You are on page 1of 2

MPPR1123: PROGRAM EVALUATION

Class Activity: Extract Information and Review


(Provus – Discrepancy Model)

Name: Nurul Akmar binti Said


Matrix Card No:MPP 192006
Lecturer: Dr Ibnatul Jalilah binti Yusof

Evaluation Steps

Program and
Plan The Professional Upskilling Of English Language Teachers (Pro-ETL)
Programme

The Pro-ELT Programme was designed to futher enhance the level of English
proficiency and pedagogical competence of teachers.

Define Issues New program

Define To determine whether Pro-ELT Programme can increase teachers’


Purpose of the competence
Evaluation

Model Used Provus’ Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM)

Methodology Stage Sample Instrument Data Collection


1 Programme Checklist Five components will be
managers Interview evaluated:
Protocol
Selection, facilities resources,
contact hours, teaching
learning sessions, participants’
performance

i) Interview with programme


managers
ii) Document analysis (minutes
meeting, proposal paper,
report)

Questionnaire, Interview
2 Two Checklist/Interview 2 components will be
different Protocol evaluated:
groups
(programme Selection
staff and 1. Consultant expertise
participants) 2. Staff qualifications &
experiences
3. Participants
prerequisite
requirement

Facilities & Resources


1. Training venue
suitability
2. Testing venue
equipment
3. Quality of training
module

Questionnaire, Interview
3 370 Questionnaire Two components will be
participants evaluated:
Checklist
Contact hours, and the
Field Notes teaching & learning sessions
process

Questionnaire, Interview,
Observation
4 370 Field Notes Evaluate the programme
participants output based on

The completion
Aptis Test Assignments given the results
achievement Aptis Test

Summary
This paper presented conceptual framework to evaluate the Pro-ELT
programme.
Review
This paper presented conceptual framework to improvements the Pro-ELT
programme in Rovus Model.

You might also like