Search wikiHow...

Whether you’re publishing a journal article review or completing one for a class, your critique should
be fair, thorough, and constructive. Skim the article to get a feel for its organization, read it multiple
times, and jot down notes and comments during the process. Evaluate the text section by section,
and assess how well each component fulfills its purpose. Come up with a thesis that concisely
summarizes your evaluation, compose your review, and include specific examples that back up your
claims.

Flight from undefined to undefined

₹ 3,996 undefined
SpiceJet

Part One of Three:

Reading a Text Actively

1 Familiarize yourself with your publication’s style guide. If you’re publishing your review,
check the journal’s format and style guidelines first. Familiarizing yourself with the
publication’s standards will give you an idea of how to evaluate the article and structure your
review.[1]

• Familiarizing yourself with format and style guidelines is especially important if you haven’t
published with that journal in the past. For example, a journal might require you to
 recommend an article for publication, meet a certain word count, or provide revisions thatSearch
the wikiHow...
authors should make.
• If you’re reviewing a journal article for a school assignment, familiarize yourself the guidelines
your instructor provided.

2 Skim the article to get a feel for its organization. First, look through the journal article and
try to trace its logic. Read the title, abstract, and headings to get a feel for how the article is
organized. In this initial, quick skim, identify the question or problem that the article addresses.
 Search wikiHow...

3 Give the article a quick, once-over read. After a quick skim, read the article from beginning
to end to develop an overall impression. At this stage, identify the article’s thesis, or main
argument, and highlight or underline where its stated in the introduction and conclusion.
 Search wikiHow...

4 Reread the article and take notes. After reading it in full, scrutinize the article section by
section. You can print out a copy and write notes and comments in the margins. If you prefer
working with a digital copy, write your notes and comments in a word document.[2]

• While giving the article a closer read, gauge whether and how well the article resolves its
central problem. Ask yourself, “Is this investigation important, and does it uniquely contribute
to its field?”
• At this stage, note any terminological inconsistencies, organizational problems, typos, and
formatting issues.

1 #1 Plagairism Checker
Plagiarism checking software for students, teachers and professionals.
Plagairism Checker X, LLC

2 SP Jain Online EMBA

Engage in real-time learning without interrupting your career. Join Admission
Day SP Jain Global
Advertisement
 Search wikiHow...
Part Two of Three:
Evaluating the Article

1 Decide how well the abstract and introduction map out the article. Examine the abstract
and introduction in detail. Ask yourself the following:[3]

• How well does the abstract summarize the article, the problem it addresses, its techniques,
results, and significance? For example, you might find that an abstract describes a
pharmaceutical study's topic and skips to results without discussing the experiment's methods
with much detail.
• Does the introduction map out the article’s structure? Does it clearly lay out the groundwork?
A good introduction gives you a clear idea of what to expect in the coming sections. It might
state the problem and hypothesis, briefly describe the investigation's methods, then state
whether the experiment proved or disproved the hypothesis.
 Search wikiHow...

2 Evaluate the article’s references and literature review. Most journal articles include a
review of existing literature early on and, throughout, cite previous scholarly work. Determine
if the sources it references are authoritative, how well its literature review summarizes sources,
and whether the sources situate the article in a field of research or simply drop well-known
names.

• If necessary, spend some time perusing copies of the article’s sources so you can better
understand the topic’s existing literature.
• A good literature review will say something like, "Smith and Jones, in their authoritative 2015
study, demonstrated that adult men and women responded favorably to the treatment.
However, no research on the topic has examined the technique's effects and safety in
children and adolescents, which is what we sought to explore in our current work."
 Search wikiHow...

3 Examine the methods. Ask yourself, “Are these methods an appropriate, reasonable means
of solving the problem?” Imagine other possible ways of setting up an experiment or
structuring an investigation, and note any improvements the authors could have made.[4]

• For example, you might observe that subjects in medical study didn’t accurately represent a
diverse population.
 Search wikiHow...

4 Assess how the article presents data and results. Decide whether tables, diagrams,
legends, and other visual aids effectively organize information. Do the results and discussion
sections clearly summarize and interpret the data? Are tables and figures purposeful or
redundant?[5]

• For example, you might find that tables list too much undigested data that the authors don’t
adequately summarize within the text.
 Search wikiHow...

5 Evaluate non-scientific evidence and analyses. For non-scientific articles, decide how well
the article presents the evidence that supports its argument. Is the evidence relevant, and
does the article convincingly analyze and interpret the evidence?

• For example, if you’re reviewing an art history article, decide whether it analyzes an artwork
reasonably or simply leaps to conclusions. A reasonable analysis might argue, “The artist was
a member of Rembrandt’s workshop, which is evident in the painting’s dramatic light and
sensual texture.”
 Search wikiHow...

6 Assess the writing style. Even if it's meant for a specialized audience, an article’s writing
style should be clear, concise, and correct. Evaluate style by asking yourself the following:

• Is the language clear and unambiguous, or does excessive jargon interfere with its ability to
make an argument?
• Are there places that are too wordy? Can any ideas be stated in a simpler way?
• Are grammar, punctuation, and terminology correct?

1 #1 Plagairism Checker
Plagiarism checking software for students, teachers and professionals. Plagairism
Checker X, LLC

2 Online Manuscript Submissions - Send Us

Your Writing Today
We're Currently Open to Submissions in English. Fill Our Form and Get Published!
olympiapublishers.com
Advertisement

Part Three of Three:

Writing Your Review
 Search wikiHow...

1 Outline your review. Look over the notes you took in your section-by-section evaluation.
Come up with a thesis, then outline how you intend to support your thesis in the body of your
review. Include specific examples that reference the strengths and weaknesses that you noted in
your evaluation.[6]

• Your thesis and evidence should be constructive and thoughtful. Point out both strengths and
weaknesses, and propose alternative solutions instead of focusing only on weaknesses.
• A good, constructive thesis would be, “The article demonstrates that the drug works better
than a placebo in specific demographics, but future research that includes a more diverse
subject sampling is necessary.”
 Search wikiHow...

2 Write your review’s first draft. After forming a thesis and making an outline, you’re ready to
start composing your review. While the structure will depend on your publication’s guidelines,
you can typically follow these general guidelines:[7]

• The introduction summarizes the article and states your thesis.

• The body provides specific examples from the text that support your thesis.
• The conclusion summarizes your review, restates your thesis, and offers suggestion for future
research.
 Search wikiHow...

3 Revise your draft before submitting it. After writing your first draft, check for typos and
make sure your grammar and punctuation are correct. Try to read your work as if you were
someone else. Is your critique fair and balanced, and do the examples you included support your
argument?[8]

• Make sure your writing is clear, concise, and logical. If you mention that an article is too
verbose, your own writing shouldn’t be full of unnecessarily complicated terms and
sentences.
• If possible, have someone familiar with the topic read your draft and offer feedback.

Hotels in Pattaya Hotels in Lonavala Hotels in Ahmedabad Hotels in Phuket City

from ₹ 576 from ₹ 736 from ₹ 641 from ₹ 553

Book Now Book Now Book Now Book Now

Advertisement
 Search wikiHow...
Community Q&A

Ask a Question

Your question here

Submit

Hotels in Pattaya Hotels in Lonavala Hotels in Ahmedabad Hotels in Phuket City

from ₹ 576 from ₹ 736 from ₹ 641 from ₹ 553

Book Now Book Now Book Now Book Now

Advertisement

Related wikiHows

How to
Summarize a Journal Article
 Search wikiHow...

How to
Find Scholarly Articles Online

International Research PhD Topic and Online Manuscript A Great Reading

Journal - Read Research Proposal Help - Unique Submissions - Send Us Program - With Step by
Papers Online and Novel Suggestions Your Writing Today Step Lesson Plans
Ad authorservices.taylorandfrancis.c… Ad phdhyderabad.com Ad olympiapublishers.com Ad childrenlearningreading.org

How to
Submit Articles to Publications
 Search wikiHow...

How to
Write a Peer Review Report

How to
Use APA Formatting for Academic Papers
 Search wikiHow...

How to
Write a Scholarly Abstract

How to
Cite a Scientific Journal
 Search wikiHow...

How to
Search Pubmed

1 SP Jain Online EMBA

Engage in real-time learning without interrupting your career. Join Admission
Day SP Jain Global

2 #1 Plagairism Checker
Plagiarism checking software for students, teachers and professionals.
Plagairism Checker X, LLC
Advertisement

About This Article

Co-Authored By:
wikiHow Staff Editor

This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers who validated it for accuracy and
comprehensiveness. Together, they cited information from 8 references. wikiHow's Content Management Team
carefully monitors the work from our editorial staff to ensure that each article meets our high standards.

Co-authors: 8
Updated: March 29, 2019
129 votes - 94%
Views: 50,630

Categories: Featured Articles | Academic Journals | Academic Writing | Critical Reviews

In other languages

References

1. ↑ http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/09/how-review-paper
 2. ↑ http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/09/how-review-paper
Search wikiHow...
3. ↑ http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/using-scientific-journal-article-write-cri
tical-review
4. ↑ http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/using-scientific-journal-article-write-cri
tical-review
5. ↑ http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/using-scientific-journal-article-write-cri
tical-review
6. ↑ http://library.queensu.ca/inforef/criticalreview.htm
7. ↑ http://library.queensu.ca/inforef/criticalreview.htm
8. ↑ http://library.queensu.ca/inforef/criticalreview.htm

Reader Success Stories

Anonymous
A Jun 30

"My professor did not have a template available for our scholarly journal review assignment. I have
never done one..." more

More reader stories

Share your story

Did this article help you?

Yes No

#1 Plagairism Checker
Plagiarism checking
software for students,
teachers and
professionals.
Plagairism Checker X, LLC
Advertisement

rprise Me
Su
!
wikiHow to... Search wikiHow...