Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vice President for Academic Issues and Research

Course: Inglés B1
Code: 900003
Activity guidelines and evaluation rubric – Task 5
Technology Development Production

1. Activity description

Type of the activity: Individual

Evaluation moment : Intermediate at Unit 3
Activity higher score: 70 grades
Activity starting date: Activity deadline: viernes, 24 de
sábado, 4 de abril de 2020 abril de 2020
In this activity, it is expected to achieve the following learning
results:
The student creates a webpage using the appropriate structures in
English to talk about his/her strengths and weaknesses related to his
job.
The activity lies in:
Step 1. Check the content of Units 1, 2 & 3 from the E-book.
Step 2. Each student creates a Wix page with the following
characteristics:

CONTENT

Slide 1: Describe your skills

Slide 2: Describe your weaknesses
Slide 3: Describe 2 jobs that you like
Slide 4: Describe the main source of
employment in your city.

Include some pictures to illustrate your

ideas

You can use these links to know HOW TO BUILD a Wix Page:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxostuzhL00
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0ey32JN4Ns

Step 3: Upload the link in the forum

Step 4: Check your classmates Wix pages and make 2 comments about
their work. Include information that needs to be taken into account and
point out mistakes. A comment is not to write a compliment, not just
saying “good work”, this won’t be graded as a comment.

To develop this activity, consider:

At initial information environment, you must Check for the initial and
closing dates of the task.

At evaluation environment, you must submit the final work containing

the link of the wix page, in the Task 5 – Technology Development
Production - Evaluation rubric and activity submission.

At learning environment, you must study the topics related to the unit
3 (Module 5 & Module 6).
Enter to the forum and participate in the development of the
collaborative activity.

Individual work evidences:

The individual evidences to submit are:
A pdf document with the link for the wix page.

Group work evidences

At this activity no evidences needed
2. General guidelines for the development of the evidence to
submit

For evidence developed Individual, consider the following

guidelines

 Every member of the group must participate with academic’s

contributions in the activity development.

 Before delivering the requested product, all the requirements

indicated in this activity guide must be checked.

Take into account that all individual or group written work must fulfil
with the orthographic rules and presentation conditions that have been
defined.
Concerning the use of references, consider that the requested work in
this activity must fulfil with the standards APA

In any case, the standards of reference must be complied. Academic

plagiarism must be avoided. Students can support the written
products by using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual campus.

Consider that In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article 99,
it is considered as offenses that undermine the academic order,
among others, the following: literal e) “Plagiarism, that is, submitting
as of its own authorship the all or part of a work, document or
invention made by another person.

It also implies the use of quotes or false references, or proposing

quotes where there is no match between it and the reference ”and
literal f) “Reproducing or copying for profit, educational materials or
results of research products, which have intellectual rights reserved
for the University.

The academic sanctions the student will face are the following:
a) In cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the respective
academic work or evaluation, the grade that will be imposed will be
zero points without prejudice to the corresponding disciplinary
sanction.

b) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the academic work

whatever its nature, the qualification that will be imposed will be zero
points, without prejudice to the corresponding disciplinary sanction.
 b) Evaluation rubric Format

Type of the activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate at Unit 2
Activity higher score: 70 grades
High level:
The design of the wix page is neat, the text font is clear, the
webpage includes pictures to illustrate the ideas.
First evaluation
If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to 14
standard
points
Formal assessment
Medium level:
The design of the
The wix page is not organized, the text font doesn’t follow a
wix page is neat and
structure which makes difficult to understand the message, the
includes pictures to
webpage doesn’t’ include pictures to illustrate the ideas.
illustrate the ideas.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points to 9
points
This standard
represents 14
Low level
score of the
The student didn’t send the webpage.
activity
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points to 4
points

Second evaluation High level:

standard Participations are relevant, articulated and contribute to the
Participation construction of the webpage. The contributions are posted
Assessment according to the schedule.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to 14
The student points
provides clear and
useful input for the Medium level:
classmates to There is minimum participation in the writing forum and/or the
improve their comments made do not help in the construction of the text.
webpages If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points to 9
points
This standard
represents 14 Low level
score of the The student didn’t participation at all in the forum.
activity If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points
 High level:
Third evaluation
The student publishes the webpage in the forum in the time
standard
stipulated.
Participation
If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to 14
Assessment
points
The student
Medium level:
publishes the
The student publishes the webpage in the forum in the last 3
webpage in the
days of the activity.
forum in the time
If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points to 9
stipulated.
points
This standard
Low level
represents 14
The student didn’t send the webpage.
score of the
If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points
activity
High level:
The webpage contains 4 slides each one with one of the topics
proposed. The student answers appropriately the information for
Fourth evaluation
the 4 topics proposed.
standard
If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to 14
Content assessment
points
The webpage
Medium level:
answers
The webpage doesn’t contain the 4 slides with the topics
appropriately the 4
proposed. The webpage lacks some information from the 4
topics proposed.
topics proposed.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points to 9
points
This standard
represents 14
Low level
score of the
The student didn’t send the webpage. The webpage doesn’t
activity
have the structure and the information suggested.
If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points

High level:
Fifth evaluation
The sentences in the webpage are coherent and with an
standard
adequate structure and grammar of the language. The
Content assessment
vocabulary is appropriate for the activity and the unit from the
course.
The sentences are If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to 14
coherent and with points
an adequate
structure and Medium level:
grammar of the The student uses the appropriate grammatical topics but with
language. some mistakes in structure. The vocabulary is poor or do not use
the vocabulary proposed in the unit.
This standard If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points to 9
represents 14 points
score of the
activity Low level
The student didn’t send the webpage.
If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points