Report On The Implementation of The Enms According To Iso 50001

Report on the implementation of
the EnMS according to ISO 50001

February 2017
Twitter: @500001SEAPs
www.500001seaps.eu
Deliverable No. D5.2
Work Package 5
Dissemination Level RE
Author(s) EKODOMA
Co-author(s) All partners
Date February 2017
File Name D5.2_monitoring_EMS_50000&1.docx
This document (report, etc.) has been prepared in the framework of the European project
50000&1 SEAPs – Energy Management for Sustainable Action Plans (Grant agreement no.
IEE/XXXX) co-financed by the European Commission in the “Intelligent Energy – Europe”
(IEE) Programme.
CONTACT:
Email: 500001seaps@iclei.org
Website: www.500001seaps.eu
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the
authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European
Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are
responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained
therein.
Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 2

www.500001seaps.eu
Executive summary
Even though the ISO 50001 initially was designed for industries, throughout the process of
energy planning in municipalities the need for systematic approach to reduce energy
consumption and CO2 emissions raised also in local authorities. The objective of the
50000&1SEAPs project was to integrate Sustainable energy action plans (SEAPs) in more
than 40 municipalities with energy management system (ISO 50001).
This report summarises the results of checking and monitoring the implementation of the
energy management system (EnMS) in the eight partner countries. According to the
requirements of ISO 50001, in the check phase municipality shall:
 plan and carry out proper monitoring and measurement;

 periodically evaluate compliance;
 manage non conformities, corrective measures and preventive measures;
 control records;
 plan and carry out internal audit of the EnMS;
 review the EnMS.
As experience from 50000&1SEAPs show, in different countries and even in different

municipalities in the same country, there will be different motivators. Among main motivators
and reasons why more than 40 local authorities developed, implemented and also certified
their energy management systems and integrated them in their SEAPs are: regulatory
framework, possibility to reduce costs, chance to supervise and require contracted services,
possibility for systematic approach, data availability and personal interest.
In the meantime, there are still different barriers and challenges to overcome.
50000&1SEAPs consortium identified three kinds of barriers: first and most important –
human, then financial (though signalled by minor number of municipalities) and the third –
technical.
The first chapter of the report summarises in detail results and experience in implementation
of the EnMS from more than 40 municipalities in eight different EU countries. The second
chapter is dedicated to different best practice EnMS case studies in the eight countries.

www.500001seaps.eu
Table of Content
Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 3
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5
1 Development and implementation of EnMS in municipalities. Results ............................ 6
1.1 Summary on energy management systems in partner countries ............................. 6
1.2 Main motivators ....................................................................................................... 7
1.3 Barriers and challenges........................................................................................... 8
1.4 Energy data monitoring ........................................................................................... 9
1.5 Energy targets of the EnMS .................................................................................. 10
1.6 Results from internal / certification audits .............................................................. 11
1.7 General observations and lessons learned............................................................ 14
2 Best case studies ......................................................................................................... 17
2.1 Use of an online energy monitoring platform (Latvia)............................................. 17
2.2 Increasing awareness of people by visual effect (Romania) .................................. 18
2.3 Energy Efficiency measures in Public Buildings (Italy) ........................................... 19
2.4 Optimising EnMS on public assets (France) .......................................................... 20
2.5 Municipal Fleet Renewal X (Spain)........................................................................ 21
2.6 Installation of metering systems in public buildings and schools (Greece) ............. 22
2.7 Monitoring of electricity, natural gas and water consumption (Poland) .................. 23
2.8 Installation of solar PVs (Bulgaria)......................................................................... 24
Executive summaries in national languages ........................................................................ 25

www.500001seaps.eu
Introduction
The introduction to ISO 50001 states that it “enables that organization to take a systematic
approach, in order to achieve continual improvement of energy performance, energy
efficiency and energy conservation”. The aim of ISO 50001 Standard is to support energy
reviews and to address measurable improvements of energy performances. The basic four
steps of PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle in relation to the ISO 50001 standard are shown in
the Figure 1.
Continual
Continual
improvement
improvement
Energy policy
Planning
Management review
Implementation and
operation
Checking
Internal audit Monitoring and

measurement
Corrective and
preventive action
Figure 1: The approach of ISO 50001
Even though the ISO 50001 initially was designed for industries, throughout the process of
energy planning in municipalities the need for systematic approach to reduce energy
consumption and CO2 emissions raised also in local authorities. The objective of the
50000&1SEAPs project was to integrate Sustainable energy action plans (SEAPs) in more
than 40 municipalities with energy management system (ISO 50001).
This report summarises the results of checking and monitoring the implementation of the
energy management system (EnMS) in the eight partner countries. According to the
requirements of ISO 50001, in this phase municipality shall:
 plan and carry out proper monitoring and measurement;

 periodically evaluate compliance;

www.500001seaps.eu
 manage non conformities, corrective measures and preventive measures;

 control records;
 plan and carry out internal audit of the EnMS;
 review the EnMS.
1 Development and implementation of

EnMS in municipalities. Results
1.1 Summary on energy management systems in partner countries
In total 34 municipalities, 1 conurbation with 17 cities, 1 joint city-conurbation with 22 cities

and federation of 11 municipalities successfully developed energy management system in
their municipalities. In the Table 1 are summarised results about the selected EnMS
boundaries and documentation, i.e. whether municipalities had manuals with procedures,
only procedures or only manual. In general municipality can select at least four different
sectors in their EnMS: public buildings, public lighting, public transport and/or public fleet.
Table 1: Summary on created energy management systems in eight EU countries
Number of LAs Level of success

Country EnMS boundaries Documentation
developing EnMS achieved
5 (Bratsigovo, In 4 municipalities for selected public
Manual together
Bulgaria Chepelare, Nedelino, Successful buildings. In 1 municipality – selected
with procedures
Rudozem, Zlatograd) public buildings and street lighting
1 city, 1 conurbation
with 17 cities + 1 joint The most significant energy consumers -
France Successful Only Manual
city-conurbation with 10 to 20 buildings of various sorts
22 cities
6 Municipalities
(Metamorfosi, All municipal consumptions (buildings,
Philothei-Psychiko, cars, public lighting, facilities) in 5 Manual together
Greece Partly successful
Papagou-Cholargou, municipalities and in 1 municipality with procedures
Alimos, Lavreotiki, municipal fleet
Irakleio)
For 3 municipalities and also Federation
of municipalities - public buildings and
3 Municipalities + 1 public lighting system, however in case
Italy Federation of 11 Successful of the Federation the certification Procedures only
Municipalities concerns the support in monitoring and
improving energy performance of the 11
Municipalities
5 (Ādaži, Daugavpils, In 4 municipalities: all public buildings
th Manual together
Latvia Cēsis, Smiltene, Successful and public lighting; in the 5 - also public
with procedures
Sigulda) transport
6 municiplities The process turned
For selected public buildings; in two
Poland (Grybów, Pilzno, out to be more time
municipalities also public street lighting
Słupsk, Sztum, consuming than

www.500001seaps.eu
Zarszyn, Żyraków) initially planned

Different results
6 (Lugoj, Resita, Ineu,
were achieved: in
Sannicolau Mare, Manual together
Romania some municipalities Main public building in each municipality
Faget and Otelu with procedures
very successful, in
Rosu)
some less
2 (Carballiño, Xinzo Urban waste management (including
Spain Successful Procedures only
de Limia) public waster infrastructure)
Integrating EEA and EnMS: experience from France

The European Energy Award (EEA) supports some 1400 municipalities willing to contribute to sustainable
energy policy and urban development through the rational use of energy and increased use of renewable
energies. EEA is a tool for energy policy quality management for municipalities and local authorities (LAs)
taking all energy related policies into account on the given territory. EEA addresses the entire territory and
is therefore overlapping SEAP / SECAP scope. France is one of the Ordinary members of the EEA.
The constitution of an EnMS system worked seamlessly for French LAs because the ones associated to
the project had a certain maturity in energy management and the will to take it to a higher level. This was
concertized in the constitution of EnMS manuals in all LAs which allowed LAs to institutionalise their
actions rigorously within the ISO 50001 framework.
The EnMS was built upon LAs' organisations and procedures and in some cases, upon the ones of the
facility management subcontractors' procedures. It covers generally the way LAs manage energy with
particular focus on significant buildings and facilities. LAs assets may count numerous and different types
of facilities, e.g. schools, administrations, association buildings, sports complexes, swimming pools, etc.
Therefore it is not a multi-venue procedure where same procedures apply on all buildings.
The choice of the most significant energy consumptions in France was driven by following principles:
 Largest energy consumers (the EnMS covers from 50% to 80% of LAs energy consumption when
integrating the top 10 or top 20 facilities).
 Facilities significant of their type (e.g. one large school) offering a potential of enlarging the EnMS
scope progressively to similar buildings.
 Significant consumptions besides buildings, such as LAs fleet fuel consumption and public
lighting.
1.2 Main motivators
In different countries and even in different municipalities in the same country, there will be
different motivators. Below are summarised the main motivators and reasons why local
authorities developed, implemented and also certified their energy management systems and
integrated them in their SEAPs.

www.500001seaps.eu
Legislation: Provisions in the national legislation, e.g. towards

EnMS in local authorities or use of white certificates
Knowledge and assistance: Technical assistance from project

partners to create EnMS in LAs
Cost reduction: Recognition of the effort for minimization of

energy consumption and related cost
Supervision: Control over different contractors
Systematic approach: for evaluation of projects, tenders and

procurements
Persons: member of the City Council, member of the technical

department of the LA, energy manager
Data availability: Possibility to have qualitative data
Figure 2: Main groups of motivators of implementation of EnMS in municipalities
1.3 Barriers and challenges
Only few involved parties, including municipalities initially had a clear perception of energy
management system and integration of it in the local SEAPs. Therefore one of the initial
challenges for part of technical partners of 50000&1SEAPs project was to overcome it and
gather the general knowledge on the concept.
It was clear that there will be different barriers and challenges during the process of creation
and implementation of EnMS in local municipalities. Some of them were already well known
before like energy data gathering, assigning responsibilities. Also in this case, one of the
main barriers and challenges were of human nature.
The other group of barriers are still financial (though
signalled by minor number of municipalities) and the
third – technical.
In general throughout the whole process all these

barriers most of municipalities managed to
overcome. The most significant challenges at
different stages of the process were:
 Human:
o Lack of municipal energy managers at
the beginning of the process;

www.500001seaps.eu
o Identification of the “right” energy manager throughout the process;

o Significant amount of other duties of the personnel involved in the EnMS
development process, which made it hard for them to focus on the task;
o Lack of competences as well as old mentality; need for significant training of
the personnel;
o Political restless, bureaucracy in LAs as well as lower priority than other
activities in LA;
o Cooperation and coordination among departments;
o Certification bodies have a hard time understanding it is no multi-site
procedure (see more in the box below);
o During implementation additional limitation came from the cross departmental
communication barrier and avoidance of leadership/responsibility assumptions
of some key responsible people.
 Financial:
o Lack of own financial opportunities to implement and maintain the EnMS
o Lack of funds for the EnMS certification and renewing the certificate in the
future.
 Technical:
o Scarce availability of initial energy consumption data, methodological
approach in data collection and data management at the initial part of the
process;
o Definition of the significant energy uses, definition of the energy measures
priority.
The ISO 50001 certification raised several issues:

 The certification bodies and advisors are familiar with industrial facilities and with multi-site (e.g.
supermarket chains) certifications but had a hard time in understanding of the scope and procedures in
the municipalities. In some countries this led to high certification costs because the certification bodies
insisted to inspect all facilities, which could not be accepted.
 Some municipalities applied for an alternative financing scheme for its certification, e.g. Lorient (France)
used an initiative called Pro SMEn (supported by ATEE – energy association) based on white certificates
(Utilities subsidise by reducing energy bills in exchange for white certificates).
 The certification bodies were inconsistent as to scope & cost of the certification (including on proposals
from one certification body). In some countries, e.g. France, Latvia standardisation organisations act as
certificatory bodies and a consultant on ISO, hence causing a certain amount of confusion.
1.4 Energy data monitoring
According to the ISO 50001 standard, municipalities have to ensure monitoring,

measurement and analysis of the energy performance of their selected EnMS boundaries at
certain intervals. It means that municipalities have to identify significant energy uses,
variables, and energy performance indicators as well as assess effectiveness of the selected
actions.

www.500001seaps.eu
An important aspect during establishment of the EnMS is to ensure appropriate frequency of

energy consumption data monitoring in order to take action and assess the result of it. Figure
3 summarises current practices regarding data collection availability and frequency. In more
than half of the countries, energy consumption data in municipalities are collected on
quarterly basis. In France, Latvia and Poland energy data are gathered on monthly basis.
Latvia:
monthly
Poland:
monthly
France:
monthly
Romania:
quaterly Bulgaria:
quaterly
Italy:
quaterly
Greece:
Spain: quaterly
quaterly
Figure 3: Energy consumption data collection practice in eight partner countries
1.5 Energy targets of the EnMS
Usually annual energy targets are set in the energy management. These are quantifiable
energy performance requirements and are set to achieve energy objectives of the
municipality. In the meantime, energy objective is outcome or achievement set to meet
energy policy of the municipality that is integrated and explained in the SEAPs of the
municipalities. Table 2 summarises energy targets or objectives as well as planned energy
savings in the first year of the EnMS.
Table 2: First year energy targets/energy objectives and planned energy savings
Planned savings achieved in

Country Energy targets/energy objectives
municipalities
Bulgaria 20% reduction in emissions
Reduce energy consumption by 5 to
France Reduce energy consumption by 5 to 10%
10%

www.500001seaps.eu
Energy and economic savings, support to the 5-10% reduction in energy

Greece SEAP, 5% reduction in energy consumption consumption (higher in SEAP), but not
originally, better understanding of energy use yet achieved
Establish and introduce a specific
methodology about energy use, energy Our target is about 10% of energy
Italy performance and improvement opportunities in saving in LAs Buildings, facilities and
the LAs making sure that the energy aspects infrastructures.
enter in the LAs planning.
Creation and implementation of the EnMS; 5- 5-10% of energy savings in 10 most
Latvia
10% of the savings in public buildings consuming public buildings
Improvement of the energy performance of the
municipality in order to ensure its sustainable
energy development and energy security.
More detailed objectives include:
 Rationalization of energy consumption in
municipal buildings,
 Purchase of EE goods and services,
We assume 2-5% savings within
Poland  Increase of RES use and EE in buildings'
EnMS boundaries
construction,
 Ensuring land use planning considering
the aspect of energy security,
 Good cooperation with energy suppliers,
 Increase of public lighting efficiency,
 Promotion of EE and RES use among
inhabitants
To have external Certification audit in April-
May 2017, and successful pass of it with all 6 Cannot be quantified at this moment it
Romania
municipalities (Resita, Lugoj, Ineu, Sannicolau is too early
Mare, Faget and Otelu Rosu)
The target are economic savings and
Spain 20% in 4 years
environmental savings
1.6 Results from internal / certification audits
One of the final steps before certification process is implementation of the internal audit. It is
systematic and also independent assessment process to evaluate objectively the efficiency
of the EnMS. It is performed annually. During the 50000&1SEAPs project almost all the
municipalities have finalised their first internal audits in their municipalities. Table 3
summarises the main information about the main outcomes of the internal audits and
recommendations. In case municipality already certified their EnMS, recommendations from
the certification audits are presented.
Table 3: Results of internal or certification audits
Number
municipalities with What kind of non- What kind of recommendations from
Country
internal/certification conformities (if any) internal/certification audits
audit
1. Municipality of 1. Municipality of Bratsigovo
Bulgaria 5 Bratsigovo – lack of  It is recommended diaries for operation of
control over supplies boilers and fuel consummation (pellets) to have

www.500001seaps.eu
of energy a single form.

consumables (pellets)  it is advisable to extend the EnMS to include all
2. Municipality of street lighting and transport
Nedelino - lack of  it is advisable to spread the policies and
control over supplies objectives of the municipality energy to
of energy population
consumables (pellets)
3. Municipality of 2. Municipality of Nedelino
Zlatograd - lack of  It would be helpful maintenance worker to have
control over supplies a higher degree in electrical safety
of energy  The scheduling of verification of energy
consumables (pellets) machines would improve the maintenance and
4. Municipality of inspection for leaks of refrigerant.
Rudozem – lack of  Loading of wood pellets in the hopper of the
control over the boiler in kindergarten may be easier if use an
accuracy of the appropriate higher platform.
meters
3. Municipality of Zlatograd
 It would be helpful for achieving the targets of
EnMS to apply incoming control of wooden
pellets for checking their compliance with the
declared indicators
 Providing rapid communication between stoker
and management would help better
surveillance and response in case of need.
4. Municipality of Rudozem
 It is desirable to improve the conditions of the
boiler room in the kindergarten - cemented
floors and removal of unnecessary lighting.
 Advanced activities for creating opportunities
for the use of renewable energy - geothermal
heat, electricity production from pressure
plumbing, solar collectors for hot water.
5. Municipality of Chepelare
 It is recommended to improve order in the
boiler room of the polyclinic building
 It is advisable to require from suppliers of wood
pellets that all packaging will be labelled.
 Electric water heater 100 L in the children's
center can be set to run outside the hours of
expensive energy
 it is advisable to share experiences between
the stoker to influence the parameters of the
combustion process on the fuel pellets.
1 LA
Mainly on legal
1 joint city and LA
France requirement & their Reinforcement of internal organisation
1 internal pending
evaluation
certification
Metamorfosi: Reinforcement of internal organization is needed in all
No non-conformities municipalities and a timeframe should be set clearly for
all procedures. Also clear criteria should be set for
Philothei-Psychiko energy services, products and equipment. In three
Minor nonconformities municipalities ipdate and control should be made with all
and improvement recent legal documents and a time period for checking
opportunities were listed compliance should be specified
in Internal Audit
Metamorfosi
Greece 4 Papagou-Cholargou  A time period for checking compliance with
(for Municipal Fleet only) legislation documents should be specified
Minor nonconformities  The energy targets should be more clearly specified
and improvement at a yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and
opportunities were listed updating energy aspects should be specified
in Internal Audit  The EnMS policy etc. should be externally
communicated, and date for local forum should be
Lavreotiki set
(for Keratea Unit only) Philothei-Psychiko
Energy team is not  The energy targets should be clearly specified at a

www.500001seaps.eu
operational (changes in yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and

personnel) and roles not updating energy aspects should be specified
clearly assigned  Internal communication to all departments and
Minor nonconformities employees should be enhanced
and improvement  Energy data gathering for at least 2016 should be
opportunities were listed finanlised and completed
in Internal Audit Papagou-Cholargou
 The energy targets should be specified at a yearly
basis. The interval for reviewing and updating
energy aspects should be specified
Lavreotiki
 Energy team should be re-established and roles
specified
 The energy targets should be specified at a yearly
basis. The interval for reviewing and updating
energy aspects should be specified
 Internal communication to all departments and
employees should be enhanced
 Energy data gathering for at least 2016 should be
finanlised and completed.
Montecchio Maggiore: 1. Montecchio Maggiore: a public tender for private
absence of Energy certified energy expert has been launched
performance certificate in performing all the Public Buildings Certificate and
all Public Buildings (Legal exposing them as requested by the National Law;
requirement); 2. Montecchio Maggiore: Energy Policy published in
the website of the Municipality, sent by email to all
Montecchio Maggiore: the personnel of the Municipality and posted on the
Internal and external walls of the Municipal Hall and in the Buildings
communication of the managed by the Municipality;
Energy Policy to 3. Marostica: a public tender for private certified
personnel, citizens and energy expert has been launched performing the 5
stakeholders; Public Buildings Certificate and exposing them as
requested by the National Law;
Marostica: absence of 4. Marostica: Certificates of the instruments calibration
Energy performance requested to the Heat contractor company, validity
certificate in 5 Public verified;
Buildings (Legal 5. Heat management contract analyzed, Energy Audit
Italy 3
requirement); analyzed and revised by the company, mistakes
and errors have been corrected and reported,
Marostica: verify the energy performances have been revised and
Certificates of instruments updated.
calibration of the Heat
contractor company;
Analyze and double

check the services
provided by the Heat
contractor company in
respecting the condition
of the Contract in
particular concerning the
quality of the Energy
Audit on Public Buildings
included in the contract
City for Daugavpils (certification audit):
 At the building level – reporting in heat substations;
suggestions for different small scale measures
Other municipalities (internal audits):
1 certified
Latvia No non-conformities  Practical implementation of some of the procedures
3 with internal audits
 Lack of approved documentation in some cases
 Definition of EnMS as well as assignment of more
concrete roles and responsibilities in the contracts
with some of the service providers

www.500001seaps.eu
Internal audit report recommendations went to the

following nonconformities identified:
-No Legal requirements register with applicable norms
and specific requirements were identified
-Energy manager nomination was missing in one
Municipality team Lugoj
-Adaptation and implementation of some procedures
were missing in some cases, such as green
procurement (Resita and Lugoj)
-Management review was not performed at the date of
the audits
Many of these recommendations were very fast
6 internal audits Minor nonconformities
implemented with denkstatt & AMET support as well as
and improvement
local resource allocation. An insight EnMS Manual was
Romania First precertification opportunities were listed
delivered to whole municipalities in order to assure an
visit was handling in in each Internal Audit
internal transfer if information’s for all positions.
February 2017 Reports
More visibilities on results can be found on Internal
System audit reports for each individual municipality.
For all these 6 municipalities precertification visits were

started during the project life (February 2017), performed
by one of the future Certification team members (Mrs.
Iulia Petrea).
The certification audit was scheduled for all 6
municipalities on the period April - May 2017. The
certification body already submitted to AMET a first draft
of audit schedule.
1.7 General observations and lessons learned
During the 50000&1SEAPs, considerable knowledge and lessons learned have been
achieved:
 It takes much longer time that creation of SEAPs; employees should be trained about the
matter; lack of clear monitoring guidelines.
 Quite easy to implement when it is back to back on subcontractor's EnMS.
 EnMS ensures proper monitoring.
 Formalisation not sufficiently mature. Little possibility to expand EnMS to SEAPs and in
all cases not certifiable.
 Benchmarking and change experience with other LAs.
 Competences of internal team members are essential.
 Keeping together the internal team and changing trough the time is mandatory.
 Internal management training is essential for local municipality staff.
 Acknowledgement on all level of the energy policy and empowering the follow up.
 Establish an EnMS in LAs is a pioneering experience. Usually Italian LAs don't use to
establish energy performance, monitoring energy consumption and establish a
continuous improvement. The main challenge is establish a permanent energy team
really and fully focused on the continuous monitoring and improvement and at the same
time provide evidences on the energy improvement to the LAs political staff.
 Useful to have an experienced consulting organization that deals with the ISO standards
development process and prepares all necessary documentation.

www.500001seaps.eu
 Creation of an EnMS turned out to be a bit more time consuming and complicated than
initially expected, especially for those municipalities who had to start from the scratch (i.e.
didn't have any initial data on energy consumption in their buildings & facilities, didn't
have energy managers and weren't working much in the energy field before).
 Still, it is really worth a while to develop such a system as it helps to precisely determine
municipality's initial energy situation and to define procedures for constant improvement
and efficient monitoring of this improvement. Thanks to that it will be easier in the future
to implement any new, energy-related strategies and actions.
 It is good to combine the EnMS with other management systems following ISO (e.g.
QMS following ISO 9001 or EMS following ISO 140001). The rules for implementing
them are similar and the synergy effect will allow for further optimisation of municipal
processes.
 It is important to ensure sufficient promotion of the EnMS developed and implemented in
the municipality to give good example to the citizens and local stakeholders and to
encourage them to contribute to the achievement of local energy targets (e.g. established
in a SEAP).
 There is a will, but enforcement is difficult due to lack of manpower and financial and
organisational issues.
 There is need to train to use energy monitoring system and how to prioritise actions etc.
 Municipalities who are participating in the Project activities in Italy started to analyse and
report information about energy consumption and energy performance basically together
with the project activities. In general they are approaching the energy issues with specific
targets and methodology in the last two years.
 Another important lesson learned is about the boundaries: in several cases, certifiers do
not understand the complexities of the energy use in a Local Authority. Very often
Certifiers focus their attention on the final users of the Public Buildings strictly applying
the requirement 4.3.3 b) of the ISO 50001 excluding for that reason the Schools from the
list of the Buildings under certification process.
 Implementing ISO 50001 was beneficial to LAs allowing them to cross-check that all
obligations were met and that energy management was effective. It took the issue one
step further including for cities that are EEA awardees (such as Lorient who felt the need
to implement ISO).
 The development of the ISO50001 system resulted in a good understanding of the
factors affecting the energy consumption in all municipalities. Even though the data
collection process has been very long, this understanding has become a key issue in
further developing actions, allocating resources and setting priorities with respect to
energy. Even the difficulties in collecting data turned out to be a significant “lesson” for
municipality officials.
 The municipalities had a general interest and variable commitments to sustainable
energy. The setting up of the energy management system has broadened the
understanding of the sustainable energy design and management process. The

www.500001seaps.eu
combination of efforts, teams and support for the SEAP and the EnMS development was
the key success factor to this.
 The Energy Management System can be a tool for the development of the SEAP,
nevertheless, the commitment to the CoM SEAP was initiated Mayors’ commitment for
the manpower required to set the system.
 The good practice transferred by the certified municipality (Likovrisi-Pefki) to the others in
the initial training phase, the political support of the Association for Sustainable
Development of Cities, and the technical support provided by CRES were factors that
helped from the initial decision to the final implementation phase.
 The adaptation of the procedures to the organizational operation of the municipalities is
something new and difficult, due to the number of departments, sectors and procedures
and people involved.
 The setting up of the ISO50001 procedures has proven to be far more time consuming
than expected, even in municipalities with strong commitment from the beginning. This is
due to complexity of internal organization and cooperation among departments, lack of
manpower, and also lack of prior experience. The definition of roles and responsibilities
within the energy management teams has also been complex and time consuming.
 The data collection required for the ISO50001 process, due to the quality and continuity
of the data required is very time consuming, the availability of data was unclear in the
beginning and the data collection process was a very difficult procedure.
 The time constraints and limited human resources led two municipalities to the decision
to limit the boundaries of initial certification, even though their aim is to implement it to all
municipal activities.
 The development of the system is vulnerable to changes both at the Top Management
and also inside the energy team. As this often occurs in municipalities, initial effort for
ensuring continuity should be set at the initial stages of the development of the system,
but this is generally unresolved, providing uncertainty in the final outcome.
 The geographic and organisational dispersion within the one of the municipalities
(Lavreotiki) was an additional barrier.

www.500001seaps.eu
2 Best case studies

2.1 Use of an online energy monitoring platform (Latvia)
Tender for online energy monitoring

Action heading
system
Municipality Daugavpils
Country Latvia
CoM signatory Yes
Works duration 1 month
Total Investment (€) 3,823.00

In order to ensure continuous energy monitoring of the whole system,
municipality developed an Excel spread sheets for energy manager. However,
use of the Excel file didn't ensure involvement of the main stakeholders and
Description of
users of the infrastructure. Therefore municipality decided to tender for an
activities
online energy monitoring system to obtain a platform for monthly data collection
and analysis. Platform is developed by Ekodoma and available online
(www.energoplanosana.lv)
Financing scheme As this is measure with small investments, municipality used its own funding
This activity has qualitative results as it ensures monthly energy data collection
for municipal buildings, street lighting and also public transport and municipal
fleet. It ensures that all persons involved, i.e. energy manager of the
Expected qualitative municipality, technical personnel in the public buildings, as well as technicians
results of the public lighting company etc. have direct access to the database and are
able to analyse energy consumption against energy performance indicators
and take further action. The system allows to reduce the time for data
collections, ensures continuous update for decision makers etc.
Expected quantitative It is forecasted that the use of the online energy system will ensure at least 3%
results of energy consumption and CO2 emissions
Energy savings
542
(MWh/year)
CO2 emissions cut
127
(tCO2/year)
Project status Municipality initiated the use of the system in January 2017
Energy manager, technical personnel in public buildings; technician at the
Entity/ies undertaking
public street lighting department; energy manager at the public transport
the activities
company, vice-mayor

www.500001seaps.eu
2.2 Increasing awareness of people by visual effect (Romania)
Increasing awareness of people by

Action heading
visual effect
Municipality All municipalities involved
Country Romania
CoM signatory yes
Works duration 1 day/municipality, 3 day denkstatt
Total Investment (€) 2370 Euro

Description of
Develop posters to be displayed near electrical equipment consumers
activities
Financing scheme local funds
Increase the awareness of Municipalities servants and population regarding
Expected qualitative
energy consumptions and its sources. The learnings will be applied at home,
results
too.
Expected quantitative
2% of electrical consumption reduction
results
Energy savings
4.4 MWh/year (all 6 municipalities)
(MWh/year)
CO2 emissions cut
2 t CO2/year (all 6 municipalities)
(tCO2/year)
RES used
0.00
(MWh/year)
Project status finalised
Municipalities’ buildings. Could be distributed in schools and hospitals, too
the activities

www.500001seaps.eu
2.3 Energy Efficiency measures in Public Buildings (Italy)
Action heading Energy Efficiency measures in Public Buildings (SEAP Action n.11)
Municipality Pordenone
Country Italy
CoM signatory yes
Works duration 2 years
Total Investment (€) 3,020,000.00
Pordenone Municipality planned several Energy Audit on its Public Building in
Description of
order to decide where energy efficiency measures will be implemented in order
activities
to improve the Public Buildings energy performance
Financing scheme Own funds; third party financing; National financial Scheme (Conto termico)
results Improve the energy performance of the Public Buildings
30 Buildings involved in the Energy Audits and Energy Efficiency measures
results
Energy savings
(MWh/year) 1,368.00
CO2 emissions cut
(tCO2/year) 276.00
RES used
(MWh/year) 0.00
Project status
(building permits,
Planning specific technical projects on energy efficiency measures starting
procurement,
from the Energy Audit already done
contracts, works
status)
LG; SOGESCA; Cofely
the activities

www.500001seaps.eu
2.4 Optimising EnMS on public assets (France)
Action heading Optimising EnMS on public assets

Municipality Tours Plus and all municipalities involved
Country France
CoM signatory Yes
Total Investment (€) 100 000
The LA of Tours Plus and the municipality of Tours plan to :
 Reduce energy consumption of their own assets (EE studies on behaviour
Description of and triggering works)
activities  Participate to EE studies done by municipalities in the conurbation of Tours
Plus on their municipal assets
 Put in place an energy counsellor for all municipalities
Financing scheme Local funds
The actions will allow identifying the possibilities of consumption reduction as
Expected qualitative well as necessary refurbishment works.
results An advisory activity supported by the LA will be beneficial to the municipalities
and will allow to increase consciousness and skills
20% of energy consumption reduction
results
Energy savings
55 600
(MWh/year)
CO2 emissions cut
0.00
(tCO2/year)
RES used
0.00
(MWh/year)
Project status
(building permits,
procurement, On-going
contracts, works
status)
Tours Plus
the activities

www.500001seaps.eu
2.5 Municipal Fleet Renewal X (Spain)
Action heading Municipal Fleet Renewal X
Municipality Xinzo
Country Spain
CoM signatory Yes
Works duration
Total Investment (€) 137,000.00

Description of
activities
Financing scheme
results
results
Energy savings
(MWh/year) 29.65
CO2 emissions cut
(tCO2/year) 3.00
RES used
(MWh/year) 0.00
Project status
the activities

www.500001seaps.eu
2.6 Installation of metering systems in public buildings and schools (Greece)
Action heading Installation of metering systems in public buildings and schools

Municipality Papagou-Cholargou
Country Greece
CoM signatory Yes
Works duration 2017-2019
Total Investment (€) 150.000
Activities include the installation of metering systems and sensors aiming at the
constant monitoring of energy consumption at real time and applies to existing
children’s and infants day care centres and school buildings, including the
st
Description of ongoing project of energy refurbishment of the 1 Lyceum (last level high
activities school) of Cholargos, financed by the Region of Attica.
This project is complementary to the activities for energy upgrading, efficiency
and energy saving of Municipal infrastructures, included in the Municipality
Operational Programme 2015-2019
The Municipality is seeking funding through the Structural Funds Programme
NSRF 2014-2020, “Improvement of access to Information and Communication
Financing scheme
Technologies, their use and quality” and/or “Supporting the transition to a low
carbon economy in all sectors’’, but alternatively, will use own funds.
Energy savings will be produced through the proper use of all the energy
systems, coupled with the Energy Management procedures developed in the
Municipality. Improved comfort and living conditions will also be achieved. All
employees, as well as school pupils will be sensitised on the energy
results
consumption issues and energy efficient use of all building systems (operation
of windows, thermostat settings, shading, heating systems etc.). The
educational and dissemination aspect to the citizens is also expected to be high.
Energy and CO2 savings described below.
results
Energy savings
71,00
(MWh/year)
CO2 emissions cut
61,00
(tCO2/year)
RES used
0.00
(MWh/year)
Project status
(building permits,
The project is at the planning stage, and is expected to be launched in 2017 or
procurement,
2018.
contracts, works
status)
Municipality
the activities

www.500001seaps.eu
2.7 Monitoring of electricity, natural gas and water consumption (Poland)
Action heading Monitoring of electricity, natural gas and water consumption

Municipality Grybów
Country Poland
CoM signatory YES
Works duration since 2015
Total Investment (€) 0.00
In 2015 Grybów launched monitoring of media consumption (including
electricity, natural gas and water) in all public buildings and of electricity
consumption for street lighting purposes. Monitoring data are provided by
Description of energy distributors and supplier and are used to optimise this consumption and
activities to quickly react to any system failures. Through simple actions, like turning off
unused monitors, multi-function devices and printers or turning off unnecessary
lights, the municipality already managed to reduce its energy demand by
approx. 10% compared to 2015.
Financing scheme LG budget
Increasing energy awareness of public buildings' employees
results
Reducing energy consumption by approx. 10%
results
Energy savings
3.00
(MWh/year)
CO2 emissions cut
2.4
(tCO2/year)
RES used
0.00
(MWh/year)
Project status
(building permits,
Implementation of the system has been completed and first results of its
procurement,
operation are already known.
contracts, works
status)
Municipality of Grybów and its relevant organisational units
the activities

www.500001seaps.eu
2.8 Installation of solar PVs (Bulgaria)
Installation for electricity generation up

Action heading
to 30 KW
Municipality Bratsigovo Municipality
Country Bulgaria
CoM signatory Yes
Total Investment (€) 41 976
Description of Photovoltaic installation on the roof of the hospital building in Bratsigovo

activities Municipality /30 kW/.
Financing scheme LG Budget
The polyclinic building, as the largest municipal buildings’ consumer of
Expected qualitative electricity, is a very good source of RES being used not only for its own needs,
results but also with the purpose to sale the excess electricity being transformed into
the transmission power grid to EVN.
Expected Photovoltaic modules 250 Wp polycrystalline 60 cells COP 15.29% for
quantitative results electricity generation up to 30 kW.
Energy savings
24
(MWh/year)
CO2 emissions cut
0.39
(tCO2/year)
RES used
22.472
(MWh/year)
Project status The installation is on the roof of the Polyclinic building, located in UPI VII-
(building permits, Hospital, district 31 of the town of Bratsigovo with administrative address: 35
procurement, Treti Mart Blvd. The location of the terrain is suitable for installation of
contracts, works photovoltaic facilities in terms of orientation towards the sun and existing
status) electricity and transport infrastructure.
Entity/ies
undertaking the Bratsigovo Municipality
activities

www.500001seaps.eu
Executive summaries in national

languages
Kopsavilkums
Neskatoties uz to, ka ISO 50001 sākotnēji tika veidots industrijām, pašvaldību enerģētikas
plānošanas procesa laikā radās vajadzība pēc sistemātiskas pieejas enerģijas patēriņa un
CO2 emisiju samazināšanai arī vietējās pašvaldībās. Projekta 50000&SEAPs mērķis bija
integrēt energopārvaldības sistēmu, balstoties uz ISO 50001, ilgtspējīgas enerģētikas
rīcības plānos vairāk kā 40 pašvaldībās.
Šis ziņojums apkopo energopārvaldības sistēmas ieviešanas pārbaužu un monitoringa

rezultātus astoņās partnervalstīs. Saskaņā ar ISO 50001 prasībām, pārbaudes fāzē
pašvaldība veic:
 Plāno un veic pienācīgu uzraudzību un mērīšanu;

 Regulāri izvērtē attīstību;
 Pārvalda neatbilstības, koriģē pasākumus un preventīvos pasākumus;
 Veic kontroles ierakstus;
 Plāno un veic iekšējo energopārvaldības sistēmas auditu;
 Pārskata energopārvaldības sistēmu.
Kā 50000&1SEAPs projekta pieredze rāda, dažādās valstīs un pat dažādās pašvaldībās

vienā valstī var būt pilnīgi atšķirīgi motivācijas iemesli. Starp galvenajiem motivatoriem un
iemesliem, kāpēc vairāk kā 40 vietējās pašvaldības izveidoja, ieviesa un sertificēja savas
energopārvaldības sistēmas un integrēja tās savos ilgtspējīgas enerģētikas rīcības plānos ir
– normatīvais regulējums, iespēja samazināt izmaksas, iespēja uzraudzīt un pieprasīt
nolīgtos pakalpojumus, iespēja sistemātiskai pieejai, datu pieejamība un personiskās
intereses.
Tajā pašā laikā, joprojām ir arī dažādi šķēršļi un izaicinājumi, kas jāpārvar. 50000&1SEAPs
konsorcijs identificēja trīs veidu šķēršļus: pirmais un svarīgākais – cilvēks, tad finansiālais
(tomēr par šo ziņoja mazs skaits pašvaldību) un trešais – tehniskais.
Pirmā ziņojuma daļa apkopo detalizētu informāciju par rezultātiem un energopārvaldības

sistēmas ieviešanas pieredzi vairāk kā 40 dažādās pašvaldībās, astoņās ES valstīs. Otrā
ziņojuma daļa ir veltīta dažādiem labās prakses piemēru izpētei astoņās valstīs.

www.500001seaps.eu
Resumen ejecutivo
A pesar de que la ISO 50001 fue diseñada inicialmente para industrias, a lo largo del
proceso de planificación energética en los municipios, la necesidad de un enfoque
sistemático para reducir el consumo de energía y las emisiones de CO2 planteadas también
aparició en las autoridades locales. El objetivo del proyecto 50000&1SEAPs ha sido integrar
Planes de Acción de Energía Sostenible (PAES) en más de 40 municipios con sistema de
gestión de energía (ISO 50001).
En este informe se resumen los resultados de la comprobación y el seguimiento de la

aplicación del sistema de gestión energética (SGE) en los ocho países socios. De acuerdo
con los requisitos de ISO 50001, en la fase de verificación el municipio deberá:
 planificar y llevar a cabo un seguimiento y una medición adecuados;

 evaluar periódicamente el cumplimiento;
 gestionar las no conformidades, medidas correctoras y medidas preventivas;
 registros de control;
 planificar y llevar a cabo la auditoría interna del SGE;
 revisar el SGE.
Como muestran las experiencias de 50000&1SEAPs, en diferentes países e incluso en

diferentes municipios del mismo país, habrá diferentes motivadores. Entre los principales
motivadores y razones por las que más de 40 autoridades locales desarrollaron,
implementaron y certificaron sus sistemas de gestión de energía y los integraron en sus
PAES son: marco regulatorio, posibilidad de reducir costos, oportunidad de supervisar y
requerir servicios contratados, disponibilidad de datos e interés personal.
Mientras tanto, todavía existen diferentes barreras y desafíos a superar. El consorcio

50000&1SEAPs identificó tres tipos de barreras: primero y más importante - humana, luego
financiera (aunque señalada por un número menor de municipios) y la tercera - técnica.
En el primer capítulo del informe se resumen los resultados y la experiencia en la aplicación

del SGE de más de 40 municipios de ocho países de la UE. El segundo capítulo está
dedicado a los diferentes estudios de caso de las mejores prácticas en los ocho países.

www.500001seaps.eu
Резюме
Макар че Стандартът ISO 50001 е първоначално създаден за промишлени
предприятия, в процеса на енергийно планиране на общините се появява нуждата от
систематичен подход за намаляване на консумацията на енергия и емисиите на CO2
на териториите на местните администрации. Целта на проект „50000 and 1 SEAPs“ бе
да се интегрират Планове за действия за устойчива енергия (ПДУЕ) в над 40 общини
със система за енергийно управление в съответствие с ISO 50001.
Настоящият доклад обобщава резултатите от проверката и мониторинга от

прилагането на системите за управление на енергията (СУЕ) в осем партньорски
държави. Според изискванията на ISO 50001 на етап проверка общините трябва да:
· Планират и проведат правилен мониторинг и измервания;

· Периодично да оценяват съответствието;
· Управляват отклонения, корективни и превантивни мерки;
· Контролират данните;
· Планират и провеждат вътрешен одит на СУЕ;
· Преразглеждат СУЕ.
Както показва опитът от „50000 and 1 SEAPs“, в различни държави и дори в различни
общини в рамките на една и съща държава има различни мотивиращи фактори. Сред
основните мотивиращи фактори и причини, поради които над 40 местни органа
внедриха и се сертифицираха в съответствие с ISO 50001, интегрирайки своите
системи за управление на енергията в разработените в общините ПДУЕ са:
регулаторна рамка, възможност за намаляване на разходите, възможност за надзор и
изискване на външни услуги, възможност за системен подход, наличност на данните и
личен интерес.
В същото време са налице различни ограничения и предизвикателства, с които

общините трябва да се справят. В резултат от опита, натрупан в рамките на „50000 and
1 SEAPs“, проектният консорциум идентифицира три основни групи ограничения: на
първо място – кадрови, след това финансови (макар и определени като такива от
малко на брой общини), а на последно място – технически.
Първата глава от доклада подробно обобщава резултатите и опита от прилагане на

СУЕ в над 40 общини в осем различни европейски държави. Втората глава е
посветена на различни добри практики, свързани с внедряването и сертифицирането
на СУЕ в осемте държави.

www.500001seaps.eu
Sumar Executiv
Deși inițial Standardul ISO 50001 a fost conceput pentru industrie, în cadrul procesului de
planificare energetică a municipalităților, necesitatea unei abordări sistematice privind
reducerea consumului de energie și a emisiilor de CO2 a crescut și în cadrul autorităților
locale. Obiectivul proiectului 50000&1 SEAP a fost integrarea Planurilor de Acțiune privind
Energia Durabilă (SEAP) cu Sistemul de Management Energetic (ISO 50001) în mai mult de
40 de municipalități.
Acest raport sintetizează rezultatele verificării și monitorizării implementării Sistemului de

Management Energetic (EnMS) în cele opt țări partenere. Conform cerințelor ISO 50001, în
faza de control municipalitatea trebuie:
 să planifice și să efectueze monitorizarea și măsurarea corespunzătoare;

 să evalueze permanent conformitatea;
 să gestioneze neconformitățile, măsurile corective, precum și pe cele preventive;
 să mențină controlul asupra înregistrărilor;
 să planifice și să efectueze un audit intern al EnMS;
 să revizuiască EnMS.
După cum arată experiența proiectului 50000&1SEAP, în diferite țări și chiar în diferite
municipalități din aceeași țară, vor exista diferiți factori motivaționali. Dintre principalii factori
motivaționali pentru care mai mult de 40 de autorități locale au dezvoltat, implementat și
certificat sistemele lor de management energetic și le-au integrat în PAED putem enumera:
cadrul de reglementare, posibilitatea reducerii costurilor, posibilitatea de monitoriza și de a
solicita contractarea serviciilor, posibilitatea unei abordări sistematice, precum și
disponibilitatea datelor și interesul personal.
În același timp, încă există diferite obstacole și provocări de depășit. Consorțiul

50000&1SEAPs a identificat trei tipuri de bariere: primul și cel mai important – cel uman, apoi
cel financiar (deși semnalat de un număr mic de municipalități), iar al treilea – cel tehnic.
Primul capitol al raportului rezumă detaliat rezultatele și experiența în implementarea EnMS

la mai mult de 40 de municipalități din opt țări diferite ale UE. Al doilea capitol este dedicat
diferitelor studii de caz privind cele mai bune practici ale EnMS în cele opt țări.

www.500001seaps.eu
Executive summary
Anche se lo standard ISO 50001 è nato inizialmente per il miglioramento della performance
energetica nei processi industriali, anche nelle realtà degli Enti Locali il processo di
pianificazione energetica sta assumendo un ruolo prioritario per la riduzione dei consumi
energetici e per l’abbattimento delle emissioni di CO2 da essi generate. L’obiettivo del
Progetto Europeo 50000&1SEAPs è quello di integrare la logica dei Sistemi di Gestione ISO
50001 con i PAES (Piani d’Azione per l’Energia Sostenibile) in più di 40 Enti Locali negli 8
Paesi target del progetto.
Il presente report riassume i risultati derivanti dal controllo e dal monitoraggio sullo stato di
implementazione dei Sistemi di Gestione dell’Energia negli 8 Paesi target. In accordo con
quanto previsto dai requisiti della ISO 50001, con particolare riferimento al controllo ed al
monitoraggio sullo stato di attuazione del Sistema di Gestione dell’Energia, gli Enti Locali
coinvolti sono tenuti a:
 pianificare e svolgere un adeguato monitoraggio e misurazione della propria

performance energetica;
 valutare periodicamente la propria conformità ai requisiti legali in materia di energia;
 gestire le non conformità, le misure correttive e le misure preventive;
 mantenere aggiornati i propri registri di controllo del Sistema di Gestione;
 pianificare e svolgere gli audit interni conformemente a quanto previsto dalla Norma
ISO 50001;
 aggiornare, rivedere e riprogrammare i propri obiettivi, traguardi e piani energetici.
Come dimostrato dalle esperienze maturate nell’ambito del Progetto 50000&1SEAP, in

diversi Paesi membri così come in diverse realtà locali (Comuni, Gruppi di Comuni,
Agglomerazioni e Federazioni) dello stesso Paese, sono presenti diverse ragioni
motivazionali a spingere i diversi Enti Locali verso il percorso della certificazione ISO 50001.
Tra queste, le principali le ragioni per le quali più di 40 autorità locali hanno sviluppato,
implementato e certificato i propri Sistemi di Gestione dell’Energia integrandoli nei loro PAES
vi sono: la coerenza ed il rispetto del quadro normativo cogente in tema di energia per gli
Enti Locali, possibilità di riduzione dei costi energetici, la possibilità di supervisione e di
controllo dei servizi e dei contratti di fornitura in tema di energia, possibilità di adottare un
approccio sistematico alla gestione energetica dell’Ente, disponibilità dei dati ed interesse
personale nella gestione energetica dell’Ente da parte di amministratori e funzionari.
Allo stesso tempo restano ancora presenti alcune barriere ed alcune sfide importanti da
superare. Il Consorzio europeo del Progetto 50000&1SEAPs ha identificato le tre maggiori
barriere che dovranno essere superate nella gestione energetica degli Enti: la prima e più
importante è quella legata all’aspetto della sensibilità personale verso il tema di gestione
energetica degli amministratori e dei funzionari pubblici; la seconda è quella riguardante la

www.500001seaps.eu
disponibilità finanziaria per gli investimenti (sottolineata da diverse amministrazioni locali); la

terza è relativa alle conoscenze tecniche in campo a disposizione dei funzionari e degli
amministratori locali.
Il primo capitolo del presente report riassume in dettaglio i risultati e le esperienze di

implementazione maturati nei Sistemi di Gestione dell’Energia certificati nei 40 Enti Locali
beneficiari delle attività progettuali provenienti dagli 8 Paesi membri coinvolti. Il secondo
capitolo è dedicato alle migliori pratiche di implementazione dei Sistemi di Gestione
dell’Energia negli 8 Paesi membri coinvolti.

www.500001seaps.eu
Σύνοψη
Αν και το ISO 50001 αρχικά σχεδιάστηκε για βιομηχανίας, προέκυψε από τις Τοπικές Αρχές
η ανάγκη για συστηματική προσέγγιση για τη μείωση της ενεργειακής κατανάλωσης και των
εκπομπών CO2 καθ’ όλη τη διαδικασία του ενεργειακού σχεδιασμού στους Δήμους. Ο στόχος
του έργου 50000&1SEAPs ήταν να ενσωματώσει τα Σχέδια Δράσης Αειφόρου Ενέργειας
(ΣΔΑΕ) σε πάνω από 40 Δήμους με Σύστημα Διαχείρισης Ενέργειας (ISO 50001).
Η έκθεση συνοψίζει τα αποτελέσματα από τον έλεγχο και την παρακολούθηση της
εφαρμογής του Συστήματος Διαχείρισης Ενέργειας (ΣΔΕ) στις οκτώ χώρες των εταίρων.
Σύμφωνα με τις απαιτήσεις του ISO 50001, στη φάση του ελέγχου ο Δήμος θα:
 σχεδιάζει και πραγματοποιεί κατάλληλη παρακολούθηση και μέτρηση

 αξιολογεί περιοδικά τη συμμόρφωση.
 διαχειρίζεται μη συμμορφώσεις, διορθωτικά μέτρα και προληπτικά μέτρα
 ελέγχει αρχεία
 σχεδιάζει και διεξάγει εσωτερικό έλεγχο του ΣΔΕ.
 αναθεωρεί το ΣΔΕ.
Όπως δείχνει η εμπειρία από τo 50000&1SEAPs, σε διαφορετικές χώρες και ακόμη και σε
διαφορετικούς δήμους της ίδιας χώρας, θα υπάρχουν διαφορετικοί κινητήριοι παράγοντες.
Μεταξύ των κύριων παραγόντων και των λόγων για τους οποίους περισσότεροι από 40
οργανισμοί τοπικής αυτοδιοίκησης ανέπτυξαν, εφάρμοσαν και πιστοποίησαν τα συστήματα
ενεργειακής τους διαχείρισης και τα ενσωμάτωσαν στα ΣΔΑΕ τους είναι: κανονιστικό πλαίσιο,
δυνατότητα μείωσης του κόστους, δυνατότητα εποπτείας και απαίτησης προδιαγραφών
υπηρεσιών, δυνατότητα συστηματικής προσέγγισης, διαθεσιμότητα δεδομένων και
προσωπικό ενδιαφέρον.
Εν τω μεταξύ, εξακολουθούν να υπάρχουν διάφορα εμπόδια και προκλήσεις που πρέπει να

ξεπεραστούν. Η κοινοπραξία του 50000&1SEAPs εντόπισε τρία είδη εμποδίων: πρώτο και
πιο σημαντικό – τα ανθρώπινα, στη συνέχεια τα οικονομικά (αν και επισημαίνονται από μικρό
αριθμό Δήμων) και τρίτο – το τεχνικό.
Το πρώτο κεφάλαιο της έκθεσης συνοψίζει λεπτομερώς τα αποτελέσματα και την εμπειρία
από την εφαρμογή του EnMS από περισσότερους από 40 δήμους σε οκτώ διαφορετικές
χώρες της ΕΕ. Το δεύτερο κεφάλαιο είναι αφιερωμένο σε διάφορες περιπτωσιολογικές
μελέτες σχετικά με βέλτιστες πρακτικές στις οκτώ χώρες.

www.500001seaps.eu
Streszczenie
Choć normę ISO 50001 wprowadzono z myślą o przedsiębiorstwach, jej wdrożenie może
być korzystne także dla samorządów lokalnych, które potrzebują bardziej
usystematyzowanego podejścia do działań ukierunkowanych na redukcję zużycia energii i
emisji gazów cieplarnianych. Celem projektu 50000&1 SEAPs było wsparcie ponad 40
europejskich miast i gmin w integracji Planów działań na rzecz zrównoważonej energii
(SEAP) z systemami zarządzania energią (SZE).
Niniejszy raport podsumowuje rezultaty 3 fazy („sprawdzenie”) wdrażania SZE w ośmiu

krajach partnerskich. Zgodnie w wymogami normy ISO 50001 w fazie tej gmina powinna:
 zaplanować i zapewnić właściwy monitoring systemu;

 okresowo oceniać zgodność systemu z normą;
 usunąć wszelkie niezgodności i wprowadzić odpowiednie środki naprawcze i
zapobiegawcze;
 kontrolować zapisy;
 zaplanować i przeprowadzić wewnętrzny audyt systemu;
 dokonać przeglądu systemu.
Jak pokazuje doświadczenie projektu 50000&1SEAPs, w różnych krajach (a nawet różnych

gminach z tego samego kraju) występują różne czynniki motywujące do zaplanowania,
wdrożenia i certyfikowania systemu zarządzania energią i jego integracji z planem SEAP.
Wśród nich wymienić można: krajowe regulacje, możliwość zmniejszenia kosztów działania,
lepszą kontrolę nabywanych usług zewnętrznych, przyjęcie bardziej systematycznego
podejścia do zarządzania energią, dostępność danych czy osobiste zainteresowanie
tematem.
Istnieją też bariery i wyzwania, które utrudniają wdrażanie systemu w gminach. Do

najważniejszych barier zidentyfikowanych przez konsorcjum projektu 50000&1SEAPs
należą: brak odpowiednich zasobów kadrowych, brak środków (choć ten problem
zasygnalizowała niewielka liczba samorządów) i przeszkody natury technicznej.
W pierwszym rozdziale raportu szczegółowo omówiono najważniejsze doświadczenia i

rezultaty związane z wdrażaniem SZE w ponad 40 miastach i gminach z 8 krajów UE. Drugi
rozdział jest natomiast poświęconym przykładom dobrych praktyk w tym zakresie.

www.500001seaps.eu
Résumé
Même si l'ISO 50001 a d'abord été conçue pour le secteur de l’industrie, tout au long du
processus de planification énergétique dans les municipalités, le besoin d’une approche
systématique pour réduire la consommation d'énergie et les émissions de CO2 s’est fait
ressentir dans les collectivités locales. L'objectif du projet 50000 & 1SEAPs était d'intégrer
des plans d'action énergétiques durables (SEAP) dans plus de 40 municipalités dotées d'un
système de gestion de l'énergie (ISO 50001).
Ce rapport résume les résultats de la vérification et du suivi de la mise en œuvre du système

de management de l'énergie (SMEn) dans les huit pays partenaires. Selon les exigences de
l'ISO 50001, dans la phase de vérification, la municipalité doit:
• planifier et effectuer une surveillance et une mesure appropriées;

• évaluer périodiquement la conformité;
• gérer les non-conformités, les mesures correctives et les mesures préventives;
• dossiers de contrôle;
• planifier et effectuer un audit du SMEn;
• vérifier le SMEn.
Comme l'expérience de 50000&1SEAPs le montre, dans différents pays et même dans

différentes municipalités du même pays, il y aura différents facteurs de motivation. Les
principaux facteurs de motivation et les raisons pour lesquelles plus de 40 autorités locales
ont développé, mis en œuvre et également certifié leurs systèmes de gestion de l'énergie en
les intégrant dans leurs SEAP sont : cadre réglementaire, possibilité de réduire les coûts,
possibilité de superviser et la nécessité de services contractuels, possibilité d'approche
systématique, disponibilité des données et intérêt personnel.
En attendant, il existe encore des obstacles et des défis à surmonter. Le consortium

50000&1 SEAPs a identifié trois types d'obstacles: le premier et le plus important – l’humain,
puis financier (bien que signalé par un nombre mineur de municipalités) et le troisième -
technique.
Le premier chapitre du rapport résume en détail les résultats et l'expérience de la mise en

œuvre de l'EnMS auprès de plus de 40 municipalités dans huit pays de l'UE différents. Le
deuxième chapitre est consacré aux études de différents cas de meilleures pratiques de
SMEn dans les huit pays.

www.500001seaps.eu
CONSORTIUM:
SOGESCA (Coordinator) - www.sogesca.it

CRES - www.cres.gr
PNEC - www.pnec.org.pl
EKODOMA - www.ekodoma.lv
ARM - www.arm-bg.net
ECQ - www.ecq-bg.com
AMET - www.amet.ro
DENKSTATT - www.denkstatt.ro
DEPUTACION OURENSE - www.depourense.es
ALBEA - www.albea-transenergy.com
AMORCE - www.amorce.asso.fr
MT PARTENAIRES INGÉNIERIE - www.mt-partenaires.com
ICLEI Europe - www.iclei-europe.org

Report On The Implementation of The Enms According To Iso 50001

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report On The Implementation of The Enms According To Iso 50001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report on the implementation of

the EnMS according to ISO 50001

Deliverable No. D5.2

Co-author(s) All partners

Date February 2017

File Name D5.2_monitoring_EMS_50000&1.docx

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 2

 plan and carry out proper monitoring and measurement;

As experience from 50000&1SEAPs show, in different countries and even in different

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 3

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 4

Internal audit Monitoring and

Figure 1: The approach of ISO 50001

 plan and carry out proper monitoring and measurement;

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 5

 manage non conformities, corrective measures and preventive measures;

1 Development and implementation of

In total 34 municipalities, 1 conurbation with 17 cities, 1 joint city-conurbation with 22 cities

Table 1: Summary on created energy management systems in eight EU countries

Number of LAs Level of success

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 6

Zarszyn, Żyraków) initially planned

Integrating EEA and EnMS: experience from France

1.2 Main motivators

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 7

Legislation: Provisions in the national legislation, e.g. towards

Knowledge and assistance: Technical assistance from project

Cost reduction: Recognition of the effort for minimization of

Supervision: Control over different contractors

Systematic approach: for evaluation of projects, tenders and

Persons: member of the City Council, member of the technical

Data availability: Possibility to have qualitative data

Figure 2: Main groups of motivators of implementation of EnMS in municipalities

1.3 Barriers and challenges

In general throughout the whole process all these

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 8

o Identification of the “right” energy manager throughout the process;

The ISO 50001 certification raised several issues:

1.4 Energy data monitoring

According to the ISO 50001 standard, municipalities have to ensure monitoring,

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 9

An important aspect during establishment of the EnMS is to ensure appropriate frequency of

Figure 3: Energy consumption data collection practice in eight partner countries

1.5 Energy targets of the EnMS

Planned savings achieved in

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 10

Energy and economic savings, support to the 5-10% reduction in energy

1.6 Results from internal / certification audits

Table 3: Results of internal or certification audits

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 11

of energy a single form.

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 12

operational (changes in yearly basis. The interval for reviewing and

Analyze and double

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 13

Internal audit report recommendations went to the

For all these 6 municipalities precertification visits were

1.7 General observations and lessons learned

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 14

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 15

Implementation of the EnMS according to ISO 50001 16

2 Best case studies

Tender for online energy monitoring