SYNDICATE 9: AHP CASE

- Surrendra SIgh (exchange student)

- Ghina Athaya 29119159
- Yegi Esarianita 29119139
- Siti Nuur Fatinah 29119073
- M. Apriandito 29119004

A. Graphical Representation
B. Weight Calculation

Criteria Cost Style Criteria Cost Style Priority

Cost 1.000 3.000 Cost 0.75 0.75 0.75
Style 0.333 1.000 Style 0.25 0.25 0.25
Column Total 1.333 4.000

Cost Arrow Bestmobile Commuter Cost Arrow Bestmobile Commuter Priority

Arrow 1.000 0.333 3.000 Arrow 0.231 0.231 0.231 0.231
Bestmobile 3.000 1.000 9.000 Bestmobile 0.692 0.692 0.692 0.692
Commuter 0.333 0.111 1.000 Commuter 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077
Column Total 4.333 1.444 13.000 *We check on the excel the number are diffrent after 4 decimal

Style Arrow Bestmobile Commuter Style Arrow Bestmobile Commuter Priority

Arrow 1.000 7.000 0.333 Arrow 0.241 0.412 0.231 0.295
Bestmobile 0.143 1.000 0.111 Bestmobile 0.034 0.059 0.077 0.057
Commuter 3.000 9.000 1.000 Commuter 0.724 0.529 0.692 0.649
Column Total 4.143 17.000 1.444

Before proceeding further, All the matrices with more than 2 columns were checked for consistency.

Priority Matrix Criterion

Cost Style Cost 0.75
Arrow 0.231 0.295 Style 0.25
Bestmobile 0.692 0.057
Commuter 0.077 0.649
[3X2] [2X1]
Decision
Arrow 0.247 * Based on the AHP Analysis Bestmobile is prefered car model
Bestmobile 0.533
Commuter 0.220

C. Consitency Check

a. Style

Style Arrow Bestmobile Commuter

Arrow 1.000 7.000 0.333
Bestmobile 0.143 1.000 0.111
Commuter 3.000 9.000 1.000

Style Arrow Bestmobile Commuter Priority

Arrow 0.241 0.412 0.231 0.295
Bestmobile 0.034 0.059 0.077 0.057
Commuter 0.724 0.529 0.692 0.649

Step 1
0.295 0.397 0.216 0.908
0.042 + 0.057 + 0.072 = 0.171
0.884 0.511 0.649 2.043

Step 2
0.908 / 0.295 3.082
0.171 / 0.057 = 3.012
2.043 / 0.649 3.150
Step 3
λ max 3.081

Step 4
CI 0.0406

Step 5
RI 0.580
CR 0.070 <= 0.1
The degree of consistency exhibited in the pairwise comparison matrix for style is acceptable.

b. Cost

Cost Arrow Bestmobile Commuter

Arrow 1.000 0.333 3.000
Bestmobile 3.000 1.000 9.000
Commuter 0.333 0.111 1.000
Column Total 4.333 1.444 13.000

Cost Arrow Bestmobile Commuter Priority

Arrow 0.231 0.231 0.231 0.231
Bestmobile 0.692 0.692 0.692 0.692
Commuter 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077

Step 1
0.231 0.231 0.231 0.692
0.692 + 0.692 + 0.692 = 2.077
0.077 0.077 0.077 0.231
Step 2
0.692 / 0.231 3
2.077 / 0.692 = 3
0.231 / 0.077 3

Step 3
λ max 3

Step 4
CI 0

Step 5
RI 0.58
CR 0 ≤ 0.10
So, the degree of consistency exhibited in the pairwise comparison matrix for COST is acceptable.