You are on page 1of 3

Sub

Occurrence

Detection
Severity
Assembly

RPN
Failure Local Causes
Description Function End Effects Current controls
Mode Effects
/ Process
Step
Machining Outside Incorrect Re work, re Does not fit 8 improper loading, tool wear, incorrect 7 Visual, 5 280
diameter to dimension inspection, at Customer machine setting, incorrect measurement (Arbitrarily Automatic gauging, (Arbitrarily
fit in cam (Over size) (added Assembly method, and Material Lot Change assigned?) Certificate of Analysis assigned?)
shaft failure costs)

Partial FMEA table / table 1 Bundling of Causes!


(What will I work on?)
Sources of data
External
Customer Returns data
Internal Process Yield issues
% Defective, Defects per Unit
Product Design related BODY OF KNOWLEDGE
E.g. Performance, reliability, etc. Similar sources of data from Process Control
comparable E.g. Out of Spec, Contamination
Process Design related Products and processes. Supplier caused
E.g. Opportunity for error E.g. Out of Spec, non conformance, etc.

Process Control
E.g. Out of Spec, Contamination
Known Industry failure
Customer caused DFMEA / PFMEA -Technical journals, publications,
E.g. damage, S/W error, etc. (Historical) -Conferences, etc.
Supplier caused Failure mode-Effects-
E.g. Out of Spec, Causes
non conformance, etc.
Customer Complaints

Customer complaints on Supplier feedback


Product or system performance
(Product not returned) Internal reliability testing. Issues. Product/Process Design Related
E.g. tight unrealistic tolerances, Capability.
Periodic reliability Process control issues
Surveillance E.g. traceability, yield, etc.
Product or Process
Changes
E.g. failure, etc.

Collect data from various sources during FMEA planning. It is important to learn from historical knowledge and incorporate
preventive measures in the FMEA.
Expanded mind map / Figure 3
Sub

Occurrence

Detection
Severity
Assembly
Failure Local
Description Function End Effects Causes Current controls RPN
Mode Effects
/ Process
Step
Machining Outside Incorrect Re work, re - Does not fit 8 Improper 8 Visual alignment. 7 448
diameter to dimension inspection, at Customer loading (Opportunity for
fit in cam (Over size) added failure Assembly prevention using guided
shaft costs alignment)
Tool wear 5 Tool Setter microscope 5 200
every 100 pieces
(Opportunity to set up
SPC)
Incorrect 2 Automatic 2 32
measurement gauging
Significant Material property 3 Verification of 3 72
differences Certificate of Analysis
Lot size 500 pieces

Expanded mind map contents populated into appropriate columns of FMEA table. See arrows as an example.
Note: The causes are not bundled. They are individually assessed in separate rows. Scores are assigned correctly and risks prioritized.

You might also like