You are on page 1of 3

The n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l of m e dic i n e

C or r e sp ondence

Ivabradine in Catecholamine-Induced Tachycardia in a Patient


with Paraganglioma
To the Editor: A paraganglioma-related clinical tion, 60%) and functional status (New York Heart
sequela results from catecholamine secretion that Association class I) were excellent.
can cause hypertension, tachyarrhythmia, multi­
organ failure, and death.1 Radiolabeled lutetium- Figure 1 (facing page). Sites of Action for Heart-Rate
177 (177Lu)–Dotatate (Lutathera) is a systemic Control in Catecholamine-Induced Tachycardia.
therapy administered as a 30-to-60-minute intra- As shown in Panel A, heart rate is controlled by the
venous infusion at a dose of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) ­autonomic nervous system, and the sinoatrial (SA)
every 8 weeks for four cycles. After binding as a node acts as the pacemaker. Sinus tachycardia that re-
sults from elevated levels of catecholamines released
somatostatin analogue to overexpressed soma-
from paragangliomas is one of the most prevalent cardio-
tostatin receptors on a tumor, 177Lu-Dotatate vascular manifestations of these tumors. Norepineph-
undergoes radioactive decay, releasing beta par- rine, epinephrine, or both are released from sympathetic
ticles that subsequently lead to cellular disrup- nerve terminals, the adrenal medulla, or catecholamine-
tion; this disruption causes profound catechola­ secreting tumors and bind to β1-adrenoceptors, β2 -
adrenoceptors, or both in the heart. A subsequent
mine release.2 A pharmacologic catecholamine
­cascade results, wherein a β-adrenoceptor coupled
blockade is achieved with α-adrenoceptor and with Gs-protein activates adenylate cyclase, which in-
β-adrenoceptor blockers, calcium-channel block- creases cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels and promotes ion-
ers, or both, with or without a catecholamine channel permeability, thereby increasing node activity,
synthesis inhibitor, metyrosine (Demser).1 Studies automaticity, and conduction velocity and leading to
sinus tachycardia. AV denotes atrioventricular, DOPA
of other medications for catecholamine-induced
3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, and HCN hyperpolarization-
sinus tachycardia are limited. activated, cyclic nucleotide–gated. As shown in Panel B,
Here, we report the case of a 54-year-old man traditional treatment options for sinus tachycardia in-
with an inoperable metastatic paraganglioma in clude β-adrenoceptor and calcium-channel blockers,
whom systemic targeted radiotherapy with 177Lu- which provide negative chronotropic effects on the SA
node, depression of the AV node, and decreased con-
Dotatate was indicated. He had hypertension
duction velocity and contractility in cardiomyocytes. In
and tachycardia that were well controlled with addition, metyrosine (Demser), an inhibitor of the rate-
the use of phenoxybenzamine, metoprolol, and limiting enzyme in catecholamine biosynthesis, tyrosine
metyrosine, and his cardiac status (ejection frac- hydroxylase, decreases catecholamine synthesis and
therefore decreases catecholamine-induced stimulation
this week’s letters of the heart. As shown in Panel C, a new drug, ivabra­
dine, works by targeting the If current in the SA node
1284 Ivabradine in Catecholamine-Induced Tachycardia through intracellular blockade of the HCN channel,
leading to reduced diastolic depolarization of the pace-
in a Patient with Paraganglioma
maker action potential and thus decreasing the heart
1286 Retraction: Steering CAR T Cells into Solid rate. In this manner, despite β-adrenoceptor activation
and cAMP production, an electrical impulse would not
Tumors. N Engl J Med 2019;380:289-91. be generated because of If current blockade. Ivabradine
acts solely on the SA node; therefore, catecholamine
1287 Fracture Prevention with Zoledronate in Older effects on the AV node and cardiomyocytes would not
Women with Osteopenia be mitigated by this drug. Nevertheless, the regulation
of the intrinsic pacemaker in the SA node is paramount
1289 Immune Escape of AML Cells after Transplantation in heart-rate control.

1284 n engl j med 380;13 nejm.org  March 28, 2019

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org at IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY on March 27, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Correspondence

A Catecholamine Influence on Cardiac Conduction System

SA Node S Y MP A T H E T IC N E R V E T E R MIN A L

Tyrosine DOPA Dopamine


hydroxylase decarboxylase -hydroxylase
β-hydroxylase
Sympathetic
nerves
Tyrosine DOPA Dopamine Norepinephrine

Ca2+ Ca2+ Na+ HCN Adenylate


channel channel cyclase

Increased Gs protein β-adrenoceptor


cAMP
Protein kinase A

AV Node and Cardiomyocyte


Increased SA node activity

Norepinephrine

Increased AV node
Adenylate Ca2+
Ca2+ automaticity and Sinus Tachycardia
cyclase channel conduction velocity

Increased myocyte
β-adrenoceptor contractility, automaticity,
Increased Protein and conduction velocity
Gs protein cAMP kinase A

B Traditional Treatment Options (Metyrosine, β-adrenoceptor blocker, Ca-channel blocker)


Decreased Decreased sympathetic
Tyrosine DOPA Dopamine
norepinephrine response from each
point of the cardiac
Metyrosine Tyrosine DOPA Dopamine
conduction system
hydroxylase decarboxylase β-hydroxylase

Ca2+
Ca channel β-adrenoceptor
blocker blocker

Decreased
cAMP

C New Treatment Option (Ivabradine)


Direct SA node inhibition
Tyrosine DOPA Dopamine Norepinephrine

Tyrosine DOPA Dopamine


hydroxylase decarboxylase β-hydroxylase
Decreased impulse
conducted throughout
Na + the electrical system
HCN
of the heart, thereby
channel
achieving heart-rate
control
SA N O D E
Increased
Ivabradine cAMP

n engl j med 380;13 nejm.org March 28, 2019 1285


The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org at IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY on March 27, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l of m e dic i n e

Before the initiation of treatment with 177Lu- Catecholamines increase heart rate through
Dotatate, his plasma norepinephrine level was β-adrenoceptor stimulation (Fig. 1). β-adreno­
20,500 pg per milliliter (normal range, 84 to ceptor and calcium-channel blockers modulate
794; 121 nmol per liter [normal range, 0.5 to 4.7]), this effect by inhibiting the signal cascade. Al-
and his plasma epinephrine level was less than though β-adrenoceptor desensitization occurs with
20 pg per milliliter (normal range, 0 to 57; prolonged catecholamine stimulation,4 tachycardia
<109 pmol per liter [normal range, 0 to 311.2]). persists despite maximal β-adrenoceptor blockade.
After one cycle of 177Lu-Dotatate, he had hyper- Ivabradine is a commercially available If cur-
tension and tachycardia, and he received occa- rent inhibitor that acts directly in the sinus node
sional 5-mg phentolamine intravenous pushes, without adverse cardiovascular events.5 The If
esmolol at a dose of 200 μg per kilogram of body current acts in the hyperpolarization-activated,
weight per minute, labetalol at a dose of 2 mg cyclic nucleotide–gated (HCN) channel of the
per minute, and diltiazem at a dose of 15 mg per sinoatrial node; this current increases with sym-
hour to establish circulatory control. Despite pathetic stimulation, resulting in the generation
adequate medical management, the tachycardia and modulation of cardiac rhythmicity.5 Thus,
and hypertension became resistant to treatment. regulated impulse generation with ivabradine is
As predicted, the norepinephrine level increased, one possible approach in managing sinus tachy-
reaching 172,000 pg per milliliter (1020 nmol cardia in patients who have persistently elevated
per liter). Subsequently, systolic heart failure catecholamine levels and β-adrenoceptor desen-
(ejection fraction, 30%) and acute kidney injury sitization and therefore diminished responses to
developed. Persistent tachycardia despite max­ β-adrenoceptor blockers.
imum doses of β-adrenoceptor and calcium- Gelinemae Malaza, M.D.
channel blockers, as well as metyrosine, war- Alessandra Brofferio, M.D.
ranted immediate consideration of additional Frank Lin, M.D.
rate-control medications. Karel Pacak, M.D., Ph.D.
Ivabradine (Corlanor), which has an excellent National Institutes of Health
safety profile and benefit in patients with heart Bethesda, MD
karel@​­mail​.­nih​.­gov
failure,3 was administered orally at a dose of 5 mg Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with
twice daily. Heart-rate control was achieved with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.
a decrease in the maximal pulse from 143 beats 1. Pacak K. Preoperative management of the pheochromocy-
per minute on the day before administration of toma patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;​92:​4069-79.
2. Makis W, McCann K, McEwan AJ. The challenges of treating
ivabradine to 92 beats per minute on the third
paraganglioma patients with (177)Lu-DOTATATE PRRT: catechol-
day of ivabradine use. When the dose of ivabra­ amine crises, tumor lysis syndrome and the need for modification
dine was tapered to 2.5 mg twice a day, tachy- of treatment protocols. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;​49:​223-30.
3. Koruth JS, Lala A, Pinney S, Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR. The
cardia developed, and the patient was therefore
clinical use of ivabradine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;​70:​1777-84.
sent home with instructions to take the drug at 4. Tsujimoto G, Manger WM, Hoffman BB. Desensitization of
a dose of 5 mg twice a day. His cardiac function beta-adrenergic receptors by pheochromocytoma. Endocrinology
1984;​114:​1272-8.
improved, and the ejection fraction increased to
5. DiFrancesco D. The role of the funny current in pacemaker
45%. Because of the patient’s clinical course, activity. Circ Res 2010;​106:​434-46.
subsequent 177Lu-Dotatate cycles were deferred. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1817267

Retraction: Steering CAR T Cells into Solid Tumors.


N Engl J Med 2019;380:289-91.
To the Editor: Because the authors of the Marion H. Brown, Ph.D.
­Nature article entitled “A Homing System Tar- Michael L. Dustin, Ph.D.
University of Oxford
gets Therapeutic T Cells to Brain Cancer”1 have Oxford, United Kingdom
retracted it owing to issues with figure pre­ This letter was published on February 20, 2019, at NEJM.org.
sentation and underlying data, we hereby 1. Samaha H, Pignata A, Fousek K, et al. A homing system tar-
wish to retract our commentary on that arti- gets therapeutic T cells to brain cancer. Nature 2018;​561:​331-7.
2. Brown MH, Dustin ML. Steering CAR T cells into solid tumors.
cle, entitled “Steering CAR T Cells into Solid N Engl J Med 2019;​380:​289-91.
Tumors.” 2
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1902526

1286 n engl j med 380;13 nejm.org  March 28, 2019

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org at IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY on March 27, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

You might also like