Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Question #2)
In The Republic, Plato introduces the topic of education as an integral and vital part of the
larger discussion on the well-being of society itself. According to his writings, a “just” society
should seek to present the best education to all of its members, man and woman alike, stating in
Book V of The Republic, “If women are to have the same duties as men, they must have the
same nurture and education?” We gain perspective of Plato’s “model of education” from many
of his works, but particularly The Republic and The Apology. Within these dialogues, one can
attempt to gather information regarding Plato’s assumed ideal educational representation based
off of what is shown through the character of Socrates, his actions, and his words. The many
roles occurring in Plato’s assumed model are meant to work cohesively with one another to
present the ideal outcome of turning one’s soul to what truly is, giving aporia the role as a stage
of realization, a tool of humility, and a turning point within the pedagogic scheme.
difficulty understanding. To begin to form an opinion of the role of aporia, we must first
a model, one may identify the role of the teacher, the student, the relationship between the two,
and the curriculum as a whole, however, just as Socrates would seek to look past a simple
answer, one can use Plato’s dialogues to lead to understanding the role that aporia may play
Aporia can first be seen as a stage of realization in Plato’s model of Education. Within
the “Gadfly image” in The Apology, Socrates states that “he has been placed here by the Gods”
in service of the city to “sting fellow citizens and wake them up” to the question of virtue. The
sting refers to the feeling of aporia and what follows is the sense of being “woken up,” or a sense
of realization within the learner. With aporia acting as a stage of realization within Plato’s model
of education, this leads the learner (or in The Apology, Socrates’ fellow citizens) to turn in
another direction. This “direction” is the realization that one does not truly “know.” Plato writes
point that one is only wise if they know they are not wise, in the idea that “stinging” hurts
because one realizes they are not all-knowing, and within the allegory of cave, when one
ascends. Socrates’ description of the “brightness” in the cave story represents aporia which
humbles the learner into realization that their reality is not the whole reality, and that life is not
limited to their perspective alone. This idea clearly displays aporia as an act of humility to the
learner because of how the assumed “truth” is destroyed by the learners ascent to the sun or “the
good.” Furthermore, aporia creates a newfound sense of diffidence through perplexity within the
eristic characters Plato writes about, thus providing evidence of how this tool (aporia) in
education is used to humble even the most arrogant of learners. An example of this is
Thrasymachus in The Republic who is perplexed to frustration, ultimately, leading to him giving
up on the conversation! Now, what one does past the point of aporia marks how recognition
This brings aporia to its final, and most abstract, role in Plato’s education model as a
turning point for the learner. What one does past the point of aporia depends on how perspective
is influenced, leading to further ascent or, for most, descent. Thrasymachus, like many, simply
backs out due to frustration, the jury in The Apology, responds in fear and uproar by condemning
Socrates to death (similar to the apprehensive cave-dweller who threatens the returner with death
in the allegory of the cave), and the select few, the philosophers, pride themselves on the goal to
move past the point of aporia with the intent of “stinging” others. Plato gives versatility to the
role of aporia through many of Socrates’ interactions with others and their responses to this
point of perplexity. By doing so, this gives aporia the identity as a turning point for a learner in
the assumed education model. What one does past this moment, whether they refuse to
acknowledge and begin descent, or if they move to say “I myself have been stung” and “return”
to begin the journey of turning other’s souls to what is by “stinging” them, both destinations
In the end, one can only use Socrates as a simple gateway to understanding a potential
model of education itself. By using penetrating questions, Plato’s Socrates goes beneath the
surface of the things which the sense perceive and arrives at a purely intellectual concepts in both
The Apology and The Republic. Plato presents a tool of a presumed educational model with Book
VII of The Republic stating, “this is the alternative I choose,” he said, “that it is for my own sake
chiefly that I speak and ask questions and reply.” With this style of dialogue from Plato, many
times, aporia plays a role not only within the character’s interactions, but within the reader of
Plato’s works. Plato’s “aporetic” idea that turning the soul or mind around to what is real (what
most truly is) by changing its desires, not just filling someone with knowledge or filling blind
eyes with sight is an educational concept that can partially be experienced through reading about
Socrates, his stories, and his many questions. From this I am made aware that I do not truly
know, and I will not claim to know the full mystery that is aporia’s true role. I can however,
continue to participate in discourse and make the decision to move forward, despite my own
perplexity…With this in mind, pondering the question and the implementation of aporia’s role
within modern pedagogy based of off its role in Plato’s assumed model creates my question,
should students be encouraged to embrace the struggle? Should we encourage our students that
perplexity itself is realization and humility is the next step to wisdom? and should we, as
teachers, seek to “sting” our students in order to reach the potential turning point in their
educational path?