Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance
Test Code on
Steam Surface
Condensers
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
This document will be revised when the Society approves the issuance of the next
edition. There will be no addenda issued to ASME PTC 12.2-1998.
Please Note: ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretation of
technical aspects of this document. The interpretations are not part of the document.
PTC 12.2-1 998is being issued with an automatic subscription service to the interpre-
tations that will be issued to it up to the publication of the next edition.
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
This code or standard wasdeveloped under proceduresaccredited as meeting the criteria for American
National Standards. The StandardsCommittee that approved the codeor standard was balanced to assure
that individuals from competent and concerned interestshavehadan opportunity to participate. The
proposed code or standardwasmade available for public review andcomment which provides an
opportunity for additional public input from industry,academia,regulatoryagencies, and the public-
at-large.
ASME does not “approve,“ “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.
ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any items mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyoneutilizing a standard
against liability for infringement of any applicable Letters Patent, nor assume any such liability. Users of
a code or standard are expressly advised thatdetermination of the validity of any such patent rights,and
the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility.
Participation by federal agency representative(s) or personb) affiliated with industry is not to be interpre-
ted as government or industry endorsement of this code or standard.
ASME accepts responsibility for only those interpretations issued in accordance with governing ASME
procedures and policies which preclude the issuance of interpretations by individual volunteers.
Copyright O 1998 by
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY.OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
All Rights Reserved
Printed in U.S.A.
FOREWORD
(This Foreword is not a part of ASME PTC 12.2-1998.)
When the work of revising theASME Power Test Codes of 1915 was undertaken it was
decided to include a Committee to develop three separate test codes on Condensing
Apparatus, Feedwater Heaters, and Water Cooling Equipment. TheresultingTest Code for
Steam-Condensing Apparatus, after passing through preliminarythe stages in the procedure
prescribed by the Main committee, was printed in tentative form in the May 1924 issue
of Mechanical Engineering and was presented to the Society for discussion at a public
hearing held during the SpringMeeting in Cleveland in May1924. At the December1924
meeting of the PTC Supervisory Committee (now known as the Board on Performance
Codes), it was approved in its final revised form and onOctober 5,1925, it was approved
and adopted by the Council as a standard practice of the Society.
Early in 1933 Committee No. 12 decided to completely revisethe Test Code for Steam-
Condensing Apparatus. At the April 4, 1938, meeting of the PTC Supervisory committee,
this second version of the Code was approved and on July 15, 1938, it superseded the
previous one and was adopted as a standard practice of the Society by the Council.
With the reorganization of PTC Committee No. 12 on Condensers, Feedwater Heaters,
and Deaerators in 1948, the main Power Test Codes Committee requested that the Test
Code for Steam-Condensing Apparatus be brought up to date. This third edition of the
Code wasapproved at the December 4,1953, meeting ofthe Power Test Codes Committee
and adopted by the Council as a standard practice of the Society on March 9, 1954.
In January 1970 the PTC Supervisory Committee requested the Test Code for Steam-
Condensing Apparatus be reviewed and updated. That fourth version of the Code was
approved by the Board on Performance Test Codes on May 12, 1981, and it became an
American National Standard in January 1983.
The Board on Performance Test Codes in 1988 directed the Code again be reviewed
to be certain it reflectedcurrentengineeringpractices. A new CodeCommitteewas
organized in early 1989 containing members from a wide geographical area. It comprised
about equal numbers of manufacturing, user, andgeneralinterestmembers to ensure
balanced committee actions. The 1989 Committee was organized into four Subcommit-
tees -
Guiding Principles, Test Procedures, Instruments and Methods, and Computation
of Results - to be sure each section of the Code revision would get attention, and the
work would beaccomplished effectively.
Based on experiencewith the two previous versions of the Condenser Code, the reorga-
nized Committee determined to make this Code modern, accurate, practical, useful, and
cost effective. It also identified the objective of extendingthe Code to include performance
monitoring, because ofthe relatively large effectof operating condensers onplant genera-
tion and efficiency.
These ambitious 1989 goals translatedinto extensive revisionswhich triggered an almost
complete rewrite. The major areas were revised and the revision rationale of this latest
Code follow:
Instruments: To take advantage of the recent significant advances in the field, instrumen-
tation recommendations were modernized.
Heat transfer; TO enlarge the condenser test schedule "window" while maintaining
accurate test results, the separate heat-transfer resistance method with the latest correlations
was adopted.
Implementation: TO clarify the Code rules and producea virtually self-contained docu-
ment, techniques and instrumentation descriptions were written inan explicit and detailed
manner.
...
III
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(The following is the roster of the Committee at the time of approval of this Code.)
OFFICERS
J. M. Burns, Chair
C. W. Almqu’kt, Ph.D., Vice Chair
J.H. Karian, Secretary
COMMITTEEPERSONNEL
Charles W. Almquist Ph.0, Principia Research Corp.
Frank S. Ambrogi, Ecolaire Corp.
Larry J. Beal, PSI Energy
Robert J.Bell, HeatExchangerSystems,Inc.
John M. Bums, Stone & WebsterEngineering Corp.
Roland L. Coit, Consultant
EugeneHernandez, Community Energy Alternatives
Jack H. Kum, ASME International
Philip Marks, Graham Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Edward C. Saxon, Conco Systems, Inc.
James W. Thomton, Virginia Power
John L. Trou, ElectricPower Research Institute
John G. Yost, ResourceManagement International,Inc.
OFFICERS
D. R. Keyser, Chair
P. M. Gerhart, Vice Chair
W. O. Hays, Secretary
COMMITTEE PERSONNEL
R. P. Allen R. S. Hecklinger R. R. Priestley
C. W. Almquist R. W. Henry C. B. Scharp
R. L. Bannister S. J. Korellis J.Siegmund
D. S. Beachler T. H. McCloskey J.A. Silvaggio
B. Bornstein J. W. Milton R. E. Somrnerlad
J. M. Burns G. H. Mittendorf W. G. Steele
J. R. Friedman S. P. Nuspl J. C.Westcotf
G. J.Gerber R. P. Perkins J.G. Yost
A. L. Plumley
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
vi
CONTENTS
Section
O Introduction ............................................ 1
1 Object and Scope........................................ 3
1.1 Object ............................................. 3
1.2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Uncertainty ......................................... 3
2 Definitions and Description of Terms ......................... 5
2.1 Symbols............................................ 5
2.2 Subscripts .......................................... 8
2.3 Superscripts ......................................... 8
2.4 Uncertainty Analysis Nomenclature ....................... 8
3 Guiding Principles ....................................... 9
3.1 Purpose and Intent.................................... 9
3.2 TestPlanRequirements ................................ 9
3.3 Test Schedule ....................................... 10
3.4 Allowable Deviations.................................. 10
3.5 Method of Operation.................................. 10
3.6 Preparation for Test ................................... 10
3.7 Condenser Isolation ................................... 10
3.8 Non-Condensible Gas Load ............................. 10
3.9 Tubeside Blockage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1 O Tubeside Fouling .................................... 11
3.1 1 Dissolved Oxygen ................................... 11
3.1 2 Preliminary Testing .................................. 11
3.1 3 Constancy of Test Conditions ........................... 12
3.1 4 Duration of Test Runs ................................ 12
3.1 5 Test Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1 6 Performance Test Overview ............................ 12
4 InstrumentsandMethods of Measurement...................... 15
4.1 Purpose and Intent.................................... 15
4.2 Location of Test Points ................................. 15
4.3 Instrumentation and Methods of Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5 Computation of Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.1 Basic Heat Transfer Relations ............................ 27
5.2 Condenser Pressure Deviation Results Calculations. . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.3 Deviation of Results Calculations for other Parameters . . . . . . . . . 32
5.4 Uncertainty Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6 ReportofResults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.1 Composition of Report ................................. 37
6.2 Report of Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Tables
3.1 Allowable Deviations from Specified Test Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.2 Non-Condensible GasLoad (Air ln-leakage) Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1 Student’s fv Table for the 95% ConfidenceLevel .................... 33
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Nonrnandatory Appendices
Foreword .................................................... 41
A Guideline: Flowcharts/Checklists............................. 43
B Guideline: Automatic
Data Acquisition. ....................... 49
C Guideline: Performance Monitoring .......................... 51
D Guideline:
Example
Calculations ............................. 53
E Detail: Uncertainty Analysis
for
Condensing Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
F Detail:
Geothermal Surface
Condensers ....................... 73
G Diagnostic: Binding
Air .................................... 75
H Diagnostic:
Non-Condensible Removal
Equipment ............... 77
I Diagnostic:
Tube Fouling .................................. 79
J
Properties Physical 81 of Seawater..............................
K References ............................................. 87
viii
ERS
SURFACE STEAM 12.2 -1 998
CODE FOR
STEAM SURFACECONDENSERS
SECTION O - INTRODUCTION
1
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
E STEAM CONDENSERS PTC ASME 12.2-1998
OBJECT
1.1 1.I .2 Test methods for determining the tube bundle
performance factor and degree of tube fouling, ex-
This Code provides standard directions and rules
pressed as a cleanliness factor or fouling resistance,
for conducting andreportingperformance tests of
are described.
water-cooled, steamsurfacecondensers,hereafter
referred to as condensers. The Code providesexplicit
testprocedures to yield resultsofthehighest level 1.2 SCOPE
ofaccuracyconsistent with thebest engineering
knowledge and practicecurrentlyavailable.The Therulesandinstructions included in thisCode
mainpurposeof this Code is to providerules for are for thecondenserproper. If the scopeofthe
performingcondenseracceptance tests. TheCode test includes any orallof theauxiliary apparatus
also provides guidelines for the routine performance associated with thecondenser, it will be necessary
evaluation of condensers. to refer to other ASME Performance TestCodes.
Theacceptance test canbe used to determine 1.2.1 The determination of special data or verifica-
compliance with contractual obligations and can be tion of guarantees which are outside the scope of
incorporated into commercial agreements.Thetest this Codeshallbemade onlywith thewritten
shall be considered an ASME Code Test only if the agreement of the partiesto the test, especially regard-
test procedures comply with those detailed recom- ing methods of
measurement andcomputation,
mendations in this Codeandthepretestandpost which shallbecompletelydescribed in thetest
test uncertainty analysis complies with Subsections report.
1.3 and 5.4.
1.3
UNCERTAINTY
1.1.1 This Code provides rules for determining the Theuncertaintyoftheprojecteddesign point
performanceofacondenser with regard to the pressure from the acceptance test, using the recom-
following: mended procedures and instrumentation, is expected
(a) the absolute pressure maintained by the con- to be less than 0.1 in. Hg. A posttestuncertainty
denser, or its projected design pressure with an uncer- analysis is required. Due to the variety of methods
tainty of 20.12 in. Hg; and instruments, the test uncertainty for routine heat
(b) the extent of condensate subcooling with an transferperformance tests mustbeestimated by a
uncertainty of zO.2OF; specific uncertainty analysis, described in Subsection
(c) the amount of dissolved oxygenin the conden- 5.4, and the resulting uncertainty shall be less than
sate, with an uncertainty of 21 .O ppm; and 0.12 in. Hg in order to be considered a Code Test.
(ci) the tubeside pressure drop,with an uncertainty The other test objective parameter uncertainties are
of 22%. more directly measured and defined in para. 1.1 . l .
Units
us.
Symbol Term Description Customary SI
A Effective
outside Total active external area of ft2 m*
tube surface area all tubes in condenser, in-
cluding external air cooler if
used. Active areaexcludes
any
tubes that may be
plugged at time of test.
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
water at average temperature
and for salinity measured
during test.
Acceleration of Constant
used in Nusselt ft/sec2
gravity equation.
Units
us.
Symbol Term Description Customary SI
h Heattransfercoef- Rate of heat transfer perunit Btdhr-ft2- W/m2K
ficient of surface area and tempera- "F
ture difference. This quantity
is the fundamental measure
condenser
the
of per-
formance.
i Variable Summation -
k Thermal conduc- Rate of heat transfer perunit Btulh r-ft- Wlm- K
tivity of distance within a material "F
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ture difference temperaturedifference be-
tween steam and cooling
water (see Section 5)
In Natural logarithm -
Q Condenser
heat Rate atwhich heat in steam is Btulhr W
load transferred to coolingwater.
This is usuallyconsidered
the independent variable in
any condenser test.
6
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=Tenaga nasional Berhad/5969199001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/03/2007 20:35:10 MDT
S T D - A S M E P T C 12.2-ENGL L978 m 0759b70Ob05018 Lb7
Units
us.
Symbol Term Description Customary S1
SCFM in-leakage
Air Measured rate of standard
air scf m -
(at 14.7 psiaand 60°F) in-
leakage into condenser as
discharged from air-removal
system
T Temperature Temperature
of cooling "F "C
water, steam, or condensate.
V Cooling-water
ve- Average
water velocity Wsec m/S
locity through tubes. For multipass
condensers with an unequal
number of tubes in the differ-
ent passes, the average of the
average velocities for all pas-
ses shall be used.
A Differential Difference
between two
measured values.
P viscosity Intensity
of
viscousshear I b/hr-ft kg/s-m
within a fluid.
7
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
O
X Low-pressure section ular data for the degrees of freedom, v, and
Y Intermediate pressure a 95% coverage, per Table D5.1.
section The degrees of freedomfor parameter j, used
Z High-pressure section in evaluating the precision error estimate.
S Shell or steam The sensitivity factor for parameter j .
sat Saturation
T Total
T Tubeside
V Vapor
W Wall of tube
7 Inlet
2 Outlet
3 Condensate
A Differential
2.3 SUPERSCRIPTS
Symbol Description
* Value
derived
from
the
design
reference.
+ Measured value
or
calculated
value
at
the
test conditions.
O Test valuecorrected to the designreference
conditions.
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
exists,a methodmust be agreed upon i n advance
tional requirements for the condenser and any ancil-
of the test. Wherever a special method of testing is
lary system that may affect its performance. A listing
used, that is, anymethodnot explicitly covered in
of all values for theoperationalandperformance
theCode, it shall be agreed upon in advanceof
parametersshouldbecontained in thissection in-
thetestby all partiesandshallbe fully described
cluding any specific operational changes necessary
in the test report.
to perform the test. These can include specific cycle-
It is important to structure a specific test plan for
isolation considerations and the verification ofany
all testingthat is to takeplace.The plan should
items which can be considered deviations from the
follow theguidelinesandrecommendationsgiven
Code,reasons for their occurrence,andanyother
in this Section. In doing so, inconsistenciesassoci-
item which canpossiblyimpact on theoperation
ated with test execution, communications, procedure
and performance of the condensing apparatus. (Refer
adherence, and test schedule can be greatly dimin-
to Table 3.1 for limits.)
ished.AppendixAcontainsseveralelementsofa
test plan ¡.e., flowchartsandchecklists.
3.2.4 TestAcceptance Criteria. This section of the
plan will include an explanation of the test accept-
ance criteria andadescriptionof how theresults
will be used in theevaluationofanycontractual
commitments or guarantees associated with the per-
3.2
TEST P I A N REQUIREMENTS
formance of thecondenser.Apretestuncertainty
3.2.1TestPlanIntroduction. In an effort to have analysis i s highly recommended as part of this sec-
a mutual agreementbetweenthetestingparties, it tion. Any other items not mentioned or specifically
is strongly recommended that a test plan be devel- identified as items of mutualagreementshould be
oped that will address all items of possible disagree- discussed in thissection.
ment. In order to accomplish this, a document should
be writtento definethis test planand identify 3.2.5InstrumentationList. A list includingall test
all designatedpartieshavingthe responsibility to parameters,instrumentsused,expectedaccuracy,
perform, witness, or approve any test deviation from calibrations thereof, installation location, and antici-
this Code or anyothermutuallyagreed-upontest patedvaluesshouldbe included as partofthis
plan or procedure. This document should also serve section. This will help clarify any misunderstandings
as a guide for those performing or interpreting the that can occur during the instrumentation selection
resultsofthespecific test. It shouldinclude, but process and serve as an aid for instrument diagnosis.
not be limited to, the following sections. (Refer to Appendix A for guidance.)
TABLE 3.1
ALLOWABLE DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFIEDTEST CONDITIONS
Deviation
from Constancy
Specified Test of
Conditions* Conditions Testing Parameter
inlet-water temperature +lO°F 22°F
10
TABLE 3.2
NON-CONDENSIBLE GAS LOAD (AIR IN-LEAKAGE)LIMITS
Total Exhaust Steam Non-condensible
Number of Flow to Condenser Cas load Limit
Condenser Shells (Ib/hr) (SCFM)
One up to 1,000,000 1 .o
One 100,00&250,000 2.0
One 250,000-500,000 2.5
One 500,000-1,000,000 3.O
One 1,000,000-2,000,000 3.75
One 2,000,000-3,000,000 4.5
One 3,000,000-4,000,000 5.0
Two 200,000-500,000 3.5
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Two 500,000-1,000,000 4.0
Two 1,000,000-2,000,000 6.0
Two 2,000,000-4,000,000 7.5
Two 4,000,000-6,000,000 8.5
Two 6,000,000-8,000,000 10.0
11
12
3.16.4CondensateSubcooling. Condensatesub-
3.1 6.2.3 Cooling-Water Flow. The cooling-water cooling(condensatedepression) is thedegreeto
flow is requiredforseveralphases of theanalysis. whichthecondensatehasbeencooledbelowthe
Unless a turbinetestper PTC 6 [41 is performed saturationtemperaturecorrespondingto the mea-
concurrently, measurementof the cooling-water flow sured condenser shellside pressure. Condensate sub-
rate, together with the inlet and outlet temperatures, cooling must be measured if it is a design or guaran-
is the preferred method of determining the heat load tee point for the condenser, or if it is of interest for
on the condenser,which is requiredtodetermine generalperformancecalculations.Thecondensate
the OHTC. Several methods for accurately determin- temperature is determined at the same time as the
ing the cooling-waterflowrate are given in para. heattransfertest,using the method given in para.
4.3.4. Choice of an appropriatemethodcanonly 4.3.10.
be made after considering both the requirements of
the individualmethodsand the characteristics of 3.16.5 Cooling-Water Pressure Drop. To ensure
the particularinstallationbeingtested. adequate performance of the cooling-water pumping
It is
extremelyimportant
that
an
appropriate system,thepressuredropacrossthecondenser
method of condensercooling-waterflowmeasure- should be within design values. The condenser pres-
ment is chosen. Theheatloadmayalsobedeter- suredrop is measuredfrom the inletflangetothe
mined by a full steamcycleenergybalance,per- outletflange of the condenser. It is recommended
formed in conjunctionwith a full turbinetest as thatthepressure drop measurementsbemadeat
13
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
14
CE STEAM 12.2-1998
SECTION 4 - INSTRUMENTSANDMETHODS
OF MEASUREMENT
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT required by this Code may be included for reference
purposes by mutual agreement between the parties
ThisSectiondescribestheinstrumentsandthe
to the test.
methods for their application which are required for
the condenserperformancetestdescribed in this
Code.Reference is made to existing standards and
4.2.2
Single-Pressure
Surface
Condenser. Figure
procedures although major requirements and consid-
4.1 shows the location of thetestpoints in the
condenser neck that are needed to obtain the per-
erations which are ofparticularrelevance to con-
denser performance testing are summarized where formancedatarequiredforasingle-passsingle-
appropriate. Notall instruments or techniquesde- pressure surface condenser. The final location of all
scribed in this Section are applicable to every con- test pointsshould be determined by mutual
denser test program. Consult the procedural descrip- agreement, taking into accountthe internal design
tions given in Section 3 to determine which of the condenser and external piping configuration,
instruments and methods are applicable. Where this both of which mayresult in stratification atthe
Code refers to NlST (National Institute of Standards measurement points. Test points with instruments
andTechnology)standardsand calibrations, those internal to thecondenser,such as basket tips and
of otherequivalentnational standardslaboratories thermowells, should be located to avoid interference
may be used as appropriate for thelocale of the from condenser internal structural bracing and com-
testing. ponents. All waterbox test connectionsshouldbe
Before proceeding to select, construct, install, cali- shop installed if the internal surfaces the
of
brate, oroperateinstruments,relevantSectionsof waterboxesrequireaprotective coating or lining.
the PTC 19 Series ofsupplements on Instruments Field-installed testconnectionsrequire field repair
and Apparatus [4],ASME MFC-3M (to be superceded of the coating or lining.
by ASMEPTC 19.5 when it is published) [ l l ] , or
ASME fluid Meters [7] should be consulted for 4.2.3MultipressureSurfaceCondenser. The per-
detailedinstructions. formance test points andtest point locations for
Achievementoftherequiredaccuracy for each multipass and multipressure surface condensers will
parametermeasured is thesinglemostimportant be similar to those illustrated in Fig. 4.1 except for
criterion in selectionofanappropriatemethodof the following considerations:
measurement.ThisCodeshallnotbeconstrued as Single-shell multipressure condensers require addi-
preventingthe use of advancedtechnologies or tional condenserpressuretestpointsaboveeach
methods of measurement not described herein, pro- tube bundle in each of the multipressure condensing
vided that theaccuracyrequirements of Appendix zones. The performanceof each zone can be closely
D are achieved by the alternative method. estimated by measuring the final outlet temperature
It is highly recommended that provisions for con- in accordance with para.4.3.3 and proportioning
denser testing beincorporated into thedesignof the temperature rise of each zone using procedures
the facility at which the condenser is located. Back- described in Section 5.
fitting an existing system for the required measure- Multishellmultipressurecondensers requireaddi-
mentscanbeveryexpensiveandtime-consuming tional pressure and temperature test points to mea-
at best, and virtually impossibleatworst. sure the inlet and outlet cooling-water pressure and
temperature for each of the multipressure condenser
shells. Stratification canpersist in theshortlength
4.2 LOCATION OF TEST POINTS
of the cooling-water crossover piping between rnulti-
4.2.1 General. Figure 4.1 illustratesthegeneral pressurecondensershells.Therefore, the average
location of the test points. Additional test points not temperature of the inlet cooling waterto the interme-
15
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=Tenaga nasional Berhad/5969199001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/03/2007 20:35:10 MDT
S T D - A S M E P T C 1 2 - 2 - E N G L 199B m 0759b70 Ob05027 L 7 T m
I I
W = Water
level measurement DO = Dissolved
oxygen
measurement Supplemental
test
connection
P = Pressuremeasurement S = Salinitymeasurement
16
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
17
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Flow
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(stainless steel)
r i-" 12 n
i-. Flow
1 7
3
C
12 in.
18
diameter is less than 12 in.). If a well is used, it ples or three-wire RTDsareused, calibration must
should be cleanand filledwith asuitableheat include the lead wires.A minimum of five calibration
transfer liquid, such as glycol, and packing should points covering the expected range of temperatures
be used around theprobe to minimize heat exchange shall be taken.
with the environment.
If a singlepoint measurement is used, the measure-
4.3.3 Cooling-WaterOutletTemperature
mentmaybemadeeitheratthe inlet pipe or in
the inlet waterbox. 4.3.3.1 location of Measurement Points. The
measurement of outlet temperature is more difficult
4.3.2.2 Instruments. Inlet temperaturemeasure- than inlet temperature because of the possibility of
mentsshallbemade with instrumentshavingan non-uniform temperatures in the outlet pipe arising
accuracyof atleast +O.l"F. Several instruments from uneven heat transfer rates in the tube bundle.
capable of achieving this accuracy are suitable for If possible, measurement of the discharge tempera-
use in condenser testing, such as resistance-tempera- ture should be made far downstream from the con-
turedevices (RTDs), thermocouples (TCs), thermis- denser wherethedischarge is well mixed and the
tors, and liquid-in-glass thermometers. Mercury ther- temperature is uniform.Thislocation is acceptable
mometersare not recommended because of the if the cooling-water discharge from the unit under
potential environmental hazards posed by the mer- testdoes not mix with any other significant flows,
cury in case ofbreakage.Thegeneralprocedures and if it can be shown that the heat loss from the
given in PTC 19.3 [4] shouldbefollowed. discharge pipe to the environment is less than 0.2%
Thermometers, if used,shouldbeofthe total of the condenser duty, and if it can be determined
immersiontype with etched stems.Thermometers that no stratification exists.Thelatterrequirement
should have clearly readablegraduationsof 0.1"F. can be metbymakingatleast five temperature
If the thermometer was calibrated for total immer- measurements alongsingle vertical traverse, and
sion, an emergent stem correction factor as described verifyingthatthereare no temperaturedifferences
in PTC 19.3 [4]should be applied. The thermometer greater than 0.2"F or 1YO of the average temperature
shouldbeisolatedfromheat sources, andbe well rise across the condenser, whichever is greater. The
illuminated. The thermometershouldbeinspected temperaturemeasurement for testing canbemade
before and after the tests to ensure that it is in good byeitherinsertingaprobe directlyinto theflow,
physical condition, with no breaks, cracks, or liquid or by usingathermowell as described in para.
separation. 4.3.2.
Type E thermocouples are recommended for the If an acceptable, well-mixed downstream location
temperaturerangeusuallyencounteredatnormal cannotbefound,thenthe outlet temperaturecan
cooling-watertemperatures.Continuousleads from be determinedfrom an array of temperature measure-
the measuring tip to the thermocouple readout must mentsateach outlet pipe at a suitably convenient
be provided to avoid errors due to thermally induced location. One temperaturemeasurement shall be
EMF at splice junctions. made for every 1.S sq ft of conduit flow area
One hundred-ohm platinumRTDs are also recom- providing the measurement grid consists of at least
mended. Any thermistor with a nominal impedance six points, and no more than 18 points are required.
ofgreaterthan 1000 ohmsat 32°F is acceptable. These points shall be taken at the centers of equal
For RTDs and thermistors, either a three- orfour-wire areas and shall be averaged arithmeticallywith equal
measurement is acceptable. The four-wire method is weight. In the caseof a circular conduit, measure-
recommended, although the three-wire method may ments shallbealongatleastthreefull-diameter,
be used providing that therequiredmeasurement equally spacedtraverses, with measurements made
uncertainty can be achieved. If the three-wire method at concentric circles satisfying the equal area require-
is used, all RTDleadsmust be continuous back to ment. In a rectangular conduit, any suitable equal-
the measuring device to avoid errors due to unequal area positioning scheme may be used. The tempera-
splice resistance. This is not a requirement with the turesmay be taken either by traverse or by means
four-wire method or with thermistors. of a fixed array of temperature probes. Thermowells
19
will not provide sufficient spatial resolution to meet frequency standard shall be conducted both before
the requirements of this paragraph. and after the testing program.
Differential pressuremeasuringdevicesusedfor
4.3.4 Cooling-Water Flow. Cooling-water flow de-
Pitot-statictypemeasurements shall be calibrated
termination is required for interpretation of waterside
before and after the test to an accuracy of at least
pressure drop data, for computationoftubewater
50.25% ofthemaximum differential pressureex-
velocity, and for determination of the heat load on
pected. Mechanical gauges,manometers,andelec-
the condenser (condenser duty) by the direct method.
tronic differential pressuretransducersareaccept-
The following methods of cooling-water flow mea-
able, so long as thestatedaccuracyrequirements
surement in thelargeconduits typicallyfoundin
aremet.
acentralgeneratingstationsteamcondenserare
The velocity probe should be inspected for damage
acceptable for thepurposesof this Codeandare
periodicallyduring testing. If anydamage to the
capable of providingan uncertainty of &l-2% when
probe is noted, all measurementsmadesincethe
properlyimplemented:
previousinspection shall beretaken with another
(a) velocity traverse;
calibrated probe. For this reason, it is recommended
(b) tracer dilution;
that atleast two calibrated probes be available for
(c) differential producer;
testing.
(d) ultrasonic time-of-travel;
A velocity probe may experience vibration under
(e) energy balance.
certain flow conditions. For non-LDVtype probes,
Considerations concerning the applicationof these
if such vibration is detected,the cause of the vibration
methods to steamcondensersarecovered in this
shall becorrected. For non-LDV probes,measure-
Section.
Thecooling-water flow determination
mentstakenunderconditions of significant probe
shouldbemadeconcurrently with the heattrans-
vibration shall be considered invalid. Indicatorsof
fer test.
probe vibration include asharpchange(usuallya
4.3.4.1 Velocity Traverse Methods. Velocity tra- rise) in the probedifferential when the probe position
verse methods are generally most applicable to the is changed slightly, physical vibration ofexposed
measurement of flow in large conduits in which the part oftheprobe,ora relatively suddenonsetof
size of the probe will not affect the measured flow. a high level of periodic pressurepulsations.
Nuid Meters, Chapter 1-7, describesthegeneral At least 10 diameters of straight,unobstructed
considerations for acceptable velocity traverse meth- piping shall existupstreamand 5 diameters down-
ods. [7] For thepurposes of PTC 12.2 [4], the streamofthemeasuringstation.Traverseshallbe
Fechheimer and Keil Pitot-static type probes and the taken along at least three equally spaced diameters.
insertion-type fiber-optic laser Doppler velocimeter Thetraverselocations shall follow theChebyshef
(LDV)are explicitly recommended,althoughother weighing scheme described in Chapter 1-7 of Nuid
instruments which meetuncertaintyrequirements Meters [71, with a minimum of tenpointsalong
may be used. If theFechheimerprobe is used, it eachdiameter.Anexampleofacceptabletraverse
is recommended that the directional-sensing capabil- points is shown in Fig. 4.4.
ities of theprobebeused to determinethe local
flow angle, and that this flow angle be incorporated 4.3.4.2 Tracer Dilution Methods. Tracer dilution
into the flow determination. If theLDVprobe is methods are particularly applicable to the measure-
used, it should be oriented so that it picks up the ment of flow in large conduits. Although no formal
component of flow parallel to the pipe axis. standard on their use currently exists,themethod
Pitot-static and other non-LDV type probes shall is discussed in Chapter 1-9 of Fluid Meters [7] under
be inspected and calibrated before and after the test theheading Method of Mixtures. If this technique
by a hydraulic laboratory to an uncertainty of 51% is used,theparties to thetest shall agree upon
using standards traceable to the NIST. The post-test thedetails of implementation, provided thatthe
calibration requirement may be waived if inspection guidelines outlined here are followed.
reveals no damage to theprobe. A deviationof A key requirement of the tracer is that it exhibit
morethan 1% betweenthepretestandpost-test minimal tendency to adsorb onto organic and inor-
calibrations shall be cause for investigation. Calibra- ganic surfaces. Recent applications of this technique
tions shall covertherange of Reynoldsnumbers havemostoftenusedRhodamine W fluorescing
(based on probe diameter) expected in the velocity dye as the tracer, although any dye which can be
measurements. For an LDV probe, calibration of the shown to be conservative (not subject to adsorption
LDV processing electronics against an NIST-traceable or other loss mechanisms) i s acceptable.Thedye
20 --``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
E STEAM 12.2-1998
Chebyshef
Distribution
I ~~
Relative radius
~~
I
(a) 0.2891
(b) 0.5592
(c) 0.7071
(d) 0.8290
(e) 0.9572
21
reduced by the presence of flow disturbances such pling temperatures and correcting the readings to a
as pumps, elbows, valves, or orifices. The presence common temperature. For Rhodamine WT dye, the
of complete mixing atthesamplingcross-section temperaturecorrectionsmaybefound from the
shall bedetermined by traversebefore testing by following equation (SmartandLaidlaw [9]):
withdrawing samples at nine equally spaced points
along 1 diameter at the sampling cross-section and
verifying that the concentrations at all points agree
to within +1%. This verification shall be conducted
within +-25'/0 of the flow at which thecondenser where F, = fluorescenceatstandardtemperature
testsare to be run. T, and Fe is the measured fluorescence at tempera-
Injection of dyemay be througha manifold or ture T.
at a single point in theflow, so long as complete The tracer injection apparatus shall be calibrated
mixing of the dye at the sampling point is verified for injection flow before and after the test program.
as describedabove. The uncertainty of the injection rate shall be -Co.5%
The dye concentration must reach steady state at or better.
thesampling point before data to beused in the The fluorometer (or other concentration measure-
flow determinationaretaken.Thisdetermination ment instrument) shall be calibrated before and after
shall be made by continuously monitoring the tracer the test program. Calibrations shall be performed at
concentration at the sampling cross-section. a minimum of threeconcentrationsbracketingthe
Caremust be taken to ensure that noflow is expected dye concentration. Instrument uncertainty
introduced or removedbetweenthe injection and shallbe no morethan 21%.
samplingstations. It is not sufficient to simply ac- Periodic field calibration of thetracer injection
count for these flows, since a smallinflow or outflow apparatus and the fluorometerduring testing is highly
can lead to a large measurement error. An exception recommended to ensuredata integrity.
is thatany outflows between the section at which 4.3.4.3 DifferentialProducers. Differential pro-
complete mixing has been verified and the sampling
ducers which areaccepted by this Code include
station will not affect the measured flow.
the orifice plate,the flow nozzle,andtheventuri
Precautions must be taken if the possibility exists
meter.Thesedevices will be most applicable to
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
22
significant features are summarized here. A minimum suregauge is of the proper diameter and is sloped
of four parallel chordalpathsshall be provided, continuously downward from the gauge to the ori-
regardless of the size of the conduit. The metering fice, to avoid accumulation of water.Gauge pressure
section shall be preceded by atleast 10 diameters and temperature of the discharge shall be measured
and followedby atleast3diameters ofstraight either upstream or downstream of the orifice plate.
pipe.Thetime-of-travelinstrumentation shall be The differential pressure instrument, static pressure
tested at zero flow before andafter the test to ensure gauge, and the temperature measuring device shall
properandaccurateoperation. be calibrated before and after thetests. The differen-
Because this methodmaybeadverselyaffected tial pressure instrument attached to the orifice shall
by the presence of silt and other particulates or air becalibrated to an uncertaintyof 2 1 % ofthe
bubbles in theflow, it shouldbe verified that the expected orifice differential. The static pressure de-
sourcewater is suitablycleanbeforethemetering vice shall be calibrated to an uncertainty of 2 1 psi.
system is installed. The temperature measuring device shall be calibrated
Sinceultrasonic time-of-travel systemsare rela- to an uncertainty of +1 "F.
tively difficult and expensive to install, it is recom- The flow shall bedeterminedaccording to the
mendedthatprovision for its installation in the equations for gas flow through an orifice as given
cooling-water pipingbe madeduringdesignand in Part 11-111 of PTC 19.5 [4] or ASME MFC3M.
construction of the cooling system. 1111 Gasproperties,such as the expansionfactor,
density, and viscosity, shall be determined assuming
4.3.4.5EnergyBalanceMethods. In theenergy
that the orificeflow consistsofsaturated air. For
balance method, an energy balance on the turbine-
convenience, simplified equations yielding sufficient
generator cycle is performed in order to determine
accuracy for purposes of this paragrapharegiven
the rate at which heat is rejected to the condenser
in Appendix H.
(condenser duty) in the low-pressure exhaust steam.
As described in para.3.16.2, cooling-water flow 4.3.6 Hotwell Level. Thecondenser hotwell shall
canthen be determinedfromthecondenserduty be provided with a sight glass, graduated in at least
andthedifferencebetweenthe inlet and outlet l-in. increments. The level of water in the hotwell
waterbox temperatures. One advantage of this shall be monitored and remain within design limits
method is thatthecondenserduty is determined for the duration ofthetest.
directly.
Determination of the condenser dutyby the energy 4.3.7 Waterbox level. Waterbox level shall be-
balance method shall be performedaccordingthe monitoredthroughoutthe tests to ensurethat all
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
applicablesectionsof PTC 6 [4] for the testing of waterboxes are kept full. A means for verifying that
steam turbines. Because ofthecomplexity of this the condenser waterboxes are full of water should
test, it is recommended that the condenser be tested be used during thetest period.
at the same time as the steam turbine. The overall 4.3.8Waterbox Differential Pressures. Differential
uncertainty of the condenser duty measurement will pressuregaugesshall be provided to measurethe
have to be determined for eachcasebased on the pressure drop between the inlet and outlet waterbox
cycles,procedures,andinstrumentation used. nozzles. There shall be at least onedifferential gauge
4.3.5
Non-condensible Flow. Non-condensible for each parallel water circuit in the condenser. The
flow shall be measured by methods that have been gauges shall be calibrated before and after the test
shown to be accurate.ThisCoderecommendsthe to 2 1o/o of the maximum expected differential. Me-
use of anorifice plate locatedat or near the discharge chanical gauges orelectronic differential pressure
of the evacuating apparatus. The orifice plate shall gauges are acceptable. Mercury manometers are not
meet the specifications described in ASME-MFC-3M recommended due to the operational and environ-
[l I ] (see alsoSubsection4.1)or PTC 19.5. [4] mental hazards posed should the mercury be inad-
Provided that all specified installation criteria are vertently blown from the manometer.
followed, no calibration of the orifice meter is re-
4.3.9
Dissolved
Oxygen
quired. Particular attention should be paid to ensur-
ing that adequate lengths of straight pipe upstream 4.3.9.1General. This method describes the mea-
anddownstreamofthe orifice areavailable,that surement of the dissolved oxygen(DO) concentration
the pressure taps are properly located and finished, of the condensate. Prior to conducting the measure-
and that the pressure piping to the differential pres- mentsdescribed in thisSection,theconditions for
23
testing in accordance with Subsection 3.1 1 of this 4.3.1 O Condensate Temperature. Condensate tem-
Codemustbeachieved. perature measurements shall be made in accordance
with the general procedures describedin para. 4.3.2.
4.3.9.2SampleExtraction. Sampling of the con- The thermowells should be located upstream of the
densate for DO shall be performed by extracting condensatepump.
condensate from the condensate outlet piping as
close as possibletothe hotwellbutprior to the 4.3.11Saline/Brackish Water Concentration. Sa-
condensatepump,and priortoaddition of any linity measurements shall be made by using Method
oxygen scavenging chemicals (seeFig. 4.1). Extrac- 2520 for "Salinity" from StandardMethodsforthe
tion shall be madeusing a pump. Caremust be ExaminationofWaterandWastewater. [6]
taken to avoid any air ingress in thesample line
4.3.12TubeBundleFouling(Cleanliness)
from the hotwell outlet piping to the pump. Samples
shallbemeasured in each hotwell outlet which is 4.3.12.1 Introduction. ThisCoderequires a de-
in use. termination ofthecondensertube bundle fouling.
The sample nozzle should extendinto the conden- Themeasurement is necessary in order to adjust
sate outletpiping 4 in. or 25% of the pipe diameter, thecondenser overall heattransfer coefficient test
whichever is less. Metal tubing shall be used to results to design or guarantee conditions. The fouling
connect the sample nozzle to the DO probe,and test consists of a measurement of the outlet tempera-
to connectthe DO probe to thesampling pump. tures of sets of two adjacent tubes. One of the tubes
The pump effluentmay be routed back to the of each set remains in the as-found fouled condition
condenserundervacuum, in order to reducethe while the neighboring tube has either been cleaned
pump head pressure. or replaced with a new tube. As required,the
condenser has justhad a generalcleaning. Other-
4.3.9.3SampleConditioning. Samples forcon- wise, the tube pair experience identical heat transfer
tinuous flow oxygen analyzersshould beat flow rates
conditions, ¡.e., steampressures, cooling-water flow
andtemperaturesrecommended by the instrument rates, and velocities. Theoutlet temperature measure-
manufacturers. Flow and temperature shall be held ments provide a comparison of the heattransfer
constant during the tests. rates of the tube pairs,and, consequently, the bundle
If sample tubing is used to transport the sample fouling resistance.
toa remotelocation,the tubing shall be sized to
maintain a minimum velocity of 5 to 6 Wsec. 4.3.12.2Measurement locations. The
number
Prior to the tests, sample lines and instrumentation of pairsoftubesselectedfor the fouling test shall
shall be flushed for a sufficient time to ensure that be oneper 2000 tubesper tube bundle, butnot
lines are free from air bubbles or pockets. fewerthanfourpairsor'morethan 16 pairsper
bundle. The pairs shallbe located at the approximate
4.3.9.4 Oxygen Analysis. Portable or in-line oxy- centroidsofequaltubesectors within the tube
gen analyzers using membrane-covered galvanic or bundle pattern. However, it is not recommended to
polarographic oxygen sensors are the recommended placepairs within three tube rows of the bundle
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
method of analysis. The instrument used shall have periphery due to the atypical conditions there. The
a detection limit of less than 1.O ppm, with a number of pairs per number of tubes shall be the
maximum error of 21 .O ppm. same regardless of whether the condenseris a single-
The instrument shall be calibrated before and after pass,two-pass, or multipressure type.
the test. If calibration is performed using atmospheric
oxygen,theanalyzershall be given sufficient time 4.3.12.3
TestConditionsandMeasurements.
to reach equilibrium with the condensate DO level. Thetestshallbe conducted immediatelybefore,
It is recommended that theinstrumentanalysis during, or after the condenser heat transfer test, as
be verified by a wetchemistrytechnique prior to is convenient. Besides the outlet temperature,the
running the testsperPTC 12.3. I41 cooling-waterflow, inlet temperatures,and con-
If the oxygen sensor fouls from condensate con- denserpressures shall be measured.Themeasure-
taminants,the titrimetric methodshallbecomethe ment, calibration, test conditions, and limitations of
recommended method of analysis. The sample shall these parameters shall comply in all respects to all
be removed in thesamemanneras described in therelatedrequirements listed in thisSectionand
para. 4.3.9.2, with thesample being collected at Table 3.1. A minimumof four sets of readings
the discharge of the extraction pump. spanning 30 min shall constitute a test.
24
4.3.1 2.4 Outlet Temperature Installation.A tem- [c) Attachment of a suitable minimal blockage fix-
perature sensorshall be installed attheoutletsof ture into the tube interior that holds thesensor is also
eachofthetubes in amannerthat ensures tube permitted if it can be demonstrated the total added
blockage is minimized and an accuratedischarge blockage is less than 5% of the internal tube flow area.
temperature is measured.The installation shall be 4.3.1 2.5 Tube Temperature Rises. Tube tempera-
sufficiently rugged and suitably waterproofed to with- ture rises for the fouling tests shall be measured in
stand the hydraulic forces and temperatures of the generalaccordance with theproceduresdescribed
discharged cooling water.Thetemperaturesensor in this section. RTDs or thermocouples may be used,
lead wire fromthesampledtubesshallberouted providedthattheuncertaintyofthetemperature
andsecuredbetween the tubeholesonthe outlet measurement systemis at most 20.1 "F. If thermocou-
tube sheet.They shall bebundledandfed out ples are
used, it is recommended that a direct
through a new or existing waterbox penetration to differential temperature measurement setup be used.
the readout. If RTDs are used, it is highly recommendedthat
In the case of two-pass or multipressure condensers the pairs of RTDs which will be used on the moni-
in separateshells, tube pairs located in the bundle tored tubes be calibrated together, in order to mini-
mize the effect of any bias errors in the calibration
subsequent to the first shall have aninlet temperature
on the determination of the temperature difference
measurement similar to that described for the outlet
between the pairedRTDs. Provision shall be made for
sensor.
calibration of the temperature measurement devices
Since the variety of installation situations will be before and after the fouling test, over the expected
numerous, only generalguidanceon affixing the range of temperature differences and within 5°F of
sensor to the tube sheet can be provided, as follows. the expected inlet-water temperature. Following the
(a) If an outlet tube stub exists, plastic collars can fouling test, all instrumented tubes shall be inspected
be utilized as shown in Appendix G. to ensurethattheyareclearandhave not been
(6) Direct attachment to the tubesheet i s permissi- influenced by blockage or anyotherfactor(other
ble as long as the sensor extends into the flow. thantube fouling) which mayaffecttheresults.
25
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
STEAM SURFACE
CONDENSERS 12.2-1998
5.1 BASIC
HEAT
TRANSFER
RELATIONS
Tubewall
5.1.3Resistance.
This Section defines all the computations required
to obtain results
addressed
tests
from
the
various
types
condenser
of
in the Code. For both single-pass
R& = -
do
24
* ln
* k',
(5) (5.1.4)
0.373
u+ = Q+ (5.1.2) where
A, * LMTD+
where
27
method. For j pairs of tubes, the fouling resistance, R & = R+, (5.2.1)
R b is determinedby:
5.2.2TubesideResistance. Thetubesidethermal
(5.1 . l o ) resistance is calculated at thedesign conditions as
follows:
- 1 1 0.373 d0.165
(&*OS38 * 0.835 * c+
P 0 . 4 8 2 )p 0*
.835 L
where
5.1.6ShellsideResistance. The shellsideresistance
at thetest conditions is determined by difference
as follows:
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
5.2
CONDENSERPRESSURE DEVIATION
RESULTS CALCULATIONS
5.2.3FoulingResistance. Themanufacturer'sde-
It is unlikely that the'conditions duringa perform-
signdata usually express the fouling resistance in
ance test will ever exactly match the design condi-
terms of a cleanliness factor. If the design reference
tions. As a result, comparison of the measured con-
condenser pressure is based on a cleanliness factor
denser shell pressure to thedesign value is not
of 1 .O, thedesign fouling resistance, Rf, is equal
meaningful. Instead, it is first necessary to adjust
to zero.Forany othervalueofcleanlinessfactor,
the test results from the test conditions to the design the resulting fouling resistance is determined as
reference conditions. The correction procedures
follows:
which follow are based on adjusting the test calcu-
lated heat transfer resistancesfor differences between
the test anddesignconditions.Thesevaluesare (5.2.6)
then used to computetheadjusted overall heat
transfer coefficient and the test-adjusted condenser
steampressure at thedesignreference conditions. where
Thedesignreference conditions are determined
from manufacturer'sdata.Calculatedvalues, not
includedwith the data, are computed usingthe u* = c? (5.2.7)
A, * LMTD*
same procedures as developed in Subsection 5.1,
but substituting the design values for the test values.
5.2.1TubewallResistance. The tubewall resistance
is a constant which is dependent only on the tube-
wall thicknessandmaterial.Accordingly,
28
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=Tenaga nasional Berhad/5969199001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/03/2007 20:35:10 MDT
S T D - A S M E P T C 1 2 - 2 - E N G L 1978 W 0757b70 Ob05037 771
The
saturation
steam
temperature
corresponding
to pressure Pj is determined from the ASME Steam
Tables. [21
If the test condition steam flow rate, W;, is not
5.2.4ShellsideResistance. l h e shellsidecondens- available, the expression W:/W may be substituted
ing heattransfer is the mostcomplexcomponent with Q+/Q*. The liquid propertiesareevaluated at
in theevaluationof a steamsurfacecondenser. the bulk average temperature of the condensatefilm.
Numerous correlations of the Nusselt equation have
This temperature can be approximated as follows:
been developed for the film coefficient for various
condensing situations. These correlations are based
on specificcondensing conditionsrequiring ade-
v = T: - 0.2 * LMTD* (5.2.1 3)
tailed knowledge of the shell and tube nest geome-
triesandthecondensingconditionsand resulting and
in significantly different prediction values of the heat
transfer coefficient. As a result, the test value of the T; = T: - 0.2 * LMTD' (5.2.14)
shellsideresistance is determined in para. 5.1.6
based on the difference between the test calculated 5.2.5 Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient. The over-
overallheattransfercoefficientandsumof the all heat transfercoefficient (OHTC),which is adjusted
calculated values for the other heat transfer resist- to thedesignconditions, is as follows:
ances.
In order to adjustthetestshellsideresistance
value to the design condition, some formulation is
necessary to correct for the difference in condensate
film temperature between design condition and test
condition. Because this requires an adjustment over
a limited range of conditions, rather than aprediction 5.2.6
Adjusted
Test
CondenserSteamPressure.
of an absolute value of the shellside resistance, very The test condenser steam pressure,which is adjusted
precisepredictions are notrequired.TheNusselt to thedesignreferenceconditions, i s determined
equation used herein provides for film condensation using the following procedure:
on theoutside of horizontal tube bundles,and is
expressed as follows:
U* * A*
NTUO = -
c; * W*
(5.2.1 6)
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(5.2.9)
Noting that
Theadjusted steampressure, P?, corresponding to
thesaturation steamtemperature, T f , as calculated
fromthe above, is determined from ASME Steam
(5.2.1 O)
Tables. [2]
5.2.7 Evaluation of Results/Acceptance Criterion.
then The difference between the test adjusted and design
reference steampressures is evaluated as follows:
(5.2.1 1)
If thepressuredifference is greaterthanorequal
to zero, the condenser performance is satisfactory
Combining equations 5.2.9 and 5.2.1 1, and considered acceptable. If the pressure difference
29
30
where Q = Qx + Oy + 0,
AT, = (Ar)(%);
1
Rr,y = -
i
c Rty,;
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
31
1 If the calculated
condensate
subcooling
testat condi-
tion is less than or equal to design value, this aspect
ofthecondenserperformance i s satisfactoryand
considered acceptable. If it is greater than the design
value,thecondenser perforknce i s worse than
designand is consideredunacceptable.
Rf,Y,i = ($)( In (
p T 9 -1 In (T5.Y - Calculations
Oxygen
Dissolved
Acceptance
5.3.3
Criterion. The dissolved
oxygentest
result shall be
T5.y - %3,i T,, - Tc,3,i determined by averaging the
measured dissolved
oxygenresultsat the specified time intervalsfor
eachcondenser outlet pipe. If theaveragedresult
is greater than the design value for any condensate
1 outlet dissolved oxygen measurement, the condenser
Rf’zri=(%)[ln (T,, - TC^,;) - (Ts,=- Tc,3,;)) performance is worse than design and is considered
T , , - %4,i T,, - Tc,4,; unacceptable.
32
TABLE 5.1
STUDENT’S t, TABLEFORTHE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL
Degrees mg- D%-
of of of
Freedom r Freedom t Freedom t
21 1 12.706
2.201 11 2.080
12 2 4.303
2.074 22 2.1 79
3 3.1 82 13 2.1 60 23 2.069
4 2.776 24 14 2.1 45 2.064
15 5 25 2.571 31 2.1 2.060
16 6 2.447 26 2.1 20 2.056
7 2.365 17 2.1 1o 27 2.052
2.306 8 o1 18 2.1 2.048 28
19 9 2.262 2.093 29 2.045
10 2.228 20 2.086 30 or 2.000
more
GENERAL NOTE:
Table gives values of t such that from -t to +t the area included is 95%.
Se’ = (@*S*)’ + (@)&,+)’ + (@&2 input test parameters. The final result referred to in
thepreceding sentence is the Codetest objective
being considered, ¡.e., thedesignreferencesteam
+ (8r;Sr;)’ + (@TiSri)2+ (@Tt $T;,>’ (5.4.3)
pressure, subcooling, dissolved oxygen, or tubeside
pressuredrop.The ratio of the change in the per-
+ (@r;,&:,>’ + (@T;,cSri,c)2+ (@Tz,~ST~,~)~ turbed parameter to the change in the output is the
sensitivity factor for that particular parameter.
The methodology and procedures for estimating the Sensitivity factors can also be obtained analytically
bias limits and calculating the precision indices for by partial differentiation of the equationsused in
each of theindependentmeasurementparameters computing the results. The equations to be used in
are provided in ASME PTC 19.1 [4] and are therefore thecomputationofeachof the sensitivityfactors
not repeatedhere. Also note that correlatedbias follow. In deriving these sensitivity factor equations,
analysis is beyond the scope of the current Code. it is assumedthat the error in the calculated fluid
Student’s t factor, G, is defined in PTC 19.1 [4] and steam properties (heat capacity, density, viscos-
and is a function of the degrees of freedom (¡.e., ity, etc.) due to errors in the measurement parameters
one less than the number of observations taken for aresmall,whencompared to the effect of these
a givenmeasuredparameter). A table of r factors measurement parameters on the overall test uncer-
is given in Table 5.1. If the number of observations tainty. Accordingly, these sensitivity factors neglect
is greater than 30, the t factor can be taken as 2.0. fluid property error effects.
The r factor is used to convert standard deviations Sensitivity Factor for Steam Flow Rate:
to 95% confidenceintervals.
5.4.2 Sensitivity Factors. The sensitivity factors (O),
used in the above,can be determined by either of
the following techniques.
The centraldifference method canbeemployed
with separate perturbations of the individual instru- (5.4.4)
ment uncertainties. That is, using the data reduction
proceduresandequations given previously in this
Section,compute the averagetest resultfromthe
averagetestdata.Then, using the sameequations,
systematically compute the change in the final test
resultcaused by a smallchange in each ofthe where
33
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
F1 = 0.001 6908°.02736T?
(5.4.5)
i i
i = l
LMTDE; - x
i = l
LMTD:,,
*
where
L W+ J (5.4.1 2)
(5.4.9)
_I
*f:
i= 1
- F1 * * R: * A,
F2
Sensitivity Factor for Cleanliness Factor Clean Tube
(5.4.1 O)
F3 * R: + W + * C; * ( T t - T;) Outlet Temperature:
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- 34
(5.4.1 9)
*c i=1
(5.4.20)
(S.4.16)
(S.4.18)
where B, t,, and S have the definitions of Subsection
2.4 and are determined directly from the dissolved
The sensitivity factors are as follows: oxygen instrument and number of readings.
I V v
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
35
E STEAM 12.2-1998
37
38
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
6.2.12
Fouling
Assessment
(a) Tube locations
(b) Tube inlet temperature
(c) Tube outlet temperature
6.2.13DissolvedOxygenContent in Condensate
6.2.1 4 Subcooling
6.2.15TubesidePressure Drop
6.2.16Numerical Conclusions. ThisSectionshall
include a comparison of measuredperformance to
requirements. The analysis of uncertainty of individ-
ual measurementsand overall test uncertainty.
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
39
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
To provide more guidance for the Code user, the NONMANDATORYAPPENDICES
Committee has preparedAppendices A through K.
TheseAppendicesarenonmandatoryand are pro- A Guideline:FIowchartdChecklists
vided for information. They complement and amplify B Guideline: Automatic Data Acquisition
the instruction of the main body of PTC 12.2. Their C Guideline: Performance Monitoring
review is important for a full appreciationofthe D Guideline: Example Calculations
testmethods in currentpractice. E Detail: Uncertainty
Analysis
for
Condensing
TheseAppendicesare divided into threecatego- Pressure
ries. The first category provides guidelines for proper F Detail: GeothermalSurfaceCondensers
use of the Codeand to help the testengineer G Diagnostic: Air Binding
conduct the test.Thesecondcategoryadds detail H Diagnostic: Non-Condensible Removal Equipment
to sectionsoftheCode which require supporting I Diagnostic:Tube Fouling
documentation. The final category includes diagnos- J PhysicalPropertiesof Sea Water
tic tests to assess common classes of surface con- K References
denser problems.
41
NONMANDATORYAPPENDIX A - GUIDELINE:
FLOWCHARTSKHECKLISTS
(This Appendix is not a part of PTC 12.2 and is included for information purposes only.)
43
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
44
Determine the overall scope of the test. Evaluate the specific parameters that need to be tested.
Select the most cost-effective instruments and/or methods to measure all of the necessary param-
eters.
Perform a pretest uncertainty analysis regarding the parametersto be measured.
Install instruments in asensibleorder.Begin with the pressureinstruments.Thesemust all be
calibrated at their respective locations to compensate for environmental changes.
All temperature instruments mustbe calibrated prior toinstallation, including any extension cable
associated with energized or voltage-producing sensors.
Install all temperature instruments in a logical order. Run extension wire or cable back to data-
logging device (where appropriate).
Check logging device for operation, including a continuity check on all the test parameters.
Inspect installation and assure that no open circuits and/or faulty ground loops exist.
When all channels are properly working (data logger use only) begin pressure calibration.
At this point check all local instruments for proper operation; calibrate where appropriate (thermo-
couples, gages, transducers, etc.).
Make certain that all calibrations are clearly recorded and traceableto an accepted standard.
After calibrating, checkfor measurement feasibility by logging all pressures, flows, and temperatures
at the operational conditions.
Correct any problems with instruments, loggers, and associated hardware.
Conduct a preliminary test as close to the agreed-upon operational requirements as possible. (1
hr max) Check all average values for feasibility.
If all equipment functions correctly prepare
for the performance test. Coordinateall efforts through
the operating department and the designated parties.
Make certain that any cycle isolation that needs doing is taken care of prior tostarting.
If a separatecooling-water flow test is to be conducted simultaneously, coordinatewith alltesting
parties.
Consider any special cycle isolation necessary to conduct concurrent tests.
unit load or steam
Prepare a test schedulewith alltestingloperating parties. Include start/stop times,
flow, operating requirements, and any other pertinent information regarding the operation of the
condenser. Incorporate these into a logical and achievable test schedule.
Follow the test schedule and begin testing.
Make any schedule changes necessary to meet the scope and objectives of the test. Keep a test
log to document any deviations from thetest plan or the original testing schedule.
45
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Evaluate the
apparatus being Meet with Agree on a
tested (review responsible site-specific
size, location, and c parties; begin ). scope and
ease of instrument to prepare a objective to
installation) test plan conduct test
1
I
Discuss and Determine the Investigate the
determine all
operational
D-
specific test
criteria used r
-
r
possibility of
using station
in the final instruments
requirements
evaluation
I
+
Calibrate and
use plant
Install
instruments
I
Prepare a
instrumentation
where
* in the order * site-specific
checklist
given in the for the test
appropriate test plan plan
Check all
Calibrate all Compose a instruments prior
instruments to the actual test
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
mutually
and field
check all
D- agreed-upon + by conducting a
preliminary test
test schedule
connections (1 hr m a ) *
"After unit has
reached stability"
J
$.
Prepare all necessary Verify that enough
data sheets for back personnel are
up or general available for START TEST
information (Control conducting and "Follow
room readings, assisting during the schedule in
station instruments, test (assure unit test plan"
etc.) 'Note any stability, follow
deviations from the test schedule) "Log
original test plan' any changes"
46
Condenser cooling
water flow
detemination
L-
(instNments/methodS
of recommended
accuracy)
Are taps
Outside
expertise is vendor/engineer on the accuracy
usually expertise will and or
usually found be necessary reliability
within the required
organization
c
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
No
The proper number
of sampling points Cost effective
Will require when installed
must be determined access to installation
(choose the in smaller pipe
condenser may require diameters
appropriate waterbox or calibration
distribution for
sampling) ~~ ~
(Dierential
producer) quare
Dilution Black box root extraction and
calculations computation direct reading linearization
must be needed for final device (certain needed for final
pelformed to determination inputs are interpretationin
determine flow engineering units
The appropriate
The appropriate The appropriate choice for this
choice for this The appropriate
choice for this application is the choice for this
application is a application is lhe
dye dilutionflow permanent or application ist h e
pitot tube traverse; portable ultrasonic orifice or nozzle;
determination;
overall accuracy 'flow meter'; *overall accuracy'
overall accuracy
2570 (Of flow)
2370 (of now)
overall accuracy =2% (of flow)
=S% (of flow)
47
4 A A
v
Recommended Recommended
accuracy accuracy
1 Yes
Local indication
with local common, high-speed
and remote data collection contained
indicators or difficult or not (needs no
applicable power source)
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Local
acquisition indication m
indlcation
needed? only?
1'"" lNo
Adaptable to
process Can be
instrumentation
external power into a process a local process
needed instrument
No extensive
available for experience is during test can
needed for only be done on
installation a manual basis
4 Yes
I
Durable under
Is cost a contained most
governing power source environmental
factor? not necessary lest conditions
The appropriate
The appropriate choice for this The appropriate
choice for this application is choice for this
application IS application is
capillary fluid
transducerhransmittey vacuum gauges; mechanical gauges;
overall accuracy overall accuracy overall accuracy
f 0.25% (range)
20.1% (range)
48
This Appendix is a guide for the implementation (b) Flexible network whichcan analyzesensor and
of an automatic Data Acquisition System (DAS). The acquisition faults.
DAS can enhance data collection and analysis. The (c) Flags and alarms for out-of-range values.
DAS can accomplish the following: (d) Graphics for data trending and results presen-
(a) Simultaneous reading andrecording of all data tation.
points. (e) Mass data storage and ease of data retrieval.
(b) Providedata collection frequencyexceeding (0 Ease of calculation development and export data
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
51
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
52
D.l BASIC
HEAT TRANSFER RELATIONS
D.1.1 Condenser Heat Load. Thecondenserheat load at the test conditions is computed as follows:
where
= 1.4687E + 08 Ib/hr
D.1.2 Overall Heat TransferCoefficient. The overall heattransfer coefficient at the test conditions is
computed as follows:
U' = Q'
A, * LMTD+
53 --``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Design Conditions
Inlet CS temp ("F) 65
Outlet CW temp ("F) 80.6
CW flow (gpm) 280000
CW flow (Ib/hr) 1.3989E + 08
Cleanliness factor (%) 85
Condenser pressure (in. . HgA) 1so
Condenser pressure (psia) 0.74
Heat load (Btu/hr) 2.1 760E + O9
Tubeside pressure drop (it water) 14.5
Condensing flow (Ibhr) 22221 85
where
LMTD+ =
( T t - T;)
-
- (90.7 - 74.9) = 17.1'F (D.1.3)
In - In (101.14 - 74.9)
( TT;; -
- TT$
T) 101.14 - 90.7
and
T; = f { Q } = 101.14OF
R; = d, 0.875 (D.1.4)
24 * k; * In($) = 24 * 26.00
D.1.4 Tubeside Resistance. The tubeside heat transfercoefficient calculation is taken from Rabas and Cane. (11
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- 54
TABLE D.2
TEST DATA
Standard Number Average Measurement
Value Point Test Measurement Deviation
Inlet CW temp ("F) 50 0.1 1 60 75.0
2 60 74.9 0.143
Average 74.9
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
7 89.5 60 0.456
8 87.0 60 0.327
Average 90.7
0.373
2.005°.373 0.777°.'65
= 0.0451
(0.3539°.538 * 62.19°.835 * 0.998°-462) * 7.500.835
where
W+
v+ =
3600 * P+ * Ai
55
TABLE D.3
STEAM AND WATER PROPERTIES
Design Test
CONDENSER STEAM PROPERTIES
Condenser Pressure (in. Hga) 1.S 22.0
Condenser Sat. Temp. ("F) 91.72 101.14
Density (Ib/ft3)* 0.0022 0.0029
TABLE D.4
F O U L I N G RESISTANCE DETERMINATION TEST
Tube Tl J2 Tf J, Rf
Set "F "F "F OF hr . f t 2 . "F/Btu
~ ~~~ ~ ~~
1 74.9 101.14
93.1 91.9 0.0001 83
74.9 2 101.14
93.7 92.3 0.000205
74.9 3 101.14
93.8 92.3 0.000218
74.9 4 101.14
93.4 91.9 0.000226
5 74.9 101.14
93.2 91.6 0.000247
6 74.9 101.14
93.1 91.4 0.000266
74.9 7 101.14
93.9 92.6 0.0001 86
74.9 8 101.14
94.0 92.8 0.0001 69
9 74.9 101.14 92.3 93.9 0.000232
10 74.9 101.14
93.8 92.0 0.000266
11 74.9 101.14
93.2 91.5 0.000264
12 74.9 101.14
93.0 91.4 0.000252
13 74.9 101.14 91.5 93.2 0.000264
14 74.9 101.14
93.1 91.3 0.000283
Avg. 0.000233
56
1 l4
Rf = - 2 RX; = 0.000233
14 i = 1
hr-ft2-OF/Btu (D.1.7)
="
564.1 3
0.0001 -
6656 0.00057987 (0:;);)
-- 0.0002330
R: = R+, = 0.00016656
hr-ft*-"F/Btu
(D.2.1)
2.275°.373 0.777°.'65
= 0.0451
(0.3489°.538* 62.28°.835 * 0.999°,462) * 7.14°.835
where
W*
v* =
3600 * P* * A;
57
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
where
u* = Q*
A, * LMTDt
2.1 760E + O9
- (D.2.5)
239,476 * 17.80
= 51 0.56 Btu/hr-ft2-"F
(D.2.6)
Tf = f { @ ) = 91.72"F
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
from ASME Steam Tables. [2]
D.2.4 ShellsideResistance. Theshellsideresistanceadjusted to thedesignconditions is determined as
follows:
l . Calculatethecondensate film temperatureatdesign condition as
= 88.16"F
T f = T: - 0.2 * LMTD+
= 97.72OF
58
85
(
= 0.00072 * 24083 1 4
22221
)'".(--)'"*
1.6956
1.8923
(-)0.36309
0.35908 * (G)
62.138 'I3
1
uO=
R& + Rf' (2) +R? + R$
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1
0.0001 6656 + 0.000637 - + 0.00029379 + 0.000706
(0.777)
U,* A,
NTUO = -
G*@
59
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=Tenaga nasional Berhad/5969199001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/03/2007 20:35:10 MDT
S T D - A S M E P T C 12.2-ENGL L778 m 0757b70Ob050bb 7LT m
D.2.7 Evaluation of Results. The difference between the test adjusted and design reference steam pressures
areevaluated as follows:
,
- 5.7 (1.3989E + 08)'.8
1.4687E + 08
(D.3.1)
D.4
UNCERTAINTY
ANALYSIS
D.4.1Uncertainty in TestAdjustedSteamPressure
D.4.1.1 Sensitivity Factors. The sensitivity factors are computed by substituting the design and test values
into theequations provided in Subsection 5.4.
Sensitivity Factor for SteamFlow Rate:
(O; .3
;3 R:) psia
0,: = F, * F2 * = 1.7942E - 08 -
Ib/hr
(D.4.1)
where
F1 = 0.001 69OeO.O2'36@
60
(D.4.3)
e,+ =
-+ 0.835 *
R: (2) +R!]
psia
= -1.2662E - O9 -
Ib/hr
(D.4.4)
F1 * F2 * R: 1 R!
@T; =
R: (-)
u+* In T: - T t (T: - T;) TZ - T;
T: -Ti
61
where
1
f3 =
0.001 690
(D.4.8)
D.4.1.2 Bias Limits and Precision Indices. The bias limits and theprecisionindices for each of the
measuredparametersaredetermined in accordance with the methodologyprescribed in ASME PTC 19.1.
62
[41 The values in Table D.5 are provided for example purposes only. Although these values are typical for
atestconducted in accordance with this Code, actual valuesmust be determined for aspecific test and
will depend on thecondenserdesign,theinstrumentationused, and theoperatingconditionsatthe time
of the test.For this example,thebias limits and precision indices are as follows:
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Bias Limit:
(D.4.13)
= 0.001 psia2
847
and
BQ = 20.043 psia
Precision Index:
(D.4.14)
= 4.914E-O5 psia’
and
63
Se = ?0.0070 psia
Combined Uncertainty:
Based on the number of readings for each measurement parameter, as provided in Table D.2 for this sample
calculation, the pooled degrees of freedom was determined to be greaterthan 30; therefore,theStudent's
t-valuefromTable 5.1 is 2.00. Thecombineduncertainty is thendetermined as follows:
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
= 4 0.0432 + (2 * 0.0070)2 (D.4.15)
= 20.044 psia
= - - -14'2
- - 0.90446 (D.4.16)
hP: 15.7
1.8 * AP", -
- 1.8 * 14.2
ow+= (D.4.17)
W+ 1.4687€+08
ft Water
= 1.7403 E-O7 - Ib/hr
B A C = -d ( @ A P ; 6 d p d 2 +(@w+Bw+)2
64
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
65
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
66
NONMANDATORYAPPENDIX E - DETAIL:
UNCERTAINTYANALYSIS FOR CONDENSINGPRESSURE
(This Appendix is not a part of PTC 12.2 and is included for information purposes only.)
67
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(E.1.3)
(E.l.ll)
Uo * A,
NTUO = -
c; * W *
(E.1.4)
( T t , ;- Tt,,;)
LMTD:,; = (E.1.12)
*($*(F) * [E]
(P*) 2/3
ap;
dPF = (-)cfT,O
a T;
and
R : = " - u+
R1 f , - R ; ( ? ) - R j (E.1.7)
(E.1.13)
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
dp.165 * w+ -0.835
(S) TZ - T:
= 1 - e-NTUo
where the outside effective area of each one of the
fouledorcleantesttubesdivided by itsheatpick-up (Note thatand Tj are exactdesignvalues;there-
is considered to approximately
equal
fore,
their
partial
derivatives
are
equal
zero.)
to From
A & + , then, Eq. E.1.4:
68
where
/hr-ft2-"F\
F2 = (S) (-) =
a NTUO
* (F
* ) r$)
or
P-\
hr-ft2-"F
' Btu '
Thederivationofthe
mainingparameters
sensitivity factors for there-
follows, beginning with Eq. --``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
E.1.7.
From Eq. E.1.6:
(dRa2 = (-)aR:
aR:
(dQ2 (E.1.15)
where
69
1 R:
(E.1.22)
Evaluation of the partial derivative termsof Eq.
E.1.19 first requires substitution of Equations E.1.11
and E.1.12 into Eq. E.l. O,l and then substitution of
Eq. E.1.8,E.1.9, and E.l.10 into Equation E.1.7.The
resulting equationcanthenbesolved for each of
the partial derivatives. These derivativesandthe
(T)
resulting sensitivity factors follow.
Sensitivity Factor for Circulating Water Flow: Sensitivity Factor for Outlet Water Temperature:
aR:
”
a
-
(2
u++ 0.835R:
W+
(2)
+ R);
-_[
a RT: ;
U+ * In i-)
T: - TT
T: -
-1
(T; - G)
T; - T;
+ (%* 3 (E.1.20)
which is equal to
(!$) (E.1.23)
o,+ = Fl * F, * R: (E.1.21)
Sensitivity Factor for Steam Pressure:
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
R: r
70
[ c-72
c-77
W*ln(-)~C-G)("
72-77
1 E.1.14, and E.1.16:
- Fl * f2 * R: * A,,
f3 * R: * W+ * c; * - c) (c (E.1.24)
l . I ($)
Sensitivity Factor for Cleanliness Factor Clean Tube
Sensitivity Factor for Cleanliness Factor FouledTube Inlet Temperature:
Inlet Temperature:
Then applying Eq. E.1.20 and combining Eqs. E.1.13, Then applying Eq. E.1.20 and combining Eqs. E.1.13,
E.1.14, and E.1.16: E.1.14, and E.1.16:
Sensitivity Factor for Cleanliness factor Fouled Tube Sensitivity Factor for Cleanliness Factor Clean Tube
Outlet Temperature: Outlet Temperature:
71
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(E.2.1)
(E.2.2)
72
NONMANDATORYAPPENDIX F - DETAIL:
GEOTHERMAL SURFACE CONDENSERS
(This Appendix is not amandatorypart of PTC12.2,SteamSurfaceCondensers;andisincluded for informationpurposesonly.)
73
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
75 --``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Tubesheet
Plastic
bellmouth
f"Flow
76
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=Tenaga nasional Berhad/5969199001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/03/2007 20:35:10 MDT
S T D * A S M E P T C 1 2 - 2 - E N G L 1778 m 0757b70 Ob05082 Ob2 m
NONMANDATORYAPPENDIX H - DIAGNOSTIC:
NON-CONDENSIBLEREMOVALEQUIPMENT
(This Appendix is notapart of PTC 12.2 and is included for informationpurposesonly.)
77
where
P= density of gas at actual condition (Ib/ft3)
d= orifice diameter in (in.)
AH= differential pressure(in. of H20)
ß= beta ratio (orifice dialpipe dia.)
where PT= total pressure of mixture (psia)
W,= unit weight of vaporper unitweight of P,,= partial pressure of water in mixture (psia)
non-condensible. T= temperature of mixture ("F)
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
78
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=Tenaga nasional Berhad/5969199001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/03/2007 20:35:10 MDT
NONMANDATORYAPPENDIX I - DIAGNOSTIC:
TUBE FOULING
vhis Appendix is not a part of PTC 12.2 and is included for information purposes only.)
79
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
81
Temperature, F'
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Temperature, F'
GENERAL NO=
The normalseawater concentration used in this
chart has 34.483 g of solids per 1000 g seawater.
82
Temperature, "F
Temperature, "F
30 40 60 80 100 120 140
0.41
0.40
0.39
c
0.33
0.32
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
0.31
30 40 60 80 100 120 140
Temperature, "F
GENERAL NO=
The normal seawater concentrationused in this
chart has 34.483g of solids per 1000 g seawater.
84
TemDerature. F
.-im5
O
V
m
5
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Temperature, 'F
85
[ll Rabas,T.J.,Oane, D., “AnUpdate of lntube PTC 19.5, lnstruments and Apparatus: Part Il
ForcedConvectionHeatTransferCoefficient with of Fluid Meters [1972]
Variable
Physical Properties,’’
Advances in Heat PTC 19.22, Digital Systems Techniques [1986]
Transfer, Vol. 6, pp. 503-564, 1970. PTC 24, Ejectors [1976]
[2] Meyer,C.A.etal, ASME SteamTables.Third [51 Heat ExchangeInstituteStandards for Steam
Edition, The American Society of Mechanical Engi- SurfaceCondensers, 9thEdition, 1995.
neers, New York, NY, 1993. [61 Standard Methodsfor the Examination of Water
[3] Taborek, l., Design Methods For Heat Transfer andWastewater, 17th Edition, 1985.
Equipment, in Heat Exchangers: Design and Theory [7] H.S. Bean (editor), FluidMeters:Their Tbeory
Sourcebook, ed. by Afgan, .N. andSchlunder, E., and Application, sixth edition, The American Society
HemispherePublishing Company, 1974.
ofMechanical Engineers, New York, N Y 1971.
141 Performance Test Codes, The American Society
[8] Now Measurements in SanitarySewers by
of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY:
PTC 2, Definitions andValues [1980]
Dye Dilution, Monograph, SS 7-80, Turner Designs,
Sunnyvale,CA, 1980.
PTC 6, SteamTurbines [1996]
PTC 9, DisplacementCompressors,Vacuum [9] Smart,P.L., and I.M.S. Laidlaw, An Evaluation
Pomps,andBlowers 119701 o f FluorescentDyes for Water Tracing, Water Re-
PTC 12.3, Deaerators 119971 sourcesResearch, Vol. 13, No. 1 , February 1977.
PTC 18, Hydraulic Turbines [ 1 9921 [l O] Test Methods for Dissolved Oxygen in Water,
PTC 19.1, MeasurementUncertainty [1985] ASTMStandard D888-87.
PTC 1 9.2, lnstrurnents and Apparatus: Pressure [l 11 MFC-3M-1989, Measurement of fluid flow
Measurement [ 1 9873 inPipesUsing Orifice,Nozzle andVenturi, The
PTC 19.3, Instruments and Apparatus: Temper- AmericanSocietyofMechanical Engineers, New
ature Measurement [ 1 9741 York,NY, 1990.
--``,,,,,``,`,```,``,,```,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
87