Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted to:
Submitted by:
Jeevan Regmi
Section: "A"
SUMMARY 4
1. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY: 4
2. SPECIAL FACILITIES FOR TARGET GROUPS: 4
3. DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL AND COMPETITIVE FARMING SYSTEM: 5
4. CONSERVATION, PROMOTION AND UTILIZATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT: 5
5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ARRANGEMENT: 5
ANALYSIS 5
PROS OF NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL POLICY 2004 5
1. INCREASE IN PRODUCTION LEVEL DUE TO PROPER UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES: 5
2. INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME: 7
CONS OF NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL POLICY 2004 7
1. FINANCING: 7
2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: 8
3. BUDGET DEFICIT: 8
SOLUTIONS 10
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: 11
REFERENCES: 11
HONOR CODE 11
INTRODUCTION
The agricultural sector is the highest employer in Nepal at 66% of the population. Nepal
Agriculture is in a low development stage. The majority of the population engaged in agriculture
are basically traditional ways of farming which is less commercial based and more for self
consuming purposes. Productivity and competitiveness of the sector are low, adoption of
improved technology is limited. And even though most cultivated area is devoted to cereals,
there is no proper supply chain management where raw materials are processed further into
finished products. There is a growing food trade deficit and malnutrition is high. Some
subsectors such as dairy processing, poultry, tea, vegetable seed and fisheries show dynamism,
but overall, these positive signs are not yet sufficient to lift a large number of people engaged in
agriculture out of poverty. When the long-term agricultural strategic plan known as the
Agriculture Perspective Plan (APP) was launched in 1995-96, Nepal agricultural sector was in a
worse situation. After AAP was launched, improvement in living standards has occurred and that
the agricultural sector overall was performing better than in the past.
SUMMARY
The National Agricultural Policy 2004 (NAP-2004) is a policy in the agricultural sector which
guides all the commodity and subject specific policies formulated in this particular sector. The
major vision of this policy is to increase the living standard of people from the shift of
subsistence oriented system to competitive commercial farming system. The policy ensures the
objectives to increase in agricultural production and productivity. These objectives would be
fulfilled by the implementation of policies formulated in the year 2004. The policies under the
National Agricultural policy are categorized as:
1. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY : The policy aims to develop and expand
irrigation facilities, agricultural roads, rural electrification and other appropriate agricultural technologies.
Further, the use of information technology and means of mass communication is emphasized in the
agricultural extension activities. Agricultural and forestry Universities are also proposed to be established
in order to produce skilled agricultural human resource
2. SPECIAL FACILITIES FOR TARGET GROUPS: Government is willing to bring all the marginalized
groups of farmers into the mainstream of agricultural development. The government has put special
emphasis to provide better facilities to the Dalit and Utpidit classes as well to women farmers
ANALYSIS
In the above figure if the policies work accordingly to utilize our human, natural, physical and financial resources
properly, we could reach near our production possibility. We could move from point ‘A’ to point ‘B’ towards
optimum capacity as shown in the above figure.
S HIFT IN PPC : Proper implementation of this policy is expected to shift the PPC outwards also. The
PPC shifts outwards due to the mobilization of new technologies and technical services that
improves the production process and helps to boost the economy efficiently. As we read the policies,
we can notice a high degree of emphasis put on the development of infrastructures and technology. Such
improvement in technology helps us to increase our production capabilities thus shifting the Production Possibility
Curve (PPC) to the right. This condition is presented below:
In the above figure there is increase in production capabilities, i.e shift of PPC1 TO PPC2. The shift is due to
technological advancements in agriculture sector so we can notice the shift is towards agricultural goods.
2. INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME: If the policies are carried out effectively, the national income will
increase as it would hit all determinants (consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports)
of the aggregate expenditure curve. With the increase in level of income of the rural farmers the
consumption in the nation will increase, the investment will increase and more investors and foreign direct
investment come. Also the government spending in developing the rural areas will increase and finally due
to the increased productivity the exports will also increase. In summary, the entire AE curve will shift to the
right and as a result increasing the national income. This is shown in the figure below:
In the above figure all the components of AD curve (consumption, investment,
government spending, and net exports) rise because of the above mentioned reasons.
2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK :
Nepal lacks regulatory framework for infrastructure. Several projects overrun cost and time because
of the state or central government policies like land acquisition, environment clearances, finance
approvals etc.
3. BUDGET DEFICIT: The policies in the National Agricultural Policy, 2004 require a high level of
spending for it to be successful. The policies talk about developing and expanding irrigation facilities,
agricultural roads, rural electrification and appropriate agricultural technologies. In areas with
irrigation, road and electricity facilities, arrangement shall be made to ensure both intensive and
extensive use of the available technologies. Also, the policy plans to carry on large projects covering
more than one district, to promote potential agricultural production and enterprises and create the
basis of commercialization. In other words, these projects are not possible unless the government
allocates a high amount of its budget. For a country like Nepal, who is already operating on a high
budget deficit, it will further increase the deficit and create pressure in the country.
1. INEFFECTIVENESS REGARDING GOOD GOVERNANCE : The part about good governance in the
document does not show commitment in implementation of National Agricultural Policy 2004. If that were the
case, we don’t have to see rich people taking subsidy allocated for poor farmers. Sound planning of
implementation will not be possible just by talking about the theoretical aspect of good governance. Good
governance is just limited to suggestions rather than identifying what should be done. In the place of good
governance we can see present agricultural bureaucracy engulfed within nepotism and obeying orders from
higher officials.
The description of good governance should be presented as a strategic work plan. Restructuring
bureaucracy, review of the procurement law of the government and efficiency in the flow of
service and technology should be taken as important constituents of good governance while
talking about agricultural sector.
2. INEFFECTIVENESS REGARDING INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY : Productivity will increase in case of
timely availability of quality inputs. The policy recognizes that the long term productivity and competitiveness
of the agricultural sector depends on the access and adoption to improved technology as well as effective
management of natural resources and other inputs to achieve increase of total factor productivity.
Nepali agriculture is still weaker as small farmers can’t invest and take risks against the possible
losses in farming on their own. Primarily, because of this farmers are moving away from
agriculture. Further, it should not be forgotten that APP has failed mainly because donors
encouraged developing the project with high investment and eventually they backed off
themselves.
SOLUTIONS
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: Organizations should make up some effective plans, implement them,
test the performance and measure its results to achieve their targeted goals. Implementation and the proper
supervision, regulation and control of activities is something which we should focus more for the accomplishment
of goals in an organization.
REFERENCES:
National Agricultural Policy (2004)
HONOR CODE
On my honor as a student, I pledge that I have neither given nor received aid in this assignment.
Jeevan Regmi
18781