Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J Strain Analysis
1–15
Ó IMechE 2016
Experimental investigation and Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
numerical simulation of weld bead DOI: 10.1177/0309324716669612
sdj.sagepub.com
Abstract
Numerical and experimental investigations of autogenous plasma arc welding of thin titanium alloy of 2 mm thick and
modelling the temperature distribution for predicting the weld bead geometry are presented. The finite element code
COMSOL Multiphysics is employed to perform non-linear unsteady heat transfer analysis using parabolic Gaussian heat
source. Temperature-dependent material properties such as thermal conductivity, density and specific heat are used to
enhance the efficiency of simulation process. A forced convective heat transfer coefficient was used to account for the
effect of convection. The experimental trials were conducted by varying the welding speed and current using Fronius
plasma arc welding equipment. The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental results.
Keywords
Ti-6Al-4V, plasma arc welding, finite element model, parabolic Gaussian heat source, sheet metal
Component Al Fe O V Mn Nb Remaining
heat source and also a quasi-steady-state PAW heat Table 2. Plasma arc welding set-up conditions.
source. This model was used to carry out numerical
analysis of PAW of stainless steel of higher thickness. Power source Fronius magic wave 4000
Since either Gaussian or rotary Gaussian is not able to Polarity DCEN
describe the keyhole in PAW accurately, a combined Electrode 2% Thoriated tungsten electrode
heat source model was proposed by Wu et al.8 to ana- Electrode diameter 1 mm
lyse the temperature field distribution of keyhole PAW Plasma gas Argon
Plasma gas flow rate 1.5 L/min
process using finite element simulation. Short et al.9 Shielding gas Argon
investigated the effect of the current, transverse speed Shielding gas flow rate 12 L/min
and plasma gas flow rate on weld bead dimensions and Trailing shield gas flow rate 20 L/min
keyhole stability of autogenous weld of Ti-6Al-4V. Nozzle to plate distance 8 mm
Daha et al.10,11 used an adaptive heat source model to Nozzle orifice diameter 2.8 mm
Torch position Vertical
simulate the temperature field and weld bead geometry Operation type Automatic
for PAW of duplex stainless steel and dissimilar weld-
ing of duplex stainless steel and low-carbon steel alloy DCEN: direct current electrode negative.
of 6.8 mm thick. Deshpande et al.12 used three-
dimensional conical (TDC) heat source model in their electrical contact during the welding process and at the
simulation of keyhole PAW of titanium alloy of same time to arrest any movement during welding. The
2.1 mm thick. Li and Wu13 considered the arc pressure photograph of the fixture designed for titanium weld-
distribution and keyhole evolution on heat source to ing is shown in Figure 1.
develop a three-dimensional transient model for weld- Fronius magic wave 4000 PAW is used to conduct
ing stainless steel of 6 mm thick. the experiment trials. The welding polarity is an impor-
The detailed literature review reveals that modifica- tant factor in determining the melting efficiency of the
tions were suggested for existing heat source models, welding arc.15 Direct current electrode negative
and also, new heat source models were proposed for (DCEN) operating mode is selected in the PAW
numerical simulation of welding thick materials. machine which makes the electrons to flow towards the
However, for welding thin materials, especially for tita- base metal and striking the area with high speed.
nium and its alloys heat source models to depict the During PAW, material is heated to elevated tempera-
process accurately, not much work has been reported. tures, and therefore, the molten metal reacts with atmo-
In this research, parabolic Gaussian heat source spheric air resulting in deterioration of mechanical
(PGHS) model proposed by Dhinakaran et al.17 is properties of the weldment.16 To avoid reaction of mol-
applied along with a forced convective heat transfer ten metal with atmosphere, a custom-made fixture and
coefficient to account for convective heat transfer dur- trailing box are fabricated. The shielding provided by
ing PAW of thin titanium sheets in predicting tempera- the plasma arc torch along the axis of the torch is not
ture distribution pattern and weld bead geometry. sufficient to protect the molten pool from reacting with
the atmospheric air. Hence, there is a need to protect
the trailing side of the weld zone. For this purpose, the
Experimental investigations trailing box is designed to provide streamlined flow of
Experimental work is carried out for characterizing the gas to protect the trailing side of the weld zone. A num-
temperature measurement and weld bead geometry. ber of experimental trials are conducted to design the
Plates of Ti-6Al-4V material of 2 mm thick, 200 mm custom-made trailing box to obtain streamlined flow of
long and 100 mm wide are used to conduct the PAW gas to protect the back side of the weld zone. Argon
trials. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the gas of 99% purity is used as trailing and purging gas.
Ti-6Al-4V material. Titanium alloy is carefully cleaned PAW set-up conditions are given in Table 2.
as it is a prerequisite to obtain a sound weld. The sur- Welding parameters play a vital role in obtaining
face should be free from any scale, dirt and other for- good quality welds. Among the wide range of process
eign material to prevent contamination during welding. parameters, the most three influential parameters,
A stainless steel wire brush is employed to remove the namely, welding current, voltage and welding speed, are
oxide layers from the surface, and it is further wiped varied at two levels to perform bead-on-plate experi-
with acetone. The plates to be welded are clamped mental trials, and stick off distance is maintained as
using a fixture designed for this purpose which ensures constant. In addition to that, voltage also influences the
S. no. Welding current, I Voltage, V Welding speed (mm/min) Heat input per unit length (J/mm)
Figure 4. Microstructures of PAW Ti-6Al-4V: (a) base metal, (b) HAZ and (c) weld zone.
observed that the hardness value of the weld metal and mathematical equation for the heat source which
HAZ increases with a decrease in heat input. The rea- reflects the arc behaviour, and the model is called as
son for having higher hardness value with low heat heat source model. Choosing the most effective method
input is because of the structure (martensitic alpha to solve the governing equation is the second step.
prime) formed is similar to a structure quenched from Mostly, any commercially available software based on
beta phase above beta transus temperature. Therefore, finite element formulation is used to solve the govern-
the rapid cooling leads to promotion of martensite ing equation. Third step is to ensure that the results of
structure in both weld metal and HAZ compared to the simulation reflect the modelled physics. Weld bead pro-
slow cooling. file predicted from simulated temperature isotherms
(above the melting point of the base metal) is compared
with the experimentally measured weld bead geometry
Numerical modelling to check the adequacy of the simulated model.
Numerical modelling is an essential tool in the develop-
ment of welding due to the availability of high-speed
computers, accuracy and data storage.12 It also helps in
Heat source model
understanding dynamic behaviour of the welding pro- Welding is a complicated thermomechanical process in
cess. However, welding is a complicated phenomenon which metallurgical changes and heat transfer take
which involves both heat transfer and fluid flow. place. The critical part in thermomechanical modelling
Furthermore, optimizing welding parameters is one of is the development of a heat source model. The avail-
the prime motives of conducting welding trials which able heat source models such as DEHS, conical
requires time and effort. Since Ti-6Al-4V is a costly Gaussian (TDC), modified three-dimensional conical
material, conducting experimental trials is very expen- (MTDC) and quasi-steady-state PAW are used to date
sive. Hence, numerical modelling is an effective alterna- to represent the heat intensity distribution along the
tive method to reduce the number of experimental thickness of the plate for high-density welding pro-
trials and helps in obtaining optimum welding para- cesses. The heat intensity distribution along the thick-
meter with less time and effort. ness direction in available heat source models is
Any numerical modelling problem in welding decreasing either linearly or logarithmically. It is
requires three steps. First step is to formulate a observed from the experimental experience that the
3hVIe3
Q0 = ð5Þ
A v p ð e 3 1Þ
where
H5
Av = a2 z4i H + 2z2i H3 + 2z3i H2 + zi H4 +
5
3
H
+ 2ab z2i H + zi H2 + + b2 H ð6Þ
3
3hVIe3 3r2
Qv ðr, zÞ = exp ð7Þ
Av pðe3 1Þ r20
Governing equation
fusion line of the weld cross section results in a para-
Law of conservation of energy is the basic principle for
bolic shape (refer Figure 4). Dhinakaran et al.17 devel-
any fusion welding process.19 The general three-
oped a new moving volumetric heat source model with
dimensional Fourier heat conduction equation in mov-
the parabolic heat intensity variation for simulating the
ing coordinate system for a heat source moving along
PAW process on titanium alloy sheet for predicting the
the x direction given by equation (8) is used for simu-
weld bead geometry from the resulting temperature
lating the PAW process
contours. Hence, PGHS is chosen to perform the finite
element simulation of PAW process to predict the tem- dT dT
perature distribution in order to obtain macro profile rCp + rCp ðvÞ = r ðkrTÞ + Qv ðr, zÞ ð8Þ
dt dx
of the weld bead. The PGHS model is depicted in
Figure 6. where k is the thermal conductivity of material
The power density distribution at plane normal to (W/m K), r is the density of material (kg/m3), Cp is the
the z-axis is denoted by specific heat of material (J/kg K), Qv (r, z) is the inten-
sity of heat source and v is the speed with which heat
3r2 source moves on the plate (mm/s).
Qv ðr, zÞ = Q0 exp 2 ð1Þ COMSOL Multiphysics code which is based on
r0
finite element formulation is used to solve the govern-
where Q0 is the maximum heat intensity value and r0 is ing equation (8) in order to obtain temperature distri-
the distribution parameter along the radial direction. bution and weld bead geometry during PAW of Ti-
The height of the PGHS is H = ze 2 zi, where zi and ze 6Al-4V.
are the z-coordinates of the bottom and top surfaces,
respectively, and the radii at the bottom and top sur-
Initial and boundary conditions. Initial and boundary con-
faces of the heat source at z = zi and z = ze are ri and
ditions are essential to solve any transient non-linear
re, respectively. The distribution parameter in the
thermal heat conduction equation. During PAW, the
PGHS model is given by Dhinakaran et al.17
plasma arc is focused along the centre line, and heat
r0 ðzÞ = az2 + b ð2Þ energy is taken into the rest of the material through
conduction. The exchange of heat between the materials
where and the surrounding takes place due to convective and
radiative heat transfer. This leads to the cooling of weld
re ri plate. The boundary conditions are shown in Figure 7.
a= ð3Þ
z2e z2i The initial condition is specified as
ri z2e re z2i Tðx, y, z, tÞ = T0 ðx, y, zÞ ð9Þ
b= ð4Þ
z2e z2i
It is understood from the equation that the entire
where re is the top radius of the volumetric heat source; plate is maintained at ambient temperature, and the
ri is the bottom radius of the volumetric heat source; condition is only as the function of spatial coordinate.
and ze and zi are the z-coordinates of the top surface The Newton’s law of cooling and Stefan–Boltzmann
and bottom surface, respectively. law propose the equation to model the convective and
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of transverse section of plate with applied boundary condition.
radiative heat transfer. The heat losses are defined by physical properties of argon gas are listed in Table 4.
the following equation The flow from the trailing shields is considered as trian-
gular jet of arrays, and the value of heat transfer coeffi-
n ðkrTÞ = es T40 T4 + h (T0 T) ð10Þ cient is determined as 55.4 W/m2 K from the following
where e is the emissivity of the surface (0.8 for correlation20–23
Ti-6Al-4V alloy), s is Stefan–Boltzmann constant Nud = 0:067Re0:74 1=3 0:061(S=d)
ð11Þ
d Pr e
(5.67 3 1028 W/m2 K4), T0 is the ambient temperature
(303 K) and h is the convective heat transfer coefficient. where Nud is the Nusselt number, Red is the
Among the three modes of heat transfer, convection Reynolds number, Pr is the Prandtl number and s=d is
plays a major role in forming the weld pool and shape the ratio of distance between the jets to the diameter of
in PAW process. The candidate material Ti-6AL-4V the jet.
has high affinity towards atmospheric gases. Hence, a
custom-made trailing shield box is designed and devel-
oped to enclose the molten pool from atmosphere. Simulation of PAW
Figure 8 shows the custom-made trailing shield. Argon The finite element model (FEM) is formulated based on
gas with 99.9% purity is used as shielding gas, and the the following assumption:
Thermal conductivity 17.72 3 1023 W/m K Temperature Thermal Specific heat Density
Density 1.784 kg/m3 (T; K) conductivity (Cp; J/kg K) (r; kg/m3)
Specific heat 0.52 kJ/kg K (k; W/m K)
Dynamic viscosity 2.257 3 1025 N s/m2
298 7 546 4420
373 7.45 562 4406
473 8.75 584 4395
1. Plasma arc travels with constant velocity along the 573 10.15 606 4381
673 11.35 629 4366
workpiece; 773 12.6 651 4350
2. Temperature-dependent material properties of Ti- 873 14.2 673 4336
6Al-4V are considered; 973 15.5 694 4324
3. The physical phenomena such as viscous force, 1073 17.8 714 4309
buoyancy force, convective melt flow and 1173 20.2 734 4294
1273 22.7 643 4282
Marangoni effect are neglected; 1473 22.9 678 4252
4. Forced convective heat transfer coefficient is 1573 23.7 696 4240
considered; 1673 24.6 714 4225
5. Clamping force (mechanical boundary condition) 1773 25.8 732 4205
is neglected; 1873 27 750 4198
1923 28.4 759 4050
6. Thermal boundary conditions are only considered. 1973 33.4 830 3886
2100 34.6 830 3818
Simulation of PAW process is carried out using 2200 34.6 830 3750
COMSOL Multiphysics, a finite element analysis 3500 34.6 830 3750
(FEA) package, to simulate the PAW process. The
FEM is developed with the same dimensions as of the
plate used to conduct the experimental trials. The weld Table 6. Finite element mesh used for FE simulation of plasma
material Ti-6AL-4V alloy is an alpha–beta alloy in arc welding process.
which aluminium acts as alpha stabilizer, and vanadium
acts as beta stabilizer.1 The temperature-dependent 1. Prism elements 8010
2. Triangular elements 3204
material properties1,24 such as thermal conductivity,
3. Quadrilateral elements 290
density and specific heat capacity considered during 4. Edge elements 236
PAW process are presented in Table 5. 5. Vertex elements 10
The temperature field is very high in the weld metal
region and decreases along the transverse direction.
The effect of temperature gradient is accounted by
selecting more number of elements in the weld region,
about 10 mm on either side of the weld centre line with employing the PGHS model. Validation of simulation
sequence of convergence test. The number of elements result from the numerical model and applicability of
used for generating the FEM is shown in Table 6. Due newly developed volumetric heat source model are car-
to the consideration of Gaussian mode of heat distribu- ried out by comparing the macro profile resulting from
tion, the amount of heat input absorbed by the sub- simulation with the macrograph acquired from the
strate metal is higher in FZ and HAZ compared to the experimental trials as well as comparing the tempera-
base metal region. Hence, fine meshing is generated ture history obtained from the IR thermometer and
about 10 mm on either side of the weld centre line to simulation.
capture the temperature field. The suitable number of The melting temperature of the considered material
elements is selected by conducting sequence of conver- Ti-6Al-4V is 1923 K. Hence, the temperature contours
gence test. are obtained for different combinations of welding
The PGHS model is introduced in the FEM under speed and current by setting the range of temperature
heat transfer analysis to simulate the PAW of Ti-6Al- above melting point in the molten pool. Figure 9 shows
4V sheet. A non-linear transient time-dependent analy- weld bead profile predicted from finite element simula-
sis was carried out to solve the heat source equation tion and experimental work of PAW for welding cur-
and simulate the temperature distribution to predict rent of 60 A and welding speed of 275 mm/min. It
the weld bead geometry using initial condition and nat- emphasizes that the formation of melted material in the
ural boundary conditions. FZ is imperative as the surface temperature of the heat
source rises beyond 1923 K. The surface area that
attains a temperature of above 1923 K gets melted lead-
Results and discussions
ing to the formation of molten pool. The dotted line is
Temperature distribution of PAW of Ti-6Al-4V sheet is drawn on the fusion line boundary of each experimen-
computed through finite element simulation by tal weld bead profiles obtained for different
Figure 10. Comparison of simulated weld bead profile with experimental outcomes.
Figure 16 shows the temperature distribution along create thermal gradient to melt the material, and no
the transverse direction of the welded plate under the keyhole formation was observed since the peak tem-
parameters welding current of 60 A and speed of perature is below the boiling point of material. Hence,
300 mm/min. The peak temperature is 3186 K. It is partial penetration (1.2 mm) is observed from
observed that the heat energy supplied is insufficient to Figure 16.
Conclusion
PAW of Ti-6Al-4V sheet of 2 mm thick is reported in
this research work. Experimental trials are conducted
to obtain the macro profile of the weld bead and mea-
sure the temperature history using IR thermometer.
Numerical simulations are carried out to predict the
weld bead profile and temperature history during weld-
Figure 11. Comparison of experimental temperature history ing. Based on the investigations, the following conclu-
with simulation at three different points A, B and C on the sions are made:
surface.
1. The three-dimensional FEM can predict the weld
bead profile of both full penetration and partial
Figure 17 shows the temperature filed distribution penetration of PAW of titanium thin sheets;
along the longitudinal direction of the plate with para- 2. It is found that the temperature gradient becomes
meters 60 A welding current and 250 mm/min speed. insufficient during welding with low heat input
The peak temperature rises to 3739 K from 3186 K which plays a major role in creating and stabilizing
because more amount of heat energy is supplied when the keyhole;
plasma arc travels with a speed of 250 mm/min. It is 3. A stable keyhole condition and full depth of pene-
also observed that thermal gradient is high enough to tration are achieved for parameters 60 A welding
Figure 12. Temperature distribution on the surface for the heat input of 248 J/mm.
Figure 13. Temperature distribution on the surface for the heat input of 272 J/mm.
Figure 14. Temperature distribution on the surface for the heat input of 298 J/mm.
Figure 15. Temperature distribution on the surface for the current of 60 A and welding speed of 250 mm/min at different time
steps.
Figure 16. Temperature distribution along the thickness of the plate for parameters 60 A and 300 mm/min.
current and 250 mm/min speed with 8 mm stick off 5. Based on the analysis results, it is inferred that
distance for a 2-mm-thick Ti-6Al-4V weld; the weld bead profile predicted from the simulated
4. The micro hardness values are observed to be temperature field through finite element simulation
higher than both HAZ and base metal. The reason using the PGHS model shows good agreement
for higher value in weld metal is because of the with the experimentally measured weld bead
martensite structural formation; geometry;
Figure 17. Temperature distribution along the thickness of the plate for parameters 60 A and 250 mm/min.
6. Furthermore, comparison between measured and and quality in stainless steel edge joint welds. Sci Technol
predicted temperatures at distances of 7, 14 and Weld Joi 2003; 8(6): 423–430.
21 mm from the weld trajectory on the surface of 7. Wu CS, Wang HG and Zhang YM. A new heat source
the substrate material shows good agreement. The model for keyhole plasma arc welding in FEM analysis
difference between the measured and predicted is of the temperature profile. Weld J 2006; 85: 284s–291s.
8. Wu CS, Hu QX and Gao JQ. An adaptive heat source
below 5%, thus indicating that the developed
model for finite-element analysis of keyhole plasma arc
model can reasonably be applied for predicting the
welding. Comp Mater Sci 2009; 46(1): 167–172.
shape and size of the plasma arc weld. 9. Short A, McCartney DG, Webb P, et al. Parametric
envelopes for keyhole plasma arc welding of a titanium
alloys. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference
Declaration of conflicting interests
trends in welding research, Pine Mountain, GA, 1–6 June
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest 2008, pp.690–696. Materials Park, OH: ASM
with respect to the research, authorship and/or publica- International.
tion of this article. 10. Daha MA, Nassef GA, Abdullah IA, et al. Three-dimen-
sional thermal finite element modeling for keyhole plasma
arc welding of 2205 duplex stainless steel plates. Int J Eng
Funding Tech 2012; 2(4): 720–728.
The author(s) received no financial support for the 11. Daha MA, Nassef GA and Abdullah IA. Numerical
research, authorship and/or publication of this article. modeling of heat transfer and fluid flow in keyhole
plasma arc welding of dissimilar steel joints. Int J Eng
Tech 2012; 4(2): 506–512.
References 12. Deshpande AA, Short A, Sun W, et al. Finite-element
analysis of experimentally identified parametric envelopes
1. Boyer R, Welsch G and Coolings EW. Material proper- for stable keyhole plasma arc welding of a titanium alloy.
ties handbook: titanium alloys. Materials Park, OH: ASM J Strain Anal Eng 2012; 47(5): 266–275.
International, 2007. 13. Li TQ and Wu CS. Numerical simulation of plasma arc
2. Donachie MJ. Titanium: a technical guide. 2nd ed. Mate- welding with keyhole-dependent heat source and arc
rials Park, OH: ASM International, 2000. pressure distribution. Int J Adv Mater Technol 2015; 78:
3. Leyens C and Peters M. Titanium and titanium alloys: 593–602.
fundamentals and applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH 14. Stenbacka N. On arc efficiency in gas tungsten arc weld-
Verlag GmbH & Co, 2003. ing. Soldagem Insp 2013; 18(4): 380–390.
4. Langford G. Plasma arc welding for large titanium aero- 15. Otani T. Titanium welding technology. Shinnittetsu Giho
space structures. SAE technical paper 660646, 1966. 2006; 385: 88–92.
5. Martikainen JK and Moisio TJI. Investigation of the 16. Recipe for welding simulations in present research, http://
effect of welding parameters on weld quality of plasma prr.hec.gov.pk/chapters/254S-3.pdf
arc keyhole welding of structural steels. Weld Res Suppl 17. Dhinakaran V, Siva Shanmugam N and Sankaranaraya-
1993; 2(7): 329s–340s. nasamy K. Some studies on temperature field during
6. Tseng KH, Hsieh ST and Tseng CC. Effect of process plasma arc welding of thin titanium alloy sheets using
parameters of micro-plasma arc welding on morphology parabolic Gaussian heat source model. Proc IMechE,
Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science. Epub ahead of 22. James W, Gauntner Herbert J, Gladden Daniel J, et al.
print 21 December 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0954406215 Cross flow effects on impingement cooling of a turbine
623574. vane. NASA technical memorandum, NASA TM X-
18. Li Y, Feng YH, Zhang XX, et al. An improved simula- 3029, March 1974, pp.1–19. Washington, DC: NASA.
tion of heat transfer and fluid flow in plasma arc welding 23. Hrycak P. Heat transfer from impinging jets a literature
with modified heat source model. Int J Therm Sci 2013; review. Final report for period: September 1979–Novem-
64: 93–104. ber 1980. Flight Dynamics Laboratory, http://www.dtic.
19. Metcalfe JC and Quigley BC. Heat transfer in plasma-arc mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a106723.pdf
welding. Weld J 1975; 54(3): 99s–103s. 24. Jamshidinia M, Kong F and Kovacevic R. Numerical
20. Ott HH. Heat transfer to a plate cooled by air. Schweiz modeling of heat distribution in the electron beam weld-
Bauztg 1961; 79: 834–840. ing of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci E: T ASME 2013; 135:
21. Living Hood JNB and Hrycak P. Impingement heat trans- 061010-1–061010-14.
fer from turbulent air jets to flat plates – a literature survey. 25. Zhang T, Wu CS and Feng Y. Numerical analysis of heat
NASA technical memorandum, NASA TM X-2788, May transfer and fluid flow in keyhole plasma arc welding.
1973, pp.1–42. Washington, DC: NASA. Numer Heat Tr A: Appl 2011; 60(8): 685–698.