Chanel Denise Mendoza BSBA-FM TTh 3:00-4:30

For my previous ethical theories, I was a consequentialist which holds that the consequences
of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgement about the rightness and wrongness of that
conduct. I was a consequentialist where I tend to think about what are the possible consequences that i
may face after the act. Most of the time I would avoid consequences that will not benefit and are not
good for me.

I was also an ethical egoism which ought to act in their own self-interest. I was an ethical egoism where
sometimes, i tend to do something because the other person has something to exchange out of my act.
And also for my own self-interest. I make an act because it will benefit me in a way.

For the present, I would say I am utilitarian, consequentialist and deontological.

Utilitarian which is to maximize the amount of happiness that we produce from every action. I am a
utilitarian in a way where I act based on where I am happy and where I am contented.

Deontological which states that an act is not good morally can lead to something good. Deontological in
a way where I would do acts that are not moral but not to the point where I would kill people. But i am
just like this if there is a very good reason why I would do such act. I would judge the rightness of action
depending why someone is doing something.

CONCLUSION

To live a morally good life, we should think about an act before doing it. In judging the act to be
good or bad, we should consider so many things such as the reason why a certain person did the act, the
purpose of it as well as what are they trying to achieve. And when our questions are already answered,
then it is when we would tell whether the act done is good or bad, for us. And we should also respect each
other's decision since we have different opinions and choices in life.
 ETHICAL MAP

You're one of the 2 candidates for a very high

A guy raped a 17 year old girl and she
position in the corporate world. You are certain was found dead. After a few days the
that the other candidate has a lot of police caught the guy. Imagine you
misdemeanour and clandestine way of being the judge, what would you
spending corporate funds. And you are the only prefer life imprisonment or death
person who knows about it. The company is penalty for the guy?
asking you reasons why are more suitable for
the promotion. Would you report your
opponent's inappropriate behaviour that
would disqualify him for such position or stay
quiet and let the management discover on their
own?

Death Penalty What to do?

I would stay
quiet and let the
What to do? management
discover

UTILITARIAN DEONTOLOGY

CONSEQUENTIALIST
It holds that the
consequences of one's
conduct are the ultimate
basis for any judgement
UTILITARIAN
NN
It states that an act is
not good morally can
Is to maximize the lead to something good
amount of happiness
that we produce from
every action

I would let the I would be contented As a judge, I would

I am happy with to the decision I prefer death
management know what I chose to act
because if I report the made because I penalty to make
cause I know the
other candidate, the know he deserves it. justice for the death
management would And at the first of the innocent
possible consequence caught his acts and
that I may face is that he place, why would the young girl. Even if
my conscience is guy do an act to an my act is immoral,
will do something bad to clean
me and I would try to innocent girl that he he still deserves it
avoid that. doesn't want to be because the guy has
done to him no good reason, in
any way, to do it.