Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: S. Kaleemullah & R. Kailappan (2005) Latent Heat of Vaporization of Moisture
from Red Chillies, International Journal of Food Properties, 8:2, 199-205
S. Kaleemullah
Department of Agricultural Engineering, SV Agricultural College, Tirupati, India
R. Kailappan
Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricul-
tural University, Coimbatore, India
A method to develop a model for latent heat of vaporization of moisture in red chillies was
developed from moisture isotherm data. The latent heat of vaporization of moisture in red
chillies was high at low moisture contents and low at high moisture contents. The moisture
inside the chillies behaved almost like free water when the moisture content of chillies was
above 150% (dry basis). The developed model is useful in determining the total latent heat
of vaporization of moisture in chillies within the moisture limits of 400-5% d.b.
INTRODUCTION
Red chillies are the dried ripe fruits of the species of genus Capsicum. Chillies,
which contain a high moisture content (300-400% d.b.) after harvest, are highly perishable
and hence processing and storage of chillies are of considerable importance both to farm-
ers as well as to processors and consumers. Reducing the moisture content and providing
aeration to the chillies after harvesting is essential to avoid development of microflora and
subsequent loss of quality or even total spoilage.[1] Therefore, chillies need to be dried
quickly without impairing colour and pungency.
Information about the amount of heat energy required to vaporize moisture from
chillies during the drying process is important for the proper design of a dryer. The latent
heat of vaporization of moisture in fruits or vegetables is often determined by considering
the evaporation of free water as given in steam tables. The use of such data, especially at
low moisture contents, leads to considerable error in drying energy calculations. At high
moisture contents, the moisture inside the fruits or vegetables behaves almost like free
water, which can be removed with relative ease. However, at lower moistures, it is
strongly bound by physical and chemical forces.[2]
The binding of moisture inside food material is due to adsorption, a surface phenome-
non, though other factors such as capillary, solution, and chemical binding are also possible.[3]
199
200 KALEEMULLAH AND KAILAPPAN
Because the food material is a hygroscopic, it exhibits a vapor pressure less than that of
free water at the same temperature and, therefore, the heat energy required to vaporize
moisture from food material would be higher than that of free water.[4] The energy
required to evaporate moisture from grain especially at low moisture content is higher
than that of free water and depends on the type of crop.[5] The latent heat of vaporization
of the product can be determined from the equilibrium moisture content data.[6,7]
In simulation studies of a dryer, the total latent heat of vaporization of moisture at a
given chilli bed temperature and moisture range is frequently needed. Since at each layer
of chillies bed the temperature and moisture content vary with time, a model for total
latent heat of vaporization of moisture in chillies in terms of moisture range and tempera-
ture will be useful. In the present study, a systematic approach to develop such a model for
total latent heat of vaporization of moisture in chillies was adopted which can be extended
to any food material. Regression equations were developed for latent heat of vaporization
of moisture from brown parboiled rice,[2] wheat,[6] malt,[7] shelled corn, [8] soybean,[9] and
alfalfa pellets.[10]
dpv L (1)
=
dT (vv − vl )T
At normal temperature and pressure, the specific volume of liquid can be considered to
be negligible compared to the specific volume of vapor. By assuming the vapor
behaves like an ideal gas, the following equation is derived after following the known
procedure:[11]
Lc
ln( pv ) = ln( pvs ) + C (2)
L
The vapor pressure of moisture in chillies at each moisture content was calculated as:
To determine the latent heat of vaporization of moisture present in the chillies, an equi-
librium relative humidity data was generated within a moisture content of 400-5% d.b.
using a modified Oswin formula, which was proved to be the best for describing the
desorption of chillies:[12]
1 (4)
ERH =
(a + bt )c
+1
M
LATENT HEAT OF VAPORIZATION OF MOISTURE FROM RED CHILLIES 201
The calculated values of pv and pvs at the same equilibrium moisture contents were
then plotted on logarithmic scales. The slopes of the resulting straight lines were deter-
mined to give the latent heat of vaporization ratio (Lc/L). An equation was developed to
describe the latent heat of vaporization ratio as a function of moisture content. A model
was also developed to determine the total latent heat of vaporization of moisture in chillies
within the moisture limits of 400-5% d.b.
Table 1 Equilibrium relative humidity (ERH) and actual pressure of water vapor (pv) in chillies at different
moisture contents and temperatures
400 0.994 0.994 0.995 0.995 0.996 3.150 4.225 5.601 7.346 9.552
350 0.992 0.993 0.994 0.994 0.995 3.145 4.220 5.594 7.339 9.543
300 0.990 0.991 0.992 0.993 0.994 3.139 4.212 5.585 7.329 9.531
250 0.987 0.988 0.990 0.991 0.992 3.129 4.200 5.571 7.311 9.512
200 0.982 0.984 0.985 0.987 0.989 3.112 4.180 5.547 7.284 9.481
150 0.972 0.975 0.978 0.980 0.983 3.082 4.143 5.503 7.233 9.422
100 0.950 0.954 0.959 0.964 0.968 3.010 4.056 5.400 7.112 9.284
75 0.924 0.931 0.938 0.945 0.951 2.929 3.958 5.282 6.973 9.124
50 0.868 0.880 0.891 0.903 0.914 2.752 3.739 5.018 6.661 8.763
25 0.697 0.719 0.741 0.764 0.787 2.209 3.055 4.173 5.639 7.550
20 0.621 0.646 0.671 0.698 0.725 1.969 2.744 3.779 5.149 6.954
15 0.515 0.541 0.569 0.599 0.630 1.631 2.298 3.203 4.418 6.045
10 0.364 0.389 0.416 0.446 0.480 1.155 1.653 2.344 3.295 4.600
5 0.167 0.182 0.200 0.220 0.244 0.529 0.773 1.123 1.623 2.336
202 KALEEMULLAH AND KAILAPPAN
1.4
Actual values
predicted values
Latent heat of vapourization ratio (Lc/L )
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0 100 200 300 400
400 1.0022
350 1.0027
300 1.0034
250 1.0045
200 1.0063
150 1.0096
100 1.0174
75 1.0264
50 1.0463
25 1.1102
20 1.1400
15 1.1836
10 1.2488
5 1.3421
LATENT HEAT OF VAPORIZATION OF MOISTURE FROM RED CHILLIES 203
free water. A relationship between the latent heat of vaporization of moisture ratio and the
equilibrium moisture content can be expressed by the following expression:
with a R2 value of 0.99. The total latent heat of vaporization of moisture from chillies,
Lc( M1 to M2 ) within a moisture range of M1 and M2 can be determined by using the follow-
ing formula:
M − M2
Lc( M1 to M2 ) = (Wt. of bone dry material of chillies) 1
100 c
L (7)
M − M2
Lc( M1 to M2 ) = Wb 1
100
(1 + 0.439107e(−0.055122 M ) ) L (8)
M2
dM
∫ Wb 100 (1 + 0.439107e
( −0.055122 M )
Lc( M1 to M2 ) = )L (9)
M1
Substituting the values of M1 (more value) and M2 (less value) resulted in a negative value
for Lc( M to M ) , which implies the heat requirement to vaporize the moisture from chillies.
1 2
Hence, it is multiplied with –1 to get a positive quantity of Lc ( M to M ) .
1 2
M
−Wb L 2
∴ Lc ( M1 to M2 ) = M 7.96609e( −0.055122 M ) (10)
100 M1
Equation (10) is useful in determining the total latent heat of vaporization of moisture
from chillies within the moisture limits of 400-5% d.b.
CONCLUSIONS
The latent heat of vaporization of moisture from red chillies was high at low mois-
ture contents and low at high moisture contents. The moisture inside the chillies behaved
almost like free water when the moisture content of chillies was above 150% d.b. The
developed model is useful in determining the total latent heat of vaporization of moisture
in chillies within the moisture limits of 400-5% d.b.
NOMENCLATURE
a,b,c dimensionless coefficients
C constant of integration
ERH equilibrium relative humidity, decimal
L latent heat of vaporization of free moisture, kJ/kg
Lc latent heat of vaporization of moisture from chillies, kJ/kg
Lc( M1 to M2 ) total latent heat of vaporization of moisture from chillies within a moisture range
of M1 and M2, kJ
M equilibrium moisture content, % d.b.
M1 moisture content of fresh chillies, % d.b.
M2 moisture content of dried chillies, % d.b.
pv actual pressure of water vapor (kPa)
pvs saturation pressure of water vapor (kPa)
t temperature, °C
T absolute temperature, K
vl specific volume of liquid, m3/kg
vv specific volume of vapor, m3/kg
Wb weight of bone dry material of chillies, kg
REFERENCES
1. Singh, H.; Alam, A. Techno-economic study on chilli drying. J. Agr. Eng. 1982, 19 (1), 27–32.
2. Palanimuthu, V.; Chattopadhyay, P.K. Prediction of heat of vaporization of moisture from
cereal grains – A modelling approach. Drying Technol. 1993, 11, 1855–1862.
3. Henderson, S.M. A basic concept of equilibrium moisture. Agr. Eng. 1952, 33, 29–32.
4. Lal, R.; Agarwal, K.K. Principles and Practices of Rice Drying;. In Dept. Agrl. Eng. Indian
Institute of Tecnology: Kharagpur, India, 1968, 54.
5. Bala, B.K. Drying and Storage of Cereal Grains. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.: New Delhi,
India, 1997, 63.
6. Gallaher, G.L. A method of determining the latent heat of agricultural crops. Agr. Eng. 1951,
32, 34–38.
7. Bala, B.K.; Woods, J.L. Simulation of deep bed malt drying. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 1984, 30, 235–244.
8. Strohman, R.D.; Yoerger, R.R. A new equilibrium moisture content equation. Trans. ASAE
1967, 10 (5), 675–677.
9. Alam, A.; Shove, G.C. Hygroscopicity and thermal properties of soybeans. Trans. ASAE 1973,
16 (4), 707–709.
10. Fasina, O.O.; Sokhansanj, S. Equilibrium moisture relations and heat of sorption of alfalfa pel-
lets. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 1993, 56, 51–63.
LATENT HEAT OF VAPORIZATION OF MOISTURE FROM RED CHILLIES 205
11. Othmer, D.F. Correlating vapor pressure and latent heat data. J. Industrial Eng. Chem. 1940, 32,
841–856.
12. Kaleemullah, S. Moisture sorption isotherms of red chillies. Biosystems Eng. 2004, 88 (1),
95–104.
13. Cenkowski, S.; Jayas, D.S.; Hao, D. Latent heat of vaporization for selected foods and crops.
Canadian Agr. Eng. 1992, 34, 281–286.
14. ASAE. Psychrometric Data. In Standards 1992, 39th Ed.; ASAE: St. Joseph, Michigan, USA,
1992, 4–11.