Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Solution Manual Chemical Engine PDF
Solution Manual Chemical Engine PDF
7 (See Fig. 14.21b). Then x4/tq > 1 ifandonlyif AH < SHG, in accord with the rule of thumb. 14.34 The shape of the solubility curve is characterized in part by the behavior of the derivative dy, /4P (constant 7). A general expression is found from Eq. (14.94), »; = PSP /Fi, where the enhance- ment factor F; depends (at constant T) on P and y;. Thus, #(),-@)2| “BenQ, C59) 3] in (4), 1 ] ap (ain Ae a ay This is a general result. An expression for Fis given by Eq, (14.95) pat Whence, oe PP) exp A RF From this, after some reduction: in Fi) aindy WE (Ch }, -() Rr ( Whence, by Eq. (4), (8)‘This too is a general result. If the two-term virial equation in pressure applics, then Ing, is given by Eg, (11.59), from which: ands 1 aindy 2yabi2P (0B!) = frases we (ORB) = Vix Bu - yu _ 1 dy af RT P SaP RT Whence, by Eq. (B), The denominator of this equation is positive at any pressure level for which Eq. (3.37) is likely to be valid. Hence, the sign of dy, /d P is determined by the sign of the group in parentheses. For very low pressures the 1/P term dominates and dvi /dP is negative. For very high pressures, 1/P is small, and dy;/aP can be positive. If this is the case, then dy /dP is zero for some intermediate pressure, and the solubility yy exhibits a minimum with respect to pressure. Qualitatively, these features are conisistent with the behavior illustrated by Fig. 14.22. However, the two-term virial equation is only valid for low to moderate pressures, and is unable to mimic the change in curvature and “fattening” of the »; vs. P curve observed for high pressures for the naphthalene/CO; system, 14,35 (a) Rewrite the UNILAN equation: =F inie+ Pet) info + Pe] Ca As s+ 0, this expression becomes indeterminate. Application of PHépita’s rule give imn = tim™ (Pe Pew sa" = 807 oe Pet” oF Pee =4( ae “ TNCEP eH or Which is the Langznuir isotherm, () Henry's constant, by definition: — = fim jeury’s constant, by definition; = fim SE dn_m(e e Ditferentiate Eq. (a): “(8 ce a 5 (cine er Pe Whence, 2465) « (©) All derivatives of n with respect to P are well-behaved in the zero-pressure limit: m ™ sinh s dn fim = Zosinhs 61214.36 1437 Bee. Numerical studies show that the UNILAN equation, although providing excellent overall corre- lation of adsorption data at low-to-moderate surface coverage, tends to underestimate Henry's constant Start with Eq. (14.105), written as: ingP/m) =—ink + f'@— 2-1 With 2=148n+Cn?-+--, this becomes: In(P/n) = ~Ink +2Bn + det + Thus a plot of In(P/n) vs. m produces —Ink as the intercept and 2B as the limiting slope (for n> 0), Altemstively, a polynomial curve fit of In(P/m) inm yields —Ink and 2B as the frst two coefficients For species i in a real-gas mixture, Eqs. (11.42) and (11.48) give: bh = UD) + RT inyidyP RT dinydP At constant temperature, aut With dy, uf Eq, (14.101) then becomes: Feat dln + Yxdinysds = 0 (const 7) For pure-gas adsorption, this simplifies to: a fan= (cons FpaadinP+ding (const 7) ey which is the real-gas anslog of Eq. (14,103). On the left side of Eq, (4), introduce the adsorbate compressibility factor through = =: Ta/RT = I14/nRT: a dn gpa a de (8) where n is moles adsorbed. On the right side of Eq. (4), make the substitution: ap ding=@- D> © which follows from Eq. (11.34). Combination of Eqs. (4), (B), and (C) gives on rearrangement (see See. 14.8) ne dn dP ding = 0-9 dee ZS which yields on integration and rearrangement: vairen fe -y'2-o9[ fa This equation is the real-gas analog of Eq, (14.105). 61314,39 & 14.40 Start with Bq. (14.105). With z= (1 —bm)-', one obtains the isotherm: n= EPC — br)exp (- w bn For bn sufficiently small, exp (>) a1 kp Whence, by Bq. (4), © EP(L~ 2bm) eon tee eee T+ 35kP which isthe Langmuir isotherm With 2= 1+ Bn, the adsorption isotherm is: KP exp(—2Bn) from which, for Bn sufficiently small, the Langmuir isotherm is again recovered Adm dP 1441 By Fa, (14.103) with a= A/m, S6H- SE yg, (14.108) with @ = dfn, SEP a WZ The definition of y and its derivative ar: aan and ai Whence, wo @) By general differentiation, » ” n= Hey © ay Pav pet Lge? © The equation, ¥;x; = 1, is an approximation that becomes increasingly accurate asthe solution procedure converges. Thus, by rearrangement of Fg, (B), pe LF, With P fixed, Eq. (C) can now be written in the simple but approximate form: aP @Du=5 Buss Equation (4) then becomes: dyandDx or sy =na( Ex) ‘where we have replaced differentials by deviations. The deviation in J°, x is known, since the true value must be unity, Therefore, i bDn =P -1 ae 61a14.42 1 Leusnsy By Eq, (14.128), Combine the three preceding equations yi PY ae iy = ST _ YS ei/n) P/PS, the Raoult’s law anslogy, is substituted the required equation is reproduced: bye "ee Multiply the given equation for G#/RT by n and convert all mole fractions to mole numbers: ay a ‘Apply Eq. (11.92) for # 1) pam) a tny, = diom (= 22) 4 dim ($= 8) — antat = Ajaa(l — 4) + Ars = x1) = Aaysnxs Introduce solute-free mole fractions: % wd xe te * ‘Whence, day = Aor} — x1)? + Araxs) — x1)? — Ansxdx$ (1 — x1)? Fors 0, ln yf? = Anaes + Aisxs — Aasxixh Apply this equation to the special case of species 1 infinitely dilute in pure solvent 2. In this case, xsl, xh=0, and my = Ai Also Iny = Ais Whence, In yp? = xh 723 4 x5 In yf — Aasxtas |In logarithmic form the equation immediately following Eq, (14.24) on page 536 may be applied to the several infinite-dilution cases: In =n fitiny® — Ay a=InFitiny twas nf +iny?s ‘Whence, In Ay = In fy = x4 (ln Hy 2 — In fi) + 44m Hy 3 — In ft) — Arsxixh or In yin Mia + x4 InAs — Aastix) 61s14.43 For the situation described, Figure 14.11 would have neo regions like the one shown from « to f. probably one on either side of the minimum in curve I. ty aT 1444 By Eq. (14.123) with Py = Vp Incr) Represent in y» by a Taylor series: tnralnno + 222] a ny eines me] ate But at x; = 0 (x2 = 1), both In y and its first derivative are zero. Therefore, 1 (any i ‘ if at di i Also, Ingy Ind =) =x) - 1/@inyg 13 ast ye 1 1 (@loyy at p aa ( as ) od: * Iny Therefore, In(xzy3) = +Inx2 + In» and. B 616Chapter 16 - Section B - Non umerical Solutions 16.1 The potential is displayed as follows. Note that K is used in place of & as a parameter to avoid confusion with Boltzmann’s constant. ‘Combination of the potential with Eq, (16.10) yields on piecewise integration the following expression for B 2 B= aN [4K =H ey PREM 1) BBN og yee tT 4 Reeth From this expression, SF = £5 [-(A? ~ nge¥7 4 (P — K*yee"7] according to which dB/d7 —0 for 7» co and also for an intermediate temperature Ty e+e ol Ge)| ‘That Tr, corresponds to a maximum is readily shown by examination of the second derivative d*B /dT?, 16.2 The table is shown below. Here, contributions to 2 (long range) ate found from Eq, (16.3) [for U(et)}, Bq, (16.4) [for Mind], and Bq, (16.5) [for (disp)}. Note the following: 1, As also seen in Table 16.2, the magnitude of the dispersion interaction in all cases is substantial 2. U(el), henec fe!), is identically zero unless both species in a molecular pair have non-zero permanent dipole moments, 3. As seen for several of the examples, the fractional contribution of induction forces ean be sub- stantial for unlike molecular pairs. Roughly: (ind) is larger, the greater the difference in polarity of the interacting species. 617Molecular Pair = Cg/10- Jm® fel) find) f(disp) fed F(disp) CHUCHH ig 498 oo 1000 0 CHyYCHCh 343 0 0,008 0.992 a CHa(CHs).CO 249 0 0088 0.912 8 CHYUCH,CN 2.1 0 0188 0812 ° GHeCHCh 161.9 0 0008 0.992 0 CHHye(CHS):CO 119.1 0 0096 0.904 8 CHyg/CH3CN 106.1 0 0.205 0.795 0 CHCly/(CH3)2CO 95.0 0.143 0.087 0.770 0.186 CHC1;/CH3CN. 983 0.263 0.151 0,586 0.450 (CH)COICHSCN 27030805. 0.052 0.142——5.680 16.3, Water (#,0), a highly polar hydrogen donor and acceptor, is the common species forall four systems; in all four cases, it experiences strong attractive interactions with the second species. Here, interactions between unlike molecular pairs are stronger then interactions between pairs of molecules of the same kind, and therefore A is negative. (Sec the discussion of signs for H in Sec. 16.7.) 16.4 Of the eight potential combinations of signs, two are forbidden by Eq. (16.25). Suppose that H® is negative and $® is positive, Then, by Eq. (16.25), G* must be negative: the sign combination G¥ @, H® 9, and S® @ is outlawed, Similar reasoning shows that the combination G® ©, H® @, and S© © is inconsistent with Eq. (16.25). All other combinations are possible in principle. 16.5 In Series A, hydrogen bonding occurs between the donor hydrogens of CHCl: and the electron-rich benzene molecule. In series B, a charge-transfer complex ocours between acetone and the aromatic benzene molecule. Neither cyclohexane nor n-hexane offers the opportunity for these special salvation interactions, Hence the mixtures containing benzene have more negative (smaller positive) values of H® than those containing cyclohexane and n-hexane. (See Secs. 16.5 and 16.6.) 16.6 (a) Acetone/eyclohexane is an NAINP systeon; one expects G¥ ®, H® ©, and S® &. (®) Acetoneidichloromethane is a solveting NA/NA mixture. Here, without question, one will see GF 6, H® 2, and S¥ 8, (©) Aniline/eyctohexane is an AS/NP mixture. Here, we expect either Region I or Region II behavior: GF @ and H® ©, with SF @ or. [At 323 K (50°C), experiment shows that S® is @ for this system] (A) Benzene/carbon disulfide is an NP/NP system, We therefore expect G* &, H® ©, and S* @, (©) Benzenetn-hexane is NP/NP. Hence, G* @, H® ©, and S® @. (A) Chloroform/i,4-dioxane is a solvating NA/NA mixture. Hence, G® ©, H® ©, and S® ©. (2) Chloroforin/a-hexane is NA/NP. Hence, G® @, H® @, and S* ©, (A) Bthanol/n-nonane is an AS/NP mixture, and ethanol is a very strong associator. Hence, we expect Region Il behavior: G* @, H® ®, and S® 6. 16,7 By definition, 2[By —$(6u+By)] At normal temperature levels, intermolecular attractions prevail and the second vial oeticents are negative. (See Sec. 16.2 for a discussion of the connection between intermolecular forces and the second virial coefficient) ITinterations between unlike molecvar pairs are weaker than interactions between pairs of molecules of the same kind, Byl < HB + By| 618and hence (since each B is negative) 4; > 0. Ifunlike interactions are stronger than like interactions, [Byl > HB + Byl and hence 6 <0. [interactions are identical for all molecular pairs, By = Bu = By and by =0 ‘The rationalizations of signs for H of binary liquid mixtures presented in See. 16.7 apply approxi mately tothe signs of 2 for binary gas mixtures, Thus, postive isthe norm for NP/NP, NAJNP, and ASINP mixtures, whereas diz is usually negative for NA/NA mixtures comprising solvating species One expects 612 to be essentially zero for ideal solutions of real gases, e.g, for binary gas mixtures of the isomeric xylenes 619