Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Barriers To Effective
Communication
Emotional Barriers
Attitude Barriers
Perception Barriers
1. Power Distance
Power distance is the willingness of a
culture to accept status and power
differences among its members. In cultures
with low power distance, people are likely
to expect that power is distributed rather
equally, and are furthermore also likely to
accept that power is distributed to less
powerful individuals. As opposed
to this, people in high power distance
cultures will likely both expect and accept
inequality and steep hierarchies.
The fundamental issue here is how a
society handles inequalities among people.
People in societies exhibiting a large
degree of power distance accept a
hierarchical order in which everybody has
a place and which needs no further
justification. In societies with low power
distance, people strive to equalize the
distribution of power and demand
justification for inequalities of power.
2. Uncertainty Avoidance
Uncertainty Avoidance is referring to a
lack of tolerance for ambiguity and a need
for formal rules and policies. This
dimension measures the extent to which
people feel threatened by ambiguous
situations. These uncertainties and
ambiguities may e.g. be handled by an
introduction of formal rules or policies, or
by a general acceptance of ambiguity in
the organizational life. The majority of
people living in cultures with a high degree
of uncertainty avoidance, are likely
to feel uncomfortable in uncertain and
ambiguous situations. People living in
cultures with a low degree of uncertainty
avoidance, are likely to thrive in more
uncertain and ambiguous situations and
environments. Countries exhibiting strong
UAI maintain rigid codes of belief and
behavior and are intolerant of unorthodox
behavior and ideas. Weak UAI societies
maintain a more relaxed attitude in which
practice counts more than principles.
3. Masculinity vs. Femininity It is the
tendency of a culture to stereotypical
masculine or feminine traits. These values
concern the extent on emphasis on
masculine work related goals and
assertiveness (earnings, advancement,
title, respect et.), as opposed to more
personal and humanistic goals (friendly
working climate, cooperation, nurturance
etc.) The first set of goals is usually
described as masculine, whereas the latter
is described as feminine. These goals and
values can, among other, describe how
people are potentially motivated in cultures
with e.g. a feminine or a masculine culture.
Japan is considered a very masculine
culture whereas Thailand is considered a
more feminine culture.
4. Individualism vs. Collectivism
In individualistic cultures people are
expected to portray themselves as
individuals, who seek to accomplish
individual goals and needs. In collectivistic
cultures, people have greater emphasis on
the welfare of the entire group to which the
individual belongs, where individual
wants, needs and dreams are often set
aside for the common good.
5. Long vs. Short Term Orientation
Long-Term Orientation is the fifth
dimension, which was added after the
original four dimensions. This dimension
was identified by Michael Bond and was
initially called Confucian dynamism. Geert
Hofstede added this dimension to his
framework, and labelled this dimension
long vs. short term orientation.
The consequences for work related values
and behaviour springing from this
dimension are rather hard to describe, but
some characteristics are described below.
Long term orientation:
Acceptance of that business results may
take time to achieve The employee wishes
a long relationship with the company
Short term orientation:
Results and achievements are set, and can
be reached within timeframe
The employee will potentially change
employer very often. Pros
Hofstede provided a definition of culture
and how culture can be measured. His
research showed that cultural differences
matter. Managers in international
organizations operate according
to their country’s values, rather than to the
organization’s culture.
Employees from related national cultures
work in similar fashions, thereby reducing
the chance of conflicts. Hofstede’s model
provides managers of cross-cultural
relations a tool to help them understand
differences in value sets and behavior.
The model negates that one set of
principles is universally applicable by
confirming that there are
multiple ways of structuring organizations
and institutions.
An organization’s wider social and cultural
environment plus its technology
determines the level of bureaucracy and
centralization (Scott, Hofstede).
Cons
When Hofstede’s first results were
criticized by
Asian scholars, he added time orientation
as a fifth dimension thereby raising doubts
about whether the typology itself was
exhaustive.
Culture is a far too complex and
multifaceted to be used as a
straightforward organizational change
control. “You do not control culture, at
best you shape it” (Green).
Cluster of countries based on Hofstede’s
dimension of individualism collectivism
and power distance
Q2. Write short note on management
as an integrating activity
There is no one definition for the term
management. However Fayol (1916)
defined the term management
as; To manage is to forecast and plan, to
organise, to command, to co-ordinate and
to control. Mc Ilwee. T and Roberts I,
(1991): p. g 117 Management is not
homogeneous and is undertaken at all
levels of the organisation, as it is an
integrating activity.
Managers have to manage in order to
achieve the overall objectives and strategy
of the firm. All firms are seeking effective
managers, and the quality of management
is a key element of business success. In
this assignment the responsibility of
management is going to be addressed.
Henri Fayol (1961) introduced
four managerial roles and these were
planning, organising, commanding. Co-
ordinating and controlling. Organising-
being responsible four jobs and tasks being
carried out by individuals.
Commanding- giving orders and
instructions and expecting them to be
carried out. Co-ordinating- all activities are
arranged and adjusted in time and
situation to ensure smooth running.
Controlling involves
directing, inspecting and regulating work.
Planning- determines in advance what
should be accomplished and how it should
be accomplished.
(Bounds G, Yorks L, Adams M, Ranney
G, 1994)
However Fayol has been criticised by
Mintzberg as it provides only vague
managerial objectives. As an
alternative Mintzberg proposes ten roles.
Three interpersonal roles-figurehead
(social activities), liaison (communicating
internally and externally), and leadership.
Three informational roles- monitor,
disseminator (passing information to
subordinates), spokesman (passing
information externally) and four decisional
roles-entrepreneur (risk taker), disturbance,
handler, resource allocator and negotiator.
The ten role mentioned are not easily
isolated in practice but form an integrated
whole. (Betts. P, 1989) An important and
integral part of management is the role of
supervisors. The supervisor is usually
regarded as being the first of the
management hierarchy of an organisation.
Although the role varies between
organisations, generally the supervisor is
the management person most directly
concerned with the workforce and with
whom they have the most contact. (Lewis
R and Trevitt
R (1995): pg. 355) They have a prime
responsibility for seeking that others do
work. At the authors par time job Boots
the Chemist the supervisor constructs a
rota, which entails what each employee
will be doing for the
rest of the day at different times. For e. g.
9-10 chemist counter 10-11 cash and wrap
11-12 break etc. It is the supervisors
responsibility that tasks are carried out. It
is the employees duty to carry out the task
and the supervisors responsibility to make
sure the tasks are carried out. We also have
job rotation therefore have a multi skilful
workforce. As the store is very busy and
sometimes there is short of staff others can
do the job as they have been trained.
It is important to have good teamwork.
Group work is also an important
management activity. Group work would
enable employees to share ideas with
others. However, group work is not always
effective if employees dislike one another
of have conflicting opinions. Brech (1957)
identifies four main elements
of management and these being planning,
control, co-ordination and motivation.
Today motivation is an important
management activity. I. e. getting the
members of the teams to pull their
weight effectively. (E. Brech, (1975): pg.
12) Whether of not workers carry out tasks
effectively will depend on the degree to
which the manager motivates them.
As management is about getting things
done it is therefore important to motivate
people so that tasks are carried out. In the
authors part time job at Boots the Chemist
employees receive performance-related
bonus. Whether or not you receive a bonus
is dependent on the contribution made by
an employee to the success of the firm.
Each employees performance is monitored
every week. Employees at the firm were
also asked to sign a contract saying that if
any time is taken of work during the
Christmas period they will not be entitled
to pay rise or Christmas bonus. This has
been newly introduced to avoid
absenteeism, as the Christmas period is the
firms busiest period.
In the eyes of the author this approach is
going to be very successful and that
employees are going to be motivated to
work hard and attend work. Taylor
had a very simplistic view of what
motivated people at work-money. Taylor
however overlooked that people also work
for other reasons other than money.
An alternative view to that of Taylor
comes from Herbert. Needs such as
achievement and recognition are positive
motivators whilst others such as pay
and working conditions, can determine if
they are satisfactory, but will not motivate
positively for long if they are satisfying
(Litterer J (1978): p. g 65) An alternative
view to motivation comes from Mc
Gregors theory X and Y.
In theory X managers tend to dislike their
subordinates, they believe employees do
not really enjoy their work and need to be
controlled. Whereas theory Y employees
do enjoy work and they want to contribute
to ideas and effort. A theory Y manager is
therefore more likely to involve employees
in decisions and give them more
responsibility. The way in which
managers view their employees will reflect
their management style. The management
style will also depend on a number of
factors i. e. personality of manger and
workers and the nature of the task. The
way in which the manager deals with its
colleagues will have a real impact on their
motivation and how effectively they work.
The degree to which workers need to be
motivated will depend on the
organisational structure. (Mullins. L 1999)
At any level in the organisation it is
unlikely that management will be able to
cope adequately with all
aspects of their job on their own.
Delegation exists because no one person
can effectively control all the functions of
a large business.
A manager delegates certain powers to
subordinates.
(Floyd. D (1994): p. g 75) To function
efficiently they must delegate.
Management is about getting work
done through other people, this entails
delegation.
Delegation is one of the most powerful
management skills.
It is the process by which authority to
make specific decisions are given to lower
level management. Is involves
subordinates making decisions. At Boots
the Chemist some subordinates are given
the authority to do exchanges and refunds.
Some are also given the authority to open
the counter cache this is where all
the notes in excess of the working float are
placed. However at times the counter
cache does get blocked and we can inform
those subordinates who are authorised to
open the counter cache. It is very useful as
most of the time the supervisor is not on
the shop floor and therefore can get the
subordinates who are authorised to do the
refunds of exchanges. This would not only
maintain good customer service but would
also allow the supervisor to be doing other
things. It is important that the manager
chooses the right subordinates to whom to
delegate authority and responsibility and
therefore should be able to allocate
important aspects of their jobs to
subordinates. The limitation with
delegation is the delegator might be
unwilling to delegate tasks to subordinates.
Good communication is vital in
organisations and lies at the heart of
effective management.
Effective communication is essential for
organisations without it employees do not
know what to do, how to do it or when to
do it by (Marcouse. I, Gillespie. A, Martin.
B, Surridge. M, Wall. N, (1999): pg. 242)
If there is Communication at all levels
employee would feel part of the company
and will then in return contribute more.
People need to know their targets what
they are doing right and areas, which they
need improving on. At Boots the Chemist,
every 6 months the employees have to
review their contracts with their
supervisor. Here employees concern is
discussed as well as targets, their
performance and areas, which they can
improve on. This enables staff to know
how well they are doing and what is
expected from them. This is also more
likely to produce a much more focused
and committed workforce. We also have
staff meetings here managers are able to
inform staff of new developments, listen to
staff views, answer questions and provide
feedback. There is also a staff notice board
where notices relating to staff can be
put up. This is a good means of getting
information to staff in the store. Likert
(1961) identifies a fourfold model of
management systems. Explotitive-very
little teamwork or communication and
responsibility centred at the top of the
hierarchy.
Benevolent- limited teamwork or
communication, responsibility at
management level but not lower
down. Consultative- fair degree of
teamwork and communication,
responsibility spread more widely.
Participative- higher degree of teamwork
and communication and responsibility
widespread through out all levels. This
model can be related to Mc Gregors
X and Y theory.
Explotitive and Benevolent can be related
to Mc Gregors theory X and Participative
can be corresponded to theory Y. The
culture of the organisation will also effect
the management. The organisations culture
is expressed in the way that people who
make up the organisation act. (Mullins. L,
1999) If employees have theory X
expectations and managers expect theory
Y attitudes the results are delegation and
involvement is likely to produce poor
quality output and misdirection effort.
(Floyd D (1994): pg. 125) There can be
potential problems when both employees
and managers have a different set of
beliefs or expectations.
In conclusion, there are numerous
definitions of management. The role of
management is primarily dependent on the
management style adopted and the culture
of the organisation as well as its aims and
objectives. All firms are seeking good
management, as it would effect the success
of the business. The effectiveness of
management can be measured against level
of staff turnover and absenteeism.
Q3. Discuss Needs and Expectations
at work
even
the best decision does not guarantee a
successful
outcome. The future determines its own
fate, but the
best prepared decision is more likely to
produce the
desired result than any other selection.
1. Determine/Clarify the Decision
Problem/Strategic
Issues:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
The first step in decision making process,
which is very
important, is to identity and define the
problem,
or strategic issues which require making
decisions.
This helps the decision maker to focus on
the right
questions involved in decision. Greater
managerial
skill and expertise is required in defining a
decision
problem to subsequently address it
correctly. For
example, a production manager might
wrongly
consider the choice as make or buy a part
for a
product when the correct decision might be
to
determine whether the product should be
redesigned
so the part is not needed.
Sometimes, the decision problem is quite
complex.
For example, the demand for a company’s
popular
product is declining. What are the reasons
for it?
Declining quality control? Decrease in cus
tomer
satisfaction? Increasing competition?
Availability
of alternative product in the market?
Higher selling
prices? etc.
Before a decision can be made, the
problem needs
to be clarified and defined in more specific
terms. In
some situations, the decision problem may
itself be
clear. For example, a business firm may
receive a special
order for its product at a price below the
regular
market price. The decision under this
situation is clear
i.e. whether to accept or reject the order.
2. Specify the Criteria:
After identifying the decision problem, the
decision
maker should specify the criteria upon
which a
decision is to be made. Most often, the
criteria or the
objective can be easily quantified such as
minimizing
cost, improving profit through increased
return on
investment, increasing share of company
product in
the market.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
Sometimes the criteria or the objectives are
in conflict
with each other, such as where reducing
cost, quality
of the product needs to be maintained.
Also, in some
situa tions, other interested parties or
stakeholders
like shareholders; creditors may have their
own
separate criteria or objectives. Therefore, a
manager
most often is forced to think of multiple
objectives,
both the quantifiable short-term goals and
the more
strategic difficult-to-quantify goals.
3. Identify Alternatives as Possible
Solutions to the
Problem:
Decision making is choosing between the
alternatives.
If the objective is to increase sales, there
can be
many alternatives to achieve this goal. If a
machine
breaks down, it could be repaired or
replaced.
Within the replacement, it may be bought
or leased.
Determining the possible alternatives is an
important
step in the decision making process.
Those alternatives that are clearly not
feasible
should be eliminated from the decision
making
process.
4. Perform Relevant Information Analysis:
In this fourth step, a manager collects
relevant data
(relevant costs and relevant benefits) as
sociated with
each feasible alternative. Selecting data
relating to
decision is one of the management
accountant’s most
important roles in an organization. In this
decision
making step, manager performs an analysis
of
relevant costs and relevant benefits
(revenues) and
other pertinent strategic issues. Manager
also makes
predictions about relevant information
corresponding
to alternatives in terms of future values of
relevant
costs and relevant revenues.
Managers should also identify and analyze,
to the
extent possible, non-financial advantages
and
disadvantages (known as qualitative
factors) about
each feasible alternative while performing
relevant
information analysis.
5. Select and Implement the Best
Alternative:
Based on the relevant cost and relevant
revenue
analysis, the manager, in the fifth step,
selects the
best alternative and executes it.
6. Evaluate Performance:
In the sixth and final step, the manager
evaluates the
performance of the implemented decision
as a basis
for feedback to a possible reconsideration
of this
decision as it relates to future decisions.
The decision
process is thus a feedback-based system in
which the
manager continually evaluates the results
of prior
analyses and decisions to discover any
opportunities
for improvement in decision making.
Q2. Briefly explain about factors
affecting price elasticity
Definition
The concept of Competitive Equilibrium
can be defined
as an equilibrium condition where the
objective of
profit maximization of the firm and the
aim of utility
maximization of the consumers in the
competitive
market is to arrive at an equilibrium price
owing to the
freely determined prices.
As per the theory of Competitive
Equilibrium, the
quantity supplied of the product by the
firm is equal
to the product quantity demanded by the
consumers
in the market.
It is an economic situation of a relative
balance
wherein, neither the buyer nor the seller
can improve
its bargain position of the products offered.
Meaning of Competitive Equilibrium
SEARCH
IT Policy Downloads
5G
Developer
Top DaaS providers
Security
More
Identifying core business processes is first
step toward
customer satisfaction
by Guest Contributor in CXO on May 30,
2002, 12:00
AM PST
Enterprises are beginning to understand
that
consistent customer service is the key to
remaining
competitive in today's market. Learn why a
critical
step in meeting customer expectations
involves clearly
defining and prioritizing core business
processes.
In today’s business environment,
organizations
know that to be competitive, they need to
respond to
change—especially as customer
expectations increase.
Customers are more mobile today, and so
expect a
certain level of quality of service
regardless of where
and how they conduct business. Customers
also expect
organizations to respond with a significant
amount of
personalization.
It is extremely difficult to meet these
challenges
in a timely manner if business processes
are widely
dispersed and inconsistent. Consistent core
business
processes and data representation is
essential to
allow decision makers to respond quickly
to the
changing market.
Defining and maintaining consistent core
business
processes is a lot easier said than done but
critical if
an organization is to survive in today’s
market. In this
article, I'll define core business processes
and explain
how to differentiate these processes from
their
implementation. I'll also pass along some
tips on how
to prioritize which processes to investigate
first.
Defining the core business process
A "core" business process is defined as the
minimum
individual tasks to be accomplished to
provide a
certain level of consistency in output—
without
any consideration to hardware, software, or
performance.
When a core process is implemented,
anything can
be added to make the process more
efficient, but
nothing can be eliminated. When the core
business
process states that certain tasks must be
performed
in sequence, then it must be reflected in the
implementation. In the same manner, any
specified
formulas or steps associated with a task
must also be
reflected within the implementation.
When asked, most organizations will claim
that
their core business processes are
documented. Yet,
typically, it is not the core business process
that has
been documented but the implementation
of that
process within a particular system. In this
scenario,
the documentation contains system or
application
process models reflecting implementation
details such
as "enter username." Most times,
documentation of a
core business process doesn’t reflect
whether a user is
identified by a username, smart card,
biometrics, or
some other method of authentication, as
long as the
organization is satisfied with the accuracy
of the documentation.
Identifying and authenticating a user is
an implementation issue, not a business
process.
It’s not easy to separate implementation
from the
core business process. Just take one
business process
and see how readily you can identify the
major tasks
involved without letting implementation
issues creep
into the mix.
And it only gets more difficult when core
business
processes become more intricate and
critical within
the enterprise.
Using the right process methodology
The methodology used to identify, derive,
or create
core business processes will vary with an
enterprise’s
size, industry, and culture.
But there are several proven
methodologies and
supporting tools for deriving and
improving business
processes.
The first three steps are straightforward:
Investigate and remove hurdles relating to
organizational cultural issues, governance
processes,
and supporting infrastructure up front.
Educate participants on what a core
business process
is, how it will benefit their respective
business area,
and the chosen methodology that will be
used to
derive these processes.
Don’t try and do all of the critical business
processes
at once. Suggest a phase approach with a
sound
transition strategy.
Once you’ve identified core business
processes, it’s
important to prioritize which ones to tackle
first.
A new business channel is a good place to
start, as
business analysis and requirements
gathering have
likely already been done, which should
provide a good
jumping-off point for identifying core
processes.
Next, tackle any business process areas
featuring
disparate results between business
units.Then, look at
processes for which new enabling
technology is being
considered. Rounding out the list are those
processes
supported by different implementation and
those
supported by more than one location or
business.
It’s never too late to start
If enterprises are to remain competitive,
they need
to reduce the complexities resulting from
widely
dispersed and often disparate business
processes.
Establishing consistent core business
processes is just one step toward meeting
increasing customer expectations in today's
market.
Dan Oliver is a managing consultant based
out of the Washington, D.C. office of
Headstrong, a global
consultancy that transforms established
companies into digital businesses that
generate added customer
and shareholder value.