1SEAPs Energy Review Energy Baseline and EnPI SOGESCA

3rd Centralized Training Session
Thursday, 19 November – Friday, 20 November – 2015

Lyon (FRA)
Integrating SEAP+EnMS: Energy Review, Energy Baseline

and definition of the EnPI
Emanuele Cosenza
SOGESCA Srl
e.cosenza@sogesca.it
Supporting Local Authoritites in the Development and Integration of SEAPs with
Energy management SystemsAccording to ISO 500001
www.50001seaps.eu
@50001SEAPs
EMANUELE COSENZA
SOGESCA
Project Development
Municipalities supported in the Project Activities:
• Pordenone (52,000 inh.)
• Montecchio Maggiore (24,000 inh.)
• Marostica (14,000 inh.)
• Federazione dei Comuni del Camposampierese (11
Municipalities, 97,000 inh.)
Supporting Local Authoritites in the Development and Integration of SEAPs with www.50001seaps.eu
Energy management SystemsAccording to ISO 500001 @50001SEAPs 2
TRAINING MENU
SEAP+EnMS in theory SEAP+EnMS in practice
COFEE BREAK
SEAP+EnMS in theory SEAP+EnMS in practice
• Energy review • Working Group exercises on:
• Energy Baseline 1. Energy use evaluation in a
Municipality
• Definition of the EnPI
2. Definition of a Monitoring Plan
PURPOSE OF THE ISO 50001
The purpose of the ISO 50001 standard is to enable
organizations to establish the systems and process necessary to
improve energy performance, including energy efficiency, use
and consumption.
ISO implementation is intended to lead to CO2 emission
reduction and environmental impacts related to energy use
and consumption;
Applicable to all types and sizes of organization;
It does not establish absolute requirements for energy
performance.
Energy management SystemsAccording to ISO 500001 @50001SEAPs
PURPOSE OF THE ISO 50001
IMPLEMENTATION
Help and enable World wide Leading to reduction

organizations to application will in:
establish the contribute to:
GHG
systems and
More efficient emissions;
processes necessary
use of energy
to improve: Energy costs;
sources;
Energy Other
Enhanced
performance; environmental
competitiveness;
impacts
Energy use;
Reduce GHG (climate
Energy and other change);
consumption; environmental
Through systematic
impacts
Energy management of
efficiency energy
ISO 50001 AND SEAPs: SAME PURPOSES, DIFFERENT
METHODOLOGIES
CO2 emission reduction and environmental impacts related to

energy use and consumption;
ISO 50001 applicable to all types and sizes of organization;
ISO 50001 It does not require specific improvements of the
energy performance “minimum targets”;
Otherwise SEAP “minimum targets” are defined: 20-20-20 +
(40%/2030 GHG reduction according with the new CoM)
SEAP applicable in a L.G. or groups of LGs (Joint SEAP option 1-
2).  ISO 50001 in industry/Tertiary/Services etc.
SEAP AND SEAP+EnMS, WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES?
SEAPs SEAP+EnMS
Internal Structure of the Public Administration Top Management (official commitment)
Baseline Emission Inventory Energy Baseline + definition of EnPI

Vision of the most relevant aspects Energy Policy (official commitment)
Action Plans Action Plans
Implementation Implementation
Monitoring and reporting of the actions Monitoring and measure for Effectiveness (what
to measure, how, who is the responsible,
frequency, …)
Internal and External Communication Internal and external Communication
(stakeholders involvement, Energy Days, …)
Approval by the C.C. Certification and Registration
Energy management SystemsAccording to ISO 500001 (stage 1 and Stage
@50001SEAPs
Approval by JRC 2)
SEAP AND SEAP+EnMS, WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES?
SEAPs SEAPs + EnMS

Energy Consumption in LGs (Buildings, Public Energy Consumption in Public Administration
Lighting, Vehicle fleet) (Buildings, Public Lighting, Vehicle fleet)
(Should be an estimation) (Real consumption data)
Energy Consumption in Private sectors: Definition of EnMS boundaries:

Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Private Application of the EnMS at LG areas including
Transport, Waste production, Renewable EnMS approach for private sectors
energy Production (…) management
Definition of consumption indicators Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI)

(MWh/year – CO2 reduction/year) (Detailed indicators about energy use)
Definition of monitoring indicators Definition of monitoring indicators

SEAP+EnMS BENEFITS
Allows systems and processes to be established to improve
energy performance, energy use and energy consumption;
Introduces a continual improvement process;
Creates energy monitoring plans as well as energy analysis
activites;
Formalizes energy policy and objectives
Improve energy efficiency, energy consumption and use, and the
drive toward innovation.
 Institutionalization of the SEAP
SEAP+EnMS BOTTOM LINES BENEFITS
Reduction in energy costs;
More efficient use of available energy sources;
Improved business (services in a LG) performance;
Clear definition of roles and responsibilities about energy issues;
Clear vision of the energy balance of the territory;
Networking with stakeholders for local energy planning;
Reduction in GHG emissions;
Monitoring and implementation of legal requirements focused on
energy issues
SEAP+EnMS KEY ELEMENTS
Energy Management
Technical
(Understanding energy use, Control)
Data metering
Analysis - Competency
People
Energy Efficient culture
Awareness – Motivation – Training - Commitment
Commitment
(Organizational)
Time – Resources - Capital
SEAP+EnMS ENERGY BASELINE, ENERGY REVIEW AND
EnPI Courrent energy sources,
past and present energy use
Energy use analysis and consumption,
estimation of future energy
use and consumptio
Facilities, equipments and

Identification of suppliers that affect energy
significant energy use use and consumption.
Determine courrent energy
use and consumption
Identify and
prioritize RES potential, potential
opportunities of energy sources, energy New Baseline forecasting
improving energy efficiency potential
performance
LIST OF THE PROCEDURES – EnMS DOCUMENTATION
Procedures of the System (EnMS)
Operative procedures
• Energy Uses Evaluation  Energy Review (WP3)
• Public lighting systems
• Legal requirements • Heating plants and boilers
• Energy objectives, energy targets and EnMS Action Plan (WP4) • Air conditioning systems
• Public vehicle fleet
• Competence, training and awareness
• Private sectors (SEAP)
• Communication (internal and external) (WP6) • Other
• Documentation control
• Monitoring, measurement and analysis (WP5)
• Nonconformities, Correttive Actions and Preventive Actions
• Audit
• Management Review
• Monitoring suppliers Design
• + SEAP Management and Monitoring
ENERGY REVIEW
ISO 50001 par. 4.4.3: The organization shall develop, record, and
maintain an energy review. The methodology and criteria used to
develop the energy review shall be documented. To develop the energy
review, the organization shall:
Analyse energy use and energy consumption based on measurement and other data;
Based on the analysis of energy use and consumption, identify the area of significant
energy use (facilities, equipment, systems, process and personnel working for, or on
behalf of, the organization that significantly affect energy use consumption);
Identify other relevant variables affecting significant energy use (external temperatures
etc.);
Determine the current and the future energy use and consumption;
Identify, prioritize and record opportunities for improving energy performance.
ENERGY USE ANALYSIS AND DEFINITION OF THE
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the boundaries in SEAP+EnMS development
Public Buidings and facilities; LGs direct energy use
Public Lighting; sectors influenced and
controlled by the LG
Vehicles fleet;
 Private sectors: Residential, Commercial, Agriculture, Industrial, Public
and Private Transport
are not included in the EnMS boundaries and are not directly
influenced and controlled by the LG, but they represent significant energy use
sectors in the LG area
LIST OF THE PROCEDURES
Procedures of the Sistem (EnMS)
• Energy Uses Evaluation
IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECT ENERGY USES
Considering the results of the energy analysis, the direct energy use by
the municipality are identified by the Energy Team in the following
categories or within them:
Energy Consumption of Public Buildings;
Energy Consumption of the municipal vehicle fleet;
Energy Consumption of public lighting system;
RES Installations from public initiative;
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct energy use in LG
Data Consumption/Ye
Category Energy Use Energy Year U.M.
consumption ar (MWh)
SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00
SCHOOLS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 560.000,00 m3 5.491,11
SCHOOLS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 2.847.721,00 KWh 2.847,72
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 347.470,00 m3 3.407,14
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 750,00 l 4,95
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 1.012.386,00 KWh 1.012,39
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 527.406,00 m3 5.171,51
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 900,00 l 9,86
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 750.000,00 KWh 750,00
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 600.000,00 m3 5.883,33
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 500,00 l 5,48
PARKING AREAS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 602.629,00 KWh 602,63
CEMETERIES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 67.009,00 KWh 67,01
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09
PUBLIC LIGHTING Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 6.407,71 MWh 6.407,71
TOTAL 33.078,58
ENERGY BASELINE
Where they come from these data?
Energy bills;
Billing consumption paid to the different suppliers of energy (electricity,
natural gas, fuel, etc.)
(where possible) Other data were collected through survey and analysis
specifications developed during the performance of energy audits of
various buildings owned by LG.
Tool proposed in the 1st and 2nd Centralized Training where used for italian
Municipalities
Dati 50001 Massanzago\raccolta dati consumi energia P.A. paes
consegnato.xls
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct energy use in LG: be carefull!
Data Consumption/Ye
Category Energy Use Energy Year U.M.
consumption ar (MWh)
SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00
SCHOOLS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 560.000,00 m3 5.491,11
SCHOOLS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 2.847.721,00 KWh 2.847,72
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 347.470,00 m3 3.407,14
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 750,00 l 4,95
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 1.012.386,00 KWh 1.012,39
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 527.406,00 m3 5.171,51
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 900,00 l 9,86
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 750.000,00 KWh 750,00
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 600.000,00 m3 5.883,33
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 500,00 l 5,48
PARKING AREAS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 602.629,00 KWh 602,63
CEMETERIES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 67.009,00 KWh 67,01
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09
PUBLIC LIGHTING Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 6.407,71 MWh 6.407,71
TOTAL 33.078,58
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct energy use in LG: be carefull!
Procedures of the System (EnMS) Represent a crucial step in order
• Energy Uses Evaluation to manage direct energy use
especially for
• Legal requirements
buildings/facilities where
• Energy objectives, energy targets and EnMS Action Plan energy final users are third
• Competence, training and awareness parties
• Communication (internal and external)
• Documentation
• Monitoring, measurement and analysis
• Nonconformities, Correttive Actions and Preventive Actions
• Audit
• Management Review
• Monitoring suppliers Design
• + SEAP Management
Supporting Localand Monitoring
Authoritites in the Development and Integration of SEAPs with www.50001seaps.eu
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct energy use in a LG We are already in the
Monitoring phase
Energy Consumption in LG 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Electricity Consumption in
Buildings (kWh) 4.823.310 5.169.116 4.631.749 4.528.085 4.647.538
Thermal Consumption in
Buildings (m3) 3.008.620 2.567.462 2.003.016 1.952.378 1.402.726
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct energy use in a LG
Energy consumption in LG 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Public Lighting (kWh) 7.309.420 7.425.813 7.492.428 7.393.484 7.085.875
We are already in the
Monitoring phase
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct energy use in a LG
Diesel consumption in Gasoline consumption in
2010 Liters Liters
LG Vehicle fleet 4.599,0 8.357,2
LIST OF THE PROCEDURES
Procedures of the Sistem (EnMS)
• Energy Uses Evaluation
IDENTIFICATION OF INDIRECT ENERGY USES
In addition, energy uses are identified in the territory, on which the City to
act by the actions of the SEAP, within the following categories:
Energy consumption in Residential sector
Energy consumption in the Local Public Transport
Energy consumption in private Transport
Energy consumption in Industry
RES production in private sectors
Energy consumption in Tertiary sector
Energy consumption in Agriculture
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the indirect energy use according to the SEAP requirements
Annual consumption
Energy use Energy U.M. Year 2010 in MWh according
with the baseline SEAP
Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 32.043.918,12 313.448,18

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 61.181,97 61.181,97
Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 18.945.404,14 185.320,73
Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 109.101,09 109.101,09
Local Public Transport Diesel ton 585.000,00 6.411,60
Fuel consumption in private Transport Gasoline ton 9.979,30 121.163,71
Fuel consumption in private Transport Diesel ton 13.045,46 155.580,24
Fuel consumption in private Transport Liquid gas ton 594,70 6.748,03
Thermal energy consumption in Industry METHANE m3 2.543.359,93 24.878,72
Electricity consumptions in Industry Electr. MWh 45.199,84 45.199,84
TOTAL 1.029.034,10
ENERGY BASELINE
Definition of the direct/indirect energy use according to the SEAP
requirements
Final Energy Consumption per Sector [MWh]
2% Edifici, attrezzature/impianti comunali
9%
25% Edifici, attrezzature/impianti terziari (non
comunali)
Edifici residenziali
Illuminazione pubblica comunale

0,004
Industrie (escluse le industrie contemplate nel
Sistema europeo di scambio delle quote di
emissione – ETS)
15% Parco auto comunale
48%
Trasporti pubblici
1%
Trasporti privati e commerciali
ENERGY BASELINE
Where they come from the data consumption of private sectors?
Energy consumption data coming from D.S.O. (Electricity and Natural
Gas);
National/Regional/Provincial database (fuel sales; diesel consumption in
Residential Sector; RES Production at Local level; etc)
 Following a bottom-up approach in data collection which represent one of

the requirements of our Project!
ENERGY BASELINE
Through energy consumption data collection we defined:
Energy baseline;
Energy Review;
And now, through the "Energy use evaluation procedure" to establish:

Significant or not significant energy use
Documentazione Pordenone\50.001_Pordenone\Procedure ISO

50.001\PSE_01_Valutazione usi energia rev.1 del 13.11.2015.docx
DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT AND NOT SIGNIFICANT
ENERGY USE
DIRECT ENERGY USES
Criteria 1 If >2% and
If <2% If >8%
<8%
Percentage of energy use compared to total
Points 0 Points 10
consumption Points 5
Criteria 2
If >2% and
Potential reduction of energy consumption through If <2% If >5%
<5%
energy audits assessed complete or alternatively
Points 0 Points 5
estimated from literature data on improvement Points 2
opportunities applicable
Criteria 3
If >5 years and
Investment Payback period evaluated through If >10 years If <5 years
<10 years
comprehensive energy audits or alternatively estimated
Points 0 Points 5
from literature data on improvement opportunities Points 2
applicable
Payback period could become interesting for

ESCOs and for the Political staff who is in
charge to take decisions
ENERGY USE Let’s take a look to
the file
DIRECT ENERGY USES
Consumption/Year Results
Category Energy Use Energy Year Data consumption U.M. % CR.1 CR.2 CR.3 Total
(MWh) (S/NS)
SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00 2,0% 5 2 2 9 S

SCHOOLS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 560.000,00 m3 5.491,11 24,8% 10 5 2 17 S
SCHOOLS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96 0,0% 0 NS
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 2.847.721,00 KWh 2.847,72 10,3% 10 2 2 14 S
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 347.470,00 m3 3.407,14 12,3% 10 2 2 14 S
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 750,00 l 4,95 0,0% 0 NS
ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96 0,0% 0 NS
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 1.012.386,00 KWh 1.012,39 3,6% 5 2 2 9 S
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 527.406,00 m3 5.171,51 18,6% 10 2 2 14 S
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28 0,0% 0 NS
SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 900,00 l 9,86 0,0% 0 NS
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 750.000,00 KWh 750,00 0,0% 0 NS
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 600.000,00 m3 5.883,33 0,0% 0 NS
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28 0,0% 0 NS
OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 500,00 l 5,48 0,0% 0 NS
PARKING AREAS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 602.629,00 KWh 602,63 2,2% 5 5 5 15 S
CEMETERIES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 67.009,00 KWh 67,01 0,2% 0 5 5 10 S
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23 1,7% 0 0 0 0 NS
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94 0,0% 0 0 0 0 NS
VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09 1,2% 0 0 0 0 NS
PUBLIC LIGHTING Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 6.407,71 MWh 6.407,71 23,1% 10 5 5 20 S
TOTAL 33.078,58 100,0%
DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT AND NOT SIGNIFICANT ENERGY
USE
INDIRECT ENERGY USES (PRIVATE SECTORS ACCORDING WITH SEAP
REQUIREMENTS)
Criteria 1 It is awarded the maximum score of 10 points to the

Percentage of energy use compared to the percentage increased, and proportionally intermediate
total consumption in the territory as calculated scores are assigned until reaching zero for lower
in the "baseline" percentages.
If not specific If general interest If specific

Criteria 2 interest of the of the interest of the
"stakeholders" "stakeholders" "stakeholders"
Interest from "stakeholders"
0 points 5 points 10 points
Remember that according to the WP4 we have to

implement 3 measures in during the year after
SEAP approval…
This evaluation come from the Baselne + Energy
ENERGY USE Review and from meeting with stakholders.
As in Montecchio Maggiore Example
INDIRECT ENERGY USES
Annual
consumption in
assessments made by
Energy use Energy U.M. Year 2010 MWh according % CR.1 Total results
stakeholders
with the baseline
SEAP
Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 32.043.918,12 313.448,18 30,7% 10 10
Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 61.181,97 61.181,97 6,0% 2 2
Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 18.945.404,14 185.320,73 18,1% 6 6
Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 109.101,09 109.101,09 10,7% 3 3
Local Public Transport Diesel ton 585.000,00 6.411,60 0,0% 0 0
Fuel consumption in private Transport Gasoline ton 9.979,30 121.163,71 11,8% 4 4
Fuel consumption in private Transport Diesel ton 13.045,46 155.580,24 15,2% 5 5
Fuel consumption in private Transport Liquid gas ton 594,70 6.748,03 0,7% 0 0
Thermal energy consumption in Industry METHANE m3 2.543.359,93 24.878,72 2,4% 1 1
Electricity consumptions in Industry Electr. MWh 45.199,84 45.199,84 4,4% 1 1
TOTAL 1.029.034,10 100,0%
ENERGY USE
THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS CONCERNING THE SIGNIFICANT/NOT
SIGNIFICANT ENERGY USE WILL BE REPORTED IN THE ENERGY REVIEW
DOCUMENT AS WELL AS IN THE TABLE OF THE EnPI
kWh/m2th
kWh/m3th
kWh/m2el
kWhel/th produced by renewable energy plant/year
Costs indicators:
€/kWhth/m3
€/kWhel
Analisi Energetica Iniziale Bozza rev AR 09 09 2015.docx
INTRODUCING WORKING GROUP ACTIVITIES
Working Groups – Implementing SEAP+EnMS
Partners divided in 3 small groups will work together on:
Energy use evaluation in a Municipality – Exercise 1
15 minutes working groups
5 minutes each group: presentation of the results and discussion
Definition of a Monitoring Plan – Exercise 2
15 minutes working groups
5 minutes each group: presentation of the results and discussion
INTRODUCING WORKING GROUP ACTIVITIES
Working Groups – Implementing SEAP+EnMS
GROUP FIFTY
CRES Expert Partner
AMET Less expert partner
OURENSE Less expert partner
DENSKSTATT Less expert partner
OTHERS
GROUP THOUSAND
PNEC Expert Partner
ARM Less expert partner
ALBEA Less expert partner
AMORCE Non expert partner
OTHERS
GROUP ONESEAP
ECQ Expert Partner
EKODOMA Less expert partner
MT PARTENAIRES Less expert partner
OTHERS
THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION!
Emanuele Cosenza
SOGESCA Srl
www.sogesca.it
e.cosenza@sogesca.it

1SEAPs Energy Review Energy Baseline and EnPI SOGESCA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1SEAPs Energy Review Energy Baseline and EnPI SOGESCA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3rd Centralized Training Session

Thursday, 19 November – Friday, 20 November – 2015

Integrating SEAP+EnMS: Energy Review, Energy Baseline

Help and enable World wide Leading to reduction

CO2 emission reduction and environmental impacts related to

Baseline Emission Inventory Energy Baseline + definition of EnPI

SEAPs SEAPs + EnMS

(Should be an estimation) (Real consumption data)

Energy Consumption in Private sectors: Definition of EnMS boundaries:

Definition of consumption indicators Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI)

Definition of monitoring indicators Definition of monitoring indicators

Facilities, equipments and

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECT ENERGY USES

LG Vehicle fleet 4.599,0 8.357,2

IDENTIFICATION OF INDIRECT ENERGY USES

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 32.043.918,12 313.448,18

Illuminazione pubblica comunale

 Following a bottom-up approach in data collection which represent one of

And now, through the "Energy use evaluation procedure" to establish:

Documentazione Pordenone\50.001_Pordenone\Procedure ISO

Payback period could become interesting for

SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00 2,0% 5 2 2 9 S

VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23 1,7% 0 0 0 0 NS

VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94 0,0% 0 0 0 0 NS

VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09 1,2% 0 0 0 0 NS

Criteria 1 It is awarded the maximum score of 10 points to the

If not specific If general interest If specific

Remember that according to the WP4 we have to

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 32.043.918,12 313.448,18 30,7% 10 10

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 61.181,97 61.181,97 6,0% 2 2

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 18.945.404,14 185.320,73 18,1% 6 6

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 109.101,09 109.101,09 10,7% 3 3

Local Public Transport Diesel ton 585.000,00 6.411,60 0,0% 0 0

Fuel consumption in private Transport Gasoline ton 9.979,30 121.163,71 11,8% 4 4

Fuel consumption in private Transport Diesel ton 13.045,46 155.580,24 15,2% 5 5

Thermal energy consumption in Industry METHANE m3 2.543.359,93 24.878,72 2,4% 1 1

Electricity consumptions in Industry Electr. MWh 45.199,84 45.199,84 4,4% 1 1

TOTAL 1.029.034,10 100,0%

Analisi Energetica Iniziale Bozza rev AR 09 09 2015.docx

You might also like