Lge001 Csa Cal 045 PDF

PROJECT:
LUWUK GAS ENGINE POWER PLANT 40 MW
OWNER :
PT. PERUSAHAAN LISTRIK NEGARA (PERSERO)
ENGINEER:
PT. PLN ENJINIRING
CONTRACT NO. :
0758.PJ/DAN.02.01/DIR/2017
PLN DOC. NO. :
TITLE:
PIPE CROSS OVER FOUNDATION CALCULATION

PURPOSE:
FOR APPROVAL
REV DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED DATE

0 Issued For Approval Ari Toto Ananto
DOC. NO.:
CONTRACTOR :
KONSORSIUM
LGE001-CSA-CAL-045
Page 1 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
3. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
Project Name : GEPP 40MW LUWUK Site Name : PIPE CROSSOVER
Client : PLN (PERSERO) Site ID : -
Tower Type : STEEL STRUCTURE Foundation Type : Spread Footing
A. LOAD CASE
Maximum Force on Pedestal :
Uplift Force - T (ton) = 0.01
Compressive Force - C (ton) = 0.46
Lateral Force - H (ton) = 0.46 eB
Moment - M (ton-m) = 0.46
B1
Load Eccentricities :
eL
Eccentricity along Width of Footing - eB (m) = 0.00 Pedestal
Eccentricity along Length of Footing - eL (m) = 0.00
Footing
B. FOUNDATION GEOMETRY
Y Tie Beam
Depth of Foundation - H (mm) = 800
L
Pedestal B2
Center to Center Pedestal - Sp (mm) = 1200 X
Width of Pedestal - B1 (mm) = 250 B
Height of Pedestal above Ground - T1 (mm) = 175
B1
Height of Pedestal - H1 (mm) = 775
Edge Pedestal to Edge Footing - B' (mm) = 175
Grade of Concrete - K (kg/cm2) Ground Level
T1
= 300
f'c (kg/cm2) = 300
T2
Pedestal
Tie Beam φ
H1
Tie Beam
H2
Width of Tie Beam - B2 (mm) = 0
T4
Backfill
Height of Tie Beam - H2 (mm) = 0
H
T3
Top Tie Beam to Ground Surface - T2 (mm) = N/A
Grade of Concrete - K (kg/cm2) = 300
H3
Footing
f'c (kg/cm2) = 300
Footing B
Width of Footing - B (mm) = 600
Length of Footing - L (mm) = 1500
Footing Thickness - H3 (mm) = 200 Figure 1. Foundation Geometry
Top Footing to Bottom Tie Beam - T3 (mm) = N/A
Top Footing to Ground Surface - T4 (mm) = 600
Grade of Concrete - K (kg/cm2) = 300
f'c (kg/cm2) = 300
C. SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FROM SONDIR TEST

Soil Bearing Capacity - qc (ton/m2) = 380
Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity - Qall (ton/m2 = qc/30
= 12.67
D. BEARING CAPACITY
Eccentricity Load Condition = No Eccentricity
eL/L = 0.000 L (m) = 1.50
eB/B = 0.000 B (m) = 0.60
Case of Two-Way Eccentricities : N/A Case of One-Way Eccentricity : N/A
Case 1 : eL/L ≥ 1/6 and eB/B ≥ 1/6 NO Case 1 : Eccentricity along Width of Footing (eL = 0) NO
Case 2 : eL/L < 0.5 and 0 < eB/B < 1/6 NO Case 2 : Eccentricity along Length of Footing (eB = 0) NO
Case 3 : eL/L < 1/6 and 0 < eB/B < 0.5 NO Effective Area of Foundation caused by Eccentricity :
Case 4 : eL/L < 1/6 and eB/B < 1/6 NO A' (m2) = B' L' = N/A
B' (m) = Effective Width = N/A (Two-Way Eccentricities)
Case 3 Case 4
B1/B B2/B B2/B
0.00 0.00 0.00
= N/A (One-Way Eccentricity)
L' (m) = Effective Length = N/A (Two-Way Eccentricities)
Case 2 Case 4
L1/L L2/L L2/L
0.00 0.00 0.00
= N/A (One-Way Eccentricity)
Page 2 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
Bearing Capacity According to Terzaghi's Formula :

qu (ton) = (Eq. D.1)
where :
Case 1
h1
q1 c
Square φ
GWT
H
ϒsat
then :
h1 (m) = NO (level of GWT below ground surface)
GWT Cond. = N/A (see Figure 2) q2
H' (m) = 0.00
He (m) = 0.5B tan (45 + φ/2) (approximately depth of B
= 0.47 wedge zone)
φ = 25° (internal friction angle)
Nq = 12.7 Case 2
(Terzaghi's bearing
Nc = 25.1
capacity factor)
Nγ = 9.7
sc = 1.30 ϒ
(shape factor) c
sγ = 0.80
H = h1
φ
γe (ton/m3) = ( γe is an everage effective
unit weight of the soil in
= 0.00 the wedge zone) q
q (ton/m2) = Overburden Pressure (OP) γ' (ton/m3) = γsat - γw GWT
= γH = 0.79 B ϒsat
= 1.38
c (ton/m2) = Cohession
= 3.50 Case 3
thus, Terzaghi's Ultimate Bearing Capacity :
qu (ton/m2) = 135.81
Bearing Capacity of an Eccentically Loaded Foundation : ϒ
Qu (ton) = qu A' c
= 0.00 φ
H
then, Terzaghi's Allowable Bearing Capacity :

qall (ton/m2) = qu/SF (if centrically loaded) or (Qu/A)/SF (if eccentrically loaded)
h1
SF = 3 q
qall (ton/m2) = 45.27 (centrically loaded)
qall (ton/m2) = N/A
wedge zone
(eccentrically loaded) B
H'
q'
Bearing Capacity According to Meyerhof's Formula :
GWT
qu (ton) = (Eq. D.2)
where : ϒsat
Figure 2. Ground Water Table (GWT) Conditions

Page 3 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
then :
φ = 25° (internal friction angle)
Nq = 10.7
(Meyerhof's bearing
Nc = 20.71
capacity factor)
Nγ = 6.8
Kp = tan2 (45 + φ/2)
= 2.46
B' (m) = Effective Width
= 0.60
D (m) = 0.80
shape factor :
sc = 1.49
sq = sγ = 1.25
depth factor :
dc = 1.42
dq = dγ = 1.21
γe (ton/m3) = ( γe is an everage effective (Eq. D.3)
unit weight of the soil in
= 0.00 the wedge zone)
q (ton/m2) = Overburden Pressure γ' (ton/m3) = γsat - γw
= γH
= 1.38
c (ton/m2) = Cohession
= 3.50
thus, Meyerhof's Ultimate Bearing Capacity :
qu (ton/m2) = 181.14
Ultimate Load of an Eccentically Loaded Foundation :
C
Qu (ton) = qu A'
= 0.00
then, Meyerhof's Allowable Bearing Capacity : M
qall (ton/m2) = qu/SF (if centrically loaded) or (Qu/A)/SF (if eccentrically loaded)
SF = 3
qall (ton/m2) = 60.38 (centrically loaded)
qall (ton/m2) = N/A (eccentrically loaded)
The summary of Allowable Bearing Capacity - qall :
qall (ton/m2) = 12.67 (Sondir)
qall (ton/m2) = 45.27 (Terzaghi)
qall (ton/m2) = 60.38 (Meyerhof)
qall (ton/m2) = 12.67 (Used allowable bearing capacity)
Check bearing capacity against compressive force :
Q min
P M P M
Q max
Qmax (ton/m2) =  Qmin (ton/m2) =  (Eq. D.4)

A S A S
where : B
P (ton) = Wc + Ws + C
= 1.87
A (m2) = BxL Figure 3. Illustration of Bearing Pressure under Footing
= 0.9
M (ton-m) = H x Ht if centrically loaded or (H x Ht) + (C x e) if eccentrically loaded
= 0.44
S (m3) = Static Moment of Section
= 0.23
thus :
Qmax (ton/m2) = 4.06
Qmax < Qall ……….. OK ! (Foundation is Sufficient to Support Compressive Force)
Qmin (ton/m2) = 0.11
Qmin > 0 ……….. OK ! (Foundation is Stable)
Page 4 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
E. CAPACITY AGAINST UPLIFT FORCE

Depth Ratio :
D/B = 1.33
Limiting H/B (as a function of φ) :
φ = 25° (frustum angle)
H/B = 3
check :
D/B < H/B …………. Shallow Foundation !
Formula of Uplift Capacity of Foundation :

Tu = Perimeter Resistance + W (Eq. E.1)
where :
Tu = maximum bearing capacity of foundation against uplift force (ton)
Wc = weight of concrete + weight of soil uplifted (ton)
Formula 1. Shallow Foundation :

Tu = 2 su D (B + L) + γ D2 (2 sf B + L - B) Ku tanφ + W (Eq. E.2)
where the side friction adjustment factor - sf = 1 + mD/B
Shallow Foundation - Use Formula 1 !
Formula 2. Deep Foundation :
Tu = 2 su H (B + L) + γ (2D - H) (2 sf B + L - B) H Ku tanφ + W (Eq. E.3)
where the side friction adjustment factor - sf = 1 + mH/B
then :
L1 (m) = 0.00
H (m) = 0.80
D (m) = 0.80
L (m) = B (m) ===> for square footing
= 0.60
m = 0.1
sf = 1.13
su = Undrained Shear Strength (ton/m2)
Formula 1. Granular Soil (c = 0)
= σ' tan φ ========> σ' = σ - u (Eq. E.4)
σ = γH Granular Soil - Use Formula 1 !
u = γw Zw
Formula 2. Cohessive Soil ( φ = 0)
= c = qu/2 (Unconfined Compression) =====> qu (ton/m2) = 6.5 3.250 (Eq. E.5)
= c + tan φ (Consolidated Undrained) 3.966 (Eq. E.6)
thus su :
= 0.65
Ku = Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient
 20 
Ku = tan 2  45    Kp (Eq. E.7)
 2 
= 2.04
Ku = Kp
= 1.43
Ku = 0.65 + 0.5φ ===> ( φ in radians)
= 0.87
Ku = Ko
= 1 - sin 20° Figure 4. Footings for Tension Load
= 0.66
Average Ku = 1.25
γ (ton/m3) = Unit Weight of Soil = γwet Unit Weight of Water - γw (ton/m3) = 1
= 1.73 Moisture Content - w (%) = 34.07
Page 5 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
γsat (ton/m3) = Saturated Unit Weight of Soil Specific Gravity of Soil - Gs = 2.59
= 1.79 γdry (ton/m3) = γwet / (1 + w) (Eq. E.8)
3
γc (ton/m ) = Unit Weight of Concrete = 1.29
= 2.40 Vs (m3) = γdry / (Gs γw) (Eq. E.9)
3
Vc (m ) = 0.23 (volume of concrete) = 0.50
Wc (ton) = 0.55 (weight of concrete) Vv (m3) = 1 - Vs (Eq. E.10)
3 st
Vs1 (m ) = 0.50 (volume of backfill soil - 1 layer) = 0.50
Vs2 (m3) = 0.00 (volume of backfill soil - 2 nd layer)
Ws (ton) = 0.87 (weight of backfill soil)
W (ton) = Wc + Ws
= 1.42 (total weight of concrete + backfill soil)
thus, Ultimate Uplift Force :
Tu (ton) = 3.53
Allowable Uplift Force :
Tall (ton) = Tu/SF
SF = 3
Tall (ton) = 1.18
check :
Tall > T ……….. OK ! (Foundation is Sufficient to Support Uplift Force)
F. CAPACITY AGAINST SHEAR FORCE

Formula :
SF = (ΣV / ΣH) δ > 1.5 (Eq. F.1)
where :
ΣV = total vertical force (ton) = Wc + Ws + C
= 1.87
ΣH = total horizontal force (ton)
= 0.46
δ = coefficient of friction = 0.45
thus :
1.8 > 1.5 ……….. OK ! (Foundation is Sufficient against Lateral Force)
G. PUNCHING SHEAR ON FOOTING

Two-Way Punching Shear
Formula :
φVc > Vu
where :
φ = shear strength reduction factor
= 0.75
Vc1 = 1st formula of concrete shear strength (ton)
 4 '
=  2   fc b 0 d (Eq. G.1)
 β c 
βc = ratio of long side to short side of the column,

concentrated load or reaction area
=1 Critical Area
b0 (cm) = 4 (H3 + B1) Pedestal
L
= 180 Footing
d (cm) = H3
= 20 H3/2 B1 H3/2
thus :
b0
Vc1 (ton) = 340.84
Vc2 = 2nd formula of concrete shear strength (ton)
B
α d  '
=  s  2  fc b 0 d (Eq. G.2)
 b0  Figure 5. Two-Way Punching Shear Area
αs = 40 (for interior column) interior column
30 (for edge column) then αs =

20 (for corner column) 40
Page 6 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
thus :
Vc2 (ton) = 366.09 B1
Vc3 = 3rd formula of concrete shear strength (ton)
= 4 fc ' b 0 d (Eq. G.3)
thus :
Vc3 (ton) = 227
Pedestal
the smallest Vc :
Vc (ton) = 227.23
thus, Design Shear Strength :
Footing
φVc (ton) = 170.42
then :
Vu = factored shear force on critical area (ton)
H3
= C . Shade Ratio (Eq. G.4)
where :
FootingArea PunchingArea B
Shade Ratio = (Eq. G.5)
FootingArea
= 0.44 Figure 6. Two-Way Punching Shear Line
thus, Ultimate Shear Strength :
Vu (ton) = 0.20
check :
φVc > Vu ……….. OK ! (Footing is Sufficient to Support Two-Way Punching Shear)
One-Way Punching Shear

Formula :
φVc > Vu
where : Critical Area
φ = shear strength reduction factor
= 0.75
L = b0
Vc1 = 1st formula of concrete shear strength (ton) Pedestal
 4 ' Footing
=  2   fc b0d H3/2
 βc 
βc = ratio of long side to short side of the column,
concentrated load or reaction area
=1
B
b0 (cm) = L
= 60
d (cm) = H3 Figure 7. One-Way Punching Shear Area
= 20
thus : B1
Vc1 (ton) = 113.61
Vc2 = 2nd formula of concrete shear strength (ton)
 αs d  '
=   2 fc b0d Pedestal
 b0 
αs = 40 (for interior column) interior column
30 (for edge column) then αs = Footing
20 (for corner column) 40

thus :
H3
Vc2 (ton) = 290.35

Vc3 = 3rd formula of concrete shear strength (ton)
B
= 4 fc ' b 0 d
thus :
Vc3 (ton) = 76 Figure 8. One-Way Punching Shear Line
the smallest Vc :
Vc (ton) = 75.74
thus, Design Shear Strength :
φVc (ton) = 56.81
Page 7 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
then :
Vu = factored shear force on critical area (ton)
= C . Shade Ratio
where :
Footing Area  PunchingArea
Shade Ratio =
FootingArea
= 0.88
thus, Ultimate Shear Strength :
Vu (ton) = 0.40
check :
φVc > Vu ……….. OK ! (Footing is Sufficient to Support One-Way Punching Shear)
H. REQUIRED REINFORCEMENT
Pedestal Reinforcement
Design of Longitudinal Reinforcement
Minimum Percentage of Reinforcement = 1.00% Actual Percentage of Reinforcement = 1.70%
Gross Area of Section - Ag (cm2) = 625
Total Area of Longitudinal Reinforcement - Ast1 (cm2) = 6.25
Try to Use Reinforcement :
Number of Rebar = 8 Ast2 > Ast1 ………………OK ! (Assumption Rebar Area is Sufficient)
Dia. (mm) = 13
Total Area of Longitudinal Reinforcement - Ast2 (cm2) = 10.62
Type and Grade of Reinforcement = Deformed
Tensile Strength - fu (MPa) = 560
Minimum Yield Stress - fy (MPa) = 390
Concrete Cover (mm) = 50
Formula :
φPn > Pu
where :
Pu (ton) = C
= 0.46
Pn (ton) = 0.80 φ [0.85 fc' (Ag - Ast) + fy Ast] tied column, φ = 0.65 (Eq. H.1)
tied column = 0.65
= 89.15 spiral column, φ = 0.75
thus :
φPn (ton) = 57.95
Check Axial Load Capacity of Column :
φPn > Pu ……….. OK ! (Pedestal is Sufficient to Support Axial Load)
U-Stirrup
Y-Direction
Used Longitudinal Reinforcement : 8 D 13
Tied
Stirrup
Design of Ties
Longitudinal
Type and Grade of Reinforcement = Plain fu (MPa) = 380 B1
Reinforcement
Try to use Dia. (mm) = 10 fy (MPa) = 235
U-Stirrup
Spacing (S) of stirrup is the smallest from :
X-Direction
16 x dia. of longitudinal reinforcement (mm) = 208
48 x dia. of strirrup (mm) = 480
The smallest of pedestal width (mm) = 250 B1 or bw
The smallest spacing - S (mm) = 208
Used spacing - S (mm) = 200
Figure 9. Illustration of Pedestal Reinforcement
Check for Requirement Shear Reinforcement Area :
Asmin-1 (mm2) = not less than Asmin-2 (mm2) = used Asmin (mm2) = 70.92 (Eq. H.2)
= 65.69 = 70.92
Actual Shear Reinforcement Area : check :
Av (mm2) = 2 (πr2) Asmin < Av No Need Additional U-Stirrup !
= 157.08
Try to Use U-Stirrup Dia. (mm) = N/A

Direction of U-Stirrup = N/A
Spacing of U-Stirrup (mm) = N/A
Page 8 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
Av1 (mm2) = N/A

then, Actual Shear Reinforcement Area become :
Av' (mm2) = Av + Av1
= #VALUE!
check :
Av' > Asmin ……….. (Minimum Shear Reinforcement Area is Sufficient)
Design of Cross Sections Subject to Shear :

φVn ≥ Vu
where :
φ = shear strength red. factor = 0.65
Vn = Vc + Vs Vc (lb) = Vc (lb) = 8507.15 (Eq. H.3)

Vc (ton) = 3.86
where :
Nu (lb) = C bw (in) = B1
= 1005.31 = 9.84
Ag (in2) = B1 x B1 d (in) = B1 - c - Ds - (D/2)
= 96.88 = 7.22
f'c (psi) = 3541.61 hence :
Vn (ton) = 7.31
Vs (ton) = = 3.45 φVn (ton) = 4.75 (Eq. H.4)
Vu (ton) = H
= 0.46
check :
φVn > Vu No Need Additional U-Stirrup !
Try to Use U-Stirrup Dia. (mm) = N/A

Av' (mm2) = N/A
Direction of U-Stirrup = N/A
Spacing of U-Stirrup (mm) = N/A
Vs' (ton) = N/A
After add U-Stirrup, we get :
Vn (ton) = Vc + (Vs + Vs') = N/A
φVn (ton) = N/A
check :
φVn > Vu ……….. OK ! (Pedestal is Sufficient to Support Shear Force)
Used Tied Reinforcement : Ø 10 - 200

N/A N/A
B1
Footing Reinforcement
Dia. (mm) = 13
Spacing (mm) = 200
Pedestal
Concrete Cover Footing
c (mm) = 50
Bearing Force of Soil to Footing - q (ton) = Qmax
= .e.L
H3
= 1.07
where :
q
e (m) = (B - B1) / 2 if centrically loaded or (B/2) + e - (B1/2) if eccentically loaded
= 0.18 e
then : B
Moment at Face of Pedestal - M (ton-m) = q . e/2 (see Figure 9)
= 0.09
The area of reinforcement : Figure 10. Critical Flexure Location
kd
b fc jd  M  A s fs j d (Eq. H.5)
2
Page 9 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
2
then :
Asreq. (mm2) = M / (fs j d) Es (MPa) = 199948 Ec (MPa) = 23225
where :
fs (MPa) = fy
j = 1 - k/3 k = n / (n + r) n = Es/Ec r = fy / f'c
= 0.88 = 0.35 = 8.61 = 15.66
d (mm) = H3 - concrete cover - rebar diameter/2
= 143.5
thus :
Asreq. (mm2) = 18.52
then :
Total Area of Reinforcement - Astotal (mm2) = 464.56
Check :
Astotal > Asreq ……….. OK ! (Assumption Rebar Area is Sufficient)
Used X - Reinforcement (Top & Bott.) : D 13 - 200

Used Y - Reinforcement (Top & Bott.) : D 13 - 200
Tie Beam Reinforcement

Design of Longitudinal Reinforcement
Number of Rebar = 4
Top Rebar Arrangement = 2
Bottom Rebar Arrangement = 2 MA MB
Dia. (mm) = 13 w
Total Area of Longitudinal Reinforcement - Ast (cm2) 5=.31 N N
Tension Area of Longitudinal Reinforcement - As (cm2) =2.65 A B
fmax
L
Concrete Cover (mm) = 40
̶ ̶
Check Flexural Reinforcement Capacity : +

φMn > Mu
Mmax
where :
φ = 0.90 Figure 11. Force Diagram of Tie Beam
 a A s fy
Mn (ton-m) = As fy d -  a (cm) = (Eq. H.6)
 2 0.85fc ' b
= #DIV/0! = #DIV/0!
φMn (ton-m) = #DIV/0!
then :
Loading on Tie Beam :
wtie beam (ton/m) = 0.00
wsoil above tie beam (ton/m) = 0.00 w (ton/m) = 0.25
wlive load (ton/m) = 0.25
thus, Forces which working on Tie Beam :
Bending Moment on Tie Beam :
MA = MB (ton-m) = (wL2)/12 (Eq. H.7)
= 0.02
M (ton-m) = 0.02
Mmax (ton-m) = (wL2)/24 (Eq. H.8)
= 0.01
Normal Force on Tie Beam :
N (ton) = 0.10 C + H C = 0.46
= 0.50 H = 0.46
fmax (m) = (wL4) / 384 EI E (MPa) = 23217.24 (Eq. H.9)
2
= N/A E (ton/m ) = 2368158.36
MN (ton-m) = N . fmax I (m4) = 0.0000
= N/A
Page 10 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
hence :
Mu (ton-m) = M + MN
= #DIV/0!
thus :
φMn N/A
Used Longitudinal Reinforcement : 4 D 13
Design of Ties
Formula :
Asmin-1 (mm2) = not less than Asmin-2 (mm2) = used Asmin (mm2) = 0.00 (Eq. H.10)
= 0.00 = 0.00
Type and Grade of Reinforcement = Plain fu (MPa) = 380

Try to use Dia. (mm) = 8 fy (MPa) = 235
As (mm2) = 100.53 As > used Asmin …………… (Shear Reinforcement Area is Sufficient)
Spacing (S) of stirrup is shall be less than from : d/2
S (mm) = -27.25
Used S (mm) = -20
Check for Reinforcement Shear Capacity :

Formula :
Vs (ton) = (Eq. H.11)
= 6.44
Check for Concrete Shear Capacity : Tied Ties
Formula : H2
Vc (ton) = 0.17λ f'c b w d λ = 1 Longitudinal (Eq. H.12)
= 0.00 Reinforcement
Nominal Shear Force :

Vn (ton) = Vc + Vs (Eq. H.13)
B2 or bw
= 6.44
Ultimate Shear Force :
Vu (ton) = w/2 w (ton) = 0.24 Figure 12. Illustration of Tie Beam Reinforcement
= 0.12
Check for Design Concrete Shear Capacity :
Formula :
φVn ≥ Vu (Eq. H.14)
where :
φ = shear reduction factor
= 0.75
then :
φVn (ton) = 4.83
check :
φVn > Vu ……….. OK ! (Design Shear Capacity of Tie Beam is Sufficient)
Used Tied Reinforcement : Ø8 -- 20

Page 11 - 11
18/09/2018 - 08:57
I. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Table of Summary of Analysis
Foundation Stability
Max. Base Pressure Allowable Bearing of Soil
Design Requirement Ratio Remark for Analysis Result
(ton/m2) (ton/m2)
Qmax. 4.06 q all 12.66666667 3.12 OK - design is sufficient
Bearing Capacity
Qmin. 0.11 qall 0 - OK - found. is stable
Ultimate Uplift Force - Tu Allowable Uplift Force - Tall
(ton) (ton)
Uplift Capacity 0.01 1.18 117.78 OK - design is sufficient
Design Requirement Actual Safety Factor Minimum Safety Factor Ratio Remark for Analysis Result
Sliding Capacity 1.8 1.5 1.23 OK - design is sufficient

Concrete Assessment
Ultimate Axial Force - Pu Design Axial Force - φPn
(ton) (ton)
Pedestal - Axial Capacity 0.46 57.95 127.08 OK - design is sufficient
Ultimate Shear Force - Vu Design Shear Force - φVn
(ton) (ton)
Pedestal - Shear Capacity 0.46 4.75 10.42 OK - design is sufficient
Ultimate Shear Force - Vu Design Shear Force - φVc
(ton) (ton)
Slab - Punching Shear by Pedestal - One Way 0.40 56.81 142.37 OK - design is sufficient
Slab - Punching Shear by Pedestal - Two Ways 0.20 170.42 854.24 OK - design is sufficient
Ultimate Shear Force - Vu Design Shear Force - φVc
(ton) (ton)
Tie Beam - Shear Capacity 0.12 4.83 40.66 OK - design is sufficient

Lge001 Csa Cal 045 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lge001 Csa Cal 045 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT:

LUWUK GAS ENGINE POWER PLANT 40 MW

PT. PERUSAHAAN LISTRIK NEGARA (PERSERO)

PT. PLN ENJINIRING

PLN DOC. NO. :

PIPE CROSS OVER FOUNDATION CALCULATION

REV DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED DATE

C. SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FROM SONDIR TEST

Bearing Capacity According to Terzaghi's Formula :

then, Terzaghi's Allowable Bearing Capacity :

Figure 2. Ground Water Table (GWT) Conditions

Qmax (ton/m2) =  Qmin (ton/m2) =  (Eq. D.4)

E. CAPACITY AGAINST UPLIFT FORCE

Formula of Uplift Capacity of Foundation :

Formula 1. Shallow Foundation :

F. CAPACITY AGAINST SHEAR FORCE

G. PUNCHING SHEAR ON FOOTING

βc = ratio of long side to short side of the column,

30 (for edge column) then αs =

One-Way Punching Shear

30 (for edge column) then αs = Footing

20 (for corner column) 40

Vc2 (ton) = 290.35

Try to Use U-Stirrup Dia. (mm) = N/A

Av1 (mm2) = N/A

Design of Cross Sections Subject to Shear :

Vn = Vc + Vs Vc (lb) = Vc (lb) = 8507.15 (Eq. H.3)

Try to Use U-Stirrup Dia. (mm) = N/A

Used Tied Reinforcement : Ø 10 - 200

Used X - Reinforcement (Top & Bott.) : D 13 - 200

Tie Beam Reinforcement

Check Flexural Reinforcement Capacity : +

Used Longitudinal Reinforcement : 4 D 13

Type and Grade of Reinforcement = Plain fu (MPa) = 380

Check for Reinforcement Shear Capacity :

Nominal Shear Force :

Used Tied Reinforcement : Ø8 -- 20

Sliding Capacity 1.8 1.5 1.23 OK - design is sufficient

You might also like