Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Stomatal transpiration of leaves is a dominant pathway of plant physiological water loss. The leaf transpiration
Transpiration rate when stomata are fully open is commonly at the same level as the evaporation rate of a wet surface of the
Stomata distribution same area as that of the leaf area, although the cumulative area of the stomatal pores is typically less than 3% of
Extremal diffusion flux the leaf area. To elucidate the highly efficient diffusion of the stomatal array from the perspective of mass
Natural optimization
transfer theory, stomatal distribution characteristics of various kinds of leaves were obtained with optical mi-
croscope, and steady diffusions of water vapor from isolated zero-depth circular stomata, elliptical stomata, and
distributed stomatal arrays without airflow parallel to the surface were simulated with the finite element
method. It was found that the long perimeter of the elliptical stomata and the specific distribution characteristics
of the stomatal array are the dominant reasons for the highly efficient diffusion of the stomatal array on the
leaves. Furthermore, the simulation results reveal that extremal transpiration rates exist for the stomatal arrays
with different distribution characteristics. It was found that the transpiration rates of the vegetation tend to
approach the extremal values for flourishing development in the process of natural optimization.
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: hye@ustc.edu.cn (H. Ye).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2019.02.004
Received 11 November 2018; Received in revised form 9 February 2019; Accepted 9 February 2019
Available online 15 February 2019
0176-1617/ © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
K. Xu, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology 234–235 (2019) 138–144
139
K. Xu, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology 234–235 (2019) 138–144
⎧ J = − D ∇C
dC
⎨ dt = −∇J = 0 (1)
⎩
where J is the diffusion flux, C is the concentration of water vapor, D is
the binary diffusion coefficient of water vapor, and t is the time. Inside a
leaf, the mesophyll cells next to the stomata are the evaporation sites of
water vapor, and the water vapor concentration in the air space of the
mesophyll tissue is approximately saturated (Farquhar and Raschke,
1978; Roth-Nebelsick, 2007). The diffusion through the stomatal tube
can be considered one-dimensional (Parkhurst, 1994; Waggoner and
Zelitch, 1965), i.e., the concentration at every cross section of the sto-
matal tube is approximately constant. Thus, the stomatal transpiration
could be assumed as water vapor diffusion from a zero-depth stomata,
which is consistent with the assumption of the diameter law (Lee and
Gates, 1964). Assuming that the concentrations of water vapor are
equal to C0 in the circular source region and 0 at an infinite point, the
boundary conditions can be given as
⎧C = C0, 0 ≤ r < h, z = 0
⎪ ∂C
= 0, r > h, z = 0
⎨ ∂z
⎪C (r , z ) → 0, when(r 2 + z 2) → ∞ (2)
⎩
where h is the radius of the circular region, and r and z are the radial
and axial coordinates, respectively. According to equation (2), the
concentration gradient of water vapor at the circular region is
∂C 2C
lim (r , z ) = − 0 (h2 − r 2)−1/2 , 0 < r < h
z→0+ ∂z π (3)
where S represents the area of the circular region. Therefore, the dif-
fusion rate Q is proportional to the concentration difference between
the source region and the infinite point. When the concentrations at the
source and the infinite point are C0 and C∞ respectively, equation (4)
can be converted into
Q = 4(C0 − C∞ ) Dh (5)
140
K. Xu, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology 234–235 (2019) 138–144
1000 μm for the same reason as that for the isolated stomata model. The based on the results exhibited in Table 1, and the ratio of area (A) to
interval (i) of the array, namely the side length of the bottom square of perimeter (P) of the vapor sources is considered as a geometrical
the array unit or the distance between the adjacent stomata, was tens to parameter establishing the relationship between A and P. The diffusion
hundreds of micrometers based on the results obtained from section rate (mol/s) is the integral of the diffusion flux (mol/m2⋅s) in the entire
2.1. It should be noted that the stomatal array in the computational vapor source. Fig. 4 represents the relationship between the diffusion
model was designed as a regular matric-like distribution pattern, which rate and A/P of the vapor sources. In this figure, eccentricity (e) re-
is a simplification of the stomatal distribution patterns of the natural presents the ratio of the distance between the two focuses and the major
leaves as shown in section 3.1. Furthermore, the zero-depth sources axis length of the elliptical sources. As can be seen, in the special case of
were adopted in these models not because of the negligence of the in- circular stomata (e = 0, A/ P = r /2) , the diffusion rate is proportional to
ternal structure of the stomata and the gradient in water vapor con- the radius of the diffusion sources, which is consistent with the theo-
centration that develops between the sites of evaporation and the sur- retical result of equation (5), indicating that the radius can be regarded
face of the leaf, but because the effect of the stomatal distribution as the characteristic length of the diffusion process of an isolated cir-
characteristics on the diffusion process was the focus of this work. The cular source.
stomata provide a boundary condition of constant water vapor con- When e is larger than zero, the diffusion sources are ellipse-shaped
centration as shown in Fig. 2. and similar to the shape of the stomata on the natural leaves. As can be
In both of the models, the temperatures in the computational do- seen from Fig. 4, for a series of elliptical sources with the same e, the
mains were set as 27°C, which is a common temperature level in the diffusion rates are proportional to A/P, indicating that A/P is appro-
natural environments. The water vapor at the diffusion sources were priate to be taken as the characteristic length of the ellipse-shaped
assumed to be saturated (C0 = 1.42 mol/m3), and the relative air hu- diffusion sources. It also can be seen that the diffusion rates of the el-
midity of the atmosphere was set as 70% (C∞ = 0.994 mol/m3), which liptical sources rise with the increasing e and are larger than that of
is also a common level during daytime in the natural environments. The circular sources (e = 0) at the same A/P. It should be noted that the
binary diffusion coefficient was set under one atmospheric pressure area of the biological internal environment exposed to the surrounding
(D = 2.6 × 10−5 m2/s). The finite element method was adopted to air for nutrient acquisition is commonly extremely limited for self-
simulate the diffusion processes of the models. protection, and the sum of all the opened stomatal area in daytime
accounts for merely 0.2 to 2% of the total area of the leaf surface; thus,
3. Results and discussion the area of the stomata should be utilized efficiently for water vapor
diffusion or CO2 uptake. Assuming a series of isolated vapor sources
3.1. Stomatal distribution characteristics of plant leaves with constant areas of 200, 400, and 600μm2 , respectively, Fig. 4 also
shows the diffusion rate of the vapor sources with the constant area and
Fig. 3 exhibits the surface topographies of seven kinds of leaves different perimeters. As can be seen, the diffusion rate of the sources
obtained in section 2.1 as examples. As can be seen, the stomata are increases with the decrease of A/P, indicating that the elliptical sources
commonly spindly and discretely distributed on the leaf surfaces. The with longer perimeter are more appropriate than the circular source for
size of the stomata and the distance between adjacent stomata represent transpiration.
the distribution characteristics of the stomatal array on the leaves. Compared with the circular source, the remarkable geometrical
Table 1 shows the mean values of the measured stomatal length (l), characteristic of the elliptic source is the longer perimeter; thus, the
stomatal width (w), and distance between adjacent stomata (d) of the diffusion characteristics of the marginal region of the vapor source
stomatal array images obtained from section 2.1. It can be seen that l should be further investigated. Assuming a circular diffusion source
distributes in the range from 9.3 to 39. 3 μm, w in the range from 2.2 to with a radius of 5 μm as an example, Fig. 5 shows the component of
9.1 μm, and d in the range from 38.9 to 121.1 μm. It should be noted diffusion flux in the diffusion region and the surrounding impermeable
that the direction distribution of the major axes of the spindly stomata region. As can be seen, in the diffusion region, there is no radial com-
is not considered in this study, and major axes of the vapor sources are ponent of diffusion flux but only axial component. The axial component
all simplified to be in the same direction in the computational model, of diffusion flux increases along the radial direction and sharply in-
whereas the direction of the stomata is randomly distributed except for creases near the edge of the diffusion region. It also can be seen that in
the Chlorophytum and Maize as shown in Fig. 3. Moreover, adjacent the surrounding impermeable region, there is no axial component but
stomatal rows can be observed on the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of only a radial component sharply increasing while approaching to the
Maize, exhibiting a unique structure of stomatal distribution. Table 1 edge of the diffusion region. This phenomenon is the so-called edge
also shows the characteristic ratios of the stomatal arrays, i.e., the ratio diffusion effect and attributed to the assumptions of the constant con-
of width to length (w/l) and the ratio of distance to length (d/l). It can centration in the diffusion region and the impermeable surface in the
be seen that w/l distributes in the range from 0.1 to 0.6, and d/l in the remaining plane region. These assumptions are appropriate because the
range from 2.6 to 9.4. It is noteworthy that the d/l of Ginkgo is 9.40, stomata are commonly micron-scale with approximately constant sa-
indicating that the stomatal density of the Ginkgo leaves is much turated water vapor in the stomatal tube and because the cuticle on the
smaller than that of the other kinds of leaves. It is also noteworthy that leaf surface is impermeable. Thus, the diffusion rates of the spindly
the stomata of the leaves were measured on the abaxial side except for stomata on the natural leaves are mainly dominated by the long peri-
in Lotus because it is an aquatic plant and the stomata are merely meter of the stomata because of the edge diffusion effect.
distributed on the adaxial side. The stomata on the adaxial sides of
Maize and Mimosa leaves were also measured to compare with the 3.3. Diffusion from distributed elliptical stomata
stomata on the opposite sides. For monocots such as Maize, the mean
size and distance between the stomata on both sides of the leaves were As the spindly stomata distribute on the leaf surfaces discretely
similar, but for dicots such as Mimosa, the distance between stomata on (Fig. 3), the relationship between the diffusion rates and the interaction
the adaxial side was much larger than that on the abaxial side. of the adjacent stomata should be further investigated by simulating the
diffusion process of the elliptical diffusion source array introduced in
3.2. Diffusion from an isolated stoma section 2.3. The length of the major axis (2a) and minor axis (2b) of the
elliptical sources correspond to the average length (l) and width (w) of
The diffusion fluxes of the isolated stomatal model were simulated the stomata, respectively, and the interval (i) of the sources in the
to investigate the relationship between the diffusion rate and the size of models correspond to the average distance (d) between the adjacent
the vapor sources. The value range of the source size was determined stomata. The ratios of semi-minor axis to semi-major axis (b/a) of the
141
K. Xu, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology 234–235 (2019) 138–144
Fig. 3. Epidermis optical micrographs of seven kinds of the leaves as examples: (a) Hedera, (b) Camphor, (c) Mimosa, (d) Lotus, (e) Chlorophytum, (f) Gingko, (g)
Maize (adaxial surface), (h) Maize (abaxial surface).
ellipse array models were determined based on the ratios of width to Different from the discussion on the diffusion from the isolated
length (w/l) of the stomata shown in Table 1 (in the range from 0.1 to sources, we focused on the average diffusion flux through the plane
0.6). It should be noted that a series of preliminary simulations in- distributed with elliptical stomata with different major axes and in-
dicated that changes in b have a slight effect on the average diffusion terval. Here, the definition of average diffusion flux is similar to that of
flux through the distributed elliptical sources because b was determined the transpiration rate of the natural leaves. It is noteworthy that the
to have a lower effect on the perimeter of the elliptical sources than a ratio of d/l was employed to describe the distribution characteristics of
when b/a was in the range from 0.1 to 0.6. Therefore, the value of b/a the stomatal array instead of stomatal density, because d/l could es-
was set as a constant of 0.5, and the influence of a on the average tablish the relationship between the size of the stomatal array and the
diffusion flux of the distributed elliptical sources was investigated in the size of the isolated stomata. The parameter of i/2a was employed for
following study. the same reason. Fig. 6a shows the average diffusion fluxes of the
142
K. Xu, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology 234–235 (2019) 138–144
Table 1
Measured stomatal parameters of the plant leaves.
leaf phenology species side stomatal parameters (μm) w/l d/l
l w d
Fig. 4. The relationships between the diffusion rates and the ratios of area to
perimeter of the elliptical sources. Eccentricity (e) represents the ratio of focal
length and major axis length of the elliptical sources. A and P represent the area
and perimeter of the elliptical sources, respectively.
Fig. 6. (a) The relationships between the average diffusion fluxes and ratios of
interval to major axis (i/2a) for distributed stomata with different major axis
(2a). (b) The extremal flux line connects the five extremal points corresponding
to (a), and the scattered points represent the stomatal distribution character-
istics of the various kinds of plant leaves. In this figure, i and 2a are equal to d
and l, respectively. The position of the point labeled with Arabidopsis was
determined with the microscopic images of stomata on the hypocotyls obtained
from the results of Wang (Wang et al., 2015).
Fig. 5. The components of the diffusion flux in and near the diffusion source elliptical array models with different 2a. As can be seen, the average
with a radius of 5 μm. The blue zone represents the axial component of the diffusion flux approaches an extremum when the elliptical array has a
diffusion flux, and the red zone represents the radial component (For inter- specific i/2a, and the specific i/2a decreases with increasing 2a. Dif-
pretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred ferent from isolated stomata, the diffusion process of a stomata in the
to the web version of this article). stomatal array would affect the water vapor concentration field near
the adjacent stomata, resulting in a decreased diffusion flux of the ad-
jacent stomata. Thus, if i/2a is too small, which means that the stomata
are too crowded, the average diffusion flux would weaken with
143
K. Xu, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology 234–235 (2019) 138–144
decreasing i/2a as shown in Fig. 6a. Furthermore, if i/2a is too large, stomatal distribution characteristics by facilitating the higher tran-
which means that the stomata are too sparse, the average diffusion flux spiration rate for flourishing development from the perspective of mass
would also weaken with increasing i/2a as shown in Fig. 6a. Thus, there transfer theory. The optimization of the stomatal distribution patterns
is an extremum when the elliptical array has a specific i/2a. It should be of the natural leaves may be the result of natural optimization and
noted that all the extrema of the average diffusion fluxes are close to artificial selection.
7.4mmol/m2⋅s , which is of the same level as the measured transpiration
rates of the natural leaves (in the range from 2 to 10 mmol/(m2·s) Acknowledgement
(Pariyar, et al., 2013; Pieruschka, et al., 2010)), indicating the relia-
bility of the calculated results of the stomatal array models. Moreover, This work was funded by the China National Natural Science
it is noteworthy that the specific values of the extremum would change Foundation (contract grant number 51576188)
with the constant temperature and relative air humidity set in the
computational models introduced in section 2.3. References
The coordinates of the five extremum points shown in Fig. 6a were
mapped in Fig. 6b by the transition of i/2a to d/l, and the corresponding Bange, G.G.J., 1953. On the quantitative explanation of stomatal transpiration. Acta Bot.
Neerl. 2, 255–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1953.tb00275.x.
five points in Fig. 6b could be connected to form an extremal flux line
Brodribb, T.J., McAdam Scott, A.M., 2011. Passive origins of stomatal control in vascular
which exhibits the optimal stomatal distribution characteristics for the plants. Science 331, 582–585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197985.
maximal average diffusion fluxes. The stomatal distribution parameters Cannon, J.N., Krantz, W.B., Kreith, F., Naot, D., 1979. A study of transpiration from
porous flat plates simulating plant leaves. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 22, 469–483.
(l and d/l) of the natural leaves shown in Table 1 are also drawn in https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(79)90013-9.
Fig. 6b. As can be seen, almost all of the points labeled with the plant Cooke, J.R., 1967. Some theoretical considerations in stomatal diffusion: a field theory
names are near the extremal flux line, indicating that the distribution approach. Acta Biotheor. 17, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01625092.
Defraeye, T., Verboven, P., Derome, D., Carmeliet, J., Nicolai, B., 2013. Stomatal tran-
characteristics of the stomata on the leaf surfaces may tend to the ex- spiration and droplet evaporation on leaf surfaces by a microscale modelling ap-
tremal flux line rather than irregular distribution. Nevertheless, the proach. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 65, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2013.05.075.
point labeled with Ginkgo is farthest away from the extremal flux line, Farquhar, G.D., Raschke, K., 1978. On the resistance to transpiration of the sites of
as illustrated in Fig. 6b. The d/l of the ginkgo is very large, which means evaporation within the leaf. Plant Physiol. 61, 1000–1005. https://doi.org/10.1104/
that the stomata on the leaf surface are too sparse or too small, resulting pp.61.6.1000.
Haghighi, E., Shahraeeni, E., Lehmann, P., Or, D., 2013. Evaporation rates across a
in the lower average diffusion flux than the extremum. It is noteworthy convective air boundary layer are dominated by diffusion. Water Resour. Res. 49,
that Ginkgo is a relict gymnosperm plant thriving in the Mesozoic era, 1602–1610. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20166.
and a high transpiration rate was not adaptive to the cold and dry Hopkins, W.G., 1999. Introduction to Plant Physiology. John Wiley and Sons.
Lawson, T., Blatt, M.R., 2014. Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on pho-
climate in the late Mesozoic era. Therefore, Ginkgo may have survived tosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiol. 164, 1556–1570. https://doi.org/
due to the sparse distribution pattern of its stomata and low tran- 10.1104/pp.114.237107.
Lee, R., Gates, D.M., 1964. Diffusion resistance in leaves as related to their stomatal
spiration rate. anatomy and micro-structure. Am. J. Bot. 51, 963–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.
Various angiosperms have flourished for more than 100 million 1537-2197.1964.tb06725.x.
years after gymnosperms. It can be supposed that the stomatal dis- Lehmann, P., Or, D., 2015. Effects of stomata clustering on leaf gas exchange. New Phytol.
207, 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13442.
tribution patterns tend to maximize the transpiration rate to match the McElwain, J.C., Yiotis, C., Lawson, T., 2016. Using modern plant trait relationships be-
more vigorous physiological activities of the plants and expand the tween observed and theoretical maximum stomatal conductance and vein density to
examine patterns of plant macroevolution. New Phytol. 209, 94–103. https://doi.
ecophysiological niche space during the natural optimization of the
org/10.1111/nph.13579.
vegetation (McElwain et al., 2016). It is noteworthy that for the annual Nobel, P.S., 1970. Introduction to Biophysical Plant Physiology.
crops such as Maize and Soybean, the corresponding stomatal para- Nobel, P.S., 1999. Physicochemical & Environmental Plant Physiology. Academic press.
Pariyar, S., Eichert, T., Goldbach, H.E., Hunsche, M., Burkhardt, J., 2013. The exclusion of
meter points are very close to the extremal flux line. The crops have ambient aerosols changes the water relations of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and
been domesticated by humans for a long period of time to produce the bean (Vicia faba) plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 88, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
economic benefit; thus, the crop seeds with the highest assimilation envexpbot.2011.12.031.
Parkhurst, D.F., 1994. Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. New Phytol. 126,
rates as well as highest transpiration rates tend to be filtered out for 449–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04244.x.
larger-scale planting. Therefore, the optimized stomatal distribution Pickard, W.F., 1981. Lumped circuit approximations for flux in systems governed by the
Laplace equation: the stoma of zero thickness. Chem. Eng. Sci. 36, 191–197. https://
patterns and the almost maximal transpiration rates of the crops may be doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(81)80063-2.
the results of natural optimization and artificial selection. Pieruschka, R., Huber, G., Berry, J.A., 2010. Control of transpiration by radiation. Proc.
Besides the plant leaves, stomata also distribute on the hypocotyls. Nati. Acad. Sci. 107, 13372–13377. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913177107.
Prado, K., Boursiac, Y., Tournaire-Roux, C., Monneuse, J.-M., Postaire, O., Da Ines, O.,
Wang investigated the influence of Brassinosteroid (BR) signals on the Schäffner, A.R., Hem, S., Santoni, V., Maurel, C., 2013. Regulation of Arabidopsis leaf
stomatal production in the hypocotyls of Arabidopsis (Wang et al., hydraulics involves light-dependent phosphorylation of aquaporins in veins. Plant
2015). Based on the microscopic images of stomata obtained by Wang, Cell 25, 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.108456.
Roth-Nebelsick, A., 2007. Computer-based studies of diffusion through stomata of dif-
stomatal length and distance between adjacent stomata are measured ferent architecture. Ann. Bot. 100, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm075.
with the Image-Pro software, and the point labeled with Arabidopsis is Roth-Nebelsick, A., Hassiotou, F., Veneklaas, E.J., 2009. Stomatal crypts have small ef-
fects on transpiration: a numerical model analysis. Plant Physiol. 151, 2018–2027.
shown in Fig. 6b as a preliminary exhibition of the relationship between https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.146969.
stomata on the hypocotyls and the extremal flux line of leaves. As can Sack, L., Holbrook, N.M., 2006. Leaf hydraulics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 361–381.
be seen, this point is far away from the extremal flux line of leaves, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144141.
Sayre, J.D., 1926. Physiology of stomata of Rumex patientia. Ohio J. Sci. 57, 233–266.
indicating the difference of distribution characteristic between stomata Stefan, J., 1882. Über die Verdampfung aus einem kreisförmig oder elliptisch begrenzten
on leaves and hypocotyls. Nevertheless, more species of plants and Becken. Ann. Phys. 253, 550–560.
Ting, I.P., Loomis, W.E., 1963. Diffusion through stomates. Am. J. Bot. 50, 866–872.
microscopic images of stomata should be investigated to clarify the
Ting, I.P., Loomis, W.E., 1965. Further studies concerning stomatal diffusion. Plant
reasons for this difference. Physiol. 40, 220–228.
Troyer, J.R., 1980. Diffusion from a circular stoma through a boundary layer: a field-
theoretical analysis. Plant Physiol. 66, 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.66.2.
4. Conclusions 250.
Waggoner, P.E., Zelitch, I., 1965. Transpiration and the stomata of leaves. Science 150,
The edge diffusion effect of the spindly micron-scale stomata and 1413–1420. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1716983.
Wang, M., Yang, K., Le, J., 2015. Organ‐specific effects of brassinosteroids on stomatal
the stomatal distribution patterns approaching the extremal flux line production coordinate with the action of TOO MANY MOUTHS. J. integ. plant biol
are the reasons for the high-efficiency diffusion characteristics of the 57, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12285.
Willmer, C., Fricker, M., 1996. Stomata Vol. 2 Springer Science & Business Media.
stomatal array of the natural leaves. The vegetation benefits from the
144