INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: VIRGIE G. OLANO Name of Rater: MARY HOPE J. GABINETE

Position: Teacher III Position: Principal I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/MIMAROPA Region/Division of Puerto Princesa City/Tiniguiban ES Date of Review: ___________________
Rating Period: 2018-2019
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 1 QET PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs ACTUAL RESULTS
Content Knowledge and Pedagogy Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. Applied knowledge June, 2018 22.5% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No
of content within and to knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of acceptable
across curriculum April, 2019 (7.5% content and content and content and content and its evidence
teaching areas per its its its integration was
objective) integration integration integration within shown
within and within and within and and across
across subject across across subject areas as
areas as subject areas subject areas shown in MOV
shown in as shown as shown 1with a rating
MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 in MOV 1 of 4
rating of 7 with a rating with a rating
of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 lessons using lessons using 1 of the given acceptable
lessons MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV evidence
using MOV 1 supported by supported by was
and any 1 of the any 1 of the shown
supported other given other given
by any 1 of MOV MOV
the other
given MOV
Timeliness Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted MOV No
MOV were MOV were MOV were was completed acceptable
distributed distributed distributed in only 1 evidence
across 4 across 3 across 2 quarter was
quarters quarters quarters shown
TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 1
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Content Knowledge and Pedagogy ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
2. Used a range of June, 2018 22.5% Quality Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No
teaching strategies to using using using using acceptable
that enhance learner April, 2019 (7.5% different different different different evidence
achievement in per teaching teaching teaching teaching was
literacy and objective) strategies strategies strategies strategies that shown
numeracy skills. that that that promote
promote promote promote reading, writing
reading, reading, reading, and/or
writing writing writing numeracy skills
and/or and/or and/or as shown in
numeracy numeracy numeracy MOV 1 with a
skills as skills skills rating of 4
shown as shown in as shown in
in MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
a rating of 6 rating of 5
rating of 7
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 Learner- learner- learner- acceptable
learner centered centered centered evidence
centered- lessons as lessons as lesson as was
lessons as evidently evidently evidently shown
evidently shown in shown shown
shown MOV in MOV 1 and in any of the
in MOV 1 and 1 and supported by given MOV
supported by supported by any 1 of the
any 1 of the any 1 of the other MOV
other MOV other MOV given
given given
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 1
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Content Knowledge and Pedagogy ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
3. Applied a range of June, 2018 22.5% Quality Used different Used Used Used different No
teaching strategies to to teaching different different teaching acceptable
develop critical and April, 2019 (7.5% strategies teaching teaching strategies that evidence
creative thinking, as per that strategies strategies develop critical was
well as other higher- objective) develop that that and creative shown
order thinking skills. critical develop develop thinking and/or
and creative critical critical other HOTS as
thinking and creative and creative shown in MOV
and/or thinking thinking 1 with a rating
other HOTS and/or and/or of 4
as shown in other HOTS other HOTS
MOV 1 as shown in as shown in
with a rating MOV MOV
of 7 1 with a 1 with a
rating rating
of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
lessons evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
as evidenced MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the was
by MOV 1 and supported by supported by given MOV shown
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 2
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Learning Environment and Diversity of ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Learners
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
4. Managed June, 2018 22.5% Quality Used Used Used Used classroom No
classroom structure to classroom classroom classroom management acceptable
to engage learners, April, 2019 (7.5% management management management strategies that evidence
individually or in per strategies strategies strategies engage learners was
groups, in meaningful objective) that that that in shown
exploration, engage engage engage activities/tasks
discovery and hands- learners learners in learners as shown in
on activities within a in activities/tas in MOV 1 with a
range of physical activities/tas ks activities/tas rating of 4
learning ks as shown in ks
environments. as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons lessons lesson acceptable
lessons supported by supported by supported by evidence
supported by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the was
MOV 1 and any 1 of the any 1 of the acceptable MOV shown
any 1 of the other other
other acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 2
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Learning Environment and Diversity of ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Learners
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
5. Managed learner June, 2018 22.5% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied teacher No
behavior to teacher teacher teacher management acceptable
constructively by April, 2019 (7.5% management management management strategies of evidence
applying positive and per strategies of strategies of strategies of learner was
non-violent discipline objective) learner learner learner behavior shown
to ensure learning- behavior behavior that behavior that promote
focused that promote promote that promote positive and
environments. positive and positive and positive and non-violent
non-violent non-violent non-violent discipline as
discipline as discipline as discipline as shown in MOV
shown in shown in shown in submitted with
MOV MOV MOV a rating of 4
submitted submitted submitted
with a rating with a rating with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any No
least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the 1 of the given acceptable
given given given strategies as evidence
strategies strategies strategies observed in was
as observed as observed as observed only 1 lesson shown
in at least 4 in 3 lessons in 2 lessons
lessons
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 2
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Learning Environment and Diversity of ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Learners
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
6. Used June, 2018 22.5% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
differentiated, to differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
developmentally April, 2019 (7.5% teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
appropriate learning per strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was
experiences to objective) address address address address learner shown
address learners’ learner learner learner diversity as
gender, needs, diversity as diversity as diversity as shown in MOV
strengths, interests shown in shown in shown in 1 with a rating
and experiences. MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a of 4
rating of 7 rating rating
of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 differentiated differentiated 1 differentiated acceptable
differentiated teaching teaching teaching evidence
teaching strategies in strategies in strategy in only was
strategies in at least 2 2 lessons as 1 lesson as shown
at least 2 lessons evidenced by evidently
lessons as evidenced MOV 1 and shown
as evidenced by MOV 1 supported by in any 1 of the
by MOV 1 and and any 1 of the acceptable MOV
supported by supported by other
any 1 of the any 1 of the acceptable
other other MOV
acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 3
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Curriculum and Planning ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
7. Planned, managed June, 2018 22.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
and implemented to implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
developmentally April, 2019 (7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
sequenced teaching per sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced was
and learning objective) teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
processes to meet learning learning learning learning
curriculum process process as process as process
requirements and as shown in shown in shown in as shown in
varied teaching MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
contexts. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was
teaching and learning learning learning shown
learning process as process as process
process evidently evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in shown in shown in any 1
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the given
MOV 1 and supported by supported by MOV
supported any 1 of the any 1 of the
by any 1 of other given other given
the other MOV MOV
given MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 3
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Curriculum and Planning ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
8. Participated in June, 2018 22.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collegial discussions to participated participated participated participated in acceptable
that use teacher and April, 2019 (7.5% in LACs/ in LACs/ in LACs/ LAC/FGD/ evidence
learner feedback to per FGDs/ FGDs/ FGDs/ meeting to was
enrich teaching objective) meetings to meetings to meetings to discuss shown
practice.. discuss discuss discuss teacher/learner
teacher/ teacher/ teacher/ feedback to
learner learner learner enrich
feedback to feedback to feedback to instruction as
enrich enrich enrich shown in the
instruction as instruction instruction as MOV submitted
shown in the as shown in shown in the
MOV the MOV MOV
submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Participated Participated Participated Participated in No
in at least 4 in 3 LACs/ in 2 LACs/ 1 LAC/FGD/ acceptable
LACs/FGDs/ FGDs/ FGDs/ meeting as evidence
meetings as meetings as meetings as evidently was
evidently evidently evidently shown shown
shown shown in any shown in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the 1 of the given in any 1 of given MOV
given MOV MOV the given
MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 3
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Curriculum and Planning ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
9. Selected, June, 2018 22.5% Quality Developed Developed Developed Developed and No
developed, organized to and used and used and used used varied acceptable
and used appropriate April, 2019 (7.5% varied varied varied teaching and evidence
teaching and learning per teaching and teaching and teaching and learning was
resources, including objective) learning learning learning resources, shown
ICT, to address resources, resources, resources, including ICT,
learning goals. including ICT, including including ICT, to address
to address ICT, to to address learning
learning address learning goals as shown
goals as learning goals as in MOV 1 with a
shown goals as shown in rating of 4
in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with a
a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 5
rating of 6
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 varied varied varied teaching and acceptable
teaching and teaching teaching learning evidence
learning and learning and learning resource, was
resources, resources, resources, including ICT, shown
including ICT, including including ICT, as evidently
as evidently ICT, as as evidently shown in any of
shown in evidently shown in the
MOV 1 and shown in MOV acceptable MOV
supported by MOV 1 and 1 and
any 1 of the supported by supported
acceptable any 1 of the by any 1 of
MOV acceptable the
MOV acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 4
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Assessment and Reporting ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
10. Designed, June, 2018 22.5% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
selected, organized to selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
and used diagnostic, April, 2019 (7.5% organized and organized organized organized and evidence
formative and per used and used and used used diagnostic, was
summative objective) diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, formative and shown
assessment formative and formative formative summative
strategies consistent summative and and assessment
with curriculum assessment summative summative strategies
requirements strategies assessment assessment consistent with
consistent strategies strategies curriculum
with consistent consistent requirements
curriculum with with as shown in
requirements curriculum curriculum MOV 1 with a
as shown in requirements requirements rating of 4
MOV 1 with a as shown in as shown in
rating of 7 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 6 rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool acceptable
assessment assessment assessment as evidently evidence
tools as tools as tools as shown in any of was
evidently evidently evidently the acceptable shown
shown in any shown in any shown in any MOV
1 of the 1 of the 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 4
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Assessment and Reporting ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
11. Monitored and June, 2018 22.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
evaluated learner to monitored monitored monitored monitored and acceptable
progress and April, 2019 (7.5% and and and evaluated evidence
achievement using per evaluated evaluated evaluated learner was
learner attainment objective) learner learner learner progress shown
data. progress progress and progress and
and achievement and achievement
achievement using learner achievement using learner
using learner attainment using learner attainment data
attainment data as attainment as shown in the
data as shown shown in the data as MOV submitted
in the MOV MOV shown in the
submitted submitted MOV
submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination combination combination acceptable MOV acceptable
of at least 4 of of 3 of the of 2 of the evidence
the acceptable acceptable was
acceptable MOV MOV shown
MOV
Timeliness Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted MOV No
MOV MOV were MOV was completed acceptable
were distributed were in only 1 evidence
distributed across 3 distributed quarter was
across 4 quarters across 2 shown
quarters quarters

TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 4
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Assessment and Reporting ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
12. Communicated June, 2018 22.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No
promptly and clearly to showed showed showed prompt and acceptable
the learners’ needs, April, 2019 (7.5% prompt and prompt prompt clear evidence
progress and per clear and clear and clear communication was
achievement to key objective) communicati communicati communicati of the learners’ shown
stakeholders, on of the on of the on of the needs, progress
including learners’ learners’ learners’ and
parents/guardians. needs, needs, needs, achievement to
progress progress and progress key
and achievement and stakeholders,
achievement to key achievement including
to key stakeholders, to key parents/
stakeholders, including stakeholders, guardians as
including parents/ including shown in the
parents/ guardians as parents/ MOV submitted
guardians as shown in the guardians as
shown in the MOV shown in the
MOV submitted MOV
submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any No
combination combination combination 1 of the given acceptable
of at least 4 of of 3 of the of 2 of the MOV evidence
the acceptable acceptable was
acceptable MOV MOV shown
MOV
Timeliness Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted MOV No
MOV were MOV were MOV were was completed acceptable
distributed distributed distributed in only 1 evidence
across 4 across 3 across 2 quarter was
quarters quarters quarters shown
TOTAL
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN
DURING EVALUATION
KRA 5
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Plus Factor ACTUAL RESULTS
QET Very
Weight Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RATING AVE SCORE
Objectives Timeline Per KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
13. Performed June, 2018 22.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
various related to performed performed performed performed acceptable
works/activities that April, 2019 (7.5% various various various various related evidence
contribute to the per related related related work/activities was
teaching-learning objective) work/ work/ work/ that contribute shown
process. activities that activities that activities that to the teaching
contribute to contribute contribute learning
the teaching to the to the process
learning teaching teaching as shown in the
process as learning learning MOV submitted
shown in the process as process as
MOV shown in the shown in the
submitted MOV MOV
submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 different different 1 of the acceptable
different kinds kinds acceptable MOV evidence
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable was
acceptable MOV MOV shown
MOV
Timeliness
TOTAL
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

MARY HAOPE J. GABINETE VIRGIE G. OLANO _____________________________

Rater Ratee Approving Authority