receiving
a total of 48 stitches. Victim notes that his blood test was free of any illicit
drugs when tested at
Hospital Mexico. Victim subsequently had a normal CAT Scan and EEG at Hospital
Mexico.
10.2 Victim Seeks Relief, Exposure of U.S. Neuroweapon WMD Use
Victim alleges that he made his public suicide attempts, and is filing this
Petition, because he
was made to understand that he could not win against the torture and power of the
United
States Government, the CIA, NSA, DoD and other unknown or secret agencies which
Victim
states have extra-legally persecuted him.
Victim states that his intent in filing this Petition is to seek relief from
torture purportedly inflicted
by agents or contractors of the Obama administration, the United States of America
and its
clandestine agencies, which have taken extremely damaging actions against his
innocent
person, separating him from his family, torturing him with threats against his and
his family’s
security, lives and business interests, threatening to prosecute him for fabricated
criminal
offences and inciting him to suicide on four occasions.
Victim states that he is also seeking to expose the use of psychotronic weapons
systems by the
United States of America on foreign and domestic populations.
Victim alleges that psychotronic weapons systems have been perfected so that any
person on
Earth can be singled out and tortured using such technology, a gross violation of
international
law which puts the fundamental human rights every individual on Earth at risk for
remote
monitoring, torture or virtual enslavement.66
Victim states that rapid developments in technology make the peril of neuroweapons
a matter in
need of urgent attention by multilateral organizations such as the Organization of
American
States (which condemned the use of electronic weaponry against the ousted President
of
Honduras in 2009),67 the European Parliament and the United Nations.
Victim notes that the Asian Human Rights Commission has stated that:

“Voice of God” or “Voice to Skull” (also known as V2K) are terms given by the U.S.
Army to electronic
weaponry able to project voices in the brains of victims. This technology is
described in greater depth
in point 12 of this Petition.
66
Interview with Dr. Robert Duncan, a former CIA engineer who participated in the
U.S. psychotronic
weapons program, available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsVd0mbjoAg.
67
Organization of American States (OAS) “CONDEMNATION OF THE ACTS OF INTIMIDATION
AGAINST
THE EMBASSY OF BRAZIL IN HONDURAS,” (Approved by the OAS Permanent Council at its
meeting of
October 21, 2009) available at: http://www.oas.org/consejo/resolutions/dec43.asp.
65

Page
43
“The threat is real…(there are) many indications that brain technology for
neuroweapons is
scientifically possible. Additionally, some say such technologies have been used
systematically
against select people in various jurisdictions.”68

Victim states that he is also filing this Petition because it is of vital

importance for human rights,
human dignity and legality that this information be dissimulated and the nations
and peoples of
the world become aware of the unlawful reach of America’s clandestine agencies
using socalled “mind control” technology, including Remote Neural Monitoring,
advanced “subvocal
recognition” (SVR) to read and record one’s thoughts, and Silent Sound Spread
Spectrum or
similar microwave or UHF technology for using silent communications to inflict so-
called “notouch” torture.69
Victim alleges that he had lost hope of being able to survive this situation since,
purportedly
through the CIA, NSA and DoD, the Obama administration and the Government of the
United
States had insisted that they would never leave him in peace because of the secret
that he has
about the Banker possibly being a “Mob Godfather” with a financial or personal
connection to
President Obama or Obama’s campaign donors.
Victim alleges that many Mexicans in the neighborhoods of Cuauhtémoc, Juárez, and
Condesa
in Mexico City have knowledge of the situation described by Victim, and that he
fears for the
lives of his family members, who his Torturers state are under constant threat.
10.3 Widespread U.S. Embassy Involvement
Victim also asserts that there is widespread knowledge and awareness of Victim’s
torture,
situation and circumstances among the staff of the United States Embassy in Mexico
City,
including among representatives of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the
Embassy, among
many others, and Victim strongly urges the OAS Human Rights Commission to recommend
to
the Government of the United States an extensive, in-depth investigation into
knowledge of
Victim’s torture among officials with the United States Embassy in Mexico City
during the period
of Victim’s torture.
Victims alleges that Torturers claiming to be agents of the CIA, NSA and DoD told
him
repeatedly that they would invent criminal charges against him, such as conspiracy
or having
ties to organized crime which he does not have.
Victims alleges that he was also told that he was going to be accused of crimes
that he did not
commit, such as murder or rape using DNA collected from his house, and others, and
Torturers
claimed to have made a falsified letter in Victims handwriting threatening the
President of the
United States.
See September 27, 2013 statement from the Asian Human Rights Commission on
neuroweapons,
available at: http://www.humanrights.asia/news/ahrc-news/AHRC-STM-174-2013.
69
Cheryl Welsh, “Torture Magazine,” Asian and Global Perspectives, Volume 2, Issue 2,
June - August
2013, p. 45. Welsh has been recognized as a non-lethal weaponry expert by the
United Nations
Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR).
68

Page
44
Victim states that for the above reasons Victim was incited to take the drastic
action of a public
suicide attempt in legitimate protest against the Obama administration and its
actions against
Victim and his family.
Victim states that he regards his incited suicide attempts as being tantamount to
attempted
murder, and urges an in-depth investigation into the allegations presented here in
order to
identify and prosecute the authorities responsible.

11. December 13, 2012 – Date of filing of this Petition

Victim alleges that he has continued to be continuously electronically tortured
following his final
suicide attempt, largely in the same terms as described previously, including with
continuous
and ongoing threats to physically and/or psychologically harm and/or torture Victim
and Victim’s
family members.
Victim alleges that, while in hospital recovering from critical wounds resulting
from his final
suicide attempt, Torturers continuously, using silent communications technology,
threatened
Victim’s family members and incited Victim to attempt to remove stiches from his
neck while
recuperating (which Victim attempted but was unable to do).
Torturers using silent sound communication also told Victim that hospital
attendants were “CIA
Agents” and that his intravenous medication had been contaminated to poison and
kill Victim or
damage his mental processes and leave Victim institutionalized.
11.1 Letters to Mexican Congress, Embassies in Mexico
Victim states that, on February 11, 2013, in an effort to expose the apparent
corruption and
malfeasance of the Obama administration and its ongoing torture of Victim, and in
an effort to
make torture of Victim stop, Victim wrote 600 letters to the Mexican Congress and
to foreign
embassies and multilateral organizations in Mexico explaining his situation in
general terms.
Among other things, said letter, originally written in Spanish and dated Feb. 11,
2013, states
(translated):
…“On September 25 of last year, I was contacted by a Mafia banker who mentioned a
connection
with Barack Obama. I do not know his name, but he mentioned that the United States
had invested
heavily in me because I helped to calm the violence in Mexico.
Does Obama have ties to the Godfather?
I have never had anything to do with organized crime and I never received money
from that
Banker, who was very tall, 6’6” or more, thin, with grey hair and a hawk face. But
later I heard
rumors that he was the “Godfather.”
Since that date, I have been constantly threatened and tortured by agencies of the
United States
government, who have identified themselves mainly as being with the CIA and the
National
Page
45
Security Agency (NSA), including a woman who identified herself as Clarissa or
Larissa Lenox
(probably a false name).
I was threatened with kidnapping in front of the United States Embassy in front of
Mexican police
witnesses, and in addition I was threatened with murder on three separate occasions
by apparent
CIA agents in the Mexico City airport (the government should have video), since I
was attempting
to leave the country due to my fear that the information I possess was possibly
damaging to the
United States government.
Nevertheless, due to the terror caused by these agents in the airport, I was unable
to leave until
October 31, 2012 for Costa Rica.
Since then, I have continued to receive multiple threats of kidnapping, torture,
murder and being
injected with medication to alter my mental processes by CIA agents, to leave me
hospitalized for
life. I have also been threatened that my death would be made to appear a suicide,
and that the
CIA would “run programs” on my brain to damage my mental processes.
I have also been threatened constantly with torture, kidnapping and hospitalization
of my daughter,
an 11-year old American citizen and her mother, who continue to reside in Mexico,
and that they
could be tortured for the rest of their lives, or that their deaths would be made
to appear to be
suicides.”

11.2 Mysterious Death of Victim’s Closest Associate

Shortly after drafting the aforementioned letter to the Mexican Congress and
Embassies in
Mexico, Victim alleges that his laptop computer was remotely destroyed using
Victim’s Internet
connection. Victim alleges that Torturers told Victim at the time through silent
communications
technology that, “We fried your motherboard.”
Upon servicing the laptop unit, Victim was told that not only was computer’s
motherboard
destroyed, but also the hard drive, keyboard and other components of the laptop
computer had
been rendered totally unusable, requiring replacement, and that all data on the
computer had
been irretrievably lost.
Victim alleges that electronic torture in the terms described in this and previous
points have
continued during this period, at least up to the date of filing of this Petition.
Victim states that, as
he has drafted this Petition, Torturers have constantly threatened him and his
family members,
including repeatedly asking Victim: “What the fuck are trying to do to the American
presidency?”
and stating that the Victim would be remotely killed by disrupting electromagnetic
fields in his
brain or heart, or else be placed on “medically leave” by altering the normal
functioning of
Victim’s brain and rendering him institutionalized.
Victim alleges that during this period, he was also tortured in the OAS member
State of
Nicaragua.

Page
46
Victim states that Torturers have repeatedly threatened to "prosecute you for
everything you
have ever done for the rest of your short life.”
Victim states that the death of Victim’s closest associate, Rocio Ruiz Ramirez (who
was killed in
late 2013 in what was reported to be an accidental death), could be related to
Victim’s apparent
knowledge of the Obama administration’s organized crime ties. 70 Victim urges an
investigation
into the death of Rocio Ruiz Ramirez.
Victim alleges that Torturers have claimed alternately that they use offshore U.S.
bases, are
based at sea, or that since he is a U.S. citizen abroad, the United States
Constitution does not
apply to Victim.

12. Overview of Development of Psychotronic Weaponry

Victim states that so-called “psychotronic weapons” -- or weapons of mass
destruction (WMDs)
whose purpose is to directly affect the human brain -- have been the U.S.
government´s main
tool for depriving Victim of his fundamental human rights as guaranteed under OAS
Human
Rights Treaties.71
Victim states that the very nature of neuroweapons makes it impossible to detect
outward
evidence of their use. Therefore, he attempts to provide ample evidence of the
existence of
neuroweapons and their use, in an effort to dispel, to the extent possible, doubts
which may
reasonably arise over the existence and use of such technology.
Victim states that psychotronic weapons can also be referred to variously as
neuroweapons,
electronic weaponry, electromagnetic weaponry, frequencies, radio-frequency (RF),
radio
signals, radio waves, microwaves, microwave signals, low-frequency, extremely low
frequency
(ELF), ELF frequencies, electromagnetic fields or non-lethal mind control weaponry,
among
many other terms.72
12.1 Neuroweapons More Powerful than Nuclear Bomb
Victim states that is well documented that the human brain and body are
electrochemical
biological systems that communicate with electrical, magnetic and electromagnetic
signals, 73
and that psychotronic weapons are designed to detect, collect and/or alter
electromagnetic
radiation (EMR) in these bioelectrical systems.74
Rocio Ruiz Ramirez was killed during this period in an apparent malfunction of a
hot water “boiler” in
her home; article on her death is available at:
http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/ciudadmetropoli/2013/encender-boiler-lanza-flamazo-
muere-971308.html.
71
Cheryl Welsh, NEUROWEAPONS: Inside Story of the mind control project , Torture
Magazine, Asian
and Global Perspectives, Volume 2, Issue 2, June-August 2013, available at:
http://www.humanrights.asia/resources/journals-magazines/torture-asian-and-
globalperspectives/TortureV02N0203.
72
Ibid, p. 44.
73
Paul Rosch and Marko Markov, ed. Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, (New York: M. Dekker,
2004).
74
Timothy L. Thomas, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92. Available at:
http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/98spring/thomas.
htm.
70

Page
47
Victim notes that psychotronic weapons are repeatedly referred to in academic and
military
research as having the potential to be “more powerful than nuclear weapons.”
Victim states that psychotronic weapons or neuroweapons are normally top secret
armaments
in national governments’ arsenals and that, due to their invisible nature,
governments would
naturally seek to keep such weaponry highly classified and deny its existence.
However, Victim states that there are exceptions, such as, for example, the U.S.
military’s
unclassified silent sound MEDUSA project,75 which is discussed in greater detail in
section 16
of this Petition.
For example, Cheryl Welsh, who has been recognized as a non-lethal weaponry expert
by the
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR),76 writes in a 2012
article for the
Essex Human Rights Review:
“This paper examines how and why all major reforms efforts to ban nonconsensual
experiments
have failed. It examines emerging evidence of secret neuroweapons; neuroscience-
based
weapons that may be comparable to the atomic bomb and the significant danger of
further
nonconsensual experiments being carried out today.” 77

Alluding to the importance of secrecy of neuroweapons for national governments,

Welsh added
in the same Essex Human Rights Review article:
“decades of secret research supports the argument that, unlike the atomic bomb -
which became
known to the public when it exploded over Japan - some EMR neuroweapons are likely
be
surreptitious intelligence weapons, whose power lies in keeping them secret.
Surreptitious
weapons would likely remain classified, never to be revealed to the public; they
would be silent,
undetectable, and leave no trace evidence behind - thus creating a more ominous
threat to
fundamental human rights than the atomic bomb.”78

Russian President Vladimir Putin has also stated that psychotronic weaponry is
potentially
more powerful than nuclear weapons.79
MEDUSA is a project developed by the U.S. Navy, first contracted to the Los
Angeles-based
Waveband Corporation, which was purchased in 2008 by the Sierra Nevada Corporation.
Available at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MEDUSA_(weapon).
76
Cheryl Welsh is cited as an expert in non-lethal weaponry in the United Nations
Institute for
Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament in Geneva, 25.
Available at:
http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/2002-media-guide-to-disarmament-in-
geneva-95.pdf.
77
Cheryl Welsh, “Cold War Nonconsensual Experiments: The Threat of Neuroweapons and
the Danger it
will Happen Again,” Essex Human Rights Review, 1. Available at:
http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V9N1/WELSH.pdf
78
Ibid. p. 31
79
Putin made this statement in Rossiiskaya Gazeta in a 20 February 2012 article
etitled “Being strong:
National security guarantees for Russia,” authored by Putin, available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120312153358/http://premier.gov.ru/eng/events/news/18
185/.
75

Page
48
12.2 Radio Telepathy a Focus of Neuroscience and the U.S. Military
In 2010, prominent physicist Freeman Dyson discussed the significance of EMR for
understanding how the brain functions:
“To make radiotelepathy possible, we have only to invent two new technologies,
first the direct
conversion of neural signals into radio signals and vice versa, and second the
placement of
microscopic radio transmitters and receivers within the tissue of a living
brain...It is easy to imagine
radiotelepathy as a powerful instrument of social change, used either for good or
for evil purposes.
It could be a basis for mutual understanding and peaceful cooperation of humans all
over the
planet. Or it could be a basis for tyrannical oppression and enforced hatred
between one
communal society and another.“80

Victim asserts that, due to innovations in radio telescopes and radio frequency
technology, as
well as dramatic advances in neuroimaging technology,81 the implantation of
“microscopic radio
transmitters and receivers” that Dyson discusses above are not a technical
requirement for
radiotelepathy to take place.
Victim speculates that powerful arrays of radio telescopes and transmitters,
possibly spacebased in the U.S. reconnaissance satellite system, can remotely
access, or “hack” the human
brain by reading the minute electromagnetic signals given off by brainwaves.82
Because of the “invisible” nature of psychotronic / electromagnetic weaponry,
Victim states that,
throughout the remainder of this Petition, extensive references are provided as
evidence that
psychotronic weaponry is technically feasible and has already been deployed by the
United
States Military, including in Gulf War I in 1991, as well as the 2nd Iraq War
during the so-called
“surge” in 2007.83 Media reports of evidence of such usage are presented in section
17 of this
Petition.

Freeman Dyson, "Radiotelepathy: Direct Communication from Brain to Brain," in This

Will Change
Everything: Ideas that will shape the future, John Brockman, ed., (New York: Harper
Perennial, 2010),
146-147, Excerpt available at: http://www.edge.org/response-detail/10313. See also
Committee on
Military and Intelligence Methodology for Emergent Neurophysiological and
Cognitive/Neural Science
Research in the Next Two Decades, “Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related
Technologies,”
National Research Council, (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008), 2-3.
Available at:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12177&page=12.
81
60 Minutes video on “Mind Reading” detailing stunning advances in neuroscience and
remote
neuroimaging which allows for remote reading of thoughts, reported by Lesley Stahl,
is available at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5119805n.
82
M. A. Persinger, “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by
Electromagnetic
Induction of Fundamental Algorithms,” Perception and Motor Skills, June 1995.
Available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396.
83
Reporter Bob Woodward discusses in an interview with Andrea Mitchell a new and top
secret
weapons system used during the “surge” of troops during the U.S. war in Iraq in
2007. Woodward says
that this weapons system is highly secret, silent and lethal, equates the
significance of the
development of this weapons system as being tantamount to “The Manhattan Project,”
which
developed the nuclear bomb. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=wLhOUFYjTDM.
80

Page
49
There is plentiful additional evidence that the U.S. military has a strong focus on
neuroscience
and new psychotronic weaponry.
A 2008 report on neuroscience and its weaponization, contracted by the Defense
Intelligence
Agency,84 said:
“DARPA has been working on EEG and fNIRS-based BCIs (brain – computer interfaces)
that use
the human visual system as the input device to a computer system to increase the
speed of data
processing in visual search mode. The idea is that although current technological
capacities with
computer vision are not even close to the speed and sophistication of the human
eye, there is a lag
time between the visual mental process and a motor output to the computer system.
By using EEG
or fNIRS to directly measure the brain’s response when it detects a target, the
search process can
occur more quickly than with an operator’s motor response. Given the current level
of
miniaturization of computer memory, a wearable computer with an efficient brain-
based input/output
device (a “mental mouse”) and an efficient search strategy could allow access to
huge amounts of
stored data in milliseconds, effectively augmenting the user’s long-term memory.
Such devices
could allow military troops to access visual maps and intelligence when they
approach a new area
or to access medical information in the field.85
“Owing to their awkward size and shape and their cost, some technologies such as
MEG and
MRI/fMRI are likely to take a backseat in enabling cognitive enhancement, providing
the underlying
neuroscience upon which more fieldable technologies, such as EEG and fNIRS, can be
based. It
is, for example, unlikely that brain–computer interfaces based on fMRI could be
loaded onto jets or
spaceships in the next two decades, whereas an EEG or fNIRS-based system could very
well be
so deployed in that timeframe.”
The report added:
“These functional neuroimaging technologies, some mature, others emergent, are
commonplace in
research and clinical environments and are having an impact on defense policy
decisions (Peters
et al., 2008). Recent advances and developments allow for functional neuroimaging
capability with
real-time or near-real-time data acquisition and analysis that is becoming cheaper,
portable, and
more user friendly. Continued refinement of these technologies is likely to lead to
increased
dissemination of this technology, with applications expanding well beyond the
current primary fields
of neuroscience research and clinical medicine. Areas where the application of
advanced functional
neuroimaging technology are likely are business (marketing, economics, human
resources), human
performance, risk assessment, the field of law, and the military, all of them
having great relevance
to national policy and defense issues. Progress continues to be made in both
functional
neuroimaging and neurophysiological methods toward the holy grail of neuroimaging,
namely,
millisecond-level temporal resolution with precise spatial localization.
“Advances in neurophysiological and cognitive science research have fueled a surge
of research
aimed at more effectively combining human and machine capabilities. Results of this
research
“CURRENT COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY,” National Research
Council,
Aug. 13, 2008, p. 52, available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12177.
85
Ibid.
84

Page
50
could give human performance an edge at both the individual and group levels.
Though much of
this research defies being assigned rigid boundaries between disciplines, for the
sake of
convenience the committee has organized this section into four discussion areas:
There is no
doubt in the mind of the committee members that genomics and proteomics will play
an
increasingly large role in the future of cognitive neuroscience. However, given the
fact that
genomics/proteomics is largely recognized by the entire technical community as
being important,
and appears to be growing, the committee decided to not add a finding related to
this topic.
• Brain-machine interfaces. This category includes direct brain-machine interfaces
for control of
hardware and software. The basis of brain-machine interfaces (BMI) is the capture
of various forms
of dynamically varying energy emissions from the working brain by means of
functional
neuroimaging devices.”86
Also, the report said, “A fourth example is a brain-machine interface (BMI) for the
control of
Weapons systems. With breakthroughs in training and the detection of brain activity
for BMIs to the
required level of complexity and specificity, virtually any conceivable weapons
system could be
controlled by this means.”87
Victim notes that the above research was performed over 6 years before filing of
this Petition,
accessing non-classified advances in neuroscience, and that DARPA and other covert
government
agencies are known to be 20-30 years ahead of the private sector and academia,
suggesting that
the actual state of neuroweapons development is far more advanced then is believed,
even by
ostensible experts.

13. Three Main Components of Neuroweapons

Victim states that research into psychotronic weaponry indicates that the principle
capabilities of
these weapons systems include, but are not limited to, the following technologies:
a) Silent speech communication technology designed to project voices directly into
the
human brain, such as “Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS)” (one such technology
was patented by the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of
the
U.S. Air Force, in 2002,88 and the weaponization of such technology exists in an
unclassified form as the MEDUSA project – see section 17 of this Petition); 89
b) “Subvocal Recognition,” or the capacity to “read” a person’s internal thoughts
(such
technology, discussed previously in this petition, was originally developed by NASA
patent pending - and a 2013 patent application by Motorola Mobility provides for an

Ibid. p 84.
Ibid. 161.
88
Patent 6,470,214 B1, U.S. Patent Office, 22 October 2002 (U.S. Air Force Research
Laboratory)
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE RADIO FREQUENCY HEARING EFFECT, available
at:
https://www.google.com/patents/US6470214?
dq=6,470,214&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0i3YUvvrHMKgkAfnqYCgBg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
89
Patent available at: http://www.google.com/patents/US6587729.
86
87

Page
51
“electronic tattoo” able to communicate subvocalizations to a mobile communications
device);90
c) “Remote Neural Monitoring,” or the capacity to “see what the subject sees and
hear
what the subject hears,” by accessing the visual and auditory cortexes which, as
with
remote subvocalization recognition as described in point b), Victim speculates is
carried out using an array of highly sensitive space-based radio telescopes present
in
the U.S. reconnaissance satellite system (further details on the theory that
satellitemounted radio telescopes can be used to detect minute electromagnetic
signals from
living beings on Earth are provided in section 20 of this Petition).

All of these psychotronic / neuroweapons systems function by transmitting

microwave, ELF,
UHF, VHF or similar electromagnetic radiation, as well as detecting the minute
electrical signals
given off by the electrochemical/ electromagnetic processes in the human brain.
Victim also provides a number of detailed references regarding the technologies
involved in
psychotronic weapons below.
These references include:
aa) statements/ actions by U.S. and global public officials and/or governmental or
multilateral
agencies,
bb) excerpts from selected academic articles on psychotronic weapons,
dd) psychotronic weaponry potential of the U.S. BRAIN initiative,
ee) evidence of military development of psychotronic weapons,
ff) selected reports on actual military use of this weaponry,
gg) selected patents with applications for psychotronic weaponry,
hh) comments on the phenomenon of “Targeted Individuals,” and
ii) speculation on the functioning of the U.S. psychotronic weapons system.

14. Statements by U.S. and multilateral bodies regarding psychotronic weaponry

14.1 U.S. Army Research Lab Confirms Neuroscience Focus
According to the biennial report, the “2013-2014 Assessment of the Army Research
Laboratory:
Interim Report,” the Panel on Human Sciences at the Army Research Laboratory (ARL)
conducted its review of the ARL’s “translational neuroscience” program at Aberdeen,
Maryland.91
Patent available at:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004/mar/HQ_04093_subvocal_speech.html.
“2013-2014 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory: Interim Report,” Army
Research
Laboratory Technical Assessment Board; Laboratory Assessments Board; Division on
Engineering and
90
91

Page
52
The Army Research Laboratory, which the report said had a budget of $10,750,000 in
2013,
recognizes that “translational neuroscience..represents only a portion of ARL’s
human sciences
core technology competency portfolio” 92 – meaning that much more research is
carried out, but
is not reported.
The Army Research Lab continued:
“The goal of the translational neuroscience (TN) program is to integrate modern
neuroscience with
human factors, psychology, and engineering to enhance the understanding of soldier
function and
behavior in complex operational settings. TN, as it is defined, is a unique and
important effort
whose objectives, if successfully accomplished, could be a game changer for soldier
and mission
effectiveness…93
“TN has concentrated its efforts on three research thrusts:
1. Brain–computer interaction (BCI) technologies. Enable mutually adaptive brain–
computer interaction technologies for improving soldier-system performance.
2. Real-world neuroimaging. Assess those aspects of brain function that can be
usefully
monitored outside of the laboratory setting and assess and/or develop the
technologies that are best adapted for this purpose.
3. Brain structure–function couplings. Translate knowledge of differences in
individuals’
brain structure and function to understand and predict differences in task
performance.”94
Also, the ARL said: “In 2012, HRED completed the renovation of its Aberdeen
headquarters. This
renovation included the construction of the new MIND laboratory for the
neuroscience group…” 95

14.2 Russia Seeking Neuroweapons

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin wrote in a February 2012 article that, among
other things:
“weapons systems based on new principles (beam, geophysical, wave, genetic,
psychophysical
and other technology) will be developed. All this will, in addition to nuclear
weapons, provide
entirely new instruments for achieving political and strategic goals. Such hi-tech
weapons systems
will be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons but will be more “acceptable” in
terms of political
and military ideology…Our number one priorities are nuclear forces, aerospace
defense, military
Physical Sciences; National Research Council chap. 4, pp. 47 - 52 available at:
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18661&utm_medium=etmail&utm_source=The
%20National%20Academies
%20Press&utm_campaign=NAP+mail+new+2014.01.28&utm_content=&utm_term=.
92
Ibid.
93
Ibid.
94
Ibid.
95
Ibid.
Page
53
communications, intelligence and control, electronic warfare, drones, unmanned
missile systems,
modern transport aviation, individual combat protection gear, precision weapons and
defense
capabilities against such weapons.“96

In March 2012, the then Russian Defense Minister Anatoli Serdjukov said: “The
development of
weaponry based on new physics principles; direct-energy weapons, geophysical
weapons,
wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons, psychotronic weapons, etc., is part of the
state arms
procurement program for 2011-2020.” Serdyukov made this statement at a meeting with
Prime
Minister Vladimir Putin.97
14.3 A Microwave Assault on the Honduran President
In 2009, the Guardian and other newspapers reported on the alleged microwave
targeting of
ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya during a siege by the Honduran military of
the
Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa.98
Zelaya claimed was he subjected to "electron bombardment with microwaves" producing
"headache and organic destabilization.”99
A complaint was filed by Zelaya with the Permanent Council of the Organization of
American
States (OAS), and an OAS statement denounced and condemned:
“the hostile action by the de facto regime against the embassy of Brazil in
Tegucigalpa and the
harassment of its occupants through deliberate actions that affect them physically
and
psychologically and violate their human rights. The Permanent Council calls on the
de facto regime
to put an immediate end to these actions, to respect the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic
Relations and international instruments on human rights, and to withdraw forthwith
all repressive
forces from the areas surrounding the Embassy of Brazil, without neglecting the due
security of the
Mission. The Permanent Council appeals for guarantees for the right to life,
integrity, and security
of President José Manuel Zelaya Rosales and of all persons in and around the
Embassy of Brazil,
as well as for the protection of their dignity, and it urges the Inter-American
Commission on Human
Rights to follow up on this situation.”100

In addition, in an October 5, 2009 interview with the U.S. television program

“Democracy Now!,”
Zelaya said that, as Honduran President, he “of course” had knowledge of microwave
weaponry
Putin made this statement in Rossiiskaya Gazeta in the 20 February 2012 titled
“Being strong:
National security guarantees for Russia,” authored by Putin, available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120312153358/http://premier.gov.ru/eng/events/news/18
185/.
97
Available at: http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20120322/172332421.html.
98
Fabiano Maisonnave, “Manuel Zelaya Undergoes Strange Siege inside Brazilian
Embassy,” Guardian
online, 25 October 2009. Available at:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/25/hondurasmanuel-zelaya-embassy-siege.
99
Ibid.
100
Organization of American States (OAS) “CONDEMNATION OF THE ACTS OF INTIMIDATION
AGAINST
THE EMBASSY OF BRAZIL IN HONDURAS,” (Approved by the OAS Permanent Council at its
meeting of
October 21, 2009), available at: http://www.oas.org/consejo/resolutions/dec43.asp.
96

Page
54
in the Honduran arsenal. An excerpt of the transcript of said interview, conducted
by Amy
Goodman, follows:101
PRESIDENT MANUEL ZELAYA:
We have been repressed and limited to the embassy. Tear gas has been fired. Our
electronic lines,
our telephone lines have been cut. We’ve also been under attack from microwaves and
the sound
cannon, a long-range acoustic device.
AMY GOODMAN:
What do you mean, acoustic device, a sound cannon?
PRESIDENT MANUEL ZELAYA:
[translated] There are two kinds of unconventional weapons that have been used
against us by the
regime. There’s a high-frequency pitch that has been used against protesters. And
another weapon
that has been used against us is an electronic device that issues microwaves, which
is very
harmful for your health. It causes headaches.
AMY GOODMAN:
As president, do you know about this in the Honduran arsenal?
PRESIDENT MANUEL ZELAYA:
[translated] Yes, of course. We all suffered this. We all witnessed it. There’s
photographs and
videos of this occurring.
AMY GOODMAN:
And who is using this outside — the tear gas, the sound cannon, whatever you call
it, the highfrequency machine? Is it Honduran soldiers?
PRESIDENT MANUEL ZELAYA:
[translated] There are military forces that have surrounded the embassy. The
embassy, in fact, has
been turned into a concentration camp.”102

14.4 Additional Electromagnetic Targeting Cases

Another case of political persecution using electronic weaponry was claimed in
2011, when the
running mate of Taiwan opposition presidential candidate, James Soong, stated that
he had
come under attack from “electromagnetic waves” perpetrated by a local intelligence
unit.103
Video and transcript of the Democracy Now! interview of Manuel Zelaya by Amy
Goodman available
at:
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/10/5/ousted_honduran_president_manuel_zelaya_speak
s.
102
Ibid.
103
Jens Kastner, “Taiwanese Election Looms,” Asia Sentinel, 15 December 2011.
Available at:
http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?
option=com_content&task=view&id=4048&Itemid=386.
101

Page
55
An additional example of alleged use of electromagnetic radiation neuroweapons and
torture is
the case of Tek Nath Rizal, a prominent government consultant to the South Asian
country of
Bhutan, before he exposed corruption among senior officials. He then became a
popular
political figure and renowned human rights activist. Tek Nath Rizal spent several
years of
imprisonment in Bhutan and alleged that he was a victim of government mind control
torture
with secret electromagnetic radiation (EMR) mind control weapons. The U.S.
Department of
State and Amnesty International classified Rizal as a political prisoner and he won
his release
from prison and authored a book about his experiences.104
14.5 A Failed Bid to Ban Space-based Mind Weapons
In other public action regarding psychotronic weaponry, on October 2, 2001, U.S.
Congressman
Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH) introduced a bill in the United States House of
Representatives, the
Space Preservation Act of 2001, which would obligate the American president to
engage in
negotiations aimed at the ban of space-based weapons.
In this bill, the definition of a weapons system included:
“any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting death or injury
on, or damaging
or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or
physical and
economic well-being of a person)… through the use of land-based, sea- based, or
space-based
systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other
energies directed at
individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management,
or mind control of such persons or populations.”105

The bill received an “Unfavorable Executive Comment” from the U.S. Department of
Defense, 106
via the House Armed Services Committee, and the preceding language was removed from
the
final bill.107
Victim speculates that said “Unfavorable Executive Comment” from the Department of
Defense
could be due to the military applications of such weaponry, including the use of
extremely
sensitive space-based radio telescope satellite arrays of which allow for detecting
miniscule
electromagnetic signals from human begins and other life forms.
Tek Nath Rizal, Torture: Killing me softly, (Bhutan, Friends of Bhutan, 2010).
Available at
http://www.freedomfchs.com/teknathrizal.pdf.
105
Kucinich’s original proposed language of H.R. 2977 - Space Preservation Act of
2001, 107th
Congress (2001-2002), available at: http://beta.congrsess.gov/bill/107th/house-
bill/2977/text?
q={%22search%22:[%22space%20preservation%20act%22]}.
106
History of action on H.R. 2977 - Space Preservation Act of 2001, 107th Congress
(2001-2002),
available at: http://beta.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/2977/all-
actions/?q=%7B
%22search%22%3A%5B%22space+preservation+act%22%5D%7D.
107
Article noting removal of Kucinich’s language from the Space Preservation Act of
2001, Mojmir
Babacek, “The Threat of Information, Electromagnetic and Psychotronic Warfare,”
Global Research, 29
September 2005. Available at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-threat-of-
information-electromagneticand-psychtronic-warfare.
104

Page
56
Although his proposed language in the Space Preservation Act of 2001 was removed,
the actual
deployment of those means was ultimately confirmed by Congressman Kucinich, who was
subsequently quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and that “those
people who
control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don’t stop the
weaponization of
space.”108
14.6 EU Parliament Resolution Calling for a Global Ban on Neuroweapons
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it called “for
an
international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and
deployments of
weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings.“109
A subsequent 1999 European Parliament report by STOA (Scientific and Technological
Options
Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European
Parliament,
on Crowd Control Technologies discusses standards for the use of “non-lethal
weaponry” in
Europe.110 The report added that the aforementioned EU Parliament resolution calls
for an:
“international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether
military or
civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound
vibration or other
functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the
manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment
of such
systems.111

Remarking on psychotronic weaponry, including the capability of the U.S. Military,

the STOA
report says:
“NEW BIO-WEAPONS FOR CROWD CONTROL
Evidence emerged during the course of this study indicating that advances in
neuroscience
modelling of receptor sites in the human brain, coupled with new knowledge of the
human genetic
code (emerging from both the Human Genome Project and the Human Diversity Project),
is already
opening a path for malign use of the biological sciences for targeted human
control. Whilst the
research is still embryonic, there is a risk of behavior modification, race
specific crowd control
Archive of article in the Berkeley Daily Planet from 3 June 2005 quoting
Representative Kucinich
available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060507191449/http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/articl
e.cfm?issue=0603-05&storyID=21550.
109
European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from
January 28,
1999, point 27, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?
PRG=CALDOC&FILE=990128&LANGUE=EN&TPV=DEF&LASTCHAP=1&SDOCTA=8&TXTLST=1&Type_Do
c=RESOL&POS=1.
110
Ibid. 17.
111
Available in the 1999 STOA Report (Scientific and Technological Options
Assessment), part of the
Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament, published on Crowd
Control
Technologies, viii, available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20030310184611/http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pd
f/99-14-01a_en.pdf.
108

Page
57
weapons and area denial technologies emerging with profound implications which need
to be
further assessed in terms of both current capabilities and what the results of
these projects might
mean in terms of the state of the art, which is rapidly changing. Given that the EC
has already
agreed to ban any weapons which directly work on the basis of targeting or
otherwise interfering
with the operation of the human brain, a new STOA study is proposed, covering the
potential
malign implications of human genetic modification research and related genome
projects on human
control weapons of the future.”112

In specific reference to U.S. non-lethal weaponry projects, the STOA report adds:
“Whilst the full range of many of these highly secretive programs may never be
known, some of the
projects have been reported as being associated with particular research
laboratories. Eg. Laser
research (ARPA, ARDEC, Los Alamos, Army Communication Electronic Command); Optical
munitions (ARDEC/Los Alamos and Phillips Laboratories); Acoustics (SARA, ARDEC, Los
Alamos);
Electromagnetic pulse (ARDEC, Los Alamos, Harry Diamond Laboratory, Eglin Air Force
Base)
…”113

Significantly, the STOA report adds,

“The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology
proposed by the U.S.
are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly
manipulate human
behavior in a variety of unusual ways. Some microwave systems have been proposed
which can
raise body temperature to between 105 to 107 degrees F, to provide a disabling
effect in a manner
based on the microwave cooker principle. However, the greatest concern is with
systems which
can directly interact with the human nervous system. There are many reports on so
called
psychotronic weapons which are beyond the brief of this study but one comment can
be made. The
research undertaken to date both in the U.S. and in Russia can be divided into two
related areas:
(i) individual mind control and (ii) crowd control. That the U.S. has undertaken a
variety of mind
control programs in the past such as MkUltra and MkDELTA114 is a matter of public
record and
those using electromagnetic radiation such as PANDORA have been the focus of
researchers in
para-politics for many years. More recently, authors such as Begich and Roderick
have alleged
significant breakthroughs in the ability of military high frequency electromagnetic
technologies to
manipulate human behavior.” 115
Available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20030310184611/http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pd
f/99-14-01a_en.pdf.
113
Available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20030310184611/http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pd
f/99-14-01a_en.pdf, 45.
114
MkULTRA, a project of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is discussed in
greater detail in
section 13 of this Petition.
115
Dr. Nick Begich is the eldest son of the late United States Congressman from
Alaska, Nick Begich Sr.
He co-authored with Jeane Manning the book “Angels Don't Play This HAARP; Advances
in Tesla
Technology,” and has theorized that that the High Altitude Auroral Research Project
(HAARP), an Alaska
radio antenna array which has been classified as a military weapon by the European
Union Parliament,
is used, among other things, to broadcast mind control frequencies. Biography of
Begich is available
112

Page
58
The STOA report, speaking on U.S. activity on psychotronic weapons, continues:
“What is admitted by the military authorities in the U.S. is that research programs
using so called
directed energy weapons for anti-personnel and anti-material purposes are
proceeding into
prototype stages. The military utility of these weapons is that they provide a
tunable or rheostat
ability, a need that is emerging as part of the new U.S. military intervention
doctrine of so called
layered defense. This means in practice an onion style of risk where anyone coming
into contact
with the outer shell may be sickened, paralyzed. Entering subsequent levels may
lead to being
physically harmed, disabled or permanently maimed whilst the core of the zone is
protected by
lethal technology, contact with which is fatal.” 116

In May 1999, a conference of neuroscientists sponsored by the UN took place in

Tokyo. Its final
declaration formally acknowledged that:
“Today we have intellectual, physical and financial resources to master the power
of the brain itself,
and to develop devices to touch the mind and even control or erase consciousness…We
wish to
profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and welfare.” 117

In 1998, the French National Bioethics Committee warned that “neuroscience is being
increasingly recognized as posing a potential threat to human rights.“118
Further evidence of the existence of “silent sound” communications, and that they
have been
perfected, is shown by a document which appeared on the website of the U.S.
Environmental
Protection Agency in 1997, where its Office of Research and Development presented
the
Department of Defense’s project: “Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory
Effect.”119
The description on the EPA website said:
“An innovative and revolutionary technology is described that offers a low-
probability-of-intercept
radiofrequency (RF) communications. The feasibility of the concept has been
established using
both a low intensity laboratory system and a high power RF transmitter. Numerous
military
applications exist in areas of search and rescue, security and special operations…”
120

at: http://www.earthpulse.com/src/category.asp?catid=13. Resources related to

psychotronic weaponry
on Begich’s Internet site are available at:
http://www.earthpulse.com/src/category.asp?catid=12.
116
European Parliament STOA Report, 1999, Available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20030310184611/http:/www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf
/99-14-01a_en.pdf, liii.
117
Archive of the document from the 1999 UN sponsored conference of neuroscientists in
Tokyo is
available at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20050215192531/http://www.ndsu.ac.jp/~tokyo99/declartat
ion.htm.
118
“Advances in Neurosciences May Threaten Human Rights,” Nature, vol. 391, January
22, 1998, 316.
119
Mojmir Babacek, “Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote Control of the
Human
Nervous System,” Global Research, 21 January, 2013.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/psychotronic-andelectromagnetic-weapons-remote-
control-of-the-human-nervous-system/5319111.
120
Ibid.

Page
59
14.7 MkUltra, the CIA’s Long, Documented History of “Mind Control” Experimentation
Significantly, the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has a long and
welldocumented history of engaging in extensive non-consensual research on
thousands of
innocent victims for purposes of “mind control” experimentation on Americans,
primarily through
two programs, MkUltra and MkDelta,121 which resulted in numerous lawsuits and
settlements
due to the CIA carrying out experiments without the knowledge and consent of the
victims.
According to Wikipedia, the CIA’s MkUltra project was:
“the code name of a U.S. government covert research operation experimenting in the
behavioral
engineering of humans (mind control) through the CIA’s Scientific Intelligence
Division. The
program began in the early 1950s, was officially sanctioned in 1953, was reduced in
scope in 1964,
further curtailed in 1967 and officially halted in 1973. The program engaged in
many illegal
activities, in particular it used unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test
subjects…MkUltra
involved the use of methodologies to manipulate people’s mental states and alter
brain functions,
including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially LSD and other
chemicals, hypnosis,
sensormicrowave or UHF torture and deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse,
as well as
various forms of torture…The revelations about the CIA and the Army prompted a
number of
subjects or their survivors to file lawsuits against the government for conducting
experiments
without informed consent…Several plaintiffs received compensation through court
order, out-ofcourt settlement, or acts of Congress.”122

The Wikipedia information on the CIA’s MkUltra project continues:

“In December 1974, The New York Times alleged that the CIA had conducted illegal
domestic
activities, including experiments on U.S. citizens, during the 1960s. That report
prompted
investigations by the U.S. Congress, in the form of the Church Committee, and by a
presidential
commission known as the Rockefeller Commission that looked into domestic activities
of the CIA,
the FBI, and intelligence-related agencies of the military.123
“In the summer of 1975, congressional Church Committee reports and the presidential
Rockefeller Commission report revealed to the public for the first time that the
CIA and the
Department of Defense had conducted experiments on both unwitting and cognizant
human
subjects as part of an extensive program to influence and control human behavior
through the use
of psychoactive drugs such as LSD and mescaline and other chemical, biological, and
psychological means.124
“The congressional committee investigating the CIA research, chaired by Senator
Frank Church,
concluded that "[p]rior consent was obviously not obtained from any of the
subjects." The
Description of the CIA’s MKUltra program is available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra.
122
Ibid.
123
Ibid.
124
Ibid.
121

Page
60
committee noted that the "experiments sponsored by these researchers ... call into
question the
decision by the agencies not to fix guidelines for experiments… 125
“Following the recommendations of the Church Committee, President Gerald Ford in
1976 issued
the first Executive Order on Intelligence Activities which, among other things,
prohibited
"experimentation with drugs on human subjects, except with the informed consent, in
writing and
witnessed by a disinterested party, of each such human subject" and in accordance
with the
guidelines issued by the National Commission. Subsequent orders by Presidents
Carter and
Reagan expanded the directive to apply to any human experimentation.” 126
Also, according to Wikipedia, “On the Senate floor in 1977, Senator Ted Kennedy
said: The Deputy
Director of the CIA revealed that over thirty universities and institutions were
involved in an
"extensive testing and experimentation" program which included covert drug tests on
unwitting
citizens "at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign."
Several of these tests
involved the administration of LSD to "unwitting subjects in social situations." At
least one death,
that of Dr. Olson, resulted from these activities. The Agency itself acknowledged
that these tests
made little scientific sense. The agents doing the monitoring were not qualified
scientific
observers.”127

In a report on MkUltra from the U.S. Congress in 1977, “PROJECT MkUltra, THE CIA’S
PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN BEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION,”128 the following interview is
recorded:
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MkUltra, which involved examination of techniques
to cause
brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to strike individuals
without
giving warning and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone dubbed it
"perfect
concussion"—maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff rather than your
poets over
there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion experiments were
about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was
carried out by the
Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us. The
CIA seems to
have been participating in some way at that point, because the records go on to say
that the
experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it was a cover, and
then the
project was transferred to MkUltra in 1956. Again, this is all from the backup
material you have
given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not disagreeing with that, but
apparently for at
least a year or two, somebody was investigating the production of brain concussions
with special
blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods as detailed in the backup material…
125
126
127
128

Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
See “PROJECT MKULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION,
JOINT

HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH
AND
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF THE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE
NINETY-FIFTH
CONGRESS FIRST SESSION AUGUST 3, 1977,” p. 40. Available at:

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/13inmate_ProjectMKULTRA.pdf.

Page
61
Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to make this an MkUltra
subject. There had
to be some sort of review that led to a decision to continue that kind of
concussion—total blackout,
maximum amnesia, and whatever else it was you were interested in—study and testing.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The
document notes that
"Three blast test series have been run to date…It describes a special blackjack
device, "a
pancake-type black-jack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure." I agree
the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems
that some testing
was done.“

Shortly after MkUltra was ostensibly terminated, the UN Committee on Disarmament

discussed
Electromagnetic Weapons, from 1979 to 1998. A report on that activity, The United
Nations and
Disarmament: 1945-1985 by the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (1985) New
York, UN
Publication Sales No. E.85.IX.6, describes electromagnetic weapons issues from 1975
through
1985, which continue today.129
This UN Report alludes to:
“New types of weapons of mass destruction and new systems of such weapons;
radiological
weapons…”
The report adds, “The question of new weapons of mass destruction has been under
continuous
consideration in the General Assembly and in the Conference on Disarmament for a
number of
years. The item "Prohibition of the development and manufacture of new types of
weapons of mass
destruction and new systems of such weapons" was first included in the agenda of
the General
Assembly in 1975 at the initiative of the Soviet Union, which submitted a draft
international
agreement. The topic is at present on the agenda of the Conference on Disarmament.
The Final Document of the 1978 special session of the General Assembly stated in
paragraph 77
that in order to help prevent a qualitative arms race and so that scientific and
technological
achievements might ultimately be used solely for peaceful purposes, effective
measures should be
taken to avoid the danger and prevent the emergence of new types of weapons of mass
destruction based on new scientific principles and achievements. The same year, the
General
Assembly, at its regular session, adopted two separate resolutions on the issue,
one sponsored by
the Western States and the other by the Eastern European States, reflecting the
respective
approaches.
“Subsequently, the Soviet Union clarified its position by calling for a
comprehensive agreement on
the prohibition of new weapons of mass destruction that would be accompanied by a
list of specific
types to be banned, with the possibility of adding to the list in the future and
the possibility of
concluding separate agreements on specific new types of weapons as they emerged. To
that
The United Nations and Disarmament: 1945-1985 by the UN Department for Disarmament
Affairs.
(1985) New York, UN Publication Sales No. E.85.IX.6. This report describes
electromagnetic weapons
issues from 1975 through 1985. This East West political disagreement, as described
in an excerpt from
pages 114-116, continues today. Excerpt available at: http://mindjustice.org/9.htm.
129

Page
62
end, in 1979, the Soviet Union submitted a document to the Committee on Disarmament
in which it
listed some types of potential weapons of mass destruction, such as:
“Radiological weapons (using radioactive materials) which could produce harmful
radiation effects
similar to effect of a nuclear explosion; Particle-beam weapons based on the use of
charged or
neutral particles to affect biological targets. Sufficiently powerful bundles of
particles could be
produced in accelerators used for research; in some operating accelerators, the
energy of
accelerated particles attained hundreds of millions of electron volts. Reduction of
the size and
weight of accelerator systems and power sources could permit their use as weapons;
Infrasonic
"acoustic radiation" weapons.
“They would utilize harmful effects of infrasonic oscillations on biocurrents of
the brain and nervous
system;
”Electromagnetic weapons operating at certain radio-frequency radiations, which
could have
injurious effects on human organs. Within a few years, devices capable of
directional transmission
of electromagnetic radiation of enormous power over distances of several hundred
kilometers
might be developed, and radiation density in excess of safety standards could be
produced over
areas measuring dozens of square kilometers.
“In response, the United States and other Western countries, while expressing
readiness to work
out agreements on specific types of weapons which might be identified, took the
position that a
single treaty on the subject of all potential new weapons of mass destruction would
have to be so
general in its scope and so vague in its definitions that it would not be
effective.”

15. Excerpts from selected Academic Articles on Psychotronic Weaponry

In an article entitled “Monitoring and Manipulating Brain Function: New
Neuroscience
Technologies and Their Ethical Implications,”130 the authors state:
Many of the new social and ethical issues in neuroscience result from one of two
developments.
The first is the ability to monitor brain function in living humans with a spatial
and temporal
resolution sufficient to capture psychologically meaningful fluctuations of
activity. The second is the
ability to alter the brain with chemical or anatomical selectivity that is
sufficient to induce specific
functional changes.

As further evidence of the intentions of the U.S. military and intelligence

community regarding
psychotronic weaponry, in June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the U.S.
Navy’s nonlethal electromagnetic weapons project, published a scientific article
where he states:
“Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by
which all
sensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct
stimulation of these
Martha J. Farah and Paul Root Wolpe, “Monitoring and Manipulating Brain Function
New
Neuroscience Technologies and Their Ethical Implications,” May-June 2004, p. 35,
available at:
http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~mfarah/Neuroethics-BrainFunction.pdf.
130

Page
63
codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic
patterns may
require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity and
contemporary
communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain
temperature
could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a subharmonic whose frequency
range at
about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz.”131

Persinger added:
“The technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the
approximately six billion
brains of the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities
by generating
neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species
are
immersed… is now marginally feasible.“132 Victim notes that nearly 14 years have
passed since
these chilling observations were made, during which there have been innumerable
advances in
neuroscience.

In other academic evidence of the U.S. Military’s focus on electromagnetic fields

and their
interaction with human beings, Volume II of the Final Report on Biotechnology
Research
Requirements for Aeronautical Systems of the American Air Force, from 1982, states:
“While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through
thermal
loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the
possibilities of
directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields…”
133

In another example of early speculation into the possibility of weaponizing

neuroscientific
principals, in a seminal 1998 article on the potential of neuroweapons, “The Mind
Has No
Firewall,” in Parameters, a publication of the U.S. Army’s Strategic Studies
Institute, Timothy L.
Thomas writes of the need for, and possible use of, psychotronic weaponry in the
U.S.
arsenal.134
Thomas writes in Parameters:
“The human body, much like a computer, contains myriad data processors. They
include, but are
not limited to, the chemical-electrical activity of the brain, heart, and
peripheral nervous system, the
signals sent from the cortex region of the brain to other parts of our body, the
tiny hair cells in the
inner ear that process auditory signals, and the light-sensitive retina and cornea
of the eye that
process visual activity. We are on the threshold of an era in which these data
processors of the
M. A. Persinger, “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by
Electromagnetic
Induction of Fundamental Algorithms,” Perception and Motor Skills, June 1995.
Available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396.
132
Ibid.
133
Volume II of the Final Report Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical
Systems of the
American Air Force, 1982, available at: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?
AD=ADA118458.
134
From Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92. Available at:
http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/98spring/thomas.
htm.
131

Page
64
human body may be manipulated or debilitated. Examples of unplanned attacks on the
body's
data-processing capability are well-documented. Strobe lights have been known to
cause epileptic
seizures. Not long ago in Japan, children watching television cartoons were
subjected to pulsating
lights that caused seizures in some and made others very sick.”
Thomas added, “Defending friendly and targeting adversary data-processing
capabilities of the
body appears to be an area of weakness in the U.S. approach to information warfare
theory, a
theory oriented heavily toward systems data-processing and designed to attain
information
dominance on the battlefield. Or so it would appear from information in the open,
unclassified
press. This U.S. shortcoming may be a serious one, since the capabilities to alter
the dataprocessing systems of the body already exist. A recent edition of U.S. News
and World Report
highlighted several of these "wonder weapons" (acoustics, microwaves, lasers) and
noted that
scientists are "searching the electromagnetic and sonic spectrums for wavelengths
that can affect
human behavior."135 A recent Russian military article offered a slightly different
slant to the problem,
declaring that "humanity stands on the brink of a psychotronic war" with the mind
and body as
the focus. That article discussed Russian and international attempts to control the
psycho-physical
condition of man and his decision-making processes by the use of VHF-generators,
"noiseless
cassettes," and other technologies.”
Thomas continues, “An entirely new arsenal of weapons, based on devices designed to
introduce
subliminal messages or to alter the body's psychological and data-processing
capabilities, might be
used to incapacitate individuals. These weapons aim to control or alter the psyche,
or to attack the
various sensory and data-processing systems of the human organism. In both cases,
the goal is to
confuse or destroy the signals that normally keep the body in equilibrium.”

15.1 Humans Can Hear Microwave Energy

In other evidence, 1975, neuropsychologist Don R. Justesen, then director of
Laboratories of
Experimental Neuropsychology at Veterans Administration Hospital in Kansas City,
published an
article in “American Psychologist” titled “Microwaves and Behavior” on the
influence of
microwaves on living beings.
In the article, Justesen quoted the results of an experiment described to him by
his colleague,
Joseph C. Sharp, who was working on Pandora, a secret project of the American Navy.
Justesen wrote about the so-called “Frey effect,” also known as the Radio Frequency
Hearing
Effect or the Microwave Auditory Effect, that “Human beings can “hear” microwave
energy…”136
Justesen’s article states:
Douglas Pasternak, “Wonder Weapons, The Pentagon's quest for nonlethal arms is
amazing. But is it
smart?,” U.S. News and World Report; 6 June 1997, available at:
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/970707/archive_007360.htm.
136
Don Justesen, “Militarization of Neuroscience,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
10 April 2007.
Available at:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3V8FIUj7brsMzJhOTY4ZWItMGI5OC00MzkzLWJjMDQtMDM0OGE
1ZDFhO
GFm/edit?authkey=CKnE554O&hl=en&pli=1.
135

Page
65
“Given a thermodynamic interpretation, it follows that information can be encoded
in the energy
and “communicated” to the listener. Communication has in fact been demonstrated…By
directing
the radiations at his own head, complex messages via the Continental Morse Code
were readily
received by Guy. Sharp and Grove (note 2) found that appropriate modulation of
microwave energy
can result in direct “wireless” and “receiverless” communication of speech. By
radiating themselves
with these ‘voice modulated’ microwaves, Sharp and Grove were readily able to hear,
identify, and
distinguish among the 9 words. The sounds heard were not unlike those emitted by
persons with
artificial larynxes.”137

In the above article, “Militarization of Neuroscience,” the author states that:

“The science in question now is not physics, but neuroscience, and the question is
whether we can
control its militarization.”138

In 2003, an article on Professor James Lin, a leading researcher into microwave

energy and
bioelectromagnetism, said, “His work on the microwave hearing phenomenon has been
crucial
to understanding the auditory perception of pulse modulated microwaves. In
particular, Lin’s
elegant analytical and experimental studies of the theory of microwave-induced
thermoelastic
tissue interaction have made the microwave hearing phenomenon one of the most well
defined
and best understood effects of pulse-modulated microwave radiation.”139
In the 2007 article in the Washington Post, “Mind Games,” the author states:
“An academic paper written for the Air Force in the mid-1990s mentions the idea of
a weapon that
would use sound waves to send words into a person's head. "The signal can be a
'message from
God' that can warn the enemy of impending doom, or encourage the enemy to
surrender.
“In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology:
using
microwaves to send words into someone's head. The patent was based on human
experimentation
in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit
phrases into the heads
of human subjects."140

15.2 60 Minutes “Mind Reading” Segment

In addition, the television show 60 Minutes in 2009 featured a segment, titled
“Mind Reading,”
which explicitly and prophetically shows the stunning advances of neuroimaging
technology and
the ability to identify what experimental subjects are thinking of.141 Victim notes
that nearly 5
Ibid
Ibid.
139
Bioelectromagnetics Newsletter of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Number 172,
May/June 2003, p.
1, available at: http://www.bioelectromagnetics.org/newsletter/news172.pdf.
140
Sharon Weinberger, “Mind Games,” Washington Post, January 14, 2007. Available at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399.html.
141
60 Minutes video on “Mind Reading” detailing stunning advances in neuroscience and
remote
neuroimaging which allows for remote reading of thoughts, dating as far back as
2008, reported by
137
138

Page
66
years have passed since this segment on non-classified neuroimaging technology was
broadcast; there have been numerous advances since then, and the U.S. military /
intelligence
structure has vastly more advanced technology than the private sector, being
considered 20 –
30 years ahead of commercially available technology.
And most recently, the United Nations Information Center, the European Parliament
and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency referenced a January 22, 2013 article in the
News
Beacon Ireland by a leading expert on psychotronic weaponry, the use of which is
not currently
banned, though banning has been under discussion in the U.N., with China and Russia
largely
blocking such a ban, according to the News Beacon Ireland.142
That article, “Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote Control of the
Human
Nervous System,” makes assertions such as:
“Britain’s Daily Mail…wrote that research in electromagnetic weapons has been
secretly carried out
in the U.S.A and Russia since the 1950’s and that previous research has shown that
low-frequency
waves or beams can affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it
possible to transmit
suggestions and commands directly into someone’s thought processes. High doses of
microwaves
can damage the functioning of internal organs, control behavior or drive victims to
suicide.”143

As further evidence of the existence of psychotronic mind control technology,

famous Japanese
scientist Michio Kaku, New York Times best-selling author of Physics of the
Impossible, Physics
of the Future and Hyperspace, tackles what he calls the most fascinating and
complex object in
the known universe: the human brain, in a book to be published in February 2014,
“The Future
of the Mind.”
According to promotional material for the “Future of the Mind:”
“For the first time in history, the secrets of the living brain are being revealed
by a battery of high
tech brain scans devised by physicists. Now what was once solely the province of
science fiction
has become a startling reality. Recording memories, telepathy, videotaping our
dreams, mind
control, avatars, and telekinesis are not only possible; they already exist.” 144

In addition, Dr. Barrie Trower, a former U.K.-based intelligence agent and expert
on secret
U.S. and U.K. experiments using microwave technology, asserted in a 2012 video
interview
that so-called “Voice to Skull” technology has been extensively experimented with
and
perfected.

Lesley Stahl, is available at: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5119805n.

142
Article on mind control research available at:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2013/02/506305.html.
143
Mojmir Babacek, “Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote Control of the
Human
Nervous System, 22 January 2013, available at: http://news-beacon-ireland.info/?
p=10231. This is an
excellent primer on the current status of psychotronic weaponry.
144
Promotional material for Kaku’s upcoming book, The Future of the Find, to be
published in February
2014, is available at: http://knopfdoubleday.com/book/89414/the-future-of-the-
mind/.

Page
67
Trower said:
“Voices are the easiest…because all you have to do is stimulate the cochlea
(hearing cells in
the inner ear) with a set resonance frequency. Voices are very easy. And it isn’t
people
imagining voices, they physically hear them…You can physically make people hear
voices...and it can be any conversation. It can be anybody you want to hear, a soft
angelic
voice, a god, it can be something that scares you like a devil, it can be
anything.” 145

Victim notes that it is generally considered that the psychotronic weapons

capabilities of the
U.S. government, the NSA and other “black” U.S. agencies such as the CIA, the
National
Reconnaissance Office, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and
corporations
comprising the U.S. national military/intelligence industrial complex, which have
unlimited
funding for research and development of secret proprietary technology, are
considered to be at
least 20-30 years ahead of academia and non-classified sectors of private industry
when it
comes to non-lethal psychotronic weapons research – though the non-classified
private sector
is catching up.

16. Psychotronics Weaponry Potential of the U.S. BRAIN Initiative

On April 2, 2013, the White House announced a highly ambitious new neuroscience
research
program, the “Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN)
Initiative” to focus studies on the human brain.146 It is notable that this is the
second such major
initiative on brain research by the U.S. in recent decades. President George H.W.
Bush
designated 1990-1999 as the “Decade of the Brain,” and there was also a research
focus on
neuroscience during that period.147
Regarding the current BRAIN Initiative, the White House said that possible outcomes
are to:
“Reduce language barriers through technological advances in how computers interface
with
human thought.”
Other stated goals of the Initiative are to:


“Understand how brain activity leads to perception, decision making and ultimately
action;”


“Develop new imaging technologies and understand how information is stored and
processed in neural networks;” and

“Produce a sophisticated understanding of the brain, from individual genes to

neuron circuits
to behavior.”148
Available at: http://truththeory.com/2012/08/14/dr-barrie-trower-exposes-
governments-secretexperiments-and-microwave-weapons-interview/.
146
White House statement on the BRAIN Initiative from 2 April 2013 is available at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/share/brain-initiative.
147
Wikipedia entry on Decade of the Brain in the 1990s, available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade_of_the_Brain.
148
Ibid.
145

Page
68
16.1 BRAIN Initiative Focus on Neuroimaging
Also, the White House said:
“The BRAIN Initiative will accelerate the development and application of new
technologies that will
enable researchers to produce dynamic pictures of the brain that show how
individual brain
cells and complex neural circuits interact at the speed of thought. These
technologies will open
new doors to explore how the brain records, processes, uses, stores, and retrieves
vast
quantities of information, and shed light on the complex links between brain
function and
behavior.”149

The White House added:

“In the last decade alone, scientists have made a number of landmark discoveries
that now create
the opportunity to unlock the mysteries of the brain, including the sequencing of
the human
genome, the development of new tools for mapping neuronal connections, the
increasing resolution
of imaging technologies, and the explosion of nanoscience. These breakthroughs have
paved the
way for unprecedented collaboration and discovery across scientific fields. For
instance, by
combining advanced genetic and optical techniques, scientists can now use pulses of
light to
determine how specific cell activities in the brain affect behavior. In addition,
through the integration
of neuroscience and physics, researchers can now use high-resolution imaging
technologies to
observe how the brain is structurally and functionally connected in living
humans.”150

In addition, Obama, announcing the initiative, said it could impact “the lives of
not just millions,
but billions of people on this planet,” and he asked rhetorically, “what if
computers could
respond to our thoughts or our language barriers could come tumbling down?…That's
the future
we're imagining. That's what we're hoping for.”151
However, Victim asserts that many of the capabilities of the so-called “BRAIN
Initiative” already
exist, and that it is widely believed by experts that many more sinister and
advanced “mind
control” capabilities are in the classified U.S. arsenal, but that these
capabilities have been kept
secret by the U.S. government and have been used to torture Victim due to his
knowledge of
organized crime ties of the Obama administration.152
16.2 Asia Human Rights Commission Warns of Neuroweaponry Abuse
Victim also notes that the scope of the “BRAIN Initiative” has raised alarm among
some human
rights organizations.
Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/02/fact-sheet-
brain-initiative.
Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/02/fact-sheet-
brain-initiative.
151
Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/02/remarks-
president-braininitiative-and-american-innovation.
152
See Cheryl Welsh, Essex Human Rights Review Vol. 9 No. 1, June 2012, available at:
http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V9N1/WELSH.pdf.
149
150

Page
69
For example, the initiative has been criticized due to its potential for further
weaponization of
neuroscience as a result of intensified research, which could lead to widespread
abuses of such
technology, not only for offensive military uses, but also for use against a
nation’s own citizenry,
for example, to control political dissidents.
As an example, an Interim Report on the BRAIN Initiative was released by the
National
Institutes of Health (NIH) in September 2013. This report highlighted that:
“directly activating and inhibiting populations of neurons, neuroscience is
progressing from
observation to causation, and much more is possible. To enable the immense
potential of circuit
manipulation, a new generation of tools for optogenetics, pharmacogenetics, and
biochemical and
electromagnetic modulation should be developed for use in animals and eventually in
human
patients. Emphasis should be placed on achieving modulation of circuits in patterns
that mimic
natural activity."153

But such unbridled research is not without its critics. The Asian Human Rights
Commission, for
example, which publishes Torture Magazine, said in a statement in response to the
NIH Interim
Report that:
“The threat is real. The NIH Interim Report is another of many indications that
brain technology for
neuroweapons is scientifically possible. Additionally, some say such technologies
have been used
systematically against select people in various jurisdictions. Many definitions on
certain procedures
and practices have to be revisited due to the many legal loopholes that allow for
real criminals to
commit illegal activities…Currently, the dialectic on the new neuroscience programs
is extremely
one sided and lacking in an awareness of the likelihood of neuroweapons; there is a
great need for
a more balanced dialogue on a global level in the future as well.” 154

16.3 DARPA Focus on Electromagnetic Brain Signals

As part of the BRAIN Initiative, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA)
said in 2013 that it would be “investing roughly $50 million in 2014 for the goal
of understanding
the dynamic functions of the brain and demonstrating breakthrough applications
based on these
insights.”155
Referring to the presidential BRAIN initiative announced in 2013,156 the DARPA
statement
added:
“The President’s initiative reinforces the significance of understanding how the
brain records,
processes, uses, stores and retrieves vast quantities of information,” explained
DARPA’s Director,
Available at: http://www.nih.gov/science/brain/09162013-Interim%20Report_Final
%20Composite.pdf.
Available at: http://www.humanrights.asia/news/ahrc-news/AHRC-STM-174-2013.
155
Statement from U.S. DARPA on the Obama administration’s 2013 “Brain Research
through
Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies” initiative is available at:
http://science.dodlive.mil/2013/04/19/understanding-the-brain-supporting-national-
security/.
156
Ibid.
153
154

Page
70
Arati Prabhakar.“ This kind of knowledge of brain function could inspire the design
of a new
generation of information processing systems….”157

DARPA said in the statement that it plans to explore two key areas to elicit
further understanding
of the brain.
“New tools are needed to measure and analyze electrical signals and the
biomolecular dynamics
underpinning brain function. Researchers will also explore, abstract and model the
vast spectrum
of brain functions by examining its incredible complexity.158
“DARPA’s planned investment includes new programs to address the areas outlined and
ongoing
efforts designed to:





advance fundamental understanding of the brain’s dynamics to drive applications

(Revolutionizing Prosthetics, Restorative Encoding Memory Integration Neural
Device, Reorganization and Plasticity to Accelerate Injury Recovery, Enabling
Stress
Resistance),

manufacture sensing systems for neuroscience applications (Reliable Neural

Interface
Technology, Blast Gauge), and
analyze large data sets (Detection and Computational Analysis of Psychological
Signals).”159

In addition, DARPA said that it is focusing on Quantum-Assisted Sensing and Readout

(QuASAR) through an ambitious program which:
“will push toward fundamental operating limits by developing atom and atom-like
sensors that
operate near the standard quantum limit (SQL), constructing hybrid quantum sensors
that combine
the optimal sensing and readout capabilities of disparate quantum systems and
entangling multiple
sensors/devices to operate below the SQL. These types of devices will find broad
application
across the DoD, particularly in the areas of biological imaging, inertial
navigation and robust global
positioning systems.”160

Available at: http://science.dodlive.mil/2013/04/19/understanding-the-brain-

supporting-nationalsecurity/.
158
Ibid.
159
Ibid.
160
Available at:
http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/QuantumAssisted_Sensing_and_Readout_(QuA
SAR).aspx.
157

Page
71
17. Evidence of U.S. Military Development of Psychotronic or Microwave
Weapons
17.1 Definitive Proof of Neuroweaponry - an Army Screenshot
As further and quite compelling evidence of the use of psychotronic weaponry by the
U.S.
Military, a now-offline online glossary published by the United States Army Center
for Lessons
Learned (CALL), provided a description is given of so-called “Voice to Skull
Devices.” These
devices are sometimes also referred to as “Voice of God” weapons or V2K, and their
purpose
is to project voices or sounds directly into the human brain.
This U.S. Army CALL glossary entry reads as follows:
“Voice to Skull Devices”
Definition/Scope:
Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses
microwave
transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-
modulated microwave
radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of
person or
animals. NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One
application of V2K is use as an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the
vicinity of airports.” 161

A “screen shot” of the U.S. Army glossary entry, provided by the American
Federation of
Scientists (FAS), can be seen below:162

The U.S. Army’s “Voice to Skull” glossary entry was originally published on the
site of the “Center
for Army Lessons Learned” at http://call.army.mil/products/thesaur_e/00016275.htm,
but was
permanently removed in 2008, prompting an article by Wired Magazine on the
disappearance of the
“Voice to Skull” glossary entry, available at
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/05/army-removespa/. However, numerous copies
and “screen shots” of the original “Voice to Skull” entry exist, including
a cache of the page on the Internet site of the Federation of American Scientists,
available at:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html. An additional “screen shot” of the
Army’s original “Voice
to Skull” glossary entry is available at: http://www.slavery.org.uk/V2Kweapons.jpg.
162
Available at: http://www.slavery.org.uk/V2Kweapons.jpg.
161

Page
72
17.2 MEDUSA – An Unclassified Neuroweapon
In other definitive proof of the existence of neuroweaponry, it has been documented
that at least
one unclassified psychotronic weapon, able to remotely project voices into the
human brain
using the microwave hearing effect, has been developed by the U.S. Military – the
MEDUSA
(Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) project.163
The MEDUSA project was originally contracted by the U.S. Military to the Los
Angeles-based
Waveband Corporation, which was later acquired by the Nevada-based Sierra Nevada
Corporation in 2005.164
According to Wikipedia:
“MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) is a directional, non-lethal
weapon designed
for crowd control and exploiting the microwave auditory effect. It uses microwave
pulses to
generate uncomfortably high noise levels in human skulls.
MEDUSA was initially developed by the WaveBand Corporation; the Sierra Nevada
Corporation
bought waveband in 2005.”165
Information on the Active Denial System available in article by David Hambling, New
Scientist, July
2008, available at: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-
controls-crowdswith-noise.html#.Ut60RRDnbIU.
164
May 2005 news release on acquisition of Waveband Corp. by Sierra Nevada Corp.
“ACQUISITION OF
WAVEBAND CORPORATION (WB) BY SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION (SNC). Sierra Nevada
Corporation
announces its recent acquisition of WaveBand Corporation (WB), a California-based
high-tech company
known for innovation in the field of millimeter wave (MMW) technologies, including
beam-steering
antennas and imaging radar systems.” Available at:
http://www.sncorp.com/press_more_info.php?
id=350.
165
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MEDUSA_(weapon).
163

Page
73
A U.S. Navy contract database from 2004, which includes initial research on the
MEDUSA project,
states:166
“SUMMARY INFORMATION
Objective of Phase Effort
The main goal of the Phase I project was to design and build a breadboard prototype
of a
temporary personnel incapacitation system called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using
Silent
Audio). This non-lethal weapon is based on the well-established microwave auditory
effect
(MAE). MAE results in a strong sound sensation in the human head when it is
irradiated with
specifically selected microwave pulses of low energy. Through the combination of
pulse parameters
and pulse power, it is possible to raise the auditory sensation to the “discomfort”
level, deterring
personnel from entering a protected perimeter or, if necessary, temporarily
incapacitating particular
individuals.
Summary of Results from the Phase I Effort
The major results of the Phase I effort were that - An operating frequency was
chosen - Hardware
requirements were established (commercial magnetron, high-voltage pulse former) -
Hardware was
designed and built - Power measurements were taken and the required pulse
parameters
confirmed - Experimental evidence of MAE was observed
Potential Applications and Benefits
Potential applications of the MEDUSA system are as a perimeter protection sensor in
deterrence
systems for industrial and national sites, for use in systems to assist
communication with hearing
impaired persons, use by law enforcement and military personnel for crowd control
and asset
protection. The system will: be portable, require low power, have a controllable
radius of coverage,
be able to switch from crowd to individual coverage, cause a temporarily
incapacitating effect, have
a low probability of fatality or permanent injury, cause no damage to property, and
have a low
probability of affecting friendly personnel.”167

17.3 Active Denial System (ADS)

Another unclassified so-called “non-lethal” U.S. weapons system which uses
microwaves to
cause a “heating effect” on crowds or individuals from a range of 1 kilometer or
more is the
“Active Denial System,” which has been deployed in recent U.S Military operations
in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
According to Wikipedia:168
Reported in Navy SBIR STTR contract search database, available at:
http://www.navysbirprogram.com/NavySearch/Summary/summary.aspx?pk=F5B07D68-1B19-
4235B140-950CE2E19D08.
167
Ibid.
168
Description of the Active Denial System (ADS) available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System.
166

Page
74
“The Active Denial System (ADS) is a non-lethal, directed-energy weapon developed
by the U.S.
military, designed for area denial, perimeter security and crowd control.
Informally, the weapon is
also called the heat ray since it works by heating the surface of targets, such as
the skin of targeted
human subjects. Raytheon is currently marketing a reduced-range version of this
technology.
“The ADS was deployed in 2010 with the United States military in the Afghanistan
War, but was
withdrawn without seeing combat. On August 20, 2010, the Los Angeles Sheriff's
Department
announced its intent to use this technology on prisoners in the Pitchess Detention
Center in Los
Angeles, stating its intent to use it in "operational evaluation" in situations
such as breaking up
prisoner fights.
“The ADS is currently only a vehicle-mounted weapon, though U.S. Marines and police
are both
working on portable versions. ADS was developed under the sponsorship of the DoD
Non-Lethal
Weapons Program with the Air Force Research Laboratory as the lead agency. There
are reports
that Russia is developing its own version of the Active Denial System.”

18. Selected Media Reports of Actual Psychotronic Weaponry Use

According to psychotronic weapons specialist Mojmir Babacek, psychotronic
technology was
used in Russia during a putsch against Gorbachev.
Babacek writes:
“The use of those weapons is time and again reemerging in times of political
crisis. According to
Russian daily newspapers, during the failed putsch against Mikhail Gorbachov in
1991, general
Kobets warned the defenders of the Russian White House that mind control technology
could be
used against them (Komsomolskaya Pravda, September 7,1991, O. Volkov, Sluchi o tom
chto nam
davili na psychiku nepotverzdalis. Poka“). 169
After the putsch, the vice president of the League of Independent Scientists of the
U.S.S.R, Victor
Sedlecki, published a declaration in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda where
he stated: 170
“As an expert and a legal entity I declare that mass production … of psychotronic
biogenerators
was launched in Kiev (this is indeed a very serious issue). I cannot assert for
sure that that were
exactly Kiev generators that were used during the putsch… However, the fact that
they were used
is obvious to me. What are psychotronic generators? It is an electronic equipment
producing the
effect of guided control in human organism. It especially affects the left and
right hemisphere of the
cortex. This is also the technology of the U.S. Project Zombie 5“. He further
stated that due to the
inexperience of the personnel who operated them the attempt to use the generators
failed.” 171

Mojmir Babacek, “Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote Control of the

Human
Nervous System, Global Research, 21 January, 2013.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/psychotronic-andelectromagnetic-weapons-remote-
control-of-the-human-nervous-system/5319111.
170
Ibid.
171
Ibid.
169

Page
75
18.1 Media Coverage of Psychotronics Use in Iraq
In addition, there has been media coverage about the use of psychotronic weapons in
both U.S.
wars in Iraq.
For example, the ITV News Bureau published an article during the first U.S. Gulf
War entitled: “HiTech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the Middle East,” Bulletin,
23 March 1991, from ITV (London)
News Bureau Ltd.172
A transcript of this ITV News article follows:
“HIGH TECH PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE ARRIVES IN THE MIDDLE EAST
(March 23, 1991)--Sources in Dhahran today revealed what might have been the true
reason for
the seemingly illogical and apparently suicidal attack by Iraqi troops on the
deserted city of AlKhafji, located just 12 miles south of the Kuwaiti border. The
report indicates that the top priority
objective of the Iraqi strike across the border was a successful attempt to destroy
a small, portable
FM radio station that had been installed on the roof of the tallest building in the
town of Al-Khafji by
the U. S. Defense Department's PSY-OPS Branch.
With the destruction of Saddam Hussein's military command and control system,
communications
with Iraqi troops in Kuwait are now largely carried out in a very primitive manner
by utilizing Iraq's
commercial FM radio stations located in the small Iraqi towns adjacent to Kuwait's
western border.
Military orders are encoded and then transmitted by Baghdad's military FM radio
station YIHS.
These signals are received and re-broadcast, in turn, by designated FM stations
located between
Baghdad and the Kuwaiti border until the programming arrives at the designated
"control" station of
the day which then broadcasts directly to the troops in Kuwait on exactly 100.00
MHz (megahertz),
which is continuously monitored by all.
In order to nullify this Iraqi military line of communications (LOC), the U.S. PSY-
OPS organization
attached to the U.S. Central Command in Dhahran installed a portable FM broadcast
transmitter, a
gasoline-electric generator and a continuous tape recording system on top of the
tallest building in
the deserted city of Al-Khafji. The station transmitted on 100.00 MHz and its power
output was
adjusted to cover up the transmission of the Iraqi station operating on exactly the
same frequency.
The clandestine station programming consisted of patriotic and religious music and
intentionally
vague, confusing and contradictory military orders and information to the Iraqi
soldiers in the
Kuwaiti Theater of Command (KTO). The size and power of enemy forces was always
intentionally
exaggerated. Surrender was encouraged.
According to statements made by captured and deserting Iraqi soldiers, however, the
most
devastating and demoralizing programming was the first known military use of the
new, high tech,

“Hi-Tech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the Middle East', Bulletin, 23 March

1991, from ITV
(London) News Bureau Ltd. Available at:
http://www.democraticfundamentalism.org/2005/psychotronics/government/1991militarys
audisilentsou
nd.htm.
172

Page
76
type of subliminal messages referred to as ultra-high-frequency "silent sounds" or
"silent
subliminals."
Although completely silent to the human ear, the negative voice messages placed on
the tapes
alongside the audible programming by PSY-OPS psychologists were clearly perceived
by the
subconscious minds of the Iraqi soldiers and the silent messages completely
demoralized them
and instilled a perpetual feeling of fear and hopelessness in their minds.
It was necessary for the Iraqi tank commanders or another crew member to listen to
the FM station
24 hours each day for quickly changing deployment orders. They were being exposed
to the "silent
sounds" during the same listening periods.173

In addition, renowned United States reporter Bob Woodward, author of “All the
President’s
Men,” who helped to bring down the Nixon administration, has spoken about a
“incredible”
weapons system equivalent to the U.S. development of the Manhattan project, which
is
tantamount to the nuclear bomb and shrouded in secrecy, which was used in the 2nd
U.S. War
in Iraq, during the so-called “surge” of U.S. troops.
Woodward describes the weapons system as begin silent but lethal, and the basis for
up to 90%
of actionable United States intelligence in the war. Woodward later said that in
the future, people
would find out about the incredible technology used for this purpose. In another
interview on the
same topic, Woodward added that “the top secret operations, some day in history ...
will be
described to people's amazement." 174
18.2 Terrorist Brain Patterns Linked to Woodward’s Secret
Victim speculates that only a psychotronic weaponry system of the type described in
this
Petition would meet all the characteristics described by Woodward. 175
Victim further speculates that one of the core technological innovations involved
in the weapons
system to which Woodward refers is the ability to remotely detect and determine the
“brain
patterns” and intentions of individuals including, for example, terrorists.
As evidence of this, Victim highlights the work of Dr. John Norseen, a Lockheed
Martin
Corporation scientist and neuroscience researcher, who was cited in a Newsweek
magazine
cover story from 2000, “John Norseen: Reading Your Mind and Injecting Smart
Thoughts.”
In the story, Norseen stated that he had submitted a “plan to the Pentagon, at its
request, to
identify a terrorist’s mental profile” by remotely sensing an individual’s “brain
pattern.”
Ibid.
Woodward interview on CNN on the use of new techniques and operations during the
surge in Iraq:
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/09/09/iraq.secret/.
175
Reporter Bob Woodward discusses in an interview with Andrea Mitchell a new and top
secret
weapons system used during the “surge” of troops during the U.S. war in Iraq in
2007. Woodward says
that this weapons system is highly secret, silent and lethal, equates the
significance of the
development of this weapons system as being tantamount to “The Manhattan Project,”
which
developed the nuclear bomb. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=wLhOUFYjTDM.
173
174

Page
77
Newsweek says:
“Norseen's theories are grounded in current science. Mapping human brain functions
is now
routine. By viewing a brain scan recorded by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
machine,
scientists can tell what the person was doing at the time of the recording–say,
reading or writing.
Emotions from love to hate can be recognized from the brain's electrical activity.
“So could the murderous thoughts of a terrorist, asserts Norseen, who wrote his
thesis at the Naval
War College on applying neuroscience research to antiterrorism. He has submitted a
researchand-development plan to the Pentagon, at its request, to identify a
terrorist's mental profile.
A miniaturized brain-mapping device inside an airport metal detector would screen
passengers'
brain patterns against a dictionary of brain prints. Norseen predicts profiling by
brain print
will be in place by 2005.”

Victim speculates that Norseen’s concept of remotely identifying brain patterns of

terrorists was
the “game changing” technological development to which Bob Woodward repeatedly
refers to
as being highly effective during the Iraq surge, as well as other aspects of the
psychotronic
weapons system described in this Petition. Norseen died in 2007.
More recently, the “Brain Invaders” segment on Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory
television
program found that "mind control" technology has been used against Occupy Wall
Street
protesters and significant numbers of U.S. citizens by the Obama administration.176
18.3 A Billion-Dollar Psychotronic Arms Race
In a 2013 article, “Billion dollar race: Soviet Union vied with U.S. in “mind
control
research,”177 the author writes that:
“Competing with the U.S. during the Arms Race, the Soviet Union put extensive
effort in
unconventional research seeking to outflank its rival in understanding behavior
control, remote
influencing and parapsychology, a new survey has revealed.
The survey published by Cornell University Library is based on open scientific and
journalistic
materials and provides an overview of unconventional research in the U.S.S.R. and
then in its
successor, Russia, in the period between 1917 and 2003 – as compared to the U.S.A.”
“The report by Serge Kernbach showed that unconventional weapons took the
scientists in both
countries to areas bordering sci-fi…”
This article on this U.S. – Russia “psychotronic arms race” adds:

Jesse Ventura, “Brain Invaders,” Conspiracy Theory television show, segment

available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afaHkmyy5so.
177
See “Billion dollar race: Soviet Union vied with US in mind control research,” 17
December 2013, RT
website, available at: http://rt.com/news/psychotronic-arms-soviet-weapon-379/.
176
Page
78
“In the Soviet Union, among the areas of particular interest, were, for instance,
“the impact of weak
and strong electromagnetic emission on biological objects, quantum entanglement in
macroscopic
systems, nonlocal signal transmission based on the Aharonov-Bohm effect, and ‘human
operator’
phenomena,” the survey says.
In the 60s and the 70s, the Soviet Union was actively researching the influence of
electromagnetic
fields on human physiological and psychological conditions. Several authors point
to the application
of research results in the form of new weapons in the U.S.A and the Soviet Union.
“Over the past years, U.S. researchers have confirmed the possibility of affecting
functions of the
nervous system by weak electromagnetic fields (EMFs), as it was previously said by
Soviet
researchers. EMFs may cause acoustic hallucination (’radiosound’) and reduce the
sensitivity of
humans and animals to some other stimuli, to change the activity of the brain
(especially the
hypothalamus and the cortex), to break the processes of formation processing and
information
storage in the brain. These nonspecific changes in the central nervous system can
serve as a basis
for studying the possibilities of the direct influence of EMFs on specific
functions of CNS.”178

19. List of Selected Patents on Technology with Psychotronic Weaponry Potential

The following is a selected list of patents or patent applications and their
abstracts which cover
technology with the potential to be used in psychotronic weaponry systems.
They are segmented into three main categories:
1) patents covering silent communications technology, as well as mood modification
technology,
2) patents covering subvocal recognition (essentially, “reading of internal
dialogue/thoughts,” and
3) patents covering brain activity visualization and neuroimaging, such as
“functional
magnetic resonance imaging” and “functional electroencephalograms,” which can be
used for “Remote Neural Monitoring,” or accessing the visual cortex and auditory
cortex
of the brain to “see what the victim sees, hear what the victim hears.”
19.1 Patents Covering Silent Communications Technology, as well as Mood
Modification
Technology:
Patent 6011991, Communication System and Method Including Brain Wave
Analysis and/or Use of Brain Activity, Jan 4, 2000 179
A system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their
monitored brain
activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a
remote location (e.g. by
Ibid.
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US6011991?
dq=Patent+US+6011991&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ddveUsvOJ7StsQSkmoDIDQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
178
179

Page
79
satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with
pre-recorded
normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or
substantial
match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location
determines that
the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought
corresponding to the
matched stored normalized signal.

Patent 6470214 B1, Method and Device for Implementing the Radio Frequency
Hearing Effect, Oct 22, 2002180
A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor
filtering to produce an
encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor
filtering, intelligible
subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF
Hearing
Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband
(SSB) and carrier
suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.

Patent 6587729 B2, Apparatus for Audibly Communicating Speech Using the
Radio Frequency Hearing Effect, Jul 1, 2003181
A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor
filtering to produce an
encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor
filtering, intelligible
subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF
Hearing
Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband
(SSB) and carrier
suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.

Patent 5,159,703, Silent Subliminal Presentation, 27 October 1992182

A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or very
high audio
frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude or
frequency
modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or
vibrationally, for inducement
into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones or
piezoelectric transducers.
The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be
conveniently recorded
and stored on mechanical, magnetic or optical media for delayed or repeated
transmission to the
listener.

Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US6470214?

dq=PATENT+US+6470214+B1&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ltveUr72GbLNsATH14HwCQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
181
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US6587729?
dq=US+6587729+B2&hl=en&sa=X&ei=stveUsqsBue0sQSpsYC4Ag&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
182
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US5159703?
dq=5,159,703&hl=en&sa=X&ei=8dveUsiDEZWpsQS8-4D4BQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
180
Page
80
Patent 3,566,347 A, Psycho-Acoustic Projector, 23 February 1971183
Broadly, this disclosure is directed to a system for producing aural psychological
disturbances and
partial deafness of the enemy during combat situations. Essentially, a high
directional beam is
radiated from a plurality of distinct transducers and is modulated by a noise, code
or speech beat
signal. The invention may utilize various forms and may include movable radiators
mounted on a
vehicle and oriented to converge at a desired point, independently positioned
vehicles with a
common frequency modulator, or means employed to modulate the acoustical beam with
respect to
a fixed frequency. During combat, friendly forces would be equipped with a
reference generator to
provide aural demodulation of the projected signal, thereby yielding an
intelligible beat signal while
enemy personnel would be rendered partially deaf by the projected signal as well as
being unable
to perceive any intelligence transmitted in the form of a modulated beat signal.

Patent 5,289,438, Method and System for Altering Consciousness, 22 February

1994184
A system for altering the states of human consciousness involves the simultaneous
application of
multiple stimuli, preferable sounds, having differing frequencies and wave forms.
The relationship
between the frequencies of the several stimuli is exhibited by the equation
g=2.sup.n/4, where:
f=frequency of one stimulus; g=frequency of the other stimuli or stimulus; and n=a
positive or
negative integer which is different for each other stimulus.

19.2 Patents Covering Subvocal Recognition (Essentially, “Reading of Internal

Dialogue/Thoughts”):
Patent WO 2013166377 A1, Coupling an Electronic Skin Tattoo to a Mobile
Communication Device, Nov 7, 2013185
A system and method provides auxiliary voice input to a mobile communication device
(MCD). The
system comprises an electronic skin tattoo (110) capable of being applied to a
throat region of a
body. The electronic skin tattoo can include an embedded microphone (103); a
transceiver for
enabling wireless communication with the MCD; and a power supply (104) configured
to receive
energizing signals from a personal area network associated with the MCD. A
controller (101) is
communicatively coupled to the power supply. The controller can be configured to
receive a signal
from the MCD to initiate reception of an audio stream picked up from the throat
region of the body
for subsequent audio detection by the MCD under an improved signal-to-noise ratio
than without
the employment of the electronic skin tattoo.

Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US3566347?

dq=Patent+3,566,347+A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zNveUp3vCunJsQTo9oKYDQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
184
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US5289438?
dq=5,289,438&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ItzeUvn3NYnJsATPloDIBw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
185
Patent application description available at:
http://www.google.com/patents/WO2013166377A1?
cl=en
183

Page
81
Patent 20,060,129,394 A1, Method for Communicating Using Synthesized
Speech, 15 June 2006, (International Business Machines Corporation)186
The present invention is a method for communicating using synthesized speech
including the steps
of: capturing subvocal speech signals from a first party; applying subvocal speech
recognition to
the signals to generate speech text; and, transmitting the generated speech text to
a second party.

Patent 20100016752 A1, System and Method for Neurological Activity Signature
Determination, Discrimination, and Detection, application filed Jan 21, 2010187
A system and method are provided for automatically correlating neurological
activity to a
predetermined physiological response. The system includes at least one sensor
operable to sense
signals indicative of the neurological activity, and a processing engine coupled to
the sensor. The
processing engine is operable in a first system mode to execute a simultaneous
sparse
approximation jointly upon a group of signals sensed by the sensor to generate
signature
information corresponding to the predetermined physiological response. The system
further
includes a detector coupled to the sensors, which is operable in a second system
mode to monitor
the sensed signals. The detector generates upon selective detection according to
the signature
information a control signal for actuating a control action according to the
predetermined
physiological response.

Patent DE 102010003230 A1, Method for Controlling Machine Using

Contactless Human/Machine Interface, Involves Recording Noise Signal of
Signal Transmitter Based on Thoughts Given by Humans So That Data
Derived from Noise Signals is Stored in Element of Record, application filed
Sep 29, 2011
The method involves providing a signal transmitter with a component for exhibiting
a noise signal.
The optical projection of calibration data is performed through the arrangement of
signal transmitter
in spatial proximity. The noise signal of signal transmitter is recorded and
received based on the
thoughts given by humans so that the data derived from the noise signals is stored
in an element of
record due to comparison with calibration data and/or given reference datum. An
independent claim
is included for contactless human/machine interface.

Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US20060129394?

dq=20,060,129,394+A1&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SdzeUpXTJKXMsQTMiYDYBA&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
187
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US20100016752?
dq=US+20100016752&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IQrvUv_nD8OfkAfQ5oDQDQ&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA.
186

Page
82
19.3 Patents Covering Brain Activity Visualization and Neuroimaging, such as
“Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging” and “Functional
Electroencephalograms”
Patent 5,507,291 A, Method and an Associated Apparatus for Remotely
Determining Information as to a Person's Emotional State, April 16, 1996188
In a method for remotely determining information relating to a person's emotional
state, a waveform
having a predetermined frequency and a predetermined intensity is generated and
wirelessly
transmitted towards a remotely located subject. Waveform energy emitted from the
subject is
detected and automatically analyzed to derive information relating to the
individual's emotional
state. Physiological or physical parameters of blood pressure, pulse rate, pupil
size, respiration rate
and perspiration level are measured and compared with reference values to provide
information
utilizable in evaluating interviewee's responses or possibly criminal intent in
security sensitive
areas.

Patent 5,629,678 A, Personal Tracking and Recovery System, 13 May 1997189

Apparatus for tracking and recovering humans utilizes an implantable transceiver
incorporating a
power supply and actuation system allowing the unit to remain implanted and
functional for years
without maintenance. The implanted transmitter may be remotely actuated, or
actuated by the
implantee. Power for the remote-activated receiver is generated electromechanically
through the
movement of body muscle. The device is small enough to be implanted in a child,
facilitating use as
a safeguard against kidnapping, and has a transmission range which also makes it
suitable for
wilderness sporting activities. A novel biological monitoring feature allows the
device to be used to
facilitate prompt medical dispatch in the event of heart attack or similar medical
emergency. A novel
sensation-feedback feature allows the implantee to control and actuate the device
with certainty.

Patent U.S. 3951134 A, Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and
Altering Brain Waves, Apr 20, 1976190
Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a subject
whereby
electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to
the brain of the
subject in which the signals interfere with one another to yield a waveform which
is modulated by
the subject's brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of the
brain wave
activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where it is demodulated and
amplified. The
demodulated waveform is then displayed for visual viewing and routed to a computer
for further
processing and analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a
compensating
signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a desired change in
electrical activity therein.
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US8115472?
pg=PA1&dq=5,507,291+A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hdzeUoChI8i_sQS6nYDIDg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
189
Patent description available at: http://www.google.co.in/patents/US5629678.
190
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US3951134?
dq=US+3951134+A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=odzeUsHAN7e-sQTc44AY&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
188

Page
83
Patent U.S. 6011991 A, Communication System and Method Including Brain
Wave Analysis and/or Use of Brain Activity, Jan 4, 2000191
A system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their
monitored brain
activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a
remote location (e.g. by
satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with
pre-recorded
normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or
substantial
match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location
determines that
the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought
corresponding to the
matched stored normalized signal.

Patent U.S. 20120254087 A1, Electronic Brain Model with Neuron Tables,
application Oct 4, 2012192
A method of emulating the human brain with its thought and rationalization
processes is presented
here, as well as a method of storing human-like thought. The invention provides for
inclusion of
psychological profiles, experience and societal position in an electronic emulation
of the human
brain. This permits a realistic human-like response by that emulation to the people
and the
interactive environment around it.

Patent U.S. 8135957 B2, Access Control System Based on Brain Patterns, Mar
13, 2012193
The invention includes a control system and a method for access control of an
application system,
with electrically measurable data acquired as the result of a biometric reaction of
a user, the
biometric reaction triggered by stimulatory information presented to the user. An
acquisition means
for acquiring the electrically measurable data, a provision means for providing
reference data and a
comparison means for comparing the data are provided in the control system. The
reference data
is provided relating to the stimulatory information and/or the acquired,
electrically measurable data.
The acquired measurable data is compared with the provided reference data by means
of the
comparison means. An authorization of the user to the application system takes
place on the basis
of the comparison results. By means of this control system it is possible to
dynamically authorize
and identify a user with absolute reliability and to unambiguously authenticate
said user.

Patent WO 2001087153 A1, System for Detecting Brain Activity, Nov 22, 2001194
A system (10) for identifying brain activity, comprises a plurality of electrodes
(14), said electrodes
being arranged on a supporting structure (12) to be placed on a skull of a person,
said electrodes
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US6011991?
dq=6011991&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pgvvUueHKNPokAejooC4Cw&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA.
192
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US20120254087?
dq=US+20120254087+A1&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wtzeUuLIDIS-sQTb14HwBw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
193
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US8135957.
194
Patent description available at: https://www.google.com/patents/WO2001087153A1?
cl=en.
191

Page
84
(14) producing signals in accordance with the brainwaves of said person, amplifying
means for
amplifying the electrical signals sensed by said electrodes, data processing means
(26) for
processing said amplified signals, identifying a specific mental state from said
signals and
generating a signal indicative of said recognized mental state, and transmitter
means for
transmitting a signal corresponding to said identified mental state to a computer
(22).

20. Selected companies and agencies involved in development of psychotronic

weaponry or electronic warfare capabilities
There are any number of public and privately held companies which have developed or
released technology or components which have psychotronic applications, as well as
U.S.
government agencies which would handle aspects of a neuroweapons program.
The companies include:
20.1 Private Sector Companies with Potential to Develop Neuroweapons
Azimuth Incorporated195
Azimuth designs and manufactures unique electronic systems. Azimuth is a leader in
electronic
rapid prototyping, ruggedization, legacy systems redevelopment and military
applications.

Sierra Nevada Corporation196

SNC purchased the Waveband Corporation (original developer of the MEDUSA system,
described
earlier) in 2005. Sierra Nevada specializes in defense and space technology. Sierra
Nevada
Corporation is a prime integrator of systems and electronics. SNC is a high-tech
electronics,
engineering, and manufacturing corporation that continues to expand its portfolio
of capabilities,
programs, products and services.

Mantech Corporation197
A multi-billion-dollar public company that provides technology for defense,
intelligence, law
enforcement, science, administration, and other fields—throughout the nation and in
many
countries throughout the world.

195
196
197

Available at: http://www.azimuthinc.com.

Available at: http://www.sncorp.com/about_snc.php.
Available at:
http://www.mantech.com/about/Documents/ManTechCorporateBrochure_June2012.pdf.

Page
85
General Dynamics198
General Dynamics is a market leader in business aviation; combat vehicles, weapons
systems and
munitions; shipbuilding and marine systems; and mission-critical information
systems and
technology. The company was formed in 1952 through the combination of the Electric
Boat
Company, Consolidated Vultee (CONVAIR) and several others.

Lockheed Martin199
Aviation, aerospace and defense contractor. Lockheed Martin Information Systems &
Global
Solutions is comprised of 26,000 workers in information technology solutions,
management
services, and advanced technology expertise.

Northrop Grumman200
Northrop Grumman is a leading global security company providing innovative systems,
products
and solutions in unmanned systems, cyber, C4ISR, and logistics and modernization to
government
and commercial customers worldwide.

SRI International201
Among other areas, focuses on advanced sensing technologies, including high-
performance,
intelligent sensing devices, which are used for monitoring threats to national
security. For a variety
of national defense and intelligence needs, SRI develops and performs field tests
on novel optical
and biological sensors.

Electronic Warfare Associates (EWA Government Systems, Inc.) 202

Known for its electronic warfare expertise and engineering prowess in cyber-
security and cyberdefense, radar development, EW software and hardware products, as
well as expertise in test &
evaluation, miniaturization & microelectronics, EW training and simulation
products, and its unique
tagging, tracking and locating technology.

198
199
200
201
202

Available
Available
Available
Available
Available

at:
at:
at:
at:
at:

http://www.generaldynamics.com/about/corporate-overview/.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/.
http://www.northropgrumman.com/AboutUs/Pages/default.aspx.
http://www.sri.com/.
http://www.ewa-gsi.com/ewa_gsi_working.htm.

Page
86
Wyle Laboratories203
Wyle is recognized as a leading provider of specialized engineering, scientific,
and technical
services to the Department of Defense, NASA, and a variety of commercial customers.
With 4,600
highly specialized and dedicated employees at 50-plus primary facilities
nationwide, the company
generates annual revenues of approximately $1.1 billion from its core customers,
the Department
of Defense, NASA, and the nation’s leading aerospace contractors.

203

http://www.wyle.com/AboutWyle/Pages/default.aspx.

Page
87
Page
88
Organizational Chart of the U.S. Surveillance and Intelligence Community
Directorate of National Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
United States Department of Defense
National Security Agency (NSA)
National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)
National Security Center
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
Defense Intelligence Agency – Missile and Space Intelligence Center
DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)
Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
Agency (AFISRA)
Air Mobility Command
Air Intelligence Agency
Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM)
Army Test and Evaluation Command
Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA)
Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI)
Naval Warfare Center
United States Department of Energy
Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (OICI)
United States Department of Homeland Security
Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A)
Coast Guard Intelligence (CGI)
United States Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Branch (FBI/NSB)
Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of National Security
Intelligence (DEA/ONSI)
United States Department of State
Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR)
United States Department of the Treasury

Page
89
Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI)

Page
90
21. Targeted Individuals Phenomenon in U.S. and Worldwide
Victim states that, because of his knowledge of potentially extremely damaging
information
about the Obama administration’s links to organized crime, he has become what is
known as a
“Targeted Individual.”
Targeted Individuals are of a new kind of government political prisoner whose mind
is invaded
on a routine basis by psychogenic weapons of the NSA, CIA and DOD, or other more
sinister
agencies whose names classified, who deem them to be dissidents.204
Targeted Individuals can be persons seen as a threat to the government, and lose
their freedom
not necessarily through imprisonment, but rather are taken as virtual political
prisoners of the
administration in power without due process, trial or sentencing.
Targeted Individuals may be tortured at will by psy-ops officers making use of the
ultimate secret
weapon of mass destruction – the psychogenic weapons system which wirelessly
communicates through “synthetic telepathy,” leaving no proof, no evidence of the
horrific
damage electronic stalking can do to the psyche.205
This torture includes the use of aforementioned “Voice of God” technology, the
existence of
which has been confirmed by a former senior CIA technical expert, Dr. Robert
Duncan, on the
Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory program, among many other sources.206
According to a 2012 article, “Mass Secret Torture Of American Citizens Confirmed by
CIA
Engineer,”207 Dr. Robert Duncan revealed to Jesse Ventura that:
“the government is doing this” with “Voice of God (VOG) weapons” that he (Duncan)
helped
develop. Duncan stated that the antenna weapon abuse is “absolutely” happening to
American
citizens today, who are being “worse than abused, they are being tortured.” Duncan
has degrees
from Harvard and MIT, and worked for the government and CIA immediately upon
graduation. He
says he no longer works on the VOG antenna program, although he was one of the
chief engineers
during its inception.”

The article on Duncan added:

Jesse Ventura, “Brain Invaders,” Conspiracy Theory television program, available

at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afaHkmyy5so.
205
Ibid.
206
“Mass Secret Torture of American Citizens Confirmed by CIA Engineer,” Nowfact
Website, 18
December 2012, available at: http://nowfact.com/mass-secret-torture-of-american-
citizens-confirmedby-cia-engineer/.
207
Ibid.
204

Page
91
“Duncan said that the GWEN tower emergency system could easily be transformed and
used to
broadcast the signals to cause the painful effects that thousands of TI’s (Targeted
Individuals) have
reported. Duncan said the reason for the antenna weapon attacks on targeted
citizens is “world
domination, control the populace, from subconsciously to consciously.” Ventura
replied “now
we have a motive, controlling the world, controlling dissenters, controlling you
and me.”

22. Speculation on Basic Components of U.S. Psychotronic Weapons System

Victim speculates that the United States Military/ Intelligence services may have
carried out
electronic torture of Victim using the following constellation of technology:
22.1 A 13 Billion-Square-Mile Space-Based Radio Telescope Array
Victim speculates that it may be technically possible for there to be a massive
space-based
radio telescope array using radio antennas present in the U.S. reconnaissance
satellite system.
Since radio antennas operate most efficiently in an array of smaller radio
telescopes, and since
U.S. reconnaissance satellites orbit at 25,000 miles above the Earth, a rough
calculation of the
size of this radio telescope array which surrounds the Earth would be approximately
13 billion
square miles.
An antenna of such an enormous size would give this radio telescope array
incredible
sensitivity, possibiliy allowing it to pick up the minute electrical signals
emitted by human
beings on Earth.
Such a system, combined with supercomputers such as those used by the National
Security
Agency (NSA), would allow for both detecting and interpreting humans’
subvocalizations
(internal thoughts, or covert speech), as well as perform “remote neural
monitoring” by detecting
signals in the visual and auditory cortexes.
Under the system that Victim speculates is being used for widespread torture, the
brain waves
corresponding to specific images, words or phrases are automatically categorized by
advanced
algorithms by supercomputers, and matched against a data repository of past brain
wave
recordings, as described in the aforementioned “patent U.S. 6011991 A,
Communication
System and Method Including Brain Wave Analysis and/or use of Brain Activity,”
which states:
“A system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their
monitored brain
activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a
remote location (e.g. by
satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with
pre-recorded
normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or
substantial
match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location
determines that
the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought
corresponding to the
matched stored normalized signal.”

Page
92
These supercomputers would also store the unique “brain patters” of all individuals
on Earth,
allowing covert agencies to remotely, and in a targeted manner, access the brains
of any given
individual at any given time.
“Silent Sound” communications could be projected in a targeted manner into the
minds of
victims using pulsed microwaves/ UHF or VHF transmissions, leveraging the microwave
auditory effect, as described previously in this Petition.
22.2 Microwave, UHF or VHF? Our Entire Bodies are SIGINT (Signals Intelligence)
The microwave/ UHF or VHF signals could be transmitted in any number of ways: via
satellite,
via cellular telephone towers, microwave transmitters or embedded in television or
radio
broadcast signals. So-called GWEN towers, which are microwave towers built in the
U.S. during
the Cold War to preserve communications during a nuclear strike, could also be used
to transmit
so-called “Voice to Skull” technology, as explained above by former CIA engineer
and contractor
Dr. Duncan.208
Victim states that research presented in this Petition provides overwhelming
evidence that such
technologies exist and, in fact, are being used to carry out experimentation,
perhaps leading to
routine, non-democratic targeting of individuals, sectors of the population and the
population as
a whole, which Victim states would be a gross violation of the human rights of
every human
being on Earth.
Victim urges a serious and in-depth investigation of the psychotronic weapons
capabilities of
nation states, and Victim states that a global ban on such weapons should be a high
priority for
multilateral organizations such as the European Parliament, the United Nations
(UN), the
Organizations of American States (OAS) and other agencies.
Victim notes that, as previously stated by the Asian Human Rights Commission in
this Petition,
“The threat is real…brain technology for neuroweapons is scientifically possible.
Additionally,
some say such technologies have been used systematically against select people in
various
jurisdictions.”

23. Victim’s Closing Statement

Victim states that urgent attention to the main issues raised in this Petition is
required to prevent
the virtual “mental enslavement” of individuals, sectors of the population, or the
global
population as a whole.
Victim notes that his torture has taken place in an environment in which the
President of the
European Parliament, Martin Schulz, has said that U.S. secret services are “out of
control,” and

Description of GWEN towers available at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/URC117_Ground_Wave_Emergency_Network.
208
Page
93
it is now known that the U.S. has, with the knowledge of the Commander in Chief
Barack
Obama, engaged in spying on a massive level.
Victim closes this statement of the human rights abuses committed against him with
a statement
from former National Security Agency contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden,
who
stated in a 2013 Christmas address:
“A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all. They'll
never know what it
means to have a private moment to themselves -- an unrecorded, unanalyzed
thought.”209

209

Edward Snowden statement available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqkpxMrxWkI.

Page
94
3. AUTHORITIES ALLEGEDLY
RESPONSIBLE
Identify the person(s) or authorities who you consider
responsible for the facts alleged and provide any
additional information as to why you consider the
State responsible for the alleged violation(s).
Victim alleges that the Government of the United
States of America and its military / intelligence
agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the
Department of Defense (DoD), acting on behalf of
President Barack Obama, are responsible for his
torture.
Victim also considers the United States Embassy in
Mexico to have colluded in abuses of his human rights
and that there is widespread knowledge of the Victim’s
situation among embassy staff, including Ambassador
Anthony Wayne and representatives of the DEA, the
CIA and the FBI.
Victim believes these agencies to be responsible for
his ongoing torture because he was repeatedly told by
his Torturers that the CIA, NSA and DoD were
responsible for his torture, and in addition victim was
threatened with kidnapping in person by after hours
CIA duty officers at the U.S. embassy in Mexico City.

Page
95
4. HUMAN RIGHTS ALLEGEDLY VIOLATED
Indicate the rights that you consider have been
violated. If possible, specify the rights protected by
the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties
of Man, the American Convention on Human
Rights, or the other Inter-American human rights
treaties. If you wish to consult a list of the rights or
treaties, see the Petition and Case System:
Informational Brochure, in particular the section
referring to Human Rights in the Inter-American System.
VICTIM’S RIGHTS VIOLATED IN
AMERICAN
DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF
MAN
Article I.

Right to life, liberty and personal

security.
Article II.
Right to equality before law.
Article V.
Right to protection of honor,
personal reputation, and private
and family life.
Article VI.
Right to a family and to protection
thereof.
Article VIII.
Right to residence and
movement.
Article XIV.
Right to work and to fair
remuneration.
Article XV.
Right to leisure time and to the
use thereof.
Article XVII.
Right to recognition of juridical
personality and civil rights.
Article XVIII. Right to a fair trial.
Article XXV.
Right of protection from arbitrary
arrest.
Page
96
Article XXVI.

Right to due process.

VICTIM’S RIGHTS VIOLATED IN AMERICAN

CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 4.
Article 5.
Article 6.
Article 7.
Article 8.
Article 10.
Article 11.
Article 13.
Article 17.
Article 20.
Article 24.

Right to Life
Right to Humane Treatment
Freedom from Slavery
Right to Personal Liberty
Right to a Fair Trial
Right to Compensation
Right to Privacy
Freedom of Thought and
Expression
Rights of the Family
Right to Nationality
Right to Equal Protection

SECTION III. LEGAL REMEDIES

PURSUED TO RESOLVE THE
FACTS ALLEGED
Describe the actions pursued by the alleged victim
or the petitioner before the judicial bodies. Explain
any other remedy pursued before domestic
authorities, including administrative agencies, if
any.

As this has been a case of cross-border human rights

violations, the United States constitution or laws do
not apply to this case. Victim has been in Latin
America for the duration of torture, therefore no
domestic remedies have been sought.

Page
97
Victim filed a complaint against the Central
Intelligence Agency before Mexican judicial authorities
to place threats against Victim on the record. A copy of
this complaint is attached to this Petition.
Victim is unable to access additional domestic
remedies in the U.S. Court system because he has
been continuously outside of the United States of
America during the period in which his human rights
have been violated.

Victim notes that his case falls into the exceptions on

exhausting domestic remedies as stated in the OAS
guidelines.

A. domestic laws do not provide due process to

protect the rights allegedly violated;
B. the alleged victim has not been allowed access to
domestic remedies or has been kept from exhausting
them; or If it has not been possible to exhaust
domestic remedies, choose from the following options
the one that best explains why it was not possible:

(√ ) the domestic laws do not

ensure due process for the
protection of the rights
allegedly violated;
( ) access to domestic remedies has not
been permitted, or exhausting them
has been impeded;
( ) there has been unwarranted delay in issuing
a final decision in the case.
Page
98
Please explain the reasons:

Since the victim, a U.S. Citizen, has not been in U.S.

territory since his situation began, the United States
constitution and its laws are not applicable to him. The
OAS Human Rights Committee is the sole body able
to review this situation in an expeditious manner.

Page
99
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

Indicate whether there was a judicial investigation. Indicate when it began, when
it ended, and the result. If
it has not concluded, indicate why.

If applicable, indicate the date of notification of the final decision:

________/________/________(day/month/year).

SECTION IV. AVAILABLE

EVIDENCE
1. EVIDENCE
The available evidence includes any documents that may prove the violations alleged
(for
example, the principal pleadings and exhibits in judicial or administrative
records, expert
reports, forensic reports, photographs, and video or film recordings, among
others).


If possible, attach a simple copy of these documents. (The copies do not need to be
certified or legally authenticated).
 Please do not attach originals.
 If it is not possible to send the documents, you should explain why and indicate
whether
you will be able to send them in the future. In any event, you should indicate
which
documents are relevant to proving the facts alleged.


The documents should be in the language of the State, so long as it is an official

language of the OAS (Spanish, English, Portuguese, or French). If this is not
possible,
the reasons should be explained.

List or indicate the evidence that is the basis of your Petition, and, if possible,
identify which
evidence you are attaching or sending with your Petition:

Victim is attaching a police complaint against the Central Intelligence Agency.

Victim attaches a letter written and delivered to the Mexican Congress,
multilateral organizations
and foreign embassies in Mexico.

Page
100
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

Victim provides extensive documentary evidence and research in his Petition on the
weapons
system he alleges has been used to persecute him, in the form of references and
Internet links to
relevant sources.

2. WITNESSES
Identify, if possible, the witnesses to the alleged violations. If those persons
have given
statements to the judicial authorities, send, if possible, a simple copy of the
witness statements
given to the judicial authorities, or indicate whether you will be able to send
them in the future.
Indicate whether it is necessary to keep the identity of the witnesses
confidential.
Due to the unique circumstances of the electronic torture inflicted on Victim, the
results of the
torture are not visible to the naked eye and thus it is not possible to provide
eyewitness evidence of
torture against Victim.

SECTION V. OTHER COMPLAINTS LODGED

Indicate whether these facts have been presented to the Human Rights Committee of
the United Nations
or any other international organization:
No √ Yes If yes, indicate which organization:

SECTION VI. PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES

In certain serious and urgent situations, the Commission may ask a State to adopt
precautionary measures to prevent irreparable harm to persons or to the subject
matter of
the proceedings.
For the criteria the Commission has used in practice, you may go to www.cidh.org,
where a
summary of the granted precautionary measures is periodically published.
If you wish to submit an application for precautionary measures, please refer to
the Petition and
Case System: Informational Brochure, in particular the section entitled Serious and
Urgent
Situations.
Indicate whether there is a serious and urgent situation of risk of irreparable
harm to persons
or to the subject matter of the proceedings.
N o Yes √

Page
101
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

If yes, please explain the reasons:

Victim argues that ongoing torture inflicted upon him, which has lasted
approximately 17 months as
of the date of filing of this Petition, constitutes a “serious and urgent”
situation.
Victim alleges that the continuous torture inflicted upon him justifies a call for
precautionary
measures.
Victim notes that a similar complaint was filed by ousted Honduran President Zelaya
with the
Permanent Council of the Organization of American States (OAS), and an OAS
statement
denounced and condemned:
“the hostile action by the de facto regime against the embassy of Brazil in
Tegucigalpa and the
harassment of its occupants through deliberate actions that affect them physically
and
psychologically and violate their human rights. The Permanent Council calls on the
de facto regime
to put an immediate end to these actions, to respect the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic
Relations and international instruments on human rights, and to withdraw forthwith
all repressive
forces from the areas surrounding the Embassy of Brazil, without neglecting the due
security of the
Mission. The Permanent Council appeals for guarantees for the right to life,
integrity, and security
of President José Manuel Zelaya Rosales and of all persons in and around the
Embassy of Brazil,
as well as for the protection of their dignity, and it urges the Inter-American
Commission on Human
Rights to follow up on this situation.”210
Victim also argues that constant threats against his daughter and his daughter’s
mother, who
reside in Mexico, justify a call for precautionary measures.
In addition, Victim argues that constant threats against his daughter and his
daughter’s mother,
who reside in the Philippines, also justify a call for precautionary measures.
Victim states that constant threats against his mother, who resides in Costa Rica,
also justify a call
for precautionary measures.

END OF PETITION

Organization of American States (OAS) “CONDEMNATION OF THE ACTS OF INTIMIDATION

AGAINST
THE EMBASSY OF BRAZIL IN HONDURAS,” (Approved by the OAS Permanent Council at its
meeting of
October 21, 2009), available at: http://www.oas.org/consejo/resolutions/dec43.asp.
210

Page
102
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

24. Life, Interrupted

More than a year after my four suicide attempts, I am trying to resume a life
interrupted.
At the age of 44, after living with my mother in San Jose, Costa Rica for over a
year, I am now
pondering making a formal request for asylum status as a torture victim in a
European country.
I hope to soon be explaining to immigration officials that I am a “electronic
refugee,” unable to
return to my home country because I had been an apparent eyewitness to the Obama
Administration’s organized crime ties and was subsequently tormented using high-
tech
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).
Getting asylum may be a difficult prospect; there is a good chance they will not
believe me, or
that they will label me as mentally ill.
It would not be the first time.
But it is a risk I have to take.
I will try to explain to them that I have been tortured so far for 17 months and
was incited to
suicide on four times over a series of days from December 9- December 12, 2012,
undergoing
brutal “no-touch” psychological torture in what I see as being tantamount to four
counts of
attempted murder with multiple accessories, starting with my Torturers.
24.1 A Public Death
Staging a public suicide is not as easy as it might seem.
Yes, you can get attention. But it might not be the kind of attention you’re
seeking.
A legitimate protest can be viewed as a delusion to a psychiatric community trained
to believe
that neuroweapons are mythical, futuristic technologies.
My first suicide attempt was made in private.
I took a full box of Atenolol , a beta-blocker which I hoped would slow my heart
sufficiently so
that I would die in my sleep.
At this point, I still hadn’t considered making my suicide public, and there was no
real drama in
my bedroom - I just took the box of pills, lay down in the early afternoon and
slept.
No witnesses.

Page
103
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

It was a sincere attempt to end my life, but it failed; I clearly did not take a
fatal dose. I awoke
three hours later without even a headache.
My next attempt, made the following afternoon, also bordered on comical.
After my first attempt with pharmaceuticals, I had determined that a public suicide
would better
serve the dual goals of ending my suffering, as well as alerting the world to the
threat of
psychotronic weapons.
To that end, I decided to commit suicide in front of a national media in Costa
Rica, La Nacion,
the country’s newspaper of record.
My aim was to use my public suicide as a planned political protest of what I had
come to
understand, after extensive research, as being “silent sound” torture inflicted by
a team of PSYOPS professionals, perhaps linked to the White House and/or organized
crime.
As stated in the Petition, I sought to emulate Buddhist monks who have self-
emolliated in
protest of Chinese occupation.
My life and the lives of my family members had been threatened thousands of times
by my
Torturers.
My public suicide, my thinking went, would lead to attention and exposure of the
human rights
abuses committed against me. It would also release me from the torment of constant
threats
against me and my family.
24.2 Nothing Goes as Planned
Days before, I had purchased a small $5.00 switchblade knife from a Chinese
importer in San
Jose.
Even new, the blade was not sharp – I even had to ask a neighbor to help me sharpen
it with a
whetstone.
I arrived at La Nacion on a Sunday – and there was a children’s Christmas party
taking place in
the parking lot.
To avoid a bloody public suicide amid the stuffed animals, presents and balloons, I
waited for
more than two hours at the bus stop across the street while the party wound down.
Apart from some curious glances from a security guard, no one paid any attention to
me and, it
being Sunday, the newspaper was largely closed, frustrating my plan to use my
suicide to
attempt to alert the media of my torture and Obama’s apparent corruption.

Page
104
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

Finally the flow of children into and out of the parking lot subsided and, despite
a lack of
witnesses, sitting in an alcove of the locked front door of La Nacion, I tried to
use my new knife
to cut my own throat.
But I couldn’t do it, because the blade was no sharper than a butter knife, despite
my attempts
to hone it.
After a few half-hearted attempts to cut into my neck, I gave up and took a taxi to
the
supermarket near my mother’s home, bought a new paring knife which I hoped would be
sharp
enough to cut through skin, and vowed to try again another day.
Three days later, I was ready for another public attempt.
My Torturers, who have said that they are professionally trained CIA/NSA or
military agents or
outsourced PSYOPS operatives, clearly expert in interrogation and “no-touch”
torture, finally
had incited me, by constantly threatening that my family members would be tortured
and killed,
to again attempt public suicide, not just once, but twice in the same day.
I had by now written multiple suicide notes which I intended to serve as
testimonials to the
media explaining why I chose death over the unbearable daily burden of constant
torture by hitech thought police.
One letter was addressed to my wife and daughter.
Others were addressed to officials who I naively hoped would use them to expose
Obama’s
corruption and the anti-democratic measures taken by his administration against me.
My efforts to use my public suicide and accompanying notes to expose the torture
inflicted on
me, however, would ultimately be in vain.
Without hard evidence, victims of psychotropic weapons are routinely treated as
psychotic,
delusional or schizophrenic, rather than the virtual political prisoners and
torture victims that
they are.
There are occasional notable exceptions of electromagnetic torture victims being
taken
seriously, however; examples would be ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya, as
well as
Tek Nath Rizal and James Soong, all mentioned in my petition.
Referring to the latter two, Cheryl Welsh, recognized as an expert in so-called
“non-lethal
weapons” by United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, wrote:
“Now two prominent figures have alleged political oppression via mind control
weapons, raising
serious new concerns about the persistent allegations. Tek Nath Rizal, an
internationally
recognized activist, exposed corruption in Bhutan and the King sent him to prison
in 1988. Rizal
claimed that he was tortured in prison with electromagnetic radiation (EMR) mind
control
technologies in a very brutal medieval fashion. The U.S. Department of State and
Amnesty
Page
105
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

International pressed for his release and after ten years in prison, Rizal received
a government
pardon. In 2011, Rizal wrote the book Torture, Killing Me Softly and eloquently
described his horrific
experience. Another case was recently reported in Asian newspapers. Ruey Lin, the
running mate
of Taiwan opposition presidential candidate James Soong, claimed he had come under
attack from
"electromagnetic waves" launched by a local intelligence unit.” 211

24.3 A Suicide Note

This is my letter to N and A, my wife and daughter, hastily written as I was being
threatened with
their torture or murder, and as I prepared to save them through my own death.
My beloved kittens:
You don’t know how much I love you both. You are the loves of my life.
Unfortunately, there is a situation beyond my control, an international conspiracy.
I can no longer be
with you, because I have been tortured by the administration of Barack Obama, the
CIA and the
National Security Agency.
I want you to know that I am totally innocent, but the torture has been such that I
can no longer
stand it. You don’t know how much I love and adore you, and I will be waiting for
you in heaven.
The government of the United States is too powerful, and I can no longer fight it.
A and N, I love you more than anything.
I leave this world in peace because I know that I am innocent, but I cannot resist
the constant
torture.
I have been the victim of circumstances beyond my control, and I can fight no
longer.
I love you more than anything, and I’ll be waiting for you.
I love you forever.
Daddy

24.4 12/12/12
My first suicide of my final two suicide attempts, on December 12, 2012, or
12/12/12, was
planned to take place at Channel 7 news, across the street from a large, leafy
central park in
San Jose which holds the National Stadium.
I got there as the reporters were starting their workday. Camera crews were loading
up black
SUVs as they prepared to spread out through the city to get their stories for the
nightly news.
Cheryl Welsh, “Mind control targeting: Science fiction or a new form of hi-tech
torture?,” available
at: http://mindjustice.org/torture.htm.
211

Page
106
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

I was hoping to be the lead story.

But once there, I found that I was unable to cut my throat and end my life with
witnesses, let
alone for national broadcast, and I so retreated to the nearby park to make my
attempt in
private.
There, desperate to end my torture, I walked a few hundred meters, found a tree,
lay down,
scattered my suicide notes around on the ground, and began cutting into my neck.
Cutting your own throat is a difficult prospect.
You normally have to work up to making cuts which are deep enough to cause serious
damage.
There are usually what are referred to as “hesitation marks,” or the preliminary
shallow efforts to
incise the skin before you find that that the pain of a knife and the prospect of
relief through
death do not compare with the psychological pain of constant torture.
That’s when the deep cuts begin.
It was my imperative to dramatically protest the actions taken by the Obama
administration
against me.
My torturers egged me one, urging me to find a “pulse point” and end the life of
the sole
eyewitness to Obama’s organized crime ties. “There’s a pulse point, John, there’s a
pulse point,”
they repeated.
I was able to make some shallow cuts to my neck, but before I could cut a major
blood vessel, a
passerby called police.
Horse-mounted officers arrived and held me down. I tried to explain my
circumstances to them,
but they didn’t listen or care. Nor did they have any interest in my suicide notes,
which they
collected and kept, but did not read, assuming that I was a lunatic.
A Red Cross ambulance arrived minutes later to take me to a nearby emergency room.
There, I received 8 stitches.
When the doctor stepped away, I got up and slipped out the emergency room exit, my
shirt still
soaked with blood.
From there, I quickly went and bought an inexpensive new T-shirt.
My Torturers urged me to attempt suicide again, and having already failed once that
day, I
wanted to die more than ever.

Page
107
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

I bought a boxcutter knife for three dollars, and hailed a taxi to La Nacion.
The driver asked me about the stiches on my neck and the blood- I told him I had
slipped
climbing over a fence.
24.5 What it Feels Like to Torture Someone to Death
I can still feel the pop when the boxcutter pierced the skin on my neck as I sought
to sever my
carotid artery, crouched next to a parked car 75 meters from La Nacion newspaper in
San Jose,
Costa Rica.
This time I cut the left side of my neck, having already failed with the right side
earlier.
Blood came, and I kept cutting into my neck, sticking my fingers in the wounds to
search for a
major blood vessel.
I even cut out a small piece of muscle, the sternocleidomastoid.
It looked a very small, raw filet minon. I threw it under the car.
Even with my training as an Emergency Medical Technician, it was difficult to
direct my
boxcutter at a major blood vessel.
But my Torturers egged me on, threatening my wife and daughter with death or
torture if I didn’t
finish the job.
A few passerby glanced nervously at me but did not intervene as
I finally cut my jugular vein and blood poured down my shirt. I stood up to
approach La Nacion
and finish the job in front of a major media outlet.
This time, a Wednesday, there were tens of witnesses, but as I neared the
newspaper, police
cars, sirens screaming, started to arrive.
Within seconds I was surrounded by over a dozen officers, weapons drawn, including
a
submachine gun, shouting orders at me to “put down the knife!,” which I refused to
do.
A photographer holding a camera with an enormous lens photographed the scene.
The police chased me, and as I ran by the photographer, she screamed.
Police officers tackled me and wrestled me to the ground.
I insisted that I was not psychotic, but making a political protest. I begged them
to remove
pressure from my wounds.

Page
108
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

They ignored me, and a fireman cut off my shirt as a bandage to try to stem the
flow from my
bleeding neck.
In the ambulance, I focused on my wife and daughter for what I hoped would be my
last
thoughts.
And, still thinking of them, I fainted.
When I woke up, I was intubated and on a gurney.
I had survived emergency surgery to repair my jugular vein and close massive gashes
in my
neck requiring 40 more stiches.
As I regained consciousness, my Torturers chatted amongst themselves. Once said to
another,
“so that’s what it’s like to torture someone to death.”
And all that night, after I had been transferred to the Ear, Nose and Throat
recovery room, they
tortured me more, urging me to rip out the stiches that had saved my life hours
before.
I freed myself from restraints and tried repeatedly to pull the stiches out, but
could not.

25. The End of Privacy

Regardless of what you think of my concrete case, it is my hope that my Petition
has convinced
you that psychotronic weaponry is a reality which, left unchecked, poses a grave
danger to the
human rights of the global population.
In today’s context of an out-of-control police/surveillance state, is it really so
hard to imagine that
the U.S. military possesses and has used such “mind control” weaponry against
enemies and
even against its own population?
The advent of the perfection of psychotronic weapons is taking place at a time of
revelations of
mass surveillance using traditional means, such as the NSA’s collection of metadata
on U.S.
telephone calls, its spying on Internet traffic and countless other violations of
our civil and
human rights.
Some selected stories from 2013 - early 2014 show just how far the U.S.
intelligence community
has run amok - and that only covers what we know about thanks to Snowden.
NSA "is harvesting hundreds of millions of contact lists from personal e-mail and
instant messaging
accounts around the world."— Washington Post
NSA "has secretly broken into the main communications links that connect Yahoo and
Google data
centers around the world."— Washington Post
NSA "is secretly piggybacking” on Internet advertisers' "cookies" and location data
“to pinpoint
targets for government hacking and to bolster surveillance."— Washington Post
Page
109
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

NSA "officers on several occasions have channeled their agency's enormous

eavesdropping power
to spy on love interests."— New York Times
NSA "is gathering nearly 5 billion records a day on the whereabouts of cellphones
around the
world."— Washington Post

There has been an explosion of new technologies – such as killer/spy drones and
increasingly
sophisticated consumer robotics, not to mention inexpensive commercially available
Brain –
Computer Interfaces (BCIs) which allow for controlling computers or other
technology by
thought alone.212
But does anyone really believe that it is just the metadata, and not the content of
our
conversations that is routinely stored, filtered, sifted through, classified and
listened to if deemed
necessary?
If so, those are the people I really feel sorry for – after all, it has been common
knowledge that
the Echelon program alone has been recording all telephone conversations since as
far back as
the 1960s, with the Five Eyes nations sharing signals intelligence.213
And that is just one among dozens of secret spy programs that have been exposed.
The threat is especially evident now, when even our unvoiced thoughts, not to
mention what we
hear and see on a real time basis, can be subject to remote sensing, and our brains
can quite
easily be “hacked.”214
It should be painfully clear that even if one is not a government “target,” the
full content of
everything we say is recorded, even when we are “offline.”
Today, intelligence services are able to build a complex web of information which
combines the
live microphones and cameras in our cellphones and computers as well as other
means, such
as tracking our online and mobile movements, satellite GPS tracking, voice
recognition, facial
recognition, gait analysis and remote fingerprint scanning, nanotechnogies and
surveillance
cameras, with real time access to our entire life records, concordances of contacts
and other
more cutting edge technologies, such as remote neural monitoring using the minute
electrical
currents given off by the human body and picked up through remote neuroimaging
systems,
A Brain-Computer Interface is already available for under $100 on Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/NeuroSky-Brainwave-Starter-Kit/dp/B00B8BF4EM/ref=sr_1_sc_2?
ie=UTF8&qid=1392755407&sr=8-2-spell&keywords=neuralsky.
213
The Five Eyes are nations which are signatories to the UKUSA Agreement - the post-
war top secret
agreement for intelligence sharing between the United States and the United Kindom.
Signed by
representatives of the London Signals Intelligence Board and its American
counterpart in March 1946,
the UKUSA Agreement formed the basis for co-operation among the countries
throughout the Cold War.
Available at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukusa/.
214
Sebastian Anthony, “Hackers backdoor the human brain, successfully extract
sensitive data,”
Extremetech, August 17, 2012, available at:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/134682-hackersbackdoor-the-human-brain-
successfully-extract-sensitive-data.
212

Page
110
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

possibly in a space-based system or even using ground-based radio telescopes, and

all of it
filtered through NSA algorithms.
This system includes all or some of diabolical psychogenic weapons system which has
been
used against me for over 17 months and counting.
As stated in the Petition, technology to leverage the so-called “microwave auditory
effect” or the
"radio frequency hearing effect" has been leapt forward so that intelligence
services are able to
home in on the specific brain pattern of their victims, using satellites, Wi-Fi,
cellular towers and
other sources of spectrum radiation to produce a kaleidoscope of actionable
intelligence – not
unlike how the NSA can remotely hack computers using radio waves.
Think of the television show Person of Interest or Terminator's Skynet, just 100
times worse –
because now surveillance includes monitoring and tracking of your thoughts,
experiences and
emotions.
Using “synthetic telepathy” and “Silent Sound Spread Spectrum” or similar
classified technology
with the same purpose, psychotronic weaponry is able to implant and receive
thoughts of
human beings wirelessly, enable "remote viewing” by PSYOPS teams, which are usually
military-trained and then contracted out by the Defense Department, NSA or the CIA,
or are part
of the agencies themselves.215
The government and major corporations in the United States, such as Google, hold
dozens of
patents which are related to psychotronics, and there is every evidence that DARPA
and other
dark government agencies have invested billions of dollars in advanced neuroscience
technology.216
25.1 Brain Taps
In today’s context of Orwellian surveillance, where even the President of the
European
Parliament, Martin Shulz, has stated that the U.S. intelligence structure is “out
of control,” it
should come as no surprise that we are now subject not only to phone taps, but also
to “brain
taps.”
In my Petition, I provide irrefutable evidence that the U.S. military and
clandestine services have
secretly developed and used what are termed by the U.S. Army to be “Voice of God”
or “Voice to
Skull” devices which emit pulsed microwave/ Ultra High Frequency (UHF)/ Very High
Frequency
(VHF) transmissions, allowing for targeting the unique brain patterns of
individuals and
projecting subliminal messages, or even actual voices which others cannot hear,
directly into the
brain.
I also show that remote neuroimaging technology and subvocalization recognition are
possible,
and that users of such technology are able to home in on a particular human brain,
or a larger
Available at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20131009204851/http://www.raven1.net/silsoun2.htm.
See release RELIABLE NEURAL-INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY (RE-NET), available at:
http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/MTO/Programs/Reliable_Neural-
Interface_Technology_(RE-NET).aspx.
215
216

Page
111
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

group of brains.
Research in the Petition also shows how that the brain waves of normal thought
patterns can be
disrupted remotely using microwaves, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and many
other
electromagnetic technologies.
25.2 A Call for International Oversight
In this context, is time for an urgent review by the U.S. Senate /House Select
Committees on
Intelligence on the development, deployment and funding of psychotronic weapons in
the United
States and abroad, as well as a review of my specific case of electronic torture
lodged before
the Organization of American States (OAS) Human Rights Commission.
A serious and in-depth investigation is needed of the psychotronic weapons
capabilities of
nation states, and a global ban on such weapons should be a high priority for
multilateral
organizations such as the European Parliament, the United Nations (UN), the
Organizations of
American States (OAS) and other bodies.
In my Petition, I point out that, in January 1999, the EU Parliament passed a
Resolution on
psychotronic weapons, calling for “an international convention introducing a global
ban on all
developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation
of
human beings.”
Now, I call on the EU Parliament to resume study of this vital issue, where
technological
innovation in neuroscience is clashing with human rights interests, and to loudly
and urgently
present its results to the United Nations.
And again, the Asian Human Rights Commission, publisher of the magazine Torture-
Asian and
Global Perspectives, in 2013 raised the alarm over the development and use of
psychotronic
weapons, stating: “The threat is real….some say such technologies have been used
systematically against select people in various jurisdictions…”
It is also time to pay close attention to the statement from former National
Security Agency
Contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden, who said in his 2013 Christmas
address:
“A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all. They'll
never know what it
means to have a private moment to themselves -- an unrecorded, unanalyzed thought.”

The U.S. Congress should not forget past wrongdoing in the form of non-consensual
mind
control experiments conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) through
Project
MkUltra, exposed by the Church Committee in the 1970s, where decades of non-
consensual
abuse and torture were unveiled.
Because now, there is a new MkUltra project underway, and many experts say that
MkUltra
research was never halted – that the U.S. mind control research program was simply
moved
Page
112
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

into a new array of “black” projects and experiments.

The research presented in my Petition irrefutably demonstrates that it is at least
plausible that
such “neuroweapons” exist and are being used to monitor the American people, in
violation, at
the very least, of the 4th, 5th and 8th Amendments to the Constitution on search
and seizure,
self-incrimination and torture, respectively, not to mention brazen violations of
the rights
enshrined in international human rights treaties.
This “Voice of God” technology has been reported as being used by U.S. military
forces in Iraq
War I and II, and there have been waves of complaints by “Targeted Individuals” in
the U.S. and
around the globe who claim this technology is being used to punish, torture and
experiment on
them.
25.3 Woodward Holds Back on “Amazing” New Technology
As related in the Petition, even famed reporter and Associate Editor of the
Washington Post Bob
Woodward attributed a decline in violence during the 2007 “Surge” in Iraq to a
“new” and secret
weapons system, the development of which Woodward says was tantamount to the
Manhattan
Project, which as of early 2014 has yet to be revealed.
Alluding to this stunning technological advance on 60 Minutes, Woodward said:
“This is very sensitive and very top secret, but there are secret operational
capabilities that have
developed by the military to locate, target and kill leaders of Al Qaeda in Iraq
insurgent leaders,
renegade militia leaders, which is one of the true breakthroughs.”

Woodward added:
“It’s one of those things…go back to any war, World War I, World War II, with the
role of the tank
and the airplane, it’s the stuff of what military novels are written.” 217

It is my thesis that the weapons system Woodward refers to includes aspects of the
psychotronic weaponry capabilities as described in my Petition to the Inter-
American Human
Rights Commission.
It is also likely that this weapons system includes satellite-based remote
neuroimaging in
combination with advanced algorithms that allow for identifying terrorist brain
patterns.218
I strongly encourage Woodward to come forward with more details of the “new
techniques and
operations” to which he refers if he wants any chance of removing the stain on his
character of
60 Minutes interview of Bob Woodward available at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/woodwardmilitary-brass-opposed-surge/.
218
Doug Pasternak,“John Norseen, Reading Your Mind and Injecting Smart Thoughts,”
Newsweek, Jan.
3, 2000, archive available at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010815122646/http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/Norseen
.htm.
217

Page
113
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

having been intimidated by a four-star U.S. military general into remaining silent
on the top
secret weaponry he describes, which he has said would “amaze” the public upon its
disclosure.
Woodward reported on the relatively minor crime story of Watergate and earned fame
and
riches, but passed on one of the biggest story of all time – the use of “mind
reading” weapons in
wartime.
Due to Woodward’s neglect, countless thousands have needlessly suffered under
nonconsensual government experimentation programs, and growing numbers will
continue to suffer
as these weapons are now turned against Americans and segments of the global
population.219
25.4 A Very Brief History of Mind Control in America
It is notable that neuroscience research into how to control the human brain in
America has its
legacy in Nazi scientists who came to the United States following World War II.
Some 2,000 German “propulsion” and “mind” scientists entered the U.S. under
Operation
Paperclip, organized by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), for recruiting the
best of German
scientists, who were given new backgrounds in order to enter the United States
without
restriction.220
Interest in mind sciences intensified during the Korean War, where many American
POWs were
subjected to brainwashing by the Koreans and the Chinese.
The CIA, the successor agency to the OSS, in the 1950s spent billions financing
psychology
and psychiatry departments of major U.S. universities in what came to become known
as the
MkUltra program.
A significant event in research into psychotronic weaponry was the bombardment of
the U.S.
Embassy in Moscow with low-level microwaves during the Cold War.
This so-called “Moscow Signal” targeted the U.S. Embassy from 1953 to 1976, and
sparked a
flurry of research into microwaves and their effect on the human body as the U.S.
tried to
determine the purpose and the effects of the signal under Project Pandora.221
25.5 Our Entire Bodies are SIGINT
Today, microwave/ UHF or VHF signals can be transmitted in any number of ways: via
satellite,
via cellular telephone towers, microwave transmitters or embedded in television or
radio
broadcast signals.
So-called GWEN towers, which are microwave towers built in the U.S. during the Cold
War to
Interview of Bob Woodward discussing a new top-secret weapons system, which Victim
states could
only be a psychotronic weapons system, with Andrea Mitchell, available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLhOUFYjTDM.
220
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip.
221
Available at: http://jenniferlake.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/the-moscow-signal/.
219

Page
114
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

preserve communications during a nuclear strike, could also be used to transmit

“Voice to Skull”
technology.
There is overwhelming evidence that other such technologies exist and, in fact, are
being used
to carry out experimentation, perhaps leading to routine, non-democratic targeting
of individuals,
sectors of the population and the population as a whole, which would be a gross
violation of the
human rights of every human being on Earth.
Do you really want the U.S. intelligence structure to know your deepest secret
thoughts? Those
of your children and grandchildren, and their children?
The Brain Invaders segment on former governor Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory
says that
this so-called "mind control" technology has been used against Occupy and huge
numbers of
U.S. citizens by the Obama administration.
And it has been used against me, too.
25.6 Remote Sensing Via Radiotelescope
It is also my theory that this system relies on "remote sensing” performed by radio
telescopes in
the U.S. reconnaissance satellite system, or even ground-based radio telescope
arrays.
When linked in an “array” of multiple radio telescopes (which I theorize has been
done with the
U.S. spy satellite system), the size of the receiving “dish” is equal to the
surface area covered
by the different component antennas of the array.
Thus, a number of satellites can be used to form a single, incredibly sensitive,
enormous radio
antenna, able to detect, from space, even the electromagnetic signals giving off by
living beings
on Earth, including the emissions of the human brain.
The surface area of the earth is about 200 million square miles. U.S. spy
satellites orbit at
25,000 miles above the Earth. Thus, we have the most sensitive radio antenna "dish"
ever
invented, a spherical “dish” of roughly 13 billion square miles, orbiting above us
at all times,
pointing down at Earth and able to easily pick up ALL of Earth’s electromagnetic
signals, which
are then filtered, recorded, vetted by NSA and DARPA algorithms.222
And this technology is being used against humans.
I think that is what Edward Snowden meant when he said in his Christmas message
that a child
born today would never know what is it like to have a “private moment to
themselves…an
Example of a practical application of DARPA mind research in September 18, 2012
news release,
available at: Tag Team Threat Recognitional Technology Incorporates Mind, Machine,
available at:
http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/09/18.aspx. See also Detection and
Computational
Analysis of Psychological Signals
http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/I2O/Programs/Detection_and_Computational_Analysis_of_
Psychological
_Signals_(DCAPS).aspx.
222

Page
115
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

unrecorded thought.”
Factor this in with the fact that, during the 1950s through the 1970s, there were
thousands of
innocent victims of the MkUltra CIA mind control program.
The consensus among experts is that the MkUltra project never really stopped – it
continued
under different project names.
25.7 Targeted Individuals: High Tech Political Prisoners
Due to the specter of non-democratic targeting of individuals, sectors of the
population or the
population as a whole, I consider it to be my obligation to challenge the tyranny
of the Obama
administration in this matter, and I am unwilling be intimidated by the threats of
death, torture
and arrest made by Obama´s secret agents against me and my family, as well as the
threats to
defame me in any number of ways if I disclose this information.
So-called Targeted Individuals are often those seen as being a threat to the
government, and
lose their freedom not necessarily through imprisonment, but rather are taken as
mental
prisoners of the Obama administration, or any future administration, without trial
or sentencing,
able to be tortured at will by PSY-OPS officers making use of the ultimate secret
weapon of
mass destruction – the psychogenic weapon which wirelessly communicates and
terrorizes its
victims through “synthetic telepathy,” leaving no outward proof or evidence of the
horrific
damage electronic stalking can do to the psyche.
After more than 17 months and still counting, my torture continues, and PSY-OPS
officers issue
constant threats to "prosecute me for everything I have ever done for the rest of
my short life,”
though my life has been relatively honorable and honest.
Meanwhile, I am persecuted by the Obama NSA Gestapo´s real-life “thought police,”
solely
because I am an innocent civilian with knowledge of possibly damaging information
about the
Presidency.
If any good has come from my mental torture by the Obama administration, it has
been the
opportunity for me to practice civil disobedience to advance what I see to be the
most important
human rights cause of our time – freedom from electromagnetic tyranny in all and
any of its
forms.
So far, I have been fighting my battle against the psychotronic weaponry of the
Obama
administration using the Internet.
I am trying to fuel outrage over an unrelenting attack on our civil liberties and
human rights, and
I have written this book to relate my eyewitness account of the corruption and
wrongdoing of the
Administration.

Page
116
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

I am also preparing a lawsuit to be filed before a Mexican labor board, claiming

unpaid wages
and damages from the United States Embassy for salaries that were never disbursed
during the
period while the Obama administration has tortured me.
And as I have stated, it is my intent to seek asylum in a European nation as a
torture victim.
As far as I know, I am the sole civilian eyewitness of Obama's possible organized
crime ties.
And if I had not survived being repeatedly incited to suicide by Obama's agents, I
would not be
here to tell this story.
I´m just waiting to see what the Obama administration will do to me next.

Page
117
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

26. Copy of Police Report Against CIA in Mexico

Page
118
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

27. E-Mail to John Nagel from U.S. Federal Election Commission

Jan. 23, 2014
Good afternoon, my name is Ruth Heilizer and I am an attorney in the Federal
Election
Commission's ("Commission's" or "FEC's") Office of Complaints Examination and Legal
Administration. I am responding to your email.
The Commission has jurisdiction over the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as
amended (the "Act") and Chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26, United States Code. The
Commission's responsibilities including disclosing campaign finance information,
enforcing the
provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions,
overseeing the public
funding of Presidential elections. See http://www.fec.gov/about.shtml. After
careful review of
your email and link concerning your Organization of American States Human Rights
Petition, we
have determined that they does not state any acts that appear to constitute a
violation under our
jurisdiction.
In addition, the Act and Commission regulations require that complaints meet
certain
specific requirements, including that they be in writing, signed and notarized.
Therefore, we
cannot accept emailed complaints.
The statutory and regulatory requirements for filing a complaint are as follows:
(1)
A complaint must be in writing. (2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1)). As noted supra, emails
are not acceptable. In addition, the complaint's contents must be sworn to and
signed in the
presence of a notary public and shall be notarized. (2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1)). The
notary must
indicate as part of the jurat that such swearing occurred. The preferred form is
"Subscribed and
sworn to before me on this ___ day of ___, ____."
(2)
A formal complaint should contain a clear and concise recitation of the facts
describing a violation of the Act, and/or a Commission regulation or regulations,
over which the
Commission has jurisdiction (11 C.F.R. § 111.4).
(3)
A formal complaint should be accompanied by supporting documentation if known
and available to the person making the complaint. (11 C.F.R. § 111.4).
(4)
A formal complaint must contain the full name and address of the person making
the complaint. (11 C.F.R. § 111.4).
(5)
A formal complaint should clearly identify as a respondent each person or entity
who is alleged to have committed a violation. (11

Page
119
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

28. An Open Letter to Senate Intelligence Committee on Psychotronic Weaponry

January 31, 2014
Senator Diane Feinstein
Senator Saxby Chambliss
U.S. Senate Select Permanent Committee on Intelligence
Dear Senators Feinstein and Chambliss:
Hello. My name is John Nagel and I am an American citizen. But for the reasons I
give below, I
will never return to the United States of America.
Before I tell my story, I urge you to take action by holding Congressional hearings
on the subject
of the “Targeted Individuals phenomenon” in the United States and abroad,223 as
well as on my
specific case of electronic torture, details of which appear in the attached
Petition filed before
the Organization of American States (OAS) Human Rights Commission.
While so-called psychotronic weapons once belonged to the realm of science fiction,
stunning
advances in neuroscience and remote brain scans have led to amazing new
capabilities.224
Because now, science can peer into the human brain using remote sensing technology
and can
literally “read your mind” using so-called functional EEGs, MRIs and other scanning
technology
which has been perfected by the U.S. military, with the private sector quickly
catching up.225
This process, carried out through remote brain scanning on a massive scale, is
known as
“subvocalization recognition,” and there have already been patents filed and
awarded for
advances in this technology, most recently by Motorola Mobility (a subsidiary of
Google Inc
which Google on Jan. 30, 2014 said it would sell to Lenovo).226
28.1 Psychotronic Weapons in Iraq War I and II
Another technology affecting the mind, developed by the U.S. Army, is “Voice of
God” or “Voice
to Skull” pulsed microwave/ Ultra High Frequency (UHF)/Very High Frequency (VHF)

For more on Targeted Individuals see Jesse Ventura, “Brain Invaders,” Conspiracy
Theory television
show, segment available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afaHkmyy5so.
224
For more on functional neuroimaging, see this 2008 segment, Lesley Stahl, “Mind
Reading,” 60
Minutes, available at: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?
id=5119805nhttp://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5119805n.
225
Ibid.
226
Article on Google Inc. announcement of sale of Motorola Mobility to Lenovo
available at:
http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/29/technology/mobile/motorola-lenovo/.
223

Page
120
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

transmission,227 which allows for targeting specific brains of individuals and

projecting either
subliminal messages or even actual voices which others cannot hear directly into
the brain.228
Brain waves of normal thinking can be disrupted remotely, as evidenced in the
following
shocking video from BBC Four Video, which also may show what could be an effort to
manipulate or intimidate U.S. media by making reporters garble their words on the
air:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLo43d4JhTU. CNN’s Anderson Cooper also suffered
such
an apparent episode.229
This “Voice of God” technology was reportedly used by U.S. military forces in Iraq
War I and II.
Even Washington Post Associate Editor and author Bob Woodward attributed a decline
in
violence during the “Surge” in Iraq to a “new” and top-secret weapons system, the
development
of which has been tantamount to the Manhattan Project, the features of which
directly
correspond to psychotronic weapons.230
In January 1999, the EU Parliament passed a Resolution on “Mind Control” Weaponry,
calling
for “an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and
deployments
of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings.”231
A 2013 interim report on the President’s BRAIN (Brain Research and Innovation in
Neuroscience) Initiative said, "directly activating and inhibiting populations of
neurons,
neuroscience is progressing from observation to causation, and much more is
possible…"232
Subsequently, the Asian Human Rights Commission, publisher of Torture Magazine
raised alarm
over President Obama’s BRAIN Initiative (Brain Research and Innovation in
Neuroscience), and
in 2013 it denounced the development and use of psychotronic weapons.233

227

Description of Voice of God, Sharon Weinberger, “The Voice of God Weapon

Returns,” Wired Magazine, 21 December 1, 2007, available at
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/12/the-voice-of-go/. See also Steve
Corman, “PSYOPS Tech: Voices in your head,” 20 December, 2007, available at:
http://csc.asu.edu/2007/12/20/psyops-tech-voices-in-your-head/.
228

Ibid.

Anderson Cooper suffering a possible attack using transcranial magnetic stimulation

or a similar
technology: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA1pKMtb9tk.
230
Video of Bob Woodward discussing a new top-secret weapons system, which Victim
states could
only be a psychotronic weapons system, in an interview with Andrea Mitchell,
available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLhOUFYjTDM. Video of Woodward on 60 Minutes:
http://futureblogger.net/futureblogger/show/860-bob-woodward-u-s-has-deployed-
revolutionary-secrettech-in-iraq-and-it-s-working.
231
European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from
January 28,
1999, point 27, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?
PRG=CALDOC&FILE=990128&LANGUE=EN&TPV=DEF&LASTCHAP=1&SDOCTA=8&TXTLST=1&Type_Do
c=RESOL&POS=1.
232
Interim report on the Obama BRAIN Initiative is available at:
http://www.nih.gov/science/brain/09162013-Interim%20Report_Final%20Composite.pdf.
233
See September 27, 2013 statement from the Asian Human Rights Commission on
neuroweapons,
available at: http://www.humanrights.asia/news/ahrc-news/AHRC-STM-174-2013.
229

Page
121
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

Alluding to this report, the Asian Human Rights Commission continued:

“The threat is real. The NIH Interim Report is another of many indications that
brain technology for
neuroweapons is scientifically possible. Additionally, some say such technologies
have been used
systematically against select people in various jurisdictions… definitions on
certain procedures and
practices have to be revisited due to the many legal loopholes that allow for real
criminals to
commit illegal activities.”234

It is in this context of Orwellian surveillance that my OAS Human Rights Petition

was made,
regarding the use of electronic torture against me while living in Mexico and
travelling through
OAS member States.
This torture has not stopped since September of 2012, and the outcome for me has
been a
high-tech remote monitoring melodrama, as can be seen in the Petition below.
28.2 Echoes of Snowden, Assange
In my case, I note that my torture has taken place in a context in which the
President of the
European Parliament, Martin Schulz, has said that U.S. secret services are “out of
control,” and
it is now well known that the U.S., with the knowledge of President Obama, has
engaged in
spying on a massive level, including against allies Italy, France, Germany, Brazil,
Spain and
Mexico, in collusion with the Five Eyes states.235
I highlight the statement from former National Security Agency Contractor and
whistleblower
Edward Snowden, who said in his 2013 Christmas address:
“A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all. They'll
never know what it
means to have a private moment to themselves -- an unrecorded, unanalyzed
thought.”236

Snowden also has also stated that in an interview that he fears for his life due to
threats from
the United States Government; Victim states that he, too, fears for his life due to
the many
threats made against him.
Alluding to Snowden, Time.com said:
“The whistleblower, who has been granted asylum in Russia, cited reports of
anonymous U.S.
officials wishing him harm. ‘These people, and they are government officials, have
said they would
love to put a bullet in my head or poison me when I come out of the supermarket and
then watch
me die in the shower,’ Snowden said.”237
Ibid.
Available at: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101142910.
236
Edward Snowden statement available at:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1aefb0_snowdeninterview-in-english_news.
237
Ibid.
234
235

Page
122
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

Senators, please do not forget the past abuses in the form of non-consensual mind
control
experiments by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the form of Project
MKULTRA, exposed
by the Church Committee in the 1970s.238
The Church Committee unveiled 20 years of abuse in a series of non-scientific mind
control
experimentation projects using, for example, LSD, sleep deprivation and other forms
of torture.
Senators, I can assure you that this weaponry exists and is being used to monitor
the American
people in violation, at the very least, of the 4th, 5th and 8th Amendments to the
Constitution.
I know, because I cut my own throat in protest of the use of this weaponry against
me.
28.3 Microwave, UHF or VHF? Our Entire Bodies are SIGINT
Microwave/ UHF or VHF signals can be transmitted and detected in any number of
ways: via
satellite, via cellular telephone towers, microwave transmitters or embedded in
television or
radio broadcast signals.
So-called GWEN towers, which are microwave towers built in the U.S. during the Cold
War to
preserve communications during a nuclear strike, could also be used to transmit so-
called
“Voice to Skull” technology, Dr. Robert Duncan, a former CIA contractor has stated.
My research provides overwhelming evidence that such technologies exist and, in
fact, are
being used to carry out experimentation, perhaps leading to routine, non-democratic
targeting of
individuals, sectors of the population and the population as a whole, which would
be a gross
violation of the human rights of every human being on Earth.
I urge a serious and in-depth investigation of the psychotronic weapons
capabilities of nation
states, and I assert that a global ban on such weapons should be a high priority
for multilateral
organizations such as the European Parliament, the United Nations (UN), the
Organizations of
American States (OAS) and other bodies.
I urge you to read my OAS Petition, if not for me, then to help protect the human
rights of our
generation and future generations.
I assure you, no one is immune from this technology.

Sincerely,
John M. Nagel

238

Church Committee report available at:

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/13inmate_ProjectMKULTRA.pdf.
Page
123
OAS HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION - JOHN M. NAGEL VS. U.S.A.

Page
124