Professional Documents
Culture Documents
24 - Training Service and Maintenance PDF
24 - Training Service and Maintenance PDF
of Gas-Insulated Substations 24
Peter Glaubitz, Carolin Siebert, and Klaus Zuber
Contents
24.1 Training of Operation Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462
24.2 Operational Aspects and After Sales Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462
24.3 Types of Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462
24.4 Maintenance Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463
24.5 Operation and Maintenance Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464
24.5.1 Operational and Maintenance Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464
24.5.2 Operational and Maintenance Opening Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 466
24.5.3 Substation Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469
24.6 Special Aspects of Repair Maintenance after Major Dielectric Failure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470
24.7 Basic Input Data and Additional Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471
24.7.1 Information to Be Given by the User and the Manufacturer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472
24.7.2 Additional Recommendations for the User and the Manufacturer . . . . . . . . . . . 472
24.8 General Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474
24.9 Training for Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475
24.10 Training for Operating and Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475
24.11 Specialized Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
24.12 Information to Be Given by the User and the Manufacturer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
24.12.1 Basic Users Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
24.12.2 Basic Manufacturers Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477
P. Glaubitz (*)
GIS Technology, Energy Management Division, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany
e-mail: peter.glaubitz@siemens.com
C. Siebert
Energy Management, Siemens AG, Berlin, Germany
e-mail: carolin.siebert@siemens.com
K. Zuber
Energy Division, Gas Insulated Switchgear, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany
e-mail: zuber.scott@t-online.de
(a) Inspection carried out at frequent (specified) intervals and including checks (for
any abnormal indications) without any need for an outage
(b) Scheduled maintenance, which usually consists of:
• Routine Scheduled Maintenance – carried out regularly at intervals of
5–10 years if the limit number of mechanical CO switching operations
and/or the cumulative energy switched is not exceeded. This includes work
which does not cause enclosures to be opened (dismantling) and
• Overhaul Maintenance – carried out at intervals of 25 years or more or upon
accumulation of the permissible number of switching operations and includ-
ing opening some gas compartments (dismantling)
The recent trend has been towards Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) and/or
Reliability Centered Maintenance, which is similar to Scheduled Maintenance but
24 Training, Service, and Maintenance of Gas-Insulated Substations 463
Users should cost their maintenance activities over the expected GIS lifetime.
Generalization is not possible, but it is likely that, in the event the user is less
experienced and/or the utility has not yet established a maintenance support organi-
zation, one option for maintenance (namely, major repair and corrective types,
necessary spares included) would be to contract this to the manufacturer or a third
party. Some issues to be considered in deciding whether to subcontract maintenance
are as follows:
The following steps are to be considered when designing operation and maintenance
provisions.
Though basic considerations are similar to AIS rules, there are some items typical
for GIS. They concern, namely, the following:
• A main option which does not require degassing is the provision of a sufficient
number of permanently installed, electrically (as well as mechanically)
interlocked, earthing switches at all possible locations where they may be
required within the GIS to allow appropriate maintenance earthing. For this
function both types of earthing switch are suitable, i.e., those with capability to
close onto a short circuit (high speed earthing switches) and those without this
capability (slow-operation types).
24 Training, Service, and Maintenance of Gas-Insulated Substations 465
Note:
In the use of non-short circuit making earthing switches, there is a remote
possibility that if the appropriate operational permit system and interlocking chain
are incorrectly performed then a non-short circuit making earthing switch could be
closed onto a live busbar, thus inducing an internal fault with consequential loss of
availability of plant and potential operator danger. If the possibilities of such an
incorrect earthing switch operation, although small, are unacceptable, then a further
option is the application of short circuit making earthing switches at least at line
entries or throughout the GIS.
The overall design of the GIS and each of the primary components should be such as
to allow the removal of any defective component with the minimum of disturbance
to the adjacent components and preferably without requiring an outage of more than
one section of busbar and of one circuit, depending on the specific busbar configu-
ration. The GIS manufacturer should provide user guidance on the methods of
achieving this requirement at various locations in the GIS.
The extent of zones which may require an outage coupled with their outage
duration represents a very complex issue which depends, in general, on the design
and configuration of the substation. It is particularly necessary to pay special
attention to the following:
(a) Single-line diagram design – Busbar scheme and number of all switching
devices
(b) Configuration and layout design
• Design and installation of earthing switches
• Optimization of transversely removable enclosure sections
(c) Gas segregation of gas compartments, internal design of main conductors and
joints, and shape and fixing of barriers
(d) Operational and maintenance access
(e) Substation equipment
Provided that the enclosure is designed and tested according to IEC 62271–203,
CENELEC, or pressure vessel regulations and cast-resin partitions are designed and
tested with the minimum requirements of CENELEC standard EN 50089, the
following procedures, in addition to normal safety procedures and outage require-
ments, are recommended:
(a) Dismantling procedures for routine and major maintenance in compartments
without internal arc
24 Training, Service, and Maintenance of Gas-Insulated Substations 467
• The segregation of gas zones should comply with the protection philosophy and
match the parts of GIS which will be disconnected in the event of a failure.
• Easy location and isolation of major and/or minor failures normally requires a
higher number of gas compartments than for operational considerations alone.
• Lower probability of premature pressure relief device operation in the event of
internal failure calls for a reduced number of gas compartments with larger gas
volumes.
• Circuit-breakers should be accommodated in a gas zone independent of other
equipment.
It is obvious that these requirements are in conflict. The final solution will result
from the optimization process.
Furthermore, traditional maintenance philosophies applied to AIS for the isola-
tion of a circuit or component based solely on the electrical single-line drawing
requirements are no longer adequate for GIS, since gas compartment segregation
does not necessarily match the primary component physical positioning.
• SF6 must never be removed from a gas compartment which is still energized.
• In the event that SF6 gas must be removed from a gas compartment accommo-
dating two or more devices, conventional electrical isolation points may overlap,
requiring an enlargement of the section to be isolated.
468 P. Glaubitz et al.
As it has already been mentioned above, the basic segregation based on gas-tight
isolation zones with different disconnection logic during an internal fault might not
be sufficient. In addition, in view of GIS design and/or because of local safety
regulations, the SF6 gas pressure must be reduced to a certain safety margin in one or
more of the compartments adjacent to that one which must be opened or
disassembled for work (and/or the adjacent compartment must be opened, too).
The consequences are obvious: Gas compartments at atmospheric SF6 or air
pressure are not able to perform their dielectric functions. If this rule affects a
disconnector, then another disconnector in series will have to take over its function
and a deenergized zone will be extended.
Similar situations can be observed if too many earthing switches are included in a
disconnector chamber (one compartment) or if there are no transversely removable
enclosures installed in the GIS configuration. The effects of these conditions differ
very much in accordance with various manufacturers’ designs, single-line diagrams,
and layouts. The user must be aware of such GIS service restrictions and must weigh
his service requirements and their cost penalty. The manufacturer’s assistance and an
optimization process are necessary.
Routine maintenance should avoid outages. The optimum conditions for major or
repair maintenance (i.e., only one circuit and/or one busbar out of service) may be
achieved but at significant additional cost. The user and the manufacturer should agree
on the number of simultaneously switched-off circuits. Those which are critical for
network operation should not be located in adjacent GIS bays. In a double busbar
scheme, a fault in a busbar selector disconnector should not require the outage of the two
busbars at the same time. The GIS scope of supply must include covers and shields
permitting operation of a busbar or a circuit with some power components removed.
Methods of achieving specific conditions at different GIS compartments (as well as
special tools if needed) should be described (delivered) in manufacturer’s manuals.
Note: Provided the CENELEC standard for insulators (EN 50089) is fulfilled, no
pressure reduction is necessary in adjacent chambers. Mechanical impacts on a
pressurized castresin insulator must be avoided at all times.
the ground level represent additional costs for various types of external interconnections
(gas pipes, cabling, etc.). As there is an extremely low frequency of “manual” GIS
operations, these additional costs do not appear justified. The same concerns additional
costs for such provisions as permanently installed ladders or walkways.
Operational and maintenance access to SF6 filling points is strongly influenced by
the design of segregation and interconnection of gas zones described already in
▶ Sect. 18.2.2.
In general, easy access to gauges and gas filling points should be provided. On the
other hand, from the sealing point of view, piping should be minimized. Problems
could arise in the bringing of gas filling points to ground level due to the need to
incorporate additional piping and couplings, which may in themselves, induce
leakage. If it is accepted that with modern equipment gas leakage rates are very low
and the need for access to filling points during the normal life of the equipment is very
rare, such access can be gained from a transportable platform or similar temporary
means. The final solution has to be agreed between user and manufacturer.
Accessibility can be improved at a relatively low incremental cost if maintainabil-
ity considerations are taken into account in the initial design. Use of indoor GIS,
provision of strategically located dismantling components, provision of cranes or
specially built lifting and handling equipment, and properly designed supporting steel
structures will enhance total accessibility. A higher number of complex dismantling
enclosures is the best solution in the case of high GIS outage costs; standard chambers
with a component that can be cut for removal and the use of flexible insertion parts for
reassembly usually offers an alternative, less costly, solution.
available. This probability depends on the failure rate, on the repair and/or replace-
ment time, and on the number of GIS substations in service.
A more subjective approach is one based on users experience and manufacturers’
recommendations. Some factors to be considered in such an approach are the:
The manufacturer should provide, if required, spare parts that can be used without
complex assembly and that are only available in the factory.
If the user does not intend to “pool” or stack spare parts, the long-term availability
of spare parts beyond the expected productive life of the equipment should be
discussed with the manufacturer.
For geographically remote locations, or where travel and importation is restricted,
local storing of key components (in particular the main parts of such switching
devices as circuit-breakers, disconnectors, earthing switches, or operating mecha-
nisms) is recommended. Specifically designed kits for emergency repairs by less
well-trained personnel can provide a means of temporarily restoring limited opera-
tion until a complete repair can be effected.
Although the probability of a major failure of GIS is very low generally, the
disruptive impact on service quality of a failure in a GIS substation will justify
some special effort towards its prevention and/or speedy repair in the initial design of
GIS. Failures can be prevented by the use of condition monitoring or diagnostic
techniques, and these are being developed to detect incipient faults and to simplify
the process of replacement of a potentially faulty component under controlled
24 Training, Service, and Maintenance of Gas-Insulated Substations 471
conditions. The time and effort involved in fault location, access thereto, parts
replacement, and restoration of service will vary widely in terms of tens of hours
(depending on the complexity, size, and design of the GIS). The location of the GIS
also influences repair time, e.g., the distance from the manufacturer, customs clear-
ance times, etc. The manufacturer’s assistance is usually required in this case, and
the manufacturer’s response time should be agreed in advance.
Special attention should be paid to fault location aspects. As with all other aspects
related to GIS, fault location must be discussed with the manufacturer in the early
design stages. If there is no external sign of dielectric failure (such as response of a
pressure relief device operation and following gas drop), commonly used electrical
relays (protection systems) are able to provide only an approximate idea of the actual
place of failure, limited to an area which is covered by their function. Identification
of the specific failed gas compartment usually calls for special measures, the extent
of which depends on technical-economical optimization, and normally necessitates
the manufacturer’s guidance.
The following measures can be taken to locate the fault and thus to minimize total
outage time: Advanced protective relaying with supervising (registration) functions,
internal on-line monitoring systems, gas sampling, high-voltage testing, optical
sensors, temperature-sensitive paints, electromagnetic fault location systems, acous-
tic detectors, etc.
Special attention should be paid to SF6 handling and recycling. After an internal arc, the
gas contains SF6 decomposition by-products; other by-products will occur after pressure
relief device operation. For SF6 handling, see ▶ Chap. 23 for recycling procedures.
In order to confirm the integrity of the insulation medium after major work on
GIS, it is advisable to retest the dielectric strength of the affected portion of the
substation. Instances which could result in the advisability of a retest are:
The repeating of an AC dielectric test can be an expensive and complex task on GIS
which has already been put into service. The necessity of a retest must therefore be
carefully evaluated, along with the advice of the manufacturer, against the risk associ-
ated with not performing a retest. The regular maintenance or overhaul procedures
associated with GIS do not normally require a follow-up dielectric withstand retest.
Special attention should be paid by the user to the following additional data:
Basic input data given by a user in his enquiry and basic input data given by a
manufacturer in his tendering specification serve for system planning and technical-
economical optimization of a specific GIS design. They should include the following
(The minimum of data is marked *):
User’s data necessary for manufacturer’s design:
In the event of failure and defects, the user should make a failure report and
should inform the manufacturer by stating the special circumstances and measures
taken. Depending on the nature of the failure, an analysis should be performed in
cooperation with the manufacturer.
The general training is intended for user’s staff who are directly involved on a
regular basis with the operation of a GIS. Depending on the prior knowledge of
the staff, parts of the following agenda may be deleted.
• Single-line diagram
• Electrical functions
Gas compartmentalization versus electrical functions
• Physical construction
• Cross-section and details of each major component type
• Substation layout drawings
Interfaces with non-GIS apparatus and civil works
• SF6 gas
• New gas physical characteristics
• Purity and moisture limits and measurements
• Gas filling procedures
• Substation gas pressure/density curves
• Pressure checking and density monitor operation
Physical characteristics, safety, and handling precautions for used or
arc-exposed gas
• Earthing system
• Review of earthing system design requirements for GIS
GIS-specific subjects related to very fast transients, enclosure touch potential
and circulating currents.
• Operating mechanisms
• Operating principles
Local, remote, and emergency operation
24 Training, Service, and Maintenance of Gas-Insulated Substations 475
• Control system
• Operation: interlocking and alarm philosophy
• Review of sample schematic drawings and panel layout
This part of the training applies only if the user’s staff is undertaking erection of a
new or an extension of an existing GIS, assuming supervision by manufacturer’s
specialists.
Operational training is based on the general training and covers normal operational
precautions. Inspection and maintenance (excluding intervention in switching com-
ponents) as well as basic activities in the case of malfunction.
Operation
Inspection/maintenance
Troubleshooting
Safety practices
Users attempting these tasks need to be aware of the relative rareness of such
events that would require detailed and up-to-date knowledge and skills.
Alternatively, utilizing the resources of the original manufacturer for these spe-
cialized functions offers the benefits of having available experienced experts whose
performance of a task will preserve the original operational reliability of GIS.