You are on page 1of 7

Salt Spray Test for

corrosion preventive oils


Method : ASTM B 117

Test Solution : 5+1 parts of NaCl in 95 parts of H2O

Test Temperature : 35 oC

Air supply : Compressed air 10 – 25 psi

Atomization and Fog quantity :1 – 2 mL/hour/80cm2

Cleaning of the panels : Panels to be dipped in


clean running water (temperature: < 38oC) and
dried immediately
2
Method : ASTM B 117

Advantages:

– Comparing product(similar product mixes) performance


-Accelerated test – less time consuming

Disadvantages:

-Too harsh test condition


-Poor reproducibility / repeatability
-Poor correlation with field results in comparing different
type of products

3
Method : ASTM B117

QUOTE

3.2 Prediction of performance in natural environments


has seldom been correlated with salt spray results when
used as stand alone data.

3.3 Variability has been observed when similar


specimens are tested in different fog chambers even
though testing conditions are nominally similar and
within the ranges specified in this practice.

UNQUOTE

4
Salt spray : Quaker Field performance - Correlation

Product KV at % of Type Humidity Salt Field


40deg activ of cabinet spray performance
C,cSt es base (cycles) (hours)

A 4.4 9.7 P 40 9 48 3(poor)

T-
B1 4.6 41 469 18 16 1(excellant)

B2 2.4 21 T- 14 8 2(moderate)
469

T-
B3 1.9 11 469 8 <8 3(poor)
5
Experience/Learnings

- Based on our experience, its very difficult to get


a high and consistent salt spray resistance for
thin film corrosion preventive chemistries
- We need a thicker/waxy film to get a good salt
spray resistance
- Thicker films can cause problems in the downstream processes

- Salt spray are a good test method to evaluate


coatings/paints
- Poor correlation with the field performance
- Better correlation with the field performance
achieved with Humidity Chamber performance.
6
Thank you

18-Oct-13 MW Dev. lab, Quaker India 7

You might also like