STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT

Authorised
Client Details: Ref no: N/A
Signature & Logo
Owners Name:
Adress: Itahari 06

Building Type: Mixed type(Residential & Commercial)

Date of Submission: Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Authorised
Submitted By: Ref No:
Signature & Logo
Consultancy Firm:
Address: Itahari 6
Designers’ Name:
Nepal Engineering Council No:

Submitted to Reg No: Authorised

Signature & Logo
Office of the Municipal Executive :
Itahari Submetropolitan City

Itahari Sunsari
 Itahari SubMetropolitan
Office of The Municipal Executive
Department of building Permit and Implementation of By laws
Itahari Sunsari
NBC Compliance Check list on Structural Analysis & Design for RCC

S.No Description Quantity Unit Adopted Remarks

Code

A General Information:
A.1 Owner’s Name: -
Address: Itahari 06
A.3 Type of Building: Mixed type(Residential & Commercial)
A.4 Structural Designed By:
Consultancy Firm: -
Designers’ Name: -
Nepal Engineering Council No: -

B Geometrical Configuration of Building:

B.1 No. of Block: Single
B.2 No. of Story: 5 storeys
B.3 Story Height:
Basment Floor 0.000 m
Ground Floor 3.175 m
First Floor 3.175 m
Second Floor 3.175 m
Third Floor 3.175 m
Fouth Floor 3.175 m
Staircase Cover 3.175 m
B.4 Total height of structure: 19.050 m
B.5 No. of columns: 19
B.6 No. of Lift: Not Applicable 0
B.7 No. of staircase: Applicable 1
B.8 Seismic joints if any: Not Applicable
B.9 Centre of Mass:
B.10 Centre of Rigidity:
B.11 Eccentricity/Permissible eccentricity:

C Geological Investigation:
i) Geological Investigation Conducted yes
If Yes
C.1 Soil Investigation Report:
C.2 Soil Investigation Done By: Agni Boring and Soil Test Pvt Ltd
C.3 Allowable Bearing Capacity: 79.46 KN/m2
C.4 N- value: 13
C.5 Type of Soil: Type III (Soft Soil)
C.6 Water Table: 1.63m
C.7 Liquefaction Potential:
 Itahari SubMetropolitan
Office of The Municipal Executive
Department of building Permit and Implementation of By laws
Itahari Sunsari
NBC Compliance Check list on Structural Analysis & Design for RCC

S.No Description Quantity Unit Adopted Remarks

Code
C.8 Calculated Maximum Pressure in
Foundation:
If No No
C.9 Adopted Value as per NBC 205 Table
3.1 00 KN/m2
C.10 Site Consideration as per NBC 108? Yes

D Structural Analysis and Design Procedure:

D.1 Structural Analysis Software:(version) Etabs V15
D.2 Structural System: R.C.C Moment Resisting Frame
D.3 Foundation System: Mat Foundation
D.4 Loading Parameters:
i. Dead Load: As Per IS 875 (Part 1): Code of Practice for Design Load Refer Report
ii. Live Load: As Per IS 875 (Part-II)-1987 specifies the live loads Refer Report
D.5 Concrete Grade Used : M20 Column
M20 Foundation, Beam, Slab
D.6 Reinforcement Grade Used: Fe 500 Beam,Column,Foundation & Slab
Reinforcement Grade Used for shear: Fe 500 Beam,Column,Foundation & Slab
D.7 Unit Weight Of Materials

i. Brick 18.0 KN/m2

ii. Brick Wall 20.0 KN/m2
iii. Concrete 24.993 KN/m2
iv. Rebar 76.97 KN/m2
D.8 Seismic Load (AS per NBC105 or
IS 1893:2002) :-
D.8.1 Zone Factor (Z): 0.36
D.8.2 Importance Factor(I): 1
D.8.3 Soil Type: Type III (Soft Soil)
Total height of Building 19.050 m
D.8.4 Fundamental Time Period 0.684 Sec
D.8.5 Response Reduction Factor (R): 5
D.8.6 Seismic Coefficient
D.8.7 Seismic Weight:
D.8.8 Design Seismic Base Shear
D.8.9 Base Shear from Dynamic Analysis
Rx=
Ry=
D.9.0 Total Deflection of Building:
Actual Calculated permissible <0.004 times the storey height,
 Itahari SubMetropolitan
Office of The Municipal Executive
Department of building Permit and Implementation of By laws
Itahari Sunsari
NBC Compliance Check list on Structural Analysis & Design for RCC

S.No Description Quantity Unit Adopted Remarks

Code
i. Along X-direction: 76 mm
ii. Along Y-Direction: 76 mm
Actual Calculated permissible <0.004 times the storey height,
D.9.1 Inter Story Deflection (Drift):
D.9.2 Separation Between blocks if any: No
D.9.3 Load Combination Considered: ( IS 1893:2002)

E. Reinforced Concrete Design

E.1 Concrete Design code Referred: (IS456:2000 And Nepal National Building
E.2 Ductile Detailing code Referred: Code)
(IS13920:1993)

F Attachments:
H.1 Application form
H.2 Structural Design Report
H.3 Detailed Architectural Drawings
H.4 Detailed Structural Drawings
H.5 CD of Structural Analysis

I hearby Declare that the Above Data and Information are True and Are according To Nepal Building Code,Indian Code and
Prevailing International Codes.

…………………… ……………………..
Signature Signature
- -
Owner’s Name: Designer’s Name:
 DECLARATION
Reference No: ________

The Department Head

Itahari Submetropolitan City
Office of the Municipal Executive :
Itahari Sunsari
Dear Sir,
We are submitting herewith the structural analysis and design report of Mixed type(Residential & Commercial)Building
The data and design "information furnished are true to the best of our knowledge and we have physically inspected,
measured & verified it.
I hereby cetrify that this building is safe in all respects as per the design and specifications included in this report

All necessary calculations and documents are attached herewith for ready reference and record.

Yours faithfully,

-
-
Itahari 6
1.Introduction
1.1 About this Report

This report has been prepared for the purpose of Design Approval and submission
to Itahari Submetropolitan City This report deals about a Mixed Type Building at
itahari submetropolitan ward no 06 .This Report has been prepared by dedicated
team of our firm under the guidance of experiance Eengineer. This report deals
with methodology of the structural analysis and design of a Building and its
results. This report includes different parameters for the analysis and design of the
structure. The design results are shown in a very convenient tabular format in the
report.The results of calculation are presented in tabular form and sample
calculations are provided in details to reduce the bulkiness of the report. Sufficient
figure and sketches have been introduced to illustrate the theories. Reference to
the appropriate clauses of standard codes of practices has been made wherever
necessary. It is clear that for understanding the process physically and realizing
the structure behaviour, manual steps by steps procedure is necessary. However
due to the time constraint and to be familiar to the modern technology.

1.2.Objective
* To achieve a practical knowledge on structural analysis, design and detailing of
structural components using principles of Earthquake resistant design
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:

* Modeling of the building for structural analysis.

* Sectional design and structural detailing of the members.

1.3 Analysis procedure

The structure has been modelled, analysed and designed in a computer software
“ETABS 2015 Advanced version”. The software has very good analysis and design
capability which are verified in the verification problems included in the package. It
is a Finite Element Method (FEM) based software and requires modelling of the
structure by finite-elements. Beams and columns are modelled with line (or frame)
elements, while the slabs and roofs are modelled with area-elements. This project
enabled us to acquire knowledge on proper analysis and design of building for
earthquake safety including the capability of solving and tackling the field problem
to somewhat. It has taught us to work in team which will surely help us in the
future to come.
 1.4. Brief Description of the Building.
Building Type : Mixed type(Residential & Commercial)
Location : Itahari 06
Owner : -
No of Storey : 5 storeys
Foundation Type : Mat Foundation
Beams Material Concrete Rectangular

Bm(12*18) M20 Concrete Rectangular

Bm(12x18) M20 Concrete Rectangular
Bm(15x5) M20 Concrete Rectangular
Column
C(12x12) M20 Concrete Rectangular
C(15*15) M20 Concrete Rectangular
C(18*18) M20 Concrete Rectangular
Slabs : 125 mm
Staircase : 150 mm thick waist slab"
Walls : Non-load bearing brick walls
Structural System : RCC Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
Soil Type : Type III (Soft Soil)
Bearing Capacity : 79.460 KN/m2
Soil Report Available? : Yes

1.5 Materials Property

TABLE: Material Properties - Summary
Name Type E ν Unit Weight Design Strengths
MPa kN/m³
HYSD500 Rebar 200000 0 76.9729 Fy=500 MPa, Fu=545 MPa
M20 Concrete 22360.68 0.2 24.9926 Fc=20 MPa
1.6 Design Basis
The building is designed following the standard codes and norms. The different

codes used for the structural design are

i. IS456:2000 [Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete] for
Design of Concrete Structures.
ii. IS1893:2002 [Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure] for

Earthquake load calculation.

iii. IS875:1987 [Code of practice for design loads (other than

earthquake) for buildings and structures] for Other Load calculation.

 iv. SP16:1980 [Design aids for reinforced concrete to IS456:1978] for

detailing of the structural members.

v. IS13920:1993 [Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures

subjected to seismic forces] for Ductile Detailing of the structural members.

2. Loading
All loadings are derived bases on different parts of IS875. Earthquake load is

calculated based on IS1893:2000.

2.1 Dead Loads (DL)
These are the permanent load which is not supposed to change during the

structure’s design life. The dead loads included in the design are:
With 40%
Full Load With 25% opening With 30% opening
opening
S.n Description
Load Load Load
Height Load Height Height Height
KN/m KN/m KN/m

1
Full Brick
2.68 14.18 2.75 10.90 2.75 10.20 2.75 8.75
Wall

2
1/2 Brick Wall 2.68 7.49 2.75 5.75 2.75 5.39 2.75 4.62

Marble
Bottom
Slab Only Screed Only Marble Only &
plaster
Sn Description screed
Load Load Thickne Load Load Load
Width Width
KN/m2 KN/m2 ss KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
1
Slab 0.125 3.125 0.038 0.912 0.012 0.312 1.224 0.24

1
Staircase 0.15 3.75 0.038 0.912 0.012 0.312 1.224 0.24

2.2 Live Loads (LL)

These are the loads that may vary its intensity and/or position during design life.

Live loads for different rooms and roofs are calculated as per the functional

requirement as specified in IS875 code.

Live loads on floors : i. Staircase: 4 KN/m2
: ii. Accessible roof: 1.5 KN/m2
: iii. Overall 6 KN/m2
2.3 Earthquake Loads (EL)

As per IS 1893-2002 Summary Report from Etabs calculation attached with this
Report
TABLE: Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2002

Load Eccent Bottom Soil Period Coeff Weight Base

Pattern Type Direction ricity Period Method User T Top Story Story Z Type I R Used Used Used Shear
% sec sec kN kN
Ex Seismic X User Specified 0.684 Story6 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.684 0.09 10496.06 922.55
Ex Seismic X + Ecc. Y 5 User Specified 0.684 Story6 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.684 0.09 10496.06 922.55
Ex Seismic X - Ecc. Y 5 User Specified 0.684 Story6 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.684 0.09 10496.06 922.55
Ey Seismic Y User Specified 0.684 Story6 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.684 0.09 10496.06 922.55
Ey Seismic Y + Ecc. X 5 User Specified 0.684 Story6 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.684 0.09 10496.06 922.55
Ey Seismic Y - Ecc. X 5 User Specified 0.684 Story6 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.684 0.09 10496.06 922.55

IS1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern Ex according to
IS1893 2002, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple

Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms

Structural Period

Period Calculation Method = User Specified

User Period T = 0.684 sec

Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2] Z = 0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 7] R=5
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 6] I=1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = III

Seismic Response

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g [IS Sa 1.67 Sa

= = 1.67
6.4.5] g T g

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R

Calculated Base Shear

Period Used W Vb
Direction
(sec) (kN) (kN)
X 0.684 10496.0572 922.5482
X + Ecc. Y 0.684 10496.0572 922.5482
X - Ecc. Y 0.684 10496.0572 922.5482
Figure Mass Source

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story6 19.05 49.9074 0
Story5 15.875 278.078 0
Story4 12.7 317.6266 0
Story3 9.525 178.1858 0
Story2 6.35 79.0002 0
Story1 3.175 19.7501 0
Base 0 0 0
2.4 Load Combinations
Different load combinations are generated as per IS1893:2002, since earthquake
load is considered from same code. Minimum eccentricity of 5% is automatically
considered in earthquake load cases by the program. The load combinations are:
a)1.5(DL±LL)
b)1.5(DL+LL±EQX)
c)1.5(DL+LL±EQY)
d)1.2(DL+LL±EQX)
e)1.2(DL+LL±EQY)
f)0.9(DL±EQX)
g)0.9(DL±EQY)
2.5 Load Patterns

TABLE: Load Patterns

Name Type Self Weight Multiplier Auto Load

Dead Dead 1
Live<3 Live 0
Live>3 Live 0
Roof Live Roof Live 0
Wall Superimposed Dead 0
Finish Superimposed Dead 0
Water Tank Other 0
Ex Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
Ey Seismic 0 IS1893 2002

3.0 Modelling of the Structure

The structure is modelled in ETABS 2015.Different data for modelling is shown.refer
attached figures
4.0 Analysis
Methods and tools for analysis
1.Creating grid/ model
2.Defining
a)Material
b)Section (beam, column, slab)
c)Load cases
d)Load pattern
e)Load combination
3.Assigning
a)Section
b)Load
4.Analyze the structure
Earthquake loads are calculated using seismic coefficient method.
5.Design of structural elements
6.Limit state design using above mentioned codes.
5.0 Design
The concrete structures are designed using Limit State Method which is
incorporated in IS456:2000.
It is based on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design

loads and design strengths of the materials. These design loads and design

strengths are obtained by applying partial safety factors for characteristic loads

and strengths of the materials as concrete and steels.The limit state method of

design covers different criteria for design. The two major criteria are
a. Limit State of Collapse:
The limit state of collapse of the structure or part of the structure could be
assessed from rupture of one or more critical sections and from buckling due to
elastic or plastic instability (including effects of sway where appropriate) or
overturning. The resistance to bending, shear, torsion and axial loads at every
section shall not be less than the appropriate value at that section produced by
the probable most unfavourable combination of loads on the structure using the
appropriate partial safety factors.
b. Limit State of Serviceability:
It includes limit for deflection and cracking or local damage. Excessive deflection

and cracks adversely affects the finishes, efficiency and appearance of the

structure and it may impair protection to embedded reinforcements too.

Cracking Limit state: the surface width of the cracks should not, in general, exceed

0.3mm in members where cracking is not harmful and does not have any serious

adverse effects upon the preservation of the reinforcing steel nor upon the

durability of the structure.

Deflection limit states for concrete members are:
i. The final deflection due to all loads including the effects of temperature,
creep and shrinkage and measured from the as-cast level of the supports of
floors, roofs and all other horizontal members, should not normally exceed
 ii. The deflection including the effects of temperature, creep and shrinkage
occurring after erection of partitions and the application of finishes should not
normally exceed span/350 or 20mm whichever is less.
6. Conclusions
This project is the result of group effort of whole group’s member and the .The
project work enables us to consolidate the knowledge of analysis and design of
structure
Since the project site is located at most prone zone to earthquake, we have given
more emphasis on earthquake load rather than others. The seismic coefficient
method is used to analysis the building due to more practicable and easy. ETABS

provided to be helpful tools in the analysis of frame for various loading condition.

In the project, the analysis, design and detailing of all require element of building

were done based on 3-D frame analysis by ETABS.

Detail structural design of building is important aspect of construction procedure.

Practically an engineer employed must have knowledge on designs, construction

procedures, site study etc. Design and layout of the building services like pipeline,

electrical appliances, sanitary and sewage system were not covered in this project.

The environmental, social and economical condition of the locality was not taken

into consideration. The project work was only related with the Structural analysis

of building. Detail cost estimate of the project was not included in this report.

Finally we hope that efforts and coordination for the project work will prove much

useful in our career and project will be helpful in providing information on the

earthquake resistant design and its safe practice and we hope, this project will

help us in similar jobs that we might have in our hands in the future.
 DRAWINGS &
ATTACHMENTS
Fig 1 Axial Force Diagram

Fig 2 Moment Diagram

Fig 3 Shear Diagram

Fig 4 Wall Load Assignment

Fig 5 Live Load Assignment

Fig 6 Roof Live Load Assignment

Fig 7 Finish Load Assignment

Fig 8 Story Drift

Fig 9 Displacement

Fig 10 Overturning Moment

Fig 11 Diaphragm Drift

Fig 11 Centre of Mass Displacement

Fig 11 Centre of Mass Displacement
Fig 12 Section Views
Design of Mat Foundation
from Safe 12
 Design output
Longitutional Rebar
 Design of Dog legged Staircase
Date
Wednesday, March 11, 2020
Part 1: Data Input
Height of Building
3.048 m 3.125 m
No of Riser
1.52 m 0.0 1.52 m 20 Nos
Depth of Slab Assumed
150.000 m
Grade of Concrete
1.27 m

M20
No of Tread=18 and No of Riser=20

Grade of Steel
Fe 500
Live load
4 KN/m2
Finish Load
2.08 m

2.00 KN/m2
Main Bar
12 mm Dia
Distribution Bar
8 mm Dia
0.00 m

Wall Thickness 0.25 m 280 mm

Part 2: Calculations 160 mm
Height of Riser : 160 mm 322 mm
Width of Tread : 280 mm
From Deflection Critearea (Assuming Modification Factor 1) Leff/20
Overall Depth= 180.14 mm
Effective Depth= 165.00 mm
load calculation
Loads on Going Loads on Landing
1) Dead Load 5.19 KN/m2 1) Dead Load 4.50 KN/m2
2) Finish Load 2.00 KN/m2 2) Finish Load 2.00 KN/m2
3) Live Load 4.00 KN/m2 3) Live Load 4.00 KN/m2
Total Load= 11.19 KN/m2 Total Load= 10.50 KN/m2
Factored load= 16.78 KN/m2 Factored load= 15.76 KN/m2
 25.58 KN/m

24.02 KN/m 24.02 KN/m

A
A B
0.00 m 2.08 m 1.27 m

Design moments
Taking moments about A
Rb 41.27 KN Zero Sf 1.66 m
Ra 42.51 KN Max BM 35.32 KN-m
Depth
Ast = d: 93 mm Safe
Solving 4619 mm2
Mu=0.8 1072 mm2

Ast Req 1071.81mm2 No : 10.00

Spacing 152.44 mm Provided= 125.00 mm
Ast Pro : 1379.24mm2 Pt: 0.97%
Fs= 187.05N/mm2 Mod. Factor 1.2
Check For Deflection Depth of Slab From Deflection Criterea Leff/(20*1.2)
Depth Required : 140.00 mm
Hence Provide :150 mm Depth of Slab
Distribution reinforcement bars
Ast : 111.9897718 0
Spacing : 448 mm
Check for shear
at effective depth (d)
Vu= 42.51 KN
τv= 0.20 N/mm2 Safe

Design Summary
Depth of slab 150.00 mm
Depth of Riser 160 mm
Width of Tread 280 mm
Main bar 12mm Dia @125mm Centre to Centre Spacing
distribution bar 8mm Dia @150mm Centre to Centre Spacing
 R.C.C TWO WAY SLAB DESIGN
Case4
Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous

1 Span Short span Lx = 3.048 m

Long span Ly = 3.353 m OK
2
fck 20 N/mm
fy 500 N/mm2
Clear Cover 25 mm
Dia of Bar (Short Dir ) 8 mm
Dia of Bar ( Long Dir ) 10 mm
Aspect ratio Ly/Lx = 1.1 Two Way Slab
2 Modification Factor 2.000
Thickness of slab required 88 mm
Thickness of slab provided 125 mm SAFE fs pt fs Taken
Effective depth of slab (Short Dir) 96 mm Steel Stress 113.35 0.3489 120
Effective depth of slab ( Long Dir ) 87 mm
3 Imposed Load MF 2.00
2 (Refer Sheet L LOADS)
Live load LL = 6.0 KN/m
Floor finish FF = 1.2 KN/m 2 (Refer Sheet L LOADS)
2
Loads for Partition Walls 1.0 KN/m
4 Dead load 3.125 KN/m 2
Total load 11.3 KN/m 2
W u x Lx2 = 157.8 KN m
5 Design moments :
2
Coff. Mu Mu/bd pt
Short Support 0.053 8.36 0.91 0.221
Mid span 0.040 6.31 0.68 0.164
Long Support 0.047 7.42 0.98 0.240
Mid span 0.035 5.52 0.73 0.176
6 Reinforcement Requirements
pt Ast Rqrd Dia S Provided Ast ProvidedS Rqrd pt Provided
Short Support 0.221 2.12 8 150 c/c = 3.35 237 0.349 OK
Mid span 0.164 1.58 8 150 c/c = 3.35 319 0.349 OK
Long Support 0.240 2.09 8 150 c/c = 3.35 241 0.385 OK
Mid span 0.176 1.53 8 150 c/c = 3.35 329 0.385 OK
Mat foundation Nagar.fdb SAFE v12.3.2 - License #
11 March 2020

IS 456-2000 Concrete Strip Design

Geometric Properties Material Properties

Combination = Overall Envelope Concrete Comp. Strength = 20 N/mm2

Strip Label = SA39 Concrete Modulus = 22360 N/mm2
Length = 9.02697 m Longitudinal Rebar Yield = 400 N/mm2
Distance to Top Rebar Center = 24 mm
Distance to Bot Rebar Center = 24 mm

Page 1 of 2
Mat foundation Nagar.fdb SAFE v12.3.2 - License #
11 March 2020

Page 2 of 2
Mat foundation Nagar.fdb SAFE v12.3.2 - License #
11 March 2020

IS 456-2000 Concrete Strip Design

Geometric Properties Material Properties

Combination = Overall Envelope Concrete Comp. Strength = 20 N/mm2

Strip Label = SA33 Concrete Modulus = 22360 N/mm2
Length = 9.6484 m Longitudinal Rebar Yield = 400 N/mm2
Distance to Top Rebar Center = 24 mm
Distance to Bot Rebar Center = 24 mm

Page 1 of 2
Mat foundation Nagar.fdb SAFE v12.3.2 - License #
11 March 2020

Page 2 of 2