You are on page 1of 7

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education


PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ELM-490 1/6/2020 4/19/2020


COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________

Gateway Pointe Elementary


COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Arizona
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________

Taylor McBride
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________

Kathleen Miller
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:


EVALUATION 1 TOTAL
POINTS 85 points 85 %
10.00 1000 850 100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide


No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.

High Expectations Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. 1.00
These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 85
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long sets her expectations high for all students. She states her expectations before instruction and once again before students are released to work on the assignment.
The lesson was about graphing. When the students finished the activity provided, they were asked to create their owen data and make a frequency of tally graph.

Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of
the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact
with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and 85 1.00
establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long has built a strong relationship with the students in class as well as other staff members. She is familiar with the students from being on campus for the 2 previous years as the literacy
coach. Her approach to all students shows that she wants all students to learn.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide


No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.

Fairness Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise
fairness in all areas including assessment. 85 1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long has taken over a good part of the grading. When coming across something she is unsure of, she takes the time to think about how a student might have gotten that response and she is
fair in all of her grading. She treats all students with respect.

Professional Conduct Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their
community. 85
Evidence 1.00
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long presents herself as a professional on campus. When there are parent volunteers she goes out of her way to introduce herself and make herself available to assist with anything needed.
The students look up to her in class. Ms. Long has been on this campus as a member of the support staff for 2 years.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide


No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this 1.00
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.

Reflection Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should
be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 80
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long has taken over the afternoon part of the day. She is teaching Lit. Cafe as well as science. She is slowly starting to take over math. After her lessons she talks with Ms. McBride about
what went well and what she can do to improve. This has caused her to change some of her activities that were originally planned, which is a key part of teaching. She is working on her timing
during lessons.

Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00


Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
85
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long has gotten students excited about certain topics because she is providing hands on opportunities. This last week a student came up to Ms. McBride and said they wanted to continue
their own research on light, after Mrs. Long taught her lessons. Ms. Long works well with the team and has taken over the science lessons planning for the team., on light and sound. She will be
creating the lessons for the team, for Social Studies, on Arizona History.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide


No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.

Honesty Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
85 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
The students look up to her and she talks to all students in a loving manner. Ms. Long will be taking part in Parent conference next week.

Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00


Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others
while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 90
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Long has been on this campus for two years. She is familiar with the staff and administration. She has worked well as a member of the support staff. Now she is working as a valued member of
the this grade team.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide


No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.

Advocacy Score No Evidence


Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in
the educational setting. 85 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
According to Ms. McBride, Mrs. Long has taken much time to find great resources for the kids. She finds resources for subjects she hasn’t taken over yet, but she knows will benefit the students
when she does.
She has put together the grade level science plans and helped with team planning for all content areas.
Ms. Long is striving for the best learning environment to meet the needs of the students.
Dedication Score No Evidence
Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
85
1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mrs. Long has put together the grade level science plans and helped with team planning for all content areas.

Mrs. Long has done a great job with her science content that she is teaching. She is starting to take over math. One thing she can work on is thinking about the order of questions and the complexity
to gradually get the students to mastery. This week dealt with telling time, which can be difficult for students. Taking the time to think about what questions to ask first, and the follow ups will help the
flow of the lesson. there were also discussions on elapsed time.

Mrs. Long is working toward a better understanding of the Kagan structures and her uses of Kagan to promote more cooperative learning versus calling on one student at a time.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Melanie Long 20506653


TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.

Total Scored Percentage:


85 %
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:
(Optional)

Attachment 2:
(Optional)

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE


This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty
Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.

I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date


Kathleen Miller
Kathleen Miller (Feb 6, 2020) Feb 6, 2020

You might also like