Professional Documents
Culture Documents
According to McNair (2002), there has been a drastic growth in the demand for and
consumption of pornography in the U.S. from 1970 to the early 21st century. The annual
turnover of the porno industry in 1972 is estimated to be around 10 million dollars.
The corresponding figure for 1996 is 8 billion. In 1996, 8,000 new porno films were
released and distributed to 25,000 video stores across the U.S. The Internet has added
to the great circulation of and dramatic increase in pornographic material. A large pro-
portion of the time people spend on the Internet is dedicated to consumption of pornog-
raphy (Månsson et al., 2003).
Thomas Johansson, Centre for Cultural Studies, Göteborg University; Nils Hammarén, Centre for Cul-
tural Studies, Göteborg University.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Thomas Johansson, Centre for Cultural
Studies, Göteborg University, Box 200, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. Electronic mail: thomas.johansson@kul-
tur.gu.se or nils.hammaren@socwork.gu.se
The Journal of Men’s Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, Winter 2007, 57–70.
© 2007 by the Men’s Studies Press, LLC. http://www.mensstudies.com. All rights reserved.
jms.1501.57/$10.00 DOI: 10.3149/jms.1501.57
57
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
Method
58
HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
scribed in a number of works; see, for example, Hammarén and Johansson (2001,
2002), Johansson and Lalander (2003) as well as Johansson (2005). The study is based
on a questionnaire containing 138 questions. The questions deal with home and family
conditions, social background, contentment with school/life, self-image, views on one’s
own body, sexual habits, attitudes, what one thinks about other young people’s sexual
experiences, and a battery of questions concerning crime and punishment. The primary
focus is on questions concerning sexual morals, self-image, gender and attitudes. Em-
phasis on the preventative and medical aspects of young people’s sexuality is relatively
common in other, similar studies, which is why we have chosen to focus in particular
on cultural and social dimensions.
Because all students present in each class completed the survey (100% response
rate), any attrition is due to students not in class that day. At least one person in each
class was ill, skipping class, engaged in other school-related activities, e.g., drama prac-
tice, or working in a special instruction group. Because participation was voluntary,
some also declined. If all “dropouts” are counted, then an average of 80 percent of the
students in the classes we visited completed the survey. This response rate must be
viewed as relatively good. A total of 1,331 young people participated in the survey
study. Sixty-three percent came from schools in Gothenburg and 37 percent from
schools in Kalmar. Forty-eight percent are young men and 52% young women. Fifty-
one percent were attending ninth grade and 49 percent were in their third year of high
school (twelfth grade). Levels of significance are reported in the tables. Chi-2 values
indicate possible relationships between different variables.
Results
Youth is marked in many respects by a search for identity and belonging (Ziehe,
1989). Studies indicate that today’s young people show several signs of having more
open attitudes toward sexuality than was the case only a decade ago. “One-night stands”
have become more common, young people have more sexual partners then they did
before and are younger when they have their first sexual encounter. They are also more
tolerant with regard to homo- and bisexuality (Herlitz, 2001). However, according to
some studies, the romantic love ideology—that is, the view that love legitimizes sex—
has a strong position in young people’s sexual lives (Forsberg, 2000; Frisell, 1996;
Helmius, 1990). This ideology of “good” sexuality is not easily translated into everyday
reality, however. For young people, everyday reality constitutes a kind of field of ten-
sion containing different factions and nuances, where more repressive and restrictive
sexual morals represent one extreme pole, and liberal open-mindedness, the other. One
area in which more “traditional” patterns are found is the world of pornography. The
typical consumer here is a young or middle-age man. Just as interesting as finding these
typical overall patterns is looking more closely at the nuances and shadings in them. In
the following section, we use our data to show both the general and the more specific.
59
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
Table 1
“Have you ever read a porno magazine?”
No Yes
Table 2
“Have you ever watched a porno film?” Responses Presented as a Function of School
Level and Sex
No Yes
Junior High
Young men (n = 329) 8.5% 91.5%
Young women (n = 312) 42.6% 57.4%
High School
Young men (n = 280) 6.4% 93.6%
Young women (n = 345) 26.4% 73.6%
Note: p-value within the category young men: p < 0.333; p-value within the category young
women: p < 0.000
60
HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
Table 3
“Pornography is sexually exciting.”
1 2 3 4 5
Note: p < 0.000. 1 = Agrees completely; 2 = Agrees fairly well; 3 = Agrees to some degree;
4 = Agrees rather poorly; 5 = Doesn’t agree at all.
Young men and young women are approaching one another in many respects,
while other areas are still marked by strong tendencies toward maintaining a traditional
gender balance. Attitudes toward pornography and homosexuality remain largely di-
vided along gender lines, but we are also able to observe how young men’s and young
women’s lines of reasoning overlap. Today, young women are more likely to consume
pornography and a relatively large proportion of them report becoming sexually aroused
by it. However, young women are also the primary critics of pornography, although
even the majority of young men feel it is degrading in some respects.
A surprisingly large proportion of young men have positive attitudes toward
pornography. But if we look more closely at the distribution of answers, we see that one
fourth of the young men take exception to pornography. Using in-depth studies it would
be possible to obtain more information on how individuals who have positive versus
negative attitudes formulate their viewpoints. Some cases might reveal young men’s ac-
tive resistance to the degradation of women, while other cases might involve young
men who think it is “cool” to like pornography. There is no uniform “young man” here,
but instead a scale in which different men manifest and stand for different types of
masculinity (Connell, 2000).
If we study the first two tables (4 and 5) below, we can imagine a division into
three different positions. Using additional methods, we could probably refine this analy-
sis, bringing out more nuances. But for now, let us view this as the beginning of a more
in-depth analysis of the data. The following three groups are found among the young
people in our study:
Porno enthusiasts. This group has positive attitudes toward pornography and does not
feel that it is degrading or that it should be censored or forbidden. We assume that more
in-depth studies of this relatively large group of young men and relatively small group
of young women would reveal nuances and different views on pornography. It is also
highly likely that the young women who have positive attitudes toward pornography
differ markedly from other young women.
The ambivalent. A rather large group—more young men than young women—partly
agrees with the notion that pornography is degrading. This indicates a certain degree
61
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
of ambivalence. Similarly, a rather large group—again more young men than young
women—may be found in the category “fairly positive toward pornography.”
Porno opponents. A large proportion of the young women in our study are opposed to
pornography, feel it is degrading and believe that these kinds of pictures and films
should be forbidden. Note, in this connection, that 37 percent of the young men feel that
pornography is degrading.
Table 4
“What is your attitude toward pornography?”
1 2 3 4 5
Note: p < 0.000. 1 = Very positive; 2 = Positive; 3 = Fairly positive; 4 = Fairly negative; 5 = Very
negative.
Table 5
“Pornography is degrading.”
1 2 3 4 5
Note: p < 0.000. 1 = Agrees completely; 2 = Agrees fairly well; 3 = Agrees to some degree;
4 = Agrees rather poorly; 5 = Doesn’t agree at all.
There is every reason to continue and to deepen and nuance the picture of how
young people think about and relate to pornography. Underlying the figures presented
here is a much more complex situation. We will return to the question of how we should
observe and think about today’s young masculinity. Is it possible that we too easily
dismiss young men as porno consumers and male chauvinists?
Table 6 shows that young people generally have basically liberal attitudes toward
media content and people’s right to consume it. Although attitudes toward pornography
are otherwise strikingly variable, there is no appreciable difference between how young
men and young women relate to the right to view pornographic material. Even if there
may be a significant difference, the percentage differences in the responses are not
great. Most young people, regardless of sex, consider that everyone should have the
same right to view pornography. Every individual should be able to choose what he or
she wishes to see or read. At the same time, however, there are great gender differences
in preferences for different types of media content.
62
HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
Table 6
“Girls have as much right to watch pornography as boys do.”
1 2 3 4 5
Note: p < 0.013. 1 = Agrees completely; 2 = Agrees fairly well; 3 = Agrees to some degree;
4 = Agrees rather poorly; 5 = Doesn’t agree at all.
Table 7
“Do you become sexually excited when you read erotic stories?”
1 2 3 4
Note: p < 0.012. 1 = Very excited; 2 = Rather excited; 3 = Not particularly excited; 4 = Not at
all excited.
Table 8
“Do you become sexually excited when you watch porno films?”
1 2 3 4
Note: p < 0.000. 1 = Very excited; 2 = Rather excited; 3 = Not particularly excited; 4 = Not at
all excited.
63
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
Table 9
“Are you ashamed of watching porno films?”
1 2 3 4 5
Note: p < 0.000. 1 = Yes, always; 2 = Yes, often; 3 = Sometimes; 4 = Seldom; 5 = Never.
Studies show that young women experience doubtfulness and ambivalence about
manifestations of pornography and its effect on their own desires. Sociologist Lena
Berg (1999), for instance, sees certain duplicity in young heterosexual women’s atti-
tudes toward pornography: some find it sexually arousing, while others experience a
feeling of discomfort. Berg considers that young women have learned to dislike pornog-
raphy, but despite this find it difficult to check the various effects such content may
have on them.
Another discussion that recurs regularly is that of the possible effects of pornog-
raphy on young people’s sexual habits and attitudes. Contemporary discussions often
express a concern that pornography functions as a norm-setter, thereby affecting young
people’s sexual expression. The main concern here is the question of whether men, in-
spired by pornography, force women to have anal sex. In a recently published study of
300 young men (16-25 years of age), supported by the Swedish Organization for Sexual
Education clinic in Stockholm, those who had engaged in anal sex (57%) were asked
to state, among other things, who had taken the initiative to their latest anal sex en-
counter. The data show that the young men themselves had taken the initiative in 40
percent of the cases and their partner in 33 percent of the cases. The remaining re-
sponses were “don’t know” or “both took the initiative” (Rogala & Tydén, 2001). Stud-
ies have shown that consumers of pornography are more likely to have experienced
anal and oral sex than are people who have not consumed such material (Häggström-
Nordin, 2005, Rogala & Tydén, 1999).
In the discussion on pornography, one question has been whether it is pornography
per se that has given rise to certain sexual practices. Some claim that this is the case,
while others see consumption of pornography as part of a broader sexual repertoire
that also includes anal and oral sex. In our data, 59 percent of the young men and 64
percent of the young women have had oral sex. Fifteen percent of both young men and
young women have had anal sex. Of those who have not had anal sex, 38 percent of the
young men and 8 percent of the young women could imagine having anal sex. More-
over, 11 percent of the young men and 2 percent of the young women have had group
sex. Of those who have not had group sex, 54 percent of the young men and 21 percent
of the young women could imagine having group sex. It is difficult to say whether
these different practices have increased among young people during the past few years.
With regard to group sex, such behavior seems instead to have decreased. Anal and
64
HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
oral sex, on the other hand, seem to have increased. However, when comparing our re-
sults with those from other studies, we must take into account the different procedures
and selection processes used (see, for example, Forsberg, 2000, who presents and dis-
cusses the outcomes of different investigations.)
One common opinion is that it is not pornography per se that causes a given be-
havior, but instead that pornography represents habits that already exist, puts its own
spin on them and causes them to appear to be commonly occurring. If such is the case,
is it possible to say that pornography is the direct cause of certain sexual practices?
No, such a claim is difficult to make, however we can see that certain behaviors are
more likely to occur among people who have seen a porno film than among people
who have not. This is also shown in our data.
Table 10
Proportion of Young Men and Women Who Have Watched (or Not Watched) a Porno
Film and Who Have Had Sexual Intercourse
Note: p-value within the category young men: p < 0.000; p-value within the category young
women: p < 0.000
Table 11
Proportion of Young men and Women Who Have Watched (or Not Watched) a Porno
Film and Who Have Had Oral Sex.
Note: p-value within the category young men: p < 0.000; p-value within the category young
women: p < 0.000
65
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
Table 12
Proportion of Young men and Women Who Have Watched (or Not Watched) a Porno
Film and Who Have Had Anal Sex
Note: p-value within the category young men: p < 0.043; p-value within the category young
women: p < 0.000
We see in the tables above that there are obvious associations between having
watched a porno film and having engaged in certain sexual practices. However, we
may only speculate as to what has caused one behavior or the other. The concepts of
anal sex and oral sex are, moreover, relatively general, and it is therefore difficult to
know how the young people have interpreted them. In this case, we do know how the
young people interpreted the word “sex” or whether they have been “active” or “pas-
sive” in their performance of these practices.
Our study shows several connections between consumption of pornography and
attitudes and sexual habits. The data reveal that pornography consumers are more likely
to have had sexual intercourse, masturbated, to have experienced same-sex sex, a one-
night stand, etc., than are those who have not watched a porno film. Moreover, those
who have watched a porno film are more likely to report being satisfied with their body,
thinking they are sexy/good looking, being less ashamed of masturbation, thinking sex
without love is “okay,” and thinking that prostitution/pornography, etc., is “okay.”
There are many relationships here, and the example of sexual intercourse may be more
indicative of age than of sexual experience. Thus, claiming that pornography alone in-
fluences the entirety of an individual’s sexual expression probably constitutes ascribing
pornography too much power. It is perhaps more reasonable to claim that pornography
is part of a larger sexual space and sexual experimentation that also include anal sex,
oral sex, and a more fully expressed sexuality.
Discussion
To begin with, we may state that young men clearly have more positive attitudes
toward pornography than do young women. Many scholars have sought an explanation
for young men’s consumption of pornography in male rituals, homosociality and in the
social construction of hegemonic masculinity. At the same time, however, this solid
core of male identity is beginning to crumble, change, and take on new forms. Today
we see, among men, considerable resistance to various traditional male behaviors and
rituals (Frosh et al., 2002; Johansson, 2005; O’Donnell & Sharpe, 2000).
66
HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
It is surprising, in one respect, that so many of the young men in our study are rel-
atively positive toward pornography, that they feel relatively little shame and that they
do not take exception to pornography on the grounds that is it degrading to women.
However, this pattern of attitudes should be understood in light of this particular age
group’s problematic relationship to its “masculinity.” There is considerable support for
the notion that young men are highly homophobic and that they even display a number
of sexist attitudes and behaviors. In one Swedish study, Bäckman (2003) shows that
young men find it difficult to learn from sexual education. These young men find it
difficult to find the words to talk about and approach homosexuality and their own am-
bivalent “masculinity.”
Although a large proportion of young men have positive attitudes toward pornog-
raphy, a considerable number are also actively opposed to it. We feel there is a need for
research that looks more closely at the distribution of young men whom we have called
porno enthusiasts and that looks at the variation in viewpoints within this certainly het-
erogeneous group. Furthermore, it would seem worthwhile to study the large group of
young men who oppose pornography. Who are they? How are they different from the
group of porno enthusiasts? Finally, there is a group of young men who are ambivalent.
They do not seem to have decided what they think. The group of young women who
consume pornography and who express positive attitudes toward it also need to be stud-
ied. One common conception is that these young women are insecure and are practically
forced to watch porno films by their boyfriends. But is this actually the case? Do we
see a tendency here toward portraying young women as victims?
The phenomenon of pornography has always been controversial. In Sweden, it is
often thought to be degrading to women. This negative attitude is also clearly present
in the responses to our survey study. As a rule, young women have very negative atti-
tudes toward pornography. On the other hand, there is great variation in how young men
relate to the sex industry. Moreover, many young people are ambivalent. At the same
time as many people take exception to pornographic images of sexuality and gender,
we also live in a society marked by a liberal ideology. The notion that people should
be able to choose to consume pornography if they wish is strong. We see this clearly
among the young people in our study. In a society in which different forces and different
conceptions of pornography often collide, it is difficult for the individual to form his/her
own opinion. Young people must make their own way among porno feminists, liberals,
radical feminists, conservatives, and a number of other opinion groups.
References
67
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
Berg, L. (1999). Just enough. Young girl’s views on sexuality and pornography (Lagom
är bäst. Unga tjejers syn på sexualitet och pornografi). Uppsala University. De-
partment of Sociology.
Centervall, E. (1995). Love hurts! You see. Conversations about sexuality and sex ed-
ucation in school (Kärlek känns! Förstår du. Samtal om sexualitet och samlevnad
i skolan). Stockholm: Liber.
Connell, R. W. (2000). The men and the boys. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crosson, C. (1998). The conservative struggle against pornography (Den reaktionära
kampen mot pornografin). Arbetaren, 1.
Dworkin, A. (1991). The pornography-war against women. In Pornography—Reality
or fantasy? (Pornografi-Kriget mot kvinnor i Pornografi—verklighet eller fantasi?)
Stockholm: ROKS.
Dworkin, A. (1997). Life and death. New York: Free Press.
Ewen, S. (1988). All consuming images. The politics of style in contemporary culture.
New York: Basic Books.
Forsberg, M. (2000). Youth and sexuality – An overview 2000 (Ungdomar och sexualitet
– en kunskapsöversikt år 2000). Report 2000,15, Folkhälsoinstitutet.
Forsberg, M. (2005). Blondes and others. Youth and sexuality in multicultural Sweden
(Brunetter och Blondiner. Om ungdom och sexualitet i det mångkulturella Sve-
rige). Göteborg University. Department of Social Work.
Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality I: The will to know (Sexualitetens historia
I: Viljan att veta.) Stockholm: Gidlunds.
Frisell, A. (1996). Love without sex is OK,… but not sex without love. High school
girls’ thoughts on love and sexuality (Kärlek utan sex går an … men inte sex utan
kärlek. Om gymnasieflickors tankar kring kärlek och sexualitet). Stockholm:
Mångkulturellt centrum.
Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2002). Young masculinities. Understanding boys
in contemporary society. London: Palgrave.
Hammarén, N. (2003). Whores, players and the others. Young men and sexuality in
multicultural Sweden. In T. Johansson & P. Lalander (Eds.), The transformations
of sexuality. Political lesbians, young Christians and macho-culture (”Horor, play-
ers och de Andra. Killar och sexualitet i det nya Sverige” i Johansson, T., och La-
lander, P. (Eds.), Sexualitetens omvandlingar. Politisk lesbiskhet, unga kristna och
machokulturer (pp. 95-124). Göteborg: Daidalos.
Hammarén, N., & Johansson, T. (2001). Youth and sexuality in the shadowland. Report
I: Young and horny? Young people’s sexual narratives (Ungdom och sexualitet i
gränslandet. Delrapport I. Ung och kåt? Om ungdomars sexuella berättelser). Re-
port No 1. The Polytechnic of Skövde.
Hammarén, N., & Johansson, T. (2002). Gender order or disorder. Young people’s
sexual landscapes (Könsordning eller könsoordning? Ungdomens sexuella land-
skap). Göteborg University: Centre of Cultural Studies, report 2.
68
HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
Helmius, G. (1990). Ready for sex? The restrictive society and young people’s hetero-
sexual desires (Mogen för sex? Det sexuella restriktiviserande samhället och ung-
domars heterosexuella glädje). Uppsala University: Department of Sociology.
Henriksson, B., & Lundahl, P. (1993). Youth, sexuality and gender roles. (Ungdom,
sexualitet och könsroller). Report 1993:6, Göteborg University: Department of So-
cial Work.
Herlitz, C. (2001). The public opinion on HIV/AIDS – Knowledge, attitudes and behav-
iours. (Allmänheten och hiv/aids—kunskaper, attityder och beteenden 1989-2000).
Folkhälsoinstitutet.
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head.
Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: The Tufnell Press.
Håkansson, G. (1999). About pornography. (Om pornografi). Res Publica, 1.
Häggström-Nordin, E. (2005). World’s apart? Sexual behaviour, contraceptive use,
and pornography consumption among young women and men. (Doctoral disserta-
tion, Uppsala University).
Johansson, T. (1998). The sculptured body (Den skulpterade kroppen). Stockholm:
Carlssons förlag.
Johansson, T. (Ed.). (2005). The transformation of masculinity – Youth, sexuality, gen-
der and heteronormativity (Manlighetens omvandlingar - ungdom, sexualitet och
kön i heteronormativitetens gränstrakter). Göteborg: Daidalos.
Johansson, T., & Lalander, P. (Eds.). (2003). The transformations of sexuality. Political
lesbians, young Christians and macho-culture (Sexualitetens omvandlingar. Poli-
tisk lesbiskhet, unga kristna och machokulturer). Göteborg: Daidalos.
Kvarning, M. (1998). We are the new pornofeminists. (Vi är de nya porrfeministerna).
Aftonbladet, 8-26.
Lewin, B., & Helmius, G. (1983). Youth and sexuality. A sociological study on young
people’s sexual conceptions and experiences (Ungdom och sexualitet. En socio-
logisk studie av ungdomars sexuella föreställningar och erfarenheter). Uppsala
University: Department of Sociology.
Lewin, B. (Ed.). (1997). Sex in Sweden. Sexual lifestyles in Sweden 1996 (Sex i Sve-
rige. Om sexuallivet i Sverige 1996). Stockholm: Folkhälsoinstitutet.
McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture. Sex, media and the democratisation of desire.
New York: Routledge.
Månsson, S-A. (2003). Sex and love on the Internet (Kärlek och sex på Internet). Gö-
teborg University: Department of Social Work.
O’Donnell, M., & Sharpe, S. (2000). Uncertain masculinities. Youth, ethnicity and
class in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.
Rogala, C., & Tydén, T. (1999). Young women’s sexual habits (Unga kvinnors sexu-
alvanor). Folkhälsoinstitutet. Unpublished manuscript.
Rogala, C., & Tydén, T. (2001). Young men’s sexual habits (Unga mäns sexualvanor).
Folkhälsoinstitutet. Unpublished manuscript.
Strossen, N. (1995). Defending pornography. Free speech, sex, and the fight for
women´s rights. New York: Scribner.
69
JOHANSSON and HAMMARÉN
70