Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructions on Assignment:
Assignment
The assignment is an individual written piece of work (as opposed to a piece of written group
work) and you are required to answer all three elements of the question.
The investment management department of your company has asked you to construct a
speculative trading strategy using options. You have been asked to invest £100,000 in
options trading strategy for a single FTSE 100 or FTSE 250 non-bank, non-insurance
company’s shares for the 35 working day period between Monday 9th March 2020 and 28th
April 2020 (inclusive).
a) For the company whose shares are to be the underlying for your options, set up an
options-based trading strategy given your view of:
• the company
• current market sentiment regarding the segment in which it operates
• likely market movements over the period.
You must support your analysis using real market data (suitably evidenced) as well as
suitable academic literature covering analysis methods such as, for instance, economic,
fundamental, technical etc.
You must include ‘screen shot’ evidence of the source of your options pricing in an
appropriately referenced appendix.
1
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
b) What is the annualised return that you are targeting based on your approach? Assess
the risk that your strategy will not produce the returns you have anticipated. You must
also assess the risks that the use of an options derivative instrument has introduced to
the investment management department.
(500 Words: 10 Marks)
c) Report on the actual profit and loss of your strategy over the period and analyse its
actual performance relative to its forecast performance and analyse why your strategy
achieved the results observed.
(500 Words: 15 Marks)
The assignment should be word processed within the limit of 2,000 words (excluding
appendices, tables, charts and graphs). The word count must be stated in the assignment.
References to relevant academic theory and research findings should be provided and
referenced appropriately.
To complete the assignment, you are required to refer to books and academic journal articles
and authentic sources such as Bloomberg. Do not use wikipedia, investopedia, investorword,
tutor4u and other non-academic sources.
The regulations specify that students must complete every assessment component
contributing to the modules on their programme. This applies to all forms of assessment as
defined in the module descriptor. Please note that:
if any assessment component is not completed, students will be failed in the module
even if the module pass mark has been achieved;
if the requirements for referral specified in section 3 of ARNA 1 are met, a re-sit
opportunity will be given;
if unable to complete an assessment component because of extenuating circumstances,
students should follow the procedure described in the Student Guide to Extenuating
Circumstances1.
This change has applied since September 2013 and was approved by Academic Board in
consultation with the Students’ Union. Students should consult their Programme Leader or
Guidance Tutor if they have any queries. Independent advice and support is also available
from the Students’ Union Advice & Representation Centre (su.advice@northumbria.ac.uk) or
from a student adviser in Student Services.
1
ARNA and the Student Guide to Extenuating Circumstances Affecting Assessed Work are
available from http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/central/ar/lts/assess/assproc/assdocstud/
If the assignment is within +10% of the stated word limit no penalty will apply.
2
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment
cover sheet. The word count does not include:
Please note, in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g.
“dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.
If this word count is falsified, students are reminded that under ARNA page 30
Section 3.4 this will be regarded as academic misconduct.
If the word limit of the full assignment exceeds the +10% limit, 10% of the mark provisionally
awarded to the assignment will be deducted. For example: if the assignment is worth 70 marks
but is above the word limit by more than 10%, a penalty of 7 marks will be imposed, giving a
final mark of 63.
Students are advised that they may be asked to submit an electronic version of their
assignment.
The time allocated for the presentation must be adhered to. At the end of this time, the
presentation will be stopped and will be marked based on what has been delivered within the
time limit.
Submission of Assessment:
All assignments must be submitted via the Undergraduate Programme Office. Each
assignment must be accompanied by an Assessed Work Form which must be completed in
full. The assignment will not be accepted by the Undergraduate Programme Office unless the
form is completed correctly.
The APA method of referencing uses the author's name and the date of the publication. In-text
citations give brief details of the work you are referring to in your text. References are listed at
the end of the text in alphabetical order by the author's name. The general format of an
electronic journal reference in the APA style is shown below:
Coutu, D. (2009). Why Teams Don't Work. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 98-105.
Retrieved 29th April 2012 from EBSCO http://searchebscohost.com
3
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
Author/s name and initials are listed first, followed by year of publication in brackets. Then
there is the title of article and the journal where the article appears, which is in italics. Then
state the volume and issue number (in brackets) along with the pages where article can be
located. Finally add the date the article was retrieved and then the name of the database,
followed by the web address. Wherever possible use the homepage URL rather than the full
and extended web address.
www.northumbria.ac.uk/skillsplus
You will find other useful help guides on Skills Plus to help you with the skills involved in writing
your assessments and preparing for exams.
For further information on the APA style of referencing see the Concise Rules of the APA
Style and the APA website http://www.apastyle.org/
Your attention is drawn to the University’s stated position on plagiarism. THE WORK OF
OTHERS, WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSIGNMENT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ITS
SOURCE (a full bibliography and/or a list of references must be submitted as prescribed in the
assessment brief).
Please note that this is intended to be an individual piece of work. Action will be taken where
a student is suspected of having cheated or engaged in any dishonest practice. Students are
referred to the University regulations on plagiarism and other forms of academic irregularity.
Students must not copy or collude with one another or present any information that they
themselves have not generated.
For further information on Plagiarism, see the Referencing and Plagiarism topic
on Skills Plus. www.northumbria.ac.uk/skillsplus
4
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
This assessment will contribute directly to the following Undergraduate programme goals and
objectives.
1.
Acquire knowledge of functional areas of business and management.
2.
X Acquire knowledge of specialist areas of business.
3.
X Apply their knowledge to business and management contexts.
1.
X Provide evidence of self-reflection as a means of informing personal development planning.
2.
Demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills and the ability to work in a team.
3.
X Demonstrate critical thinking skills
4. Employable as graduates
Objectives:
Students will be able to:
X 1.In the context of securing graduate employment demonstrate the skills of self-presentation.
5
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
Trait 0 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - 100
Knowledge and Majority of work is Performance Legitimate Knowledge A maturing Impressive Excellent
Understanding neither relevant shows elements content but base is ability to relate knowledge and knowledge and
nor accurate. of legitimate relies heavily on generally sound theory and understanding. appreciation for
content. the descriptive. and some evidence, Clearly subject.
Analysis may be critical concepts and demonstrates Fastidious eye
unsophisticated. appreciation ideas is critical for detail.
shown. displayed. appreciation.
Critical Theory and
appreciation is evidence are
evident. invariably
related.
Structure and Often inarticulate Content is more Work may Content is Argument or Assured ability
Analysis usually
Alignment and can be often than not contain some clear but can always relevant, logical to challenge
incomprehensible. inappropriate. use of concepts, lack some generally well reasoning is received
but is poorly set clarity of focus. focused and always relevant wisdom and to
out and needs organised. and well sustain
an appropriate sustained. argument or
focus. logical
reasoning under
these terms.
6
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
Part a)
7
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
Part 1b)
8
Assessment Brief – Level Five Undergraduate
Part c)
10